"ENGAGED, PROFESSIONAL - AND FEMALE?" A GENDER PERSPECTIVE ON MUSEUM EDUCATION IN GERMANY
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 METHODICAL AND INFORMATIVE TEXTS/METODICKÉ A INFORMAČNÍ TEXTY “ENGAGED, PROFESSIONAL – AND FEMALE?” A GENDER PERSPECTIVE ON MUSEUM EDUCATION IN GERMANY MARKUS WALZ https://doi.org/10.5817/MuB2021-2-6 ABSTRACT/ABSTRAKT: job of museum education in the a jiné výchovně vzdělávací 1960s (West and East Germany). činnosti v muzeích byly i během The employees in German The search for honorary staff první poloviny 20. století nadále museum education are currently to carry out museum pedagogy úzce spojeny s funkcí kurátora predominantly women. Since steered women into this field of sbírek či vědeckého ředitele almost all professions in Central activity. This article concludes muzea. Obě tyto pracovní pozice Europe were reserved for men in with the thesis that the rise of byly převážně obsazovány muži. the past, what is interesting about individual women from precarious První organizátorkou muzejního museum education is when women employment to permanent positions vzdělávání na plný úvazek se took up this profession and how in museum education led to the stala až v letech 1925–1934 Fride this gender imbalance was able current dominance of women in Schottmüller, která zůstala to take shape. Two hypotheses this field of activity. nadlouho ojedinělým příkladem suggest themselves: the argument působení ženy v této nově vznikající of maternity gave rise to several „Angažovaná, profesionální – profesi. Samostatná pracovní educational job profiles for women, a žena?“ Muzejní edukace pozice muzejního edukátora byla especially that of kindergarten v Německu z pohledu gender vytvořena muži v šedesátých teacher, but also that of elementary letech 20. století (v Západním school teacher. The emancipation Muzejní edukace v Německu a Východním Německu). movement around 1900 fought for je v současnosti doménou žen. Následná potřeba zapojení special women’s academies and Vzhledem k tomu, že ve střední dalšího neplaceného personálu do for the reservation of individual Evropě byla téměř všechna povolání vykonávání výchovně vzdělávacích professions, supposedly particularly v minulosti vyhrazena mužům, prací v muzeu přivedla pak k této suitable for women, for women zajímá nás, kdy se ženy v oblasti oblasti činnosti také ženy. Článek interested in them. The search for muzejní edukace prosadily a jak končí konstatováním, že současná reflections in the history of the k této genderové nevyváženosti převaha žen v oblasti muzejní development of German museum mohlo dojít. Nabízejí se hned dvě edukace je vyústěním vývoje jejich education shows that neither of hypotézy. Jednou z nich je, že působení v tomto oboru činnosti, these phenomena explains the předpokladem vzniku některých který směřoval od příležitostné professional activities of women ženských výchovně vzdělávacích práce až k stálému zaměstnání. in museum education: guiding the profesí, zejména učitelky visitors and other educational work v mateřské či základní škole, bylo KEYWORDS/KLÍČOVÁ SLOVA: in museums remained, even in mateřství. Druhá hypotéza tvrdí, the first half of the 20th century, že o vznik speciálních vzdělávacích museum education – museum firmly linked to the position of the ústavů pro ženy a etablování pedagogics – feminisation – museum collector or the scientific director jednotlivých typicky ženských history – Germany of the museum. Men dominated profesí se zasloužilo emancipační muzejní edukace – muzejní both positions. The first full-time hnutí na přelomu 19. a 20. století. pedagogika – feminizace – dějiny organiser of museum education, Při pohledu do historie muzejnictví – Německo Frida Schottmüller, appeared muzejní edukace v Německu late (1925–1934). As a woman, však zjišťujeme, že ani jeden she remained an isolated case z uvedených fenoménů nevysvětluje The headline of this article within this emerging profession. odborné působení žen v této paraphrases the title of a handbook Men developed the separate oblasti: provázení návštěvníků article on museum education in 77
MUSEOLOGIC A BRUNENSIA Austria today. Its author stated: characterised by a high proportion was on the “technical assistant” “The professional field is clearly of women. in collection management female”; as evidence she cited that (cataloguing, photographing, among the 34 museum educators An additional explanatory model drawing).5 The libraries took certified in Austria, 32 are may be constructed by reflecting a faster development: Since 1907, women.1 Information concerning the history of schooling. Some an association of female library the (uncertified) majority of German countries already knew assistants existed in Germany Austrian museum educators does female teachers in the 18th century (“Vereinigung bibliothekarisch not exist. Although Germany (independent of nuns at convent arbeitender Frauen”).6 Educational annually presents its museum schools). In all Western societies, tasks were not an issue in either statistics, gender-related data is since the 19th century, there has context. also lacking there: since 1981, been a persistent increase in the a single questionary asked for the proportion of women teachers in Since there is little data on this gender of museum directors but general, especially in elementary aspect of museum history, this only of directors. A clue is provided schools.4 The women’s school article collects circumstantial by the 64 board seats that exist in (“Frauenschule”), newly created evidence of women’s museum total in the German professional in Germany in 1908, specifically pedagogical work in Germany in association “Bundesverband qualified female teachers in chronological order to discover Museumspädagogik” and its six home economics, needwork or this kind of women’s activity in regional associations; eleven of gymnastics, as well as kindergarten history and conceivable reasons them are occupied by men. The teachers. As soon as school children for that. Because the historical proportion of men on the individual were seen as a target group for outlines of museum education boards varies from 50 per cent on museums, the participation of are unclear, all museum work in the national board (2 out of 4) to women in educational work would personal contact to visitors is taken zero on the regional association in be conceivable. into consideration. The search Baden-Württemberg (0 out of 10).2 begins with any kind of imparting Pointing in the same direction, Two other historical phenomena in a collection even as an unpaid less than five per cent of the are not currently suitable for activity. applications for art education at the constructing further explanatory temporary exhibition “documenta models. Firstly, the supervision Pre-modernity: museum 12”, 2007 in Kassel, were submitted of young children was already education hidden in personal by men.3 a matter for women in its unions beginnings around 1770 (Marie- As a reason, one can reflect from Salomé Oberlin, Ban de la Roche/ Even if the clear break in museum the European modern history that Alsace). Qualification programmes history with the French Revolution almost all professional activities for early childhood education in is now disputed, reflections on the were initially reserved for men Germany were initially aimed history of museum education have and that women had to fight for exclusively at women (first in the so far followed this dichotomy equal rights. Consequently, there Kaiserswerth Deaconess House, of pre-modernity and modernity. should be a transition from a male- founded in 1836). However, there Eva Sturm, for example, claimed dominated to a museum education are no indications that young that the beginnings of museum children were considered a target education were genuinely 1 STÖGER, Gabriele. Engagiert, professionell, serviceorientiert – weiblich: Kunst- und group for museum work in earlier interwoven with the beginnings Kulturvermittlung in österreichischen Museen. years. Secondly, one strand of art museums (which she dated In COMMANDEUR, Beatrix, Hannelore KUNZ- of the women’s emancipation around 1800).7 Accordingly, it OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). Handbuch Museumspädagogik. Kulturelle Bildung in Museen. movement established separate München: Kopaed, 2016, pp. 383–390; here women’s academies around 5 GRÜTTEL, Else. Weibliche Museumsangestellte. p. 383. Museumskunde. Zeitschrift für Verwaltung und 1900. At the same time, museum Technik öffentlicher und privater Sammlungen, 2 Bundesverband Museumspädagogik e.V. Karlsruhe [online]. [accessed 2021-08-20]. Available from professionals were discussing 1913, vol. 9, pp. 219–224. www: . whether women were suitable 6 LÜDTKE, Helga. Anspruchsvolle Arbeit 3 MÖRSCH, Carmen. Am Kreuzungspunkt von for museum work. The focus für „bedürfnislose“ Frauen. Die ersten Bibliothekarinnen in Deutschland. In LÜDTKE, vier Diskursen: Die documenta 12 Vermittlung Helga (ed.). Leidenschaft und Bildung. Zur zwischen Affirmation, Reproduktion, Geschichte der Frauenarbeit in Bibliotheken. Berlin: Dekonstruktion und Transformation. In MÖRSCH, 4 ESSEN, Mineke van and Rebecca ROGERS. Zur Orlanda, 1992, pp. 25–52; here pp. 37, 43. Carmen (ed.). Kunstvermittlung II. Zwischen Geschichte der Lehrerinnen. Historiographische kritischer Praxis und Dienstleistung auf der Herausforderungen und internationale 7 STURM, Eva. Woher kommen die documenta 12. Zürich; Berlin: Diaphanes, 2009, Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 2006, Kunst-Vermittlerinnen? Versuch einer pp. 9–33; here p. 14. vol. 52, pp. 319–337. Positionsbestimmung. In Dürfen die das? Kunst 78
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 is necessary to examine what Academic Museum at Göttingen in learning, but also travelling happened to concepts prevalent in University (1773). Even in the merchants and their relatives, if the Ancien Régime after the turn of realia collections of higher schools, any, who were travelling with the century around 1800. for example from 1698 at the them. Because of the limited Paedagogium in Halle (Saale), no demand, these tours were Firstly, smaller presentations museum pedagogy was detachable, secondary tasks of castellans and of collections were handled by because the person responsible for other servants. In princely painting the owner himself, who showed the didactics gathered, arranged galleries, the court painter was them to visitors and engaged and used the collections for the usually commissioned as gallery in conversation with them. teaching purpose in question. director, who could possibly Consequently, there was no This direct didactic connection delegate to a gallery inspector; museum education that could be of the teaching collections proves the situation was similar with detached from the owner. In the continuity up to the present in librarians. Professors delegated bourgeois milieu, there were more the university collections and tours of university collections natural history cabinets than art museums. to students; they called the collections. This also applies to professor in if a visitor asked very religious orders; unfortunately, Thirdly, the collections of fine art knowledgeable questions. there are no publications on took a different development in conceivable collections in that princely art collections in the The gender relations in these four women’s monasteries. The 18th century were made practically pre-modern schemes depend on secularisation of the monasteries usable for the founding of drawing external factors. The personal dispersed most of these collections; schools (sculpture collection) union of owner and mediator the princely collections changed and art academies (painting could only be female-determined smoothly with the increasing gallery), and in most cases the to the extent that there were understanding of the collections gallery director also headed the female collectors; in the case of the as state instruments that were no art academy. The period around princesses, it must be remembered longer part of the monarch’s way 1800 marked an apparent caesura: that in most German countries of life and therefore did not require the paths of the art museum and women are only conceivable any personal commitment on the the art academy diverged, and the as wives of the monarch or as part of the prince. Only private art academies established separate guardians of the future monarch. collections created out of individual collections. Nevertheless, this Among the wives, Karoline Luise, interest remained bound to the special path of the fine arts was not Margravine of Baden-Durlach, owner. lost: on the one hand, syntheses of stands out, who showed her art school and art museum were painting cabinet to external guests Secondly, many pre-modern still founded after 1800 (e.g. at the and was intensively involved in the collections had a direct didactic “Pohlhof” in Altenburg/Thuringia princely natural history cabinet. In context. University professors in 1848), and on the other hand, German universities, there were no collected illustrative material for the synthesis of schools of applied female professors before the 20th their courses, which led to the art with corresponding museums century and no female students creation of corresponding cabinets. spread (following a precursor from (with extremely rare exceptions). Johann Daniel Major (1634–1693) 1844, the Minutoli Collection in The situation in the art academies already distinguished two room Liegnitz/Silesia). was slightly better. Katharina Treu functions for this purpose, (1743–1811) taught at the Electoral a hall with collection cabinets Fourthly, a special attitude of the Academy of Art in Düsseldorf from on the walls and a “conference public should not be forgotten, 1776. She could be described as hall”.8 In the 18th century, these the sightseeing. As a combination the first German professor to teach cabinets increasingly became the of supervision and information from exhibits, but she remains an responsibility of the universities, for those interested, the guided isolated case. Management duties an early example being the Royal tour emerged. It reached the field depended on the main profession; if of action of the “pre-modern” light caretaker duties in residential als sozialer Raum. Art, education, cultural museums via the visit to the palaces were readily given to war work, communities. Wien: Turia + Kant, 2002, pp. 198–211; here p. 199. castle: princely castles, but also invalids, the staff was recruited 8 JEKSTIES, Angela and Gaetano OEHMICHEN. the princely and municipal from men. In short, if there was Das Museum Cimbricum. In Museum Cimbricum. libraries, offered an option for a “pre-modern museum education” Aspekte des öffentlichen Museumswesens in Schleswig-Holstein 1689–1980. Kiel: Christian- leisure activities. Visitors were not at all, women had a place in it only Albrechts-Universität, 1989, pp. 77–97. only travellers with an interest as isolated cases. 79
MUSEOLOGIC A BRUNENSIA 19th century: new pedagogical events to make better use of the profession is irrelevant for the event formats, new actors collections. history of museum education. The literature suggests the Additional budget from a funding The format of guided museum Senckenberg Nature Museum in foundation made an expansion tours continued. A series of Frankfort on the Main as a starting possible in 1854: now external lectures by Dr. Eduard Gerhard on point for museum education in experts could receive fees for representations of Greek mythology Germany. Frankfort was one of lectures. Every three years, in sculpture and vase painting, the “free cities” in the German later every two years, the which this museum official gave Confederation, so it was not ruled Natural Research Society held in 1834/35 in the Royal Museum by a monarchy but by a bourgeois a public lecture cycle with a fixed (today: “Altes Museum”), is oligarchy. The Nature Museum, curriculum, and mineralogy was considered to be the beginning of founded in 1817, functioned in added as a new field of knowledge. guided tours of museums in Berlin. a similar way: the members of the The group of participants Around 1900, the Royal Museums Senckenberg Natural Research comprised 20–30 people each time, in Berlin established public Sunday Society committed themselves to mainly teachers and secondary tours: The respective museum the museum in their free time. One school pupils, students, doctors directors or curators realised this of the 17 founding members was and pharmacists. The new offer as a service task. In addition, the master tailor Johann Christoph building of the Nature Museum in a semi-governmental organisation Fritz (1781–1835), who used his 1908 contained separate classrooms (“Centralstelle für Arbeiter- professional skills in the museum as for the now one-year courses. The Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen”) had a taxidermist. In 1826, the general facility also allowed microscopy been organising free guided tours meeting commended him for using and dissection exercises.11 The in various Berlin museums since the permanent exhibition of the model of university lectures 1896.13 Nature Museum as a classroom on and seminars is unmistakable. Sunday mornings, before the public Nothing is known about teaching This external organisation planned hours, to “give lessons in natural contributions by women for the and marketed museum tours on history to a number of boys and entire period. Sunday afternoons, especially for awaken a love for it”.9 workers. Initially, the museum An argument from the history directors held these tours In the same year, 1826, the city of museum education reminds themselves, but due to demand, of Frankfort granted an annual us that many German museums interested high school teachers subsidy of 1,500 guilders to found came into being through civic were recruited as guides.14 The a natural history teaching institute. engagement and that among same organisation organised The Natural Research Society these initiators, teachers were a conference on popular art developed half-year courses with a prominent group. However, this education in Berlin in 1900. The three lessons per week covering still does not clarify whether it was keynote address was given by the the three fields of knowledge: a matter of teachers’ historical or Hamburg museum director Alfred botany, zoology and comparative scientific leisure interests or school Lichtwark, although he himself anatomy. The target group was now pedagogical interests. The high admitted that he was skilled in adults and high school students. level of involvement of teachers in lecturing but had never conducted Responsibility for this teaching was history associations rather points a guided tour of an art exhibition. taken over by another founding to private inclinations. As positive He identified as particular problems member, the physician Dr. Philipp evidence, only one museum director the lack of training of the guiding Jakob Cretzschmar, until 1845.10 and drawing teacher is currently staff and the tendency of the The logic of the university museums known who used museum objects scientific staff to offer too much was thus reversed: no collections as models for his drawing lessons.12 historical knowledge.15 to support teaching, but teaching The museum history has not shown any evidence of female teachers 13 SCHOTTMÜLLER, Frida. Berliner interested in museums, so the Museumsführungen seit 100 Jahren. Berliner Museen. Berichte aus den preußischen early feminisation of the teaching Kunstsammlungen, 1935, vol. 56, pp. 39–40. 9 KRAMER, Waldemar. Chronik der Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden Gesellschaft 14 ALBRECHT, Heinrich. Fünf Jahre praktisch- 1817–1966. Frankfurt a. M.: SNG, 1967, pp. 193, sozialer Thätigkeit. Aus der Versuchsituation der 239. 11 Ibid. Centralstelle für Arbeiter-Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen. Berlin: Heymann, 1898, pp. 34, 36. 10 SCHÄFER, Wilhelm. Geschichte 12 WEIß, Gisela. Sinnstiftung in der Provinz. des Senckenberg-Museums im Grundriß. Westfälische Museen im Kaiserreich. Paderborn: 15 Die Erziehung des Volkes auf den Gebieten Frankfurt a. M.: SNG, 1967, pp. 134–135. Schöningh, 2005, p. 266. der Kunst und Wissenschaft. Vorberichte 80
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 At the first ever nationwide seems noteworthy that the focus occurred in Leipzig in the circle museum conference in Germany, was on teaching school children. of elementary school teachers, in Mannheim in 1903, guided The children may have been who at that time had no academic tours were a major topic. Two female, but the actors were not: qualifications but were trained speakers who both had the title of the corresponding section in the in special teacher seminars. professor and a doctorate embodied Mannheim conference proceedings The central figure was Richard the conflict already addressed by was entitled “Judgments of the Buch (1871–1959), who had been Lichtwark. The high school director guiding gentlemen on the guided working as an elementary school Trendelenburg recited: tours” and 30 men contributed. teacher since 1892 and at the same time undertook zoological research “Yes, if there were a choice between The background to this fact is as an amateur. He was one of the a guide with a high level of that in Germany only the nature initiators of the Leipzig Museum of expertise and one with pedagogical museums have a long tradition Natural History, which the Leipzig experience, I would unhesitatingly of university-educated directors. Teachers’ Association decided to give preference to the latter even The other types of museums were found in 1906 and which opened if his expertise were not entirely academised in Germany in the in 1912 under Buch’s direction. In impeccable. For it seems to me that last third of the 19th and early 20th 1916, Buch wrote: “It was clear what matters more than this in centuries: Many museums were from the outset that the focus of these tours is the pedagogical tact, given their first full-time museum the new institute was to be its which does not place the emphasis directors, and in the painting educational, i.e. its task of teaching on what attracts the scientific galleries, visual artists were and educating the people.”20 Buch researcher, but allows the guide to displaced as museum directors. used the term museum education confine himself to what is the main New humanities disciplines extensively, but he understood it thing and is self-evident to the emerged. Some of them began to mean the selection of exhibits, simple mind.”16 with the personal union of their arrangement and labelling; university professor and museum he called it a “presentation which The opposite position was director (e.g. ethnology), others was worked out in the manner taken by Felix von Luschan, successfully claimed museums as of museum education”.21 In the director’s assistant at the Royal their workplace (e.g. art history). Leipzig Teachers’ Association, Museum of Ethnology, Berlin: Since women were only admitted personal forms of mediation to regular university studies in were called “popular education” “I attach the greatest importance Germany between 1900 and 1908, (“Volksbildung”). Teachers were to guided tours by real experts and there could only be “guiding provided with preparatory material consider them to be one of the most gentlemen”. In the first decade of for school classes, and group visits important means of education. [...] the 20th century, the first female by clubs or youth organisations On the other hand, I consider tours academics worked in German received an introductory lecture by non-experts to be completely museums in unpaid trainee by Buch or another teacher. For useless. I very often see large school positions.18 a teachers’ association, it was classes being rushed through the far-fetched to think of special entire Museum of Ethnology in one First half of the 20th century: educational staff in the museum. or two hours. I think that’s quite new terminology, but no full- nonsensical, and I’m sure it would time professional staff The focus on school education be much more useful for the solidified in the 20th century. children if they spent that time The German term ‘museum The first conference on museum walking around.”17 education’ (“Museumspädagogik”) education in Germany was marginally appeared in organised in 1929 by the “Central In addition to the contrast between a voluminous manual on German educators and subject scholars, it culture published in 1912.19 The ihre Ziele. Vol. 1, part 1. Berlin: Teubner, 1912, first multiple use of the term pp. 632–692; here p. 678. und Verhandlungen der 11. Konferenz [der 20 BUCH, Richard. Ein naturkundliches Centralstelle für Arbeiter-Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen], 18 GRÜTTEL, Else. Weibliche Volksmuseum. Museumskunde. Zeitschrift für 23.–24. 4. 1900. Berlin: Heymann, 1900, Museumsangestellte. Museumskunde. Zeitschrift Verwaltung und Technik öffentlicher und privater pp. 120–121. für Verwaltung und Technik öffentlicher und privater Sammlungen, 1916, vol. 12, pp. 68–90; here p. 69. 16 Die Museen als Volksbildungsstätten. Ergebnisse Sammlungen, 1913, vol. 9, pp. 219–224; here 21 BUCH, Richard. Das Leipziger Naturkundliche der 12. Tagung der Centralstelle für Arbeiter- p. 223. Heimatmuseum. In SCHOENICHEN, Walter (ed.). Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen. Berlin: Heymann, 1904, 19 DIELS, Hermann. Die Organisation der Heimatmuseen. Wesen und Gestaltung. Berlin- p. 168. Wissenschaft. In HINNEBERG, Paul (ed.). Die Lichterfelde: Bermühler, 1928, pp. 111–150; here 17 Ibid., p. 184. Kultur der Gegenwart. Ihre Entwicklung und p. 118. 81
MUSEOLOGIC A BRUNENSIA Institute for Education and eyes of the young people were Gallery and the Collection of Teaching”, financed by the Prussian to “walk” in the picture, she Sculptures of the Royal Museums state. Franz Hilker, a retired wanted to help them “get into the in Berlin (later: State Museums) school inspector from Berlin, scene” in order to understand the began: she researched, wrote propagated two innovations, the composition and to be able to trace scholarly publications and “working and teaching room” in it summarily on paper.24 catalogues of holdings, negotiated the museum and the “museum with art dealers in Italy; along teacher”, a “pedagogically qualified Prof. Dr. Frida Schottmüller (1872– the way, she wrote some fifty museum expert”. Hilker strove to 1936) represented the perspective of articles for the dictionary of artists avoid controversy, with the opinion the academic staff, but accepted that “Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon” that art teachers could manage in an art museum whose collections edited by Thieme and Becker. She without the help of the “museum were no longer being expanded, continued to earn her living as teacher”, while teachers of other a “pedagogue with an understanding a drawing teacher and also taught subjects would be grateful for of art and good taste” could be at the socialist adult education support. In Hilker’s opinion, subject imagined as director. As a rule, she centre (“Volkshochschule”) in scholars and teachers of all types of rejected this solution, since the new Berlin. In 1919, the Prussian schools and subjects were suitable acquisitions required art-historical government honoured the academic for employment as “museum expertise. Obviously, Schottmüller achievements of the ‘auxiliary teachers”.22 The first “classrooms” saw her topic “museum and guided worker’ by awarding her the title of in German museums are mentioned tours for schoolchildren” as a matter professor. for Clausthal-Zellerfeld (1934) for the director. For the Prussian and the State Folklore Museum State Museums in Berlin, however, It was not until 1920 that she (Volkskundemuseum) in Berlin she conceded that because of the received a permanent position as (1935).23 large number of schools in Berlin, curator at the Kaiser-Friedrich- museum specialists could not lead Museum. Official conflicts were Surprisingly, the 1929 conference class tours. Instead, the Prussian inevitable: Schottmüller was used included two women. Both had an State Museums offered further to speaking directly to the Director academic background, both spoke training in art history for teachers; General Wilhelm von Bode. With about museum tours for children. seminars on art viewing with her regular employment, the Edel Noth (1895–1984) was trained different age groups were planned department director Dr. Theodor as a teacher of home economics, as a new offering. Schottmüller Demmler became her superior; needlework and gymnastics, also presented London museums as he reprimanded Schottmüller attended courses at art schools exemplary because specially trained for maintaining direct contact and worked mainly as a teacher staff offered guided tours for the with Bode. One may speculate at girls’ schools from 1919. She general public as well as for school that the employee’s professional presented her own programmes classes.25 reputation and her professorial for ten to sixteen-year-olds at title were part of the problem. As different art exhibitions or at the Schottmüller is the main forerunner the result in 1925, Schottmüller Kaiser-Friedrich-Museum (today: of professional museum education kept the title of curator of the “Bode-Museum”), Berlin. The legal in Germany. She was a qualified sculpture collection, but she was framework of the events remains drawing teacher, attended the given another workspace outside unclear: different exhibitions were University of Berlin from 1899 to the museum and a new task: she the target, the participants visited 1903 as a guest student (women had to organise the guided tours different types of schools and were not yet admitted to regular and lectures in the State Museums. schools, Noth worked as a teacher. studies in Prussia), and in 1903 she Schottmüller organised her work as The timing on Saturday afternoons obtained a doctorate in art history coordinator, programme director indicated a leisure activity. Noth at the University of Zurich. In and publicity department. Her was not at all concerned with November 1905, a long series of involvement ranged from procuring teaching factual knowledge: the work contracts for the Painting folding chairs for seminars in the permanent exhibition to developing 22 HILKER, Franz. Schule und Museum. In 24 NOTH, Edel. Mit Kindern im Museum. In art-historical evening courses, from Zentralinstitut für Erziehung und Unterricht (ed.). Zentralinstitut für Erziehung und Unterricht (ed.). Museum und Schule. Berlin: Hobbing, 1930, pp. Museum und Schule. Berlin: Hobbing, 1930, pp. posters for advertising pillars to 98–110; here pp. 100–101. 120–127. guidelines for guided tours.26 23 HOLST, Niels von. Das Führungswesen in den 25 SCHOTTMÜLLER, Frida. Museum und Berliner Museen. Berliner Museen. Berichte aus den Schülerführungen. In Zentralinstitut für preußischen Kunstsammlungen, 1936, vol. 57, pp. Erziehung und Unterricht (ed.). Museum und 26 NÜTZMANN, Hannelore. Ein Berufsleben. 43–50, here p. 46. Schule. Berlin: Hobbing, 1930, pp. 111–119. Frida Schottmüller. Mitteilungen des 82
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 Schottmüller apparently did education department in Germany. technology in its entire scope” not have a budget. Her main Frida Schottmüller retired a year could be taught at university.32 achievement was to increase the later, allegedly at her own request.28 Everything else should be learned number of tours offered at no cost. through professional practice. Before she took up her post, there Langsdorff’s successor in the Museum education thus remained were 24 public guided tours by External Office published within the official duties of the museum directors and curators per a misogynist text in 1936 that academic staff (or served as extra quarter, in 1932 there were 58. held up Berlin tours by “young income for their junior generation). Since 1932, there was a new service researchers and museum called “tours by scientific auxiliary professionals” as an advantage The professional reality in workers”, which was also declared over the offerings of special these years became precisely as a qualification: ‘auxiliary museum education departments comprehensible for the first time workers’ referred on the one hand abroad (he wrote the department through the “Yearbook of German to people with a specific work task denomination in English and Museums”, which provided detailed for a meagre fee (like Schottmüller French); he merely conceded that personnel data. For 1929, various herself for a long time) and on the the “incidentally mostly ‘female’ professions were indicated in other hand to young university [sic!] museum instructors” in the 1,504 museums, but no museum graduates who were involved in US had “a certain even practice education. The Goethe Museum museum work for several months in guiding” that the ‘auxiliary in Frankfurt am Main listed three without pay. The demand from workers’ lacked.29 guides, the German Museum on external groups for guided tours Health and Safety at Work in Berlin on desired dates was satisfied by The educational activity repertoire four “guides and craftsmen”.33 charging a fee for this and passing of the time was clear: guided Obviously, mediation tasks were it on to the ‘auxiliary worker’ tours and slide lectures were the fulfilled alongside other activities. who did the tour. In museums important formats. Edel Noth alone that did not employ ‘auxiliary presented new forms. School classes Only a few women can have workers’, tours with students were were an important target group, been given this secondary task offered. Full-time museum staff but not the only one. Pedagogical of museum education, because in were responsible for checking knowledge or even routine were 1929 a total of 57 women were the students’ level of knowledge.27 not the focus, although the term listed among the museum staff. Financial possibilities controlled “museum teacher” was formulated The real number was higher, as this system; promotion of women at the same time: Compared to the information provided by the was only possible in individual pedagogical professionalism, the museums varied in detail: the cases, basically the low proportion audience’s contact with a young Hamburg Ethnological Museum of women among students and researcher “who has a living alone listed ten cleaning women graduates dictates the gender ratio. relationship with his subject” (included here), while most received a higher rating.30 The museums listed no cleaning staff These tasks were taken away from usefulness of a special qualification at all. In addition, abbreviations Schottmüller in April 1934 and was disputed: “Guiding in made the gender invisible in assigned, along with press relations, a museum can only be learned to the numerical data of persons to Prof. Dr. Alexander Langsdorff, a limited extent”, Schottmüller with simple jobs. Apart from curator of the prehistoric wrote.31 The Düsseldorf museum administrative staff and cleaners, department who, as a member of director Karl Koetschau explained the following were named as the SS, seemed more trustworthy in 1918 that only “museum female: seven museum directors to the Nazi regime. In the same (including two part-time directors, year, this secondary activity was 28 NÜTZMANN, Hannelore. Ein Berufsleben. one museum benefactress and Frida Schottmüller. Mitteilungen des made independent as the “External Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Florenz, 1996, vol. 40, two unpaid directors), six civil Office of the Berlin Museums”, pp. 236–244; here pp. 240–241. servants, four assistants, one “art and Langsdorff thus became the 29 HOLST, Niels von. Das Führungswesen in den caretaker”, one draughtswoman, Berliner Museen. Berliner Museen. Berichte aus apparently first head of a museum den preußischen Kunstsammlungen, 1936, vol. 57, pp. 43–50; here p. 50. 32 KOETSCHAU, Karl. Die Vorbildung der Kunsthistorischen Instituts in Florenz, 1996, vol. 40, 30 Ibid. Museumsbeamten. Vortrag, gehalten auf der pp. 236–244. Würzburger Tagung, 29. Mai 1918. Hamburg: 31 SCHOTTMÜLLER, Frida. Museum und Lüdtcke & Wulff, 1918, p. 6. 27 HOLST, Niels von. Das Führungswesen in den Schülerführungen. In Zentralinstitut für Berliner Museen. Berliner Museen. Berichte aus Erziehung und Unterricht (ed.). Museum und 33 SCHRAMM, Albert (ed.). Jahrbuch der den preußischen Kunstsammlungen, 1936, vol. 57, Schule. Berlin: Hobbing, 1930, pp. 111–119; here Deutschen Museen. Vol. 2. Wolfenbüttel: Heckner, pp. 43–50. p. 116. 1929. 83
MUSEOLOGIC A BRUNENSIA one museum assistant and one periodical “School and Museum” In the West, too, little was learned “Fräulein” (unmarried woman) 1966–1990 and a practical manual about gender relations. Among without specifying her occupation. in 1966 and 1976 respectively.35 the published practical reports, Furthermore, two “technical Nothing is known about gender there were reports by women, but assistants” and ten academic relations. Men fulfilled all men held the leading positions, trainees (with a temporary, leadership positions and editorial were the editors of the manual. presumably unpaid job) were listed. tasks. At the Nuremberg Art Education In the full-time museum staff of Centre, there was a male director the Berlin museums, the number In the Federal Republic of Germany, and a permanently employed male of women decreased from three to the locations of several important museum educator in the early one between 1932 and 1935 (one museums set the tone for full- years; for the rest, educational ‘auxiliary worker’ in the National time museum education work. staff worked on a fee basis – Gallery); however, the published Central institutions that created predominantly women who saw names of the ‘auxiliary workers’ are educational offers for the various little opportunity to work alongside incomplete.34 museums were deemed suitable: their families. In retrospect, the in 1961 for the State Museums in museum educator there spoke of Second half of 20th century: West Berlin (without mentioning the “type of housewife interested in local establishment, nationwide the predecessor from 1934 or 1925), art”.37 organisation and the beginning in 1965 for the museums of the of the female precariat city of Cologne, and in 1969 for A female-accentuated the Germanic National Museum niche developed in the In the reconstruction phase after together with the municipal children’s museums. The second of the Second World War, the two museums in Nuremberg. Other these, the Children’s Museum in German states experienced the metropolises followed the example. the Historical Museum of Frankfort establishment of museum education In 1965, the buzzword of the on the Main, established in 1972, as an administrative concept, comprehensive German “education reported exclusively women for as a field of action of museum catastrophe”, from kindergarten its entire existence in 2003, both practice, as an organisational to schools or vocational training among the employees and among unit and as a professional profile. to universities, generated political the numerous freelancers.38 In In keeping with the centralist attention, so that museum Nuremberg, a freelance employee thinking of the GDR, in the education also came into view of the Art Education Centre was 1950s two museums (Museum on the sidelines. The museum involved in a new mobile offer.39 for German History, East Berlin; boom that began at the same time The second wave of founding State Art Collections, Dresden) was based more on historical children’s museums in the that were considered pioneering culture and the competition for 1990s was carried out “almost were initially equipped with appreciation of museum locations, everywhere” by women, mostly in departments for educational work not least on tourist hopes, but private initiatives and therefore and guided tours. After uniform also opened up opportunities for hardly under personal profit methods for “cultural mass work” new museum education jobs in motives.40 were ordered in the “Principles the general expansion. In 1973, on the Socialist Transformation of there were the first informal COMMANDEUR, Beatrix, Hannelore KUNZ- Local History Museums” (1960), meetings of museum educators, in OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). Handbuch Museumspädagogik. Kulturelle Bildung in Museen. museum education departments 1982 the first, still thin, issue of München: Kopaed, 2016, pp. 76–83. or specialised workplaces the professional journal “Standbein 37 ROOS, Julia. Ausstellungen als öffentliches were also established in other Spielbein”, which is still published Ärgernis? Die bundesdeutsche Museumskontroverse museums in the country. In 1963, today, was available, and in der 1970er-Jahre um das Präsentieren von Vergangenheiten. Berlin: Bibspider, 2018, pp. a national advisory body was 1981 the first edition of the manual 133–134. created, first under the name “Handbuch Museumspädagogik” 38 GESSNER, Susanne. Dokumentation zum “Working Group School and was published.36 30. Jubiläum des Kindermuseums. Ein Museum für Kinder im Museum. Frankfurt a. M.: Museum”, 1970–1990 as “Working Kindermuseum des Historischen Museums, 2003. Group Museum Education”, 35 SCHNEE, Ines. Museumspädagogik in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik (DDR) bis 39 ROOS, Julia. Ausstellungen als öffentliches which published an annual 1990. In COMMANDEUR, Beatrix, Hannelore Ärgernis? Die bundesdeutsche Museumskontroverse KUNZ-OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). Handbuch der 1970er-Jahre um das Präsentieren von Museumspädagogik. Kulturelle Bildung in Museen. Vergangenheiten. Berlin: Bibspider, 2018, pp. 549. München: Kopaed, 2016, pp. 66–75. 34 SCHRAMM, Albert (ed.). Jahrbuch der 40 KÖNIG, Gabriele. Kinder- und Jugendmuseen Deutschen Museen. Vol. 5. Wolfenbüttel: Heckner, 36 WEIß, Gisela. Museumspädagogik in der und Museen als Orte für alle Generationen. 1932; Vol. 6, 1934. Bundesrepublik Deutschland bis 1990. In In BOCKHORST, Hildegard, Vanessa-Isabelle 84
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 Up to the present: quantitative a whole did not increase so much, an exclusive touch (“guided tour growth in the boom crisis employment did not necessarily by the director” at a higher fee). mean a permanent job or “Curator’s tours” approximate art Since German unification in 1990, a full-time position – 698 of the and research; the actual discourse museums have gone through an 1,437 regularly employed educators accentuates the artistic practice of ongoing boom crisis: the number of had only a half-time position in curators and distances these tours museums grew faster than demand, 2017. The largest group among from “pedagogy” and museum the national average of visitor the 10,899 people who worked education. numbers per museum declined for pay in museum education in by 6.3 % (1993–2013). Apart 2017 was made up of freelancers Conclusion: instead of from spectacular new buildings who only worked (and were paid) women’s emancipation in for some bigger institutions, it on demand. Since selective offers museums, causal chains in the was a period of founding small played a major role (action days, labour market museums: between 1993 and 2013, museum festivals, programmes Germany got 814 new museums during school holidays), many The field of museum education run by private associations. On freelancers received income from in Germany did not show any the former territory of the GDR, the museum only occasionally emancipatory striving for jobs museums lost 40 % of their staff. or seasonally. The second largest for women (about 1900) nor Unlike the western museum boom group in 2017, 2,257 people, an echo effect of early women of the 1970s–1980s, the sum of consisted of low-income earners teachers (18th, 19th centuries) or public funds increased slowly and (student assistants and “mini-jobs” the feminisation of the different disproportionately to the museum limited to a maximum income of teaching professions (20th century). numbers.41 €400 per month).43 Men introduced the technical term museum education in Germany, In 1992, the German museum Guided museum tours show men were the first to discuss the statistics counted 358 museums a multidirectional development. right qualifications for museum among 3,002 responding museums They are criticised today (“frontal guides. The first full-time head of with at least one regularly teaching on the move”), their a museum education department employed museum educator ready-made presentation of in Germany (1925) came about and a total of 505 persons (plus information contradicts basic rather accidentally when internal 3,565 freelancers). In 2007, pedagogical principles. The quarrels with a woman were ended there were already 682 of professional museum education by removing Frida Schottmüller 3,613 responding museums with elaborated a variety of alternative from her original tasks. The formal a total of 991 regularly employed formats. Nevertheless, guided establishment of the department educators and 6,923 freelancers. tours are still the most common led to male staffing. The factually In 2017, there were 823 out of form of presentation: 82.1 % educational work was fulfilled 4,237 responding museums with of the 4.237 German museums by the existing academic (largely a total of 1,437 regularly employed responding in 2017 offered guided male) staff. educators and 7,205 freelancers.42 tours; programmes for school This quantitative increase as classes got the second rank with Apart from isolated cases, women well included a boom crisis. 49.5 %.44 Large museums draw did not appear in German museum Because capital investment as a conceptual line between “museum education until it had received its education” and “visitor service” first local structures and the first REINWAND and Wolfgang ZACHARIAS (eds.). (standard guided tours that can explicit full-time positions (for Handbuch Kulturelle Bildung. München: Kopaed, be called up). On the other hand, men). The parallel development in 2012, pp. 669–671. it is still common for the museum East and West and the GDR’s lead 41 WALZ, Markus. Von der deutschen Vereinigung zur Boomkrise der Gegenwart. management and those responsible in time refute that the second In WALZ, Markus (ed.). Handbuch Museum. for temporary exhibitions to offer phase of the women’s emancipation Geschichte – Aufgaben – Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2016, pp. 69–75. guided tours. But the character of movement (in the 1960s of West 42 HAGEDORN-SAUPE, Monika. these “official tours” changed in Germany) would have affected the Museumspädagogik in Zahlen. In COMMANDEUR, the last decades. Some of them got establishment of museum education. Beatrix, Hannelore KUNZ-OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). Handbuch Museumspädagogik. Kulturelle Bildung in Museen. München: Kopaed, 2016, pp. 43 Statistische Gesamterhebung an den Museen Obviously, neither a longer der Bundesrepublik Deutschland für das Jahr 2017. 362–368; Statistische Gesamterhebung an den Berlin: Institut für Museumsforschung, 2018, pp. perspective of museum history nor Museen der Bundesrepublik Deutschland für das Jahr 2017. Berlin: Institut für Museumsforschung, 53–54. general theses on the increasing 2018, pp. 53–54. 44 Ibid., p. 60. participation of women in the 85
MUSEOLOGIC A BRUNENSIA labour market are able to explain amounting to several thousand 15 people who completed a museum the gender-unbalanced situation euros. education dissertation between of German museum education. 1987 and 2011, none of whom Therefore, a causal chain will be Due to the numerical ratio of people were employed in a museum.47 In sketched here as an explanatory working in museum education, it is 1992, it was reported from south- model. It is based on plausible most likely to get a freelance job for west Germany that many museum arguments not on empirical facts. a few hours or a mini-job. Instead education jobs were temporary and of the “art-interested housewives” many job holders had not worked As a caveat, it should be noted that of the 1970s, we probably find towards this career goal but had there are undoubtedly people who mainly career starters who continue taken up the position to escape are only willing or able to engage the tight financial framework from unemployment.48 in limited gainful employment, their studies in order to gain initial and that it is entirely possible experience in the museum with This structure receives its female to earn a good income from the hope of getting a full-time job accent from the outside. Hidden freelance museum education work. later (in or also outside of museum power issues and influences on Nevertheless, it is a well-known education). In addition, there are decision-makers could make it phenomenon of German labour people in difficult labour market difficult or impossible to recruit market research that especially situations who are prepared in the women. Today, this is unlikely, in the cultural industries, many longer term to combine a small at least in state and municipal people work in solitary self- amount of time at their desired museums in Germany, due to the employment and earn significantly museum job with other gainful monitored equality of women. below-average incomes. This part of employment. Consequently, women do not meet the cultural industries is considered any obstacle if they are interested a characteristic case of precarious Most of those who have found their in a museum job. As long as family living conditions, where it is first job in this way face the next eye work is predominantly fulfilled assumed that the individual’s old- of the needle: there are six times as by women, women will be more age provision is not sufficient and many people in freelance contracts willing to take on occupations with therefore poverty in old age is or marginal employment as there a small amount of time. For decades, likely later on.45 are full-time professionals, so that cultural studies, humanities and when vacancies arise employers can education have had a strong appeal The basis of this explanatory model choose from an oversupply (besides for young women, and some of the is the labour market. There is conceivable lateral entrants). Since disciplines relevant to museums are a quantitatively insufficient demand every second museum education studied almost exclusively by women for graduates of several museum- position is only a half-time job, (e.g. textile science). Regardless of relevant subjects (e.g. art history many who are looking for a full-time the level of qualification, a majority for decades). The teaching diplomas position will settle for part-time in of women opt for pedagogical in (West) Germany experienced the hope that the contract will be professions: in 2020, 73.1 per cent striking cyclical changes, which, increased later or a full-time job will of teachers at German schools are if negative, provided more people become available elsewhere. female, in primary schools their interested in museum education. As share is highest at 89.4 per cent; a result, there is a constant supply Because employers have mastered with a female quota of 92.9 per cent of young people who, due to a lack these labour market tiers, the (2020),49 kindergarten education is of alternatives in the desired field of coveted full-time museum education museum work, see a limited option positions can be offered and filled Gesprächssituationen. Berlin: Bibspider, 2018, pp. as an opportunity. An indication at the lower end of the pay scale. 11–118; here p. 65. of the willingness to take risks Indications of this are the pay offers 47 WALZ, Markus. Museologische Kenntnisstände involved is that several qualification in German job advertisements for in der Hochschullehre. In WALZ, Markus (ed.). Handbuch Museum. Geschichte – Aufgaben – programmes for museum education museum educators, which often Perspektiven. Stuttgart: Metzler, 2016, pp. activities are constantly offered in remain at the bachelor’s level (data 382–384; here p. 384. Germany, with participation fees from 2005–2014),46 and those 48 DÜRR, Christiane. Biologieunterricht im Museum. Ökologie und Umwelterziehung in Museen im deutschsprachigen Raum. Frankfurt a. 46 BREDEMANN, Antje. Das Tätigkeitsfeld M.: Haag & Herchen, 1992, p. 206. 45 KOLLAR, Elke. Museumspädagogische der Museumspädagogik im Spiegel von Praxisprofile und Berufsbilder. In COMMANDEUR, Stellenanzeigen – Anforderungen und 49 Anteil der weiblichen Lehrkräfte an Beatrix, Hannelore KUNZ-OTT and Karin SCHAD Arbeitgeberleistungen. In BREDEMANN, allgemeinbildenden Schulen in Deutschland (eds.). Handbuch Museumspädagogik. Kulturelle Antje und Claudia RÜTSCHE. Aspekte im Schuljahr 2019/20 nach Schulart [online]. Bildung in Museen. München: Kopaed, 2016, pp. museumspädagogischer Arbeit. Zwei Studien [accessed 2021-08-20]. Available from www: 307–314; here p. 311. zu Personalanforderungen und psychologischen
2 0 2 1 / 10 / 0 2 one of the most gender-unbalanced Bundesverband Museumspädagogik e.V. 2016, pp. 362–368. professions on the German labour [online]. Karlsruhe ISBN 978-3-86736-451-5. market.50 This female majority [accessed 2021-08-20]. Available HILKER, Franz. Schule und Museum. within specific study programmes from www: . Unterricht (ed.). Museum und Schule. socioeconomic situation of young Die Erziehung des Volkes auf den Berlin: Hobbing, 1930, pp. 98–110. families are the main factors Gebieten der Kunst und Wissenschaft. HOLST, Niels von. Das Führungswesen controlling the labour market for Vorberichte und Verhandlungen der in den Berliner Museen. Berliner German museum educators or at 11. Konferenz [der Centralstelle für Museen. Berichte aus den preußischen least its precarious part over the last Arbeiter-Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen], Kunstsammlungen, 1936, vol. 57, decades. 23.–24. 4. 1900. Berlin: Heymann, pp. 43–50. 1900. JEKSTIES, Angela and Gaetano Die Museen als Volksbildungsstätten. OEHMICHEN. Das Museum Cimbricum. BIBLIOGRAPHY: Ergebnisse der 12. Tagung der Centralstelle In Museum Cimbricum. Aspekte des für Arbeiter-Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen. öffentlichen Museumswesens in Schleswig- ALBRECHT, Heinrich. Fünf Jahre Berlin: Heymann, 1904. Holstein 1689–1980. Kiel: Christian- praktisch-sozialer Thätigkeit. Aus der DIELS, Hermann. Die Organisation der Albrechts-Universität, 1989, pp. 77–97. Versuchsituation der Centralstelle für Wissenschaft. In HINNEBERG, Paul KOETSCHAU, Karl. Die Vorbildung der Arbeiter-Wohlfahrtseinrichtungen. Berlin: (ed.). Die Kultur der Gegenwart. Ihre Museumsbeamten. Vortrag, gehalten auf Heymann, 1898. Entwicklung und ihre Ziele. Vol. 1, part 1. der Würzburger Tagung, 29. Mai 1918. Anteil der weiblichen Lehrkräfte an Berlin: Teubner, 1912, pp. 632–692. Hamburg: Lüdtcke & Wulff, 1918. allgemeinbildenden Schulen in https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-663-19508-5_19 KOLLAR, Elke. Museumspädagogische Deutschland im Schuljahr 2019/20 nach DÜRR, Christiane. Biologieunterricht im Praxisprofile und Berufsbilder. In Schulart [online]. Hamburg: Statista, Museum. Ökologie und Umwelterziehung COMMANDEUR, Beatrix, Hannelore 2021 [accessed 2021-08-20]. Available in Museen im deutschsprachigen Raum. KUNZ-OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). from www: . Lehrerinnen. Historiographische KÖNIG, Gabriele. Kinder- und BREDEMANN, Antje. Das Tätigkeitsfeld Herausforderungen und internationale Jugendmuseen und Museen als Orte der Museumspädagogik im Spiegel von Perspektiven. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, für alle Generationen. In BOCKHORST, Stellenanzeigen – Anforderungen und 2006, vol. 52, pp. 319–337. Hildegard, Vanessa-Isabelle REINWAND Arbeitgeberleistungen. In BREDEMANN, ISSN 0044-3247. and Wolfgang ZACHARIAS (eds.). Antje und Claudia RÜTSCHE. Aspekte Fachkräftebarometer Frühe Bildung [online]. Handbuch Kulturelle Bildung. München: museumspädagogischer Arbeit. Zwei Zahl des Monats: Februar 2020 [accessed Kopaed, 2012, pp. 669–671. Studien zu Personalanforderungen und 2021-08-20]. Available from www: ISBN 978-3-86736-330-3. psychologischen Gesprächssituationen. . Senckenbergischen Naturforschenden ISBN 978-3-946911-03-6. GESSNER, Susanne. Dokumentation zum Gesellschaft 1817–1966. Frankfurt a. M.: BUCH, Richard. Das Leipziger Naturkundliche 30. Jubiläum des Kindermuseums. SNG, 1967. Heimatmuseum. In SCHOENICHEN, Ein Museum für Kinder im Museum. LÜDTKE, Helga. Anspruchsvolle Arbeit Walter (ed.). Heimatmuseen. Wesen und Frankfurt a. M.: Kindermuseum des für „bedürfnislose“ Frauen. Die ersten Gestaltung. Berlin-Lichterfelde: Bermühler, Historischen Museums, 2003. Bibliothekarinnen in Deutschland. In 1928, pp. 111–150. ISBN 978-3-89282-042-0. LÜDTKE, Helga (ed.). Leidenschaft und BUCH, Richard. Ein naturkundliches GRÜTTEL, Else. Weibliche Bildung. Zur Geschichte der Frauenarbeit Volksmuseum. Museumskunde. Zeitschrift Museumsangestellte. Museumskunde. in Bibliotheken. Berlin: Orlanda, 1992, für Verwaltung und Technik öffentlicher Zeitschrift für Verwaltung und Technik pp. 25–52. ISBN 978-3-922166-79-5. und privater Sammlungen, 1916, vol. 12, öffentlicher und privater Sammlungen, MÖRSCH, Carmen. Am Kreuzungspunkt pp. 68–90. 1913, vol. 9, pp. 219–224. von vier Diskursen: Die documenta HAGEDORN-SAUPE, Monika. 12 Vermittlung zwischen Affirmation, studie/1129852/umfrage/frauenanteil-unter-den- Museumspädagogik in Zahlen. In Reproduktion, Dekonstruktion und lehrkraeften-in-deutschland-nach-schulart/>. COMMANDEUR, Beatrix, Hannelore Transformation. In MÖRSCH, Carmen 50 Fachkräftebarometer Frühe Bildung [online]. KUNZ-OTT and Karin SCHAD (eds.). (ed.). Kunstvermittlung II. Zwischen Zahl des Monats: Februar 2020 [accessed 2021- 08-20]. Available from www: . Bildung in Museen. München: Kopaed, auf der documenta 12. Zürich; Berlin: 87
You can also read