Humans and their Environments Integrated Studies 2021-22
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Humans and their Environments Integrated Studies 2021-22 Each year the Benjamin Franklin Scholars (BFS) Program selects an extraordinary group of incoming freshmen to pursue the liberal arts intensively, guided by some of Penn's brightest lights. For students in the College, BFS begins with the Integrated Studies Program (ISP), an exclusive, year-long residential learning experience in which you will survey the broad territory of the arts and sciences while living alongside fellow students and faculty in Hill College House. The program brings together the humanities, social sciences, and sciences into a coordinated exploration of the great ideas that continue to drive our understanding of the world and the human place in it. One key element of ISP is working to develop an understanding of how methods and contents from distinct disciplines can inform one another so as to produce a deeper understanding of a range of questions. A mix of lectures, small seminars, and guest speakers, Integrated Studies fulfills a portion of the College's General Education requirement while building the solid foundation needed for any major area of study you decide to pursue. By the end of their freshman year, BFS students have not only pursued an intensive introduction to four different disciplines, but engaged in some of the most challenging and important complex thinking which lies at the heart of the liberal arts. We are looking for bold thinkers who become more excited by ideas the more complex they get. During the academic year of 2021-22, you will study two aspects of humans’ relationships with their environment – Food, and the Anthropocene. Combining Anthropology and History, Earth Science and History of Science, you will not only learn the rudiments of those disciplines and read contemporary research in those fields, but also think about how each contributes to understanding our place in the natural world – both as agents and victims, and as manipulators of and profoundly shaped by our relationships with the earth and its products. Admissions questions 1. Explain how enrolling in the liberal arts and sciences during your four years at Penn matters to you. (100 words or fewer) 2. Why is integrating the humanities, natural sciences/math and social sciences important to the liberal arts? (100 words or fewer) 3. After your year in the Integrated Studies Program, what would be the mark for you of having achieved success in the Program? (100 words or fewer) 4. You will be studying Earth Sciences, History of Science, History and Anthropology. It will be challenging to excel in all four areas. How do you anticipate approaching what might be a new kind of academic challenge for you? (100 words or fewer) 5. Following these questions, you will find syllabi for the year in ISP. Please read these syllabi and then review Week 6 of the Food semester, and Week 2 of the Anthropocene semester. Choose either the Fall 2021 pair of courses or the Spring 2022 pair of courses (but not both) and answer ONE of the following questions. 1
Food and Society: Week 6 examines the impact of agriculture from anthropological and historical perspectives. The data from two major subfields of anthropology, archaeology and biological anthropology, tell us how the decision to grow crops impacted both human bodies (such as higher fertility rates and decreasing dental health) and social structures (such as increasing urbanization and growing gender differentiation). Recent histories have sought to trace the ways in which economic inequality stems from agricultural regimes. Central to the historical approach is how a particular phenomenon - inequality - results from settled agriculture, such as charting the development of different labor regimes, or different ways of owning land. In your opinion, was the “agricultural revolution” a good thing? How might the transition from nomadic food gathering to agricultural food production be viewed differently from Anthropological and Historical lenses? The Anthropocene: Week 2 of the course introduces the concept of the Anthropocene. First coined by an atmospheric scientist about two decades ago, the term has since been heavily debated by the Anthropocene Working Group (an interdisciplinary research group within the International Commission on Stratigraphy, a group of geologists). At the same time, social scientists, the humanities, and artists have all engaged with the concept and developed their own interpretations and critiques. What do you think it is about the Anthropocene that generates so much interest from such a wide range of disciplines? Do you think these different perspectives can be reconciled? 2
INTG 001 (Fall): Food An Anthropology of Eating: Food, Health, Identity, and Society “Next to breathing, eating is perhaps the most essential of all human activities, and one with which much of social life is entwined,” (Mintz and Du Bois 2002). Food is simultaneously a universal, human necessity and a key medium through which individual and cultural identity is expressed. Evolutionarily, food sharing may represent a large part of how humans came to be so successful. Likewise, changes in food production systems underlies some of the most critical moments in the deep history of humanity. Consumption has been and always will be a foundational component of society and culture and, with the challenges facing human society today, the study of food is more pressing than ever. This stream is designed to survey the complex ways that food and food-related activities are woven into human behavior. As a discipline dedicated to the study of human physical and cultural diversity in all times and places, anthropology is a fitting lens through which to examine the multi-faceted nature of human foodways. We will examine foodways from a holistic anthropological perspective by applying a four-field approach, integrating discussions of the biological, cultural, linguistic, and archaeological contexts of food production, preparation, presentation, consumption, and disposal. We will consider the role of food in critical junctions of human history and learn how evolution, history, and culture have shaped food into both a dietary need and a cultural construction. We will address contemporary issues related to food, health, identity, and society such as food insecurity, geo-politics, and consumerism. In doing so, we will think critically about our own personal food histories and about Philadelphia’s food culture. Food in History and History through Food Food seems like an unchanging fact of life: we need it, it needs to be healthy, it would be nice if it tasted good, and we shouldn’t eat too much of it. Almost all of those “facts” turn out to be historically contingent: different historical populations have required much more, and much less, food than our 2000 calories; what constituted “healthy” food has varied from lard to vegetables; and the cultural definition of “overeating” has varied from meat once per month to enough to induce vomiting. Because many aspects of food culture seem unchanging, but are subject to radical change over time, food is a perfect vehicle to interrogate the importance and meaning of history. A history of food also requires multiple branches of history - economic, political, social and cultural history - and demands that the historian juggle all these kinds of history at once, while asking what different pasts, different kinds of history reveal. Food history, then, is advanced history. This stream provides both a historical lens on food - its production, consumption and movement - and a lens on history, providing an introduction to different subfields of history and how they interact and operate. Our trajectory will thus deliberately eschew chronological order in favor of thematic problems, problems which allow us an opportunity to explore both a different branch of history, as well as a different historical problem. We’ll ask how food and food production has been used to dice up history and value different periods over others; how the notion of “health” and its measurement has changed over time; the role that food has played in the construction of national identity and the definitions of capitalism; and the role of food in religious and political histories. The problems of inequality, oppression and scarcity will run through all our discussions, and the role that food, or its lack, plays in the lives and histories of working, enslaved and marginalized people. 3
Both streams of the course will make use of frequent experiential exercises, from food shopping and cooking exercises, to food budgeting and visits to excavations, gardens, and archives. The idea will be to use your everyday experiences to denaturalize food, to force you to rethink a “normal” activity through anthropological and historical lenses. WEEK Anthropology History Setting the Anthropological Table: Writing Histor(ies) with Food: What Week 1 An introduction to anthropology, its key does a history of Europe and America methods and concepts, and the look like when told through food? relationship between its various What it means to do economic, social, subdisciplines. How does one think about and cultural history - all at the same food anthropologically? time. Experiential Exercise: Smartphone Food Record: What do you eat in a day? What’s the last food you photographed? How have your answers to these questions been influenced by your own personal food history? Our Heritage as Omnivores, Primates, Food and the Idea of Progress: How Week 2 and Hominids: has food been used as a proxy for What is the relationship between food human progress - or its opposite? An and human evolution? Discuss how diet introduction to social history, using affected the evolution of our physical, food as a proxy for historical change behavioral, and cultural characteristics. and our valuation of it. Experiential Exercise: Fieldtrip: Visit to the Penn Museum’s physical anthropology collection. Good Foods / Bad Foods: Nutritionism Beer, bacon and beans: Defining Week 3 and Anthropology: “Healthy Diets” in the Historical Past: Explore the changing nature of the Biological “health” would seem to be a Omnivore’s Dilemma. Are there “good historical constant, but what people foods” and “bad foods”? How have have thought was “healthy” has concepts of nutrition changed through changed radically over time, reflecting time and what defines good nutrition social, cultural and economic values. today? Experiential Exercise: Food Labels In Your Kitchen: What foods do you have in your kitchen? How are they labelled? How are these products made meaningful – socially, economically, nutritionally – by their packaging? Our Bodies, Metabolism, and Health: The Historical Body and Human Week 4 Explore the history and application of Health: nutritional science in anthropology. Are How have historians used, and we what we eat? How do social and misused, biometric measurements like economic inequalities get under the skin? height and weight to assess the “health” of a population. Experiential Exercise: Biometrics Through Time: We’ll ask you to use different biometric measurements, popular at different moments in time, to “evaluate” your body. 4
How Humans Get Their Food: Studying Herding and Hoeing: Pastoralism and Week 5 Foodways in the Past: Sedentary Agriculture in History: How do we classify the ways that people The modes of food production have get their food? What influences these been one of the major categories different subsistence practices? How do historians have used to slice up history they promote relationships between - and peoples. people and structure daily life? Experiential Exercise: Urban Foraging: Edible plants are found from the Quad to Van Pelt library and include species like juneberries, hickory nuts, and spicebushes. The Origins and Impact of Agriculture: Agriculture and the Origins of Week 6 The relationship between plants, animals, Inequality: and people is complex. What were the Some historians have argued that push and pull processes that led to the human economic inequality only really early domestication of plants and animals? begins with sedentary agriculture. What happened as humans exerted more They point to the ability to store - and control and started to produce their own thus accumulate - food reserves, and food? How do these trends continue to the need to control, and eventually impact the contemporary world? We’ll own, land. We’ll examine historians’ examine archaeological, biological, and analysis of Roman, medieval and early cultural anthropological data to answer modern agricultural regimes as these questions from the perspectives of productive of specific systems of both nutritional and social “health.” inequality - slavery, serfdom and tenancy. Experiential Exercise: Fieldtrip: Food tour of the Penn Museum’s galleries. How Food Moves: Colonialism and Columbian Exchange and the Week 7 Industrialism: Invention of “National” Cuisine: How Connecting the Old and New Worlds imported foods have been used in the changed everything. Today’s foodways creation of modern nationalism. The and identities are the product of a long case of Italy. history of colonial encounters and changing technology. Experiential Exercise: Life History of a Dish: Pick a dish. Where do the ingredients come from? When and how did they converge? Did the dish grow out of similar dishes? Did it change through time? How has its popularity spread or changed? Eating Together: Food, Identity, and Cooking and Labor: Stories of African Week 8 Social Relations: American Cooks in Philadelphia: Feasting has long been a feature of We’ll discuss the case of George human sociality, but so has everyday Washington’s chef Hercules (and visit consumption. How has eating together his kitchen) and the Dutrieuille family shaped identity and social relations caterers (and see their archive) through time? Experiential Exercise: Fieldtrip: Visit to Hercules’ kitchen at the first President’s house. 5
What Words Bring to the Table: The Loaded Table: Marie Antoinette, Week 9 How are food classifications and rules and Nero: embedded in the social order? We’ll Descriptions of super-abundance as explore the concept of the recipe and the political history differences between oral and textual cooking traditions. Experiential Exercise: Recipe Chaîne Opératoire: Choose a recipe to make with a friend. Record through a variety of media, such as writing, photographs, film, or sound, the series of steps to make the dish. Share the food you’ve cooked together, as part of the living transmission of culinary knowledge. Deciphering a Meal: Words and the Empty Table: Week 10 What gives someone or something How historians versus literary writers culinary authenticity? By watching cooking have parsed the absence of food. The shows, we’ll examine how the language case of the Irish Famine used tells us about the values of the time and of the intended audience. Experiential Exercise: Talking about Food: We’ll watch selections from Diners, Drive- Ins, and Dives and Arracht (2019), a film in Irish about the Irish famine. Food and the Body: Interrogating our Religion, Denial and the Female Week 11 Personal Relationships with Food: Body: How are advertising firms, mass media, How Medieval Christian traditions of and the beauty, fashion, and cosmetic fasting shaped female identity. surgery industries changing the way people define beauty? How does this affect our relationship with food? Experiential Exercise: Reflecting on Daily Consumption: Keep a food diary while reading one of a selection of readings, from Cosmopolitan magazine to Lives of the Desert Fathers. The Globalization of Taste: Olive Oil and Bananas: Two Stories Week 12 How global is your taste? When and about Global Food: where did those tastes develop? We’ll An introduction to histories of explore the localization of global foods capitalism via large-scale food export. using sushi, hamburgers, and coffee. Experiential Exercise: Tracking Your Food: All of the food in your kitchen will have been grown somewhere—where? These foodstuffs are no longer living and have been processed in some manner for distribution and storage—how? How easy is it for you to (re)connect with the steps involved in producing this food? The New Face of Hunger: Eating on less than $2 a day: Food and Week 13 What is food security? What is food Development: sovereignty? Why are so many people An introduction to modern malnourished in the richest country on development economics and earth? household budgets Experiential Exercise: The Cost of Consumption: Keep a food budget for three days. 6
Eating Locally: Philly Phoods: Not Eating Locally: Food Scarcity in Week 14 Looking at Philly farmers’ markets and the Philadelphia: local food scene, what defines a Philly A discussion with local policy makers on food? What does it mean to be a food scarcity in the local community locavore? 7
INTG 002 (Spring): The Anthropocene The concept of the Anthropocene — the age of humanity — is widely and seriously debated by Earth scientists, social scientists, humanities scholars, activists, and artists. It provides a controversial but compelling new lens through which to examine human-environment relationships. Earth Science: Earth system science (ESS) endeavours to understand the structure and functioning of the Earth as a complex, adaptive system. As an integrative natural science discipline, ESS combines evidence from geology, biology (especially ecosystem ecology), and various environmental sciences to create a relatively new view of our environment. While ESS recognizes that life exerts a strong influence on the Earth’s chemical and physical environment, humans have not been historically integrated in the conceptualization of the Earth system except as a minor external factor. There is now unequivocal evidence for the various ways that humans have altered the “natural” functioning of Earth systems, and out of these observations was born the term “Anthropocene”. We’ll use the tools of EES to explore: 1) the beginnings of the Anthropocene and whether it should be formalized as a geological time period, 2) how and to what degree humans have altered Earth systems, and 3) what the Earth may look like in the future - with or without humans. History: Historical scholarship seeks to develop nuanced understandings of the complexities of the human past, but until recently has taken a fairly simplistic view of the nonhuman entities and forces that make human life possible and which, in turn, are affected by human activities. In recent years, historians have begun to develop more sophisticated ways of understanding the entanglement of human and nonhuman histories through time - a project for which the concept of the Anthropocene has served as an inspiration, as well as a bridge to parallel developments in the natural sciences. Historians are increasingly crafting narratives that acknowledge the role of humans in shaping the Earth and the role of the Earth in shaping human history. We’ll examine some of those narratives and the kinds of evidence used to support them, while also exploring the history of scientific, artistic, and literary representations of the Earth and humanity’s place on it. Professor Alain Plante Professor Etienne Benson WEEK (Earth Science) (History) What is Earth system science (ESS)? We will introduce ourselves, describe Week 1: We will introduce ourselves, describe the basic questions and themes of the Introductions the basic questions and themes of the course, and review aims, expectations, course, and review aims, and requirements. expectations, and requirements. What is the Anthropocene? Until How does the idea of the Week 2: recently, humans had been Anthropocene challenge the The Human Age considered too small and the Earth distinction between “nature” and too large for human activities to have “culture”? Historians and other any pervasive and enduring impact scholars in the humanities and social on the natural function of the Earth’s sciences have traditionally seen the systems (ie, atmosphere, nonhuman world as beyond their hydrosphere, biosphere, lithosphere) scope — certainly a necessary at the global scale. But in 2000, Paul foundation for what they study (you Crutzen, an atmospheric scientist can’t have politics or novels without and Nobel laureate, declared that we air, water, and soil), but not itself the 8
had “left the Holocene” and entered object of their study. By asserting that a new human-dominated geologic human activities have fundamentally age. In the intervening 20 years, the reshaped the Earth’s systems (i.e., scientific evidence for human that politics and novels can transform induced changes to the functioning air, water, soil, etc.), the of Earth systems (climate, Anthropocene idea has challenged biodiversity, biogeochemical cycling, humanities scholars to expand their etc.) is unequivocal. We will examine scope to include the nonhuman this evidence and how it amounts to world. At the same time, humanities a new geological age - the scholars have brought their own Anthropocene. critical perspectives to the Anthropocene debate, seeking to show how the idea builds on existing — and sometimes problematic — ways of envisioning humanity and its place on the Earth. What is geologic time and how have How and why do historians distinguish Week 3: scientists ascertained Earth’s history? between different historical periods? Time We will examine how geologic We will consider the possibilities and periods are defined and how the limits of efforts to expand the Anthropocene fits in or not. timescales of historical scholarship. How do we measure Earth as a Can we have direct experience of the Week 4: whole? We’ll explore the various global environment? We will consider Space developments in Earth science that the history of viewing the Earth as an have allowed us to increasingly enclosed sphere in which we dwell, measure natural phenomena at this but also as a globe that we can survey largest scale, and the implications for from the outside — or even hold in how the Earth is now seen as a finite, our hands. interconnected, system. When did the Anthropocene start? Why did the Anthropocene start? We Week 5: We will consider various proposals will consider challenges to the idea Origin Stories for the origins of the Anthropocene, that certain technological advances, focusing specifically on the relevance such as the development of an of stratigraphic evidence. efficient steam engine at the end of the 18th century, are responsible for the Anthropocene. How have humans altered the What kind of knowledge can we have Week 6: climate? We’ll contrast periods of of the future? We will situate today’s Climate climate change from the Earth’s past climate models in the longer history of with current climate change in terms forecasting, prediction, and projection. of both magnitudes and causes. While rivers represent a tiny fraction How have rivers shaped human Week 7: of the water on Earth, they are societies, and vice versa? By studying Rivers essential to ecosystem function and the history of rivers, we will consider human wellbeing. How have humans the confluence of human and changed the quantity and quality of nonhuman forms of historical agency. water in rivers? 9
The history of agriculture and the How did agriculture become Week 8: growth of food production is industrialized? We will consider the Nutrients intimately linked with the increased history of agricultural “improvement” reliance of fertilizer. How has the and industrialization over the longue increased production and use of durée. fertilizers changed the global cycling of nutrient elements such as nitrogen and phosphorus? How have humans changed Earth’s How do we narrate loss and mourn Week 9: biodiversity? We’ll explore the the passing of ways of life? In this Biodiversity degree to which the Anthropocene session we will consider the loss of may be engendering a sixth mass biodiversity in this broader sense. extinction. Maps of the Earth’s surface typically What’s the value of wilderness? And Week 10: illustrate the natural biological does wilderness even exist? We will Land ecosystems and rarely account for consider the troubled history of the presence or impacts of humans valuing “pristine nature” and on those spaces. We’ll explore new wilderness in Western cultures. ways of “putting humans on the map”. Humans have constructed objects and Who enjoys the benefits and who Week 11: created materials never before seen suffers the harms of our era of Stuff on Earth. A major unintended material abundance? We’ll examine consequence of the built environment the historical origins of mass is pollution. While global, these production and the consumer society. objects and materials are not evenly distributed. Earth system science is the product of How have artists envisioned the Week 12: our increased capacity to generate Anthropocene? We will survey Visualization observational data at unprecedented contemporary artistic experiments rates. How are these data generated, and situate them in relation to the managed, manipulated, and finally, long history of picturing humanity’s communicated in an understandable relationship to its environment. way? How long will the human traces on Why and how have people imagined Week 13: the Earth last? We’ll examine the the disappearance of humanity from The Earth After concept of ecosystem resilience and the face of the Earth? We will consider Us attempt to project what the the history of predictions of human stratigraphic record might look like extinction, asking what such after humans. predictions can tell us about the worlds and values of the people who made them. What reasons do we have for What reasons do we have for hope? Week 14: resignation? Despite a few bright Some people have argued that the Resignation and spots, the news about environmental Anthropocene offers an opportunity to Hope in the change is mostly bad. In this session rethink humanity’s place on Earth in a Anthropocene we will consider reasons to resign way that might lead to a better world ourselves to the inevitable, as well as than the one we’re leaving behind. In 10
some of the possible benefits of this session, we’ll assess the argument accepting that our world has changed for a “good Anthropocene.” for the worse. 11
You can also read