Public Policy LATAM Regional Forum - GS1
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Public Policy LATAM Regional Forum Elizabeth Board 17 October 2018
My long ago youth
© GS1 2017
Agenda
• Level set – what is Public Policy in GS1? Who are we?
• How to work with government authorities –5 Steps
• MO Public Policy Case Study - Brazil
• Policy Opportunities
• MO Public Policy Case Study – Ecuador
• More Policy Opportunities
• MO Public Policy Case Study – Columbia
• MO Public Policy Case Study - Argentina
• Next steps in the region/ Discussion
© GS1 2018 3
GS1 Public Policy Mission
Promote a globally consistent
policy framework supporting the
adoption and implementation of
GS1 standards and services
© GS1 2018 4
The global Public Policy team
Elizabeth Board
Vice-President
Global Public Policy
Géraldine Francesca
Lissalde-Bonnet Poggiali
Director Public Director Public
Policy Healthcare Policy Europe
Laure Pontis
Patrik Jonasson
Assistant Manager
Director Public
Public Policy
Policy International
Healthcare
Simone Casadei
Pastorino
Manager PR/Media
and Public Policy
© GS1 2018 5
Why engagement with Government matters
Standards creation and adoption are being driven by
regulators at the national, regional and global level
Opportunities Risks of not engaging
• Increase the adoption of GS1 • Regulatory frameworks threaten
standards adoption of GS1 standards
• Helpful Government intervention • Waiting for a crisis to introduce GS1
more likely to fail than succeed
• Industry support
• Misunderstanding of GS1 standards
never corrected
© GS1 2018 6
How to work with government authorities
Step 1: Know the players and
the process
© GS1 2018 7
HOW: Know the STAKEHOLDERS Identify Create
Target Group Partnerships
in the your policy environment
Advocacy requires networking and interaction with a wide range of stakeholders
Government ministries such as International NGOs
Trade, Agriculture, Customs, Health such as WHO, ADB & WB
Legislators & regulators GS1 Public Policy Local Trade Associations
national, state, local Consumer Organisations
Business Organisations
Regional Intergovernmental bodies
at regional or international level
such as OAS, OECD, APEC and ASEAN
such as ABAC, BIAC and ICC
© GS1 2018 8
HOW: Know the policy making process in your country
Input Decision making Output
• Legislative process PM / President
(political parties) Laws
• Private sector / trade Regulatory
associations Regulations
• NGOs Legislative
• Citizens / consumer groups Guidelines
• Media Judicial
How is the Is government
process involvement the
different in your only way public
country? policy is made?
© GS1 2018 9
How to work with government authorities
Step 2: Analyse the priorities
and politics
© GS1 2018 10What are the What influences
Government priorities Government policy
Develop
understanding of the
policy making process
How does official What are the key
policy process function Government agencies
© GS1 2018 11Understand their mandate & current focus / problems
Governments everywhere are looking to
• Simplify processes
• Digitalize everything
• Increase safety
• Reduce loss
• Provide more product transparency
for citizens
• Reduce costs of implementing
regulations
© GS1 2018 12Healthcare Public Policy Discussion Papers
http://www.gs1.org/healthcare/position-papers
Healthcare page
>Case studies & more information
>Publications & position papers
© GS1 2018 13How to work with government authorities
Step 3: Learn how to tell the
story so it matters to policy
makers
© GS1 2018 14Match messages to government needs
• Reframe marketing messages
• Messages to industry are focused on efficiency and cost savings, messages to
government need to be more focused on safety and neutrality
• Promote GS1 ‘big community’ of industry supply chain participants and
leverage international connections/documents
- WCO, WHO, APEC, EU Commission, OECD, UN, OAS
- Examples of national regulations citing GS1
© GS1 2018 15How to present GS1
GS1 standards are open (not proprietary) and
Open standards
publicly available
Leveraging existing standards and best
Already in use by industry practices lowers cost of implementing new
regulations
Use examples of GS1 standards used by
Endorsed by government European Commission, APEC, OAS, Health
Ministries, and other national governments
© GS1 2018 16Good example
© GS1 2018 17Messaging
Do’s Don’ts
• GS1 is neutral • Position GS1 as a monopoly
• GS1 works collaboratively in areas • Seek a Government mandate to
of shared interests regulate the usage of GS1
standards
• GS1 System is based on consensus
driven standards with voluntary • Go to Government without industry
adoption support
© GS1 2018 18How to work with government authorities
Step 4: Build support, build
coalitions and have industry
behind you
© GS1 2018 19Reach out to regional associations
© GS1 2018 20Ensure collaboration through local trade associations
© GS1 2018 21Intergovernmental Organisations can be important
• Latin American Integration • Forum for East Asia and Latin
Association (Asociación American Cooperation
Latinoamericana de Integración, • The Organization of American States
ALADI)
- Consumer Safety & Health
• Chambers of Commerce in your Network – SIAR recall system
country & AACCLA –Association of
• The Community of Latin American
American Chambers of Commerce in
and Caribbean States
LATAM
• The Union of South American Nations
• Mercosur
• The Central American Integration
System (SICA Sistema de la
Integración Centroamericana)
• The Pacific Alliance
© GS1 2018 22MO Public Policy Engagement
Virginia Vaamonde, GS1 Brazil
© GS1 2018 23Use of passive UHF RFID technology in postal flow T&L
• Monitoring of postal items using UHF RFID technology
• UPU and the Correios in the quest for quality improvements Country:
Brazil
and gain in competitiveness have chosen GS1 standards as a Sector:
Government
tool to achieve this goal. Affairs
Situation Approach
Given the growing demand for parcel transport
services, mainly driven by e-commerce, the UPU Several meetings were held, the Government Affairs
(Universal Postal Union) understood that it would team worked on the relationship between the entities,
need new solutions and services that would allow resulting in a technical partnership agreement, signed by
the maintenance of quality, guaranteeing the President of GS1 Brazil and the President of
competitiveness in the segment. Brazil, having Correios.
characteristics such as an extensive geographical
area and volume of remittances, was chosen to host The Industry Engagement team was responsible for
the development of a pilot project based on RFID the technical meetings and workshops related to the
technology. application of the standards, presenting their
The Brazilian Post (Correios), a governmental characteristics and how they are key to the success of the
company, UPU partner in this project, sought GS1 project.
Brazil for understanding that we are a neutral
entity and reference in the RFID subject.
© GS1 2018 24Use of passive UHF RFID technology in postal flow T&L
• Monitoring of postal items using UHF RFID technology
• UPU and the Correios in the quest for quality improvements Country:
Brazil
and gain in competitiveness have chosen GS1 standards as a Sector:
Government
tool to achieve this goal. Affairs
Results
The team responsible for the project defined the RFID-encoded SSCC as the
identification key to be adopted as the standard for parcel identification. The global
standard will allow for simpler integration with customers. The project, based on GS1
standards, will allow other UPU member countries to easily implement the system.
Project’s milestones:
Project’s numbers: • 2018/11 – First pilot, 20.000 parcels
• 202 postal facilities • 2019/07 – Project starts running
• 2346 RFID portals • 2019/12 – Infrastructure deployment will be complete
• 461mi RFID Tags/year • 2020/01 – Project adoption reaches 60% of capacity
• 2021/01 – Project runs at 100% capacity (461mi parcels)
© GS1 2018 25How to work with government authorities
Step 5: Find the window of
opportunity
© GS1 2018 26Timing is everything
• Policy design (after Ministerial
approval, but prior to public
consultation) is the critical period
• Understand legislative and budget
planning cycles –be in it for the long
game
- 2 years is fast, 5 years not long
• Stretch to provide consultation
submissions
Picture Source: Jezabel.com
© GS1 2018 27Example of the time it can take…
European Union regulation on the free-flow of non-personal data
• 2 public consultations: platforms, online intermediaries, data, cloud
computing and the collaborative economy; building a European data
economy (GS1 submitted comments)
• 4 dedicated studies and study workshops
• 3 structured dialogue meetings with Member States and bilateral
discussions
• Stakeholder engagement / workshops
• 2 impact assessments
• …and after all that the political approval process starts
© GS1 2018 28Policy opportunities
Innovation
Border Management
Traceability/Safety
Fighting Illicit Trade
Global Inter-Gov Consultations
Free Flow of Non-Personal Data
© GS1 2018 29THINK ABOUT IT…
ALL the following NEW OPPORTUNITIES for policy
engagement have
SOMETHING IN COMMON
REGISTRIES are a requirement
GOOD VALIDATED DATA is a requirement
© GS1 2018 30Innovation
Transforming the Last Mile
• GS1 standards enable the seamless
flow of physical deliveries and
customer data ultimately driving the
transformation of the last mile for
the benefit of all
• https://www.gs1.org/sites/default/fi
les/gs1_customer-
centric_logistics_wp_a4_081018_hi-
res.pdf
© GS1 2018 31Innovation
Internet of things consultations all over the world
© GS1 2018 32Auto-ID Labs and IoT
• KAIST
- GS1-Based Smart City Service Intercommunity
- Internet of Food and Farm
• University of Cambridge - Smart Waste Management of
Food Items
• Fudan University -Identification of Item and Location Based
on Wide Area Network (WAN)
© GS1 2018 33Innovation – GS1 Digital Link
Physical
identification
Digital
identification
© GS1 2018 34Innovation – Transparency & Digital Link
• European Union: Alcohol Ingredient and
Nutritional Declaration industry proposal
to provide the information off-label but
accessible from the label via web-link,
QR code or smart technologies
• GMO labelling in US / Smart Label
• Australia sugar labelling consultation
• Sustainability & circular economy
© GS1 2018 35MO Public Policy Engagement
Fausto Reyes, GS1 Ecuador
© GS1 2018 36La confianza empieza con la visibilidad
© GS1 2018 37HITO 1 HITO 2 HITO 3 HITO 4: GS1-128
1992
13.304 GCP
1’765.932 GTIN
Regulaciones
públicas Cumplimiento
normas nacionales,
trazabilidad Internacionales,
eficiencia logística
14.605 GLN
© GS1 2018 38Policy opportunities
Border management
© GS1 2018 39Border Use Cases
Single Border
Clearance - FTA
Validation of
Food Alert for
SPS e-Cert at
Recall
the Border
Border use cases are a range of
Enhanced Data
applications of GS1 standards in Duty Collection
for e-Commerce
Risk
Management -
Small Parcels
border procedures as identified by the Border Use Single Window
Cases
GS1 community and stakeholders
Supplementary
Automatic Data
Information to
Transfer – for
Identify High
Expedited Trade
Risk shipments
Trust in Single
Detection of
Border
Counterfeit
Arrangement -
Trade
AEO
© GS1 2018 40Where border agencies want to focus inspection efforts
Agency effort Trade volumes
Decide
not to comply
Don’t want to
comply: effort and
cost
Try to comply but don’t
always manage
Consistently do the right thing
Regulatory Compliance Pyramid
© GS1 2018 41Where border agencies can end up focusing inspection
efforts due to:
Insufficient data Data entry errors
e.g. HS code for Decide e.g. wrong port
products too broad for origin listed
not to comply
accurate identification Don’t want to
comply: effort and
cost
Data not timely Non-unique data
e.g. out of sync with Try to comply but don’t multi addresses,
always manage
shipment spelling errors
Consistently do the right thing
GS1 Standards can help overcome these data problems and facilitate trade
Companies, trade associations and GS1 can work together to support change
© GS1 2018 42Stakeholders want certainty, efficiency, safety
Industry Needs Government Needs
Certainty making planning and forecasting Accuracy with cost effective tariff verification,
easier, and automatic identification of goods
Efficiency lowering time delays Enhanced trade facilitation, with safety in
Simplification though automation and less international supply chains
cumbersome processes Efficient customs clearance and expedited
cargo movement
Smarter work in risk prevention and control
with improved regulatory compliance
GS1 standards need to be recognized as supporting digitalized customs
clearance and future regulatory traceability requirements
© GS1 2018 43World Customs Organisation (WCO)
Focusing on coordination and joint drive within WCO to promote the
recognition of GS1 standards for classification/duty collection, risk
management, and identification. Specifically:
• Support for GPC – HS Mapping by Policy Committee
• Recognition of GLN as Trader Identification
• Recognition of GTIN-GDSN/master data for product supervision
• Monitoring of GS1 Global Data Standards Projects 2.0 in AP
• Support for APEC Global Data Standards Implementation Guide
Targeting
Note: IPM gone GREEN LANE border clearance for GS1 users
© GS1 2018 44Example: Working collaboratively in Asia Pacific
Focus Areas 2018
GDS 2.0
ABAC supportive
GS1 Asia-
Pacific /
GDS next steps with WCO – GS1
Regional APEC GDS Cooperation
Industry interest in more pilots
Implementation
cooperation
Guide GPC – HS
commercial Close cooperation with Mapping
initiatives Food Industry Asia &
APEC APMEN e-port
DAB
GMS Cross-Border
World Bank Project on
Traceability
China National
Traceability System
Peru, NZ, China, Hong Kong etc.
Initiatives
Government
driven by
Led Regional
local
Cooperation
regulation Government
Led
Cross-Border
Initiatives
Supporting
GDS 2.0
© GS1 2018 66APMEN Global Data Standards Project: support the exchange of
Sea Freight data between ports, freight forwarders, cargo
owners, transport and logistics providers and Government
© GS1 2018Innovation
© GS1 2018 47MO Public Policy Engagement
Sebastián León Martinez,
GS1 Columbia
© GS1 2018 48Caso de Estudio:
Redes de Valor Agrícolas Sostenibles
La iniciativa Redes de Valor Agrícolas Sostenibles es un proyecto que nació en 2015 con el País:
apoyo de las Naciones Unidas, el ITC y GS1. En Colombia, la implementación de sus Colombia
acciones, cuenta con el aval del Ministerio de Agricultura con el propósito de mejorar la Sector/s:
productividad y la competitividad del sector agrícola a través de la implementación de Agrícola
estándares de identificación global.
Situación Enfoque
La iniciativa ofrece varios beneficios para los agricultores, como:
Programa de Naciones Unidas para el
Desarrollo 1. Acceso gratuito a la plataforma ITC, llamada Mapa de Sostenibilidad, en la que
pueden crear un perfil, en el cual logran visibilidad a nivel mundial mediante el uso
Los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible
de un GLN.
buscan terminar con el hambre y la
desnutrición para el 2030 y velar por el 2. Asignación de los GLN’s, con los cuales los agricultores podrán acceder a la
acceso de todas las personas, en especial los plataforma ITC, así como cuatro códigos de barras para identificar sus productos.
niños, a una alimentación suficiente y 3. Se brinda apoyo e información de uso, a través de capacitaciones en cada uno de
nutritiva durante todo el año. Esta tarea los municipios y departamentos del país, en donde los agricultores podrán
implica promover prácticas agrícolas empoderarse de la iniciativa y conocen sobre principios básicos de logística.
sostenibles a través del apoyo a los
pequeños agricultores y el acceso igualitario Resultados
a la tierra, la tecnología y los mercados.
Además, se requiere el fomento de la
cooperación internacional para asegurar la Se ha capacitado a más de ocho mil productores en todo el país y este proyecto
busca dar visibilidad a los agricultores colombianos con el fin de aumentar la
inversión en la infraestructura y la tecnología
comercialización y exportación. El Ministerio de Agricultura afirmó que vincularse
necesaria para mejorar la productividad
a la plataforma da la posibilidad de tener un acceso real a otro mercado, tanto
agrícola.
nacional como internacional, el cual permite mejorar los ingresos del sector agro.
Igualmente, la iniciativa vincula a empresas públicas y privadas para llegar a todos
Tomado de: los eslabones de la red de valor.
http://www.undp.org/content/undp/es/home/sustainable-
development-goals/goal-2-zero-hunger.html
© GS1 2015 49Policy opportunities
Traceability
Safety
© GS1 2018 50Product safety, GS1 and authorities
Product safety relates to issues GS1 is active in:
• Traceability
• Recall
These are also top issues in the regulators’ agendas
• Anti-counterfeiting
• Labelling
GS1 can provide its expertise to policy makers and raise awareness of
the benefits of the use of global standards to answer present and
future challenges
© GS1 2018 51Policy opportunities – for traceability GS1 is the
answer
• The advance of technology such as GPS, scanning, 4G (5G in 2020) mobile
communication networks, the Internet of Things and Blockchain is well
understood and at the cusp of opening new found opportunities
• Product identification is the foundation of these new technologies. Many
adequate internal traceability systems but external traceability between
supply chain partners is lacking
• A common data infrastructure is needed in order for external Traceability
to work in an unimpeded way
• A common language is needed for these systems to share information in an
automated way and to understand the data in the same way.
© GS1 2018 52Fighting Illicit Trade
© GS1 2018 53WHO protocol to eliminate illicit trade in tobacco products
UN Treaty ratified by
• Brazil
• Costa Rica
• Ecuador
• Nicaragua
• Panama
• Uruguay
Note: Columbia signed but has not ratified
© GS1 2018 54From WHO Protocol implementation guidelines…
“International standards are recommended for
key information (such as the manufacturing
facility, product description, time of
manufacture, intended retail market) that are
encoded in the data carrier (Article 8§4.2 of
the Protocol). For example, a Global Trade Item
Number (GTIN) is a unique and internationally
recognized identifier for a product.”
© GS1 2018 55WHO First Meeting of the Parties – MOP1
• After October 8-10, 2018 “Meeting of the Parties” countries have 5 years to
implement T & T system
• The meeting brought together government officials from different
sectors relevant for Protocol implementation, including health,
customs, justice, finance and trade
• Important for GS1– to which extent do countries need to cooperate or
are countries free to develop own system? Cooperate nationally,
regionally, globally?
© GS1 2018 56WHO First Meeting of the Parties – MOP1
Key opportunity for GS1 (from press release)
• “Delegates at MOP1 reached an agreement to create a working group to
produce a comprehensive report to showcase good practices and experiences of
State Parties in the implementation of tracking and tracing systems, and to
prepare the conceptual work in view of creating a global information-
sharing focal point to combat illicit tobacco trade”
© GS1 2018 57WHO & EU prohibition against working with
tobacco industry
• WHO and EU mandate: anyone supporting the traceability solution can only
work with the tobacco industry to the extent strictly necessary to
support government efforts to stem the illicit trade of tobacco
• Speaking with one GS1 voice is critical
• To learn more
http://mozone.gs1.org/docs/traceability/GS1_Comminication_Protocol_-
_Tobacco_Engagement_final.pdf
© GS1 2018 58Free flow of non-personal
data
© GS1 2018 59Governments looking at the free flow of non-
personal data between countries
• ALL THE key benefits of free data flows require interoperability
• Interoperability is necessary for
- EASY DIRECT PORTING OF data between cloud services
- Reducing cloud switching costs to prevent vendor lock-in
- Consolidation and sharing of data from different sources
• LAW ALONE IS NOT ENOUGH TO ESTABLISH FREE DATA
FLOWS
© GS1 2018 60What this means for standards
From the Data Foundation
• Companies’ DEMAND FOR interoperability WILL GROW AS THEY
TRY TO consolidate and share MORE data from different sources
• Capture standards may remain inconsistent
• Long-term Need for standards in capture, governance, and
portability
© GS1 2018MO Public Policy Engagement
Rubén Calonico, GS1 Argentina
© GS1 2018 62Electronic Sanitary and Phytosanitary Priorities:
Indicate
Certificate – SIGCER, SENASA priority area
• SENASA requires to migrate the Sanitary and País: Argentina
Phytosanitary Certificate System to a digital format, so
companies must use a web service for the application - Sector/s: Carne
Vacuna
SIGCER Electronic Certificates.
• For each shipment of merchandise from a Distribution
Center, Warehouse or 3PL a request must be made, and
this can result in a bottleneck and a problem in
maintaining the traceability of shipments throughout
the chain.
• As a solution it was agreed between SENASA and the
large chains represented by ASU (JRA, COTO,
CARREFOUR, LA ANONIMA, DIA) to use GS1 standards
for the identification of products and the
implementation of web services for data alignment and
document transfer
© GS1 2018 63Electronic Sanitary and Phytosanitary Priorities:
Indicate
Certificate – SIGCER, SENASA priority area
Situation Pais: Argentina
Sector/s: Carne
• GS1 Argentina has been working with SENASA in the Vacuna
digitalization of systems and procedures for
traceability and data alignment in the sectors of
Agrochemicals and Veterinary Products. Based on
this, we are working together with the Supermarkets
and Industries represented by ASU and SENASA.
• This implementation also led to the revision of
internal procedures in the companies and services of
SENASA in order to streamline processes and have
electronic information to verify the origin of the
products.
• The suitability of the operating systems in SENASA
and in GS1 Argentina is currently under development
to begin to implement this new requirement in the
Sector.
© GS1 2018 64Electronic Sanitary and Phytosanitary Priorities:
Indicate
Certificate – SIGCER, SENASA priority area
Solution Pais: Argentina
Standardize the identification of meat products using a "Grouping
Sector/s: Carne
GTIN" to code all those that are the same but with different origin. Vacuna
Use of the GTIN coding to associate the products with the SENASA
Approval N ° - CAPA (Food Product Approval Code)
Results – Benefits
• Data alignment across the supply chain using a standard identification for
fresh products.
• On-line alignment between GTIN and CAPA number to be used on the e-SPS
certificate
• Simplification of the company's internal processes to request an e-SPS
certificate, reducing operational tasks and internal costs
• Collaboration with SENASA to integrate the sector into an on-line traceability
system with prospects for greater adoption.
• New Members for GS1 Argentina and expansion of the use of our standards in
the fresh product sector.
© GS1 2018 65Key Projects with Public Policy
Priorities:
Indicate
priority area
Implemented Projects on-going
Pais: Argentina
PAMI SENASA
• Medicine-Product Identification SIGCER • Traceability of Fishery Products Sector/s: Carne
Vacuna
• SIGCER electronic SPS certificate
AFIP
Ministerio de Agroindustria
• Electronic invoice
• Dairy - Product Identification
ANMAT • Traceability of agrochemical
• Traceability of Drugs packaging.
• Traceability of medical supplies INTI
• Consumer Product Information with
SENASA
GS1 QR Code
• Traceability of Agrochemical
Products Ministerio de Seguridad
• Traceability of Veterinary Products • Trazabilidad de Precursores
Químicos
AFIP – Aduana
• Verificación y Origen de GTIN
• Uso de GDSN para simplificación de
procesos aduaneros
© GS1 2018 66Learnings – Public Policy Proposal
Between authorities
Collaborative
projects
and industry
Leverage industry’s best
Industry’s
best
practices to meet
practices regulatory requirements
Keys for a
GS1 – PP
partnership
GS1 provides expertise
in supply chain
“How to”
visibility by offering
access to global Have an
standards external advisor,
“Bronze
carácter”
Defining legal
Legal requirements and
requirements
implementing guidelines.
© GS1 2018 67Sistema de Gestión de Certificados Priorities:
Indicate
Electrónicos SIGCER priority area
SENASA requiere migrar el Sistema de Certificados sanitarios a un formato digital, para ello las empresas deben utilizar
un servicio web para la solicitud - Certificados Electrónicos SIGCER. Por cada envío de mercadería desde un Centro de Pais: Argentina
Distribución, Depósito u Operador Logístico, un usuario debe ingresar y realizar la solicitud, transformándose en un
cuello de botella y dificultad para mantener la trazabilidad de los envíos en toda la cadena. Para ello se acordó entre
SENASA y las grandes cadenas de supermercados representadas por ASU (JRA, COTO, CARREFOUR, LA ANONIMA, DIA) Sector/s: Carne
utilizar los estándares GS1 para la identificación de productos y la implementación de web services para la alineación de Vacuna
datos y transferencia de documentos.
Situación Enfoque
GS1 Argentina viene trabajando con el Estandarizar la identificación de productos cárnicos utilizando un "GTIN
SENASA en la digitalización de sistemas y
Agrupador” para codificar aquellos que son iguales pero con diferente origen.
procedimientos para trazabilidad y
Utilizar la codificación de GTIN para asociar a los productos el Nro de
alineación de datos en los sectores de
productos Agroquímicos y Productos Aprobación ante SENASA - Número CAPA (Código de Aprobación de Productos
Veterinarios. Por este motivo se está Alimenticios) tramitado por la Empresa ante SENASA para el control sanitario.
trabajando en conjunto con los
supermercados e industrias representados
por ASU y el SENASA.
Esta implementación también llevó a
Resultados
revisar procedimientos internos en las
empresas y servicios del SENASA con el fin Los beneficios esperados son: alineación de datos en toda la cadena utilizando un
de agilizar los procesos y disponer de estándar de identificación en el sector de productos frescos, actualización de los
información electrónica para verificar el datos en forma automática para permitir identificar correctamente el GTIN con el
origen de los productos. número de aprobación sanitaria. Simplificación del proceso de solicitud de
Actualmente se encuentra en desarrollo la certificados sanitarios en forma electrónica traduciéndose en la disminución de
adecuación de los sistemas operativos tareas operativas y costos internos para las empresas. Colaboración con el SENASA
tanto en SENASA como en GS1 Argentina para integrar el sector a un Sistema de trazabilidad on-line con perspectivas de
para comenzar a implementar con el mayor adopción. Nuevos socios para GS1 Argentina y difusión del uso de los
sector este nuevo requerimiento. estándares en este sector.
© GS1 2018 68Next steps / Discussion
Sharing of information and working together is a requirement to achieve regional
policy coordination and take advantage of opportunities
• What is the best way to facilitate working together regionally or bilaterally?
• What do you think are the ideas for best communicating within region?
© GS1 2018 69Want your team to learn more?
Your Global Office Public Policy Team provides training
• MO webinars on request
• Regional in-person training
• One-on-one issue management support
© GS1 2018 70Want your team to participate?
GS1 MO Public Policy Work Group
• Strategic WG of MO and GO staff engaged in any aspect of external relations to
support a common effort on public policy
GS1 LATAM Safety Authorities Work Group
• Strategic WG of LATAM MOs engaged in safety to share best practices and create
synergies
Healthcare Public Policy Working Group
© GS1 2018 71For requests or information, please contact
Elizabeth Board
elizabeth.board@gs1.org
© GS1 2018 72You can also read
