NEXT GENERATION ROTAVIRUS VACCINES - WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee 26-27 June 2018
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
NEXT GENERATION ROTAVIRUS VACCINES WHO Product Development for Vaccines Advisory Committee 26-27 June 2018 Duncan Steele, Carl Kirkwood, Lyou-Fu Ma Confidential and proprietary data © 2014 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
CURRENT SCENARIO FOR ROTAVIRUS VACCINES Robust pipeline of live, attenuated oral rotavirus vaccines • WHO pre-qualified and globally introduced • Nationally licensed and in use in country • New vaccines in development Global impact of rotavirus vaccines • Global status of rotavirus vaccine introductions • Global impact and vaccine effectiveness Rationale for developing parenterally delivered, non-replicating rotavirus vaccines • Modest efficacy and effectiveness of the current live, attenuated rotavirus vaccines => better efficacy • Potential increased safety profile of non-replicating rotavirus vaccines • Opportunity for combination vaccines with routine childhood vaccines • Potential lower COGS • Potential for alternative immunization schedules CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 2
Dormant WHO PQ National LIVE ATTENUATED, ORAL ROTAVIRUS VACCINES license Discovery & Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Market preclinical Vaccine pipeline is diverse including: Rotarix • Multiple live-attenuated oral vaccines GSK Live-attenuated oral (WHO PQ) • Non-replicating candidates RotaTeq Merck “Current” licensed generation vaccines: ROTAVAC • Three WHO PQed products Bharat Biotech • National licenses, mainly in private market Liquid BRV RotaSIIL Liquid BRV • These aim to match performance of Shantha Biotechnics Serum Institute Serum Institute Rotarix/RotaTeq vaccines Liquid BRV Rotavin • Offer domestic mfg. options, add to BUTANTAN Brazil Polyvac, Vietnam. supplier base / sustain competition Lamb rotavirus Live-attenuated, oral Liquid presentation Lanzhou Institute of Bharat Biotech Biological Products Next generation parenteral vaccines Liquid BRV • Aim to exceed / meet performance of WUHAN China Rotarix/RotaTeq vaccines RV3-BB • Offer potential additional safety DCVMs include: Biofarma, Indonesia Bharat Serum • Offer potential lower costs BioFarma Hilleman Heat stable pentavalent • Offer potential combination Polyvac Wuhan Hilleman MSD, India opportunities for increased coverage Shantha Butantan Langzhou © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 3
GLOBAL ROTAVIRUS VACCINE INTRODUCTIONS 92 countries have introduced by December 2017 New Gavi country introductions 2017: Lesotho, Cote D’Ivoire, Pakistan (phased national introduction ongoing) 2018: Afghanistan, Uganda, DRC, Nepal, Benin, Bangladesh (Uttar Pradesh will also introduce) 2019 (expected): Nigeria*, CAR, Myanmar, Lao PDR Source: International Vaccine Access Center (IVAC), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. VIEW-hub Global Vaccine Introduction and Implementation Report, June20, 2018 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 4
ROTAVIRUS VACCINE EFFICACY (PRE-LICENSURE) WAS SIMILAR IN SIMILAR SETTINGS (i.e. HIGH AND LOW INCOME COUNTRIES) Efficacy against severe rotavirus disease in first year of life US/Finland/Other India RotaTeq 98% (88.3,100) RotaSIIL 36% (11.7, 53.6) India ROTAVAC 56.3% (12.8, 73.3) Niger PK Kulkarni George Armah Samba Sow RotaSIIL 66.7% (49.9, 77.9) Southeast Asia Nita Bhandari RotaTeq 51.0% (12.8, 73.3) Latin America/Finland Rotarix 84.7% (71.7,92.4) Southeast Asia (high) Rotarix > 96% Africa Shabir Madhi Nigel Cunliffe RotaTeq 64.2% (40.2, 79.4) Rotarix 61.7 % (44.0, 73.2) Dang Duc Anh K Zaman Sheila Isanaka Vesikari T, Matson DO, Dennehy P et al. NEJM 2006; 354:23-33; Ruiz-Palacios GM, Perez-Schael I, et al. NEJM 2006; 354:11-22; Madhi SA, Cunliffe NA, Steele AD et al. NEJM 2010; 362:346- 357; Zaman K, Anh DD, Victor CV et al. Lancet 2010; 376:615-23; Armah GE, Sow S, Breiman RF et al. Lancet 2010; 376:606-614; Bhandari N, Rongsen-Chandola T, Bavdekar A, et al. Lancet 2014; 383:2136-43; Isanaka S, Ousmane G, Langendorf C, et al. NEJM 2017;376:1121-30; Kulkarni PS, Desai S, Tewari T, et al. Vaccine 2017; 35:6228-37 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 5
ROTAVIRUS DISEASE BURDEN AFTER ROTAVIRUS VACCINE INTRODUCTION Attributable proportion of rotavirus severe diarrhea is still high, despite vaccine introduction and uptake in African countries (provisional unpublished data) Kenya (RVIDA, 1st year data) Tanzania Source: Karen Kotloff, UMD and Eric Houpt and colleagues, UVA CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 7
WHAT HAVE WE LEARNT ABOUT LIVE, ORAL ROTAVIRUS VACCINES? • Despite enormous success of live attenuated, oral rotavirus vaccines several issues remain: o A lower protective efficacy in the first 1-2 years of life (~50-60%) in developing countries in Asia and Africa against moderate-to-severe rotavirus diarrhea o Waning efficacy in the second year of life with little evidence of protection in the second year as compared to the protection in "high-income“ countries (>95%) o Limited indirect protection in impoverished, high risk settings • Lower national coverage of rotavirus vaccine than DPT-3 / pentavalent vaccine rates in most countries • Vaccine costs are still relatively high. • Despite an overall acceptable safety profile, intussusception rate seems to be slightly increased by the live oral rotavirus vaccination (occurrence 1 to 3 /100 000 vaccine recipients) in developed countries Thus non-replicating, parenterally delivered rotavirus vaccines may provide viable alternative CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 8
CHALLENGES FOR ORAL ROTAVIRUS VACCINES Multiple clinical immuno studies • 2 v 3 doses of Rotatrix • With/without breastfeeding Factors that lower Factors that affect • Interference from maternal ab virus titre antibody responses • Interval between doses • Booster dose at 9 mo • Transplacental maternal • Nutritional status • Enteric pathogen interference antibodies • Environmental enteropathy • Zn / probiotic co-administration • Breast milk antibodies • Microbiota • Stomach acid/proteases • Micronutrient deficiency Multiple host studies • Co-administration of other • Early & constant exposure • Microbiome vaccines to other gut pathogens • Blood group antigen /Lewis • Other co-morbidities secretor status • Environmental enteropathy Glass RI, Jiang B, Parashar U. Vaccine 2018; 36:2233-36; Patel M, Shane AL, Parashar U et al, J Infect Dis 2009; 200:39-48 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 9
NON-REPLICATING, PARENTERAL ROTAVIRUS VACCINES Pre- Discovery Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Licensure clinical NRRV (P2-VP8*) PATH Inactivated Rotavirus CDC/SII Non replicating Expressed VP6 protein VLP Potential benefits include: VP2/6; VP2/6/7 • Lower COGs • Higher efficacy profile Combo- VP6 with • Decreased signal of intussusception norovirus VLP • Potential for use in combination vaccine • Potential for alternative dosing schedules CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 10
NON-REPLICATING ROTAVIRUS VACCINE (NRRV – P2-VP8* TV) VP4 hemagglutinin • Developed by PATH, using NIH constructs. * VP7 outer capsid • SK Vaccines, Korea - commercial partner * • Trivalent vaccine candidate based on: • truncated VP8 subunits of P[4], P[6] and P[8] genotypes (major circulating human rotavirus genotypes) • fused to tetanus toxin P2 CD4 epitope VP6 inner capsid • expressed in E.coli (T7 promoter) Hsc70 binding site • adsorbed to aluminum hydroxide • parenteral IM administration route Fusion domain ΔVP8* * * Wen X et al. Vaccine 2014; Wen X et al. HVI 2015 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 11
CLINICAL DEVELOPMENT OF P2-VP8* MONOVALENT CANDIDATE Phase 1 safety study in US adults Phase 2 age-descending, dose-escalating study of the monovalent vaccine candidate (P2-VP8* P[8]) in toddlers and infants in South Africa Monovalent P2-VP8* P[8] was well tolerated and immunogenic Serum antibody geometric mean titres (unadjusted) • 4-fold rises of both IgA and IgG responses observed • Increasing GMTs with dose and titres • Homologous N-Abs observed in ~50% of subjects • Responses to P[4] and P[6] had lower GMTs Fix A, Harro C, McNeal M et al. Vaccine 2015; 33:3766-72; Groome MJ, Koen A, Fix A et al, Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17:843-53 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 12
Serum antibody responses PHASE 2 SAFETY/IMMUNOGENICITY IN TODDLERS AND INFANTS Shedding of Rotarix after 3-dose P2-VP8* vaccine Groome MJ, Koen A, Fix A et al, Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17:843-53 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 13
AGE-DESCENDING, DOSE-ESCALATING STUDY OF THE TRIVALENT P2- VP8* VACCINE IN SOUTH AFRICAN INFANTS • Phase 1/2 study in South Africa – initiated in March 2016 • Healthy adults, toddlers and infants • Dose-escalation: 15 => 30 => 90 µg of total antigen • Infants received 3 IM doses, one month apart, co-administered with EPI vaccines • Enrolled in two stages, DSMB review before progression to Phase 2 • Enrollment closed in May 2017 – 558 infants enrolled • Final visit for primary data (28 days after last study vaccination) – 18 August 2017 • All dose-levels in infants well tolerated and no safety signals observed • Immunogenicity results showed robust immune responses (n=139/arm) A priori “go” criteria were met and a decision to progress to Phase 2b/3 efficacy study, with early futility read. CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 14
TWO DATA SLIDES WITHHELD OF THE P2-VP8* TRIVALENT CLINICAL TRIAL IN SOUTH AFRICA CONFIDENTIAL Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 15
INACTIVATED ROTAVIRUS VACCINE (IRV) WITH GROWTH AND STABILITY >99% TLP G1P8 G2P4 ~ 107 ffu/ml ~ 108 ffu/ml G1P4 CDC-9 strain ● 107 ~ 108 titer in Vero cells ● Predominant (>90%) triple-layered ● Stable during USP & DSP Jiang B et al, Vaccine 2008; Jiang B et al, HVI 2008 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 16
IRV-CDC9 SHOWS IMMUNOGENICITY AND PROTECTION IN ANIMAL MODELS Induces cross-neutralizing-antibody to homotypic IM route protects against oral challenge in and heterotypic strains 10000 gnotobiotic piglets pre dose 1 post dose 1 post dose 2 post dose 3 1000 Placebo IRV- CDC9 Antibodies (GMT) 100 10 Wa G1P[8] MW333 G8P[4] WI61 G9P[8] Days of rotavirus shedding in stool after oral challenge (measured by EIA) Jiang B, Wang Y, Glass RI. Human Vac & Immunotherap 2013; 9:1634-37; Wang Y, Azevedo M, Saif LJ et al Vaccine 2010; 28:5432-36 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 17 Wang Y, Vlasova A, Velasquez DE et al. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0166038
ONE DATA SLIDE OF UNPUBLISHED RESULTS OF CO- ADMINISTRATION OF IRV-CDC9 AND IPV IN RAT MODEL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 18
IRV-CDC9 DEVELOPMENT: PROGRESS TO DATE AT SERUM INSTITUTE Procurement of strains and related regulatory work completed. Preparation and characterization of seed viruses completed. Production procedure (pilot scale) standardized. Inactivation kinetic study on pilot scale (one liter) completed. Immunogenicity & cross protective immunity in animals established. Assays validated, stability (up to 9 months) and potency completed. Future plans • Large scale production development process optimization (one year). • Animal Toxicity materials preparation (six months). • First in human study should start by Mid 2019 • Combination vaccine R&D – proposed with IPV CONFIDENTIAL Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 19
APPROXIMATE DEVELOPMENT TIMELINES FOR LEAD CANDIDATES 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 cGMP Multinational P2b/3 Futility/Efficacy Trial with active comparator for PATH/SK Chemicals Local Registration WHO PQ Stand Alone Manuf P3 prevention of severe RV gastroenteritis in healthy infants Trivalent P2-VP8 MFDS Vaccine Value Proposition / Health Economics of various options Formulation Combination Combination Vaccine Vaccine Formulation cGMP Manuf Clinical immunogenicity Feasibility bridging trial NRRV+ Penta/Hexa Scale up Immunization Schedule Clinical immunogenicity Trial- Prime (oral RV vax) / Boost (trivalent P2-VP8) Ph2: Immunogenicity Age GLP Tox Adult Phase 1 Ph3 clinical efficacy Traditional path Descending IRV CDC9 CDC/SIIL IND Local Registration MFDS cGMP Proc Validation/CGMP Manuf P3 Manuf Ph1 Ph2/3 Age De-escalation to Ph3 booster extension study for efficacy booster population Licensure as a toddler booster dose in ORV countries Proc Validation/cGMP Local Registration Manuf for Ph3 TBD Last updated: July 19, 2018 © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 20
HIGH-LEVEL VALUE PROPOSITION OF NEXT GENERATION ROTAVIRUS VACCINES Strategic goal: To develop a parenterally administered alternative to currently available live attenuated oral rotavirus vaccines (LORVs) which is safe, provides increased relative efficacy and is more affordable to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with severe rotavirus gastroenteritis (SRVGE) in infants and toddlers residing in low resource settings THAT WILL Increase relative vaccine efficacy over existing LORVs (new benefits Provide a parenteral route of administration to circumvent the purported mechanisms resulting in over existing suboptimal efficacy of LORVs in infants and toddlers in low resource settings alternative) Supply for public sector purchase at a lower price per dose and per regimen rotavirus vaccine than currently available LORVs Has the potential to be co-formulated with other parenterally delivered pediatric combination vaccines to further reduce cost-of-goods sold (COGS), costs of vaccine delivery, and burden on the cold chain. BECAUSE Immunization engenders antibody response that exerts protective effect at the gut level (Reasons to Combining with EPI vaccines facilitates delivery and reduces associated costs invest in product) Enhanced efficacy and ease of administration, small footprint in cold chain, reduced vaccine wastage Efficient, high throughput, low cost manufacturing platform. Greatly reduced supply constraints Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 21
Gavi prices: Rotarix – $4.38/course TARGET PRODUCT PROFILES - NEW ROTAVIRUS VACCINES RotaTeq - $9.60/course RotaVac BRV-PV Lyo RV3-BB P2-VP8*-TV IRV Characteristic (Bharat Biotech) (Serum Institute) (PT Biofarma) (PATH / SK Vaccines) (CDC / Serum Institute) Indication Prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis Target Population Infants Infants Infants and Neonates Infants Infants Route of Administration Oral Oral Oral IM IM 1 dose vial TBD 1 or 2 dose vial 1 dose vial Presentation / Formulation 5 dose vials (0.5mL/d) Combo product with Combo product with (2mL liquid) (2mL liquid) penta or hexa IPV 3 doses 3 doses 3 doses 3 doses Dosing Schedule (6, 10, 14wk DTP (6, 10, 14wk DTP (6, 10, 14wk DTP 3 doses (6,10,14wk or 2,4,6mo) schedule) schedule) schedule) (6, 10, 14wk DTP) Duration of Protection 2 years 2 years 2 years 2 years 2 years Vaccination Strategy Routine Routine Routine Routine + Penta Routine + IPV Expected Efficacy 56% 36% - 67% 56 - 73% 75% (TBD) 75% (TBD) Price per Dose $0.98 $1.70 (TBD) $1.17 (TBD) $0.85 (TBD) TBD Licensure Date Q2 2014 Q4 2016 2020 2022 (TBD) 2024+ (TBD) WHO PQ Date Q1 2018 Q4 2018 2022 2024 (TBD) 2025+ (TBD) CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 22
NEXT GENERATION INTERVENTION TARGET PRODUCT PROFILE Variable Minimum Optimistic Indication* Prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants and toddlers Prevention of severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants and toddlers Target Population* Individuals ~6 weeks to 2 years of age during primary EPI series (co- Neonates through children 2 years of age during primary EPI series (co- administration) administration) Target Countries GAVI-eligible and Lower-Middle Income Countries GAVI-eligible and Lower-Middle Income Countries Efficacy* >75% >75% Duration of Protection Through 2nd year of life Through 2nd year of life Onset of Immunity 2 weeks after 3rd dose 2 weeks after 2nd dose Indirect (Herd) Protection Yes Yes Safety Clinically acceptable safety profile Clinically acceptable safety profile Co-administration EPI series EPI series Presentation Liquid formulated with Alum Liquid formulated with Alum Vaccine in presentations from one to five 0.5-ml doses filled in a “2R” vial Vaccine in presentations from one to five 0.5-ml doses filled in a “2R” vial conforming to ISO 8362 dimensions. Vial height 3.5 cm conforming to ISO 8362 dimensions. Vial height 3.1 cm or less, for reasons of volume reduction and dimensional harmonization. Route of Administration and Intramuscular Intramuscular dosing frequency 3 doses at 3-8 week intervals, starting at 6 weeks of age 2 doses at 3-8 week intervals, starting at birth Vaccine Volume (cm3 /dose) 0.5ml/dose 0.5 ml /dose 17cm3 17cm3 Stability / Shelf Life 2 years at 2-8C ;VVM-30 (30 days @40C, >3 years at 2-8C) VVM-30 (30 days @40C, >3 years at 2-8C) Product Registration Path Marketing Authorization Application from NRA designated as functional by Marketing Authorization Application from NRA designated as functional by WHO - Local license/WHO PQ WHO - Local license/WHO PQ WHO Prequalification Date 2023 2022 Primary Target Delivery Channel GAVI and Lower-Middle Income Countries GAVI and Lower-Middle Income Countries Clinical Endpoint for Licensure Efficacy Efficacy © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 23
COMBINATION OPTIONS – PREFERENCE UNDER DIFFERENT CONDITIONS (A GATES FOUNDATION PERSPECTIVE) Conditions where this combination would be preferred 1 Heptavalent vaccine • Formulation for Heptavalent is feasible AND (Penta+IPV+NexGenRV) • Price for Hepta is less than or equal to Hexa 1 plus NextGenRV • Formulation for Hepta is not feasible 2 Removal of IPV shot in combination with Penta makes space for Hexavalent-1 (Penta+IPV) & NextGenRV NextGenRV injection in the schedule, if efficacy can support replacement of ORV • Hexa1 exists but countries prefer to unbundle because Hexa1 price 3 is > Penta + 2 doses of IPV Hexavalent-2 • OR Hexa1 supply insufficient to cover demand in the 2023-2027 (Penta+NextGenRV) & IPV AND Hexa2 is ready in that time period • OR After 2031, countries no longer want IPV 4 • Formulation and price are prohibitive in the options above NextGenRV+IPV Combo & • 2 doses of NextGenRV provides sufficient protection Pentavalent • OR an oral neonatal dose oral provides sufficient protection in conjunction with the NextGenRV+IPV combo Last updated: July 19, 2018 CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 24
DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS Clinical development • Choice of comparator for Phase 3 efficacy studies – no correlate of protection identified • Innovative immunization schedules and strategies – prime boost options Manufacturing and formulation development • Selection of manufacturing partner (requires a compelling business case) • Stand-alone or combination vaccine strategies • RV + pentavalent vaccine or hexavalent vaccine • RV + IPV Policy and introduction • Policy and regulatory pathways need to be examined and developed • PPC and gPPP required Full Public Health Value Proposition CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 25
THANK YOU Last updated: July 19, 2018
SUBUNIT ROTAVIRUS VACCINE (VP6 INNER CAPSID PROTEIN) Vaccine Developer(s) Development Expressed Cincinnati Children’s VP6 expressed in E. coli as a fusion protein with maltose binding protein, and rotavirus proteins Hospital Med Cent, USA administered with attenuated heat-labile toxin LT (adjuvant). (based on rotavirus VP6 inner Animal studies: capsid) • Immunogenic (via CD4+ T cells) • Protected in challenge studies in mice Vaccine research Rotavirus VP6 - self-assemble into oligomeric structures (nanotubes, tubular center/University of and spherical structures) or produced using a Baculovirus expression system Tampere Finland Animal studies: • Immunogenic, induce strong humoral and T cell immunity generated CD4+ CTLs with the potential to lyse RV-infected target cells. • Protective in small animal studies (predom. Homotypic) Combined RV - norovirus vaccine candidate: Murine challenge: • showed protection against RV shedding observed regardless of delivery route (intramuscularly, intranasally or a combination) CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 27
SUBUNIT ROTAVIRUS VACCINE (VLP) Vaccine Developer(s) Development Virus like Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma Rotavirus VP2, VP6, VP7 and NSP4 (from G1P[8] strains) particle Co-op., Japan. Plant based production: VLPs are produced by transient expression in Nicotiana approach benthamiana plants using Agrobacterium vectors transfected with the rotavirus genes Animal studies: • induced the significant high level of anti-Wa IgG in dose dependent. • homologous neutralizing antibodies was statistically higher than the placebo group Baylor College of Medicine, Various Constructs: VP2/VP4/VP6/VP7 VLP produced in baculovirus expression USA system. Animal studies - murine • Highly Immunogenic • Various delivery routes compared IM, IN and oral. • Parenterally or intranasally gave highest mean protection from challenge • Protective small animals (predominantly homotypic) CONFIDENTIAL © Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 28
You can also read