NET ZERO BASIN Pilot field development - SPE London
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Pilot field summary West 21/27a-6 East ● Fully appraised, seven reservoir penetrations, 5 Reserves Summary three tested wells, core and fluid samples held by Orcadian, two high quality 3D seismic Pilot and Pilot South 21/27a-6 Volumetric calculations have been undertaken for the Pilot discovery. A most likely STOIIP for Pilot and Pilot South combined of 263 MMstb was estimated, uncertainty assessments suggested a range of +/-8%. This is a relatively narrow range, and survey reflects the fact the discovery is well appraised and seismic imaging is of high quality. A hydrocarbon pore thickness map was created as part of the volumetric calculations, see Fig. 5.1. ● Very high quality sandstone turbidite reservoir, 50 mSec TWT 34% porosity, 2 to 10 darcies of permeabilit HCPV Data provided courtesy of WesternGeco ● Significant oil in place: 263 MMbbls; audited 2P 500m reserve of 79 MMbbls, based on a low salinity polymer flood of the reservoi ● Variable quality oil from 12º to 17º API, 160 cP to 1,200 c ● Shallow water (c. 80m), 140 kms due East from Aberdeen, c. 40 kms from Gannet et al 2 s P r y
A project delivering on the Government’s Net Zero agenda ● Many opportunities to 35 reduce emissions identifie Scope 1 Scope 2 Benchmarks 30 ● Integration of aggressive process heat management Pilot field development 25 with high efficiency back- up power generation and Kg CO2/bbl 20 electrification has the Shorter field life and lower fluid potential to drive handling 15 30 emissions down by over 24.7 80 21 Heat pumps and 10 reciprocating gas FPP wind and wave ● Local wind farm power, 14.4 engines power unit with highly efficient back- 5 2.3 up gas engines, reduces 5.9 0.4 2.6 1.4 emissions as low as 0 Typical North Sea Pilot Polymer Process & Grid Single Two connection to a future grid viscous oil 2018 water ood ood power from wind wind with half of today’s CO2 average generation year 2 turbine turbines optimised intensity Estimates from recently submitted CSR Addendum prepared with Crondall Energy. These numbers are CO2e 4 fl % fl d
100000 150000 200000 250000 0 100000 150000 200000 250000 0 50000 50000 fi fl y Water Flood Polymer Flood J182638 DOI: 10.2118/182638-PA Date: 8-March-18 Stage: Page: 4 Total Pages: 20 J182638 DOI: 10.2118/182638-PA Date: 8-March-18 Stage: Page: 4 Total Pages: 20 fl Water Flood Polymer Flood Close to end WF End WF End WF Close PVI to end WF = 0.15 PVI = 0.5 End WF End WF PVI = 0.15 PVI = 0.5 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 PVI = 0.15 PVI = 0.19 0.7 PVI = 0.15 PVI = 0.19 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 PVI = 0.49 0.4 PVI = 0.58 0.4 PVI = 0.49 0.4 PVI = 0.58 0.4 r 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 (a) (b) (c) (a) (b) (c) Fig. 4—Oil-saturation maps at the end of waterflooding (WF) and during polymer flooding for (a) Experiment No. 2, (b) Experiment No. 6, and (c) Experiment No. 7. Fig. 4—Oil-saturation maps at the end of waterflooding (WF) and during polymer flooding for (a) Experiment No. 2, (b) Experiment Why polymer reduces CO2 No. 6, and (c) Experiment No. 7. Waterflood Modeling Using Darcy-Type Simulations Oil Recovered, MMbbls Waterflood Modeling Using Darcy-Type Simulations Methodology. The objective of this subsection is to verify whether the multiphase extension of Darcy’s law can predict the viscous- Methodology. fingering patterns observed experimentally. Clearly, a continuum Darcy-type formulation is not The objective appropriate of this subsection if viscous fingers areistrig-to verify whether the multiphase extension of Darcy’s law can predict the viscous- gered below the scale of a few pore sizes, whereas it is more likely to be validfingering patterns when fingers areobserved generated experimentally. at a macroscopic Clearly, scale.a continuum Darcy-type formulation is not appropriate if viscous fingers are trig- Nevertheless, very few validation studies are available in the literature. From the X-ray below the gered images at early of a few scaletimes, pore sizes, the viscous whereas fingers have ait is more likely to be valid when fingers are generated at a macroscopic scale. 20 40 60 80 0 100 fine dendritic aspect and a typical width of a few millimeters. Therefore, we do Nevertheless, very few validation not expect a Darcy-type model tostudies capturearetheavailable experi- in the literature. From the X-ray images at early times, the viscous fingers have a mental fingering patterns accurately, but we would like to verify how closely it can fine reproduce aspect dendriticthose and a typical width of a few millimeters. Therefore, we do not expect a Darcy-type model to capture the experi- patterns. mental In this context, the most relevant study is that of Riaz et al. (2007), where several fingering patterns experiments accurately, were performed on but we would a strongly like to verify how closely it can reproduce those patterns. water- 0 wet Berea core sample, first to measure steady-state relative permeability functions In andthis context, then the most to measure saturation relevantprofiles study isand Riaz et al. (2007), where several experiments were performed on a strongly water- thatoilofre- covery during unsteady-state displacements. Different oil viscosities up to 303 cp wetand Berea injection sample, corerates up tofirst 3 cmto3 measure steady-state relative permeability functions and then to measure saturation profiles and oil re- /min were used to iden- 3 tify the onset of instability, which was correctly predicted by the conventional covery Darcy-type during unsteady-state model dependentdisplacements. on steady-stateDifferent relative oil viscosities up to 303 cp and injection rates up to 3 cm /min were used to iden- tify the onset of instability, which permeabilities. However, the average saturation profiles of the unstable experiments could not be reproduced explicitly by high-resolu-was correctly predicted by the conventional Darcy-type model dependent on steady-state relative permeabilities. However, the average tion Darcy-type simulations modeling viscous fingers. Thus, it was concluded that the continuum Darcy-type model does not well pre- saturation profiles of the unstable experiments could not be reproduced explicitly by high-resolu- tion Darcy-type dict the flow regime with fully developed instabilities. In Sharma et al. (2012), another study was simulations performedmodeling on mildlyviscous water-wet fingers. 2D Thus, it was concluded that the continuum Darcy-type model does not well pre- micromodels. The average saturation profiles obtained from the waterflooding ofdict the flow viscous oils regime were better fully developed withreproduced instabilities. by a scaling law In Sharma et al. (2012), another study was performed on mildly water-wet 2D micromodels. The average saturation profiles obtained dependent on statistical theory rather than by a Buckley-Leverett profile, but no attempt was made to simulate the displacement with a from the waterflooding of viscous oils were better reproduced by a scaling law 2D Darcy-type model. dependent on statistical theory rather than by a Buckley-Leverett profile, but no attempt was made to simulate the displacement with a In contrast with the previously discussed studies, the experiments considered in Darcy-type 2Dthis work were model. performed under nonwater-wet con- ditions and using even higher oil viscosities. As mentioned in the Introduction section, contrast Inthis should with leadthe to previously more severe discussed studies, the experiments considered in this work were performed under nonwater-wet con- viscous fingering. r Nevertheless, a much lower injection velocity was used in these experiments compared ditionswithand those using ofeven Riazhigher et al.oil viscosities. (2007), which Asshouldmentioned at in the Introduction section, this should lead to more severe viscous fingering. Nevertheless, least partially offset the effects of higher viscosity ratio and nonwater-wet conditions. much lower Even ifa X-ray imagesinjection suggest velocity was used in these experiments compared with those of Riaz et al. (2007), which should at strong fingering least effects, it is worthwhile to test the validity of the generalized Darcy’s law on a set of partially experiments offsetthat thediffers of higher viscosity effectssignificantly from other ratio and nonwater-wet conditions. Even if X-ray images suggest strong fingering published studies. effects, it is worthwhile to test the validity of the generalized Darcy’s law on a set of experiments that differs significantly from other published In the following, we apply a similar methodology to that of Riaz et al. (2007), but because studies. of the absence of steady-state relative per- meability measurements, we use a 3D quasistatic PNM to infer relative permeability the following, In and capillary pressure a similar we applycurves. methodology Because the rockto that of Riaz et al. (2007), but because of the absence of steady-state relative per- meability measurements, we use wettability is not known precisely, we assume that the aging process has led to a wettability state ranging from mildly water-wetPNMa 3D quasistatic to to infer relative permeability and capillary pressure curves. Because the rock mildly oil-wet, including intermediate-wet and mixed-wet states. A screening study wettability is performed is not known with the quasistatic precisely, PNMwe assume code tothatgen- the aging process has led to a wettability state ranging from mildly water-wet to 200 erate multiple sets of relative permeability and capillary pressure curves. Each setmildly of curvesoil-wet, including is then provided intermediate-wet as an input to our mixed-wet states. A screening study is performed with the quasistatic PNM code to gen- andparallel IHRRS (Moncorgé et al. 2012; Jauré et al. 2014) that is run in two dimensions eratewith amultiple sets of relative high-resolution permeability discretization. and capillary Although direct pressure curves. Each set of curves is then provided as an input to our parallel measurement of steady-state relative permeabilities is of course preferable, this IHRRS (Moncorgé approach et al. 2012; is deemed useful Jauré whenetsuchal. 2014) data that are is run in two dimensions with a high-resolution discretization. Although direct not available. measurement of steady-state relative permeabilities is of course preferable, this approach is deemed useful when such data are not available. Quasistatic PNM. The 3D PNM is directly extracted from 3D microcomputed-tomography images of a sample of Bentheimer sand- stone. A maximal ball algorithm (Silin and Patzek 2006; Dong and Blunt 2009) isQuasistatic applied to reconstruct PNM. The a3D PNM is network directly extracted equivalent in terms from 3D microcomputed-tomography images of a sample of Bentheimer sand- of topology and transmissibility. The reconstructed pore network contains 61,214 stone. A maximal pores and 151,186ball algorithm throats. (Silin and Patzek Each pore/throat 2006; Dong and Blunt 2009) is applied to reconstruct a network equivalent in terms is charac- terized by an inscribed radius that controls the threshold entry pressure, a flow conductance of topologythat transmissibility. and defines the local The reconstructed pressure drop caused pore network contains 61,214 pores and 151,186 throats. Each pore/throat is charac- by viscous effect and flux, an effective length, and a volume. More details of theterized by an extracted inscribed pore networkradius can bethat controls found the threshold in Table 2, and entry pressure, a flow conductance that defines the local pressure drop caused by viscous effect and flux, an effective length, and a volume. More details of the extracted pore network can be found in Table 2, and environmental impacts an illustration is provided in Fig. 5. For our quasistatic pore-network simulations, we use the model of Valvatne and an illustration Blunt (2004),is provided which is in Fig. also used 5. to verify the qual- ity of the generated network. To do this, we compute the capillary pressure and the For our quasistatic relative permeabilitypore-network curves that simulations, we compare we withuse the model of Valvatne and Blunt (2004), which is also used to verify the qual- the generated experimental measurements. Ideally, we would like to use measurements made onitytheofsamples of Experiment To do network.Nos. this, 2, 6, andwe7,compute but such the capillary pressure and the relative permeability curves that we compare with data are not available, and we therefore use measurements from the literature experimental measurements. (Oren et al. 1998). Ideally, A very good we would agreement is like to use measurements made on the samples of Experiment Nos. 2, 6, and 7, but such found data are not available, and we therefore use measurements from the literature (Oren et al. 1998). A very good agreement is found 4 2018 SPE Journal 400 4 2018 SPE Journal ID: jaganm Time: 14:30 I Path: S:/J###/Vol00000/170137/Comp/APPFile/SA-J###170137 ID: jaganm Time: 14:30 I Path: S:/J###/Vol00000/170137/Comp/APPFile/SA-J###170137 time and for much less energ 600 Water Injected, MMbbls ● Field life significantly shortened with polyme Water Flood Polymer Flood 800 1000 ● Fluid handling requirements massively reduced by using polyme Production pro les for polymer ood and water ood from Orcadian Energy reservoir simulations; plot of recoverable oil vs. water injected based upon the same simulations. ● Polymer boosts recovery so there are more barrels produced in less ● Pumping wells and injecting fluid are the key drivers of CO2 emissions ● Polymer use significantly enhances project economics while minimising 1200 5
Emissions, by cause and scope CSR initial polymer scenario Power Demand kW 25,000 Power Demand kW Power Demand kW 20,000 20,000 Power Demand kW 18,000 18,000 20,000 20,000 16,000 16,000 18,000 Power demand kW 14,000 14,000 16,000 15,000 Power demand kW Power demand kW 14,000 12,000 12,000 Power demand kW 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 00 0 0 Year Year 11 Year Year 2 2YearYear 3 3 Year 4Year 4 Year 5 Year Year 56 Year7 6 Year Year Year 7 8 Year Year 8 9 Year 10Year Year 911 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) FPSO Heat pumps Jack-up WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Transfer Pump Pilot East gas balance 7 ● Base case from September 2020 CSR submission, focus had been on quantifying rather than driving /day) and Gas in Pilot East (bcf) 6 down emissions (included some worst case assumptions e.g. downhole pump power demands 5 4 ● Adoption of polymer flood had reduced both fluid handling and field life 3 2 1 6 )
Emissions, by cause and scope Process optimisations and recips Power Demand kW 25,000 Power Demand kW Power Demand kW 20,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 16,000 16,000 Power demand kW 14,000 14,000 15,000 Power demand kW Power demand kW 12,000 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 0 0 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 FPSO Heat pumps Jack-up FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Transfer Pump Pilot East gas balance 7 /day) and Gas in Pilot East (bcf) 6 ● Crondall reshaped process and power generation with the intention of driving down emission 5 4 ● The combination of heat pumps and high efficiency generation is the key to reducing emissions 3 2 1 9 s
SYSTEM OVERVIEW • Platform – North Sea design for 15m Hs sites – Panel based semi submersible – Makes use of harbour effect for transfer – Hydrogen energy storage can be accommodated • Turret Mooring System – Vanes into wave direction • WTG yaws independently – Multi point catenary mooring system – Disconnectable if required • Wind Turbine Generator (WTG) – Turbine agnostic – 12 to 15MW (to be assessed) • Wave Energy Convertor – 4 off, from 500kW to 1MW each (to suit site) – Wave energy converted to motion by absorber – Mechanical motion converted to electricity via oil hydraulic Power Take Off (PTO) system Intro 10
Emissions, by cause and scope Local wind and wave power Power Demand kW Power Demand kW 25,000 Power Demand kW 20,000 20,000 18,000 18,000 20,000 16,000 16,000 Power demand kW 14,000 14,000 15,000 Power demand kW 12,000 Power demand kW 12,000 10,000 10,000 10,000 8,000 8,000 6,000 6,000 5,000 4,000 4,000 2,000 2,000 0 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 0 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 FPSO Heat pumps Jack-up FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) FPSO JACK UP WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Fluids Transfer Pump (WHP) WHP-A (South) WHP-B (North) Transfer Pump Pilot East gas balance 7 ● Local renewable power eliminates the need for a gas import pipeline and halves f/day) and Gas in Pilot East (bcf) 6 5 emissions agai 4 3 ● Unit will be a 12MW wind turbine with a 2MW wave power generator from FPP 2 1 11 n
Comparison with global oil production emissions Viscous oil doesn’t have to mean high emissions ● To be comparable with this Stanford University dataset, to our Scope 1 & 2 emissions we have added ● Scope 3 emissions from offshore logistics, oil transportation to the refinery, and polymer productio Pilot emissions will lie in the ● Estimates of emissions during the exploration and development phases (done using the Stanford tool) lowest 5% of ● Pilot field comparable emissions are 1.4 gCO2eq/MJ with a single wind turbine global oil production Masnadi et al (2018). Global carbon intensity of crude oil production. Science. 361. 851-853. 10.1126/science.aar6859. 12 : n
Auditor: PKF Littlejohn Broker: WH Ireland Banker: Barclays 15 Westferry Circus 24 Martin Lane, Level 25, 1 Churchill Place, London E14 4HD London EC4R 0DR London, E14 5HP Lawyer: Hill Dickinson Lawyer: TandonHildebrand Registrar: Neville The Broadgate Tower, 20 Primrose Stree Labs Atrium, Chalk Farm Rd Neville House, Steelpark Road, London EC2A 2EW London, NW1 8AH Halesowen, B62 8HD Public Relations: Tavistock Competent Person: Sproule Registered Of ce 1 Cornhill, President Kennedylaan 19 6th Floor 60 Gracechurch Street, London, London EC3V 3NR 2517 JK Den Haag, The Netherlands United Kingdom, EC3V 0HR Head Of ce Contact Details email: steve.brown@orcadian.energ 6th Floor 60 Gracechurch Street, telephone: +44 (0) 20 3603 194 London, United Kingdom, EC3V 0HR twitter: @orcadian_energ website: https://orcadian.energy ORCADIAN ENERGY PLC 13 fi fi y , 1 y t
You can also read