Preserving User Privacy Through Ephemeral Sharing Design: A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment in the Online Dating Context Abstract - CSWIM 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Preserving User Privacy Through Ephemeral Sharing Design: A Large-Scale Randomized Field Experiment in the Online Dating Context Abstract Communication cold-start problems are pervasive in privacy-sensitive settings. To address those problems, our research examined ephemeral sharing as a privacy-preserving mechanism to navigate the balance between users’ privacy concerns and information sharing in the initial interaction stages in online dating. In partnership with Summer, a leading online dating platform, we report a large-scale randomized field experiment with over 70k users to understand how ephemeral sharing influences users’ information sharing behavior and subsequent match outcomes. We find that the subjects in the ephemeral group achieves a significantly larger number of personal photos along with their matching request, a more significant number of initial matches, and higher conversational engagement from receivers. Further, our sequential mediation tests further show that the increased sharing of personal photos is the primary mechanism. Our study contributes to the literature on the design of matching platforms and provides actionable implications for the privacy-preserving design of matching platforms. Keywords: Ephemeral sharing, online dating, privacy-preserving design, information disclosure, randomized field experiment 1. Introduction Online dating platforms, such as Bumble, Tinder, and Coffee Meets Bagel, have become important avenues for individuals to meet and date in recent years. It was reported that almost 40% of young couples met their partners online, and the global users of online dating platforms are estimated to exceed 441.8 million by 2024 (Rosenfeld et al. 2019; Statista 2020). Given the outsized role of online dating platforms in the dating market, how to optimally design these platforms is of crucial interest (Constantinides et al. 2018). Notably, a primary goal of online dating platforms is to help users find their ideal dates by connecting users with potential dates and facilitating the subsequent communication between them. However, a key challenge the online dating platform is plagued with is the communication cold-start problems, wherein users’ privacy concerns lead to the withholding of personal information in the initial interactions, which hinders trust-building and consequently effective communication. Users of online dating platforms are rather secretive and highly concerned about their privacy (Lutz & Ranzini 2017; Shi & Viswanathan 2020). As they engage in online social interaction with strangers, users of online dating platforms fear their identity and other sensitive personal information can be abused by users with ill-intentions (scams and catfishing) (Cobb & Kohno 2017). Therefore, driven by privacy concerns, users of online dating platforms, particularly in the initiation phase, often refrain from voluntary sharing of personal information. For example, many users do not voluntarily provide their personal profile pictures to avoid revealing their real Identity (Hall et al. 2010). As a result, even if the two partners are matched, their communication becomes iced. However, a lack of self-disclosure is debilitating for an online dating platform wherein reducing information asymmetry between two partners is crucial for a successful match. The users who provide limited information about themselves are likely dismissed by their prospective dating partners who also try to avoid connecting and disclosing their personal information to strangers
whom they know little about. Moreover, a lack of personal disclosure can lead to information asymmetry, such that it is hard to be sure that the user is authentic and trustworthy (John et al. 2016). To address such concerns, digital platforms typically implement reputation systems or dispute systems (Burtch et al. 2021). However, it is rare for online dating platforms to allow users to rate or dispute the dating experiences, thus constraining the possibilities of addressing information asymmetry issues. To address the communication cold-start problems, we propose a privacy-preserving ephemeral sharing mechanism for use by dating match senders during their matching requests in online dating platforms. Ephemeral sharing refers to the digital design that content (usually photos or video) shared by a sender will be purged shortly after it reaches the intended receiver (Xu et al. 2016). Ephemeral sharing has been previously adopted by social communication platforms such as Snapchat and Telegram to increase the freedom of self-expression (Vaterlaus et al. 2016). The literature has shown that ephemeral sharing can affect what they share on social communication platforms (Piwek & Joinson 2016) and how much users communicate with their social ties (Bayer et al. 2020). Unlike social communication platforms, online dating platforms use ephemeral sharing in the match formation phase wherein the two ends are still strangers rather than between established ties. To our knowledge, the effect of ephemeral sharing on match formation has not been examined. It is not immediately clear what the effect of ephemeral sharing on match outcomes would be. On the one hand, by encouraging self-disclosure, ephemeral sharing may lead to more revelation (e.g., personal photo) about the sender, alleviate information asymmetry, and facilitate matching. On the other hand, ephemeral sharing can potentially cause receivers to pay less attention to the request sender due to the limited time the photo is available. Further, it may even lead to the revelation of unfavorable information, possibly leaving a negative impression on the receivers (Hofstetter et al. 2017). Beyond the effect of ephemeral sharing on the match outcomes, we are also interested in whether it addresses the communication cold-start issue, as a majority of the matches do not lead to further engagements (Bapna et al. 2016). Bearing the above discussion in mind, our study investigates the following research questions. • How does ephemeral sharing affect information sharing behavior and initial matches (i.e., approved matching requests) in online dating platforms? • How does ephemeral sharing alleviate communication cold-start problems in online dating platforms? We conduct a large-scale randomized field experiment in partnership with Summer, a leading online dating platform in China. Our experiment employs a between-subjects, user-level design with two groups: a control group where sender-shared photos are persistent and a treatment group where such photos are ephemeral. The subjects are informed by the user interface (UI) of the request page in the treatment group that the photo they share during a matching request will be ephemeral (“the photo will only be viewable for five seconds and then no longer available”). In contrast, subjects in the control group can only upload a regular (i.e., persistent) photo. Subjects in both groups decide whether to include a photo in each of their matching requests. Our field experiment generates a series of findings. First, subjects in the treatment (ephemeral photo) group send more matching requests with personal photos. Besides, these subjects achieve significantly more initial matches and, more importantly, higher conversational engagement from the receiver. Second, our causal mechanism tests suggest that the observed effect on the match outcomes is fully explained by the increases in requests with photos, i.e., the information sharing
promoted by ephemeral sharing. The sequential mediation tests further show that the increased sharing of personal photos increases the dating request receivers’ conversational engagements. Our study contributes to the literature on the design of digital platforms and the emerging literature on ephemeral design. First, our paper is the first to introduce a novel privacy-preserving design, ephemeral sharing, to encourage the disclosure of personal information to facilitate better match outcomes on online dating platforms. The ephemeral sharing design, building on the line of research on privacy-preserving designs, addresses the privacy-authenticity dilemma as we uncover whether and how this mechanism drives desirable behavioral change. Second, our paper contributes to the literature on ephemeral sharing (Piwek & Joinson 2016; Pu et al. 2020). It is among the first to deliberate on the causal impact of ephemeral sharing in the context of online dating, with a large-scale randomized field experiment that avoids potential reporting biases and identification concerns. Results from this study demonstrate that ephemeral sharing can facilitate the formation of initial connections in a privacy-sensitive setting, such that they are willing to disclose more personal information when they take the initiative to match in the online dating platforms. The sender’s sharing of personal photos leads to follow-up conversational engagement from the receivers, thus effectively addressing the communication cold-start problems in privacy-sensitive settings. Our research also provides actionable implications for the platforms design privacy-preserving features. Online dating platforms or other private-sensitive settings can implement the ephemeral sharing design to encourage users on those platforms self-disclose more with their privacy being well-preserved, such that those platforms can tackle the communication cold-start problems. Besides, albeit the ephemeral sharing treatment targets motivating users to distribute personal photos in our study, it also affords the disclosure of personal information that formats in texts, audios, and videos. 2. Research Design Our randomized field experiment employs a user-level, between-subjects design. The experiment was implemented between February 28 and March 16 in 2020, ending up to 18 days. Each user on the partner platform was randomly assigned to either the treatment group or the control group when the user updated the mobile application to Version 3.8.2; the user stayed in the same group throughout the experiment (i.e., they either always upload persistent photos or always upload ephemeral photos). To avoid potential contamination, we made sure that no other experiments were running on the partner platform during the experimentation. Our experimental stimuli involve the user interface (UI) variations in the matching request page. Figure 1 and Figure 2 blueprint the manipulation information shown to a subject when landing on a request page and when uploading a photo in the matching request, respectively. First, as shown in Figure 1, the connect request UI for the control group invites the subjects to voluntarily upload a persona photo by stating ‘Upload a personal photo’; instead, the UI for the treatment group includes an option to ‘Upload a personal photo (ephemeral).’ Second, if the user taps the button to add a photo, a floating photo-uploading window pops up with more nuanced differences, as illustrated in Figure 2. First, the treatment UI entitles ‘Upload an ephemeral photo’ (as opposed to ‘Upload a photo’ in the control UI). Second, the treatment UI for uploading photos is a variant of the control image, with “burning fire” adjacent to the “photo” in the image (noting that the phrase “ephemeral” means ‘burn after viewing’ in the Chinese culture). The treatment description has an additional sentence explaining how the ephemeral photo functions. Our extensive interviews and pilot tests with users of the partner platform suggest that the meaning of ‘ephemeral photo’ is delivered appropriately.
Figure 1. Screenshot of the Request Page Notes: Figure 1 presents the screenshots of the request page with manipulation information (translated) highlighted in red. The left image is the treatment UI for the matching request page, and the right image is the control UI for the corresponding page. Figure 2. Screenshot of the Popup on the Request Page Notes: Figure 2 presents the screenshots popup window after a user taps to upload a photo, with manipulation information (translated) highlighted in red. The treatment UI situates at the left while the control UI on the right. 3. Results 3.1 Randomization Checks Before conducting further analyses, we perform randomization checks across the two groups on observed covariates. More specifically, we conduct pairwise t-tests on subjects’ gender, age, education, popularity, tenure, the date since subjects participate in the experiment and
Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests on categorical variables including users’ location (province-level), school, and major. There are no significant differences across the groups on any of the observed covariates, such that our experiment was implemented appropriately. 3.2 Main Analyses To examine whether the ephemeral treatment can result in expected effects, we conduct main analyses at the user level. The variables of interest are: i) the number of requests with a photo attached (# Photos), a variable that describes user information sharing behavior, in particular, ii) the number of initial matches (# Initial Matches), a variable denoting the match outcome, iii) The total number of messages that a sender receives from the new connections during the experiment, a variable observing further conversations from the receivers (# Total Receiver Messages). Since its distribution is highly skewed, we run the regressions with the logarithm as the dependent variable, i.e., Ln (# Total Receiver Messages). We also include user popularity and demographics as control variables (gender, age, education, and tenure). Table 1 reports the results of OLS regressions for the three variables of interest. First, Model 1 demonstrates that the coefficients of Ephemeral on # Photos are significant, positive (βEphemeral = 0.111, p < 0.01). The magnitude of the effect is approximately 52.1%. That is, considering that the average number of photos shared in the control group is 0.215, an increase of 0.111 takes up a share of 52.1% in information sharing, which is a significant improvement. Second, Model 2 indicates that subjects in the treatment group (versus subjects in the control group) significantly achieve more initial matches (βEphemeral = 0.079, p < 0.01). The size of the effect is 0.079, approximately a 3% increase in the average initial matches. Accordingly, we conclude that the ephemeral treatment significantly improves the match outcome. Model 3 suggests that the subjects in the treatment group (versus subjects in the control group) do significantly receive more messages from the matches they initiate to establish during the experiment (βEphemeral = 0.042, p
to perform user-level mediation analyses (Hayes 2017). Figure 3 presents the results of our mediation analysis. First, the analysis unravels that ephemeral treatment imposes a significant influence on the number of initial matches through user’s sharing more photos. Specifically, the direct effect of ephemeral treatment on the number of initial matches is not significant (Ephemeral → # Initial Matches), with zero included in the 95% confidence interval (CI) (95% CI∈ [-0.049, 0.113]). Second and more importantly, the 95% CI of the indirect effect, Ephemeral → # Photos → # Initial Matches, is significant (95% CI ∈ [0.041, 0.078]). Besides, the effect of Ephemeral on # Total Receiver Messages is significantly mediated by # Photo through two paths. The first path (Ephemeral → # Photos → # Initial matches → ln # Total Receiver Messages) has a 95% CI that does not include zero (95% CI ∈ [0.011, 0.021]), which suggests that the ephemeral treatment sequentially increase the number of matching requests with photos, initial matches, and total receiver messages. More importantly, the 95% CI of the second path (Ephemeral → # Photos → ln # Total Receiver Messages) does not include zero (95% CI ∈ [0.0001, 0.004]), suggesting that more personal photo sharing can directly make the receivers more engaged in conversation after successfully matched. To sum it up, our mediation analysis suggests the information-sharing behavior fully mediates the effect of the ephemeral treatment on the number of initial matches and the number of receiver messages. In other words, the mechanism of sharing more personal information completely explains the process by which the ephemeral treatment affects the match outcomes. Figure 3. Sequential Mediation Analysis 4. Discussions Our research address a common issue in privacy-sensitive settings, the communication cold-start problems, as users in online dating platforms typically refrain from sharing their personal information during the initial interaction phase, making it difficult for the two users who are still strangers to build up trust. The ephemeral sharing feature we design prompts the sharing of personal photos along with their matching requests, the effect of which provokes more initial matches and further increases the conversational engagement from the receivers, effectively addressing the communication cold-start problems in online dating platforms. As digital platforms grow, user privacy and data protection are increasingly important (Aridor et al. 2020). Since users demand privacy and seek to engage anonymously when possible, they become more and more cautious about their disclosure of personal information, which leads to distrust (John et al. 2016). It is our hope that our design is one of the many upcoming efforts in designing and implementing large-scale digital experiments to test effective privacy-preserving mechanisms. References Upon Request
You can also read