EFFECTS OF METABIOTIC BACILLUS SUBTILIS FOR MICROBIOCENOSIS FORMATION IN EARLY-WEANED PIGLETS

 
CONTINUE READING
Bulgarian Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 2021 ONLINE FIRST
                                                ISSN 1311-1477; DOI: 10.15547/bjvm.2021-0062

                                                                                 Original article

          EFFECTS OF METABIOTIC BACILLUS SUBTILIS FOR
         MICROBIOCENOSIS FORMATION IN EARLY-WEANED
                           PIGLETS

                         V. POPOV, N. NAUMOV & G. SVAZLYAN
             Kursk Federal Agrarian Scientific Center, Kursk, Russian Federation

Summary
Popov, V., N. Naumov & G. Svazlyan, 2021. Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for mi-
crobiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets. Bulg. J. Vet. Med. (online first).

This paper discusses the results of research related to cultivation of the probiotic microorganism B.
subtilis on a grain-based nutrient medium of naked oat (Avena nuda) and studies the possibility of
using metabolites as a liquid dietary supplement to correct microbiocenosis gastrointestinal tract dis-
orders in early-weaned piglets. The weight fraction of proteinogenic amino acids in the experimental
probiotic suspensions was determined by means of capillary electrophoresis. The metabolic activity of
Bacillus subtilis DSM-32424 strain was studied on both sprouted as well as non-sprouted naked oat
(Avena nuda) ‘Nemchinovsky’ variety grain-based nutrient medium. It was proved that the maximum
microbial count reached 4.9×107 CFU/cm3 on the 6th day of cultivation on the medium based on
sprouted naked oat. The use of dietary supplement based on Bacillus subtilis DSM-32424 strain in
amount of at least 1×109 CFU/pig had a positive impact in terms of the formation of microbiocenosis
in animals at the time of transferring piglets to plant diet.
Key words: dietary supplement, Enterobacteriaceae, metabiotics, microbiocenosis, nutrient
medium, piglets, probiotics

INTRODUCTION

Probiotics are living microorganisms and               microorganisms in nature is manifested,
substances of microbial origin able to                 among other ways, through their antago-
provide beneficial effects on physiological            nism. Antagonism consists in the fact that
functions and biochemical reactions of the             bacteria from one species, when develop-
body given the natural process of their                ing together with another species, can
administration (Shenderov, 2013; Paja-                 inhibit its vital activities. This bacterial
rillo et al., 2015; Ardatskaya et al., 2017;           property is of practical use in veterinary
Plotnikova, 2018).                                     medicine owing to the use of bacteria as
     Published research (Patel & DuPont,               probiotics. It is proved that the wide-
2015; Bai et al., 2017; Rusaleyev et al.,              spread administration of various probiotic
2019) suggest that the interaction between             products from living lactobacilli and bifi-
Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for microbiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets

dobacteria in veterinary and medical prac-             sential role of ‘normal microflora’ for the
tice over the past decades has resulted in             formation of microbiocenosis of gastroin-
decrease of their therapeutic action,                  testinal tract in animals (Sánchez et al.,
prompting scientists to seek novel and                 2016). Microflora is directly involved in
more effective microorganisms with pro-                digestive processes, and produces en-
biotic properties (Rusaleyev et al., 2019).            zymes necessary for metabolism of pro-
    It is noteworthy that alongside the                teins, carbohydrates, lipids and nucleic
search for more effective probiotics, a                acids. When autoflora is dying out, the
scientific justification was developed in              body system digests and absorbs it as a
support of the administration of metabiot-             source of protein (Pritychenko et al.,
ics as an extension of the probiotic con-              2012; Bekhtereva et al., 2014; Uyeno et
cept. Thus, the elaboration of the probi-              al., 2015; Roselli et al., 2017).
otic concept through the study and use of                   Consequently, the production of me-
metabiotics of probiotic microorganisms                tabolite-type dietary supplements enriched
in order to develop novel dietary supple-              with cell constituents of bacterial produ-
ments and methods for their use in animal              cers is a relevant topic in the field of bio-
husbandry was implemented (Popov et al.,               technology and animal nutrition.
2020a,b).                                                   The purpose of this research was to
    Metabiotics are a group of medications             study the influence of B. subtilis metabo-
that contain active metabolites (products              lites on the formation of microbiocenosis
of vital functions) of the probiotic cul-              of the gastrointestinal tract in early
tures, among which lysozyme, bacterio-                 weaned piglets.
cins, catalases, enzymes, organic and
amino acids, polypeptides and other com-
                                                       MATERIALS AND METHODS
pounds (Neschilyaev et al., 2016; Sánchez
et al., 2016; Fisinin et al., 2017). In addi-          The research studies took place in the
tion to the bioactive action on the host,              Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology of Fe-
they greatly amplify antagonistic action of            deral State Budgetary Scientific Institu-
the producing probiotic strain, thus creat-            tion Kursk Federal Agrarian Scientific
ing favourable conditions for its vital ac-            Center (FSBSI Kursk FASC) in Kursk,
tivity and integration into the microbiome             the Russian Federation. The grains of na-
community of gastrointestinal tract (Usha-             ked oat (Avena nuda) in its ‘Nemchi-
kov et al., 2015; Uyeno et al., 2015; Ma-              novsky’ variety served as nutrient medium
gomedaliyev et al., 2020).                             in order to produce metabolites in the cul-
    The clinical performance of dietary                ture of Bacillus subtilis DSM-32424
supplements based on probiotic products                strain; and were provided by the Depart-
in the formation of microbiocenosis                    ment of selection and seed farming at
largely depends on biological and chemi-               FSBSI Kursk FASC. All experiments
cal composition of gastrointestinal envi-              were conducted in compliance with ethi-
ronment, and manifests itself only during              cal standards, in accordance with Direc-
the period of administration owing to un-              tive 2010/63/EU of the European Parlia-
favourable conditions for assimilation.                ment and Council of the European union
Thus, it is necessary to look for ways to              as of September 22, 2010  On the protec-
prolong the effect of probiotics’ usage.               tion of animals used for scientific pur-
Still, is it compulsory to highlight the es-           poses).

2                                                                                    BJVM, ××, No ×
V. Popov, N. Naumov & G. Svazlyan

    The nutrient medium used to produce         days were formed, with 15 animals in
metabolites of the Bacillus subtilis DSM-       each group. Group 1 received EPS based
32424 culture contained sprouted and            on sprouted avena; Group 2 received EPS
non-sprouted grains of naked oat (Avena         based on whole-grain avena; Group 3 was
nuda), ‘Nemchinovsky’ variety at the ratio      control. The experimental dietary supple-
of 100 g of crushed raw material per 3 L        ment sample was evaporated in amount of
of water. The substance was gradually           at least 1×109 CFU/mL Bacillus subtilis.
heated up at temperature from 25 to 90 °C       The analysis of microflora composition in
for 6 hours. Then it was left to cool down      faeces took place on the 10th, 25th
naturally. Under control through a pH-          (prenursery piglets) and 40th days (early-
meter, pH was adjusted to 7.5 with a 20%        weaned piglets) of life by means of a
aqueous solution of NaOH. B. subtilis           quantitative cluster analysis of the large
inoculation was done with culture previ-        intestine content (Kondrakhina et al.,
ously standardised in laboratory condi-         2004).
tions up to 1×106 CFU/cm3 at a ratio of 4           Sampling was done directly from the
mL per liter of the prepared nutrient me-       rectum onto sterile dishes. The initial dilu-
dium.                                           tion was obtained in the following way: 1
    Cultivation lasted 14 days in a KBCG        g of the weighed faecal matter was well
100/250 thermostat (Premed, Poland) at          homogenised with 9 mL sterile buffer
37±1 °C. The number of B. subtilis CFU          solution. A number of subsequent dilu-
in the culture fluid was monitored on a         tions were produced with a buffer solution
daily basis on a Levenhuk 740T micro-           from 103 to 1010 of the initial dilution,
scope (Guangzhou Jinghua Optics & Elec-         and then inoculated on the corresponding
tronics Co., Ltd., China), a Levenhuk           nutrient media. Incubation of all grains
M1400 PLUS digital camera (Guangzhou            was performed at 3738 °C. The assay
Jinghua Optics & Electronics Co., Ltd.,         content of bifidobacteria was determined
China) and a pH-meter Kelilong pH-013           using the dilutions of 1051010 diluted in
(Kelilong Instruments, China).                  Blaurock semi-liquid modified hepatic
    The weight fraction of proteinogenic        medium. The Lactobacillus count was
amino acids in experimental probiotic           obtained from dilutions of 105109 in
suspensions (EPS) was determined by             thin fat-free milk. Enterococci were
means of capillary electrophoresis accor-       marked out on the Alkaline polymyxin
ding the procedure stipulated by GOST R         medium for the isolation of enterococci
55569-2013. The calculation of weight           from dilutions of 103107. Staphylo-
fraction of crude protein in g/L was car-       cocci were detected by inoculation on
ried out in accordance with GOST                yolk salt agar (YSA) from dilutions of
32044.1-2012.                                   104106. Yeast-like fungi of the genus
    The scientific and economic analysis        Candida were revealed on the Saburo
of experimental probiotic suspension ef-        medium containing levomycetin from di-
fect on the formation of microbiocenosis        lutions of 103106. Proteus genus mem-
of piglets’ gastrointestinal tract took place   bers were detected on slant agar by
on the premises of the Pig Complex              Shukevich’s method in dilutions of 101 to
‘Nadezhda’ in Kursk region during rear-
                                                104 (Kislenko, 2005). Spore-forming
ing of weaning piglets up to the age of 75
                                                anaerobes (clostridia) were identified by
days. Three groups of piglets aged 10
                                                inoculation of the suspensions of dilutions

BJVM, ××, No ×                                                                             3
Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for microbiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets

102, 105 and 106 into a melted column               nism revealed that the maximum count
of Wilson-Blair agar medium. The total                 reached 4.9×107 CFU/cm3 on the 6th day
aerobic plate count and their haemolytic               of cultivation on the medium based on
properties were analysed after inoculation             sprouted avena. On the 1011th day the
of dilutions of 105107 on 5% blood                  number of CFUs has stabilised around
agar. The potentially pathogenic entero-               1.9-2.0×107 CFU/mL.
bacteriaceae were spotted by inoculation                    The experimental liquid probiotic sus-
of a drop of suspension (0.05 mL) from                 pension was a bioactive product. Its
dilutions of 103108 into four sections of a           physical properties were revealed through
plate containing Levine’s medium. The                  its specific odour and colour. The dyna-
total count of Escherichia was determined              mics of proteinogenic amino acids corre-
from dilutions of 105108 on the Le-                 lated with CFU values of probiotic micro-
vine’s medium. The 103 dilution of was                organism B. subtilis. The analysis of pro-
used for inoculation on Ploskirev’s me-                teinogenic amino acids (Table 1) outlined
dium, and 105 dilution: on Endo agar.                 the culture liquid as an experimental pro-
The specific media involved in the re-                 biotic suspension. It is noteworthy that the
search studies were purchased from the                 weight fraction of crude protein was
Federal Budgetary Institution of Science               slightly different in the experimental sam-
State Scientific Center for Applied Mi-                ples.
crobiology and Biotechnology (FBIS SSC                      It is reasonable to assume that the re-
AMB) in the regional settlement of Obo-                duction of the crude protein was possible
lensk in Serpukhov, Moscow Region,                     owing to fermentation of the naked oat
Russia. The content of all types of micro-             grains during germination. The qualitative
organisms in 1 g of faeces was evaluated               and quantitative composition of the probi-
through the amount of colonies grown on                otic suspension featured the complete
the corresponding medium and taking into               protein content of the suspension enriched
account the inoculum and its dilution.                 with organic acids. Along with that, the
Throughout the research period, the ani-               analysis of indicators (Table 1) demon-
mals experienced no harm.                              strated increase in the activity of B. sub-
    The statistical data processing in-                tilis metabolism after cultivation on a non-
cluded descriptive statistics employing the            sprouted avena-based nutrient medium.
statistical analysis package for Microsoft             The synthesis of lysine was higher when
Excel. The significance of differences                 compared to the sprouted grain control. In
between mean values was evaluated by                   the culture fluid, the amount of amino
Student’s t-test. The differences were con-            acids was within the following ranges:
sidered tatistically significant at P
V. Popov, N. Naumov & G. Svazlyan

Table 1. Indicators of amino acid composition of the probiotic suspension. Values are presented as
mean±SD, n=3

                                   Control          Experiment       Control       Experiment
Indicators                                                                         Sprouted
                                                    Avena with       Sprouted
                                   Avena                                           Avena with
                                                    В. subtilis      Avena
                                                                                   В. subtilis
                                         1                2              3               4
Weight fraction of                  0.80±0.23        0.73±0.31       0.79±0.29     0.70±0.37
crude protein, g/L
           Arginine                14.61±0.40       14.40±1.50*       6.55±0.11     3.87±1.25
           Lysine                   6.91±0.52       9.80±1.80         5.18±0.25     7.67±1.97
Weight fraction of proteinogenic

           Tyrosine                10.31±1.10       12.00±0.90*       6.71±1.12     8.93±1.87
           Phenylalanine            8.70±0.90       9.12±0.70*        4.38±1.35     5.60±1.21
      amino acids, mg/L

           Histidine                5.09±1.30       4.30±1.90         3.45±1.21     2.49±1.37
           Leucine + isoleucine    24.94±0.90       25.19±0.30*      19.04±0.90    15.49±0.50
           Methionine               3.65±1.70       5.81±1.90         3.78±1.25     3.46±1.37
           Valine                  11.65±0.70       12.68±0.80*      13.40±0.70     8.72±1.29
           Proline                 19.27±0.10       22.37±0.30       22.34±0.90    19.97±0.30
           Threonine               14.97±0.90       10.06±1.70*      15.59±0.20     7.89±1.33
           Serine                  20.61±0.90       17.68±1.20*      19.81±0.80    10.83±0.10
           Alanine                 15.13±0.50       20.50±1.40       23.13±0.40    20.49±0.80
           Glycine                 10.32±1.50       18.20±1.60*       7.84±1.58     8.66±1.33

Note: * statistically significant difference at P
6
                 Table 2. Dynamics of microbiocenosis formation in piglets (mean ± SD, n=5)

                                                        Group 1                                       Group 2                                    Group 3
                                                B. subtilis in medium of                       B. subtilis in medium of                          Control
                 Microorganism                    non-sprouted Avena                               sprouted Avena
                 type (CFU/g in
                 faecalis)                                Days                                          Days                                       Days
                                           10             25               40            10             25                40            10         25           40
                                            8                   9               9             8              9                 9          8             8
                 Bifidobacterium     0.2×10 ±       0.23×10 ±       0.31×10 ±       0.20×10 ±      0.25×10 ±      0.36×10 ±        0.20×10 ±   0.27×10 ±    0.30×108±
                                     0.29×108       0.14×109        0.61×109*       0.72×108       0.31×109*      0.61×109*        0.24×108    0.93×108     0.14×108
                 Lactobacillus       0.23×108±      0.71×108±       0.8×108±        0.19×108±      0.82×108±      0.84×108±        0.2×108±    0.53×108±    0.78×108±
                                     0.23×108       0.47×108        0.11×108*       0.06×108       0.91×108*      0.09×108*        0.09×108    0.32×108     0.82×108
                 Enterobacter        0.21×106±      0.23×106±       0.36×106±       0.19×106±      0.21×106±      0.32×106±        0.20×106±   0.30×106±    0.70×106±
                                     0.52×106       0.28×106        0.31×106        0.16×106       0.38×106       0.52×106         0.67×106    0.44×106     0.38×106
                 Proteus             0.65×104±      0.10×105±       0.47×105±       0.73×104±      0.94×104±      0.40×105±        0.70×104±   0.12×105±    0.30×107±
                                     0.33×104       0.11×105        0.51×105        0.46×104       0.82×104       0.06×105         0.31×104    0.09×105     0.41×107
                 Staphylococcus      0.27×104±      0.23×106±       0.93×106±       0.32×104±      0.22×106±      0.87×106±        0.31×104±   0.43×106±    0.90×108±
                                     0.64×104       0.37×106        0.88×106        0.13×104       0.17×106       0.56×106         0.09×104    0.12×106     1.01×108
                 Clostridium         0.30×104±      0.28×105±       0.21×106±       0.27×104±      0.26×106±      0.19×106±        0.27×104±   0.18×106±    0.10×107±
                                     0.17×104       0.19×105        0.07×106        0.61×104       0.17×106       0.21×106         0.12×104    0.09×106     0.06×107
                 Escherichia         0.27×106±      0.31×106±       0.50×106±       0.26×106±      0.30×106±      0.49×106±        0.25×106±   0.35×106±    0.52×106±
                                     0.14×106       0.26×106        0.72×106        0.54×106       0.26×106       0.54×106         0.36×106    0.24×106     0.91×106
                 Salmonella          negative       0.27×102±       0.30×102±       negative       0.20×102±      0.23×102±        negative    0.11×105±    0.17×105±
                                                    0.14×102        0.37×102                       0.39×102*      0.41×102                     0.11×105     0.09×105
                 Candida             negative       negative        0.30×102±       negative       negative       0.27×102±        negative    0.13×103±    0.18×103±
                                                                    0.29×102                                      0.47×102                     0.21×103     0.16×103
                                                                                                                                                                        Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for microbiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets

                 Note: * statistically significant at P≤0.05.

BJVM, ××, No ×
V. Popov, N. Naumov & G. Svazlyan

nistic effect of B. bifidum. It is noteworthy   nutrition of piglets had a significant influ-
that on the 25th day, Salmonella were           ence on the proportion of microorganisms
found in feces of piglets from all three        in gastrointestinal tract microbiocenosis .
groups. Their largest count, i.e. 0.11×105
CFU/g, was registered in controls,
                                                DISCUSSION
whereas the lowest one  in Group 2,
0.2×102 CFU/g, which was by 26% lower           The production of dietary supplements
than that in Group 1.                           based on probiotic microorganisms is
     On the 40th day in Groups 1 and 2, the     based on their metabolites obtained during
largest share of total microbial counts was     culturing on different nutrient media.
that of B. bifidum: 79% and 80.73% re-          Grain-based nutrient media are the best
spectively. Lactobacilli reached 0.4% in        choice for obtaining biologically active
feces of Group 1, and 18.83%  in Group         substances from probiotic microorga-
2. Other types of microorganisms reached        nisms. The outcome of studies in view of
0.52% and 0.43% respectively.                   B. subtilis cultivation are consistent with
     Staphylococci predominated in the          the focus of the research and with the
control group: 44.28% of total count. The       findings of other authors (Parker, 1974;
share of lactobacilli was 38.38%, bifido-       Nguyen et al., 2016).
bacteria were only third with 14.76%. The            However, the production of medicines
share of Proteus was 1.47%, and that of         and dietary supplements based on B. sub-
other types of microorganisms  1.1% of         tilis was done in Russia and Germany only
the total count. When compared to Group         in medical practice (Bactistatin and Hylak
2, the count of bifidobacteria in faeces in     Forte products). The research studies re-
piglets from Group 1 was lower by 13.9%.        lated to the production and administration
In control group 3, the count of bifidobac-     of dietary supplements based on metabio-
teria was lower by 91.7% than in Group 2.       tics in animal husbandry and veterinary
     The present research studies contri-       medicine are at their initial stage of re-
buted to the justification of a reasonable      search (Shenderov, 2013; Lebeer et al.,
opportunity to use Avena nuda as a nutri-       2018).
ent medium to produce metabolites during             Several recent research papers (Plot-
cultivation of the probiotic microorganism      nikova, 2018; Singh et al., 2018) discuss
B. subtilis. Cultivation of the probiotic       an analogue of the capsulated metabiotic
microorganism B. subtilis allowed obtain-       and prove that it can be used to correct
ing a metabolite composition by way of          microbiocenosis gastrointestinal tract dis-
proteinogenic amino acids. The experi-          orders in animals.
mental probiotic suspension when B. sub-             In our research studies, B. bifidum
tilis was cultivated on the grain-based         prevails in formation of microbiocenosis
nutrient medium, both non-sprouted and          in piglets through metabiotics. The use of
sprouted, was a dietary supplement con-         probiotic metabolites, according to some
taining probiotics in an amount of at least     authors, not only stimulates the activity of
2.0×109 CFU/mL                                  enzyme systems, producing beneficial
     Research studies involving animals         effect on metabolism in body systems of
proved that the use of the probiotic sus-       animals, but also improves the ecological
pension of B. subtilis with a grain-based       environment of intestine from physiologi-
nutrient of naked oat (Avena nuda) in the       cal point of view in order to create and

BJVM, ××, No ×                                                                             7
Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for microbiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets

maintain own microflora, as well as regu-              biotic microorganism B. subtilis helps
lates symbiotic relationships with the host            colonisation of microbiome in normal
(Wang, 2014; Patel & DuPont, 2015; Ne-                 intestinal microflora, consistent with other
schilyaev et al., 2016; Bai et al., 2017).             studies (LeBlanc, 2014; Ardatskaya,
    Published research on B. subtilis                  2015; Fedorova et al., 2016; Sánchez et
(Huang, 2013; Orel, 2014; Patel & Du-                  al., 2016).
Pont, 2015; Ardatskaya et al., 2017;
Strekalovskikh & Belousov, 2018) re-
                                                       CONCLUSION
vealed a significant correlation between
the content of Bifidobacterium and Lacto-              The administration of grain-based B. sub-
bacillus, as well as significant negative              tilis probiotic suspension from Avena
correlation between Enterobacterisceae                 nuda to piglets greatly influenced the pro-
and Clostridium perfingens. The results                portion of microorganisms in the micro-
from intestinal microflora studies makes it            biocenosis composition of the gastrointes-
possible to affirm that the use of probio-             tinal tract. In piglets treated with an ex-
tics influences positively microbial com-              perimental probiotic suspension, the con-
position: the count of lactobacilli and bifi-          tent of B. bifidum in faeces was signifi-
dobacteria increases. There is an estab-               cantly higher than in controls. The micro-
lished tendency towards reduction in the               biome was predominantly represented by
number of Escherichia and staphylococci,               bifidobacteria and lactobacilli, with the
and absence of lactose negative Es-                    remaining microflora being less than 1%.
cherichia.                                             A more prominent antagonistic effect was
    The experimental data obtained in                  revealed through B. subtilis on the me-
these studies are consistent with research             dium based on the Avena sprouts.
data (Pajarillo et al., 2015; Sánchez et al.,
2016), confirming the favourable effect of
EPS on formation of microbiocenosis in                 REFERENCES
early-weaned piglets. Throughout the re-
                                                       Ardatskaya, M. D., 2015. Probiotics, prebiot-
search, it was shown that B. bifidum was                  ics and metabolics in correction of mi-
integrated better into microbiome of gas-                 croecological bowel disorders. Medical
trointestinal tract in piglets of Group 2,                Council, 13, 94–99 (RU).
which received suspension enriched with                Ardatskaya, M. D., L. G. Stolyarova, E. V.
probiotic microorganisms grown on                         Arkhipova & O. Yu. Filimonova, 2017.
sprouted avena medium (Nguyen et al.,                     Metabiotics as natural development of
2016).                                                    probiotic conception. Difficult Patient, 15,
    It was demonstrated that the faecal                   35–39 (RU).
count of bifidobacteria in piglets from this           Bai, K., Q. Huang, H. J. Zhang, J. Zhang & T.
Group was by 13.9% higher than that in                     Wang, 2017. Supplemental effects of pro-
Group 1. In controls, bifidobacteria count                 biotic Bacillus subtilis fmbJ on growth
was by 91.7% lower compared to Group                       performance, antioxidant capacity, and
2, proving the active formation of gastric                 meat quality of broiler chickens. Poultry
intestinal microbiocenosis in piglets                      Science, 96, 74–82.
through direct cultivation of B. bifidum in            Bekhtereva, M. K., A. M. Lukyanova & T. S.
the intestinal tract. The experimental pro-              Khorosheva, 2014. Modern approaches to
                                                         rational therapy of bacterial diarrhea. Le-
biotic suspension on the basis of the pro-
                                                         chashchiy Vrach, 12, 54–57 (RU).

8                                                                                    BJVM, ××, No ×
V. Popov, N. Naumov & G. Svazlyan

Belyaev, V., 2020. How Vitacid optimizes the       Kislenko, V. N., 2005. Workshop on Veteri-
   process of digestion in pigs during nursery         nary Microbiology and Immunobiology.
   and fattening. Swine Rearing, 4, 25–26              Kolos-S (RU).
   (RU).                                           Kondrakhina, I. P., A. V. Arkhipova & V. I.
Chae, J. P., E. A. B. Pajarillo, J. K. Oh, H.         Levchenko, 2004. Methods of Veterinary
   Kim & D. Kang, 2016. Revealing the                 Clinical Laboratory Diagnostics: Hand-
   combined effects of lactulose and probiotic        book. Kolos-S (RU).
   enterococci on the swine faecal microbiota      Lebeer, S., P. A. Bron, M. L. Marco, J.-P. Van
   using 454 pyrosequencing. Microbial Bio-           Pijkeren, M. O’Connell Motherway, C.
   technology, 9, 486–495.                            Hill, B. Pot, S. Roos & T. Klaenhammer,
de LeBlanc, A. M. & J. G. LeBlanc, 2014.              2018. Identification of probiotic effector
   Effect of probiotic administration on the          molecules: Present state and future per-
   intestinal microbiota, current knowledge           spectives. Current Opinion in Biotechnol-
   and potential applications. World Journal          ogy, 49, 217–223.
   of Gastroenterology, 20, 1651816528.           Lin, L. & Zhang, J., 2017. Role of intestinal
Fedorova, O. V., A. I. Nazmieva, E. I. Nuret-          microbiota and metabolites on gut homeo-
   dinova & R. T. Valeeva, 2016. Probiotic             stasis and human diseases. BMC Immunol-
   products based on microorganisms of the             ogy, 18, 2.
   genus bacillus. Journal of the University       Magomedaliyev, I. M., R. V. Nekrasov, M. G.
   of Technology, 19, 170–174 (RU).                  Chabaev, V. V. Dzhavakhiya, E. V.
Fisinin, V. I., E. A. Artemieva, I. I.               Glagoleva & M. I. Kartashov, 2020. Influ-
    Chebotarev, G. Yu. Laptev, I. N. Nikonov,        ence of probiotic complex on productive
    L. A. Ilyina, N. G. Mashentseva, A. V.           performance and metabolism in growing
    Savinov, D. L. Klabukova, E. A. Yildirim         pigs. Agrarian Science, 1, 22–26.
    & N. I. Novikova, 2017. Dietary probiotic      Neschilyaev, V. A., P. A. Mokin & T. V.
    Lactobacillus plantarum L-211 for farm            Fedorova, 2016. On development of
    animals. II. The additive for piglets. Agri-      highly effective metabolite probiotics.
    cultural Biology, 52, 418–424 (RU).               Topical Directions of Scientific Research:
GOST 32044.1-2012. Feeds, mixed feeds and             From Theory to Practice, 8, 15–17.
  raw material. Determination of mass frac-        Nguyen, H.-T., D.-H. Truong, S. Kouhoundé,
  tion of nitrogen and calculation of mass            S. Ly, H. Razafindralambo & F. Delvigne,
  fraction of crude protein. Part 1. Kjeldahl         2016. Biochemical engineering approaches
  method;       https://gostperevod.com/gost-         for increasing viability and functionality of
  32044-1-2012.html (RU).                             probiotic bacteria. International Journal of
GOST R 55569-2013. Feedstuffs, compound               Molecular Sciences, 17, 867.
  feeds, feed raw materials. Determination of      Orel, R., 2014. Intestinal microbiota, probiot-
  proteinogenic amino acids using capillary           ics and prebiotics in inflammatory bowel
  electrophoresis; https://gostperevod.com/           disease. World Journal of Gastroenterol-
  gost-r-55569-2013.html (RU).                        ogy, 20, 1150511524.
Hansen, C., 2018. Focusing on early life piglet    Pajarillo, E. A. B., J. P., Chae, M. P. Balolong,
   performance is critical for success. Inter-         H. B.Kim, K.-S. Seo & D.-K. Kang, 2015.
   national Pig Topics, 33, 6–7.                       Characterization of the fecal microbial
Huang, X.-Z., 2013. Bacterial colonization             communities of duroc pigs using 16S
   and intestinal mucosal barrier develop-             rRNA gene pyrosequencing. Asian-Austra-
   ment. World Journal of Clinical Pediat-             lasian Journal of Animal Sciences, 28,
   rics, 2, 4653.                                     584–591.

BJVM, ××, No ×                                                                                    9
Effects of metabiotic Bacillus subtilis for microbiocenosis formation in early-weaned piglets

Parker, R. B., 1974. Probiotics, the other half            ease. Molecular Nutrition & Food Re-
   of the antibiotic story. Animal Nutrition               search, 61, 1600240.
   and Health, 29, 48.                                Shenderov, B. A., 2013. Metabiotics: Novel
Patel, R. & DuPont, H. L., 2015. New ap-                  idea or natural development of probiotic
    proaches for bacteriotherapy: Prebiotics,             conception. Microbial Ecology in Health
    new-generation probiotics, and synbiotics.            & Disease, 24, 10.3402/mehd.v24i0.
    Clinical Infectious Diseases, 60 (Suppl. 2),          20399.
    S108–S121.                                         Singh, A., V. Vishwakarma & B. Singhal,
Plotnikova, E. Yu., 2018. Effects of active               2018. Metabiotics: The functional meta-
    Bacillus subtilis metabolites in a probiotic          bolic signatures of probiotics: Current
    product of the new generation. RMJ Medi-              state-of-art and future research priorities 
    cal Review, 3, 39–44 (RU).                            Metabiotics: Probiotics effector molecules.
Popov, V. S., N. M. Naumov & G. A. Svazlyan,              Advances in Bioscience and Biotechnol-
   2020a. Scientific practical justification and          ogy, 9, 147–189.
   aspects of the use of metabolite probiotics in      Sorokulova, I., 2013. Modern Status and Per-
   correction of microbiocenosis. UlGAU Bul-              spectives of Bacillus Bacteria as Probiot-
   letin, 52, 198–205 (RU).                               ics. Journal of Probiotics & Health, 1, 4.
Popov, V., N. Vorobyeva, G. Svazlyan, N.               Strekalovskikh, A. V. & A. I. Belousov, 2018.
   Naumov & O. Gryaznova, 2020b. Over-                     Scientific rationale for the use of probiot-
   view of metabiotics and probiotic cultures              ics and metabiotics for prevention of gas-
   during fermentation of molasses. System-                trointestinal diseases (literature review).
   atic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11, 813817.                  Youth and Science, 3, 30 (RU).
Potthast, C., S. Brinker &    K. Maier, 2011.          Ushakov, N. A., R. V. Nekrasov, I. V.
    Futtermittel aus der       Zuckerrübenver-            Pravdin, N. V. Sverchkova, E. I. Ko-
    arbeitung – neue Daten    zu Inhaltsstoffen           lomeits & D. S. Pavlov, 2015. Mecha-
    aus einer bundesweiten    Erhebung. Sugar             nisms of influence of probiotics on symbi-
    Industry, 136, 639–669.                               otic digestion. Bulletin of the Russian
Pritychenko, A. V., A. N. Pritychenko & M. P.             Academy of Sciences. Biological Series, 5,
    Babin, 2012. Intestinal microbiocenosis in            468–476 (RU).
    detached piglets. Topical Problems of In-          Uyeno, Y., S. Shigemori, & T. Shimosato,
    tensive Development of Animal Hus-                    2015. Effect of probiotics/prebiotics on
    bandry, 15, 258–263.                                  cattle health and productivity. Microbes
Roselli, M., R. Pieper, C. Rogel-Gaillard, H.             and Environments, 30, 126–132.
   de Vries, M. Bailey, H. Smidt & C.                  Wang, Z.-K., 2014. Intestinal microbiota
   Lauridsen, 2017. Immunomodulating ef-                 pathogenesis and fecal microbiota trans-
   fects of probiotics for microbiota modula-            plantation for inflammatory bowel disease.
   tion, gut health and disease resistance in            World Journal of Gastroenterology, 20,
   pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technol-                14805–14820.
   ogy, 233, 104–119.
Rusaleyev, V. S., О. V. Pruntova & D. A.               Paper received 27.05.2021; accepted for
   Vasilyev, 2019. Cultural morphological              publication 19.07.2021
   and biochemical characteristics of Bacillus         Correspondence:
   subtilis strains. Veterinary Science Today,
   28, 58–62.                                          Victor Popov, DVM
                                                       Kursk Federal Agrarian Scientific Center
Sánchez, B., S. Delgado, A. Blanco-Míguez,             70B Karl Marx Str.,
   A. Lourenço, M. Gueimonde & A. Mar-                 Kursk, 305021, Russian Federation
   golles, 2016. Probiotics, gut microbiota,           e-mail: popov.kfasc@bk.ru
   and their influence on host health and dis-

10                                                                                   BJVM, ××, No ×
You can also read