PRINZ Awards Case Studies 'best of' 2015
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS What’s in a name? – From Telecom to Spark, rebranding one of New Zealand’s best known businesses Richard Llewellyn, Andrew Pirie, Lucy Fullarton, Conor Roberts, Vicky Gray, Sam Durbin, Todd Parker, Courtney Bennett: Spark New Zealand On 21 February 2014, Telecom announced it planned to change its name to Spark New Zealand. On 8 August 2014, the change was made. One of the biggest rebrands in New Zealand’s history, it marked the culmination of a massive integrated public relations and marketing communications programme involving thousands of people and dozens of interconnected activities and initiatives. It provided a solid foundation for the new Spark New Zealand to pursue its ambition to become a winning business, inspired by customers to unleash the potential in all New Zealanders. Background Preliminary research Telecom was associated with home phones, Spot the Significant qualitative and quantitative research, including dog, and the early development of internet and mobile targeted focus groups, highlighted legacy perceptions services. Since Telecom became our name in 1987, the of the Telecom brand and reinforced the need for change. likes of fibre, video calling, smartphones, internet TV, We looked at the characteristics of successful Cloud, big data, mobility, social media and the ubiquity rebrands elsewhere. In particular, we focused on of the internet have transformed our lives. We needed telecommunications rebrands such as Orange, Sprint, to change to be more relevant to customers. O2, and BT. Closer to home, we learnt from the In late 2013, we started planning to move beyond legacy experiences of Shell rebranding to Z Energy and the brand perceptions. A new name, Spark New Zealand, ANZ merger with the National Bank. We conducted was approved in principle by the Board of Directors, desktop analysis, as well as spoke with peers. Our with a decision to unveil it at the company’s half year research identified the following seven factors as key financial results announcement on 21 February 2014. determinants of a successful rebrand: The corporate relations team conceptualised, 1. Customers determine your success orchestrated and executed a comprehensive, integrated 2. Big change occurs on multiple levels and multifaceted public relations rebrand campaign to engage with the hearts and minds of New Zealanders. 3. Staff need to feel, and be, part of the change 2
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS 4. Giving people plenty of notice about big Messages Implementation/tactics change helps draw negativity out The core key messages consistent across the The total cost of the entire rebrand was 5. Must back it up with real substance programme were: approximately $20 million. 6. Show early indicators of success »» In the last 27 years our business has The best way to describe the programme is 7. Capitalise on the energy created changed dramatically to outline the key initiatives in chronological »» We’re now into a whole raft of new order: Objectives technologies…cloud, data centres, 21 February 2014 – Announced our intention The business goal was to accelerate the internet TV, etc. to change name. It generated massive transformation of the company, outline »» We’ve innovated with public WiFi zones, reaction, managed by stakeholder relations the enormous change that had occurred Spotify, Ultra Fibre and more. and a social media war-room. and symbolise our intent to be the leading »» We’ve already changed enormously over 21 February 2014 – Announced an intention provider of digital services in New Zealand. the last 18 months. to launch a new internet TV business, Our measurable communications objectives providing an immediate proof point of our »» We’ve listened to our customers, intention to move into new types of services for the period between February and August improved services and lowered our 2014 were to: prices dramatically. 21 February 2014 – Launched a multi-faceted 1. Create more than 3 new channels to programme called Spark Should, enabling »» We are committed to listening and two-way conversations with customers on make it easier for New Zealanders to improving in the areas that matter engage with us, and grow the number of what Spark ‘should start’ or ‘should stop’. to customers. New Zealanders willing to do so. 28 February 2014 – Partnered with music »» ‘Telecom’ is a word most New Zealanders streaming service Spotify, with a supporting 2. Drive significant and measurable associate with ‘old world’ telco improvement in positive public sentiment PR campaign featuring NZ singers performing and landlines. in Auckland centres. between the first announcement and the »» ‘Spark’ is a word with life and energy that February – June 2014 – an internal change of name. links to the creativity of New Zealanders. communications programme including 3. Inform at least 40 potential media »» The reality is many New Zealanders think customer-inspired workshops, email and influencers ahead of Spark Day in order Telecom is not relevant. Spark is a new start. intranet feedback channels, videos, and to positively influence the tone of their commentary. »» We’re determined to deliver for our e-learning. customers and for the future of Mid-June 2014 – Launched www. 4. Inspire positive engagement for our New Zealand sparkiscoming.co.nz website to explain thousands of staff through a series of activities with a target of more than 80% »» For investors: the rebrand is an important publicly what Spark New Zealand will be attendance and positive engagement. investment in our future all about. 5. Generate positive conversation about 1 July 2014 – Spark ‘launch day’ announced Spark in social channels around launch Strategy as 8 August 2014 – until then, we had only day achieving at least 100,000 views, indicated the launch would be sometime in We had a clear change game-plan: likes, comments and shares. the middle of the year. »» Announce the new name in advance and 6. Influence positive coverage on the 1 July 2014 – A special 27 day countdown of start laying groundwork for change (and transformation story achieving at least 10 video interviews with employees who began also reduce the risk of a leak). positive print, radio and TV news stories at at the company in each of the 27 years »» Allow customers to share their views/ Telecom was in existence. launch and in the days following. vent – given the nature of the old Telecom July 2014 – A ‘Spark Time Capsule’ featuring brand we expected a strong reaction, so Audiences the likes of Rod Drury and Sir Ray Avery and we needed to be ‘upfront and front up’ others talking about technology. There were a number of key target from day one. audiences: Mid-July 2014 – Launched new social media »» Give it time to soak in – and make a real pages under the pending Spark brands to 1. Staff – it was critical our people became effort to listen and respond appropriately. begin building our new audiences and a new advocates of the change. »» Acknowledge our heritage. social brand. 2. Customers – customers needed to support »» Start with an internal focus, then broaden July 2014 – Staff brand immersion sessions and respond positively. externally to build awareness and support, held across NZ to deliver the key messages, 3. Influencers – influencers needed to be being conscious it’s not what we say it’s with very high engagement and message well-informed on the change. what they hear that matters. retention. 4. New Zealand public – we wanted »» Underpin the change with real substance Early August 2014 – created PR stories on potential customers to consider us, to show how we are changing (rather the logistical side of the changeover, so these particularly where Telecom had been than telling how we are changing). stories (for example signage changes) didn’t weakest (under 35’s, Auckland region, »» Build up anticipation for Spark Day (8 impact on Spark Day small business). August). 4 and 7 August – two key stakeholder 5. New Zealand media – both traditional »» Be prepared for the worst – plan cocktail events held with briefing material and non-traditional media needed to be extensively for crisis scenarios and the provided to all attendees, supported by a well informed. inevitable logistical challenges a change targeted outreach to other potential media 6. Financial analysts – analysts needed to on this scale produces. commentators understand the investment rationale. »» Pay particular emphasis on the tone 7 August – completed crisis communications of communications – to show Spark planning in the event of any technical glitches New Zealand would be a very different in the thousands of systems needing a organisation to the old Telecom. name change. »» Execute relentlessly. 3
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS 8 August – a 7am rallying call to our »» Spark is Coming – new external website Objective 4 people from Simon Moutter with a video developed with relevant video and written »» Strong engagement in brand immersion delivered via smartphone to all our people content. The website launched in May sessions with 79% attendance and a 92% in New Zealand, Australia and the Philippines and steadily increased in visibility, peaking positive reaction. 8 August – a strong paid media push – with at 470,000 page views during Spark launch week. »» Significant improvement in Organisational commercials airing on TV One, TV3 and TV2, Health Index for 2014 compared to 2013, and full-page print media ads in national »» New Spark social media handles created moving from the bottom 13% of 1,300 newspapers NZ Herald, Dominion Post, the for Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, companies worldwide, to just above 50%. Press, Otago Daily Times, Waikato Times Snapchat, with strong growth in users and National Business Review. across all (further details later in this »» Spark Day One digital message and video award entry). was watched by 75% of all staff. 8 August – more than 1,300 Spark Celebration Boxes delivered to staff in »» New Spark.co.nz consumer website »» The Spark is Coming intranet site 100 locations across New Zealand and is now the number one industry was visited 7,208 times in the weeks the Philippines, to inspire our people on website with more than 620k monthly leading up. launch day. unique visitors. »» The 27 year countdown series of videos 8 August – ‘Spark Thanks’ recognised existing »» Existing communications channels were watched over 56,000 times in total, customers with a rewards programme – online, phone, email, and investor – peaking at 3,916 views and averaged featuring an ‘Automatic-Thanks-Machine’ well employed to respond to thousands 1,500 views. (ATM), which travelled the country dishing of enquiries and comments about »» 1,300 Kiwiana themed celebration out prizes. the rebrand. packs sent to staff, with over 200 8 August – A new crowd-funding initiative, Objective 2 photos of celebrations entered in Spark My Potential, supported financially internal competition. »» UMR brand research showed by August, by Spark New Zealand to encourage support 87% of the public was aware Telecom »» An internal poll on the success of the for talented New Zealanders. was changing its name, and of that rebrand showed 82% of staff rating the group, 90% knew it was changing success of the name change as 8 or higher Creativity OR Problem solving to Spark. on a scale of 1–10. Given our repositioning as a digital services »» Analysis of social media showed reaction Objective 5 company, strong social media and online to our rebrand announcement in Feb »» Social media sentiment on 21 February engagement was going to be a key tool for 2014 was 90% negative. On August 8 2014 was 90% negative, whilst the overcoming challenges. the sentiment was 75% positive. sentiment on 8 August 2014 was On February 21, Spark/Telecom was the »» Net Promoter Score measures jumped 75% positive. number one NZ trending topic on social 13% points from March 2014 to August »» The launch day ATM video achieved over media, and the level of media commentary 2014. 100,000 views on YouTube and over was enormous. The early risk to the rebrand »» Research showing customer preference 44,000 views on Facebook in the first was significant, so we created a social media scores up across the board – with mobile 48 hours. By end of the campaign it had ‘war-room’ of over 15 staff responding to consideration up 18 points in Auckland, been watched by over 190,000 people. thousands of comments posted on various 13 points in SME, and 19 points in »» Spark’s new Snapchat channel grew from channels throughout the day. We continued post‑paid. 0–11,500 followers in the week following the momentum with the launch of Spark launch, making it the most followed Should as an online channel for customers »» Store visits increased 6% in first fortnight and increased 10.2% in the half-year to Snapchat account in New Zealand. Spark to share what they wanted to see from Spark achieved over 600,000 Snapchat story as a company. 31 December 2014 compared to the prior six month period. views in the week long, post-launch tour. Faced with the challenge of how to say »» Spark’s Instagram account grew from 300 goodbye to the old Telecom brand in the »» The spark.co.nz website now has more than 620k monthly unique visitors. Online – 3000 followers. right way we staged a 27 day count-down sales in the six months to 31 December »» Spark’s Facebook page added 8,152 Likes featuring short video interviews with a 2014 grew between 9 – 12% (depending over the course of the campaign – staff member who had started in each of on category). a 5.7% increase. the 27 years since the Telecom brand was introduced, while for media we created video Objective 3 Objective 6 content of the old Telecom signs ‘leaving the »» Two stakeholder cocktail events held with 12 national print and radio media and building’. This content was used by all major more than 200 key influencers attending, industry articles in the week leading up the national media outlets. one held for marketing and advertising launch, focusing on the logistical challenge of influencers, one for business influencers – the rebrand. Results with at least 3 influencers asked for media More than 80 print, radio and network TV Objective 1 comment subsequent to the launch. stories or discussions about the Spark rebrand »» Social/online media war room engaged »» Briefing material provided to 12 were held on 8 August, with the scope of the with approximately 3000 people who New Zealand university marketing rebrand, the ATM campaign and the Spark commented across various channels on academics, with at least 2 asked for media My Potential initiative (an associated crowd- February 21. comment subsequent to the launch. funding campaign) all getting significant »» Targeted outreach to 15 media positive mention. »» Spark Should – new channels for internal and external two way communications, commentators who had critiqued the This compares favourably with the more than with over 900 questions from customers brand change post Feb 21 2014 – while 50 print, radio and TV stories on 21 February and 200 from staff, all answered. this did not result in any public ‘mea 2014, with more than half negative in tone, culpas’ we did not have any repeat largely focused on the cost and logic behind criticisms from these commentators. the decision to rebrand. 4
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS Evaluation and follow-up Regular internal surveys – in October 2014 we asked if there had been positive change in There are several key measures Spark the company, 71% responded favourably, up New Zealand continues to track from a 24% since April 2014. reputation perspective and to measure the ongoing impact of the rebrand. Media coverage has improved significantly in the last 12–18 months, reflected by the Share price is an ongoing measure and steady increase in positive media sentiment. evaluation of how the rebrand is being received. At February 2014 the share price The ongoing and growing Spark My Potential was $2.37. By August 8 2014 the share price programme with the first six months of was $2.82, and by early March 2015 (when SMP, 37 projects launched raising a total this entry was submitted) the share price of $350,000 via crowd-funding, including was $3.29. $120,000 of matching contributions from Spark New Zealand. Between 30 June and 31 December 2014, we saw strong growth with 108,000 new mobile connections (5% Acknowledgement of other growth in a flat market) and 4,500 new communication disciplines broadband customers. Spark New Zealand corporate relations team We monitor customer preference (as a Spark’s various in-house marketing teams – precursor to market share) through research Spark Digital, Spark Home Mobile & Business quarterly, with improvement across all Spark New Zealand rebrand project office product categories since the rebrand. which coordinated logistical activities Social channels are an increasingly important Agency partners; Sherson Willis, Touchcast, influence on customer sentiment, with steady Socialites, Dynamo, Saatchi Worldwide growth in sentiment and audience numbers Design, Interbrand, Rapp, Chillbox, since Spark Day. Spur, Goodfolk UMR research benchmarks favourability against industry competitors and well- known New Zealand companies, with Spark New Zealand trending positively since the rebrand. Annual Ross Carmichael Singer investor research shows improved investor confidence in the overall Spark business strategy. 5
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS DairyNZ levy vote – demonstrating value in 2014 and beyond Hayley Gavan, Bernie Walsh, Phillipa Adam: DairyNZ In May 2014 DairyNZ faced a do or die moment – we needed a majority of dairy farmers to vote in support of continuing to pay a levy used to fund our work. The average for industry- specific levy referendums is 40 percent – we needed a turnout of at least 50 percent. As a communications team we took up the challenge and formed a plan that would create urgency around the need to vote and show dairy farmers the value of DairyNZ’s work. The result? During May, 60 percent of 14,436 eligible farmers voted and 78 percent voted ‘yes’ to continue the levy. Background Held every six years, the levy vote is required by government legislation and collected under terms set out In May 2014 New Zealand dairy farmers had the in the Commodities Levies Act 1990. Once a levy order is opportunity to vote on continuing to pay a levy to fund in place, every farmer is required to pay the levy whether a range of activities carried out by their industry body they voted ‘yes’ or ‘no’, or didn’t vote at all. DairyNZ. For the average New Zealand farm, this levy amounts to around $5,500 each year based on their milk Under the Act, a minimum of 50 percent of voting solids production. The levy amounted to $61 million in farmers need to support the levy for a new levy order funding in 2013/14. to be approved by the Minister for Primary Industries. 6
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS Ticking ‘no’ in the levy vote is effectively DairyNZ staff – DairyNZ staff are very Create urgency – build momentum in voting for no DairyNZ. For DairyNZ corporate, knowledgeable of their own projects but March and April and paint a picture of the this is effectively a do or die vote. not always aware of the breadth of activity consequences of not voting. undertaken across the organisation. They Arm the messengers – provide staff with clear Preliminary research needed to be able to tell the DairyNZ value story. messages so they too can confidently pass »» Data from an annual farmer perception Media (rural and mainstream) – DairyNZ had information on to farmers. Utilise existing survey and an annual farmer built good media relationships over time. It relationships with media, commentators and communications survey of 1000 farmers. was important to leverage off this and ensure stakeholders. Information about DairyNZ the levy campaign piqued the interest of needs to be interesting, not just to farmers. »» Four focus groups carried out in February all media. Sharpen the message – DairyNZ undertakes 2014 which tested levy branding and messaging. more than 150 projects each year. Our Messages work needs to be summarised effectively to »» Analysis of the 2008 levy vote. »» Voting provides an important opportunity resonate with farmers. for farmers to have their say. Objectives Implementation/tactics »» The more farmers who vote and who vote Organisational objective: yes, the stronger DairyNZ’s mandate to Media DairyNZ’s target: 60 percent of farmers to work on behalf of farmers. »» A proactive media release plan and story vote and 75 percent to vote yes. »» DairyNZ has a clear strategy ensuring that pipeline was developed for external media Communications objectives: dairy farmers continue to benefit from and all our own channels, including a As above, but additionally we aimed to: the levy. dedicated web page. In February and »» DairyNZ provides value to all dairy farmers March, we built awareness, in March/April »» Increase awareness of the DairyNZ Levy and has made a difference to their we promoted work in the regions and in Vote 2014 (compared to initial results in bottom line. May we created urgency around the need focus groups which indicated awareness to vote. was low). »» The breadth of DairyNZ’s work is valuable, covering all aspects of dairy farming and »» The support of media commentators was »» Increase the awareness of DairyNZ’s lesser every region. garnered. They were invited to DairyNZ known areas of work among farmers, events and provided with easy-to-digest such as disease control and policy and »» Voting is quick and easy. material. We shared regional voter turnout advocacy by 50 percent (based on the figures throughout the voting period to previous year’s farmer perception survey). Strategy drive stories and interest. »» Increase the awareness of DairyNZ’s work Show value – encourage farmers to take »» Every media release during March, April among media and key stakeholders – a an interest in DairyNZ’s work, see the and May had a levy vote message in it. story will be published in every provincial value and understand the impact it has on farming page in April and May. »» There was strong engagement with key their business. rural media to keep stories fresh, targeted »» Increase the voter turnout of sharemilkers and top of mind. from 37 percent in 2008 to at least 50 percent in 2014. »» There were efforts to drive interest on business and provincial farming pages Audiences particularly on economics, future of business, challenges and competitiveness We needed to target our campaign to using DairyNZ experts. particular segments of farmers. Stakeholders Large herd owners – they pay the highest levies and produce more milksolids as a »» A media pack was sent to dairy industry group (the weighted milksolids results also partners, including dairy companies and count under the legislation). It was especially farmer groups. important to express the dollar value of »» Organisations’ chief executives and DairyNZ’s work to this group. spokespeople were asked to write opinion Sharemilkers – over 4000 in number, but pieces and include information in their generally unaware of their ability to vote on own communications. Short stories were the levy. In the 2008 vote, the sharemilker supplied for them to distribute. turnout was considerably lower than for »» We worked in partnership with Federated owner-operators (37 percent vs 58 percent). Farmers’ sharemilkers section and a We recognised an opportunity to lift sharemilking DairyNZ board member to their vote. develop joint media releases and tailored Farmer-led organisations and milk supply messages that focused on lifting the companies, e.g. Federated Farmers – their sharemilkers’ vote. support was crucial. They have their own Internal communication communication channels and could endorse »» Levy communication resources were the value of DairyNZ’s levy-funded activities created for our staff. An acronym, and promote the vote. PREPARE, was used to help our people Farmers by region – one of the key strengths answer the question ‘what do dairy of DairyNZ is its ability to tailor and deliver farmers get for their levy’? regionalised information and services through »» We provided ‘booster backpacks’ for staff, regional teams on the ground. We needed to branded with the catch-phrase – ‘to levy communicate this. 2014 and beyond’. It included a guide to 7
CORPORATE PUBLIC RELATIONS the levy and other resources to support good stories. Farmers told us that farm profit Evaluation and follow-up and motivate staff. and scientific research were most important »» A project debrief workshop was held Direct-to-farmer to them. We stuck to the facts, using and produced a report of learnings. Our evidence to back up any value statements. »» Regionalised monthly e-newsletters communications work stream fed into this We supplemented this with farmer were used as a channel to help build review process and we also conducted our endorsements. momentum over March, April and May. own team debrief. We carefully planned out messages and »» We are now advising others on levy used testimonials from farmers and Results campaigns. Dairy Australia and Beef and stakeholders. Specific messages were The results of the vote exceeded DairyNZ’s Lamb NZ have both sought our advice created for large herd owners. goal with 60 percent of 14,436 eligible this year. »» Social media, including Facebook and farmers voting and 78 percent voting »» We held a media debrief at the June 2014 Twitter was used to target groups that ‘yes’ to continue the levy. The turnout Mystery Creek Fieldays with our senior were likely to use online media e.g. was well above the average for industry- staff. This resulted in video stories on-line sharemilkers. We also enlisted supporting specific levy referendums (turnout average about the success of the work. organisations to use their own social according to election specialists Electionz. com is 40 percent). In addition we lifted the »» We produced an infographic one page networks. sharemilkers’ voter turnout to 50 percent results flyer that was shared widely with »» Two information guides were sent (up from 37 percent in 2008’s levy vote). This media, stakeholders and staff. Staff shared to farmers in March and May 2014, was a record result. it on their Facebook pages and pinned it explaining the vote and demonstrating up at desks, building staff morale. the value of DairyNZ to dairy farmers. Four DairyNZ conducts a farmer perception survey every year. In 2014, 1000 farmers were »» We also publicly thanked farmers for voting key priority areas were created, based on surveyed between May 23 and July 6. in all our media channels and publications. earlier research into the types of messages that best resonated with farmers. »» In response to ‘why did you not vote?’, »» DairyNZ board chairman John Luxton only 8 percent indicated they didn’t know summed up the campaign with a »» A ‘levy issue’ of our monthly Inside Dairy the vote was happening. Only 9 percent comment to our communications magazine was produced and distributed said they didn’t know what the vote was manager. “Overall it has been a great to farmers in March. about. success, so well done.” Budget »» Unprompted farmer awareness of our »» We measured our performance by the $14,000 (printing of information booklets for activities increased significantly in specific vote result (a record result, higher than staff and farmers) areas we had targeted (advocacy with any previous votes) and the DairyNZ decision-makers 11 percent, up from Farmer Perception survey, level and tone Creativity OR Problem solving 2 percent in 2013; awareness of work of media coverage and levels of farmer We identified two specific challenges. in promoting the industry 20 percent, engagement with our communication up from 12 percent in 2013; research channels and contact points. In the 2014 Voter apathy and development 15 percent up from farmer communications survey, 68 percent The corporate PR/communications part of 11 percent in 2013; disease control of farmers said they became more aware the campaign had to build urgency and 12 percent, up from 2 percent in 2013). of our work through key channels like motivation. At the same time we were Inside Dairy magazine (up from 47 percent »» At the same time we maintained our conscious that this was a democratic vote. in 2013). general high support with farmers, with The primary objective was to encourage 9 out of 10 farmers saying they would »» We continue to focus on evidence- farmers to vote, and to see the value in vote to have DairyNZ continue operating. based data and regionalisation in our continuing the levy. There was a strong focus communications, including our 2013/14 on providing sufficient information to ensure DairyNZ’s corporate media relations resulted Annual Report. voters could make an informed choice. in the following. »» Our media relationships and their The communications team ensured that top »» 168 articles mentioning DairyNZ’s levy understanding of DairyNZ have people in the organisation understood the vote being printed and broadcast from strengthened. importance of developing key messages and March until June. expanding on them at short notice. A weekly »» A wide range of media using our Acknowledgement of other meeting helped cement this and update the material. The list included TV3’s 6 o’clock wider levy campaign team. news, RadioNZ, regional metro dailies communication disciplines (including Dominion Post, Waikato Times, The DairyNZ communications team worked We constantly monitored and adjusted Christchurch Press, Otago Daily Times) alongside other areas of the business to our messages and activities to keep the and community newspapers. deliver an integrated levy vote campaign. media momentum right to the end of the voting period. »» We reached every region from the A project manager, Jodi Tong, worked Northland Advocate to the Southland with our Senior Leadership Team to lead Too much information the campaign, with an above the line Times. We had a lot to say and we had to branded advertising campaign in print and »» Rural publications featured the levy vote capture the attention of a busy and varied broadcast media, complementing our team’s prominently. A front page of Dairy News constituency of voters. DairyNZ’s work communications and public relations strategy. was dedicated to the vote. covers everything from scientific research We were also ably assisted by our digital and to investing in disease control, policy and Our internal communications was also design team, including Lisa Ballantyne (senior advocacy and water quality. Nailing the successful. graphic designer), Monica Pooley (graphic messages and tailoring to our different »» Staff were comfortable facing questions designer), David Borgioli-Jones (digital regions and audiences took time and effort. when tasked with calling all farmers specialist), Jo Gisborne (digital specialist), The solution was to use research to help to remind them of the vote. Around Laura Nola (administrator). develop our messages and work closely with 90 percent of staff called farmers and All DairyNZ staff participated in engagement media to give them what they needed for answered their questions. to promote voting directly with farmers. 8
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS Gig-borne: The city that dared to dream Kerry Donovan, Nicola Chrisp: ExpressPR Like David vs. Goliath, Gigatown was an epic battle of community spirit vs. population size. 50 NZ towns, one prize: The fastest internet in the Southern Hemisphere. Gisborne struggled from the outset. There was little understanding of ultra-fast broadband (UFB) and many struggled with the digital accessibility and proficiency required to get involved. ExpressPR’s community-driven campaign united the entire community, daring them to dream big. Through army-style infiltration, a crash course in social media and tireless effort, Gisborne changed its paradigm. We came second to a city four times our size, by just 0.2%. Background Preliminary research Gigatown, a year-long Chorus competition, saw 50 Research objectives towns compete for one-gigabit-per-second internet and »» Identify the best way to engage people in $700,000. Town-specific hashtags earned points through the competition. seven social media platforms. »» Kick-start engagement, involving key influencers from The Gisborne District Council (GDC) managed the beginning. Gisborne’s campaign, supported by Eastland Community Trust (ECT). With the lowest internet access in NZ »» Research questions and high deprivation statistics, Gisborne was ready »» Why is our community unengaged? for transformation. »» What community sectors would benefit from UFB Winning Gigatown was the goal. But, the real prize and how? would be widespread community engagement, »» What platforms should we focus on? improved digital literacy and Gisborne’s compelling story Primary research told globally. Client briefings, interviews and focus groups Six months in and 11th place, Gisborne looked out of the encompassing stakeholders such as iwi, businesses, race. Enter ExpressPR – executing a strategy to transform schools, health, government, IT sector and a town of disbelievers into an undeniable force. wider community. 9
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS Secondary research 2. Increase active engagement to 40% of Messages Desktop research confirmed Gisborne’s high Gisborne’s population by November 18, Key messages involved: deprivation statistics, a compelling story 2014. »» How: Competition information and and Gisborne’s competitive advantage. Measurability: participation instruction. Highest users of social media were women, »» Facebook likes achieve 1000% growth. 18–44 yrs. »» Why: Social and economic benefits. »» Five Facebook posts daily receive more Research found two main engagement »» Why Gisborne: Vote for Gisborne. than 150 comments. barriers: Overarching message »» 100 people tweet 100 times daily. »» Lack of competition and UFB “Gigatown Gisborne will be a leading digital understanding. »» 1500 people participated in the monthly hub, driving global connectivity, economic quiz. »» Low digital proficiency and accessibility. and social development and world class »» The project recruits more than 200 education, changing how our community volunteers. lives, works and plays.” Objectives »» 10 community-driven events, projects Key message one: “Getting involved is easy!” Winning Gigatown was the ultimate or campaigns executed. objective, supporting: 1. Register at www.gigatown.co.nz. »» 150 new Twitter registrations. »» GDC in “leading and supporting 2. Complete the quiz. Go to www.gigatown. the social, cultural, economic and co.nz/take-the-quiz. environmental development of [its] Audiences 3. 10@10. Take 10 minutes at 10am to post communities” and; The town with the loudest voice wins, #gigatowngis on Facebook, Twitter or »» ECT in “creating a positive, prosperous therefore, target audiences were those that: Instagram. and attractive community.” »» encapsulated the most people; Key message two: “Business done better.” Project objectives: »» were motivated by fast, affordable internet; »» Winning will drive business growth and 1. Increase Gisborne’s digital proficiency by »» and were able to participate. development, and create new, higher November 18, 2014. These included: paying jobs. Measurability: Local businesses: Community employers with Key message three: “Maximising potential.” »» 500 people social media trained. large databases. Businesses would benefit »» Winning will maximise our people’s »» One proficiency focused initiative from efficiency and productivity gains, cloud potential. It will transform our education implemented. access and improved communications. system, improving digital accessibility Entrepreneurs: Winning would support and literacy. 2. Increase social media participative democracy by November 2014. start-ups and innovation, and drive Key message four: “Bringing people together.” economic development – with entrepreneurs »» Winning will unite our community, Measurability: maximising Gisborne’s work-life balance. connect us with whanau globally and »» Gigatown Facebook community posts Community influencers: Widespread spotlight Gisborne on the world stage. receive over 200 comments. engagement depended on passionate Gisborne also had to convince Chorus, judges »» GDC Facebook page grows 25% by community leaders seeing value in winning and New Zealand that it should be Gigatown. November 2014. and actively enlisting support. Key external messages: 3. Showcase Gisborne as a great place to Education providers: Schools were major live, throughout the competition. competition beneficiaries and large »» We are Gig-borne. Measurability: community communicators. UFB would »» Gisborne is the best platform to showcase transform education accessibility, delivery UFB’s transformative power. »» Gisborne’s digital strategy video receives and communication. »» Gisborne is on the edge. Paradigms 1000 hits. Health providers: Another large employer, innovate from the edge, ideas are born »» Gisborne’s story attracts national media health and social service providers would on the edge, disruption comes from coverage at least once. benefit from reduced service delivery costs, the edge. »» Gisborne attracts one new investor as a improved access to tools, services and shared »» Gisborne is the place talent chooses to live. result of Gigatown. patient data. »» Gisborne has the funding, drive and PR objectives: Iwi: Maori represents 50% of Gisborne’s capacity to incite change. 1. Increase awareness of the competition population. The two main iwi had large networks fundamental to winning. UFB »» Gisborne will share its story with the world. and UFB benefits to 90% of the community by November 2014. would improve iwi standards of living and Measurability: global whanau connectivity. Strategy Local government: Potential Gigatown One thing was clear. One person could not »» Minimum 500 Gisborne businesses deliverer and large employer, its outreach do this alone. Winning would require a mass are contacted. programmes were fundamental to community-wide effort. »» 90% of IT professionals, education and project communication. Gisborne was in 11th place, winning was health providers are approached. IT Sector: Winning Gigatown would catapult no longer about building momentum, but »» Monthly communication with GDC growth in the IT sector. building it faster than the competition, which employees. had a six month head start. Mothers aged 18–44: The largest habitual »» Public meetings attract 50–100 social media users and key communicators, First place seemed an almost impossible task. people each. mothers would be the biggest converters Gisborne had to systematically and patiently »» Weekly local media engagement. of others. knock off the competition, one by one. 10
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS There were two components to the strategy. Social Media Solution:”Twitter Tuesday” and 1. Secure a large, sustainable network of High frequency social media tactics grew daily “Facebook Friday.” people to lead and inspire the community. engagement. Topics included: Informal, peer-led training was held weekly 2. Provide the tools and resources for them »» Competition rules and UFB benefits. with beer and pizza, or coffee and morning to recruit mass community engagement. tea. Community facilitated, they promoted »» Dare to dream – what could Gisborne self education and fostered a supportive There were 10 steps on the ladder, ten towns look like with UFB? Giga-family. that had to surrender by force, military »» Games and competitions. style. All communications focused on the immediate competitor, breaking the massive Motivational tactics: Results climb into achievable targets. »» Transparency: Leader boards and graphs Gisborne came second, losing to Dunedin The PR strategy was simple: were posted online, driving ownership by 0.2%. Judges voted Gisborne’s digital and momentum. strategy best. Winners regardless, Gisborne’s »» Tell Gisborne’s compelling story, illustrating engaged community is committed to digital the need for UFB. »» Gig-Shed: Army HQ, named because all good innovation comes from a kiwi shed, excellence, with the world spotlight on its »» Communicate clear vision and goals, was a supportive space manned 24/7 by digital journey. sharing project ownership and soldiers who cheered, hugged, laughed Project objectives: empowering the community. and cried at every 0.1% increase. Increase digital proficiency by November 18, »» Don’t ask, inspire people to get involved. »» Celebrating success: Big or small, 2014. »» Work with supporters in the way they are achievement was celebrated through »» Over 500 twitter registrations, 19,000 able. Any contribution is valued. events, and printed and social media. email registrations. »» Represent Gisborne with integrity and Budget: »» Over 500 attended training brand consistency. To Finale: (May–Sep 14): $18.8k »» Mind Lab’s digital teacher academy »» Celebrate success, big or small. Finale: (Sep–Nov 14): $77.5k established. »» Say thank you, sincerely and Increase social media participative democracy wherever possible. Creativity OR Problem solving by November 2014. Gisborne’s deprivation statistics and late kick- »» Gigatown Facebook posts achieved 2–5k Implementation/tactics start meant it had to get creative. Dunedin comments each. The Giga-Army was born. Its mission: Become was a formidable opponent, four times »» GDC Facebook followers doubled, now an unstoppable force. Gisborne’s population with big budgets and one of the highest followed council pages The challenge was maintaining high levels of university networks. in New Zealand. engagement. Multiplication was crucial. A Examples of creative problem solving »» Showcase Gisborne as a great place to fun, military campaign was embraced whole- Problem: No signage budget. live, throughout the competition. heartedly, involving: Solution: “Paint the town Giga.” »» Gisborne’s digital strategy video received Marshalls: The steering committee, to which 7386 plays. the major general reported. Hundreds of soldiers met in camouflage, armed with art supplies and homemade signs »» Gisborne received the most national Major General: Project manager, responsible to “Paint the town Giga”, led by Gisborne’s coverage including two TV appearances. for strategy and stakeholder management. mayor. Retailers and GDC pre-approved »» Mind Lab invested technology and Colonels: Ambassadors and activators – the town’s overnight transformation teaching scholarships. report to the major general. including replacing “Gisborne” signs with “Gig‑Borne”. »» Chorus have promised local investment. Platoons: A drafted organisation. Platoons represented all community sectors. Problem: Gisborne’s small in comparison Gisborne exceeded its expectations, punching population size. well above its weight with engagement far Captains: Platoon representatives responsible greater than its population size. for activating soldiers, supported by other Solution: The “Hundy Club.” captains, reporting to the major general. PR Objectives: Social media badges were awarded to Soldiers: Platoon members who earn points soldiers tweeting 100, 200 and 500 times Increase awareness of the competition and as instructed by their captain. daily. Recipients wore their badge as their UFB benefits among 90% of the community profile picture. by November 18, 2014. Ammunition Problem: Low internet accessibility. »» Almost 100% of community sectors The Giga-Army needed ammunition. reached by the Giga-Army. This included: Solution One: “10@10.” »» Engagement unlike anything before. »» A website. Businesses permitted employees to use social Gisborne shut down in the final days with »» Printed marketing collateral and digital media for 10 minutes at 10am using work community-wide focus. templates. time and technology. In its peak, hours were donated with factories halting production, »» Over $15,000 (cash and in kind) donated »» 4G tablets. retailers closing, even Tairāwhiti District by the community. Media Health and GDC staff tweeted. »» An estimated 1000 people celebrated The Gisborne Herald, renamed The Gig-Borne Solution Two: “The Gig-Shed.” making the finale at the Gig-Shed. The Herald, regularly printed media releases, grand finale was live streamed with Open 24/7, The Gig-Shed provided access to thousands watching. often front page. Gisborne received the most technology, internet and training. national media coverage. »» Over $100,000 advertising was donated Problem: Poor digital literacy and social by The Gig-Borne Herald. media knowledge. 11
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS »» The Gig-Shed was manned 24/7 by Success of social media tactics was analysed Acknowledgement of other over 200 soldiers, constantly hosting using this real time information and adjusted communication disciplines 20–100 people. accordingly to maximise engagement, The Gigatown Gisborne campaign was Increase engagement to 40% of Gisborne’s making every point count. It also became a people management and community population by November 18, 2014. the benchmark for future GDC social media engagement programme build around engagement tactics. »» Gigatown Gisborne Facebook grew networking, positive media coverage, from 1200 – 13,000, achieving 491% Physical community engagement effective use of social media (the foundation growth in month one, the largest regional The project was evaluated by: of the entire competition) and providing the Facebook page. »» Attendance at events, training and Giga-Army with the tools they needed enlist »» Facebook posts achieved 40–60,000 reach meetings. support. (Gisborne’s population – 36,000). Posts »» Amount of donated media coverage. Tools included a website, and limited printed generated up to 5,000 link clicks and material such as flyers, stickers, posters 2,000–5,000 comments each. »» Gig-Shed foot traffic. and t-shirts, designed by ExpressPR. The »» 100–500 people posted 100–1000 »» Number of platoons drafted. Giga-Army was often seen at public events, tweets daily. What happens next? armed with tablets to recruit volunteers and registrations. »» 1500–3000 quiz entries, monthly. The community is still fired up, engaged and working to execute its Plan for Gig Success. There was no newspaper spend, however »» Over 50 community-driven events. The Gisborne Herald became heavily The original marshals have been joined by »» Approximately 500 new Twitter other community leaders and meet monthly engaged and donated over $100,000 in registrations. to govern the implementation of key digital free advertising and support with regular initiatives. The project, now labelled the media updates. Evaluation and follow-up Digital Strategy, has been formally adopted Many businesses used tools developed by Measuring success was easy, through real by Activate Tairāwhiti (Gisborne’s economic ExpressPR for the campaign to reach out to time monitoring of social media hashtags. development agency) and a digital strategy their networks, including electronic direct One correctly used hashtag earned the manager has been employed. mail templates and e-signatures. community one point. The Giga-Army has begun initial discussion ExpressPR would like to sincerely thank Social Media around sourcing crowd-funding for specific the following Marshalls of the Giga- initiatives and will continue to play a key role Army: Gisborne District Council, Eastland »» The Gigatown website (www.gigatown. in community development. Community Trust, The Gisborne Herald and co.nz) kept track of each town’s overall Gisborne has joined forces with other finalist Pultron Composites. Their foresight, tireless progress. towns to work towards becoming a Gig- support and guidance was invaluable. »» A supporting website (ur.co.nz/Gigatown. Nation, supporting New Zealand’s drive for php) measured results specific to each digital excellence. It aims to join the global platform. Tweeters used this site to digital conversation and become part of the track daily performance and stay within gig city network. competition rules. The overall community feeling is that »» Hashtags.org measured frequency of Gisborne are true winners, receiving wide hashtags at specific times of the day. reaching benefits that far extend the scope of »» Facebook analytics measured success the competition. of each post by reach, link clicks and comments. 12
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS ‘Are you that someone?’ – Preventing sexual violence Hanna Kilpin, Janice Rodenburg: Ideas Shop New Zealanders were shocked to hear of ’Roast Busters’ – a group of teenage boys who were boasting online about getting girls drunk and raping them. Media coverage of the scandal and public debate reinforced the need to raise awareness among young people about what constitutes sexual violence, and to equip them with the confidence and knowledge to safely intervene to stop it happening. The Ministry of Social Development and Ideas Shop developed a pilot campaign targeting young people aged 16–21 years old to help them see the signs, safely speak up and step in to prevent sexual violence. Background New Zealanders aged 16–21 years in a conversation about how and when they could speak up and step in The ‘Roast Busters’ controversy highlighted that many to stop sexual violence. The campaign needed to be young New Zealanders are confused about what is and developed and go live within three months, prior to the isn’t appropriate sexual behaviour, with one in five female election campaign period. and one in 10 male high school students in New Zealand reporting unwanted sexual contact or being made to do unwanted sexual things (Source: ACC). Those working Preliminary research with victims of sexual violence report that victims usually Our preliminary research focused on gaining an in-depth know the perpetrators, and the events leading up to the knowledge of the audience, the way they communicate assault are often witnessed by others. However many and their understanding of sexual violence. This bystanders do not feel confident to intervene. information was critical to developing the right tone and As a first step in the Government’s broader sexual style for the campaign. violence prevention strategy, the Ministry of Social Three focus groups were held with representatives of the Development (MSD) wanted to move quickly to help target audience, providing us with: young people become active bystanders by providing »» current attitudes and understanding of sexual violence them with the knowledge and confidence to recognise and react to inappropriate sexual behaviour. »» barriers to stepping in to prevent it Ideas Shop was commissioned to work with MSD to »» common areas of misinformation develop and implement a 10 week campaign to engage We consulted with sector groups working with victims of sexual violence, to draw on their experiences with the audience and test the approach of the campaign through its development. We recognised that social media was a key communication channel for the demographic and conducted desktop research into trends and the audience’s preferred social media platforms and usage. Due to the limited time frame and budget we could not undertake research to set benchmarks of awareness or behaviour prior to the campaign beginning. Objectives The campaign needed to support the Government’s broader sexual violence prevention strategy and complement other MSD social marketing campaigns. The overall goal of the campaign was to initiate behaviour change by giving young New Zealanders the knowledge and confidence to recognise and respond to inappropriate sexual behaviour. The campaign objectives were to: »» Create awareness about what constitutes sexual violence and how to safely intervene, with a target of reaching 10% of the target audience. Targets were based on a proportion of the reach of other MSD social marketing activity. »» Generate online conversation to prompt and influence positive behaviour change, with a target of 10,000 conversations over the 10-week campaign (measured through Facebook and Twitter engagement statistics). 13
GOVERNMENT OR QUASI GOVERNMENT PUBLIC RELATIONS Audiences reference group in the target age group. At language were all tested with focus groups to the same time, experienced senior advisors ensure they were relevant and recognisable. Our primary audience for the campaign were on the lookout for any unintended As a result of the feedback, we used actors, was New Zealanders aged 16–21 years, consequences from the messaging, for rather than models, so that we could be sure approximately 444,000 people. example making sure there was no sense of the facial expressions and body language Research shows that this age group is ‘victim blaming’. of everyone in the framed scenario clearly statistically at the highest risk of sexual signalled the behaviour was unacceptable. assault, particularly as they are in the The visuals were complemented by the four process of learning about sexuality and Strategy key messages (see above). managing sexual relationships. They are Our strategy had to engage the audience, show them what to look for and suggest Our images were displayed as posters around also experimenting with alcohol, which is ways to speak up and step in safely when areas frequented by young people – near bars a known risk factor for sexual violence and seeing sexual violence. and entertainment venues and on campuses, unwanted sexual experiences. with a call to action to visit the Facebook Our focus group findings told us that there To do this in the most effective way and page or Twitter account. was a desire and feeling of obligation enable conversation with the target audience, we developed a primarily social media Social media: to intervene in potentially dangerous situations, but they struggled to know based campaign, supported by visual paid We set up Facebook and Twitter accounts which situations warranted intervention, advertising and non-paid media. where we shared the images, asked noting that there were consequences from High impact visuals: questions and encouraged comments and misreading situations. discussion about ways to intervene safely. A The campaign material needed to be conversation calendar was developed which We also knew this audience is strongly simple and highly visual, grab the attention covered a range of elements dealing with influenced by their peers, and use social of the audience, and be confronting by sexual violence and included crowd-sourcing media as a primary communication channel reflecting ‘real life’ situations that they would ‘real life’ situations the audience found to connect and share information. find themselves in. The catchphrase and themselves in, and facilitated conversation Given the sensitive nature of the material messaging were integrated into these visuals. around these situations. We also included and substantial public interest in the topic, It was important that these could translate references to relevant pop-culture and it was important to reach a secondary across the ‘real world’ and our digital encouraged participation by giving away audience including stakeholders such as key platforms, and drive the audience to the small vouchers. community and sector groups working with campaign’s social media pages. We monitored the impact of each post and victims of sexual violence, and parents and Social media: applied the lessons learnt; for example we families ensuring they were prepared should Key to our strategy was using social media found pop-culture references were popular so young people come to them with issues as a campaign information hub, where we emphasised those. In addition to our own prompted by the campaign material. the audience could actively participate in content, we linked to relevant material from conversations, access tools to help them around the world to keep the page fresh and Messages safely intervene, and share experiences and broaden the appeal. The campaign’s messages needed be ideas on how to step in safely and stop Prior to going live, the Ideas Shop team authentic and relevant to our target sexual violence. was trained to be able to respond audience. MSD recognised this and was appropriately to sensitive issues, such as Digital meets the real world: willing to push boundaries and use a disclosures from victims of sexual violence, deliberately edgy bold look and feel. We knew from previous social marketing or naming perpetrators. Understanding experience that the campaign could not be Working collaboratively with the client and that responsiveness was a key to success, solely digitally based and needed a physical a design agency, we developed the ‘Are you Ideas Shop scenario-planned responses presence. To deliver this and drive the that someone? Let’s stop sexual violence’ and actions, which also helped to mitigate audience to the campaign’s social media catchphrase, aimed at prompting reflection the impact of people posting difficult or channels, universities and specialist sexual and discussion when confronted with inappropriate comments. violence prevention educators were given inappropriate sexual behaviour. This was Digital meets the real world: tools and collateral to run student-led events followed by the tagline, ‘See the signs, speak throughout the country. At the same time, Working with tertiary institutions and up, step in safely, stop sexual violence’. posters were displayed in areas that the campaign partners such as Rape Prevention We also developed four key messages target audience frequent including pubs, Education (RPE), we held events on six to draw the audience into the visuals. tertiary and secondary campuses. campuses to help crowd-source content for These were: the social media channels and engage directly »» Someone should tell him he’s being a dick Implementation/tactics with the target audience. Using a pop-up – Are you that someone? The total budget for the campaign was photo booth, we photographed students »» Someone should tell him to back off – $290,000, with $154,000 of the budget holding up a white board displaying their Are you that someone? dedicated to public relations. personal strategy to prevent sexual violence, with a statement beginning ‘I am someone »» Someone should check she’s OK with High impact visuals: who…’ Participants shared their photos that – Are you that someone? We developed four visually arresting images across social media, broadening the reach of »» Someone should stop them, she’s too showing scenarios where a young woman is the campaign messages and influencing their wasted – Are you that someone? at risk of sexual violence or unwanted sexual peers to get behind the campaign. Supporting messages included practical tips contact is taking place. In each scenario Refocussing activity: to help the audience safely step in or speak the body language and messaging makes it clear that the behaviour is not acceptable Despite research showing that Twitter was up against sexual violence. a channel used frequently by the target and suggests that ‘someone’ should To get an authentic voice, all content was audience, the campaign’s Twitter audience do something. written by younger members of staff who appeared to be older and primarily interested then tested messaging with an informal The proposed approach, scenarios and the observers, such as people working with 14
You can also read