Liste der Veröffentlichungen des Think Tank des EP - European ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Liste der Veröffentlichungen des Think Tank des EP
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank
Suchkriterien für die Erstellung der Liste :
Sortierung Nach Datum ordnen
Schlagwortliste "Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft"
14 Ergebnisse
Erstellungsdatum : 17-02-2022Identifying Optimal Policy Making and Legislation
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum 15-05-2019
Externe AutorProf. Dr. Sion Jones
Politikbereich
Annahme von Rechtsvorschriften durch das EP und den Rat | Bewertung von Rechtsvorschriften und politischen
Maßnahmen in der Praxis | Binnenmarkt und Zollunion | EU-Recht: Rechtsordnung und Rechtsakte | Rechte des
geistigen Eigentums | Vorausplanung
Schlagwortliste Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Binnenmarkt | EU-Wachstumsstrategie | Verbraucherschutz
Zusammenfassung This Briefing forms part of a programme of research commissioned by the Internal Market and Consumer Protection
Committee of the European Parliament (‘the IMCO Committee’). The research programme has the aim of updating the
study undertaken for the IMCO Committee in 2014 on the “Contribution of the Internal Market and Consumer
Protection to Growth”. The overall aim is to provide background information and advice for IMCO Committee members
on the benefits of legislation established in the field of internal market and consumer protection and to reflect on priority
measures and actions to be undertaken in this field. A workshop was held in Brussels on 10th July 2018, at which
progress on this programme of research was presented and discussed.
This Briefing focusses on tools for use in the identification of optimal policy making and their application in the area of
the internal market and consumer protection. It uses the smart Single Market regulation concept – developed in earlier
research for the IMCO Committee - to present the tools for optimal policy making and to assess the development of
policy for the internal market and consumer protection.
First, some context is provided with a discussion of the Europe 2020 targets, the “Contribution to growth” report and
the Juncker Plan. Second, the smart Single Market regulation concept is introduced and finally policy developments
and legislation for the internal market and consumer protection are discussed with recommendations for improvements
to the policy-making process.
Briefing EN
EYE 2016 – Fresh money: What would you do with €300 billion?
Art der Veröffentlichung Auf einen Blick
Kalenderdatum 28-04-2016
Verfasser DELIVORIAS Angelos
Politikbereich Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | EU-Investition | Fonds (EU) | Investitionsbeihilfe | Investitionsförderung | System zur
Finanzierung der EU
Zusammenfassung Investment in the EU has dropped by 15% compared to its 2007 pre-crisis peak, and has yet to recover. Less
investment slows the pace of recovery and can potentially hurt growth and competitiveness. The Investment Plan for
Europe, launched 18 months ago, aims to reverse this trend and put Europe back on track, mobilising €300 billion and
creating around a million jobs. XXXXXXXX Please click here for the full publication in PDF format
Auf einen Blick EN
Helicopter money: A cure for what ails the euro area?
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
21-04-2016
Verfasser
KARAKAS Cemal
Politikbereich
Finanz- und Bankenangelegenheiten | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Antikrisenplan | Euro-Währungsgebiet | Europäische Zentralbank | Geldpolitik |
Kreditpolitik | Lage der Europäischen Union | Stagnation der Wirtschaft | Verbrauchernachfrage | Wirtschaftsanalyse |
Wirtschaftslage
Zusammenfassung 'Helicopter money', or 'helicopter drops' of money, generally refers to a non-standard monetary policy tool used in
deflationary conditions. It can be understood as a permanent increase in the nominal stock of fiat base money at
lowest nominal interest rates. Some experts call for its use in the euro area, arguing that the interest-free distribution of
additional money to the private sector would increase consumption and investments, and help jump-start the EU
economy. In practical terms, there are different proposals for distributing helicopter money, which may entail fiscal
policy measures, such as government bonds, or printed-money-financed tax relief for private households. Some
empirical studies show that tax rebates have had positive macroeconomic effects in certain countries. Helicopter
money is also criticised, however. Some experts argue that it would have a negative impact on public sector (or central
bank) balance sheets. Others say it may prompt indebted euro-area countries to pull back from unpopular fiscal and
structural reforms. Helicopter money, it is argued, could also undermine the stability of the euro, by triggering 'runaway'
inflation or reducing the incentive to work. There are also questions about the legality of helicopter money. Some
experts believe it is permissible under EU law, citing Article 20 (Other instruments of monetary control) of the Protocol
on the European Central Bank's statute. The Bank has a rather reluctant stance, arguing that the very idea runs
counter to Article 123(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, which prohibits the direct financing of
public expenditure.
Briefing EN
Multimedia Helicopter Money
17-02-2022 Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP 1The OECD Interim Economic Outlook: Stronger collective fiscal policy needed
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
12-04-2016
Verfasser
KARAKAS Cemal
Politikbereich
Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | China | die Vereinigte Staaten | einheitliche Währungspolitik | Euro-Währungsgebiet |
Haushaltspolitik | Investitionsförderung | Japan | Lage der Europäischen Union | Sparpolitik | Strukturanpassung |
Wirtschaftslage | Wirtschaftswachstum
Zusammenfassung According to the 2016 Interim Economic Outlook of the Organisation for Economic Co operation and Development
(OECD), global GDP growth this year is projected to be the slowest in five years. The OECD has lowered its real GDP
growth forecast for the euro area for 2016 from 1.8% to 1.4%, and for 2017 from 1.9% to 1.7%. While low inflation and
prices are discouraging commodity exporters, low investment and demand have led to stagnation, stifling wage and
employment developments. The OECD recommends a stronger collective policy response in order to strengthen
demand. While the impetus for structural reform has slowed in many countries, contractionary fiscal policy has gained
new momentum. Monetary policy alone is considered to be insufficient. A sustainable mix of structural, monetary and
fiscal policy measures must be deployed in order to boost GDP growth and counter deflationary tendencies. The policy
mix, however, varies from country to country, as countries are being affected in different ways by the international
economic crisis.
Briefing EN
Japan's national budget: Procedure and the public debt burden
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
25-02-2016
Verfasser
D'AMBROGIO Enrico | PARRY Matthew
Politikbereich
Haushalt
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Ausführung des Haushaltsplans | Haushaltspolitik | Haushaltsverfahren | institutionelle
Reform | Japan | Staatshaushalt | Wirtschaftslage | öffentliche Schulden
Zusammenfassung Japan's budget is compiled by its Ministry of Finance based on estimates from other ministries and guidance from the
Cabinet, before being approved by the Diet. In Japan's parliamentary system, the executive is drawn from the majority
in the House of Representatives, the Diet's lower house, which generally prevails in budgetary matters over the upper
House of Councillors. However, bills for what are known as 'special deficit-financing bonds' require the approval of the
House of Councillors, which can delay the budgetary procedure if that house is dominated by the opposition.
Budget-makers are formally constrained by the 1947 Public Finance Act (PFA), Article 4 of which stipulates that the
government may only issue 'construction bonds' to finance investment in infrastructure, as opposed to covering
ongoing social security spending. This constraint is belied by two major, and interlinked, fiscal challenges facing Japan:
the increasing share of social transfers in the budget, which is connected to the ageing of the population and a
structural decline in Japan's economic capacity; and an ever-growing gross national debt that, at 246% of GDP, in
relative terms already dwarfs that of any other G7 nation.
Almost every year since 1975, governments have circumvented the strictures of the PFA by enacting a law
empowering them to issue special deficit-financing bonds, which have since grown to make up the lion's share of the
national debt. The current government, led by Shinzō Abe of the Liberal Democratic Party, has set out a plan to arrest
the growth in the debt pile by 2020.
Briefing EN
Secular stagnation and the euro area
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
08-02-2016
Verfasser
GIMDAL Gustaf | KARAKAS Cemal
Politikbereich
Finanz- und Bankenangelegenheiten | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Angebot und Nachfrage | Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Antikrisenplan | die Vereinigte Staaten | Euro-Währungsgebiet |
Geldpolitik | Lage der Europäischen Union | Stagnation der Wirtschaft | Wirtschaftsanalyse | Wirtschaftslage
Zusammenfassung Several years after the Great Recession began, the euro area is still far from fully recovered. The international
economic and financial crisis has pushed down investment levels within the EU by about 15% from their peak in 2007.
Even though the near-term prospects seem brighter, high unemployment persists in many Member States. Some
experts argue that the euro area, alongside Japan and the United States, is facing 'secular stagnation', a long-term
economic stagnation characterised by a shrinking work force, low demand, excess savings and low investments,
despite low interest rates and deflationary tendencies. The complexity of the ongoing crisis and the diverging economic
situations of the Member States participating in the euro area make it difficult to predict future developments, as there
is no common cure for long-term stagnation. Some believe that if the demand side is spurred, it would help boost the
economy. In this context, the European Commission launched a number of measures in 2015, among which the
European Fund for Strategic Investments (EFSI), with the aim of mobilising at least €315 billion worth of investments in
the real economy by 2017. But it is also important to improve the supply side, which shapes the investment
environment. Furthermore, in December 2015 the European Central Bank (ECB) extended its quantitative easing
programme (in particular, the asset purchase programme (APP)) until at least March 2017 as a way to provide further
liquidity and stability to Member States' financial markets.
Briefing EN
17-02-2022 Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP 2The ECB's Quantitative Easing: Early results and possible risks
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
08-12-2015
Verfasser
DELIVORIAS Angelos
Politikbereich
Finanz- und Bankenangelegenheiten | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | das Vereinigte Königreich | die Vereinigte Staaten | einheitliche Währungspolitik | Euro-
Währungsgebiet | Finanzmarkt | Geldmenge | Geldpolitik | Japan | Kreditpolitik | Liquidität | Marktintervention |
Wirtschaftsanalyse
Zusammenfassung In early 2015, at a time when most indicators of actual and expected inflation in the euro area had drifted towards
historic lows, the European Central Bank (ECB) announced that it would launch a new asset purchase programme,
which would be similar in many respects to the 'Quantitative Easing' (QE) programmes launched earlier by the United
States Federal Reserve System, the Bank of England and the Bank of Japan.
Researchers have published extensively on issues relating to the programme. On one hand, empirical evidence from
previous QE programmes (in the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan), shows that contrary to 'textbook'
theory, the ECB's Public Sector Purchase Programme is expected to have negligible direct effect on the economy,
contributing more through indirect effects. On the other hand, most researchers agree that the many concerns raised –
e.g. there would be insufficient liquidity in the markets for the programme to have an impact; side effects would
increase risks to financial stability or worsen income inequality; or that the risk-sharing arrangements could exert
pressures on euro area solidarity in the event that a Member State declared bankruptcy − have not so far materialised.
And, should they eventually come about, they would neither present significant risks to the euro area economy (in
terms of direct losses or financial stability), nor create tensions between Member States, or between different
population classes within a Member State. However, unwinding the current programme may present significant risks,
so to avoid or at least mitigate them, careful planning of the timing and speed of the exit, complementing it with micro
and macro-prudential supervision, as well as fiscal policy measures are all important.
This briefing updates an earlier edition from the time of the ECB announcement.
Briefing EN
Briefing for the Economic Dialogue and Exchange of Views with Vice-President Dombrovskis,
Commissioner Moscovici and Commissioner Thyssen in ECON and EMPL on 1 December 2015
Art der Veröffentlichung Briefing
Kalenderdatum 30-11-2015
Verfasser CIUCCI MATTEO | HAGELSTAM Kajus | HRADISKY Martin | MESNARD Benoit | VEGA BORDELL Javier María |
ZOPPÉ Alice
Politikbereich Europäisches Semester | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Bekämpfung der Arbeitslosigkeit | Euro-Währungsgebiet | Haushaltspolitik |
Investitionspolitik | Koordinierung der WWU-Politiken | Steuerpolitik | Strukturanpassung
Zusammenfassung Vice-President Dombrovskis, Commissioner Moscovici and Commissioner Thyssen are participating in an Economic
Dialogue on the Annual Growth Survey, the Alert Mechanism Report and the draft Council Recommendations to the
Euro Area. The Economic Governance Support Unit has prepared a briefing prior to this Economic Dialogue, which
takes place on the basis of the economic governance framework, notably Article 2-ab of Regulation 1466/97 as
amended in 2011.
Briefing EN
Education policy in the Europe 2020 Strategy
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
25-11-2015
Verfasser
CHIRCOP Denise
Politikbereich
Bildung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | berufsbildender Unterricht | Bildungspolitik | dauerhafte Entwicklung | EU-
Wachstumsstrategie | europäische Sozialpolitik | Hochschulausbildung | Jugendpolitik | Mitgliedstaat der EU | offene
Koordinierungsmethode | Sekundarstufe | Statistik der EU
Zusammenfassung In 2010, the EU adopted its Europe 2020 strategy to put Member States back on track following the crisis shocks of
2008. Education was identified as one of five key areas needing specific measures to support economic recovery
which could not be based exclusively on financial and budgetary reforms.
The governance of the strategy rests on yearly cycles of reporting and feedback known as the European Semester.
This makes it possible to monitor progress in individual Member States as a basis for recommendations from the
European Commission. Supplementary thematic coordination involves both political leaders and experts in the field.
Coordinated by the Council of the European Union, the mechanism is referred to as the open method of coordination.
Member States are on their way towards meeting the Europe 2020 education targets: lowering the number of early
school leavers to less than 10% and ensuring that at least 40% of 30-34 year olds have completеd tertiary education.
However, EU citizens are not yet benefitting evenly from the positive outcomes. A closer look reveals that some
regions and segments of the population fare less well than others. At the same time, employment rates have worsened
in spite of improvements in the general level of education. The European Parliament has expressed its stance on these
issues, indicating possible ways forward.
Briefing EN
17-02-2022 Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP 3The minimum wage: A motor for growth or a brake on the economy?
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
23-09-2015
Verfasser
KARAKAS Cemal
Politikbereich
Beschäftigung | Sozialpolitik | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Arbeitslosigkeit | Arbeitsmarkt | Interventionspolitik | Kaufkraft | Lohnkosten | Mindestlohn
| Niedriglohn | Steueranreiz | Vermögensverteilung | wirtschaftliche Auswirkung | Wirtschaftsliberalismus
Zusammenfassung Setting minimum wages are a direct way for governments to influence wage levels. Even though they are one of the
most analysed and debated topics in economics, their impact on (un-)employment, growth and poverty remains
ambiguous. For some experts, the rise of minimum wages will lead to job losses, as it increases the cost of labour.
Others argue that minimum wages not only prevent the creation of a 'working poor' class, but create jobs by increasing
employee purchasing power. The empirical evidence from OECD countries does not provide a clear answer. Over
recent years, the focus of the debate has switched from the macro-economic effects to the social dimension of
minimum wages. A statutory minimum wage is increasingly considered a useful tool to ensure fair wages and social
inclusion. The international financial crisis widened the gap on minimum wage levels between many Member States. At
the same time, it gave new momentum to the debate on 'just' minimum wages, low wage immigration and a
harmonised minimum wage rate for all Member States. The idea of combining minimum wages with fiscal policy
measures such as tax relief, earned income tax credits or additional income support provisions to increase low paid
employees' incomes is a subject for further discussion. The European Parliament (EP) has adopted several resolutions
against 'in work poverty' and social exclusion over recent years. The minimum wage is increasingly considered to be a
tool which ensures fair wages and social inclusion.
Briefing EN
The ECB and the financial crisis: Rigid theory vs a pragmatic approach
Art der Veröffentlichung Briefing
Kalenderdatum 16-07-2015
Verfasser KARAKAS Cemal
Politikbereich Finanz- und Bankenangelegenheiten | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Deflation | einheitliche Währungspolitik | Europäische Zentralbank | Institutionelle
Zuständigkeit (EU) | Interventionspolitik | Koordinierung der WWU-Politiken | Kreditpolitik | Liquiditätskontrolle |
Wirtschaftsliberalismus | Wirtschaftswissenschaft | Währungskrise
Zusammenfassung The European Central Bank's (ECB) main objective is stable inflation in the Economic and Monetary Union (EMU).
During the financial crisis, the ECB decided to face the economic slump by, amongst other actions, increasing and
then decreasing interest rates and the money supply. In addition, it launched a quantitative easing (QE) programme
which aims to stabilise some Member State economies. The ECB's monetary decisions evoked mixed reactions in the
euro area and triggered a debate on the relevance of price stability, austerity and deficit spending.
The ECB's monetary policy is broadly in line with Monetarist economic theory, according to which, changes in money
supply are the main determining factor for business fluctuation – in both a positive and a negative sense. During the
crisis, however, the very different Keynesian economic model – notably increasing public spending and fiscal policy
measures to stimulate the economy – experienced a revival.
Beyond the debate on the right theories and their practical application in combating economic downturn, the ECB
demonstrated more pragmatism than before the crisis by, for example, adjusting and expanding its toolkit. The ECB,
along with some experts, argue that only the combination of monetary and fiscal measures can end deflation and
recession in the EMU.
Briefing EN
Experiences with the Current EU Economic Governance Framework – Proceedings from a Workshop of
10 December 2014
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum
16-12-2014
Verfasser
ANGERER Jost | FORGACS Annamaria | HRADISKY Martin
Politikbereich
Europäisches Semester | Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | Banksystem | Deflation | Euro-Währungsgebiet | Governance | Haushaltspolitik |
Koordinierung der WWU-Politiken | Lohnkosten | wirtschaftliche Konvergenz | Wirtschaftsanalyse
Zusammenfassung This briefing provides a summary of a workshop on the experiences with the current economic governance framework
in the European Union (EU) held in European Parliament on the request of the Economic and Monetary Affairs
Committee. The aim of the workshop was to provide expertise in the context of preparation of the INI report on
stocktaking and future challenges in economic governance (Rapporteur Pervenche Bérès). The workshop focused on
"stocktaking" as regards the current economic governance framework. The presentations given during the workshop
are available on the homepage of the European Parliament.
Briefing EN
17-02-2022 Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP 4The €315 billion Investment Plan for Europe
Art der Veröffentlichung
Auf einen Blick
Kalenderdatum 10-12-2014
Verfasser
DELIVORIAS Angelos
Politikbereich
Wirtschaft und Währung
Schlagwortliste
Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | EU-Aktion | EU-Investition | Finanzierung der EU | Finanzierungsart | Investitionsbeihilfe |
Investitionsförderung | Investitionsschutz | Investitionsvorhaben | private Investition
Zusammenfassung The economic and financial crisis led to a 14% reduction in investment in the EU from the pre-crisis peak of 2007 (€2
606 billion in 2013, compared to €3 039 billion in 2007, in 2013 prices), despite a pressing need for more investment.
The European Commission believes that this is due to uncertainty regarding potential growth leading to excessive risk
aversion among many investors. It sees the solution in using public funds to encourage the private sector to invest
more.
Auf einen Blick EN
G20 Summit in Brisbane: Low Expectations, Limited Progress?
Art der Veröffentlichung
Briefing
Kalenderdatum 21-11-2014
Verfasser
BENDINI Roberto | TROSZCZYNSKA VAN GENDEREN Wanda
Politikbereich
Auswärtige Angelegenheiten | Binnenmarkt und Zollunion | Energie | Entwicklung und humanitäre Hilfe | Finanz- und
Bankenangelegenheiten | Globale Ordnungspolitik | Internationaler Handel | Landwirtschaft und Entwicklung des
ländlichen Raums | Umwelt | Vorausplanung | Öffentliche Gesundheit
Schlagwortliste Ankurbelung der Wirtschaft | die Russische Föderation | die Ukraine | Energiezusammenarbeit | Finanzbestimmung |
Gipfeltreffen | Internationale Finanzierung | internationales Steuerrecht | Klimaschutzpolitik | Korruption |
Liberalisierung des Handels | Steuerreform | Welthandelsorganisation | zwischenstaatliche Organisation
Zusammenfassung The recent Group of 20 (G20) summit in Brisbane aimed to coordinate global action to support a transition from
containing the financial crisis to supporting economic recovery. The Australian presidency’s agenda privileged
discussions on concrete steps to facilitate growth and build resilience by completing financial reforms and taking action
on tax issues and corruption. The programme also sought to strengthen the G20 partners' cooperation on trade and
energy. While the meeting, held on 15-16 November 2014, did deliver some concrete economic commitments, the
accomplishments were overshadowed by underlying geopolitical concerns. In bilateral discussions with Russian
President Vladimir Putin, some G20 leaders – including from the EU, a full member of the Group – criticised Russia's
actions in eastern Ukraine and its failure to ensure a proper investigation into the crash of Malaysia Airlines Flight 17.
With other areas of focus including climate change (thanks in part to the efforts of the EU), energy cooperation and
fighting Ebola, the summit's middling score sheet – with modest progress at best – looked rather similar to those of
recent G20 summits.
Briefing EN
17-02-2022 Quelle : © Europäische Union, 2022 - EP 5You can also read
