Consultation on the preparation of a new Seafood Development Programme 2014 2020 - July 2013 - In accordance with Article 5 and Article 87 of ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Consultation on the preparation of a new Seafood Development Programme 2014 - 2020 In accordance with Article 5 and Article 87 of the draft Common Provisions Regulation July 2013
How to respond All submissions should include the completed Annex 1 form which is attached to this document. Additional comments may be appended to the Annex 1 form, but not exceeding 5 pages. Submissions marked “Seafood Development Programme 2 0 1 4 -2 0 2 0 Consultation” in the Subject Line should be sent by email to sdp2014@agriculture.gov.ie Alternatively, you may post your response to Annex 1: WHO IS MAKING THE SUBMISSION? The information you provide in this section will assist the Minister in evaluating the information provided in submission on key questions and the SWOT questionnaire. Personal data will not be used for other purposes. 1. I am making this submission: on my own behalf √ representing an organisation/association/administration 2. I am a: Fisherman Expert/scientist Representative of government body Representative of fishermen association General public Representative of trade association Political representative Representative of an environmental NGO √ Other (please specify) Fisheries Local Action Group (FLAG) 3. My contact information is: Name Southeast Fisheries Local Action Group Address C/O John Hickey, BIM, Stella Maris Centre, Community Kilmore Quay, Co. Wexford. Phone number 087 6295047 Email address hickey@bim.ie If you are a fisherman: Vessel Registration Vessel Name Homeport FREEDOM OF INFORMATION & DATA PROTECTION All submissions are subject to the Freedom of Information Acts and/or the European Communities (Access to Information on the Environment) Regulations 2007 and may also be published on the Department’s website. If any of the detail you have provided is sensitive on the basis that it is personal, confidential, or commercially confidential, please identify it here and give clear reasons why you think it should not be released. The Department will, where possible, consult with you
about any information which you have identified as sensitive information before making a decision in response to a request for release under the Freedom of Information Acts. Annex 2: SWOT Questionnaire SWOT Analysis of the Irish seafood sector Chapter 3 – Sustainable development of fisheries areas/coastal communities This chapter shall indicate the contribution that the Irish fisheries areas and coastal communities will make to the achievement of the following Union priorities: A. Promoting a sustainable and resource efficient fisheries and aquaculture including related processing through the focus on the following specific objectives: 1. reduction of the impact of fisheries on the marine environment; 2. protection and restoration of aquatic biodiversity and ecosystems; 3. enhancement of ecosystems related to aquaculture and promotion of resource efficient aquaculture; 4. promotion of aquaculture with high level of environmental protection and of animal health and welfare and of public health and safety. B. Fostering innovative, competitive and knowledge based fisheries and aquaculture including related processing through the focus on the following specific objectives: 1. support to strengthening technological development, innovation and knowledge transfer; 2. enhancement of the competitiveness and viability of fisheries and aquaculture enterprises, including, in fisheries, of small scale coastal fleet and improvement of safety or working conditions and, in aquaculture, of SMEs in particular; 3. development of new professional skills and lifelong learning; improved market organisation for fishery and aquaculture products; C. Increasing employment and territorial cohesion through the following specific objectives: 1. promotion of economic growth, social inclusion, creation of jobs and supporting labour mobility in coastal and inland communities depending on fishing and aquaculture;
2. diversification of activities within fisheries and into other sectors of maritime economy. What would you consider as the strengths (maximum of 5) of Irish fisheries areas/coastal communities which would aid Ireland’s ability to meet the objectives as described above? 1. Assets of the coastal area including; • Diverse range of high quality seafood products (caught/produced from fisheries and aquaculture) through the southeast FLAG area that can be fished/produced sustainably, with existing onshore added value/employment in some locations in the region. • Also the area is rich in tradition and natural beauty/heritage throughout the Southeast FLAG area (much of which has not been developed/exploited), and has existing marine tourism activities 2. Existing xxperienced workforce in fisheries, aquaculture and marine tourism, and ability of fishermen/coastal dwellers to adapt/upskill to avail of new opportunities for employment such as in servicing the offshore energy and including renewable energy sectors 3. Strategy addressing the short and longer term development of the Southeast (Wicklow, Wexford and Waterford) coastal areas for employment and economic development prepared in consultation with the coastal communities. 4. Local community structures in place in some coastal areas recently established to address issues and drive economic development/employment opportunities 5. Ability to adapt to diversify into new employment/income sectors What would you consider as the weaknesses (maximum of 5) of Irish fisheries areas/coastal communities which would hinder Ireland’s ability to meet the objectives as described above? 1.Unemployment black spots in coastal locations in the region, with some key fisheries closed, such as salmon, eels and sea bas putting pressure on other inshore fisheries such as lobster and crab, that are in danger of being unsustainable 2. Lack of opportunities for fishermen to engage in marine tourism activities to compliment their commercial fishing activities (as is done in other EU member States) due to regulatory system in Ireland 3. Poor infrastructure One of the main harbours in the area (National Fishery Harbour of Dunmore East) not being utilised to its full potential due to silting, preventing larger boats from accessing the harbour. Employment opportunities not available through onshore activities in the harbour due to closing of processing and ancillary services. Lack of adequate landing points and mooring facilities within the region to promote marine tourism and boost commercial landings 4. Poor perception of seafood within domestic market, and lack of marketing infrastructure to enable more direct sales to local higher value outlets with over reliance on traditional bulk export markets 5. Natura sites currently stalling the development of aquaculture and also classification/development of new fisheries (such as shellfish) and poorly perceived by fishermen and coastal communities in general, leading to an overall lack of appreciation for promoting marine heritage to its full potential by different sectors
What would you consider as the external opportunities (maximum of 5) available to Irish fisheries areas/coastal communities which would aid Ireland’s ability to meet the objectives as described above? 1.New employment opportunities for those suitably qualified in servicing the offshore energy (including renewable energy) sector, with suitable training available to meet the demand 2. Provision and promotion of a marine heritage/seafood experience harnessing regional coastal attractiveness, traditional fishing practices, heritage, marine leisure and availability of the variety of locally sourced seafood to grow economic wealth – stay vacations on the increase 3. Growing demand for seafood internationally but also potential to grow awareness of the benefits of seafood and for that locally caught/produced high quality seafood within the domestic market – closeness to large population centres and transport links 4. Potential to involve 3rd level institutions in research and pilot studies with start up diversification projects such as seaweed and fish/gear waste etc. 5. Provide economic potential through stewardship of natural resources, benefiting from GEO park and Natura 2000 sites for marine coastal dwellers What would you consider as the external threats (maximum of 5) to Irish fisheries areas/coastal communities which would hinder Ireland’s ability to meet the objectives as described above? 1. Competition/importation of seafood from outside of Ireland and including from non EU member States, with poor differentiation with Irish caught/produced seafood 2. Lack of investment by Co. Councils and Department in coastal infrastructure 3. Increased pressure on fish stocks due to economic recession leading to increased effort, without necessary safeguards to ensure sustainability of stocks 4. Poor public perception of Fisheries and aquaculture, that all fisheries are under threat, mass produced, lack of provenance, not sustainably/responsibly caught/sourced 5. Loss of traditional fishing methods and skills as fisheries are closed, with a resulting loss of vitality and character/diversity that makes the coastal area attractive to live and for tourism to flourish 10 Key Questions With reference to the 10 key questions the following summaries the position of the Southeast FLAG. The questions answered below are in agreement with those provided by the South west FLAG 1 . What are the problems / issues / opportunities that are best addressed through the next operational programme? Respondents should bear in mind the five Union Priorities referred to above). A comprehensive review of the issues and opportunities facing coastal and fishing communities in the Wicklow, Wexford and Waterford FLAG area is available in the appended strategy
document. Please look to the SWO T for Chapter 3 for some headline issues and opportunities that have been identified. 2 . Do you have any views on Community Led Local Development, Integrated Territorial Investments, or Financial Instruments as implantation tools for the next programming period? The decision making process through the FLAGs (based on the Community Led Development model) recognises and facilitates truly integrated decision on coastal community projects. The network of FLAGs in their approach recognises the significance of scale both in terms of the competition for funding for projects within FLAG areas and in enabling coastal communities to operate at a level that leverages more benefits from the seafood products, assets and services that form the backbone of the community’s economic and therefore social survival. The impact of a project supported at a local level within FLAG areas, it’s potential for growth and capacity for replication in coastal communities nationally is a unique approach in the deployment of funding and support for our coastal communities who are directly or indirectly linked to seafood production. The development of a cross sectoral approach through FLAG community led development is more appropriate to encouraging community buy in and development of projects that are integrated across sectors. The FLAG infrastructure allows projects that might struggle to gain traction in competition for funding at a national level to develop in proportion to their local potential and significance. Thus allowing a “launching pad” where some projects may evolve and be enabled to scale up and apply to mainstream funding, ensuring that small innovative ideas are given the opportunity to emerge and develop. The work of the FLAGs has produced 6 regional strategies which identify potential job development opportunities including social and economic benefits for our coastal regions. The potential can be realised with appropriate funding and support from the Seafood development Programme 2 0 1 4 -2 0 2 0 . It is important that Community led local development has a secure position in the Seafood
development Programme 2 0 1 4 -2 0 2 0 to ensure that coastal areas can develop their true potential while competing for funding at an appropriate scale. With this in mind the scale of funding (EU plus National) to the FLAGs should be scaled up substantially. In effect Ireland should aim at a minimum to increase to a level, that is equal to if not greater than that of the European average. That is the proportion of funding to FLAGs with the next O perational Programme needs to be increased. The funding available under the current programme was at a level to assist in creating awareness of the potential of local regional decision making. The expectation within the coastal communities is that this will increase in the next programme to allow more substantial projects to take place. 5 . Do you have any views on specific needs concerning the environment, climate change mitigation and adaptation and innovation? At a FLAG level our unique natural environment and resources need to be protected and developed. As part of this producers need to be engaged to contribute proactively. FLAGs could be instrumental in nurturing and promoting this activity by seafood producers while still engaging in productive harvest sensitive to the environment. Rewarding producers for adaptive and innovative practices in relation to their local environment could be developed through FLAG supported projects. 9 . What can be done in the next programme period to increase employment and contribute to economic recovery? Support for programmes that maximise the potential of the available raw material, developing synergies in a small coastal fisheries and aquaculture. Priming the small coastal producers to contribute to scale for national production processing and export through support for development and innovation as part of the Seafood Development Program 2 0 1 4 -2 0 2 0 . Creation of job opportunities in adding value and Marine tourism as part of an integrated coastal development approach through community led development. 1 0 . What can be done in the next programme period to assist the seafood sector in achieving its potential?
The next Seafood Development programme can assist the seafood sector in achieving it’s potential by giving support and recognition for the FLAG strategies produced with our coastal communities. These strategies have identified challenges and opportunities for coastal communities in the seafood industry, ancillary services, maritime tourism heritage and leisure. Continuing and reviewing the process for FLAGS is critical in directing the appropriate support towards coastal communities to optimise the potential of the raw materials and natural assets available to them.
You can also read