Integrated Resource Planning - ROUNDTABLE 21-1 FEBRUARY 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
MEETING LOGISTICS Electronic version of presentation: https://www.portlandgeneral.com/our-company/energy-strategy/resource-planning/integrated-resource- planning/irp-public-meetings Teams Meeting Please click the meeting link sent to your email or here: ▪ Join Microsoft Teams Meeting ▪ +1 971-277-2317 (dial this number into your phone for best results) ▪ PW: 863 207 757# *Please use Microsoft Edge or Google Chrome with Teams as it will give you the best experience During the presentation, all attendees will be muted; to unmute yourself via computer, click on the microphone that appears on the screen when you move your mouse To unmute yourself over the phone, press *6 If you call in using your phone in addition to joining via the online link, please make sure to mute your computer audio There is now a meeting chat feature rather than a Q&A feature. Pull this up on the menu bar when you move your mouse and look for the little message icon IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 2
SAFETY MOMENT Do one thing: February Make a plan for where to meet your family or group in the event of an emergency One at your home and one outside your neighborhood Decide where you would go and what route you would take to get there (hotel, friend/family home, shelter) Practice your evacuation drill and route Make notes on pet friendly hotels and animal shelters IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 3
AGENDA Welcome and introductions 15 minutes Community values and the 2022 IRP 15 minutes Price forecasts: part one 30 minutes Supply side options 30 minutes Portfolio requests from participants 10 minutes IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 4
COMMUNITY VALUES ROUNDTABLE 20-4 July 29, 2020 28 participants What we heard: Participant values Key topics of interest IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 6
COMMUNITY VALUES Prompts we discussed in July 2020 • What is important to you as a consumer of energy and/or a representative of your organization? • Are there values from the 2019 IRP process that resonate with you or that do not resonate with you? • What additional values would you like to bring to this process that have not been mentioned? • What would you like to see from PGE in how we approach this process? How will you know that you have been heard? • What else would you like to share? IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 7
COMMUNITY VALUES IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 8
COMMUNITY VALUES What we heard about most from the attendees in July was a focus on… • How to achieve reliability and affordability in a decarbonized system • How to think about risk and uncertainty • How to promote community involvement in PGE processes and how to clearly communicate what the IRP action plan means to the public • How to address and prioritize the climate crisis in IRP analysis IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 9
COMMUNITY VALUES How we integrate the values conversation • Used to guide framing questions that direct analysis • Inform studies, model inputs, considerations of risk, and other influences on decision points • Adjust engagement to fit participant needs • Adapt how and when we share information, draft results, and parts of the written report to support participant engagement IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 10
COMMUNITY VALUES As we move forward with the 2022 IRP, we will continue to listen and respond to the values, questions, and concerns that come up in our process • We will continue to partner with PGE’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion team to evolve our public process • We will revisit the values and priorities shared in July 2020 as well as additional input shared during the process • We will continue to welcome feedback and suggestions for analytical processes We welcome feedback at irp@pgn.com IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 11
QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION? IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 12
PRICE FORECASTS: PART ONE NORA XU ROUNDTABLE 21-1 IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 13
WECC-wide market price forecasting IRP RT 2/17/2021 14
WECC-wide market price forecasting • Wholesale electricity prices forecasts are developed through WECC-wide dispatch of Aurora under different Market Price Futures • In the 2019 IRP, PGE examined the impact on wholesale electricity price forecasts resulting from variation in gas prices, carbon prices, the WECC-wide resource buildout, and hydro conditions • We started from a base database developed by a third-party research and consultancy company, Wood Mackenzie (WM) • WM’s 2020H1 database released in July 2020, 2020H2 to be released in February 2021 • Database contains WECC-wide resources build-out, load, fuel prices, and constraints over time in a zonal topology • We use the database with scenarios for inputs such as carbon pricing and natural gas to simulate the WECC on an hourly basis through least-cost commitment and dispatch IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 15
WECC-wide market price forecasting PGE Updates Reference WECC Database WECC-wide Participant Feedback • Topology (Tx and zones) price • Existing resources Carbon Natural Gas • Additional resources Prices Prices simulations • Clean energy policies (RPS and Hydro Renewable state-wide clean policies) Buildout conditions Econometric Load DERs and need scenarios PGE detailed resource modeling Portfolio Analysis in ROSE-E Candidate new resources PGE Zone Model • Variable costs • Energy value Existing resources • Emissions Contracts • Dispatch • Market Energy Position Customer Programs IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 16
Natural gas price forecasts: Reference Reference Natural Gas Price Forecasts WM 2019H2 • Natural gas price forecasts have generally been WM 2020H1 decreasing over the last WM 2020H2 two years across multiple vendors and forecast EIA 2019 AEO Ref sources EIA 2020 AEO Ref • This slide shows the set of EIA 2021 AEO Ref forecasts we would categorize as the Reference V1 2020Q1 gas price scenario V1 2020Q4 NWPCC 2021 Power Plan Ref V2 2019 IRP - Ref IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 17
Natural gas price forecasts: High High Natural Gas Price Forecasts • This set of forecasts is in 18 the High gas price 16 EIA 2019 AEO Low oil and gas resource scenario 14 and technology • Recent High gas price 12 EIA 2020 AEO Low oil and gas supply scenario forecasts are also lower relative to previous 10 EIA 2021 AEO Low forecasts 8 oil and gas supply 6 2019 IRP - High 4 NWPCC 2021 2 Power Plan High 0 2019 IRP - Ref IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 18
Draft natural gas price scenarios • We continue to propose three Proposed Draft Natural Gas Forecast Scenarios gas price forecast scenarios: Low, Reference and High Near term forward WM 2020H2 curve will be • Near-term: PGE forward curve. updated in 2021 This will likely be updated this EIA 2021 AEO quarter Low oil and gas supply • Proposed draft long-term sources: Low Scenario • Low: Continue end of forward curve price flat in real dollars • Reference: likely WM 2020H2 • High: likely EIA AEO 2021 IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 19
Carbon prices in the 2019 IRP 2019 IRP Carbon Price Futures • PGE has included carbon pricing in IRP analysis since 2008, consistent with Order No. 08-339 • In the 2019 IRP, we used three carbon price futures: Low, Reference and High • California Energy Commission (CEC)’s low, mid and high forecasts used for the three scenarios • Additionally, we discussed and presented the Social Cost of Carbon (3% discount rate) informationally IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 20
Carbon price forecasts Carbon Price Forecasts • Two carbon pricing 250 sources are depicted to the right 200 • The CEC’s Low, Mid and Carbon Prices ($/Metric Tonne Nominal) High forecasts from the 150 2019 Integrated Energy Policy Report (IEPR) 100 • The EPA’s 5%, 3% and 50 2.5% discount rate Social Cost of Carbon Dioxide (SC-CO2) values from 0 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 2013 Low CEC Mid CEC High CEC Ref WM Social Cost (3% discount) Social Cost (2.5% discount) Social Cost (5% discount) IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 21
Draft carbon price scenarios Proposed Draft Carbon Price Forecast Scenarios 250 • We continue to propose three carbon pricing forecast scenarios: Low, Reference and High 200 • Carbon Prices ($/Metric Tonne Low: CEC Low 2019 IEPR 150 • Reference: CEC Mid 2019 IEPR 100 • High: EPA SC-CO2 2.5% discount Nominal) rate 50 0 2026 2031 2036 2041 2046 Low CEC Reference CEC Social Cost (2.5% discount) IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 22
WECC-wide Resource Buildout • Renewables: increase in renewables driven by clean energy policy goals and improving renewable economics • Storage: increase in storage driven by forecasted cost declines and clean energy policy goals • Coal: WECC-wide coal is steadily reduced over time • Gas: Less new gas is built compared to the previous databases IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 23
Draft WECC-wide Buildout 2019 IRP Reference Buildout 2019 IRP High Renewable Buildout WM 2020H1 Buildout IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 24
- - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2028 2028 2029 2029 2030 2030 Solar 2031 Wind 2031 2032 2032 2033 2033 2034 2034 2035 2035 2036 2036 2037 2037 2038 2038 2039 2039 2040 2040 - 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 - 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 2020 2020 2021 2021 2022 2022 2023 2023 2024 2024 2025 2025 2026 2026 2027 2027 2028 2028 2029 2029 2030 2030 2031 2031 Storage 2032 2032 Natural Gas 2033 2033 2034 2034 2035 2035 2036 2036 2037 2037 2038 2038 2039 2039 2040 2040 - 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 Draft WECC-wide Buildout by Fuel 2029 2030 Coal 2031 2032 Legend 2033 IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 2034 2035 2036 25 2037 2038 2039 2040
PNW Hydro Conditions • PNW hydro generation can strongly influence electricity prices • In the 2016 IRP, we considered a Reference hydro condition and examined critical hydro conditions under reference gas and carbon prices • In the 2019 IRP, we expanded to consider three PNW hydro conditions: Low, Reference and High • Low and High are modeled as +/- 10 percent (approximately one standard deviation) of annual PNW hydro energy • We plan to continue to consider Low, Reference and High PNW hydro conditions IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 26
Questions & Comments We’re seeking your feedback! IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 27
SUPPLY-SIDE OPTIONS SETH WIGGINS, ROBERT BROWN ROUNDTABLE 21-1 IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 28
Supply-side Options Economic Analysis: Evaluate characteristics of resources plausibly found in the region Gather all possible (e.g., biomass, conventional geothermal) Portfolio Analysis: generation technology Conduct portfolio optimization on the set of (e.g., high-altitude resources most informative wind, thorium) Emerging Technologies: to our evaluation Highlight technologies that (e.g., SE WA Wind, Solar + might have future potential Storage) (e.g., hydrokinetic, advanced geothermal) Note: examples are illustrative; PGE has not yet determined the resources in each category IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 29
Supply-side Options As discussed at the August 2020 roundtable meeting, we decided to utilize publicly available sources of supply-side costs and operating characteristics Fuel Type Resource Data Source Wind Oregon Gorge, SE Washington, Montana, Offshore EIA: AEO 2020 Solar Central Oregon, Oregon George, Willamette Valley NREL: 2020 ATB Solar + Storage NREL: 2020 ATB Hybrid Wind + Storage Combined Geothermal Geothermal NREL: 2020 ATB Biomass Biomass EIA: AEO 2020 Pumped Storage Pumped Storage Other: PNNL, NWPCC Li-Ion 2-24 Hours NREL: 2020 ATB Battery Storage Vanadium Flow Batteries Other: PNNL, NWPCC Hydrogen Production, storage, generation Other: PNNL, NWPCC Combined-cycle CT EIA: AEO 2020 Natural Gas Simple-cycle CT EIA: AEO 2020 Hydrokinetic (wave or tidal) Emerging Resource Renewables Waste-to-energy (municipal solid waste) Emerging Resource Small modular reactor Emerging Resource Additional Hydrogen co-fire (at new natural gas facilities) Other: PNNL, NWPCC DRAFT IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 30
Supply-side Options • Comparison of select draft overnight capital costs to 2019 IRP (2026 COD) DRAFT IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 31
Supply-side Options • Comparison of select draft overnight capital costs trajectories to 2019 IRP (% of base year) • Relatively larger near-term declines for projected Solar, Li-ion, and CT costs DRAFT IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 32
PORTFOLIO REQUESTS FROM PARTICIPANTS SETH WIGGINS ROUNDTABLE 21-1 IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 33
Portfolio Requests • Our portfolio optimization model ROSE-E has flexibility to evaluate any specific resource/size/year combination For example, we could estimate the portfolio effects of adding 235 MW of SE Washington wind in 2036 and/or 150 MW of 6-hr batteries in 2026 In the 2019 IRP, we used this capability to evaluate the size and timing of 16 different renewable additions MW/year combinations • We are open to any suggestions for portfolio questions to be evaluated • Please contact us (email: IRP@PGN.com) IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 34
QUESTIONS/DISCUSSION? IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 35
THANK YOU CONTACT US AT: IRP@PGN.COM IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 36
ATTACHMENT A: ACRONYMS CEC: California energy commission NWPCC: northwest power and conservation council COD: commercial operation date PNNL: pacific northwest national DER: distributed energy resources laboratory EIA AOE: energy information QF: qualifying facility administration annual energy outlook RPS: renewable portfolio standard ELCC: effective load carrying SB 978: Senate Bill 978 capacity WECC-wide: Western IRP: integrated resource plan Interconnection (today- the generators, transmission lines, and LUCAS, ROM, PGE-zone, Sequoia, other facilities that comprise the ROSE-E, and AURORA: models PGE Western Interconnection electrical uses for IRP analysis (see Appendix grid, which is a NERC region) I: 2019 IRP Modeling Details from the 2019 IRP) WM: Wood Mackenzie NREL: national renewable energy laboratory IRP Roundtable 2/17/2021 37
You can also read