H2NEW: Hydrogen (H2) from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water Overview
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
H2NEW: Hydrogen (H2) from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water Overview Director: Bryan Pivovar, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Deputy Director: Richard Boardman, Idaho National Laboratory (INL) Date: 6/13/2021 Project ID # P196 DOE Hydrogen Program 2021 Annual Merit Review and Peer Evaluation Meeting This presentation does not contain any proprietary, confidential, or otherwise restricted information.
Project Goals Goal: H2NEW will address components, materials integration, and manufacturing R&D to enable manufacturable electrolyzers that meet required cost, durability, and performance targets, simultaneously, in order to enable $2/kg hydrogen. H2 production Low-Temperature target
Overview Timeline and Budget National Lab • Start date (launch): October 1, 2020 Consortium Team* • FY21 DOE funding: $10M • Anticipate minimum $50M over 5 years • 75% low temperature electrolysis due to higher TRL and intermittency Barriers • Durability • Cost • Efficiency * H2NEW has started as an exclusive National Lab funded effort but it is anticipated to expand to include academic and industrial partners in the near future. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 3
H2NEW Acknowledgements DOE Managers: David Peterson, Ned Stetson, Will Gibbons, Katie Randolph, Eric Miller, James Vickers NREL Team Members: Bryan Pivovar, Shaun Alia, Mike Ulsh, Guido Bender, Nick Wunder, James Young, Jason Zack, Scott Mauger, Carlos Baez-Cotto, Jason Pfeilsticker, Sunil Khandavalli, Allen Kang, Elliot Padgett, Dave Ginley, Sarah Shulda LBNL Team Members: Nemanja Danilovic, Ethan Crumlin, Ahmet Kusoglu, Michael Tucker, Adam Weber, Julie Fornaciari, Claire Arthurs, Arthur Dizon, Jiangjin Liu, Grace Anderson ANL Team Members: Debbie Myers, Rajesh Ahluwalia, C. Firat Cetinbas, Andrew Star, Xiaohua Wang, Nancy Kariuki, Jaehyung Park LANL Team Members: Rangachary Mukundan, Siddharth Komini Babu, Xiaoxiao Qiao ORNL Team Members: Dave Cullen, Erin Creel, Haoran Yu, Jefferey Baxter, Shawn Reeves, Michael Zachman, Harry Meyer, Michael Kirka, Christopher Ledford INL Team Members: Richard Boardman, Dong Ding, Lucun Wang, Jeremy Hartwigsen, Gary Groenewold PNNL Team Members: Olga Marina, Jamie Holladay, Chris Coyle, Kerry Meinhardt, Dan Edwards, Matt Olszta, Nathan Canfield, Lorraine Seymour, Nathanael Royer, Jie Bao, Brian Koeppel LLNL Team Members: Brandon Wood, Joel Berry, Penghao Xiao, Tim Hsu, Namhoon Kim NETL Team Members: Greg Hackett NIST Affiliate Team Members: Daniel Hussey and David Jacobson. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 4
Relevance – 2020’s Decade of Hydrogen https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articl es/2021-03-02/hydrogen-is-jump-ball- in-global-clean-energy-race-kerry-says https://www.france24.com/en/live- news/20210331-the-global-race-to- develop-green-hydrogen https://hydrogencouncil.com/en/ Now is the time for hydrogen and the “global race” is on H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 5
Relevance – H2NEW connection to H2@Scale • Making, storing, moving and using H2 more efficiently are the main H2@Scale pillars and all are needed. • Making H2 is the inherently obvious, first step to spur the wide-ranging benefits of the H2@Scale vision. • Electrolysis has most competitive economics and balances increasing renewable generation challenges. • Timeframe is short, competition intense, coordinated effort critical for domestic Illustrative example, not comprehensive https://www.energy.gov/eere/fuelcells/h2-scale competitiveness. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 6
Relevance/Approach – H2NEW focus • A comprehensive, concerted effort focused on overcoming technical barriers to enable, affordable, reliable and efficient electrolyzers to achieve
Approach – Consortium Structure and Support Posters Director (LTE) • Task Based Structure Split between: FOA Projects Stakeholder H2NEW Co- Bryan Pivovar Advisory Director (HTE) Outreach Deputy Director (LTE) Deputy Director (LTE) • Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE), 75%: Board (SAB) Richard Durability and AST Integration and Protocol Data Boardman Development and Validation Validation – Task 1 Durability (P196a) Debbie Myers Nem Danilovic – Task 2 Performance (P196b) – Task 3 Scale-up (P196c) Task 1 Liasons for Task 2 Liaisons for LTE Performance Task 3 Liasons for LTE Scale Up LTE Durability – Task 3c Analysis (P196d) S. Alia, R. Mukundan G. Bender, A. Weber M. Ulsh, D. Wood • High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE), 25%: – Task 5 Durability (P196e) – Task 6 Characterization (P196f) – Task 8 Modeling (P196g) See associated AMR posters for additional details on Approach, Accomplishments, and Future Work H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 8
Relevance: Hydrogen Levelized Cost (PEM Centric) LTE Tasks Structured to address key issues of Performance, Cost and Durability in order to achieve
Relevance: Stack Costs (PEM Centric) Stack Targets Status 2023 2025 Cell (A/cm2@1.9V) 2.0 2.5 3.0 Efficiency (%) 66 68 70 Lifetime (khr) 60 70 80 Degradation (mV/khr) 3.2 2.75 2.25 Capital Cost ($/kW) 350 200 100 PGM loading (mg/cm2) 4 1 0.5 H2NEW highly focused on decreasing stack costs. Improved fabrication and thrifting of materials will lead to lower costs, higher operating currents, and scalable manufacturing processes. Focus of H2NEW Tasks addresses stack cost reduction based on operating current, CCM cost reductions, and manufacturing processes H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 11
Approach: Select LTE Milestones* Milestone Name/Description Due Date Type Status Work with HFTO to establish Stakeholder Advisory Board (SAB) and Accelerated Stress Test Working Group 12/31/2020 QPM Complete (ASTWG). – All Labs Finalize standard, state-of-the-art MEA material set, fabrication process, and/or source to be utilized in baseline 12/31/2020 QPM Complete studies including those for durability, performance, and scale-up/integration – All Labs Identify parameter space and experimental matrix that support the model needs of the consortium with regards to 3/31/2021 QPM Complete in-situ, ex-situ, and in-operando experiments. Labs – NREL, LBNL, ANL. Assess the impact of the stress tests on electrode, membrane, and PTL through voltage loss breakdown and use ex- situ characterization to identify degradation mechanisms and support AST development. Determine initial stressors 6/30/2021 QPM On Track to be investigated in detail for potential to accelerate specific degradation mechanisms. Labs – NREL, LBNL, ANL, LANL. Establish and validate single cell performance testing protocols on SOA MEAs with PGM loading of
Approach: Operating Strategy Existing Systems Future Systems Storage Refill Mode Renewable Following System Supplied Load Load 100% 100% Off/Idle Off/Idle • Steady state operation Time Time • Turn system on at certain vessel pressure • Follow renewable energy supply • Refill system at 100% system power • Maybe cap high and low performance • Switch system to off or idle to minimize degradation H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 13
Approach: State-of-the-Art Existing Systems** Future Systems • 2V @ 2A/cm2 • 2V @ ≥ 2A/cm2 • 2-3 mg/cm2 PGM • Thinner membranes catalyst loading on • Lower loadings anode & cathode • ≥ 80k hours • 60k – 80k hours in • Supply following commercial units • Renewable & Grid • Niche applications integrated – Life support applications – Industrial H2 – Wind – Power plants for – Solar cooling – Nuclear • $3.7/kg H2 production* • $2/kg H2 production* *High volume projection: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/10/f37/fcto-progress-fact-sheet-august-2017.pdf ** K.Ayers, AMR Presentation PD094, 06/2014 H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 14
Approach: LTE Tasks • Durability (Task 1, P196a) – Establish fundamental degradation mechanisms – Develop accelerated stress tests – Determine cost, performance, durability tradeoffs – Develop mitigation • Performance (Task 2, P196b) – Benchmark performance – Novel diagnostic development and application – Cell level models and loss characterization • Scale-up (Task 3, P196a) – Transition to mass manufacturing – Correlate processing with performance and durability – Guide efforts with systems and technoeconomic analysis (Task 3c, P196d) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 15
Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE) Task 3c: Analysis (more content in AMR Poster P196d)
Relevance/Approach: Analysis Task Overview Performance System cost • This task leverages expertise in modeling (ANL) modeling (NREL) system cost and performance modeling from NREL and ANL to benchmark H2NEW cost, durability, and performance Experimental research targets • Experimental and analysis capabilities form a crucial Electrolyzer feedback loop for identifying cost, barriers and validating progress durability, and towards H2NEW targets performance targets H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 17
Accomplishment: Developing a Reference PEM Electrolysis System by Building upon ANL-Developed Design Sample Parasitic Loads • GCTool model for accurate representation of the system layout, and BOP components and flows Mechanical BOP kWh/kg-H 2 • Model based losses for H2 losses because of H2/O2 crossover, H2 purge (LPHS), and O2 removal Water Pumps 0.10 (DeO2) Radiator Fan 0.71 Cooling Tower 0.02 • Parasitic loads: rectifier/transformer, chiller, TSA dryer (regeneration and blower) TSA Dryer System DeO2 Electrical Heater 0.14 Regen Electrical Heater 0.19 Tail Gas H2 Blower 0.00 Electrical BOP Rectifier/Transformer 3.69 Hydrogen Loss DeH2 0.22 Crossover H2 and O2 0.43 Total 5.51 H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 18
Accomplishment: Models Contextualize Advances in Cell Components and Quantify Remaining Progress Needed To Achieve DOE Targets Stack Performance Targets 70% voltage efficiency 97.5% current efficiency V/I target: 1.79 V at 3 A/cm2, 300 psi, 0.4 mgIr/cm2 anode catalyst loading Target ASR and OER Activity • OER Activity: Shorting-corrected current density Target H2 Crossover at 20oC at iR-corrected 1.45 V, 80oC, 1 atm; Reference Example Target Application to PFSA • Stack efficiency = Voltage efficiency (70%) x value: ~100 A/gIr for 0.4 mgIr/cm2, 60 mV/dec Membrane Current efficiency (97.5%) Tafel slope • With the status 100 A/gIr OER activity, it is more • Reference H2 crossover for N211 in fuel cells: • Reference Values of ASR N211 membrane: 20 difficult to meet the current efficiency target 3 mA/cm2.atm at 100% RH. mΩ.cm2 at 100% RH, 80oC, 0.1 S/cm conductivity than V/I target • Meeting current efficiency target at 80oC with Example contact resistance: 12 mΩ.cm2 • With 2 to 3.5 mil PFSA membranes and 5x N212 membrane requires 40% reduction in H2 • Possible to meet V/I target at 80oC with N212 OER activity, possible to meet both V/I and crossover membrane and status OER activity current efficiency targets 80 1.5 4 97.5% Current H2 Crossover at 20°C, mA/cm2.atm Efficiency Line Membrane Thickness, mil 70 90°C 3 80°C V/I Target Line, ASR, mΩ.cm2 1.0 60 500 A/gIr OER Activity 60°C 2 V/I Target Line, 50 LIr: 0.4 mg/cm2 100 A/gIr OER Activity 0.5 i: 3 A/cm2 40 1 E: 1.79 V P: 300 psi 97.5% Current Efficiency 30 0.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 60 70 80 90 60 70 80 90 OER Activity, A/gIr Stack T, °C Stack Temperature, °C H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 19
Accomplishment: Duty cycle implications for ASTs LMP heatmaps can give insight into potential operating strategies On-off cycle duration and frequency can help support AST development. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 20
Accomplishment: Hydrogen cost impacts Location Marginal Pricing (LMP) for Both capital costs and electricity electricity can be used to explore prices critical to HLC. operating strategies H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 21
Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE) Task 1: Durability (more content in AMR Poster P196a)
Approach: Task 1 (Durability) Operando cell studies Ex situ component studies Accelerated Stress Tests Determine key stressors Membrane a) 2 Limits of durability and the impact Orders of magnitude 1.9 accelerating degradation acceleration of component 1.8 of different membrane chemistry E [V] 1.7 Identify relevant degradation Variables: Side chain, equivalent degradation rates 1.6 mechanisms at the component weight, pre-aging, reinforcements, Assess cost and durability trade- 1.5 1.4 recombination layers and/or offs, accelerate materials 0 15 30 45 60 level Time [s] radical scavenging development, MEA integration, Impact of seal area/edges, and optimal operating strategies for LTEs pressure 2025 Understanding Understanding and Evaluation Solutions 80,000 h 2.24 µV/h Mitigation Strategies 0.5 mgPGM/cm2 Catalyst Develop and implement operational, materials, and cell design-based degradation Aqueous electrochemical cell coupled with mitigation strategies ICP-MS Coordinate with AST development, Quantify losses associated with Potential and potential profile dependence of technoeconomic analysis, and cell fabrication different operating conditions the dissolution of anode catalysts tasks Correlation with oxidation state In-cell Diagnostics: Ex situ component characterization: Voltage loss SEM, TEM, X-ray spectroscopy, scattering, tomography, I-V curves, impedance spectroscopy, breakdown/modeling microelectrode studies cyclic voltammetry, fluoride emission H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water S. M. Alia, S. Stariha, R. L. Borup, J. Electrochem. Soc. 2019, 166.; https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review19/ta022_alia_2019_o.pdf 2019. 23
Approach: Cell Aging Studies Component-level Stressors/Variables Initial work plan: Anode Membrane Porous transport layer • Operating the rainbow stack and to Catalyst loading Membrane Corrosion protection thickness material start studies evaluating lower potential limits to separate the Hydrogen crossover rate Compression Thickness impact of sudden potential Steady-state potential Differential Structure changes from high potential in pressure catalyst layer degradation. Voltage sweep rate/profile Pressure cycling Potential exposure • Continued upgrading of electrolysis Voltage limits for cycling Mechanical stress Cycling frequency testing capability and increased Length of holds at voltage Local dehydration Redox cycling throughput through new test limits equipment and expanding Temperature Temperature Temperature capability of current equipment. In-cell Diagnostics: Ex situ component characterization: Voltage loss I-V curves, impedance spectroscopy, SEM, TEM, X-ray spectroscopy, scattering, breakdown/modeling cyclic voltammetry, fluoride emission tomography, etc. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 24
Progress: Cell Aging Studies Intermittent Operation Anode catalyst layer stressors: a) 2 • Lower anode catalyst loading, higher 1.9 cycling frequency significantly increase performance loss due to 1.8 E [V] intermittent operation 1.7 • Sweep rate less critical 1.6 • Simulated crossover reduces near- 1.5 surface iridium, dramatically increases 1.4 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 dissolution and loss i [A cm‒2] Hydrogen Crossover Catalyst aggregation, increased interfacial tearing H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 25
Progress: Cell Aging Studies ) 2 4 2.08 2.2 Voltage Current 2.06 3 2 Conditioning 2.04 1 day Voltage (V), Current Density (A/cm Duration Voltage at 3 A (V) 2 1.8 Voltage (V) 2.02 1 1.6 2 20 mV 0 1.98 1.4 Mar 11 Mar 12 Mar 13 Mar 14 Mar 15 Mar 11 Mar 13 Mar 15 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 2 Time Test Time Current Density (A/cm ) Baseline efforts: Conditioning Processes 10 -3 1.7 V Hold • Developing a consistent start point for 15 Kinetic durability testing between users, labs ), Voltage (V) 0.9 resistance • Evaluating variations in catalyst layer 0.89 10 decreases formation and membrane preconditioning, ) 2 0.88 2 5 cm their impact on conditioning time and 0.87 performance 0 Time = 64.1 min -Z'' ( 0.86 Current Density (A/cm Voltage Time = 299.1 min • Separating losses to evaluate how 0.85 Current -5 Time = 534.0 min Time = 769.0 min performance changes occur during 0.84 HFR varies conditioning 200 400 600 0.155 0.16 0.165 0.17 0.175 0.18 0.185 Time (min) Z' ( cm 2 ) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 26
Approach: Ex-situ characterization of MEAs/components/interfaces • Summary: optical, electron microscopy, and X-ray Technique Facility X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy APS, ALS characterization techniques to assess changes in: Ultra-small, small, and wide-angle X-ray APS: USAXS, SAXS, WAXS Anode morphology, pore size, catalyst scattering ALS: SAXS and WAXS aggregate/agglomerate size, ionomer distribution Micro and Nano-X-ray computed ALS, APS tomography Anode catalyst oxidation state, atomic structure, and Micro X-ray computed tomography LANL, NREL Benchtop migration ALS, APS Neutron imaging Tomography NIST PTL coating degradation and titanium passivation Focused ion beam and scanning electron LANL, ORNL Membrane thinning, tearing and pinholes, interfacial microscopy Scanning transmission electron swelling, and delamination microscopy ORNL Microelectrode measurements of interface between catalyst Scanning electron microscopy ANL, LANL, ORNL and ionomer to study ionomer degradation and effect on X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy ORNL water transport Optical microscopy ANL, ORNL • First year characterization development efforts: Brunauer–Emmett–Teller ANL, LANL, NREL, ORNL Mercury intrusion porosimetry LANL Automated image acquisition and analysis methods for tracking dissolved metal nanoparticles through the X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy ANL, LANL, NREL membrane Ion Chromatography LANL Absolute quantification of metal loss from electrodes using Inductively-couple plasma-mass ANL, NREL the Z-method spectrometry Identical location STEM H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 27
Progress: Ex-situ characterization of MEAs/components/interfaces Identical-Location Scanning Transmission Electron Microscopy Capability Developed and Demonstrated Test conditions: Protocol: 30s • Catalyst: Alfa Aesar IrO2 provided by NREL 420 cycles 0.5s 2.00 VvsRHE • 0.05M H2SO4, Ar-saturated, Room temperature 1.45 VvsRHE 30 s Area 1: BOL 420 cycles BOL 420 cycles Electrochemical IrO2 IrO2 performance of cell validated 80 IrOx_CV_BOL 60 40 Current /µA 20 0 -20 -40 -60 0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 E vs. RHE /V Ar-saturated 0.05M H2SO4, 50mV/s, 5th cycle. EDS analysis: BOL 420 Cycles Preconditioning: 0.05-1.3 VRHE, 200 mV/s, 40 cycles O/Ir atomic ratio 1.2 1.8 H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 28
Approach: Accelerated Stress Test Development Utilize understanding of degradation mechanisms to develop ASTs for Electrolyzers • Develop a duty cycle representative of electrolyzer operation while capturing all degradation mechanisms Dynamic load cycling Open circuit testing (Load off) going through Ir/IrOx redox High current operation (> 3A/cm2) High voltage operation (> 2.5V) Pressure cycling Presence of contaminants (like Fe) • Develop component specific ASTs to evaluate the durability of individual components in a reasonable time period (1 week to 1 month) Define conditions; Set targets based on correlation with duty cycle Catalysts : Suitability for dynamic operation. Ability to go through redox. Membranes : Durability under dynamic conditions; effect of pressure differentials and contaminants PTLs : Resistance to oxidation (Interface resistance and hydrophobicity changes) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 29
Progress: Accelerated Stress Test Development ASTWG Priority list (1=highest priority) • Electrolyzer duty cycle identified as #1 priority • Needs to incorporate dynamic load cycling and Task Name Average Std Dev Ir/IrOx redox cycling • Completing baseline materials and testing protocols Develop Electrolyzer Duty cycle that captures all relevant stressors at the MEA • Initiating testing matrix for AST development level 1.375 0.484 • Establish degradation rate at 80 oC: Square wave Anode Catalyst AST 1.875 0.599 potential from 0V (no load, ambient) to 1.6V (up to PTL AST 3.9375 0.634 30 bar). 15mins at each potential. Both pressure Membrane AST 3.125 0.927 and Redox cycling to capture all degradation modes Catalyst layer ionomer AST 5.5 1.118 Cathode Catalyst AST 6.375 1.494 • Monitor pol curves, CVs, and EIS during test and Bi-polar plate AST 6.1875 1.058 also fluoride emission from both anode and cathode Stressor Name • BOL and EOL particle sizes, membrane thickness, membrane mechanical properties, PTL Dynamic load cycling 2.625 1.932 hydrophobicity and porosity Shut down/Start up. Allowing Ir/IrOx redox 2.25 1.713 Future Work: High current operation (> 3A/cm2) 4.3125 1.919 High voltage operation (> 2.5V) 3.3125 1.434 • Parametric study to quantify influence of individual Pressure cycling 5.25 1.089 stressors Presence of contaminants (like Fe) 4.25 1.198 • Working to incorporate other loss mechanisms in Hydrogen cross-over 5.875 1.615 conjunction with the AST working group H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 30
Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE) Task 2: Performance and Benchmarking (more content in AMR Poster P196b)
Approach: Task 2 Performance and Benchmarking NEL 2016 Status • Commercial MEAs Spray coated CCM Status 2020 2 mg/cm2 total loading are “overdesigned” Circumvent Edisonian • Academic MEAs have with high catalyst Approach demonstrated loadings as loadings and thick low as 0.05 mg/cm2 membranes • Translation to high- • Poor understanding throughput MEAs is not of structure, Commercial materials: feasible without an interfaces and 0.4 mgIr/cm2 *on 7 mil Nafion understanding of underlying performance 2 mil membrane properties and function N. Danilovic, ECS Transactions, 75 (2016) 395 impacts Ti PTL and Pt coating Z. Taie, ACS AM&I, 12 (2020) 52701 2025 Understanding Structure Property Relationships Rational 77% LHV @ 3 A/cm2 Solutions 0.5 mgPGM/cm2 Performance & In- Situ Advanced In- Situ Ex-Situ Diagnostics In-Operando Characterization Characterization Characterization Cell Level Modeling Develop and utilize ex- Develop and utilize Utilize cell level modeling to Utilize in situ characterization Develop and situ diagnostic techniques operando techniques to understand underlying techniques to evaluate utilize advanced to extract component identify performance and mechanisms and to guide in materials and components. electrochemical level parameters and to durability limiting design and optimization of Establish protocols and diagnostics. determine performance phenomena in operating cells and components benchmark across institutions. impacting characteristics. cells. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 32
Approach: State-of-Art Performance Diagnostics • Utilize and establish measurement methods and test procedures • Apply methods to H2NEW • Develop reproducible analysis pathways for community • Study phenomena at Conditioning / Break In HFR free Performance Kinetic Performance interfaces, coatings, materials and operating conditions • Iterate between models and experiment Voltage Loss Breakdown VI-Curves Detailed HFR & Impedance Information Add EIS H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 33
Approach: Development & Utilization of Advanced Diagnostics • Enable and conduct the detailed study of phenomena at interfaces, coatings, materials and operating conditions Examples: Segmented Cell Internal Voltage Sensor Cell Hydrogen Crossover Sensing • High throughput • Separation of losses in-situ • Application of novel Ex-situ & • High throughput • Combinatorial Research • EIS tool to study interfaces In-operando methods degradation studies using segmented cell or rainbow stack • Combinatorial material testing • Through plane voltage distribution and potential measurements • Transport and crossover processes H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 34
Approach: Development & Utilization of Ex-Situ Diagnostics • Enable and conduct the detailed study of material properties and degradation phenomena • Characterize interfaces, material composition and morphology Examples: Ionic/electronic conductivity SEM, TEM, FIB-SEM & Nano-CT for PTLs • Structure impact on conductivity and transport • Coating defects & oxide thickness • Coating penetration • Pore structure & pore size distribution • Nanoscale morphology FIB-SEM & Tomography for Catalyst Layers Corrosion & Passivation • Inform and exchange info Before Afte between capabilities and r with all tasks • Support holistic understanding H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 35
Approach: Development & Utilization of Advanced Characterization Techniques • Operando study of reaction, transport and flow phenomena in cell & at interfaces • Characterization of impact of material choice, composition and morphology Examples: In situ Micro-XCT Cell Operando characterization X-ray Scattering Neutron Imaging Tomography Ti felt PTL • Water & oxygen transport through cell components and their impacts on performance • Real time water In situ X-ray Spectroscopy Cells Advanced High-Resolution Microscopy dynamics & degradation phenomena Fresh AST • Hydrophobicity loss tracked locally • Catalyst-ionomer interaction across Catalyst-ionomer structures and distribution length scales H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 36
Approach: Multi-physics electrolyzer model 2-D Cell Level Multiphysics Models • Provide relevant • Use operando parametric studies to obtain component level phenomenological properties data to guide the modeling analysis • Validate models by generating physical • Cell diagnostics to phenomena at the validate predictive component level, cell optimization and diffusivity shown mitigation strategies H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 37
Accomplishment – Operando Diagnostics • Q2 QPM: Complete cell design and validation of a neutron imaging cell to be used with the high-resolution imaging detector at NIST. Cell performance in imaging hardware within ±10% of performance in a 25 cm2 cell ⇒ Performance validated to be within 10% ⇒ Some HFR differences seen due to differences in balance of cell components H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 38
Accomplishment – Baseline Materials Selection • Evaluation of Anode PTL materials 2.2 High loaded MEA (previous work) Low loaded MEA (H2NEW) underway with Uncoated Ir coated 420 2.4 Uncoated EdgeTech PTL Uncoated Mott PTL – “state-of-the-art” MEAs 2.0 Ir coated EdgeTech PTL Performance Pt coated Mott PTL 360 2.2 HFR-free – “Future Generation” MEAs HFR [mΩ cm2] 1.8 HFR Voltage [V] Voltage [V] 2.0 (FuGeMEA) 300 1.6 • Two distinct PTL architectures 240 1.8 1.4 – Felt material 180 1.6 1.2 – Sintered material 120 1.4 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 • Various PTL parameters -2 Current Density [A cm ] Current Density [A cm-2] – Coating/uncoated • Interplay between MEA loading and PTL confirmed • In-house • MEAs with low loadings have higher sensitivity towards • At supplier functionality of PTL / catalyst layer interface – Thickness • Coatings significantly improve cell resistance – Porosity – Improvement of interfacial resistance – Improvement of thermal conduction within cell H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 39
Low Temperature Electrolysis (LTE) Task 3: Manufacturing, Scale-up and Integration (more content in AMR Poster P196c)
Approach: Manufacturing Scale Up Spray Coating Slot Die Coating R2R Coating • Dilute ink • Viscous ink • Viscous Ink • Homogenous Ir • Heterogenous Ir distribution • Very high throughput distribution • Serves as a model • Translate subscale • Low high throughput deposition learnings throughput technique Understanding and Evaluation 2025 Understanding/Legacy Model/Scalable Fabrication Engineered @Scale/H2NEW 100 $/kW Ink Composition Ink Mixing Electrode Structure/Function Solutions Substrates Study the impact of ink Study the impact of Impact of substrate type and composition, solids mixing on the ink deposition method on content, I/C ratio and stability and structure and function of the solvent types agglomeration Impact of ink, deposition resulting catalyst layers. Ink Rheology technique on the catalyst layer Downselect based on structure, ionomer distribution, technoeconomic and Study the relationships catalyst distribution, manufacturing between ink agglomerate size on considerations. composition, rheology and the of ink performance and durability. rheology on H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 41
Approach: Integration and Components Porous Transport Layer Interfacial Layers • Evaluate the impact Scalable and Engineered of additive/ Structures • Evaluate microporous layers • Design scalable PTL commercially on the properties structures with available PTLs and function of tailored porosity, • Mechanical and PTLs tailored interface and transport properties Bekaert Mott • Evaluate the PTL wetting properties Commercial Commercial • Performance and interface topology Ti fiber Ti particle durability T. Schuler et al, Adv. Energy Mat., Understanding and 10 (2020), 1903216 Evaluation on function of PTL 2025 Understanding/Commercial Model/Interfaces Solutions Engineered 100 $/kW Mechanical Properties Coatings Interface Structures Two Phase Transport Fabrication Leonard et al. Solar Fuels C. Liu et al, Adv Energy (10.1039/c9se00364a) P. Satjaritanun et al., iScience, 23, Mat., 11 (2021), 2002926 (2020) 101783. Study PTL mechanical Study impact and Study the coherence of and properties. Study the transport through the Study the transport of Use 3D printing and type of corrosion PTL/membrane PTL/membrane interface water and oxygen tape casting to make resistant coatings. interfacial mechanical and impact on performance through the PTL. PTLs with tailored Investigate non-PGM properties. alternatives defects. and durability. characteristics. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 42
Accomplishment: Titanium PTL/MPL Additive Manufacturing • Layer-by-layer electron beam melting process performed at E-Beam Fusing of Metal Particles ORNL’s Manufacturing Demonstration Facility (MDF) – Metal particles melted by e-beam to form a 3D porous structure – Adjusting the e-beam focus and movement pattern allows the amount of void space (porosity) to be tuned. Tomography of fabricated PTL • 55 mm x 55 mm x 1 mm proof of concept structures manufactured from Ti64 with 25% porosity in the highlighted center region of interest measured by micro CT – Ti64 behaves similarly to pure Ti in manufacturing, but the Al and V impurities make it unsuitable for use in a PTL. • Next steps: determine upper porosity limit and attempt to make porosity-graded PTLs using grade 2 (commercially pure) Ti H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 43
Accomplishment: Ti PTL Structure Function Characterization • 20um Fiber diameter Bekeart PTLs, varying thickness at 56% porosity and varying porosity at fixed thickness • N117, Fixed catalyst loading of 0.06 mgIr/cm2 *Iryna Zenyuk at UCI • Too porous is bad because the interface suffers • ~50% dense is optimal • Too thick and too thin is bad as well (maybe mechanical), • 150 um optimal • To inform future PTL design Fixed Thickness Fixed Porosity H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 44
Responses to Previous Year Reviewers’ Comments • Not Applicable, first year of project H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 45
Collaborations and Coordination (LTE) Leverage across other Consortium: LTE Strategic Advisory Board Members HydroGEN 2.0 (HFTO) R2R (AMO) Million Mile Fuel Cell Truck (HFTO) ElectroCAT (HFTO) Kathy Ayers Cortney Chris Thomas Jack Mark VP R&D Mittelsteadt Senior Brouwer Mathias Nel Hydrogen VP Electrolyzer Technical Professor Consultant Technology Supervisor U.C. Irvine retired (GM) Plug Power 3M Numerous industrial, academia, and international interactions: Select group of advisors representing OEMs, tier 1 (IEA, ASTWG, materials suppliers, informal collaborations) suppliers, analysis and manufacturing interests. External Facing Website Being Established: h2new.energy.gov Initial effort piloted by National Labs (see Slide 4 for full list of project participants by institution), have widely coordinated with other research institutions and industry, expect academia and industry to engage further through FOAs and collaborative research. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 46
Remaining Challenges/Proposed Future Work (LTE) (Refer to P149a,b,c & d for more detail at Task Level) Task 1 (Durability): Aging Studies; Mitigation Strategies; Ex-situ Characterization of MEAs/components/interfaces; Ex-situ Catalyst Durability; Ex-situ Membrane Durability; Accelerated Stress Test Development Task 2 (Performance): Performance benchmarking, baselining, validation; Cell performance testing in support of electrode development; Ex-situ studies focused on performance factors; Cell level model development Task 3 (Scale-up): MEA fabrication, Interface engineering (inks, electrodes, cell integration and interfaces); Components (porous transport layers, recombination layers) Task 3c (Analysis): Performance, manufacturing, and system models; Durability factors; Energy system integration Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 47
Summary: H2NEW LTE Degradation and Accelerated Stress Test (ASTs) Probing of single stressor demo established for degradation pathways correlating with AST Rainbow stack for durability AST Working Group Established Operando cell and ex situ Mitigation Strategies component studies To be informed by degradation and AST Operando neutron diffraction Identical location microscopy cell commissioned and on-line ICMPS Understanding Discretionary funding Understanding demonstrated for studying and Evaluation allocated to operando degradation Stack Targets Status 2023 2025 tomography Cell (A/cm @1.9V) 2 2.0 2.5 3.0 Task 2: Performance: Structure-Property Relations to Optimized Performance Efficiency (%) 66 68 70 Lifetime (khr) 60 70 80 Baseline MEA Cell Modeling Degradation (mV/khr) 3.2 2.75 2.25 Identified parameter space and experimental Crosstask team Capital Cost ($/kW) 350 200 100 matrix that support the model needs of the established PGM loading (mg/cm2) 4 1 0.5 consortium with regards to in-situ, ex-situ, and in- common MEA, TEA, Systems Analysis operando experiments testing and prep Performance, manufacturing, and Identified and system analysis is underway and tools sourced PTL Inks, are being developed and implemented catalyst layers, porous transport layers Identified Operating Strategy that Study of PTL structure property demonstrated Minimizes Cost for Several Electrolyzer relations initiated Concentrated ink baselining Costs Identified and sourced PTL Identified and sourced PTL between 3 labs Initial Input to Stack Performance Feasibility of PTL fabrication via Targets 3-D printing and tape casting Cell to system level performance model H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 48
H2NEW Activities: High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) Richard Boardman, H2NEW Deputy Director, and HTE Lead
Relevance/Impact • H2NEW-HTE will address HTE cell and stack components performance and durability to understand degradations and enable manufacturable electrolyzers that meet required cost, durability, and performance targets, to enable $2/kg hydrogen. • H2NEW focuses on durability and lifetime of SOEC cells and stacks • H2NEW is a tightly focused, highly coordinated investigation harnessing extensive experimental testing, multiscale modeling and detailed materials characterization DOE HTE Targets – National labs are ideal for this critical work – in aggregate, combination of world-class experimental, analytical, and modeling tools, with the ability to freely share research findings. – The array of capabilities needed to understand and mitigate degradation does not exist at a single laboratory H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 50
Relevance: HTE Motivation, Barriers, and Opportunity HTE – an exceptionally attractive technology for H2 production a. O2- -conducting SOECs have evolved to a reasonable state of maturity -- high performance in H2 production efficiency, steam utilization, electrical efficiency & utilizing heat to offset demands for electricity. Metal-supported o-SOECs have potential for improved mechanical stability. b. Operating characteristics that are highly compatible with power plant integration c. HTE has the potential to achieve DOE’s cost target for H2 of < $2/kg Barriers a. High performance is inversely correlated with durability. 1) Degradation occurs at both anode and cathode interfaces, exacerbated by operation at high production conditions. 2) Degradation phenomena are well known. Mechanisms are not. 3) Ability to rationalize, predict and control is immature. b. o-SOEC durability plays a major role in the overall cost of hydrogen production -- Cell degradation limits lifetimes c. Capital Cost is estimated to be higher than desired d. Stack Costs are an important contributor to the overall economics of H2 production Opportunity If degradation mechanisms were well understood, composition and architecture could be optimized, and operation tuned to achieve extended lifetimes, overcoming a key barrier to realizing cost targets H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 51
Relevance: H2NEW HTE Performance Targets • Performance and Durability 2021 NOAK Plant: Electricity Cost- $30/MWhe are the primary factors to Stacks~ $155/kWe; BOP~ $550/kWe reducing levelized cost of hydrogen (LCH) Performance • Increase life from 30,000 to & Durability 80,000 • Increase conversion O2 Sales efficiency: – Reduce gas purification and H2 recycle costs (i.e. BOP) – improve thermodynamic efficiency using high temperature process heat • Optimize stack design • Co-produce oxygen H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 52
Approach: Select HTE Milestones* Milestone Name/Description Due Date Type Status Develop revised 5-year stack performance, durability and cost stack-level HTE targets to be achieved by H2NEW 12/31/2020 QPM Complete Identify standard cell compositions for baseline performance and durability testing. Identify supply chain. 12/31/2020 QPM Complete Test protocol development – standard operating conditions, stressors, initial test matrix for AST 03/31/2021 QPM Complete Dynamic cycling protocol specification 06/30/2021 QPM On Track Complete button cell testing under standard operating conditions 6/30/2021 QPM On Track Demonstrate that two stressors cause reproducible and accelerated degradation in button cells 9/30/2021 M On Track Complete initial dynamic cycling testing, achieve repeatability and degradation under AST conditions 9/30/2021 M On Track Demonstrate capability for 3D / enhanced 2D resolution of microstructure of HTE cell 12/31/2021 QPM On Track Develop concepts for improved (10%) cell performance at 1.28 V 3/31/2022 M On track Develop in operando test stand for button cells and planar cells 3/31/2022 QPM On Track Decision: Development & validation of ASTs for HTE-SOECs – 3 component-level ASTs and measure performance losses. Criteria: Verify that at least one AST captures and accelerates degradation occurring over long time 3/31/2022 Go/No-Go On Track frames via spectroscopic, microscopic and electrochemical performance measures. Performers: All labs. *For complete list, see associated AMR posters for additional details H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 53
Approach: H2NEW HTE Program Flow Understanding Rational Solutions H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 54
High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) Task 5: Durability Testing and AST Development (more content in AMR Poster P196E)
Approach: Experimental Investigation to AST • Define cell materials, architectures, configurations, and sizes • Identify button cell vendor/supplier – button cells – planar cells • Define standard operating conditions: temperature, gas compositions, current/voltage • Test button cells under standard operations • Determine degradation mechanisms • Identify stressors for Accelerated Stress Testing (AST) – Develop protocols: matrix with incrementally aggressive conditions – Round robin replicates to ensure confidence • Determine AST degradation, compare to standard operating conditions • Graduate to planar cells – standard operations – AST matrix H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 56
Technical Accomplishments: Standard Cells Identified • Composition identified: Ni-YSZ | YSZ | GDC | LSCF-SDC – Button cells initially, smaller cell area active area is 2-4 cm2 active area is 10-25 – Graduate to planar cells, larger cell area, 10-25 cm2, cm2 for direct comparison to button cells • PNNL fabrication: – explicitly known compositions – high quality control – adjustable production size, with invariant composition and architecture – high volume, supplying INL, LBNL, & NREL H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 57
Technical Accomplishments: Electrochemical Testing • Significant suite of test stands assembled – > 15 PNNL – 11 INL by 06/21 – 2 LBNL • Screening commercial, • 750 - 800oC PNNL-fabricated, cells • H2/H2O = 50/50 • 1.3 v • Results • 600 – 2,800 h – Commercial cells display poor performance reproducibility – PNNL-fabricated cells performed with greatly improved I-V precision H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 58
Technical Accomplishments: Post-Test Characterization Commercial Cells • Sr migration through the ceria barrier layer, reaction with YSZ to form SrZrO3 • LSM delamination observed in all cells tested • Ni/YSZ did not exhibit any significant changes Oxygen Electrode Hydrogen Electrode Cell-related degradation mechanisms previously reported: GDC YSZ – Hydrogen Electrode • Coarsening Ni/YSZ • Migration • Si poisoning – Oxygen Electrode • SrZrO3 • Delamination • Cr, S poisoning SEM images EDS compositions H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 59
Technical Accomplishments: Dynamic Cycling R&D SOEC testing typically at fixed conditions (V, I, T, P), but, anticipated operation is highly dynamic Metal-supported SOEC, air/50% humidified C. Graves, J.V.T. Høgh, K. Agersted, X. Sun, M. hydrogen Chen et al., July 2014, Department of Energy F. Shen, R. Wang, M.C. Tucker, Journal of Conversion & Storage, Technical University of Power Sources, 474 (2020) 228618 Denmark 700°C 50% steam 0.33 A/cm2 Literature: – Cycling power (P, V, or I) does not cause degradation; cycling outside normal range is not studied – Steam content cycling is not well studied, but is relevant to intermittent or variable operation – Small variations in P, T, Ni reduction/oxidation not expected to impact degradation; large variations cause catastrophic failure and so are not useful for AST Ongoing: – Variables chosen for initial cycling in FY21: steam content, and power – Test standard cells under dynamic conditions – Assess viability as an Accelerated Stress Test H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 60
High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) Task 7: Advanced Characterization (more content in AMR Poster P196F)
Approach – Multi-Lab, Multi-Capability to Identify Composition, Microscale Morphology Changes Objectives • Identify HTE Cell Degradation & Failure Mechanisms • Void formation / cation migration / new phase formation / Ni coarsening / Zr redox • Discern order of failures – relative kinetics Approach • Engage materials analysis horsepower • conventional analysis at NREL, ANL, PNNL, LBNL • accelerator-driven analysis at SLAC, ANL remarkable level (including in situ, in operando experiments) of layer, phase • Transmission X-ray Microscopy (TXM) differentiation is • X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy (XAS) achievable • X-ray Diffraction (XRD) • Scanning electron microscopy / Energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 62
Technical Accomplishments – Cation Migration by TXM, XAS 3D Tomography (TXM) of HTE cell cycled 2D XAS map at the Fe edge (top) 300 H XAS spectra (bottom) Multi-Lab Attack INL synthesized and cycled HTE cells SNL fibbed sample to size NREL coordinated measurements w/ SLAC, conducted data analysis and interpretation Composition, Microstructure Alterations Unveiled • Void formation in GDC Fe migration into GDC seem in TXM • Iron oxide migration into 5 μm GDC layer seen in 2D XAS imaging • Potential correlation, possible causation wrt degradation H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 63
Technical Accomplishments – Formation of Gd/Fe-bearing phases Magnified XRD of 0 hrs Cell XRD Pattern Silver Negligible Intensity (Arb. Units) Nickel LCSF secondary phases YSZ GDC Fe2O3 in benchmark experiment Synchrotron XRD 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 • Total X-ray penetration 2 (at =0.7293Å) Magnified XRD of 300hrs Cell of cell, integrated XRD Pattern analysis of all layers Silver Pronounced Gd Intensity (Arb. Units) Nickel LCSF YSZ ferrite formation, XRD Results – cell cycled 300 hours GDC Fe2O3 after modest • GdxFeyOz formation (in blue) GdxFeyOz operation time • Potential correlation, possible causation with respect to degradation 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 2 (at =0.7293Å) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 64
High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) Task 8: Multiscale Modeling (more content in AMR Poster P196G)
Approach – Multiscale Modeling Objectives 1. Correlate operating conditions with degradation mechanisms 2. Develop tools for predicting durability and lifetime over long timeframes 3. Guide selection of accelerated stress testing (AST) conditions and protocols to achieve representative of long-term degradation under normal operating conditions Approach 1. Leverage advanced simulation capabilities and codes developed through HydroGEN and complementary DOE-funded activities at partner labs 2. Model validation via close coordination with experiment 3. High performance SOC modeling groups H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 66
Approach – Atomistics & Computational Thermodynamics Atomistics - Ab initio Computational Thermodynamics (CALPHAD) Unit cell compositions – e.g. YSZ, Interface Mapping phase stability as a f(composition) & phase energies, atom transport, reaction Correlate operating conditions, pathways & kinetics, electronic structure e.g. [p(O2)] ∝ current density YSZ (Y2O3- doped ZrO2) Micro- structure Red – O Light green – Zr Dark green – Y Computational spectroscopy – quantitative link from theory to experiment H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 67
Approach – Phase Field and Multiphysics Modeling Phase-field modeling Multiphysics Modeling Generating 3D microstructure Predict electrochemical performance vs Predict degradation phenomena, viz., microstructure, electromigration & diffusion coarsening & migration, phase (e-, e+, O2-), O2 partial pressures transformations, micro-fracture 3 Elements 3 Material Phases + Pore Degradation-Prone Microstructure Hotspots 0.46 Ni A: NiZr solid solution Zr B: Ni5Zr intermetallic Phase-field O C: ZrO2 (YSZ) simulation conditions D: Pore 0 Ni-Zr Uniquely Current microstructure Density ZrO2 dependent Fracture Quantitatively understand degradation mechanisms and controlling factors H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 68
Technical Accomplishments – Ni/YSZ Breakdown Driven by • Key Degradation: Ni/YSZ fuel electrode breakdown near the electrolyte Current Density Electrode Current density ≳ 0.6 A/cm2 NiFCC + ZrO2 log10[ p(O2) ] (bar) Thermodynamic instability Ni Degraded Structural changes NiFCC zone NiFCC + Ni5Zr YSZ ↑ ohmic resistance Electrolyte Interfacial separation Failure Zr/(Ni+Zr) p(O2) for ceramic phase reduction Improved Equilibriu NiFCC + ZrO2 YSZ m p(O2) thermo- dynamic log10[ p(O2) ] (bar) (Y2O3- [bar] doped ZrO2) accuracy Old ZrO2 ZrNi5 + O2 ZrO2 + 5Ni 5.0E-32 NiFCC NiFCC + Ni5Zr Oxidation Red – O Our ZrO2 ZrNi5 + O2 ZrO2 + 5Ni 5.05E-31 equilibria Light green – Zr Our YSZ (4/31)YNi5 + (28/31)ZrNi5 + O2 4.17E-31 shifted 10x Dark green – Y (2/31)Y2Zr14O31 + (160/31)Ni higher Zr/(Ni+Zr) H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 69
High Temperature Electrolysis (HTE) Summary and Conclusions
Collaboration and Coordination Task 5. Cell fabrication, operation, AST development PNNL, INL, LBNL • A highly coordinated, Task 6. Task integration and protocol validation SAB, INL interactive four-prong Task 7. Advanced characterization NREL, ANL, interfacing SLAC strategy – leveraging Task 8. Multiscale modeling LLNL, NETL, PNNL • leading expertise, Integration of Stacks and Balance of Plant Development and Verification capability at the National Labs • Stakeholder Advisory Board • Scott Swartz, Nexceris Integrated Stacks & Pilot Plant • Greg Tao, Chemtronergy Balance of Plant Demonstration 50-250 kWe Stack Assembly • John Pietras, St. Gobain Performance Testing • Peter Voorhees, Northwestern Stack Manufacturing • Scott Barnett, Northwestern Short Stack Testing • Xiao-Dong Zhou, University of 3-10 cells Louisiana-Lafayette • H2NEW HTE integration into H2NEW Composite Cells the research, development, Accelerated Stress Testing demonstration & deployment Materials Development HydroGEN horizon H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 71
Remaining Challenges and Barriers (HTE) (Refer to P196e,f & g for more detail at Task Level) Task 5: Durability Testing and AST Development i. AST development is a significant intellectual challenge – National Lab-worthy ii. Reconfiguring test stand capability with capacity commensurate with program needs is a near term challenge Task 6: Task Integration and Protocol Validation i. H2NEW will generate enormous volumes of data, that will present organization, validation, archival and communication challenges Task 7: Advanced Characterization i. Implementing HTE experiments operating at beam line user stations is not simple Task 8: Multiscale Modeling i. Degradation processes at the YSZ|GDC|LSCF-SDC interface are probably coupled in a non-linear fashion. Defining and modeling the mechanisms will be significantly more difficult than the Ni-YSZ|YSZ interface. A National Lab-worthy problem. H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 72
Proposed Future Work (HTE) (Refer to P196e,f & g for more detail at Task Level) Task 5: Durability Testing and AST Development i. Develop AST protocols that accelerate degradation, with fidelity to mechanisms functioning at standard operating conditions ii. Mature & deploy augmented testing capability sufficient to cover the parameter matrix and requisite Task 6: Task Integration and Protocol Validation i. Organize significant data volume, surmount archival, curation challenges ii. Ensure refined protocols are validated, widely available Task 7: Advanced Characterization i. Refine and implement in situ / in operando analyses at APS, SLAC ii. Coordinate interface between testing, modeling and characterization Task 8: Multiscale Modeling i. Initiate research on degradation at the YSZ|GDC|LSCF-SDC interface Any proposed future work is subject to change based on funding levels H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 73
Summary H2NEW HTE • H2NEW HTE is an ambitious program focused on overcoming barriers to cell and stack durability that are impediments to economic competitiveness and industrial implementation • Materials and component degradation mechanisms are the result of multiple, coupled phenomena derived from operating conditions – a comprehensive and accurate understanding of the interplay of these phenomena does not currently exist – therefore rationalizing, predicting and controlling degradation currently beyond our grasp • The H2NEW HTE hypothesis is that a systematic, coordinated research program targeting the coupled degradation phenomena will yield refinements to composition, fabrication and operation that will enable HTE technology to overcome current durability barriers • Harnessing capability at consortium labs is well underway, initial operational experiments initiated H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water 74
Technical Backup and Additional Information Slides
Advantages of SOEC Thermal-Electric process Either O= or H+ conduction possible Pure O2 co-product possible CO2 electrolysis/ co-electrolysis possible 70.0 70.0 Minimum energy for water splitting 39.7 kWh/kg-H2 (Higher Heating Value) Proven Alkaline 60.0 Energy produced by hydrogen combustion (AE 20 bar) 60.0 33.3 kWh/kg-H2 (Lower Heating Value) Proven Proton Exchange Membrane 50.0 50.0 Total Energy (kWh/kg-H2) H2 Compression (PEM, 20 bar) Total Energy (kWh/kg-H2) Power (20 bar) Goal Proven Goal Thermal 40.0 40.0 Thermal Proven Goal Steam generation and superheating 30.0 30.0 Direct heat Proven Input to cell Goal Electricity Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cell 20.0 20.0 Electricity (SOEC, 20 bar) Proven Goal 10.0 10.0 0.0 0.0 0.90 1.00 1.10 1.20 1.30 1.40 1.50 1.60 1.70 1.80 1.90 2.00 H2NEW: Hydrogen from Next-generation Electrolyzers of Water Operating Voltage 76
You can also read