Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...

Page created by Jeremy Logan
 
CONTINUE READING
Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...
9/24/2021

Nutrition and Hydration
         F 692

   Re-Ignite Your Spark

                                 1
Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...
9/24/2021

          Re-Ignite Your Spark

F 692 Current Regulatory Trends
Data collected by LICA-MedMan and KHCA
 (September 2021):
Region VII CMS Survey Region (Iowa, Kansas,
 Missouri and Nebraska)

F 692 is not in the top 10 frequently cited
  deficiencies
F 692 is in the top 10 frequently cited
  deficiencies resulting in a G Level deficiency
  (#6) with 19 Citations and (#15) resulting in
  an IJ with 2 Citations

                                                          2
Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...
9/24/2021

Intent of Regulation
   The intent of this requirement is that the resident
    maintains, to the extent possible, acceptable
    parameters of nutritional and hydration status
    and that the facility:
    ◦ Provides nutritional and hydration care and services
      to each resident, consistent with the resident’s
      comprehensive assessment;
    ◦ Recognizes, evaluates, and addresses the needs of
      every resident, including but not limited to, the
      resident at risk or already experiencing impaired
      nutrition and hydration; and
    ◦ Provides a therapeutic diet that takes into account
      the resident’s clinical condition, and preferences, when
      there is a nutritional indication.

Definitions
   “Acceptable parameters of nutritional
    status” refers to factors that reflect that
    an individual’s nutritional status is
    adequate, relative to his/her overall
    condition and prognosis, such as weight,
    food/fluid intake and pertinent laboratory
    values.

                                                                        3
Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...
9/24/2021

Definitions
 “Artificial nutrition and hydration” are
  medical treatments and refer to nutrition
  that is provided through routes other
  than the usual oral route, typically by
  placing a tube directly into the stomach,
  the intestine or a vein.
 “Tube feeding” refers to the delivery of
  nutrients through a feeding tube directly
  into the stomach, duodenum, or jejunum.
  It is also referred to as an enteral feeding.

Definitions
   “Clinically significant” refers to the effects,
    results, or consequences that materially
    affect or are likely to affect an individual’s
    physical, mental, or psychosocial well-
    being either positively by preventing,
    stabilizing, or improving a condition or
    reducing a risk, or negatively by
    exacerbating, causing, or contributing to a
    symptom, illness, or decline in status.

                                                             4
Nutrition and Hydration - F 692 - Re-Ignite Your Spark 9/24/2021 - Kansas ...
9/24/2021

Definitions
   “Dietary supplements” refers to herbal and
    alternative products that are not regulated
    by the FDA and their composition is not
    standardized. Dietary supplements must be
    labeled as such and must not be represented
    for use as a conventional food or as the sole
    item of a meal or the diet.
   “Nutritional supplements” refers to
    products that are used to complement a
    resident’s dietary needs (calorie or nutrient
    dense drinks, TPN, enteral products and
    meal replacement products).

Definitions
   “Therapeutic diet” refers to a diet
    ordered by a physician or other delegated
    provider that is part of the treatment for
    a disease or clinical condition, to
    eliminate, decrease, or increase certain
    substances in the diet (sodium or
    potassium), or to provide mechanically
    altered food when indicated.

                                                           5
9/24/2021

        Certified Dietary Manager
                  F 801
   Educational Requirements
    ◦ Graduation from an AFNP-approved dietary
      training program
    ◦ Associate’s or Bachelor’s degree in Foodservice
      Management or Nutrition, culinary arts or hotel-
      restaurant management
    ◦ 2 years of institutional foodservice management
      and complete an approved 90 hour foodservice
      course
    ◦ Current or former member of the U.S. military
      with the pay grade of at least E-5 and have
      graduated from an approved military dietary
      manager training program

             Registered Dietitian
              (R.D. or R.D.N.)
 Minimum of a Bachelor’s Degree
  accredited by the ACEND
 1,200 hours in a supervised internship
 CDR Exam
 By 2024, a graduate degree will be the
  minimum requirement to sit for the CDR
  exam

                                                                6
9/24/2021

                     Nutritionist
 The role of the dietitian is more regulated
  and the titles should not be used
  interchangeably.
 Anyone who completes a degree in
  nutrition can refer to themselves as a
  nutritionist.
 Significant difference is that the dietitian
  can help diagnose and treat illness
  (Medical Nutrition Therapy)

Guidance
 Important to maintain adequate nutritional status, to
  the extent possible, to ensure each resident is able to
  maintain the highest practicable level of well-being.
 Early identification of residents with, or at risk for,
  impaired nutrition or hydration status may allow the
  IDT to develop and implement interventions to
  stablize or improve nutritional status before
  complications arise.
    ◦ Weight and lab results can be stabilized or improved, but
      not be correctable in some individuals
    ◦ Intake alone is not the only factor that can affect
      nutritional status
    ◦ Resident conditions and co-morbidities may prevent
      improved nutritional or hydration status, despite improved
      intake.

                                                                          7
9/24/2021

Guidance
   Factors influencing weight and nutritional
    status in aging:
    ◦ Body may not absorb or use nutrients
      effectively
    ◦ Changes in the ability to taste
    ◦ Decreased sensation for thirst or hunger
    ◦ Medical condition(s) affecting weight
      maintenance (muscle mass, cognitive status,
      end of life, disease processes, fluid retention)

Guidance
   Failure to identify residents at risk for
    compromised nutrition and hydration may
    be associated with an increased mortality
    and other negative outcomes
    ◦   Impairment of Wound Healing
    ◦   Functional Decline
    ◦   Fluid and Electrolyte Balance and Dehydration
    ◦   Unplanned Weight Change
    ◦   Urinary Tract Infections, Pneumonia,
        Confusion, Disorientation

                                                                8
9/24/2021

Guidance
   Weight loss, poor nutritional status or
    dehydration should be considered
    avoidable unless the facility can prove it
    has assessed/reassessed the resident’s
    needs, consistently implemented related
    care planned interventions, monitored for
    effectiveness and ensured coordination of
    care among the IDT.

Assessment
   A comprehensive nutritional assessment
    should be completed on any resident
    identified as being at risk for unplanned
    weight loss/gain and/or compromised
    nutritional status.
   The assessment may utilize existing
    information from sources, such as the RAI,
    assessments from other disciplines, the
    existing medical record, observation, direct
    care staff interviews and resident and family
    interviews.

                                                           9
9/24/2021

Assessment
   General Appearance
    ◦ Residents overall appearance (robust, think,
      obese, muscle wasting) and may include
      resident’s cognitive status, affect, oral health
      and dentition, ability to use the hands and
      arms and condition of hair, nails and skin
   Height
    ◦ A protocol for determining height helps to
      ensure that it will be measured as consistently
      as possible.

Assessment
   Weight
    ◦ Useful indicator when evaluated within the
      context of the individual’s personal history and
      overall condition. Weight goals should be based
      on a residents usual body weight or desired body
      weight.
    ◦ Procedure establishing a consistent method of
      weighing (using the same scale, wearing the same
      clothes, weight at the same time of day), verifying
      the resident’s weight upon admission, monitoring
      a resident’s weight over time to identify weight
      loss/gain, verifying weight measurements when
      changes occur and reassessment of interventions.

                                                                  10
9/24/2021

Assessment
   Standards of Practice
    ◦ Weight upon Admission or Readmission
    ◦ Weekly for the 1st Month
    ◦ Monthly Weight
      Identification of “Slow and Progressive Weight Loss”
    ◦ Weighing may also be pertinent if there is a
      significant change in condition, food intake has
      declined and persisted (more than one week)
      or evidence of altered nutritional status or
      fluid and electrolyte imbalance.

Assessment
   Weight Consideration
    ◦ Usual Body Weight, Medical Conditions, Diet and
      Supplement Orders, Changes in PO intake and
      Edema
   Parameters
    ◦ Differentiate Significant and Severe Loss
        5% or Greater than 5% in 30 Days
        7.5% or Greater than 7.5% in 90 Days
        10% or Greater than 10% in 180 Days
        Formula:
          % of Body Weight Loss = (usual weight-actual weight)/(usual
           weight) x 100

                                                                               11
9/24/2021

Assessment
   Interviews with Key Staff Members
    ◦ Direct Care Staff (PO Intake)
    ◦ Physicians and Non-Physician Practitioners
      (Relevant Diagnosis, Causes of Weight
      Changes)
    ◦ Qualified Dietitians (Nutritional Risk Factors
      and Nutritional Interventions)
    ◦ Pharmacists (Medication Interactions)

Assessment
   Food and Fluid Intake
    ◦ Estimated Calorie, Nutrient and Fluid Needs
    ◦ PO intake to meet those needs (including by
      mouth, enteral or parenteral)
    ◦ Meal and Snack patterns (time of supplement and
      medication consumption), special food
      formulation (ethnic and finger foods), dislikes and
      preferences, preferred portion sizes
    ◦ There is no reliable calculation to determine an
      individual’s fluid needs, an assessment should take
      into account those characteristics pertinent to
      the resident such as age, diagnoses and activity
      level.

                                                                  12
9/24/2021

Assessment
   Fluid Loss or Retention
    ◦ Can cause short term weight change
    ◦ Decreased appetite = Fluid/Electrolyte
      Imbalance
       Abrupt weight changes, changes in PO intake or
        altered level of consciousness
       Lab Tests (BUN, creatinine and Serum Osmolality)

Assessment
   Altered Nutrient Intake, Absorption and Utilization
    ◦ Congnitive or or functional decline
    ◦ Difficulty with chewing or swallowing food
    ◦ Inadequate amount of food or fluid, including insufficient tube
      feedings
    ◦ Lack of adequate assistance or supervision
    ◦ Adverse consequences related to medications
    ◦ Diseases and conditions (cancer, diabetes, heart or lung disease,
      infection and fever, liver disease, kidney disease, hyperthyroidism,
      mood disorders, GI disorders, wounds, repetitive movement
      disorders)
    ◦ Use of Diuretics may cause weight loss not associated with
      nutritional issues. This may result in planned weight loss but can
      also cause fluid and electrolyte imbalance/dehydration that
      causes a loss of appetite and weight if unmonitored.

                                                                                   13
9/24/2021

Assessment
   Laboratory/Diagnostic Evaluation
    ◦ Sometimes useful in identification of underlying
      causes of impaired nutrition, when the clinical
      assessment alone is not enough to define
      nutritional status.
    ◦ Although lab tests such as albumin and pre-
      albumin may help in some cases in deciding to
      initiate nutritional interventions, there is no
      evidence that they are useful for the serial follow-
      up of undernourished individuals (low albumin
      levels may be unrelated to nutrition, reflecting an
      acute illness).

Should Albumin and Prealbumin be
used as Indicators for Malnutrition?
   Question of the Month in 2017, published
    in the Journal of the Academy of
    Nutrition and Dietetics
    ◦ According to the Academy’s Evidence Analysis
      Library, serum proteins such as albumin and
      prealbumin are not included as defining
      characteristics of malnutrition because
      evidence analysis shows that serum levels of
      these proteins do not change in response to
      changes in nutrient intake.

                                                                   14
9/24/2021

Care Planning
   Information gathered from the nutritional assessment
    and dietary standards of practice are used to develop
    an individualized care plan to address the resident’s
    specific nutritional concerns and preferences.
    ◦ The care plan must address, identified causes of impaired
      nutritional status, resident’s personal goals and preferences
      and resident specific interventions, including a time frame
      and parameters for monitoring.
    ◦ The care plan should be updated as needed, when the
      resident’s condition changes, goals are met, interventions
      are determined to be ineffective or as new problems are
      identified.
    ◦ If goals are not achieved, interventions must be
      reevaluated for effectiveness and modified as appropriate.

Care Planning
 There should be a documented clinical basis for any
  conclusion that nutritional status or significant weight change
  are unlikely to stabilize or improve (physician documentation
  as to why the weight loss is medically unavoidable).
 The resident and/or resident’s representative’s involvement
  in the development of the care plan helps to ensure it is
  individualized and meets their personal goals and
  preferences.
 Decisions related to the possible provision of supplemental
  or artificial nutrition should be made in conjunction with the
  resident, the resident’s family and/or representative in
  accordance with state law, taking into account condition,
  prognosis and the resident’s known values and choices.

                                                                            15
9/24/2021

Interventions
   Diet Liberalization
    ◦ It could be beneficial to minimize restrictions,
      such as therapeutic or mechanically altered
      diets.
      It is the responsibility of the facility:
        Talk with the resident, their family and representative and
         provide information pertaining to the risks and benefits of a
         liberalized diet
        Work with the resident’s physician using the care planning
         process
        Accommodate the resident’s needs, preferences and goals.

Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
         Position Paper
   October 2010
    ◦ Position of the American Dietetic Association:
      Individualized Nutrition Approaches for Older
      Adults in Health Care Communities
   April 2018
    ◦ Position of the Academy of Nutrition and
      Dietetics: Individualized Nutrition
      Approaches for Older Adults: Long-Term
      Care, Post-Acute Care and Other Settings

                                                                               16
9/24/2021

Interventions
   Weight-Related Interventions
    ◦ Involve the resident and/or the resident
      representative to ensure the resident’s needs,
      preferences and goals are accomodated

Interventions
   Environmental Factors
    ◦ Appetite is often enhanced by the appealing
      aroma, flavor, form and appearance of food.
    ◦ Pleasant dining experience may improve
      intake
      Flexible dining environments, styles and schedules
      Providing meals that are palatable, attractive and
       nutritious (food temperatures and seasonings)
      Environment where residents eat is conducive to
       dining (dining room and/or resident’s room)

                                                                  17
9/24/2021

             The Dining Room
 “Meal Monitor Program” Implementation
 Customer Satisfaction System or Process
 Resident Council Involvement

Interventions
   Disease Processes
    ◦ A resident’s clinical condition may have a
      significant impact on the types of
      interventions considered. The facility is
      responsible for identifying relevant diagnosis
      and appropriate interventions to address
      specific needs, as applicable.

                                                             18
9/24/2021

Interventions
   Functional Factors
    ◦ Conditions that interfere with the ability to
      physically perform the task of eating or drinking
      adequately, such as the ability to use one’s hands,
      vision, chewing and swallowing capabilities or the
      ability to reposition one’s self at the table.
       Underlying causes should be assessed and identify
        interventions which may be most effective (dentures)
       Specialized dishes and utensils
       Eye glasses and Hearing aids
       Restorative eating programs
       Direct Assistance by Staff
       Food and Drinks are readily accessible and in close
        proximity to individuals with mobility impairments

Interventions
   Modification of food and fluid consistency
    may be an appropriate intervention,
    however it may unnecessarily decrease
    the quality of life and impair nutritional
    status by affecting appetite and reducing
    intake.

                                                                     19
9/24/2021

Interventions
   Medications
    ◦ Help to increase appetite, reduce acid reflux,
      reduce nausea
    ◦ Unintended effect of impairing a resident’s
      nutritional or hydration status, experiencing a
      lack of appetite, nausea, dry mouth or other
      unintended effects.
       A resident may require frequent sips of a drink
        during a meal if they experience a dry mouth.

Interventions
 Improving intake with wholesome foods is generally
  preferable to adding nutritional supplements.
 Supplements may be tried to increase calorie and
  nutrient intake
 Taking a nutritional supplement during medication
  administration may also increase caloric intake
  without reducing the resident’s appetite at mealtime.
    ◦ Fortification of Foods (added protein, fat and
      carbohydrates)
    ◦ Smaller more frequent meals
    ◦ Between meal snacks or nourishments
    ◦ Increasing portion sizes of favorite foods

                                                                20
9/24/2021

Food First Approach
   Fortified Foods – Items prepared in house
    that provide additional calories and/or
    protein and are not required to be ordered
    by the physician
   Snacks – Regular food items that are
    available and generally are not required to
    be ordered by the physician
   Commercially Prepared Supplements are
    discouraged at meal time. It is preferred to
    use items from the menu and fortify or
    enhance them to allow maximum meal time
    intake.

Real Food Options
   “Healthy versus Unhealthy”
    ◦ Ice Cream
       ½ cup = 220 calories and 3 g protein
    ◦ Chocolate Milk
       8 oz = 220 calories and 8 g protein
    ◦ Whole Milk
       8 oz = 150 calories and 8 g protein
    ◦ Peanut Butter
       2 Tbsp = 190 calories and 7 g protein
       1 Slice Wheat Bread = 110 Calories and 4 g protein
       1 Tbsp Grape Jelly = 50 calories
    ◦ Egg
       1 Large= 74 calories and 6 g protein
    ◦ Yogurt
       4 oz = 90 calories and 3 g protein
       8 oz = 180 calories and 6 g protein

                                                                   21
9/24/2021

Fortified Foods
   Enhanced in Calories and Protein
   Minimum of 180-190 Calories
   5-6 grams of Protein
   Examples
    ◦   Cheesy Eggs
    ◦   Fortified Milk
    ◦   Power Potatoes
    ◦   Power Pudding
    ◦   Super Cereal
    ◦   Fortified Juice, Hot Cocoa, Soup

               Supplement Formulary
   Example: Abbott Nutrition or Nestle

   2.0 Products
        Popular: Butter Pecan or Vanilla (32 oz)
        2 oz = 120 Calories, 5 g Protein
        Usage: Consumption, Supplement appropriate with Medication Pass and Lactose
        Intolerance

   Hormel Health Labs
    ◦ Mighty Shakes
           Chocolate, Strawberry or Vanilla (4 oz)
           200 Calories, 6 g Protein
           Usage: Malnutrition
           No Sugar Added Version = 4 oz (200 Calories, 8 g Protein)
    ◦ Magic Cups
           Popular: Orange or Berry Wild (4 oz)
           290 Calories, 9 g Protein
           Usage: Malnutrition, Texture Modified Diet Alternative (Frozen as Ice Cream or Thawed as
            Pudding)

                                                                                                             22
9/24/2021

                   Supplement Formulary
   High Protein Powder(s)
    ◦    1 Packet = 8 g Protein
    ◦    Usage: Powder Protein Supplement for Wound Healing, Malnutrition
   Boost Breeze
    ◦    Popular: Wild Berry, Orange, Peach and Variety Pack
    ◦    8 oz = 250 Calories, 9 g Protein
    ◦    Usage: Lactose Free and Gluten Free Supplement Option
   Prostat
    ◦    SF Vanilla, SF Wild Cherry Pouch
    ◦    30 ml = 60 Calories, 15 g Protein
    ◦    Usage: Liquid Protein Supplement that contains L-Tryptophan for Wound Healing, Malnutrition
   Prostat AWC
    ◦    SF Wild Cherry
    ◦    30 ml = 108 Calories, 17 g Protein
    ◦    Usage: Liquid Protein Supplement that contains L-Arginine, L-Cystine, Zinc and Vitamin C for Multiple Wounds, Stage 3 and 4 Pressure Ulcers
    ◦    *Short Term Use and Clinical Follow-Up for effectiveness recommended
   Arginaid
    ◦    Orange, Cherry
    ◦    1 Packet = 25 Calories, 0 g Protein
    ◦    Usage: Chronic and Advanced Wound Healing
    ◦    Supplement that contains L-Arginine, Vitamin C and Vitamin E
    ◦    *Short Term Use and Clinical Follow-Up for effectiveness recommended

                                  Re-Ignite Your Spark
                                      Taste Testing

                                                                                                                                                             23
9/24/2021

Interventions
   The evidence is limited about benefits
    from appetite stimulants. While their use
    may be appropriate in specific
    circumstances, they are not a substitute
    for appropriate investigation of modifiable
    risk factors and underlying causes of
    weight loss.

Interventions
   Maintaining Fluid and Electrolyte Balance
    ◦ Poor fluid intake, abnormal lab values,
      medications and resident conditions may
      affect a resident’s fluid/electrolyte balance
    ◦ Offering a variety of fluids during and
      between meals, assisting residents with
      drinking, keeping beverages available and
      within reach, and evaluating medications
      (causing dehydration)
    ◦ Alternate fluids, such as popsicles, gelatin and
      ice cream may be offered

                                                               24
9/24/2021

Interventions
 Feeding Tubes
 TPN

Monitoring
   On-going monitoring of care planned interventions is
    necessary.
    ◦ Interviewing the resident and/or resident representative to
      determine personal goals and preferences
    ◦ Direct observation
    ◦ Interviewing direct care staff to gain information about the
      resident, current interventions and what their responsibilities are
      for reporting on these interventions (and possible suggestions
      for changes)
    ◦ Reviewing the resident-specific factors and any supplemental
      nutrition (relevance, new concerns, new medications, new
      diagnosis)
    ◦ Evaluate to determine if current interventions are implemented
      and effective (reviewing weight records, meal monitors, intake
      and output logs, nurses notes, lab values and physician or
      dietitian assessments)

                                                                                  25
9/24/2021

Key Elements of NonCompliance
   To cite deficient practice at F 692, the surveyor’s investigation will
    generally show that the facility failed to do one or more of the
    following:
    ◦ Accurately and consistently assess a resident’s nutritional status on
      admission and as needed thereafter
    ◦ Identify a resident at nutritional risk and address risk factors for
      impaired nutritional status, to the extent possible
    ◦ Identify, implement, monitor and modify interventions (as appropriate),
      consistent with the resident’s assessed needs, choices, preferences, goals
      and current professional standards of practice, to maintain acceptable
      parameters of nutritional status
    ◦ Notify the physician as appropriate in evaluating and managing causes of
      the resident’s nutritional risks and impaired nutritional status
    ◦ Identify and apply relevant approaches to maintain acceptable
      parameters of resident’s nutritional status, including fluids
    ◦ Provide a therapeutic diet when ordered
    ◦ Offer sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health

Immediate Jeopardy
   Repeated, systemic failure to assess and address a resident’s
    nutritional status and to implement pertinent interventions based
    on such an assessment resulted in continued significant or severe
    weight loss and functional decline
   Repeated failure to assist a resident who required assistance with
    meals and drink resulted in or made likely the development of life-
    threatening symptom(s) or the development or continuation of
    severely impaired nutritional status
   Dietary restrictions or downgraded diet textures, such as
    mechanical soft or pureed textures, were provided by the facility
    against the resident’s expressed preferences and resulted in
    substantial and ongoing decline in food intake resulting in significant
    or severe unplanned weight loss with accompanying irreversible
    functional decline to the point where the resident was placed on
    Hospice
   The failure to provide an ordered potassium restricted therapeutic
    diet resulted in evidence of cardiac dysrythmias or other changes
    in medical condition due to hyperkalemia.

                                                                                         26
9/24/2021

Actual Harm
   Failure to revise an/or implement the care plan addressing the resident’s
    impaired ability to feed him/herself resulted in significant, not sever,
    unplanned weight change and impaired wound healing (not attributable to
    an underlying medical condition)
   Failure to identify a decrease in food intake, which resulted in a significant,
    unintended weight loss from declining food and fluids, which resulted in
    the resident becoming weakened and unable to participate in ADL’s
   Failure to assess the relative risks and benefits of restricting or
    downgrading diet and food consistency or to accommodate a resident’s
    choice to accept the related risk resulted in declining food/fluid intake and
    significant weight loss
   Failure to accommodate documented resident food dislikes and
    preferences resulted in poor food/fluid intake and a decline in function
   Failure to provide a gluten-free diet (one free of wheat, barley and rye
    products) as ordered for a resident with known celiac disease resulted in
    the resident developing GI symptoms, including significant, not severe,
    weight loss, chronic diarrhea and occasional vomiting.

No Actual Harm with Potential for
More Than Minimal Harm
 Failure to obtain accurate weight(s) and to verify
  weight(s) as needed
 The facility’s intermittent failure to provide required
  assistance with eating resulted in poor intake,
  however, the resident met identified weight goals
 Failure to provide additional nourishment when
  ordered for a resident, however, the resident did not
  experience significant or severe weight loss
 Failure to provide a prescribed sodium-restricted
  therapeutic diet (unless declined by the resident or
  the resident’s representative or not followed by the
  resident); however, the resident did not experience
  medical complications such as heart failure related to
  sodium excess

                                                                                            27
9/24/2021

No Actual Harm with Potential for
Minimal Harm
   Failure of the facility to provide
    appropriate care and services to maintain
    acceptable parameters of nutritional
    status, which includes hydration, and
    minimize negative outcomes places
    residents at risk for more than minimal
    harm.

                 Questions
                 Thank You!

                                                      28
You can also read