Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University

Page created by Christopher Hawkins
 
CONTINUE READING
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

                                                                     Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

                                               Journal of South American Earth Sciences
                                                           journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jsames

Paleoenvironments and paleoecology of the Santa Cruz Formation
(early-middle Miocene) along the Río Santa Cruz, Patagonia (Argentina)
Richard F. Kay a, *, Sergio F. Vizcaíno b, c, M. Susana Bargo b, d, Jackson P. Spradley e,
José I. Cuitiño f
a
  Department of Evolutionary Anthropology and Division of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27708, USA
b
   División Paleontología Vertebrados, Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y Museo, Unidades de Investigación, Anexo Museo, Av. 60 y 122, 1900, La Plata, Argentina
c
  Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Argentina
d
   Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas, Provincia de Buenos Aires (CICPBA), Argentina
e
  North Carolina State University - College of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Molecular Biomedical Sciences. Raleigh, NC, USA
f
  Instituto Patagónico de Geología y Paleontología Centro Nacional Patagónico, Puerto Madryn (U9120), Argentina

A R T I C L E I N F O                                       A B S T R A C T

Keywords:                                                   The continental early-middle Miocene Santa Cruz Formation (SCF) in Austral Patagonia contains the best record
Ecometrics                                                  of South American mammalian faunas prior to the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI) and is of particular
Paleobiology                                                interest because it is the best preserved high-latitude continental biotic record in the Southern Hemisphere
Paleoclimate
                                                            spanning the mid-Miocene Climatic Optimum. Through intensive fieldwork we recovered numerous fossil ver­
Mammals
Neogene
                                                            tebrates, mostly mammals, from the SCF along the Río Santa Cruz (RSC), the type area for the formation and its
South America                                               fauna. We examine whether the SCF fauna differed among three distinct temporal intervals of the SCF spanning,
Frugivore problem                                           from the oldest to youngest, the Atlantic coastal suite of localities Fossil Levels (FL) 1–7, at about 17.4 Ma,
                                                            through localities in the RSC Barrancas Blancas (BB), between ~17.2 and ~16.3 Ma, and Segundas Barrancas
                                                            Blancas (SBB), between ~16.5 and ~15.6 Ma. With the objective of reconstructing paleoenvironmental and
                                                            community structure of these RSC faunas, we compared them with 55 extant lowland mammalian localities
                                                            across South America from 8◦ N to 55◦ S latitude representing a wide range of seasonality and, annual rainfall
                                                            and temperature, as well as canopy height and net primary productivity, sampling communities ranging from
                                                            tropical rainforest to semi-arid steppe. Extant nonvolant mammalian genera at each locality were assigned a
                                                            body size interval and niche parameters reflecting diet and substrate use, from behavioral data in the literature.
                                                            Extinct genera were assigned similar niche metrics on the basis of their morphology. From the generic niche
                                                            parameters, we compiled indices and ratios that express vectors of the community structure of each fauna,
                                                            including the total number of genera, the pervasiveness of arboreality, frugivory, and browsing, and the relative
                                                            richness of predators to their prey. The community structure variables were used to model community structure
                                                            of the fossil localities based on uniformitarian principles. The fossil sample includes 44 genera of mammals from
                                                            FL 1–7, 38 genera from BB, and 44 genera from SBB. The Simpson Coefficients of faunal similarity among the
                                                            fossil localities are no greater than expected on the basis of the geographic distances among them, and do not
                                                            suggest any apparent climatic differences. Based on the models we obtained no significant differences in MAP
                                                            (Mean Annual Precipitation) for FL 1–7, BB and SBB, with mean estimates of 1635 mm, 1451 mm, and 1504 mm,
                                                            with the confidence intervals for the estimates overlapping widely. MAT (Mean Annual Temperature) estimates
                                                            are between ~21 ◦ C and ~22 ◦ C for FL 1–7 and SBB, possibly lower at 16 ◦ C for BB, but with a wide and
                                                            overlapping range of estimates. Temperature seasonality is modest (3 ◦ C to 4 ◦ C) and similar for all localities.
                                                            Canopy heights exceed 20 m for all sites. Despite these geographic and inferred climatic similarities, the presence
                                                            of certain key taxa (e.g., the caviomorph rodent Prolagostomus and the typothere Pachyrukhos) together with an
                                                            increased overall abundance and richness of rodents with ever-growing cheek teeth suggests a trend to aridifi­
                                                            cation in the upper part of the SCF at SBB compared with FL 1–7 and BB. Taken together, we propose that the SCF
                                                            paleoenvironment consisted largely of semi-deciduous forests ranging into savannas with gallery-forest com­
                                                            ponents. This range of habitats occurs today where the mesic inland Atlantic forests of Southern Brazil,

  * Corresponding author.
    E-mail addresses: richard.kay@duke.edu (R.F. Kay), vizcaino@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar (S.F. Vizcaíno), msbargo@fcnym.unlp.edu.ar (M.S. Bargo), jpspradl@ncsu.edu
(J.P. Spradley), jcuitino@cenpat-conicet.gob.ar (J.I. Cuitiño).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2021.103296
Received 9 December 2020; Received in revised form 23 March 2021; Accepted 23 March 2021
Available online 29 March 2021
0895-9811/© 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                           Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

                                                northeastern Argentina and eastern Paraguay give way northwestward into the more xeric Paraguayan Gran
                                                Chaco. These interpretations are in general agreement with other sources of evidence from sedimentology,
                                                paleosols, isotopes, paleobotany and other faunal elements. We highlight the value of focusing paleoenvir­
                                                onmental and paleocological studies of the SFC on stratigraphically and geographically confined samples instead
                                                of on the entire temporal and geographic distribution of the SCF based on historical collections with limited
                                                provenance. The Santacrucian can be considered a model to the study of South American faunas after the arrival
                                                of hystricomorph rodents and anthropoid primates but before GABI.

1. Introduction                                                                  a renewed background and vision.
                                                                                     From a paleoecological perspective, in the last decade there have
    The continental early-middle Miocene (Burdigalian-early Langhian)            been two different approaches for the understanding of the biota and
fossil record of the Santa Cruz Formation (SCF) from Austral Patagonia,          environments of the SCF: either considering stratigraphically and
represents the biota that has most impacted historically and conceptu­           geographically restricted samples obtained through exhaustive field
ally the understanding of the Cenozoic biotic evolution of South America         work efforts (Kay et al., 2012; Vizcaíno et al., 2010) or globally along the
prior to the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI), when South                entire temporal and geographic distribution of the formation based on
America was mostly isolated from other Continents . Moreover, the SCF            bibliography and historical collections (Croft, 2013).
contains the best preserved high-latitude continental biotic record in the           The approach by Vizcaíno et al. (2010) and Kay et al. (2012) was
Southern Hemisphere providing further insights into mid-Miocene                  based on fossils collected from geographically and stratigraphically
temperature and precipitation. It is well known that floras and faunas           restricted sets of localities of the Atlantic Coast outcrops, which are often
dependent on warm, wet conditions expanded to higher latitudes in                in an excellent state of preservation, including partial or complete ar­
South America at that time (Frenguelli, 1953; Ortiz-Jaureguizar and              ticulated skeletons, offering a unique opportunity to perform paleobio­
Cladera, 2006; Pascual and Odreman Rivas, 1971; Pascual and                      logical studies based on a form-function approach (Vizcaíno et al.,
Ortiz-Jaureguizar, 1990). The analysis of Hinojosa (2005) of early and           2012d). For these authors, the fact that many taxa come from certain
middle Miocene floras at 33–34◦ S latitude between 21 and 13 Ma,                 levels deposited in a restricted time frame provides a narrow temporal
suggests an increase in mean annual temperatures (MATs) from the late            window that allows reliable paleoecological analysis (Kay et al., 2012;
Oligocene-early Miocene from 16–17 ◦ C to MATs exceeding 22 ◦ C.                 Perkins et al., 2012). Vizcaíno et al. (2010) used the relationship be­
Likewise, at the beginning of the Miocene, the floras indicate an even           tween population density and body size for estimating the on-crop
more abrupt rise in rainfall, which culminated in values exceeding 1000          biomass (in kg/km2) of the species of these paleocommunities and
mm. During the middle and late Miocene, rainfall subsided, reaching              calculated their metabolic requirements. Kay et al. (2012) reconstructed
minimum values of ~440 mm by around 10 Ma (Hinojosa, 2005). The                  the niche structure by identifying the number of species present, the
expanded faunal samples and precise dating of our early-middle                   body size, locomotion, and diet of the mammalian genera at the suite of
Miocene SCF localities (Trayler et al., 2020b) make them ideal candi­            localities FL 1–7 compared with similar kinds of data for extant faunas of
dates for evaluating Patagonian climate and biota nearly 20◦ farther             South America; using that data they interpreted the paleoclimate and
south that Hinojosa’s localities, practically at the southern end of the         paleoenvironment of FL 1–7. The FL 1–7 fauna was later studied by
continent.                                                                       Spradley et al. (2019) updating the approach of Kay et al. (2012) to
    Historically, the record from the Río Santa Cruz (RSC) represents the        derive paleoecological predictive models for the same Atlantic Coast
first systematic and exhaustive effort for collecting and studying verte­        fauna and the Miocene La Venta fauna of Colombia. Finally, Rodrí­
brate fossils from Patagonia, planned by Francisco P. Moreno and                 guez-Gómez et al. (2020) estimated the biomass of the primary and
executed by Carlos and Florentino Ameghino in 1887 (Brinkman and                 secondary consumers of the paleoecosystem to assess if the resources
Vizcaíno, 2014; Fernicola et al., 2014, 2019b; Vizcaíno et al., 2013). For       available would satisfy the nutritional requirements of all species of
the following three or four decades, the material and intellectual results       secondary consumers.
of this first and subsequent expeditions undertaken by Carlos and pub­               The results of the foundational work by Kay et al. (2012) were pre­
lished by Florentino stimulated important academic institutions of the           sented as the concluding chapter of a volume on the paleobiology of the
world to obtain their own collections of fossils from the SCF (Vizcaíno          Santacrucian biota recorded on the Atlantic Coast edited by some of the
et al., 2013, 2016, 2017b). Especially during that period, the Santa Cruz        authors of this contribution (Vizcaíno et al., 2012a). When considering
fossils became an inescapable reference for comparing other vertebrate           the future direction of their research program, Vizcaíno et al. (2012d)
continental faunas, either older or younger.                                     proposed to expand this approach to a more complete geographic and
    Conceptually, the Ameghino collections were crucial for under­               chronologic range of the SCF, recording the different assemblages at
standing and setting the succession of Cenozoic faunas from Patagonia            different levels and evaluating the ecological changes that occurred
(Ameghino, 1906) and constituted the basis for the establishment of the          during the time of deposition of the formation in different areas. The
Santacrucian South American Land Mammal Age (SALMA) (Pascual                     aforementioned update of the RSC stratigraphy and fossil record pro­
et al., 1965). With the addition of fossils from other SCF localities,           vides an invaluable opportunity to achieve that undertaking in the his­
especially those from the Atlantic coast outcrops, their abundance and           torically and scientifically most significant location of the SCF and its
quality makes them the best material for interpreting the taxonomic              fossil record.
richness and biological diversity of mammals in Patagonia after the                  The main goal of this contribution is to reconstruct the paleoecology
mid-Cenozoic arrival of primates and rodents, but before the arrival of          (paleoclimate and paleoenvironment) of two temporally-restricted and
North American immigrants as part of the Great American Biotic                   distinct, mostly non-overlapping fossil faunas recovered by us along the
Interchange (GABI) (Vizcaíno et al., 2012d). Recent intensive fieldwork          RSC compared with the temporally constrained and slightly older FL 1–7
has refined the stratigraphy and the vertebrate fossil record of the SCF         fauna of the Atlantic coast presented in Kay et al. (2012). We examine
from the right bank of the RSC compiled in a volume edited by Fernicola          whether the SCF fauna differed among three distinct temporal intervals
et al. (2019a). In that volume, Fernicola et al. (2019b) proposed that the       of the SCF spanning, from the oldest in the Atlantic coast FL 1–7, at
exposures along the RSC should be considered the type area for the SCF           about 17.4 Ma (Trayler et al., 2020b), to the youngest localities in the
and its fauna. The work constitutes a starting point for comparisons with        RSC Barrancas Blancas, between ~17.2 and ~16.3 Ma, and Segundas
other early and middle Miocene exposures and faunas in Patagonia with            Barrancas Blancas, between ~16.5 and ~15.6 Ma (Cuitiño et al., 2016,

                                                                             2
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                   Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

2019a).                                                                                    The SCF is superbly exposed along coastal cliffs and wave-cut plat­
                                                                                        forms south of Río Coyle, including sites such as Anfiteatro, Estancia La
2. Background                                                                           Costa, Cañadón Silva and Puesto Estancia La Costa (Fig. 1). In this area,
                                                                                        the SCF is lithologicaly similar to that of the RSC, including thicknesses
2.1. Geological setting                                                                 of a maximum of 100 m (Matheos and Raigemborn, 2012; Tauber,
                                                                                        1997a). Fossil levels (FL) 1 to 7 were defined in laterally continuous
    The SCF is an early to middle Miocene lithostratigraphic unit widely                package about 35 m thick of exposures in the Estancia La Costa Member,
distributed in the Austral Basin and mostly composed of fine-grained                    (Kay et al., 2012; Tauber, 1997a). The age of this composite level is
fluvial sediments, showing thickness variations from about 500 m                        based on the age of two radiometrically dated tuffs that bracket it: the
close to the Andean foothills to about 200 m at the Atlantic coast. In                  CO tuff of Perkins et al. (2012), and the CV-13 tuff of Trayler et al.
terms of stratigraphy and sedimentology, the best known localities are                  (2020b). The former as refined by high-precision U–Pb age modeling is
along the Atlantic coast between Río Coyle and Río Gallegos (Matheos                    17.31 Ma and the latter is 17.62 Ma (Trayler et al., 2020b).
and Raigemborn, 2012; Tauber, 1997a, 1997b; Trayler et al., 2020b;
Zapata, 2018), inland along Río Santa Cruz and Río Chalía (Cuitiño
et al., 2016, 2019a, 2021; Fernicola et al., 2014), and in the Andes south              2.2. Santacrucian fauna
of Lago Posadas (Cuitiño et al., 2019b) (Fig. 1). Age assignments for the
SCF in western (Andean) localities suggest a time of accumulation be­                       In addition to what was mentioned above, the fossils of the SCF are
tween 18.5 and 14 Ma (Blisniuk et al., 2005), whereas in the eastern part               the best record for interpreting the biological diversity of mammals in
of the basin this time span is restricted between 18 and 15 Ma (Cuitiño                the southern part of South America (Patagonia) prior to the GABI
et al., 2016, 2021; Perkins et al., 2012; Trayler et al., 2020b).                       (Vizcaíno et al., 2012d). As noted by Simpson (1980) this fauna is
    The SCF crops out in several localities along the escarpments of the                particularly important for understanding a phase in the history in which
east-west oriented valley of the RSC. Most of the best exposures are                    the communities of South American mammals consisted of a complex
located along the southern margin of this valley, from which recent                     mixture of descendants of ancient lineages of the continent (meta­
surveys provided novel sedimentologic, geochronologic and paleonto­                     therians, xenarthrans, astrapotheres, notoungulates and litopterns) and
logic data (Fernicola et al., 2019a). Following the original nomenclature               new immigrants (primates and rodents) from other land masses (prob­
of Carlos Ameghino, these localities are known from east to west as                     ably Africa) (Antoine et al., 2012; Arnal et al., 2020; Boivin et al., 2017;
Barrancas Blancas (BB), Segundas Barrancas Blancas (SBB) and Yatén                     Bond et al., 2015; Kay, 2015a, 2015b; Lavocat, 1976; Seiffert et al.,
Huageno (YH) (Fernicola et al., 2014). In BB the SCF lies transitionally                2020). Fossil mammals include small paucituberculatans and caenoles­
above the early Miocene shallow marine deposits of the Monte León                      tids, medium to large carnivorous sparassodonts (Metatheria), several
Formation, while its base is covered in western localities. In turn, the                armadillos, some medium-sized glyptodonts, a large diversity of me­
SCF is overlaid everywhere by fluvial terrace conglomerates of late                     dium to large-bodied sloths, and one small anteater (Xenarthra), a large
Miocene-Pliocene age showing a sharp, regionally extensive erosional                    astrapothere (Astrapotheria), several small typotheres, two medium to
surface.                                                                                large toxodontids, a large homalodothere (Notoungulata), some pro­
    In the RSC valley, the SCF is mostly composed of partly pedogenized                 terotheriids and a medium-sized macraucheniid (Litopterna), as well as
fine-grained fluvial deposits accumulated on fluvial floodplains. Sparse                many caviomorph rodents (Rodentia), and a medium-sized platyrrhine
lenticular sandstones represent accumulation within fluvial channels.                   monkey (Primates).
Tabular, fine-grained tuff and tuffaceous horizons are also common                          There is also a rich assemblage of birds (Rheiformes, Tinamiformes,
(Fig. 2). Zircon U–Pb ages from these tuffs, in combination to calculation              Gruiformes, Anseriformes, Pelecaniformes, Ciconiiformes, Falconi­
of sedimentation rates, constrain the time span of the SCF to between                   formes, and Cariamiformes) (Degrange et al., 2012; Diederle and Nor­
~17.2 and ~16.3 Ma for Barrancas Blancas, and between ~16.5 and                         iega, 2019). Unaccountably, no crocodilians and turtles are recorded,
~15.6 Ma for Segundas Barrancas Blancas (Cuitiño et al., 2016, 2019a).                 but among the herpetofauna there are anurans and several squamates,
                                                                                        including a tupinambine teiid and some iguanians and colubrids (Albino

Fig. 1. Map of the southern region of Santa Cruz Province showing the distribution of the Santa Cruz Formation (in yellow) and the localities studied. On the Atlantic
coast, FL 1–7 refers to the penecontemporaneus localities Anfiteatro (1), Estancia La Costa (2), Cañadón Silva (3), and Puesto Estancia La Costa (4) (Kay et al., 2012).
In the Río Santa Cruz, Barrancas Blancas (BB), Segundas Barrancas Blancas (SBB) and Yatén Huageno (YH). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure
legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)

                                                                                    3
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                    Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

                                                                                              Regarding the fossil mammals recently collected in the RSC, Ferni­
                                                                                          cola et al. (2019c) reported 1828 specimens from the three localities
                                                                                          (540 specimens in Barrancas Blancas, 1267 in Segundas Barrancas
                                                                                          Blancas, and 21 in Yatén Huageno), comprising 64 species: 10 species of
                                                                                          metatherians (four Sparassodonta, five Paucituberculata, and one
                                                                                          Microbiotheria), 12 species of xenarthrans (five Folivora and seven
                                                                                          Cingulata), one astrapothere, nine notoungulates (three Toxodontia and
                                                                                          six Typotheria), seven litopterns (six Proterotheriidae and one
                                                                                          Macraucheniidae), 24 rodents (11 Octodontoidea, two Erethizontoidea,
                                                                                          five Cavioidea, and six Chinchilloidea), and one new species of primate
                                                                                          (Homunculidae) (Fig. 3). Combining the list of species of the new
                                                                                          collection with other species previously reported for the RSC and
                                                                                          recognized by the specialists in Fernicola et al. (2019a) the taxonomic
                                                                                          richness rises to 95 taxa (16 species of metatherians, 22 xenarthrans, two
                                                                                          astrapotheres, 16 notoungulates, 7 litopterns, 31 rodents, and one pri­
                                                                                          mate (see Appendix 2 in Fernicola et al., 2019c). Following the work of
                                                                                          Fernández (2020), in gthe present contribution we identify three species
                                                                                          not reported by Fernicola et al. (2019c): the typotheres Protypotherium
                                                                                          compressidens Ameghino (1891), Interatherium rodens Ameghino (1887)
                                                                                          and I. extensus Ameghino, 1895.

                                                                                          3. Materials and methods

                                                                                          3.1. Selection of samples, localities, and levels

                                                                                              Fossil faunas. The study presented here is based on fossil vertebrate
                                                                                          collections recovered during fieldwork by the authors and their team
                                                                                          during 2013 and 2014 in the RSC at BB, and SBB. The RSC collection
                                                                                          includes more than 1900 specimens that are cataloged in the permanent
                                                                                          collections of the Museo Regional Provincial Padre M.J. Molina (MPM-
                                                                                          PV), Río Gallegos, Santa Cruz Province, Argentina. In the results section
                                                                                          we tabulate the number of specimens broken down by taxon. Most of
                                                                                          these specimens were reported in the volume edited by Fernicola et al.
                                                                                          (2019a). As in Kay et al. (2012), we based our analysis solely on the
                                                                                          collection made by us (i.e. not considering the old collections of un­
                                                                                          certain provenance and stratigraphic level).
                                                                                              Additional faunal comparisons are based on specimen records from
                                                                                          our collecting expeditions in the SCF at FL 1–7 in Vizcaíno et al. (2012a).
                                                                                          The FL 1–7 fauna is a composite of specimens collected at pene­
                                                                                          contemporaneous localities (Anfiteatro, Estancia La Costa, Cañadón
                                                                                          Silva, Puesto Estancia La Costa; Fig. 1) from the Estancia La Costa
                                                                                          Member of the SCF on the Atlantic coast south of Río Coyle, between 51◦
                                                                                          03′ and 51◦ 11’ S (Vizcaíno et al., 2012d). The fossil species lists are
                                                                                          updated from those reported by Vizcaíno et al. (2012a) and Kay et al.
                                                                                          (2012) based on systematic revisions and fieldwork work undertaken
                                                                                          since the collecting season of 2011.
                                                                                              Each fauna samples a different non-overlapping age range: FL 1–7 is
                                                                                          younger than a tuff designated CV-13 dated at 17.62 Ma and older than
                                                                                          the CO tuff (17.31 Ma) (Trayler et al., 2020b); BB is dated at between 17
Fig. 2. Age-correlated sedimentary sections of the Santa Cruz Formation at
                                                                                          Ma and 16.5 Ma, and SBB between 16.3 Ma and 15.6 Ma. A brief interval
Barrancas Blancas and Segundas Barrancas Blancas localities at the Río Santa
Cruz. Each section represents the integration from several closely-spaced partial         of temporal overlap between BB and SBB contains no fossils (Fig. 2).
sections reported by (Cuitiño et al., 2019a). Zircon U–Pb ages from tuffs are                For each fauna we present taxonomic identifications (genera and
indicated in red; all other ages are estimated upon sedimentation rates (Cuitiño         species presence or absence), and the stratigraphic ranges at BB and SBB
et al., 2016, 2019a). (For interpretation of the references to color in this figure       (Supplementary document S1). Stratigraphic ranges are adjusted by
legend, the reader is referred to the Web version of this article.)                       correlation based on reported radiometric ages, supplemented by
                                                                                          depositional rates.
et al., 2017; Fernicola and Albino, 2012; Muzzopappa, 2019).                                  Our reports of absolute and relative abundance are based on spec­
    The 1887 expedition of Carlos Ameghino to the RSC produced more                       imen records in the MPM-PV collection catalogs. Species abundances are
than 2000 fossil specimens, on the basis of which his brother Florentino                  roughly comparable between most components of the fauna (meta­
erected 110 new species of mammals (Ameghino, 1887), dramatically                         therians, notoungulates, primates, litopterns) because the identifiable
increasing the number of Santacrucian taxa from the 12 described                          parts are mainly dentitions, but xenarthran records are not comparable
earlier (see references in Fernicola et al., 2019b). Between 1887 and                     because they are based on other anatomical parts. This is especially the
1894, approximately 500 added taxa from the SCF were proposed by                          case for armored taxa for which the identification is based on dermal
Ameghino and Mercerat, of which about 120 type specimens came from                        scutes.
the RSC (Fernicola et al., 2019b).                                                            Extant Faunas. For the analysis of extant mammalian faunas, we used
                                                                                          a subset of 55 of the 85 faunas enumerated by Spradley et al. (2019)

                                                                                      4
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                               Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

Fig. 3. Exposures of the SCF at the Río Santa Cruz. A view of the river and exposures. B, Barrancas Blancas, and C, Segundas Barrancas Blancas. Life reconstructions
of some of the genera recorded at the Río Santa Cruz. Taxa >5 kg are approximately scaled and those < 5 kg (Abderites, Palaeothentes, Pachyrukhos and Homunculus)
are not. Modified from Chapters 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 of Vizcaíno et al. (2012a,b,c,d).

from localities with restricted geographic areas across South America                tropics and high latitudes (Ojeda and Mares, 1989; Patterson et al.,
(Fig. 4). We consider only the faunas of low elevation because the SCF’s             1998).
depositional environment indicates a lowland with little topographic                     The list of extant localities in Appendix A provides some of the
relief (Cuitiño et al., 2019a; Raigemborn et al., 2015, 2018a) and                  accompanying information about elevation above sea level, mean
because faunal composition is affected by altitude. Our upper-limit                  annual precipitation (MAP), mean annual temperature (MAT), as well as
cutoff is based conservatively on data for elevational gradients of                  summaries of niche metrics for modern and Santacrucian localities (see
vegetation, which are particularly significant above our cutoff elevation,           below). Other data, including precipitation and temperature season­
although the elevation at which the changes occur differs between the                ality, canopy height, and net primary productivity are provided in

                                                                                 5
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                          Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

                                                                                                                  Fig. 4. The South American continent with
                                                                                                                  the position of the localities evaluated. Black
                                                                                                                  dots are extant faunas listed in Appendix A.
                                                                                                                  Three overlapping red stars are the Miocene
                                                                                                                  localities of the Santa Cruz Formation. The
                                                                                                                  four panels represent the mean annual tem­
                                                                                                                  perature (◦ C), temperature seasonality (◦ C),
                                                                                                                  mean annual precipitation (mm), and pre­
                                                                                                                  cipitation seasonality (Coefficient of Varia­
                                                                                                                  tion of monthly rainfall). Data from NOAA
                                                                                                                  Physical Sciences Laboratory (PSL) (https://
                                                                                                                  psl.noaa.gov/data/gridded/data.UDel_Air
                                                                                                                  T_Precip.html). (For interpretation of the
                                                                                                                  references to color in this figure legend, the
                                                                                                                  reader is referred to the Web version of this
                                                                                                                  article.)

Supplementary document S2. The full list of 208 genera of extant non-            Global Land Analysis and Discovery group of the University of Maryland
volant mammalian genera is found in Supplementary document S3. A                 (https://glad.umd.edu/dataset/gedi). Spatial maps of 30 arc-seconds
few updates were made to Spradley et al.’s faunal lists and based on             resolution for MAP, MAT, and temperature seasonality and a resolu­
other highly corroborated and complete lists in the literature (see notes        tion of 30 arc-minutes for canopy height were then uploaded into QGIS®
in SD S1). The most significant difference between the lists reported here       (QGIS.org, 2021). In order to extract the data for each locality. The
and those in Spradley et al. (2019) is that we count genera, not species         sampling areas of the extant faunas represent a wide range of mean
(see Section 3.2). While it is likely that a few taxa go unrecorded in           annual rainfall and the faunas range in latitude from 10◦ N to 55◦ S. Both
Spradley’s list and ours, this procedure provides a more reliable repre­         floral diversity and the complexity of vegetation in the lowland tropics is
sentation of any given fauna at a locality than does the use of distribu­        strongly correlated with annual rainfall (Gentry, 1988). At one extreme,
tion maps (Spradley et al., 2015).                                               at Río Caura, Estado Bolívar, Venezuela, rainfall exceeds 3.5 m per year
    MAP, MAT, and temperature seasonality data for all localities were           with no appreciable dry season. At the other extreme at Parque Nacional
obtained through the online database WorldClim.org (https://www.wor              Bosques Petrificados de Jaramillo, Santa Cruz Province, Patagonia,
ldclim.org/data/bioclim.html) as high-resolution spatial data. MAP is            Argentina, with rainfall ~200 mm per annum and dry the year around.
defined as the sum annual precipitation in millimeters averaged over the         Mean annual temperature for the extant ranges from ~28 ◦ C at Puerto
course of a thirty-year span (1970–2000) (O’Donnell and Ignizio, 2012).          Páez, Estado Apure, Venezuela to ~4 ◦ C at Parque Nacional Tierra del
MAT is defined as the annual mean temperature in degrees Celsius as              Fuego, Provincia de Tierra del Fuego, Argentina. In environments where
calculated from the mean monthly temperatures for a given year.                  rainfall exceeds 2000 mm/year and a dry season lasts fewer than 4
Temperature seasonality is defined by O’Donnell and Ignizio (2012) as            months, evergreen rainforest predominates. In regions with less than
“the amount of temperature variation over a given year (or averaged              1000 mm of rainfall and dry intervals longer than 6 months, the domi­
years) based on the standard deviation (variation) of monthly temper­            nant vegetation is drought-resistant and deciduous. Areas of interme­
ature averages”, and is also measured in degrees Celsius. Precipitation          diate rainfall between 1000 and 2000 mm/year with 4–6 months of dry
seasonality (expressed as a percentage) is the coefficient of variation of       season tend to exhibit semideciduous forests, often as riparian gallery
the monthly total precipitation to the mean monthly total precipitation.         forests with interspersed savannas.
    Spatial data for canopy height (in meters) were downloaded from the

                                                                             6
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                   Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

3.1.1. Use of genus as the level of interest                                               Basic ecological information for each extant genus was compiled
    Kay et al. (2012) analyzed the SCF fauna at the generic level whereas              from the literature (Supplemental Document S3). These include cate­
Spradley et al. (2019) used species rather than genera as the unit of                  gorical variables for average body mass, primary diet, and preferred
comparison. We have transformed Spradley’s dataset into one that uses                  locomotion, which, in combination, permit a general evaluation of the
genera. In choosing the generic level for our analysis, we recognize that              role of the genus in niche space (Vermillion et al., 2018), as described in
we may be sacrificing sensitivity in detecting differences in community                Table 1. The niche structure of the fossil mammalian genera from FL
structure but this choice is made for several reasons. First is the problem            1–7, BB, and SBB given in Appendix B, is based upon ecomorphological
of detection bias. The likelihood of recovering a high percentage of the               reconstructions presented in Vizcaíno et al. (2012a) with updates
species present in a fossil community must be far lower than that for the              (Álvarez and Arnal, 2015; Álvarez and Pérez, 2019; Arnal and Vucetich,
recovery of most of its genera.                                                        2015b; Cassini, 2013; Muñoz et al., 2019; Toledo, 2016; Toledo et al.,
    Second, the recognition of fossil species is much more problematic                 2014).
than the recognition of genera. Hapalops Ameghino, 1887 is a classic                       To evaluate the community structure of the extant faunas, we use
example (Bargo et al., 2019; Kay et al., 2012). Ameghino (1887, 1891,                  total generic richness or total herbivore richness, and the indices devised
1894) named a vast number of species. Scott (1903–1904) recognized 22                  by Kay and Madden (1997a; 1997b) to express the number of genera
species of Ameghino’s as likely valid and listed another 15 for which he               within a guild (that is, with a particular niche specialization or within a
“could arrive at no definite conclusion (page 258)”. Bargo et al. (2019)               body size range) relative to total number of genera.
would further reduce the number of Hapalops species at BB and SBB to
one, with certainty, and an uncertain number of others for which there is              1. Frugivore Index expresses the proportion of frugivorous and seed-
insufficient information. Such uncertainly would render any effort to                     eating species to the total number of plant-eating species in the
reconstruct paleoecology based on species numbers problematic                             fauna:
whereas the number of genera is more stable.
    Third, morphologically-defined genera sensu Mayr (1950) 1 have                     100*(F(I) + S + F(L))/(F(I) + S + F(L) + L + G + Sc (Tu) + Sc(L))
been used with success as the primary analytical units for a wide range
of large-scale paleontological analyses in paleoecology. The justification             2. Browsing Index expresses the proportion of browsing or leaf-eating
is that analyses of genus-level operational units generally capture                       (i.e., shrub and tree leaves and forbs) species to the total number of
species-level patterns (Jablonski and Finarelli, 2009). The genus taxon                   grazing and browsing species in the fauna:
also was preferred by for an analysis on the evolution of body size in                 100*(L)/ (L + G)
Cenozoic mammalian herbivores from South America “because they are
discrete taxonomic units accepted by most paleontologists, and they are
less affected by the problems of evaluating intraspecific variation in
fossils” (pg. 82 in Vizcaíno et al., 2012b).                                           Table 1
                                                                                       Definitions of the ecological categories used in this study. Each genus is assigned
3.1.2. Should we limit the analysis to taxa greater than 500 g?                        a number from each variable. Locomotion/substrate preference (six categories)
                                                                                       following Fleming (1973) and Andrews et al. (1979).
    Often, comparison among faunas for the purpose of assessing
paleoecology, paleoclimate or the driving factors of mammalian biodi­                   Body         Definition   Locomotor      Definition     Dietary      Definition
versity restrict their comparisons to species that exceed 500 g in body                 Mass                      Category                      Category
                                                                                        Category
size because data for smaller taxa are sensitive to detection bias (Reed,
1998; Robinson et al., 2017; Rowan et al., 2016, 2020). We include these                1 (I)        10–100 g     1: LT          large          1: Vert      vertebrate
                                                                                                                                 terrestrial                 prey
smaller taxa for two reasons: as already noted, using genera rather than
                                                                                                                                 (>1 kg)
species should compensate for detection bias. Second, at least in the                   2 (II        100 g-1      2: ST          small          2: Sc(I)     scavenging
Neotropics, species (and generic) richness of small mammal taxa (pri­                                kg                          terrestrial                 and insects
mates, small rodents, metatherians) varies from place to place whereas                                                           (500 kg      6: T(F)        fossorial      6: I(F)      insects (with
                                                                                                                                 (including                  some fruit or
   For reconstructing the niche structure of all faunas, we identify the                                                         semi-                       nectar)
number of genera present at the modern localities and fossil sites, the                                                          fossorial)
body size, substrate preference and use, and diet of the taxa, as deter­                                                                        7: F(I)      fruit (or
                                                                                                                                                             gum), with
mined by behavioral studies of the living genera and as inferred from                                                                                        some animal
ecomorphology in the case of the fossil genera.                                                                                                              protein
                                                                                                                                                8: S         small seeds
                                                                                                                                                             of grasses
  1                                                                                                                                                          (and other
    Morphologically-defined genera (morphogenera) are defined by Mayr
                                                                                                                                                             plants or
(1950) as: “… one [or several] species of common ancestry, which differ in a                                                                                 insects)
pronounced manner from other groups of species and are separated from them                                                                      9: F(L)      fruit with
by a decided morphological gap,” Genera are considered by Mayr to occupy                                                                                     leaves
adaptive plateaus “based on a more fundamental difference in ecology than that                                                                  10: L        leaves
between the ecological niches of species.” To this is sometimes added the caveat                                                                             (browse)
that paraphyletic taxa are inadmissible (Wood and Collard, 1999). In any event,                                                                 11: G        stems and
as noted by Jablonski and Finarelli (2009), a significant percentage of mor­                                                                                 leaves of
                                                                                                                                                             grasses
phogenera are monophyletic (Jablonski and Finarelli 2009) and species and
                                                                                                                                                             (graze)
genus-level diversification dynamics are comparable (Liow and Finarelli, 2014).

                                                                                   7
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                         Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

3. Arboreality Index is used to express the proportion of arboreal              The Simpson Coefficient of faunal similarity is 76.3% between FL 1–7
   species to the total number of non-volant species:                           and BB, 81.6% between FL 1–7 and SBB, and 92.1% between BB and
                                                                                SBB.
100*(A + 0.5*A(T)/ (sum of all locomotor categories)
                                                                                   To interpret the comparison of SI between the fossil localities, we
                                                                                examined a cluster of seven extant localities: Reserva de la Biosfera y
4. Predator/prey ratio expresses the proportion of secondary
                                                                                Estación Biológica del Beni, Bolivia, Parque Nacional Madidi, Bolivia,
   consumers                                                                    Parque Nacional Noel Kempff Mercado, Bolivia, Estación Biológica
                                                                                Cocha Cashu, Peru, Reserva Nacional Tambopata, Peru, Parque Nacio­
100*((Vert + Sc(I) + Sc(Tu) + Sc(L) + MYR + I(F))/all herbivores                nal del Manú, Peru, Otishi National Park, Peru, and Manaus, Brazil
                                                                                (Appendix A). These localities are at low elevation (less than 600 masl),
5. Size Index: expresses the proportion of species in size classes II and       between 2.5◦ and 14.6◦ S, separate by an average of 184 km, and have an
   III relative to those in class IV an V where the size classes are II =       average rainfall of 2142 ± 561 mm. There are 28 pairwise comparisons
   100–1000 g; III = 1–10 kg; IV = 10–500 kg; V = >500 Kg:                      possible among these localities. They have an average Simpson’s Index
                                                                                of 67% with a range of 34%–90%. There is significant correlation be­
100*(Class II + Class III)/ Class IV + Class V                                  tween SI and distance between the localities in this sample (R2 = 0.70, P
                                                                                < 0.0001). On the other hand, SI and rainfall are not correlated signif­
    In comparing the rodents of the three fossil faunas we present a
                                                                                icantly between the localities (R2 = 0.010, P = 0.62). The SI values of the
discrete variable for cheek-tooth crown height (hypsodonty). Hyp­
                                                                                three SCF localities, separated by a maximum of 125 km, fall within the
sodonty is based on the relationship between the height of the crown and
                                                                                range expected for such a distance. In other words, in terms of faunal
the anteroposterior length of the crown of the lower molars (Janis and
                                                                                similarity, the three SCF faunas, despite their temporal separation, do
Fortelius, 1988). Arnal (2011) evaluated the grade of hypsodonty as
                                                                                not differ more than would be expected for localities with similar
follows: brachydont: ratio of mesiodistal length/crown height < 0.5;
                                                                                geographic distance of separation.
mesodont: ratio < 1.0; protohypsodont ratio >1.0 but forming a root;
euhypsodont (rootless crown). From this we derive a hypsodonty score
                                                                                4.1.1. Meridiolestida
(HS), HS is the percentage of specimens of each crown height weighted
                                                                                   The early Miocene meridiolestidan Necrolestes (Rougier et al., 2012;
by crown height with euhypsodont taxa counting for 3: protohypsodont,
                                                                                Wible and Rougier, 2017) has been recorded in the SCF, but it is un­
2: mesodont, 1: and brachydont, 0. The total score is divided by the
                                                                                common. All remains come from coastal SCF. The type specimen is from
maximum possible score if all taxa were euhypsodont, i.e., 300, and is
                                                                                Monte Observación (Ameghino, 1891) and the specimens from Prince­
expressed as a percentage. If all specimens are euhypsodont, the score is
                                                                                ton University/Yale Peabody Museum Collection (YPM-VPPU; JB
100%; if all are brachydont the weighted score is 0%.
                                                                                Hatcher’s old collections) are from south of Río Coyle along the Atlantic
    The Simpson Coefficient of faunal similarity (SI) (Simpson, 1943) is
                                                                                coast and Killik Aike Norte on the Río Gallegos. We have recovered three
used to compare some of the faunas. SI is 100*(C/N1) where C is the
                                                                                specimens of Necrolestes (cranial and mandibular remains) in FL 1–7,
number of taxa in common between two faunas and N1 is the total
                                                                                one in Cañadón de las Vacas and one in Rincón del Buque (Fig. 1), but
number of taxa in the smaller sample.
                                                                                have not recorded it so far in the RSC localities.
                                                                                   Necrolestes has anatomical specializations found in extant subterra­
3.3. Statistical analyses                                                       nean mammals. Recent studies proposed that it was as a head-lift digger,
                                                                                by analogy with extant African golden moles and Australian marsupial
    Least-squares regressions using linear and second degree polynomial         moles; analysis of the ear region supports the inference that it was
models and Principal Components analysis (using a correlation matrix)           adapted for subterranean habits (Wible and Rougier, 2017).
were carried out with JMP® Pro 15.0.0 for Mac.
    We also estimated environmental parameters using two machine-               4.1.2. Metatheria
learning models, random forest (RF) and Gaussian process regression                 Metatherians (Sparassodonta and Paucituberculata) are relatively
(GPR), previously used in paleoenvironmental reconstruction by                  infrequent elements of the SCF. We identified 95 metatherian specimens
Spradley et al. (2019). These machine-learning models take advantage            in our collections from FL 1–7, BB, and SBB: 43, 15, and 37, respectively.
of the same multivariate approach as a linear regression, while also            At FL 1–7, 11 genera and 14 species are recorded; at BB, there are 5
incorporating relationships between geographically closely related data         genera and 7 species and; at SBB, 8 genera and 10 species (Table 2).
points in order to model even non-linear relationships between variables            There seems to be a taphonomic bias in the collections made at the
(see Spradley et al., 2019 for further explanation of RF and GPR and            different localities. Sparassodonts (45 records) are clearly more abun­
their utility in paleoenvironmental reconstruction). The models were            dant in FL 1–7 (where more complete and articulated specimens appear)
derived from the ecological indices discussed above, and were used to           than in the RSC localities: 31 in FL 1–7, 4 in BB, and 10 in SBB. We
estimate mean annual precipitation (MAP), mean annual temperature               recorded 8 genera and 8 species in FL 1–7, 2 genera and species in BB
(MAT), temperature seasonality, and canopy height at FL 1–7, BB, and            and 4 genera and species in SBB. Borhyaena and Sypalocion are present in
SBB. As demonstrated in Spradley et al. (2019), these machine learning          the three localities; Cladosictis and Perathereutes appear in the coast and
models have the ability to effectively estimate temperature seasonality         SBB, and Prothylacynus, Lycopsis and Acrocyon are recorded only in FL
and canopy height, in addition to MAP and MAT, in an extant                     1–7. However in the old collections of RSC, there are records of Acyon,
species-level dataset from Australia as well as South America. Error es­        Acrocyon, and Lycopsis (Fernicola et al., 2019c). This highlights the need
timates are presented as mean absolute error (MAE).                             to use caution when evaluating predator-prey ratios in these faunas.
                                                                                Sparassodonts were part of the predator guild, being mainly hyper­
4. Results                                                                      carnivores. They exhibited different locomotor abilities (from scansorial
                                                                                to terrestrial) and a wide range of body masses, from 1 kg to ~40 kg).
4.1. Review of mammalian occurrences                                            Prevosti et al. (2012) reconstructed the Santacrucian predator guild and
                                                                                suggested that there was a good niche partition within these
   Our sample of fossil mammals includes 44 genera from FL 1–7, 38              sparassodonts.
genera from BB, and 44 genera from SBB (Appendix B). These faunas are               Paucituberculatans (50 records) are more abundant in the RSC,
very similar to one another at the generic level. FL 1–7 and BB share 29        particularly in SBB (12 in FL 1–7; 11 in BB; 27 in SBB), where fossils are
genera; FL 1–7 and BB share 31 genera and BB and SBB share 35 genera.           more fragmentary and more small remains are found. At FL 1–7 we

                                                                            8
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                          Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

Table 2
Occurrence and frequency of metatherian specimens at FL 1–7, Barrancas Blancas, and Segundas Barrancas Blancas.
  Taxon                                                 FL 1-7                                 Barrancas Blancas (BB)                       Segundas Barrancas Blancas (SBB)
                                                                          a                b                         a                b
  Higher level classification   Genus                   P/A      N sp◦
                                                                         N     Freq. (%)       P/A     N sp.
                                                                                                           ◦
                                                                                                                 N           Freq. (%)      P/A     N◦ sp.     Na     Freq. (%)b

  SPARASSODONTA
  Hathliacynidae                Cladosictis             1        1       8     28.6            0                 0           0.0            1       1          4      40.0
                                Sipalocyon              1        1       4     14.3            1       1         3           75.0           1       1          2      20.0
                                Perathereutes           1        1       1     3.6             0                 0           0.0            1       1          1      10.0
                                Prothylacynus           1        1       2     7.1             0                 0           0.0            0                  0      0.0
                                Hathliacynidae indet.                    5     17.9                              0           0.0                               0      0.0
  Borhyaenidae                  Borhyaena               1        1       8     28.6            1       1         1           25.0           1       1          1      10.0
                                Lycopsis                1        1       1     3.6             0       0         0           0.0            0       0          0      0.0
                                Arctodictis             1        1       1     3.6             0                 0           0.0            0                  0      0.0
                                Acrocyon                1        1       1     3.6             0                 0           0.0            0                  0      0.0
                                Borhyaenidae indet.                      0     0.0                               0           0.0                               2      20.0
                                Summary                 8        8       31                    2       2         4                          4       4          10

  PAUCITUBERCULATA
  Palaeothentiidae              Palaeothentes           1        4       10    90.9            1       3         9           81.8           1       3          22     81.5
                                Acdestis                1        1       1     9.1             1       1         1           9.1            1       1          2      7.4
  Microbiotheriidae             Microbiotherium         1        1       1                     0                 0           0.0            1       1          2      7.4
  Abderitidae                   Abderites               0                0     0.0             1       1         1           9.1            1       1          1      3.7
                                Summary                 3        6       12                    3       5         11                         4       6          27

                                SUMMARY ALL TAXA        11       14      43                    5       7         15                         8       10         37
  a
      number of catalog entries.
  b
      Frequency of occurrence (number of subordinal records) divided by the total records at this locality. P/A, presence/absence; Freq., frequency.

recorded 3 genera and 6 species, 3 genera and 5 species in BB, and 4                      features in the specimens we collected (Fernicola and Vizcaíno, 2019).
genera and 6 species in SBB (Table 2).                                                    Santacrucian glyptodonts are moderately large (up to 120 kg) and
    Palaeothentes is, by far, the most abundantly recorded everywhere.                    ambulatory selective feeders in relatively closed to strictly closed hab­
Palaeothentes recorded at RSC are medium to large-sized curso-saltato­                    itats (Vizcaíno et al., 2011, 2012c).
rial insectivorous species ranging from ~80 g to 900 g; (Abello et al.,                       The armadillos Proeutatus and Prozaedyus are the most abundant and
2012); the larger, more frugivorous Palaeothentes aratae (Strait et al.,                  frequent cingulates at all localities, while Stenotatus is more frequent/
1990) was not identified at the RSC. The medium-sized insectivore-­                       abundant in the Río Santa Cruz. Peltephilines are more common in the
frugivore Acdestis oweni and the frugivorous/scansorial Abderites mer­                    coastal localities than in the RSC, but they are less frequent than the
idionalis were both recorded at BB and SBB (Chornogubsky et al., 2019).                   other three taxa. We did not record Stegotherium at FL 1–7, and in the
We have no records of Stilotherium, which is found in the old collections                 RSC we found only three osteoderms at BB, suggesting that it was quite
at RSC (Fernicola et al., 2019c). Stilotherium likely had an insectivorous                rare. All Santacrucian armadillos were diggers and the variation of the
diet based on the morphology of its cheek teeth illustrated by Abello                     masticatory apparatus shows a broad range of specializations from
et al. (2021).                                                                            herbivory and strict myrmecophagy. The taxonomic richness and di­
                                                                                          versity of armadillos supports the environmental interpretation of a
4.1.3. Xenarthra                                                                          mixture of open and relatively closed vegetation in relatively dry con­
    Among xenarthrans, Cingulata and Folivora are disparately repre­                      ditions (Vizcaíno et al., 2012c).
sented among the moderate to large mammals of the SCF. We recorded                            Folivora (sloths) are also abundant elements of the SCF. However, as
550 specimens of xenarthrans in our collections (129 in FL 1–7, 191 in                    with cingulates, skeletal remains such as skull and mandibles are rare
BB, and 230 in SBB; Table 3). At FL1-7 we recorded 13 genera and 15                       and postcranial elements are particularly abundant, which makes
species, 9 genera and 9 species at BB, and 10 genera and 10 species at                    taxonomic allocations difficult (Bargo et al., 2019). We recorded 123
SBB.                                                                                      specimens of sloths (57 in FL 1–7, 20 in BB and 46 in SBB). At FL 1–7 we
    Cingulates (armadillos and glyptodonts) remains are probably the                      recorded 6 genera and 8 species, one genus and species in BB and 5
most frequently found in the field, due to the more than 1000 osteo­                      genera and species in SBB. The most common sloth remains are un­
derms that constitute an individual carapace. Other skeletal remains are                  identifiable postcranial elements of Megatherioidea indet. (FL1-7: 53%,
uncommon, especially skulls, mandibles, and teeth. Particularly for the                   BB: 80% and SBB: 67%, Table 3). Hapalops is the only genus recorded in
glyptodonts, precise specific or even generic allocation of osteoderms                    the three localities, with the highest abundance, and Schismotherium and
may depend on the association with cranial remains (Fernicola and                         Nematherium are recorded on the coast and at SBB. While Pelecyodon,
Vizcaíno, 2019). Beyond those specimens with carapace associated with                     Hyperleptus and Eucholoeops record only in the coast, Xyophorus records
endoskeleton, our collecting strategy for cingulates was to collect a few                 are only in the RSC (SBB). Remarkably, we recorded megatheriids only
osteoderms from each locality and level to document taxon pre­                            in the highest levels of the RSC (at SBB), but they are not recorded so far
sence/absence. We recorded 426 specimens or lots of osteoderms: 121                       BB or FL1-7. The Planopinae indet at Segundas Barrancas Blancas is
glyptodonts (13 in FL 1–7, 48 in BB and 60 in SBB), and 305 armadillos                    either Planops or Prepotherium, see Bargo et al. (2012). Planopinae are
(58 in FL 1–7, 123 in BB, and 124 in SBB). At FL 1–7 and BB two genera                    the largest of the Santacrucian sloths (100–120 kg (Toledo et al.,
and species of glyptodonts were recorded, while in SBB only one.                          2014);). Megatherioid sloths have body masses from ~40 to 80 kg, while
Armadillos are represented by four genera and species at FL 1–7, 5 in BB,                 mylodontids reached ~80–90 kg. According to Toledo (2016) the
and 4 in SBB (Table 3).                                                                   mid-sized sloths (Hapalops, Pelecyodon, Schismotherium, Hyperleptus and
    Glyptodonts (Propalaehoplophoridae) are very common components                        Eucholoeops) are members of the arboreal folivore paleoguild. The
of the SCF.                                                                               mylodontid Nematherium may have been semiarboreal consumers of
    Cochlops and Eucinepeltus are recorded in the three localities. The                   leaves, fruits and tubers due to their digging capabilities, while
absence of Propalaehoplophorus in our collections but present in the old                  megatheriids were the most terrestrial sloths, and folivores.
collections at RSC may be an artifact due to the lack of diagnostic                           Vermilingua (anteaters) are poorly represented in the SCF (Bargo

                                                                                      9
Journal of South American Earth Sciences - Duke University
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                                                  Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

Table 3
Occurrence and frequency of xenarthran specimens at FL 1–7, Barrancas Blancas, and Segundas Barrancas Blancas.
  Taxon                                                            FL 1-7                                             Barrancas Blancas (BB)                         Segundas Barrancas Blancas (SBB)
                                                                                              a                b                             a                   b
  Higher level classification   Genus                              P/A      N sp.
                                                                                ◦
                                                                                          N          Freq. (%)        P/A        N sp.
                                                                                                                                     ◦
                                                                                                                                         N           Freq. (%)       P/A   N◦ sp.       Na        Freq. (%)b

  CINGULATA
  Propalaehoplophoridae         Cochlops                           1        1             2          15.4             1          1       12          25.0            0     0            0         0.0
                                Eucinepeltus                       0        0             0          0.0              1          1       2           4.2             1     1            11        18.3
                                Propalaehoplophorus                1        1             4          30.8             0          0       0           0.0             0     0            0         0.0
                                Propalaehoplophori- dae indet.                            7          53.8                                34          70.8                               49        81.7
                                Summary                            2        2             13                          2          2       48                          1     1            60

  Peltephilidae                 Peltephilus                        1        1             12         20.7             1          1       7           5.7             1     1            7         5.6
  Dasypodidae                   Proeutatus                         1        1             26         44.8             1          1       42          34.1            1     1            43        34.7
                                Stenotatus                         1        1             2          3.4              1          1       26          21.1            1     1            22        17.7
                                Prozaedyus                         1        1             15         25.9             1          1       47          38.2            1     1            52        41.9
                                Stegotherium                       0        0             0          0.0              1          1       1           0.8             0     0            0         0.0
  Dasypodidae indet                                                                       3          5.2                                             0.0                                          0.0
                                Summary                            4        4             58                          5          5       123                         4     4            124

  VERMILINGUA
  Myrmecophagidae               Protamandua                        1        1             1          100.0
                                Summary                            1        1             1                           0          0       0                           0     0            0

  FOLIVORA
  Megatherioidea                Hapalops                           1        2             12         21.1             1          1       3           15.0            1     1            6         13.0
                                Pelecyodon                         1        1             2          3.5              0          0       0           0.0             0     0            0         0.0
                                Hyperleptus                        1        1             1          1.8              0          0       0           0.0             0     0            0         0.0
                                Schismotherium                     1        1             3          5.3              0          0       0           0.0             1     1            1         2.2
                                Xyophorus                          0        0             0          0,0              0          0       0           0,0             1     1            1         2,2
                                Megatherioidea indet.                                     30         52.6                                16          80.0                               31        67.4
  Megatheriidae                 Planopinae indet.                  0        0             0          0.0              0          0       0           0.0             1     1            2         4.3
                                Megatheriidae indet.                                                 0.0                                             0.0                                4         8.7
  Megalonychidae                Eucholoeops                        1        2             6          10.5             0          0       0           0.0             0     0            0         0.0
  Mylodontidae                  Nematherium                        1        1             2          3.5              0          0       0           0.0             1     1            1         2.2
                                Mylodontidae indet.                                       1          1.8                                 1           5.0                                          0.0
                                Summary                            6        8             57                          1          1       20                          5     5            46

                                SUMMARY ALL TAXA                   13       15            129                         9          9       191                         10    10           230
  a
      Number of catalog entries.
  b
      Frequency of occurrence (number of subordinal records) divided by the total records at this locality. P/A, presence/absence; Freq., frequency.

Table 4
Occurrence and frequency of typothere, toxodont, astrapothere and litoptern specimens at FL 1–7, Barrancas Blancas, and Segundas Barrancas Blancas.
  Taxon                                                   FL 1-7                                                 Barrancas Blancas (BB)                              Segundas Barrancas Blancas (SBB)

  Higher level classification   Genus                     P/       N◦ of sp.        Na            Freq. (%)b     P/         N◦ of sp.    Na          Freq. (%)b      P/     N◦ of sp.        Na       Freq. (%)b
                                                          A                                                      A                                                   A

  TYPOTHERIA
  Hegetotheriidae               Hegetotherium             1        1                40            23.3           1          1            11          22.4            1      1                10       3.6
                                Pachyrukhos               0        0                0             0.0            0          0            0           0               1      1                86       30.8
  Interatheriidae               Interatheriun             1        2                70            40.7           1          2            17          34.7            1      2                59       21.1
                                Protypotherium            1        3                62            36.0           1          3            21          42.9            1      4                124      44.4
                                Interatheriidae indet.                              10            5.8            0                                                   0
                                Summary                   3        6                182                          4          7            49                          4      8                279

  TOXODONTIA
  Toxodontidae                  Nesodon                   1        1                14            31.1           1          1            12          31.6            1      1                18       39.1
                                Adinotherium              1        1                30            66.7           1          1            24          63.2            1      1                18       39.1
                                Toxodontidae indet.                                 11            24.4           0                                                   0
  Homolodotheriidae             Homalodotherium           1        1                1             2.2            1          1            2           5.3             1      1                10       21.7
                                Summary                   3        3                56                           3          3            38                          3      3                46

  ASTRAPOTHERIA
  Astrapotheriidae              Astrapotherium            1        1                8             100.0          1          1            4           100.0           1      1                12       100.0
  LITOPTERNA
  Proterotheriidae              Anisolophus               0        0                0             0              1          1            1           7.7             1      1                15       51.7
                                Diadiaphorus              1        1                4             22.2           1          1            3           23.1            1      1                1        3.4
                                Thoatherium               1        1                8             44.4           1          1            4           30.8            1      1                6        20.7
                                Tetramerorhinus           1        1                2             11.1           1          2            3           23.1            1      2                3        10.3
                                Proterotheriidae indet.                             13            72.2           0                                   0.0             1                       3        10.3
  Macraucheniidae               Theosodon                 1        1                4             22.2           1          1            2           15.4            1      1                1        3.4
                                Summary                   4        4                31                           5          6            13                          6      6                29

                                SUMMARY ALL TAXA          11       14               277                          13         17           104                         14     18               366
  a
      Number of catalog entries.
  b
      Frequency of occurrence (number of subordinal records) divided by the total records at this locality. P/A. presence/absence; Freq.. frequency.

                                                                                                      10
R.F. Kay et al.                                                                                                Journal of South American Earth Sciences 109 (2021) 103296

et al., 2012). They are only recorded at FL1-7 by one specimen of Pro­                 toxodontids. Homalodotherium is large (about 400 kg) brachyodont
tamandua, and there are no records at the RSC.                                         clawed “ungulate” that may have been a browser that inhabited rela­
                                                                                       tively closed habitats (Elissamburu, 2010).
4.1.4. Astrapotheria
   Astrapotheres, the largest South American native ungulates, were                    4.1.7. Litopterna
represented in the SCF by only one genus. We identified only 12 speci­                    Litopterns are much less abundant than notoungulates in the SCF. We
mens as belonging to Astrapotherium: 8 in FL1-7, 4 in BB and 12 in SBB                 identified 73 specimens in our collections: 31 from FL 1–7, 13 from BB,
(Table 4. Fig. 5). Astrapotherium was a one-ton browser that inhabited                 and 29 from SBB (Table 4). Only 7 of them correspond to the macrau­
closed habitats (Cassini, 2013).                                                       cheniid Theosodon (FL 1–7: 4 from, BB: 2, SBB: 1). We recorded 3 genera
                                                                                       and species of protherotheriids from FL 1–7, 4 genera and 5 species from
4.1.5. Typotheria                                                                      both BB and SBB.
    Typotheres are common elements of the SCF. We identified 510                          According to Cassini et al. (2012) litopterns are brachyodont
typothere specimens in our collections from FL 1–7, BB, and SBB: 182,                  mixed-feeders (Theosodon; 100–150 kg) or browsers (protherotheriids;
49, and 279, respectively (Table 4). At FL 1–7, 3 genera are recorded                  25–50 kg) in closed habitats.
(exact species counts are pending revisions). At BB, there are 3 genera
and 6 typothere species; at SBB 4 genera and 8 species. The composite                  4.1.8. Rodentia
stratigraphic ranges for typothere genera are depicted in Fig. 5.                          Caviomorph rodents are by far the most abundant mammals in the
    Most of the taxa are represented in similar abundances at FL 1–7 and               SCF. We recovered more than 900 identifiable specimens from FL 1–7,
BB. Interatherium and Protypotherium have similar abundances and                       BB, and SBB: 250, 173, and 507, respectively. At FL 1–7, nine genera are
Hegetotherium is common but less abundant than the other two. The                      recorded (species identifications are pending revisions); at BB, there are
situation at SBB is quite different. While Interatherium and Protypothe­               14 genera and 19 species; at SBB, 17 genera and 23 species (Table 5,
rium remain common, Hegetotherium declines in abundance with 4% of                     Fig. 6).
all typothere records versus 23% and 22% at FL 1–7 and BB.                                 The likelihood of recording a taxon at a particular locality may
    The clearest difference in typothere abundance is seen in Pachyr­                  depend on its rarity, and be a consequence of sampling probability. In
ukhos. This taxon is at least very rare (but more probably absent) in our              such cases, one cannot say with any certainty that a taxon would not also
material from FL 1–7 (one possible record out of 183 typothere speci­                  have occurred at the other localities had we collected a sufficient
mens), nor does (Tauber, 1997a) record this taxon in the Ea. La Costa                  number of specimens. For example, we record one specimen of Dudumus
Member of coastal SCF, whereas it does occur in the overlying Ea. La                   at SBB (0.2%) but none occur at either FL 1–7 or BB. The same is true of
Angelina Member, and is common in some places, e.g., at Killik Aike                    Acaremys (none at FL 1–7, 1.2% at BB, 0.4% at SBB), "Eocardia" excavata
Norte2; more details are provided in (Vizcaíno et al., 2021). Pachyrukhos              (0.4%, 2.9%, 0.8%), Schistomys (0%, 0% and 0.6%), Scleromys (0.8%,
is absent at BB but is by far the most common typothere at SBB (44%).                  4.2%, 0.8%), and Prospaniomys (0%, 0.6%, 0.4%). Befitting their rarity,
    As all the typotheres are characterized by euhypsodont cheek teeth,                either Dudumus nor Prospaniomys were recorded in the old collections of
there is no evident trend in this respect. The appearance of Pachyrukhos               RSC while Adelphomys, Pseudoacaremys are found in the old collections
in SBB is notable. This species is usually depicted as having been capable             but not in our samples (Fernicola et al., 2019c). The more common ro­
of moving rapidly using saltatorial locomotion. It had a short tail, limbs             dent taxa (at least 5% of specimens occur at least in one locality) are
arranged in a parasagittal orientation; a long hindlimb with the prox­                 represented in Fig. 6. In these commonly occurring taxa we may be on
imal segment much shorter than the distal all suggesting that it could                 safer ground to infer that the absence, or presence at a different level of
move rapidly using saltatorial locomotion (Cassini et al., 2012; Sinclair,             frequency may indicate some difference in community structure.
1908). Its presence at SBB has been interpreted as indicative of more                      Most of the more common taxa are represented in similar abundance
open areas in comparison with BB, FL 1–7 and BB (Fernández and                        at all three localities. These include Sciamys (5.2% at Fl 1–7, 5.2% at BB,
Muñoz, 2019).                                                                         3.0% at SBB), Spaniomys (6.4%, 11.0%, 8.8%), Steiromys (2.0%, 6.9%,
                                                                                       1.6%). Eocardia has abundances as 15.4% at FL 1–7, 11.6% at BB, and
4.1.6. Toxodontia                                                                      11.4% at SBB.
    Toxodontia are the most common large ungulates (around 100 kg or                       In a number of cases, a genus at SBB occurs far more frequently than
more) and probably mammals of the SCF but its two main groups                          at FL 1–7 or BB. Acarechimys, a brachydont taxon, appears 8.0% of the
(toxodontids and homalodotheriids) are very disparately represented.                   time at SBB but only 2.0% at FL 1–7 and 1.7% at BB. The common
We identified 140 Toxodontia specimens in our collections from FL 1–7,                 euhysodont taxon Prolagostomus accounts for 26.2% of all rodent records
BB, and SBB: 56, 38, and 46, respectively (Table 4, Fig. 5).                           at SBB (131 specimens) but we have no records at FL 1–7 and only 2
    Among toxodontids, two genera and two species are represented in                   specimens at BB. Pliolagostomus is absent at FL 1–7 and BB whereas at
the three localities. The remains of the Adinotherium are twofold those of             SBB it is quite common (7.6%). Stichomys shows a gradual increase in
Nesodon in the FL 1–7 and BB, but both are equally recorded at SBB. Both               abundance (absent at FL 1–7, 4.1% at BB, 9.2% at SBB).
are considered ambulatory grazing ungulates of moderate (Adinotherium                      Several taxa decrease in numbers, especially Perimys (19.0%, 11.6%,
about 100 kg) to large size (Nesodon, about 500 kg) (Cassini et al., 2012).            6.8%), and Neoreomys (46.8%, 28% 14%). Respecting Perimys, there are
Another toxodont Hyperotoxodon is recorded from the old collections of                 also a difference in body size of the species (Arnal et al., 2019). Perimys
RSC but Fernández and Muñoz (2019) did not report it from our                        erutus (a small species) and Perimys onustus (a larger species) both occur
collections.                                                                           at BB and SBB but the former is more common is more common at BB (11
    Homalodotheriids are represented by a single genus and species                     specimens to 1 specimen) and the latter is more abundant at SBB (1
usually quite rare, at least at FL 1–7 (1 specimen) and BB (2 specimens).              specimen to 23 specimens).
We identified more remains from SBB (10), but still far fewer than                         Table 6 lists the niche characteristics of commonly occurring rodents
                                                                                       in the Santa Cruz Formation at FL 1–7, BB, and SBB. Among the more
                                                                                       common rodent taxa, there are no discernible trends in body size other
  2                                                                                    than in species of Perimys. Locomotor habits are poorly documented but
    Killik Aike Norte (formerly Felton’s Estancia) on the north shore of the
estuary of Río Gallegos was previously suggested to be temporally equivalent to        no obvious trends are apparent—the more common rodent taxa were
FL 1–7 (Ea. La Costa Member) (Tejedor et al., 2006) but reevaluation of the            ground-dwellers (Muñoz et al., 2019). The one possibly scansorial
tephra indicate a much younger age and allocation to the upper levels of the           (semi-arboreal) taxon Steiromys remains stable in numbers. Acarechimys,
coastal SCF (Trayler et al., 2020b).                                                   with some fossorial tendencies, increases in abundance at SBB Perimys,

                                                                                  11
You can also read