FORTUM - For a cleaner world - Equity story of Investor / Analyst material August 2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Disclaimer This presentation does not constitute an invitation to underwrite, subscribe for, or otherwise acquire or dispose of any Fortum shares. Past performance is no guide to future performance, and persons needing advice should consult an independent financial adviser. Any references to the future represent the management’s current best understanding. However the final outcome may differ from them. 2
Content Fortum in brief 4 – 12 Fortum’s strategy 13 – 21 Energy market transition 22 – 26 Half-year Financial Report 2021 27 – 45 Appendices 46 European and Nordic power markets 47 – 56 Fortum’s Nordic power generation in detail 57 Fortum’s evolution and strategic route 58 Historical achieved prices 59 Dividend 60 IR contact 61 3
Fortum in brief Fortum in brief Power generation assets Key figures 20201 Sales EUR 49.0 bn Comparable EBITDA EUR 2.4 bn Total assets EUR 57.8 bn Personnel 19,933 Main businesses1 Sales (€) Volume2 Capacity India Power 20.8 bn 142 TWh 50.3 GW Gas 22.4 bn ~370 TWh 7.6 bcm3 Heat 0.8 bn 30 TWh 19.5 GW 1) Until 31 of March 2020 Uniper's contribution to the income statement was recognised in the Share of profit/loss of associates and joint ventures. 2) For Power - Power generation, for Gas - Long-term gas supply contracts and for Heat – Heat production 3) Gas storage capacity, billion cubic meters 4
Fortum in brief Strong position to drive the energy transition in Europe 3rd largest 3rd largest 3rd largest 4th largest power generator CO2-free power generator nuclear generator gas storage operator in Europe and Russia in Europe in Europe in Europe 5
6 100 200 0 300 500 600 400 TWh EDF Rosenergoatom EPH incl. LEAG Europe RusHydro NNEGC Energoatom Vattenfall Fortum+Uniper En+ Enel ENGIE Iberdrola Statkraft RWE Source: Company information, Fortum analyses, 2019 figures pro forma. CEZ EnBW Verbund E.ON Axpo EDP Slovenské elektrárne Hafslund E-CO Hidroelectrica Ørsted Gazprom Acciona SSE Naturgy Centrica EPS Alpiq Norsk Hydro Agder Energi Ukrhydroenergo Hydro Nuclear BKK Lyse Energi Other, incl. bio DEI Wind, solar, geoth. EPH PGE Power generation by type DTEK Inter RAO UES Consolidated Fortum is the third largest CO2-free power generator in T Plus Fortum in brief Sibgenco
Fortum in brief Renewables and CO2-free power generation capacity of Fortum 14.1 GW Hydro Wind & Solar Nuclear 8.4 GW 1.2 GW 4.5 GW 7
Fortum in brief Fortum is well positioned for the energy transition Third largest CO2-free power generator in Europe with growing portfolio of wind and solar Significant provider of flexible hydro and gas-fired power generation Major provider and trader of gas for Europe’s energy and industrial customers Versatile portfolio of decarbonisation and environmental solutions Phase out or exit announced of ~8 GW coal-fired generation by 2030 8
Fortum in brief Fortum’s CO2-free power generation increases by ~60% as Uniper is consolidated as a subsidiary Fortum's power generation, TWh 150 Fortum*: Other Coal • CO2-free generation 120 Gas 45% CO2-free • Gas-fired power 90 generation 45% 60 • Share of coal-fired generation 9% 30 • Share of coal of sales revenue ~1% * based on 2020 reported figures 0 Note: Fortum actuals 1990-2020. Uniper consolidated from Q2/2020 onwards, Q1/2020 generation of Uniper excluded. 9
Fortum in brief Fortum is a forerunner in sustainability Fortum is listed in several sustainability indices and ratings: Our purpose is to drive the change for a cleaner world. We are securing a fast and reliable transition to a carbon-neutral economy by providing customers and societies with clean energy and sustainable solutions. This way we deliver excellent shareholder value. 3rd largest CO2-free generator in Europe CO2-free power generation, including renewable and nuclear power, was 64 TWh in 2020. 73% of power generation in Europe, and 45% of total power generation was CO2-free. Specific CO2 emissions Fortum’s specific CO2 emissions from total energy production in Europe were 188 gCO2/kWh in 2020, and 287 gCO2/kWh globally. Growing in solar and wind Targeting a multi-gigawatt wind and solar portfolio, which is subject to the capital recycling business model. Targeting an indicative growth capex for EUR 3 billion for 2021-2025, of which 50-55% to renewables. Signatory of TCFD Fortum an official signatory of TCFD on March 2021 MSCI ESG RATINGS DISCLAIMER STATEMENT: THE USE BY FORTUM CORPORATION OF ANY MSCI ESG RESEARCH LLC OR ITS AFFILIATES (“MSCI”) DATA, AND THE USE OF MSCI LOGOS, TRADEMARKS, SERVICE MARKS OR INDEX NAMES HEREIN, DO NOT CONSTITUTE A SPONSORSHIP, ENDORSEMENT, RECOMMENDATION, OR PROMOTION OF FORTUM CORPORATION BY MSCI. MSCI SERVICES AND DATA ARE THE PROPERTY OF MSCI OR ITS INFORMATION PROVIDERS, AND ARE PROVIDED ‘AS-IS’ AND WITHOUT WARRANTY. MSCI NAMES AND LOGOS ARE TRADEMARKS OR SERVICE MARKS OF MSCI. 10
Fortum in brief Fortum's power generation and heat production by source Fortum’s power generation in 2020 * Fortum's heat production in 2020 * Natural gas 45% Natural gas 56% Total Total Waste1% power generation Others 1% heat production Wind, solar 1% Heat pumps, Bio 1% 142.1 TWh Hydropower 23% electricity 3% 29.6 TWh Bio 5% Coal 9% Waste 9% Nuclear power 20% Coal 26% * Uniper consolidated as of Q2/2020 11
Fortum in brief Fortum key profitability drivers Key market drivers: Fortum profitability drivers: Fortum Group’s indicative EBITDA by business and market exposure Power market European power generation • EU coal/nuclear capacity closures • CO2-free generation: prices and volumes, hedging, PPAs • Growing share of renewables • Gas-fired generation: capturing the • Importance of gas-fired generation merchant upside • Commodity prices • Coal exit path, value from sites • Increasing interconnections between Gas midstream business Nordics, Continental Europe, and the UK • Long-term contracts and sales • Weather conditions • Gas storage, spread, and volatility • Increased demand from decarbonisation • Optimisation business, price volatility and electrification Russia power generation Gas market • Thermal CSAs gradually shifting to CCS • Decreasing gas production in Europe scheme, selective modernisation projects • More volatile gas demand • Renewables capacity with higher CSAs • Gas storage value • Berezovskaya 3 (CSA) • Weather conditions Growth based on strategy Source: Fortum & Uniper financial reporting PPA= Power Purchase Agreement CSA= Capacity Supply Agreements 12 CCS= Competitive Capacity Selection (=KOM)
Fortum’s strategy Our strategy – Driving the clean energy transition and delivering sustainable financial performance For a cleaner world Strengthen and grow in CO2-free Leverage strong position in gas Transform own operations to power generation to enable the energy transition Partner with industrial and carbon neutral infrastructure customers • Supply significant flexible and • Provide security of supply and • Phase out and exit coal reliable CO2-free power generation flexibility in the power system • Provide decarbonisation and • Transform gas-fired generation environmental solutions • Grow sizeable portfolio of • Secure supply of gas for heat, towards clean gas renewables power, and industrial processes • Build on first-mover position in hydrogen Value creation targets Carbon neutral as a Group latest by 2050, Sustainable financial performance through Strong financial position and over time in line with the Paris Agreement, and in our attractive value from investments, portfolio increasing dividend European generation latest by 2035 optimisation, and benchmark operations 13
Fortum’s strategy Measuring success for Fortum Climate and environmental targets: • Group carbon neutral latest by 2050 (scope 1, 2, 3) • European generation carbon neutral latest by 2035 (1, 2) • CO2 emission reduction of at least 50% by 2030 in European generation (1, 2) • Scope 3 target for the indirect emissions from fuel sales business (Cat. 11) to be set during 2021 • Biodiversity target: Number of major voluntary measures enhancing biodiversity ≥12 in 2021 Financial targets: Shareholder value creation: • Financial net debt/comparable EBITDA below 2x • Portfolio optimisation and delivering on investments • Hurdle rates for new investments • Realising financial benefits from the cooperation with Uniper • Rating of at least BBB • Stable, sustainable, and over time increasing dividend Social targets: • Safety target: Total recordable incident frequency (TRIF)
Fortum’s strategy Fortum – A leader in clean power and gas Core Grow Strategic transformation Transform own operations Assets and businesses that have Businesses with potential Businesses and assets outside to carbon neutral a role in energy transition and to grow profitably strategic scope generate good cash-flow in the energy transition Hydro Ambitious Onshore wind Strengthen and grow in coal exit plan CO2-free power generation District heating business Nuclear Solar in the Baltics Leverage strong position in gas to enable Increasingly clean Hydrogen and 50% stake in the energy transition gas-fired generation clean gas Stockholm Exergi Consumer Solutions Provide decarbonisation Industrial and business Gas midstream and environmental solutions infrastructure solutions for industrial and District heating business infrastructure customers in Poland 15
Fortum’s strategy Strategic steps going forward 2014-2020 2021-2022 2023-2025 Major transformation Balance sheet focus Growth in clean power and gas Active portfolio rotation with Step up in Group EBITDA Growth in strategic areas focus on assets essential in the Secure strong balance sheet Sustainable financial performance energy transition and with good with benchmark operations cash flow Rating of at least BBB Details of strategy implementation Cooperation financial benefits Uniper acquisition and first investments Target to increase dividend Focus on aligned strategy Target to increase dividend Flat dividend 16
Fortum’s strategy Indicative capital expenditure for growth investments in 2021-2025 – renewables and clean gas 1 Renewables On-shore wind and solar 2 Hydrogen and clean gas Industrial decarbonisation solutions 3 Environmental and security of supply solutions Waste-to-Energy, recycling, industrial and TSO services 4 Other Venturing, innovation, digitalisation Capital expenditure will depend on market conditions, asset rotation, and balance sheet strength 17
Fortum’s strategy Fortum is growing towards gigawatt scale target in solar and wind power generation Ånstadblåheia 10 MW (Fortum share) PORTFOLIO STATUS CAPACITY, MW FORTUM SHARE, MW SUPPLY STARTS/STARTED Nygårdsfjellet 6 MW (Fortum share) FINLAND 90 18 Sørfjord 20 MW ● Kalax Operational 90 18 Q4 2020 (Fortum share) NORWAY 181 36 ● Nygårdsfjellet Operational 32 6 2006 and 2011 Solberg 15 MW (Fortum share) Ulyanovsk-2 25 MW ● Ånstadblåheia Operational 50 10 2018 Kalax 18 MW (Fortum share) ● Sørfjord Operational 99 20 Q4 2019- Q1 2021 (Fortum share) Ulyanovsk SWEDEN 76 15 35 MW 35 MW solar ● Solberg Operational 76 15 2018 Samara 118 MW power plants RUSSIA 2,009 1,040 (Fortum share) ● Bugulchansk Operational 15 15 2016-2017 Volgograd 52,5 MW ● Pleshanovsk Operational 10 10 2017 (Fortum share) ● Grachevsk Operational 10 10 2017 Rostov 175+25 MW Astrakhan 170 MW ● Kalmykia Under construction 78+38 39+19 Q4 2021- H2 2022 (Fortum share) (Fortum share) ● Ulyanovsk Operational 35 35 2018 Kalmykia 58 MW Bhadla 31 MW (Fortum share) ● Ulyanovsk 2 Operational 50 25 1.1.2019 (Fortum share) Operational/Under Amrit 2 MW (Fortum share) ● Rostov 350+50 175+25 Q1 2020- Q4 2021 construction ● Kalmykia Operational 200 100 1.12.2020 Kapeli 4 MW (Fortum share) ● Astrakhan Under construction 340 170 Q4 2021 ● Volgograd Under construction 88+17 44+9 Q4 2021- Q4 2022 ● Samara Under construction 237 118 Q4 2022 ● Rusnano JV Under development 491 246 2022-2023 INDIA 185 81 First focus markets Pavagada 44 MW ● Amrit Operational 5 2 2012 Wind power plants (Fortum share) ● Kapeli Operational 10 4 2014 ● Bhadla Operational 70 31 2017 Solar power plants ● Pavagada Operational 100 44 2017 TOTAL 2,541 1,190 Under development 491 246 *) NOTE: Table numbers not accounting; tells the size of renewables projects. All not consolidated to Fortum capacities. All Under construction 848 424 figures in MW and rounded to nearest megawatt. Additionally, target to invest 200 – 400 million euros in India solar and Operational 1,202 520 create partnership for operating assets. Under construction includes investment decisions made. 18
Fortum’s strategy Strong commitment to maintain rating of at least BBB Ambition is to preserve financial flexibility and good Long term leverage target: access to capital markets. Financial net debt/comparable EBITDA Fortum will carefully manage its balance sheet going forward focusing on
Fortum’s strategy Return targets for new investments Return targets for new investments: Group 2021 capital expenditure, including maintenance and WACC+ hurdle rate: excluding acquisitions, +100 bps for green investments is estimated to be EUR 1.4 billion +200 bps for other investments • Maintenance of EUR 700 million The requirement might be higher depending on, e.g., business model and technology • Growth of EUR 700 million and will be evaluated case-by-case. ~EUR 3 bn Capital expenditure will depend on market conditions, growth capex asset rotation, and balance sheet strength for 2021-2025 20
Fortum’s strategy Fortum and Uniper cooperation estimated to deliver significant financial benefits Cooperation benefits focus on monetary, safety, and environmental actions • Positive cash impact on a consolidated group basis is estimated to be ~EUR 100 million annually • > EUR 50 million of these annual benefits gradually materialising by the end of 2023 and reaching full annual impact in 2025 • Approx. 450 people have been involved in various work streams 21
Energy market transition Europe committed to be a forerunner in reducing GHG emissions across all sectors • EU is tightening both its 2030 and 2050 emissions targets – Requires emission reductions in all sectors, especially residential & commercial, transport, and industry • Sector coupling – clean electricity and gas enable other sectors to decarbonise – Emissions from some industrial and heavy transport sectors are difficult to abate by electrification • Successful energy transition must balance – Sustainability – Affordability – Security of supply 22
Energy market transition Energy transition will increase demand for electricity and hydrogen Electricity Hydrogen Feedstocks Agriculture Industry Transport Residential and commercial Source: IHS Markit Net Zero Carbon Europe scenario 23
European and Nordic power markets Nordic, Baltic, Continental and UK markets are integrating – Interconnection capacity growing to over 13 GW by end-2023 • Several interconnectors are currently under DK1-DE maximum transmission capacity has been Current Nordic/Baltic 1 upgraded from 1,780 MW to 2,500 MW in July 2020 construction or decided to be built interconnector New 400 MW DK2-DE connection via Kriegers Flak 2 • New interconnections will increase the projects offshore wind area in operation December 2020 Nordic export capacity from the current 3 EU’s Connecting Europe Facility co-financed 3rd EE-LV 9.6 GW to over 13 GW by end of 2023 C transmission line, in operation January 2021 4 NO-DE NordLink is in commercial operation at maximum 1,444 MW from March 2021 + 5200 MW Norway - UK 1,400 MW North Sea Link (NSL) is due 14.1 B 5 to be fully in operation by end-2021 Interconnection capacity (GW) 13.4 13.4 13.4 DK1-DE capacity to grow by further 1,000 MW to 6 3,500 MW with a new 400 kV line by end-2023 11.0 11.0 5 3 1,400 MW Denmark - UK Viking Link is being built 4 A 7 to be ready by end-2023 8.2 7 1 700 MW LT-PL Harmony Link to be built by 2025 as 6.9 9 8 a part of the Baltic synchronisation project 8 6 2 700 MW Hansa PowerBridge DC link between 9 Sweden and Germany by 2026/2027 New interconnectors New Nordic lines A 1,200 MW SE3-SE4 South West Link ready 7/2021 B 800 MW with first measures on SE2-SE3 by 2024 Existing interconnectors C 800 MW 3rd 400 kV line SE1-FI ready in 2025 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Russia Poland Germany 24 Estonia Netherlands Years in the chart above refer to a snapshot of 1st of January each year. Source: Fortum Market Intelligence Lithuania United Kingdom
Energy market transition Volatility and uncertainty in the European power market increases the value of flexible assets Intermittent renewables Nuclear and coal closures Increasing role of gas Volatility and Supply-demand balance uncertainty Increased interconnection between Nordics and Continent Commodity and CO2 prices Weather conditions 25
Energy market transition Own transformation – coal exit to reach carbon neutrality by 2035 in European generation European generation CO2 net emissions: Carbon neutral in our European generation by 2035 at the latest 2019 2030 2035 Transform own 100% -50% Carbon neutral operations to carbon • Current trajectory to reduce CO2 emissions neutral in our European generation by at least 50%*) by 2030 Coal fired capacity in Europe (GW) • Exit ~6 GW of coal capacity by end of 2025 10 Strengthen and grow in CO2-free power • Aim to decarbonise gas-fired power generation 8 generation and transit to clean gas over time 6 Leverage strong 4 position in gas to enable Carbon neutral as a group by 2050 at the the energy transition latest in line with the Paris Agreement 2 **) • Reduction of the Group’s coal-fired 0 generation capacity by >50% to ~5 GW by 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Partner with industrial and infrastructure the end of 2025 customers • Over time transform the Russian business *) Base year 2019 **) Datteln4 decommissioning as defined in the German coal-exit law portfolio by reducing the fossil exposure 26
Half-year Financial Report January-June 2021 Fortum Corporation 17 August 2021
Markus Rauramo President and CEO 28 Fortum Interim Report January-June 2021
Market environment is improving • Macroeconomic outlook is improving, and global growth forecasts have been upgraded lately as vaccination efforts appear to reduce disruptive effects of new Covid-19 waves on economic activity • Strong year-on-year European demand growth reflects recovery from the very low levels impacted by Covid-19 • Energy commodity prices are supported by the ongoing economic recovery • European power markets characterised by very strong performance during Q2 2021 • Normalising power demand led to significant growth in thermal power generation in central Europe • Increasing interconnection capacity and higher price volatility (due to renewables) • “Fit for 55” package was presented by the European Commission in mid-July CO2 • The package puts strong focus on carbon pricing and extends the EU ETS to new sectors • Carbon prices continued to set new records in 2021 29
Determined execution of our strategy • We deliver • We deliver • We deliver on our plans on our strategy on our way to net-zero Use of coal in Fortum's Russia Solid operational performance Divestments concluded segment to cease at the end of across segments of up to EUR 5.2 billion 2022 Financial performance fully Rating outlook improved Accelerated coal phase-out: on track to “stable” early closures in GER and UK 30
Good operational performance across the group despite phasing effects Comp. OP* Comp. EPS** OCF Leverage*** H1 1206 1.09 1002 1120
H1, all segments improved – significant impact from Uniper profits Comparable operating profit (EUR million) 510 -1 1206 Generation higher achieved power price Russia stronger underlying performance offsetting negative FX 39 4 55 2 596 City Solutions higher power and heat sales Consumer Solutions higher margins from value added services Uniper Generation City Consumer fully consolidated from Q2 2020 I-II/2020 Russia Uniper Other I-II/2021 Solutions Solutions 32
Q2 – Significant phasing effects in Uniper segment Comparable operating profit (EUR million) Generation successful physical optimisation partly offset by slightly higher costs 11 0 -201 22 0 203 Russia stronger underlying performance offsetting lower CSAs City Solutions higher power sales Consumer Solutions higher margins from value added services -2 35 Uniper strong result in commodities business in Q2 2020 and negative phasing effect in Q2 2021 II/2020 Generation Russia City Consumer Uniper Other II/2021 Solutions Solutions 33
Determined execution of our transformation strategy continues Strengthening balance sheet Accelerated decarbonisation Balanced growth EUR 5.2 billion of divestments in 1.5 years Fortum Russia division end of coal-fired Leverage target: generation by end of 2022 Financial net debt/ • Stockholm Exergi: Sale of 50% ownership comparable EBITDA • Sale of Argayash coal-fired CHP, Chelyabinsk ratio
Bernhard Günther CFO 35
Key financials MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY LTM 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 H1 strong financial performance Sales 17,128 12,330 38,621 13,687 49,015 73,950 LTM comparable EBITDA at EUR 3.2 Comparable EBITDA 348 512 1,827 1,055 2,434 3,206 billion Comparable operating profit 35 203 1,206 596 1,344 1,954 LTM Comparable EPS at EUR 1.61 Comparable share of profits of 52 23 119 574 656 201 associates and joint ventures Comparable profit before 97 209 1,354 1,110 1,897 2,141 Healthy credit metrics of ‘BBB’ with income taxes improved outlook to “stable” by S&P and Comparable net profit 79 155 915 968 1,483 1,431 Fitch Comparable EPS 0.09 0.17 1.03 1.09 1.67 1.61 Latest announced divestments to bring Net cash from operating Financial net debt / Comp. EBITDA clearly 289 440 1,120 1,002 2,555 2,673 activities below target level of
Generation: Q2 Q2'21 Q2'20 Higher achieved power prices Volumes (TWh) 5,5 5,1 5,4 5,6 0,0 0,1 Q2 2021 vs. Q2 2020 Hydro Nuclear Wind • Comparable operating profit +13% mainly due to higher achieved H1 H1'21 H1'20 Volumes power prices and slightly higher volumes (TWh) 12,2 11,5 11,8 11,9 – Higher achieved power price EUR 38.1, +4.5 per MWh 0,3 0,0 – Very successful physical optimisation and higher spot prices Hydro Nuclear Wind • Partly offset by slightly higher costs MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 LTM Sales 575 450 1,251 1,024 2,006 2,233 Comp. 243 212 558 485 886 959 EBITDA H1 2021 vs. H1 2020 Comp. OP 195 173 464 409 722 778 • Positive contribution from higher achieved prices and slightly higher Comp. net 6,207 5,957 6,234 hydro volumes (+0.7 TWh) while nuclear volumes marginally lower (- assets 0.1 TWh) due to maintenance breaks Comp. 12.2 13.0 RONA % • Tax-exempt capital gain of EUR 50 million in Q1 2021 Gross in- 35 34 62 68 228 222 vestment 37
Nordic hydro reservoirs close to normal levels, strong spot prices influenced by Continental European power prices Reservoir content (TWh) 120 • High hydro power generation and below normal Hydro reservoirs precipitation led to normalisation of reservoirs 100 80 • Nordic reservoirs 3 TWh above long-term average at the 60 end of Q2 2021, 9 TWh below average in early August 40 Norway 20 Sweden 2000 2003 2020 2021 Average Finland 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 EUR/MWh 80 • Nord Pool system spot price continued strong since Q1 2021 Realised system price 70 Futures 12 August 2021 recovery, reaching EUR 41.9 per MWh (5.6) in Q2 2021 Power price 60 Futures 6 May 2021 50 • Nordic spot price is supported by Continental European 40 power prices, which in turn are driven by increased gas and 30 carbon prices 20 10 • Below normal precipitation and wind generation, together 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 with increased export capacity have driven the Nordic power 2019 2020 2021 2022 price Source: Nord Pool, Nasdaq Commodities 38
Higher achieved power prices System spot power price, Nord Pool Achieved power price, Generation segment EUR/MWh Substantially higher spot EUR/MWh 42 37,1 37,2 38,1 48 42,1 41,9 33,6 35,2 40 35 power prices in the Nordics 32 28 24 21 Increased achieved power 13,8 16 5,6 8,9 14 prices 8 7 0 0 Q2/2020 Q3/2020 Q4/2020 Q1/2021 Q2/2021 Q2/2020 Q3/2020 Q4/2020 Q1/2021 Q2/2021 Spot power price, Urals hub Achieved power price, Russia segment* RUB/MW EUR/MW Russian power demand picking 1 200 1 109 1 074 1 158 1 156 24 23,3 23,1 22,5 21,1 22,5 up with increasing electricity 1 021 1 000 20 prices 800 16 Russian achieved price in rubles 600 12 400 8 200 4 increased 0 0 Q2/2020 Q3/2020 Q4/2020 Q1/2021 Q2/2021 Q2/2020 Q3/2020 Q4/2020 Q1/2021 Q2/2021 NOTE: Achieved power price (includes capacity payments) in RUB increased by 7% 39 * Does not include Uniper’s subsidiary Unipro
Russia: Q2 Q2'21 Q2'20 Solid underlying performance Volumes (TWh) 6,1 5,4 2,4 2,5 Q2 2021 vs. Q2 2020 Power Heat • Comparable operating profit flat at EUR 37 million H1 H1'21 H1'20 Volumes – Changes in CSA* payments, lower bond yield, and higher power prices (TWh) 14,6 13,8 9,9 8,7 – Impact of the Russian ruble exchange rate was EUR -2 million Power Heat • Strategy execution: MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY – Divestment of Argayash CHP and decision to cease coal use by the end of 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 LTM 2022 – Annual CO2 emissions to be reduced by ~2 million tonnes Sales 182 202 446 519 929 856 H1 2021 vs. H1 2020 Comp. 70 74 205 213 394 386 EBITDA • Comparable operating profit increased by 1% Comp. OP 37 37 137 135 251 252 – EUR 17 million positive effect of the sale of the 116-MW solar project Comp. net 2,572 2,813 2,431 assets – Changes in CSA* payments, lower bond yield, and higher power prices Comp. 11.1 12.7 RONA % – Change in the Russian ruble exchange rate was EUR -23 million Gross in- 30 47 37 51 91 76 vestment * CSA = Capacity Supply Agreement 40
City Solutions: Q2 Q2'21 Q2'20 Performance improved Volumes (TWh) 1,8 2,0 0,8 0,6 Q2 2021 vs. Q2 2020 Power Heat • District heating with higher power prices and higher power sales H1 H1'21 H1'20 Volumes (TWh) 6,2 5,6 2,1 1,5 Power Heat H1 2021 vs. H1 2020 MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY • Higher heat sales volumes, higher power prices, and higher 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 LTM Norwegian heat prices Sales 256 212 674 554 1,075 1,196 Comp. 43 32 175 138 239 276 • Strategy execution: EBITDA Comp. OP -4 -15 82 43 47 87 – Announced divestment of 50% ownership in Stockholm Exergi Comp. net 2,572 3,628 3,679 – Announced divestment of 500 MW of solar power plants in India assets Comp. – Closing of the sale of the Baltic district heating business in July RONA % 2.8 4.4 Gross in- 39 30 86 69 333 350 vestment 41
Consumer Solutions: Number of Continued profitability improvement customers Q2 2021 2 320 Q4 2020 2 390 Q2 2021 vs. Q2 2020 • Comparable operating profit flat MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 LTM • 15th consecutive quarter of comparable EBITDA improvement Sales 424 237 1,085 661 1,267 1,691 • The gas volume increased mainly due to an increase of enterprise customers in Poland Comp. 36 35 89 82 153 161 EBITDA Comp. OP 19 19 55 51 90 94 Comp. net 618 543 565 H1 2021 vs. H1 2020 assets Gross in- 25 13 36 28 57 65 • Consumer Solutions’ competitiveness continued to strengthen vestment • Several new digital services were launched during the first half of 2021 • Higher margins from value-added services • Strategy execution: – Strategic review ongoing 42
Uniper: Q2 Q2'21 Q2'20 9,5 9,4 Solid underlying performance Volumes (TWh) 3,2 3,5 2,9 2,8 8,4 5,3 Q2 2021 vs. Q2 2020 Hydro Nuclear Thermal CE Thermal RUS • European Generation business benefitted from Irsching 4 & 5 H1 H1'21 H1'20 21,9 Volumes* and Datteln 4 contribution (TWh) 19,1 9,4* 6,6 6,5 5,3* • Global Commodities business was significantly below previous year 3,5* 2,8* due to a positive effect of the realisation of hedges in the coal, freight, Hydro Nuclear Thermal CE Thermal RUS and oil business in Q2 2020 MEUR II/ II/ I-II/ I-II/ FY • Russian Power Generation’s Berezovskaya 3 back online in Q2 2021 2021 2020 2021 2020 2020 LTM • Changes in fair value of derivatives of EUR -910 (160) million Sales 15,893 11,365 35,663 11,365 44,514 68,812 • Strategy execution: Comp. -17 184 851 184 856 1,523 EBITDA – Accelerated closure of more than 2 GW’s of coal: Heyden Comp. OP -177 24 534 24 363 873 4, Wilhelmshaven, Scholven C, and Ratcliffe Comp. net 8,233 7,768 7,432 assets H1 2021 vs. H1 2020 Comp. 12.1 RONA % • Uniper as a subsidiary from Q2 2020 Gross in- 184 145 320 145 639 813 vestment • Strong Q1 2021 contribution (optimisation gains) * Uniper consolidated from Q2 2020 43
Credit outlook improved Solid credit metrics debt 'BBB' long-term issuer credit rating, debt stable outlook netnet 'BBB' long-term issuer credit rating, stable outlook Financial Target ratio: Financial < 2x Financial net debt / Comp. EBITDA Fortum’s objective: Maintain solid investment grade rating of at least BBB to maintain financial strength, preserve financial flexibility, and good access to capital. 3 500 per 30 June 2021 Total loans EUR 9,790 million (excl. lease) 3 000 Bonds • Average interest of 1.5% (2020: 1.5%) for Group loan Maturity profile portfolio incl. derivatives hedging financial net 2 500 Financial institutions • EUR 685 million (2020: 634) swapped to RUB with 2 000 Other long-term loans average interest 6.4% (2020: 6.2%) incl. hedging cost Short-term loans • Average interest of 0.7% (2020: 0.9%) for EUR loans 1 500 Liquid funds of EUR 1,703 million 1 000 Undrawn credit facilities of EUR 5,100 million 500 0 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030+ 44
Outlook Hedging 2021 Estimated annual capital Russia Generation Nordic hedges: expenditure, including maintenance CSA changes: For the rest of 2021: 75% hedged at EUR 33 and excluding acquisitions, of Lower bond yield, bond yield 6.3% (7.6%) per MWh For 2022: 60% hedged at EUR 31 per MWh EUR 1,400 million Changes in CSA and CCS capacities: (Q1: 55% at EUR 31) see interim report p. 22-23, 25 of which maintenance capital expenditure Uniper Nordic hedges: is EUR 700 million In 2021, in the Russia segment, the negative financial effect related to the For the rest of 2021: 90% hedged at EUR 26 Tax guidance for 2021: ending of the CSA period of two production per MWh The comparable effective income tax rate units is expected to exceed the positive For 2022: 85% hedged at EUR 24 per MWh for Fortum is estimated to be in the range effect of three units entering the four-year (Q1: 80% at EUR 24) of 20-25% period of higher CSA payments For 2023: 45% hedged at EUR 22 per MWh (Q1: 35% at EUR 21) 45
Appendices
European and Nordic power markets Western European countries exiting coal during this decade • Sweden and Austria closed their last coal plants during 2020 FI: Phase-out by mid-2029 • France is committed to phase out coal by 2022 DE: Phase-out SE: Last by 2038 plant closed • Portugal has 2023 as national exit goal, but operators aim for full closure 2020 already in 2021 UK: Phase-out by DK: Phase-out • UK full exit by the end of 2024 by restricting coal plants’ access to market 2024 by 2030 • Italy and Ireland have both announced phase-out by 2025, also Hungary to close its last coal plant by then NL: Phase-out by • Greece has stated 2028 as year for full phase-out end-2029 • Netherlands and Finland have 2029 as regulated phase-out year, Denmark is committed to 2030 as is Slovakia FR: Phase-out by 2022 • Germany to phase out coal by end-2038 latest, possibly already 2035 AT: Last plant • Significant coal countries without explicit exit date include e.g. Spain, closed 2020 Czechia and Poland SK: Phase-out by 2030 – In Spain, significant number of coal plants have recently already closed, and PT: Phase-out by operators are underway to close down even the rest by mid-2020s 2023 HU: Last plant to close 2025 – In Czechia, a multi-stakeholder commission has proposed a coal phase-out by 2038, but no political decision available as of yet IT: Phase-out by 2025 GR: Phase-out by – Poland expects share of coal in the power mix to decline and targets lower- 2028 carbon generation in newbuilds, but no timeline for phase-out of coal exists Phase-out from Phase-out from Phase-out from power sector power sector power sector latest by 2025 latest by 2030 latest by 2040 47
European and Nordic power markets Decarbonisation requires other sectors to join • The EU has agreed to increase the 2030 total emissions reduction target to 55% vs 1990. • In July 2021, EU Commission put forward a “Fit for 55” package, laying out the roadmap for achieving the new ambitious climate target • Proposed EU ETS revisions widen its scope, tighten supply and push for faster decarbonisation: − Emissions reduction target increased from 43% to 61% from 2005 level − EU ETS scope to expand and include maritime sector − Higher LRF (4.2% instead of 2.2%) combined with cap rebasing − Free allocation to be gradually phased out − Higher MSR intake rate (24%) and thresholds (400-833) maintained − Cross Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) proposed • Proposed revisions will have to go through the EU legislative process and are expected to take effect not earlier than late 2022 or 2023 Abatement cost ranges formed of typical values found in industry analyses. Sources: ICIS, Refinitiv, EU Commission. 48
European and Nordic power markets Fortum major player in power, gas and heat Power generation Gas Heat production Largest generators in Europe and Russia, 2019 Largest European gas storage operators, 2018 Largest global producers, 2019 TWh TWh TWh EDF STOGIT Gazprom Rosenergoatom T Plus Fortum+Uniper Storengy Sibgenco RWE Hungarian Gas Storage Gazprom Inter RAO UES Enel Uniper Energy Storage Veolia RusHydro NAM RusHydro Inter RAO UES En+ Vattenfall Astora EDF ENGIE Enagas Fortum+Uniper EPH Quadra NNEGC Energoat. Gas Storage Poland KDHC En+ OMV Gas Storage TGC-2 Iberdrola TAQA Gas Storage Vattenfall CEZ PGE RAG.Energy.Storage Minskenergo Statkraft PGE TERÉGA T Plus Lukoil EnBW Depogaz Ploiești Tatenergo Sibgengo innogy Gas Storage PGNiG EDP E.ON EPS Nafta Kyivteploenergo Verbund VNG Gasspeicher Ørsted Axpo Conexus Baltic Grid Stockholm Exergi DTEK SSE EWE Gasspeicher EPH E.ON TGC-14 MMBF Naturgy Helen DEI GSA CEZ 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 0 40 80 120 160 200 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 Source: Company information, Fortum analyses, 2019 figures pro forma. GIE Storage Database. 49 EPH incl. LEAG. No data from China.
European and Nordic power markets Commodity prices USD / t Coal price (ICE API2 2022) EUR / tCO2 CO2 price (EUA DEC 2021) 125 60 100 48 75 36 50 24 25 12 0 0 Q1/19 Q2/19 Q3/19 Q4/19 Q1/20 Q2/20 Q3/20 Q4/20 Q1/21 Q2/21 Q3/21 Q1/19 Q2/19 Q3/19 Q4/19 Q1/20 Q2/20 Q3/20 Q4/20 Q1/21 Q2/21 Q3/21 EUR / MWh Gas price (TTF 2022) USD / bbl Crude oil price (ICE Brent) 35 100 28 80 21 60 14 40 7 20 0 0 Q1/19 Q2/19 Q3/19 Q4/19 Q1/20 Q2/20 Q3/20 Q4/20 Q1/21 Q2/21 Q3/21 Q1/19 Q2/19 Q3/19 Q4/19 Q1/20 Q2/20 Q3/20 Q4/20 Q1/21 Q2/21 Q3/21 Source: Bloomberg 50 12 August 2021
European and Nordic power markets Wholesale power prices EUR/MWh Spot prices Forward prices 110 100 90 80 70 German 60 Nordic 50 40 Russian* 30 20 10 0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Forwards 12 August 2021 Rolling 7-day average spot price * Including weighted average capacity price 51 Source: Nord Pool, Bloomberg Finance LP, ATS, NP “Market Council”, Fortum
European and Nordic power markets Nordic year forwards Year10 Year11 Year12 Year13 Year14 Year15 Year16 Year17 Year18 Year19 Year20 Year21 Year22 Year23 €/MWh 12 August 2021 Year23 70 Year22 60 50 Apr May Jun Jul 2021 2021 2021 2021 40 30 20 10 0 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 52 Source: Nasdaq Commodities, Bloomberg
European and Nordic power markets German and Nordic forward spread Spot price EUR/MWh Nordic and German daily spot prices in 2019 – 2021 May June July • After the price recovery seen in Q1 2021, Nordic system price has 120 2021 2021 2021 remained on average close to 40 €/MWh during Q2 2021. 100 • Continental European power prices have been driven higher by 80 increasing gas and carbon prices. 60 • German-Nordic spread for Q2 2021 realised at 18 €/MWh. 40 20 0 -20 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2019 2020 2021 Forward price 13 August 2021 Nordic Germany • The German contract for 2022 delivery is trading around 80 €/MWh, while corresponding Nordic SYS contract is close to 40 €/MWh. EUR/MWh Nordic and German year 2022 forwards in 2019 – 2021 • The German-Nordic spread for 2022 delivery has increased from 25 90 EUR/MWh during the start of 2021 to a level of 40 EUR/MWh recently. 80 70 • German contract is tracking the changes in short-run marginal costs for 60 gas and coal fired condensing units, reflecting the stronger exposure to 50 40 fossil fuel and CO2 prices. 30 • The Nordic contract is influenced by growing Nordic renewable supply 20 and limited interconnector capacity towards the Continental Europe. 10 0 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 2019 2020 2021 12 August 2021 Nordic Germany 53 Source: Nord Pool, Bloomberg
European and Nordic power markets CO2 price and Nordic spot power price EUR / tCO2 CO2 price (EUA DEC 2021) & Nordic sys spot price 80 CO2 price (EUA DEC 2021) 70 Nordic system spot price 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July August 2020 2021 Until 13 August 2021 54 Source: Bloomberg
European and Nordic power markets CO2 price and Nordic forward price EUR / tCO2 CO2 price (EUA DEC 2021) & Year 22 forward price 60 CO2 price (EUA DEC 2021) Nordic year 2022 forward 50 40 30 20 10 0 Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb March April May June July August 2020 2021 Until 12 August 2021 55 Source: Bloomberg
European and Nordic power markets Nordic forward prices and Nordic sys spot averages EUR/MWh 50 Year 2018 forward System spot 2018 average Year 2019 forward System spot 2019 average Year 2020 forward System spot 2020 average 40 30 20 10 0 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 56 Source: Bloomberg
Fortum’s Nordic power generation in detail Fortum’s Nordic, Baltic and Polish generation capacity Of which GENERATION CAPACITY Fortum Uniper NORWAY MW FINLAND MW Hydro 6,448 1,771 Price areas Hydro 1,553 Nuclear 4,8181 1,9961 NO4, Wind 993 Nuclear 1,487 NO4 SE1 CHP 1,185 2,4 4492 NO1, CHP 24 CHP 375 Other thermal 1,727 1,162 Generation capacity 123 Other thermal 565 Wind 1013,4 - Generation capacity 3,980 FI SE2 NO3 Generation capacity, MW 14,279 5,378 Of which SWEDEN Fortum Uniper BALTICS AND NO5 Figures 31 December 2020 NO1 POLAND MW Price areas SE2, Hydro 3,185 1,635 Generation capacity, CHP NO2 SE3 EE SE3, Hydro 1,587 13 in Estonia 434 SE4, Hydro 123 123 in Latvia 284 SE3, Nuclear 3,3311 1,9961 in Lithuania 184 1) Ringhals 1 (of which Uniper’s share 269 MW) closed at the end of 2020 LV 2) Öresundsverket 449 MW facility mothballed in 2018 DK1 SE4 SE3, CHP 6 - in Poland 233 3) The capacity includes the Sørfjord 99 MW wind portfolio in Norway, of which a majority 80% ownership has been sold in January 2021. 1) 2) LT SE4, CHP 4492 4492 4) The capacity includes the 89 MW CHP assets in the Baltics and DK2 SE4, Other th. 1,162 1,162 in Latvia, Wind 24 the 2 MW wind power plant in Latvia, which have been divested in July 2021. Gen. capacity 9,843 5,378 PL Associated companies’ plants (not included in the MWs): Stockholm Exergi (Former Fortum Värme) in Stockholm; TSE in Naantali DENMARK, DK1 MW Generation capacity, CHP 9 57
Fortum’s evolution and strategic route Fortum’s evolution and historical strategic route Skandinaviska Birka Energi Länsivoima Elnova Østfold Elverk 50% Fortum →100% 50% → 100% 50% Stockholm Gullspång merged Shares in Divestment of Divestment of with Hafslund Fingrid shares small scale hydro Gullspång Stora Kraft Birka Energi TGC-1 E.ON Divestment Stockholm Energi 50% → 100% established Finland of Lenenergo shares Shares in Divestment of Divestment of Länsivoima Lenenergo Lenenergo Oil business heat operations non-strategic 45% → shares → District heating spin-off TGC-10 outside of heat business 65% in Poland → Stockholm IVO FORTUM NESTE 1996 1997 1998 2000 2002 2003 2005 2006 2007 2008 2011 2012 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2020 2021 Divestments of EUR ~5.2 bn Divestment of electricity Divestment of DUON Nordkraft wind power Investment in Uniper Divestment of district heating businesses 0.5 GW solar divestment in India distribution business electricity in Joensuu and Järvenpää distribution Divestment of recharge infrastructure Ekokem Restructuring of Divestment of Divestment of district heating business Divestment of electricity ownership in Hafslund ownership in business in the Baltics distribution and heat businesses Hafslund Produksjon Majority owner in Uniper Turebergs Russian wind power JV Divestment of Stockholm Exergi Recycling Nordic wind capital recycling (80%) Divestment of Grangemouth power plant Divestment of small hydro Divestment of Gasum shares 58
Historical achieved prices Hedging improves stability and predictability – principles based on risk mitigation, (Generation segment) EUR/MWh Realised prices quarterly since 2000 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Achieved power price Spot price Fin,Sto,Sun avg (40/40/20) 59 2009 onwards thermal and import from Russia excluded
Dividend Fortum’s dividend policy aiming at increasing dividend Fortum dividends EUR/share 1,20 1.12 1.10 1.10 1.10 1.10 1,00 Dividend policy: 0,80 “Fortum’s dividend policy is to pay a stable, 0,60 sustainable, and over time increasing dividend.” 0,40 0,20 0,00 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 60
Next events: January-September Interim Report on 12 November 2021 For more information, please visit www.fortum.com/investors To subscribe Fortum's releases, please fill out the subscription form on our website Fortum Investor Relations and https://www.fortum.com/about-us/media/media-room/subscribe-press-releases Financial Communications Ingela Ulfves Rauno Tiihonen Måns Holmberg Carlo Beck Pirjo Lifländer Camilla Nikk Vice President, Manager Manager Manager IR Specialist Coordinator Investor Relations and Financial Communication +358 (0)40 515 1531 +358 (0)10 453 6150 +358 (0)44 518 1518 +49 172 751 2480 +358 (0)40 643 3317 +358 (0)50 516 9484 ingela.ulfves@fortum.com rauno.tiihonen@fortum.com mans.holmberg@fortum.com carlo.beck@fortum.com pirjo.liflander@fortum.com camilla.nikk@fortum.com Follow us on: Fortum ForEnergy blog at www.twitter.com/Fortum www.linkedin.com/company/fortum www.youtube.com/user/fortum fortumforenergyblog.wordpress.com
You can also read