LongView Corporate Board Report - Aphria Inc - Rotman School of Management
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Preface: Outside the Box Welcome to LongView. Your customized report on Aphria Inc.’s corporate governance disclosure, process and structure. Over the past 20 years, our researchers have learned that while there is likely no single best practice, good governance is a critical part of long-term, sustainable value creation. LongView is an evolution in governance reporting, enabling you to compare elements of Aphria Inc.’s governance to other issuers at a glance, while moving away from the Johnston Centre’s previous judgment-based approach. The Johnston Centre has developed LongView reports for every issuer (207) on the S&P/TSX Composite Index (TSX Index). Access reports on other issuers at www.rotman.utoronto.ca/Johnston. Aphria Inc. (APHA) Corporate Profile TSX Index Market Cap Fiscal Industry: Market Cap: Rank: Region: Year End: Health Care $5.2 billion 97 / 207 Ontario, Canada 5/31 APHA Ownership Type: Widely-Held *$4.75B is the median market capitalization as of January 21, APHA Size Peer Group: Market Cap Over $4.75B* 2021 among our sample of 207 TSX Index companies Ownership Type 78% 10% 12% Breakdown: Widely-Held Controlled: Single-Class Controlled: Dual-Class 2020 TSX Index No shareholder or entity A shareholder or a block of At least 30% of all votes are holds shares with at least related shareholders controlled by a shareholder or a 30% voting control of the controls at least 30% of all block of related shareholders corporation. votes. using a share class with superior voting rights. The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation—LongView/ 2
Board Composition Boards require the right people with an Board Size array of skills and perspectives to advise and oversee the organization. This section Comparisons provides a snapshot of the salient features of Aphria Inc. board's composition—size, TSX independence, committee independence, APHA Index Health Care Widely-Held demographics and director tenure—as it compares to other issuers across the TSX 7 9.7 avg 8.0 avg 9.5 avg Index. Highlights: Board Size Distribution Board Renewal Practices TSX Index in 2020 The Johnston Centre tracks several variables on board renewal. Below you’ll find what we learned about Aphria Inc.’s renewal policies and the adoption of renewal policies across the TSX Index: Does APHA have a director term limit? No 29.0% TSX Index Adoption Does APHA have a director retirement age limit? No 37.2% TSX Index Adoption Board Demographic Composition Comparisons Category APHA TSX Index Health Care Widely-Held Percentage (number) of Women* 28.6% (2) 28.8% 25% 28.4% Percentage (number) of Aboriginal Peoples or Visible Minorities* 0% (0) 5.1% 0% 4.2% Average Age 57.0 61.9 59.5 62.1 Average Tenure 0.9 7.4 2.8 6.9 *Peer Group numbers are averages. The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation — LongView/ 3
Board Independence There are a multitude of definitions and guidelines around director independence, which can make it Aphria Inc. difficult to meet everybody’s expectations. The Board Independence Johnston Centre understands that independence Independent directors: Audit Committee: involves much more than can be measured on 6 / 7 (85.7%) 2/2 (100%) Independent paper. We do, however, gather many variables related to the various relationships that directors CEO/Chair Roles Split: Human Resources might have to a company. No Committee: 1/1 (100%) Independent In this section, we summarize what we know about the Lead Director: independence of the Aphria Inc. board and provide Yes Nominating Committee: comparisons to other companies on the TSX Index. 1/1 (100%) Independent Types of Material Relationships on TSX Index Boards Business with Related Party Executives of the Family the Corporation Executives Company Ties 21.7% of issuers have board 15.9% of issuers 13.5% of issuers 12.1% of issuers are members that are lawyers or other have an executive have more than one considered family professionals retained by the from a parent/ company executive enterprises, with at least one company, or owners/executives that subsidiary/sister on the board. generation of family control a third-party entity engaged company on the succession and family in business with the company. board. members on the board. Board Independence Comparisons Average Board Companies with an Companies with a Lead Director if Peer Group Independence Independent Chair Chair is Non-Independent TSX Index 81.1% 66.2% 85.7% Health Care 71.5% 42.9% 100.0% Widely-Held 84.0% 77.0% 89.2% Committee Independence Comparisons Audit Human Resources Governance Nominating Peer Group Committee Committee Committee Committee TSX Index 99.5% 91.8% 87.9% 89.9% Health Care 100% 71.4% 71.4% 85.7% Widely-Held 100% 98.7% 95.6% 97.5% The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation — LongView/ 4
Board Compensation This section provides a snapshot of the Aphria Inc. Aphria Inc. board’s compensation—features, total cost, and pay Board Compensation Info breakdown—compared against other TSX Index peer groups. 2019 Average Compensation per Director: $294,940 Director Share Ownership Comparisons: Requirement*: 1x 2019 Average Pay per Director 2019 Total Board Compensation : $2,064,579 *Multiple of total retainer incl. cash and equity. Highlights: Board Compensation The Johnston Centre tracks the TSX Index: Prevalence of Director Share Ownership adoption and disclosure of several corporate governance parameters Guidelines as a Multiple of Total Retainer related to how corporate boards are paid. Below you’ll find what we learned about Aphria Inc. and adoption rate among Health Care peers (Industry). Are APHA Directors Required To Hold Shares? Yes 97.1% Industry Adoption. Does APHA Pay Committee Fees? No 43% Industry Adoption. Comparisons: Compensation Breakdown Per Director in 2019 Does APHA Pay Board Meeting Fees? No 0% Industry Adoption. Do APHA Directors Receive Options? No 29% Industry Adoption. The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation — LongView/ 5
CEO Compensation CEO compensation is a key responsibility of the board. Highlights: Every public board makes different decisions about CEO pay, often motivated by several considerations: recruitment TSX Index CEO Pay and retention, resource allocation, shareholder concerns, The Johnston Centre tracked several company value and performance, and peer parameters on the compensation compensation. This section provides a snapshot of the governance of TSX Index companies in Aphria Inc. 2019 CEO compensation and characterizes 2020. Below we compare Aphria Inc. to overall pay according to the largest component: cash or other companies in the Health Care equity. Compensation features and breakdown of pay are sector (Industry). compared against TSX Index peers. Aphria Inc. CEO Compensation Info & Comparisons Does relative corporate financial CEO Total Pay: CEO Pay Type: performance affect the CEO’s bonus $9,577,296 Equity Focused at APHA? No 14% Industry adoption. Market Cap Over $4.75B Health Care CEO Pay Median: CEO Pay Median: Does APHA disclose bonus metrics $7,320,359 $9,577,296 linking the CEO’s bonus to corporate financial performance? Yes 100% Industry adoption. CEO Pay Types: TSX Index in 2019 Cash Focused Balanced Equity Focused Does APHA disclose the weight given CEO Pay CEO Pay CEO Pay to each financial metric affecting the 37% of issuers: 19% of issuers: 43% of issuers: CEO’s bonus payout? Yes Cash makes up at Neither cash nor Equity awards make 57% Industry adoption. least 60% of the equity make up at up at least 60% of CEO’s compensation least 60% of the CEO’s the CEO’s excluding pension. compensation compensation Can APHA’s CEO receive no bonus excluding pension. excluding pension. for not meeting targets under the plan? Yes 71% Industry adoption. Comparison: CEO Pay Breakdown in 2019 Does the APHA CEO receive equity awards with performance hurdles that consider relative corporate financial performance? No 42% Industry adoption. Does APHA disclose a claw-back policy that enables the Board to recoup for reasons that do not require a financial restatement? No 42% Industry adoption. The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation — LongView/ 6
Disclosure Examples In this section, we highlight several areas where companies are less likely to earn maximum points in The Globe and Mail’s annual corporate board ranking “Board Games”. In each area, we indicate the 2020 result for Aphria Inc. and offer examples of disclosure that meet the criteria for each question, which can be used as optional guides. Board Games Questions with Low Adoption Rates TSX Index Board Games APHA with max Question # Score score (%) References to Examples of Disclosure 7. b) Does the 2/2 49% Intact Financial Corp earns full marks, because its circular discloses a company describe board gender diversity policy that includes a target for the representation of women, and shows how the board has surpassed how it considers the the target. representation of women for the Reference: Intact Financial Corporation. (2020). Management Information Circular, 60. Retrieved from board of directors? http://www.intactfc.com/English/investors/financial-reports-and- filings/default.aspx 8. Has the company 0/2 2% Cameco Corp earns full marks, because its circular discloses a addressed diversity diversity policy that requires at least one board member to identify as Indigenous and explains how the requirement has been met. on its board in areas other than gender? Reference: Cameco Corporation. (2020). Management Information Circular, 29. Retrieved from https://www.cameco.com/media/media- library/documents/management-proxy-circular 9. Does the board 0/3 59% Canadian Tire Corp earns full marks, because its circular discloses have a system to how board and individual director peer assessments are conducted. Reference: Canadian Tire Corporation. (2020). Management evaluate its Information Circular, 27-28. Retrieved from https:// performance? corp.canadiantire.ca/English/investors/financials-reporting/annual- disclosures/default.aspx 25. Does the 1/2 35% ATCO Ltd earns full marks, because its circular discloses that company disclose it directors have the discretion to recoup bonus payments if they discover wrongdoing. Several activities constitute wrongdoing, and has a provision to financial restatement is not required. 'claw back' bonus Reference: ATCO Ltd. (2020). Management Information Circular, payments to the 41. Retrieved from www.atco.com/en-ca/about-us/investors/ - - CEO if wrongdoing documents-filings.html is discovered? 33. Does the 0/2 14% Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Inc earns full marks, because its circular company describe discloses the board committee responsible for reviewing related- party transactions, which parties are considered related, and the how it deals with criteria used to evaluate related-party transactions. related-party Reference: Ritchie Bros. Auctioneers Incorporated. (2020). transactions? Management Information Circular, 38. Retrieved from https:// investor.ritchiebros.com/financials/sec-filings/default.aspx The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation — LongView/ 7
Our Donors The David & Sharon Johnston Centre for Corporate Governance Innovation at the Rotman School relies on the financial support of its sponsors to fund events and research. We would like to thank the following sponsors for their generous support. Founding Partners The Rogers Foundation ATCO Limited KPMG LLP Anonymous Founding Supporters Great-West Life Assurance Company Mackenzie Investments Power Corporation of Canada Partners Brendan Calder Canadian Tire Corporation Ltd. Langar Foundation in honour of Dr. Gail Regan Robert McEwen The Bay Tree Foundation The Jay and Barbara Hennick Family Foundation The Ralph M. Barford Foundation Viewpoint Foundation Rotman School of Management 105 St. George Street, Toronto Ontario, Canada M5S 3E6 t 416-978-4930 E matt.fullbrook@rotman.utoronto.ca
You can also read