Community Safety A Plan for Violence Prevention, Response, and Recovery - February 2022
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Contents Introduction 3 I. Preventing Violence 5 Invest in Violence Interruption 5 Combat the Circumstances that Lead to Violence 7 Get Guns Off the Street 7 Expand Mental Health Services 8 Prevent Young People From Becoming Involved with Crime 9 Respond to Drug Use as a Public Health Emergency 10 II. Responding to Crime 12 Decenter Police from Crisis and Traffic Responses 12 Reform Police Culture to Foster Positive Relationships Between Communities and Police 13 Increase Transparency, Accountability, and Oversight Over Police 15 Eliminate Ineffectual and Dangerous Police Tactics 16 Expand Diversion and Restorative Justice Programs 17 Abolish Mandatory Minimums 18 Treat Children as Children 19 Address Inhumane Conditions of Incarceration 19 III. Recovering From Crime 21 Expand Rights and Resources for Survivors 21 Ensure Effective Re-entry for Returning Citizens 22 Conclusion 25 2
Introduction Having grown up in DC in the 1990s, I know what it means to not feel safe in our city. Many of us worry that we are moving back to the time when our great city was known as the “murder capital.” DC had 226 homicides in 2021, the most in 18 years. 1 The number of homicides has increased every year for the last four years, and violence like this is a sign that DC communities are hurting in ways that require healing. This violence is happening despite the fact that DC has one of the largest per capita police budgets of any city in the nation. 2 If police spending alone stopped violence, DC would be one of the safest cities in the world. But we’re not. It’s clear our current approach to criminal justice and public safety is not turning the tide on violent crime, and we cannot continue to put more and more taxpayer money into the same systems, hoping for different outcomes. Ensuring our city is safe will take a holistic approach from all of DC government as well as our community partners. In my years on DC Council I’ve heard from experts on this issue, including public safety officials, police officers, members of the Police Reform Commission, the ACLU of DC, and more. Based on their expertise, as well as what I hear from DC residents every day, I have developed a plan to (1) prevent crime (2) respond to crime and (3) help communities to recover from decades of violence. That means we will interrupt the patterns and circumstances that lead to crime, ensure our responses to violence are trauma-informed, do not create further harm, and hold those who commit violent acts accountable, and help individuals and 1 Metropolitan Police Department. “District Crime Data at a Glance.” Accessed January 5, 2021. Available at https://mpdc.dc.gov/page/district-crime-data-glance. 2 Learish, J. “Defund the police? Police budgets of major U.S. cities.” (2021, September 30). CBS News. Available at https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/defund-the-police-police-budgets-of-major-us-cities/7/
INTRODUCTION communities recover from the trauma of violence and help returning citizens reenter communities. The best crime response is one that prevents crime from occuring in the first place. Our city has not yet fully committed to proven violence interventions and has allowed conditions that enable violence to fester. Half measures have shown themselves to be insufficient. We need to make real investments in violence interruption and strengthening communities, commit to real reforms in our public safety agencies, and address the trauma that violence has left on our city. As mayor, I will ensure real investment in proven, data-driven solutions. Together, we can make DC a safer place for everyone. The following is my vision for a safer city. 4
I. Preventing Violence Simply being tough on crime will not make our communities safer, as we have seen all too well in the last few decades. We can’t scare people out of committing crimes with threats of police action or incarceration. People who have safe housing, good jobs, and mental health support do not generally commit violent crimes. We need to invest in violence interruption and providing people with the support they need to not resort to crime, and other proactive measures such as getting guns off the street, preventing young people from getting involved with crime, and public health responses to drug use. Invest in Violence Interruption Violence interruption needs to become a core component of the District’s public safety strategy. We must send a clear message that violence will not be tolerated, but we do not need to be punitive to do so. Systemic injustices have led to a situation where the majority of violence in DC is committed by a small number of people, most living in extremely difficult circumstances. The people most likely to be perpetrators of violence are often struggling under the weight of poverty and complex intergenerational trauma, and are also those most likely to be the victims of violence themselves. DC should focus on providing these people with resources and opportunities that will deter them from violence using a relationship-based, violence interrupter approach. These efforts must include holistic wraparound services including job training, educational assistance, substance use care, housing, and mentoring.
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE Often, police and others working on behalf of the government are unable to build productive relationships with those engaged in violence due to years of mistrust and a lack of credibility within the community. Violence interrupters who come from and are part of the communities they serve are best positioned to create trust and provide the resources people need to stop committing violence. In 2021 alone, Cure the Streets, the pilot violence interruption program from the DC Office of the Attorney General, conducted approximately 82 mediations across the District and helped prevent the escalation of violence. 3 DC’s program is still only a pilot, but programs like it in other major cities have shown substantial promise. 4 We must increase our violence interruption efforts to meet the scale of the problem. We cannot continue to rely on pilot programs and half-funding: we need robust dedication and investment to violence interruption. The proposals in the Neighborhood Engagement Achieves Results (NEAR) Act are a strong start. I will implement these not in half-measures, but with deep commitment. DC should commit to professionalizing community-based violence interruption work and providing long-term funding to maintain these services. Violence interrupters should receive adequate pay, benefits and training. Metropolitan Police Department (MPD) officers receive competitive compensation and have an in-depth training academy, but no equivalent benefits and training exist for violence interrupters. If we value the work violence interrupters do, DC needs to professionalize the positions more. DC also has incredible community organizations that work tirelessly to end violence and crime. We should do a better job ensuring these organizations are able to access grants so they can expand their capacity. In addition, we can provide training to build their accounting, data tracking, and other business capacity. DC government should provide common training and goals. 3 Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. (n.d.) “Cure the Streets: OAG’s Violence Interruption Program.” Accessed January 10, 2022. Available: https://oag.dc.gov/public-safety/cure-streets-oags-violence-interruption-program 4 Urban Peace Institute. (n.d.) “Our History.” Accessed January 10, 2022. Available at https://www.urbanpeaceinstitute.org/history. 6
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE Combat the Circumstances that Lead to Violence Deliberately racist and classist policy decisions, along with a history of discrimination in housing, education, economic opportunities, and transportation have deprived communities to the point where many feel like crime is their only option. While in the short term we need to provide violence interruption services to those at most risk of being a perpetrator or victim of violence, in the long term we must also invest in combating circumstances such as poverty, housing instability, unemployment, inadequate mental health care, and substance abuse, all of which contribute to crime. We need to improve our education and affordable housing systems. We also need to invest in job training and vocational programs to offer people hope and opportunities for self-determination outside of crime. Finally, we must expand emergency shelter and support services.5 Get Guns Off the Street Gun violence costs DC $1.1 billion every year, and the cost to families and communities in lives lost is one that can’t be measured.6 We have placed too much emphasis on aggressive police tactics that rarely recover guns, and on punitive consequences for gun offenses and we have not seen the results we need. If we want to reduce the number of guns in our communities, we need to address the conditions that cause someone to use or feel the need to carry a gun. There are clear, evidence-based ways to take action on this, including violence interruption programs that work individually with the people most at-risk of violence to provide them with the safety and security that they are using a gun to create. 5 Decentering Police to Improve Public Safety: A Report of the DC Police Reform Commission.” (2021, April 1). p. 34. Available at https://dccouncil.us/police-reform-commission-full-report/. 6 Learn more about the Urban Peace Institute Project here: https://www.urbanpeaceinstitute.org/. 7
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE Almost all of the illegal guns in DC come from neighboring states. 7 The District should target illegal gun traffickers and work with our regional partners to stop the flow of dangerous weapons into the District. We need more thorough tracking of guns and ammunition used in crimes to determine their origin and prevent trafficking from those sources in the future. We can work with Maryland and Virginia to create interstate compacts and demand greater consequences for gun manufacturers that allow guns to flow into our city. Expand Mental Health Services We need to address the deep trauma caused by the violence so many residents are seeing every day. The trauma of violence carries dangerous long-term impacts that we have left untreated and increases the likelihood people will become either a perpetrator or victim of violence in the future. Addressing and treating this trauma will be a necessary part of interrupting that cycle, especially in communities that also deal with the trauma of systemic racism and economic discrimination. DC must provide more mental health services and do so in culturally competent, accessible ways. One way DC can expand mental health services is by investing in community-based organizations already providing low-cost or free therapy. We must particularly invest in organizations designed to help children work through and develop appropriate coping mechanisms for difficult emotions such as disappointment and grief. It’s difficult to recognize the symptoms of trauma, especially for a person still experiencing it. To address this, DC can require physicians to conduct a depression/mental health screening survey at every visit, including providers like 7 Dvorak, P. (2019, October 7). “D.C. is awash in illegal guns. How do you think they get there?” The Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/dc-is-awash-in-illegal-guns-how-do-you-think-they-get-there/2019/10/07/014 93180-e934-11e9-85c0-85a098e47b37_story.html. 8
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE dentists and optometrists who don’t normally do so. The survey is usually simple but can help catch issues early and provide help through therapy referral. In addition, therapy remains stigmatized in many communities. DC needs a government-wide mental health and trauma-awareness public education campaign to reduce stigma and encourage people to seek help. Prevent Young People From Becoming Involved with Crime During the summer of 2021 we saw a series of high profile crimes committed by young people.8 From car-jackings to robberies, it is clear our youth are desperate for support and many are crying out for help. DC has not sufficiently allocated resources towards trauma-informed care for young people, and we have failed to provide many young people with opportunities for success. Improving education for all students, particularly students of color and students with special needs, will dramatically reduce violence. We also need to ensure young people are taken care of when they are not in the school building. Youth crime involvement is often a matter of not having something to do after school or on weekends if parents are not home. Young people tell us all the time that they don’t have enough activities outside of school. It’s time we listen. DC needs to increase after-school and summer programming, youth sports, and volunteer opportunities to make sure that students have a place to go when school is not in session. In addition, DC needs to expand the number of recreation centers staffed with child development experts and trusted adults to give kids a safe space and a place to go when not in school, especially east of the Anacostia river. 8 King, C. (2021, July 16). “Opinion: Juvenile crime makes one thing clear: We are failing our children.” The Washington Post. Available at https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/07/16/juvenile-crime-makes-one-thing-clear-we-are-failing-our-childr en/. 9
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE DC also needs to expand access to employment and vocational training for young people so that kids can make money in legal and safe ways and see a future for themselves outside of crime. We don’t have enough vocational opportunities for students. We need to expand these programs so that kids who need these programs most have access. In addition, children who have a relationship with a trusted mentor are less likely to engage in dangerous behavior.9 District-sponsored and community-based programs for mentorship and one-on-one attention give young people more adults in their lives to be accountable to and more adults who can support their successes and progress. We need to find and train committed mentors who can build relationships with and support young people. Respond to Drug Use as a Public Health Emergency DC needs to reimagine our response to drug use. That starts with decriminalizing drug possession so that people who use drugs are not discouraged from seeking help. We should respond to addiction like any other illness: with treatment, not punishment. Incarcerating people for addiction costs substantially more than treatment while also separating and traumatizing families, and doing nothing to solve the underlying problem. Between 2015 and 2018, an estimated 16,000 to 24,000 adults in the District who needed treatment for illicit drug use did not receive it.10 Law enforcement’s primary responsibility when dealing with cases of drug misuse should be to get the person counseling, Medication Assisted Treatment, or other help. 9 DuBois, D. (2021, May 26). “Mentoring Programs for Youth: A Promising Intervention for Delinquency Prevention.” National Institute of Justice. Available at https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/mentoring-programs-youth-promising-intervention-delinquency-prevention. 10 “Decentering Police to Improve Public Safety: A Report of the DC Police Reform Commission.” (2021, April 1). p. 58. Available at https://dccouncil.us/police-reform-commission-full-report/. 10
I. PREVENTING VIOLENCE DC can follow the lead of other jurisdictions and establish safe injection sites (also known as overdose prevention sites). Instead of stigmatizing people who use drugs, these sites provide a safe place to receive sterile needles, connect with treatment options, and receive overdose prevention if necessary. These sites should also have testing capabilities to determine if substances contain fentanyl, which is responsible for a significant share of overdoses in DC. 11 DC also needs to continue to expand our program providing Narcan (also known as Naloxone) and training to shelters to help respond to overdoses quickly and save lives. To help prevent addiction DC needs to invest in public education about the dangers of synthetic drugs like fentanyl, as well as options for treatment and recovery. We must work with public health agencies and community partners to bring these resources to all our communities. 11 Grablick, C. (2021, December 7). “D.C. Area Set To Record Another Deadly Year For Opioid Overdoses.” WAMU. Available at https://wamu.org/story/21/12/07/listen-opioid-overdose-fatalities-surge-dc-region-2021/. 11
II. Responding to Crime What stops people from committing crimes is knowing that they will be caught - not knowing how harshly they might be punished. Right now, our priorities do not reflect this reality. We have put too much focus on harsh punishments and not enough focus on ensuring crimes are solved. Fewer than half of the serious crimes in DC get solved in a given year, including fewer than 40% of homicides. 12 Holding perpetrators accountable is an important part of deterring future crime. This means not just investing in police and ensuring they are equipped to do their jobs, but also recognizing that police are only one part of a comprehensive public safety apparatus. Decenter Police from Crisis and Traffic Responses Police are not equipped to handle every emergency and should not be expected to do so. We need to make behavioral healthcare professionals the default response to community members in crisis, just as many other jurisdictions across the country have done.13 We need to expand DC’s existing pilot program for this and make it a legitimate alternative to the police. We need a robust agency that is staffed 24/7 with mental health experts, social workers, and domestic violence advocates who can more appropriately respond to 100% of these calls. This agency should additionally be responsible for wellness checks which traditionally would have been assigned to police officers.14 12 Sprouse, R. (2021, November 2). “DC has more than 100 open homicide cases this year.” WUSA-9. Available at https://www.wusa9.com/article/news/crime/open-homicide-cases-dc-numbers-up-solve-rate-decreasing/65-976518f 8-d6e5-46ac-9da4-ecfad719f95a. 13 Ibid., p 15. 14 Ibid., p 16.
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME In instances of mental health crises or other behavioral healthcare emergencies where there is a concern of violence or a weapon present, we need to implement a co-response between behavioral health professionals and MPD officers who specifically train and prepare for these situations. Working together, police and trained healthcare professionals can more safely and effectively diffuse situations and resolve them with the least amount of violence and harm. In addition, there is no need for armed police officers to handle many aspects of routine traffic enforcement. Any aspect of traffic and vehicle enforcement which does not imminently threaten public safety should be handled by the DC Department of Transportation. This will alleviate responsibilities we have placed on police and allow them to focus on public safety while also preventing these situations from escalating to violence as we have seen time after time. Something like a broken tail light or parking violation does not need to be handled by police. However, drunk driving or other direct threats to public safety should still fall under the jurisdiction of MPD. We should prohibit police from making traffic stops that are not responding to an immediate threat to public safety. Reform Police Culture to Foster Positive Relationships Between Communities and Police A trustworthy police department is crucial for a safe city. When people do not trust the police, they do not work with officers to solve crimes and may turn to violence to address conflict and protect themselves from further victimization. Reconciliation between communities and police must be initiated by the police, or it won’t happen. Government leaders and police need to take accountability for past harm and commit to listening to communities to determine how they can do better. The culture change begins with how we train officers. The Metropolitan Police Academy must teach officers the values we want them to hold, including critical 13
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME thinking, empathy, understanding, cultural competency, and anti-racism. De-escalation and creative problem solving should be core components of police training. Training on use-of-force standards should make it clear that any force used must be necessary, reasonable, and proportional. Finally, officers should be trained on adolescent development and adolescent-appropriate policing as children are uniquely susceptible to intimidation and pressure and may give false statements when in stressful situations. Training also shouldn’t stop once officers graduate from the academy. Annual refresher courses on topics such as bias, de-escalation, use-of-force, and other skills should be both robust and mandatory for all officers. Officers should be held accountable for failing to use these approaches during encounters. Additional training on leadership and accountability should be given to officers seeking career advancement. We also need to foster a culture of active bystandership among officers. MPD officers should be incentivized to hold each other accountable and report malfeasance by their peers. Officers should be duty-bound to intervene when they see a peer engaging in excessive force or otherwise failing to appropriately police. DC leaders need to impose consequences for officers who misuse power as well as officers who fail to intervene or are complicit in misconduct. These need to be clear in both legal standards and MPD General Orders. Our police officers need to be better integrated into our communities to encourage trust and communication between the public and officers. One way we can do this is to encourage officers to spend more time on foot in well-trafficked areas. By getting out of their squad cars, police officers will feel more approachable and less intimidating and will have more opportunities for positive interactions with the people they are serving. We also cannot use punitive measures like tickets and 14
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME arrests as metrics for promotions and bonuses as it incentivizes confrontational interactions where they may not otherwise occur. . We can use the model of restorative justice to bring communities and police together to discuss harms that have been committed and collectively find solutions to collaborate peacefully and productively in the future. These discussions will humanize both sides and allow for greater understanding of the other’s perspective on both the side of the police and the community. Finally, in order to create a healthy and safe environment for both officers and the public, we need to address the significant stressors and trauma police officers face. Many police officers have witnessed horrific events, and this is especially true after the January 6, 2021 insurrection. Studies show that police officers are “at elevated risk of anxiety, depression, PTSD, high blood pressure, substance abuse, suicidal thinking, and other serious health issues.”15 We must address the trauma that officers carry and provide them with mental health support. We need to reduce the stigma surrounding mental health services and ensure that these services are accessible to all officers. We need to have more on-staff, dedicated psychologists trained in dealing with police trauma and who have the cultural competency necessary to connect with officers. These resources should be accessible and should be encouraged by police leadership. Increase Transparency, Accountability, and Oversight Over Police Transparency is a core aspect of policing in a democratic society, but MPD does not currently have a culture of transparency. 16 DC residents deserve regular and thorough collection, maintenance, analysis, and publication of data.17 This includes 15 “Decentering Police to Improve Public Safety: A Report of the DC Police Reform Commission.” (2021, April 1). p. 24. Available at https://dccouncil.us/police-reform-commission-full-report/. 16 Ibid., p. 13. 17 Ibid., p. 20. 15
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME data on stops, searches, arrests, and uses of force.18 MPD should use this data to address weaknesses and flaws in the department. DC leaders should also use this data as an accountability mechanism for MPD’s goals and performance. Officers who have committed crimes on or off duty cannot be on the force without compromising the integrity of the entire unit. MPD must stop purging records from officers' personnel files. 19 We cannot continue to turn a blind eye to allegations of violence, especially domestic violence, against officers. Harassment within the department, including sexual assault, cannot be tolerated. Eliminate Ineffectual and Dangerous Police Tactics Police approaches to public safety need to limit violence, not contribute to it. MPD should ban the use of no-knock warrants and jump-outs (when officers jump out of unmarked cars to surround, stop, and search individuals without basis), and limit quick-knock raids. All of these tactics often escalate situations. 20 Police methods such as sexually invasive searches, racial profiling, and all forms of stop and frisks must be stopped. DC should also eliminate consent searches, which are “warrantless searches permitted based solely on the consent of the individual whose person or property is searched.” True consent cannot be given in the context of a police interaction.21 While DC has made progress in banning some aggressive restraint tactics, there is more to be done. MPD should ban all restraint tactics that can lead to asphyxiation or serious injury. These tactics are unnecessary and can be replaced by less dangerous alternatives. Specialized units that use aggressive tactics, such as MPD’s 18 Ibid. 19 Ibid., p 26. 20 ACLU of the District of Columbia. (2020, October 15). “Statement on behalf of the American Civil Liberties Union of the District of Columbia before the DC Council Committee on the Judiciary and Public Safety Hearing on Bill 23-882, the “Comprehensive Policing and Justice Reform Amendment Act of 2020,” by Monica Hopkins.” Available at https://www.acludc.org/en/legislation/aclu-dc-testifies-dc-council-committee-comprehensive-police-and-justice-refor m-amendment. 21 Ibid., p 20. 16
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME Crime Suppression Teams and Gun Recovery Unit, should be suspended until MPD can prove they are more effective than regular patrol units. 22 In DC we have thousands of special police officers (SPOs) who “patrol specific properties, such as public housing complexes and government buildings.”23 These officers do not receive the requisite training to carry firearms and are not sworn police officers, yet are often armed. DC should prohibit SPOs from carrying guns,24 and should also prohibit SPOs from “pursuing subjects beyond their jurisdictional boundaries.”25 Finally, DC should permanently restrict the use of violent responses to protest. The violence we saw aimed at protesters in the summer of 2020 was unacceptable and must never be repeated. We need to severely limit the use of chemical weapons, non-lethal projectiles such as rubber bullets, and riot gear. 26 Expand Diversion and Restorative Justice Programs Where appropriate, DC should create more alternatives to incarceration for those instances where both the individual and the community would be better served by referral to mental health treatment, substance abuse treatment, or other rehabilitative services. These diversions should be codified, not left up to prosecutors to decide when they should be used. DC’s Alternatives to the Court Experience (ACE) Diversion program has had great success doing this in the juvenile justice system and we can bring the same success to the criminal justice space. 27 22 Ibid., p 21. 23 Manning, F., Mugler, J., Sulton, P. (2020, July). “More Than a Plaza: Disarm Special Police.” DC Justice Lab. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5edff6436067991288014c4c/t/5f15e7b04b00363cf15870a1/1595271088909/Disar m+Special+Police.pdf. 24 Ibid. 25 “Decentering Police to Improve Public Safety: A Report of the DC Police Reform Commission.” (2021, April 1). p. 124. Available at https://dccouncil.us/police-reform-commission-full-report/. 26 Ibid., p 211. 27 DC Department of Human Services. (n.d.) “Alternatives to the Court Experience (ACE) Diversion Program.” Accessed January 10, 2022. Available at https://dhs.dc.gov/page/alternatives-court-experience-ace-diversion-program. 17
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME One alternative to incarceration is restorative justice, a practice in which survivors and perpetrators of crime come together to discuss the harm committed and where victims are centered in determining what needs to occur to remedy the harm. The DC Office of the Attorney General has had great success implementing restorative justice practices with young people. DC should increase investment in these programs and expand them to other appropriate arenas. The trauma that communities experience when their loved ones are incarcerated cannot be overstated.28 We can reduce this trauma not just by investing in crime prevention, but by expanding alternatives to incarceration and not relying on excessively long sentences. Our goals in seeking accountability should not exclusively be punishment, but making communities safer by reducing the chances of recidivism. Abolish Mandatory Minimums DC needs to abolish all mandatory minimum sentences in the DC Code. Mandatory minimums prevent judges from considering the full circumstances of a case and delivering sentences that are appropriate to the needs of both the community and the individual. Mandatory minimums have had a severely disproportionate impact on communities of color, and are incompatible with a system that seeks to achieve racial justice.29 People don’t make a rational cost-benefit analysis before committing crimes, so mandatory minimums do little to deter crime but significantly interfere with judges’ ability to exercise discretion. 28 Martin, E. (2017, March 1). “Hidden Consequences: The Impact of Incarceration on Dependent Children.” National Institute of Justice. Available at https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/hidden-consequences-impact-incarceration-dependent-children. 29 Brennan, J., Meyer, M., Scholar, B. (2021, January). “Repeal Mandatory Minimums.” DC Justice Lab. Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5edff6436067991288014c4c/t/601715b1205307710b8d67e4/1612125617249/Repe al+All+Mandatory+Minimum+Statutes.pdf. 18
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME Treat Children as Children DC needs to follow the lead of DC Attorney General Karl Racine and continue to reform our juvenile justice system to better serve the unique circumstances of young people who commit crimes. Children and adolescents' brains are still developing, and young people have incredible potential to be rehabilitated and rejoin the community as productive members. We all do better off when they do. Currently, the US Attorney’s office can unilaterally decide to charge some children as adults, without a judge’s independent assessment of whether this is appropriate or necessary. In practice, children of color are much more likely to be treated as if they are adults.30 We must follow scientific evidence and keep most children under the age of 21 in the juvenile system that can better meet their needs. 31 Children under the age of 18 should not be charged as if they are adults and people between the ages of 18 and 21 should only be charged as adults after an individualized assessment of the facts of the case. DC should also expand our investment in diversion and restorative justice programs specifically aimed at children. Address Inhumane Conditions of Incarceration The conditions in the DC Jail are inhumane and unacceptable. For years, we have heard reports of food denial and highly unsanitary living conditions. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the DC Jail failed to provide adequate medical care and stop the spread of the virus, leading the ACLU of DC to sue the DC Department of Corrections (DOC).32 I saw these conditions first-hand when visiting my brother in the early 2000s. It was not until the January 6th insurrectionists housed in DC Jail complained about these conditions that we saw federal intervention and 30 Fenston, J. (2021, June 30). “New Bill Aims To Keep D.C. Teens Out Of Adult Justice System.” DCist. Available at https://dcist.com/story/21/06/30/new-bill-aims-to-keep-dc-teens-out-of-adult-justice-system/. 31 Office of the Attorney General for the District of Columbia. (2021, June 30). “AG Racine Introduces Legislation to Reform the District's Juvenile Justice System.” Available at https://oag.dc.gov/release/ag-racine-introduces-legislation-reform-districts. 32 ACLU of the District of Columbia. (2021, November 3). “ACLU-DC Statement on Inhumane Conditions Inside D.C. Jail.” Available at https://www.acludc.org/en/press-releases/aclu-dc-statement-inhumane-conditions-inside-dc-jail. 19
II. RESPONDING TO CRIME widespread outrage. We need to treat the predominantly Black and Brown DC residents incarcerated in DC Jail, who have been ignored for far too long, with basic human dignity and respect. The unacceptable treatment of people in DC Jail increases trauma and leads to difficulties reintegrating into the community, which in turn can lead to recidivism. While DOC has made progress in expanding the programming DC Jail offers, leadership has neglected basic day-to-day operations and tolerated a culture of abuse. DOC must provide safe, humane, and dignified treatment of the people in its care. DC Jail should also not be the only option for pre-trial detention. Judges need an option for when neither incarceration nor return home are appropriate pre-trial options. The District needs to establish halfway houses for people to live pre-trial to allow people to maintain the relationships and employment pending trial. DC also does not currently have a local prison, which means Washingtonians who are convicted of felony crimes are transferred to the Federal Bureau of Prisons hundreds or thousands of miles away. These distant locations make visitation nearly impossible and, as Robert Barton, co-founder of More Than Our Crimes, put it, “severs ties with your whole community.” 33 This is deeply traumatic for both the incarcerated person as well as their family and support systems. It also undermines public safety by fraying the relationships necessary for successful reentry and making people more likely to recidivate. Placing people in the federal system for DC crimes also means that District leaders have no control over the conditions in which people are confined, and no way to address systemic abuses. DC needs to create a local prison that works to rehabilitate people who are incarcerated and which allows people to maintain relationships with their support networks. This will result in better rehabilitation and transitions to productive lives after incarceration. 33 More Than Our Crimes. (n.d.) “The Case for a D.C. Prison.” Available at https://morethanourcrimes.org/the-case-for-a-dc-prison/. 20
III. Recovering From Crime When crime does occur, it is crucial that we respond holistically to treat the needs of those victimized. In too many situations, victims have very little government support or are not made aware of the support they are entitled to. We must center the needs of victims and help them recover from harm. We also must ensure that our criminal justice system creates opportunities for healing and redemption, and that it prepares people for reentry into our communities and supports them when they do so. This will reduce recidivism and allow returning citizens to become contributing members of our community. Expand Rights and Resources for Survivors DC needs to increase the services and attention we pay to the survivors of crimes and ensure that their needs and perspectives are prioritized in our criminal justice system. Not only is this our moral duty, but since “hurt people hurt people,” allowing crime survivors the opportunities and resources necessary to heal will interrupt the cycles of violence that too often repeat themselves in our city. DC should increase investments in the Office of Victim Services, which provides resources to help people recover from crime. Domestic violence survivors in particular need robust wrap-around services in order to recover from trauma. Wait lists for DC-run therapy services are impossibly long. DC should help community organizations build capacity to provide these crucial services in a culturally competent and accessible manner.
III. RECOVERING FROM CRIME As previously discussed, our emergency response system can not solely consist of police. DC needs trained mental health counselors and first responders who are able to address the immediate needs of survivors in the aftermath of violence. First responders’ engagement with survivors should be compassionate and aware of cultural differences that may determine how a person views a situation. All first responders and city responders should be trained in cultural sensitivity and competence. Ensure Effective Re-entry for Returning Citizens One of my priorities in office has been to increase the services we provide to returning citizens. The District is home to more than 60,000 formerly incarcerated people, and if we want to improve public safety and see returning citizens establish a stable life for themselves and their families, we need to improve the level of services provided.34 This is personal to me as I saw my own brother struggle with the reentry process, despite having relative privilege in terms of stable family relationships and strong support system. I am incredibly proud of the progress DC has made and I look forward to continuing this crucial work. We must begin the process of engaging with incarcerated residents long before they come home and take proactive steps to ensure people are able to smoothly transition home. This will include making sure that incarcerated residents have access to effective vocational and life skills programs. It also will involve working with federal and local agencies to help returning citizens acquire government identification, benefits, and other government support as soon as they return to the community. 34 Robinson, C. (2021, March 18). “The D.C. Reentry Navigator: Empowering You To Succeed With A D.C. Criminal Record.” The Public Defender Service of the District of Columbia. Available at https://www.pdsdc.org/docs/default-source/d.c.-reentry-navigator/the-d-c-reentry-navigator-empowering-you-to-succ eed-with-a-d-c-criminal-record_1.pdf. 22
III. RECOVERING FROM CRIME Once people are released, DC should increase the efficacy and funding of job training programs and incentivize employers to hire returning citizens. In 2020, I restored the Paralegal Fellowship Initiative to get returning citizens trained and employed as paralegals. We need more programs like this one and greater collaboration with the Department of Employment Services and local employers. We need to expand public outreach and education on the District’s Ban the Box legislation, and establish automatic expungement of decriminalized offenses and non-convictions to expedite the time in which records are eligible for expungement.35 DC also needs to establish returning citizen liaison positions in District agencies and improve our case management system which connects returning citizens to available resources and services. These services need to include robust mental health support to counter the trauma that comes from incarceration and gun violence. To the extent possible, these programs should be run by returning citizens themselves. After hearing from returning citizens that a lack of government identification and transportation were barriers to their success, I pioneered programs to ensure returning citizens get government identification and a transportation subsidy when they return home. When we center the voices of returning citizens, we learn where people get stuck and how to fix those issues. Housing is crucial to successful reentry. Halfway houses help returning citizens reintegrate into communities and move towards stable lives, but since the closure of Hope Village, the District does not have a halfway house for men. 36 As we design our system of reentry, we should ensure there are multiple halfway houses throughout the District. Instead of having one large halfway house, several smaller ones throughout the District will help people stay close to their families and communities, 35 DC Justice Lab. “The Record Expungement Simplification To Offer Relief and Equity (RESTORE) Act of 2021.” Available at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/5edff6436067991288014c4c/t/60671423d14ac278e98ad6f4/1617368099158/RES TORE+Act+One+Pager.pdf. 36 Lerner, K. (2020, April 23). “Closure Of D.C.’S Only Men’s Halfway House Leaves Residents Scrambling For A Safe Place To Live.” The Appeal. Available at https://theappeal.org/hope-village-washington-dc-only-halfway-house-closure/. 23
III. RECOVERING FROM CRIME and increase individualized attention for residents who need intense assistance as they navigate their first days home and start working through their plans for success. We also need more than just halfway housing. Returning citizens are coming home to an affordable housing crisis. This instability, if not addressed, can lead to recidivism. We need to create or set aside housing that is practical and sustainable for residents returning home.37 Finally, I am incredibly proud to have sponsored first in the nation legislation to return voting rights to all incarcerated Washingtonians. This is an issue of civil rights and democracy, and also helps returning citizens retain their role as members of the community who have a say in District policy even while incarcerated. Our next step must be increasing awareness of this legislative change among incarcerated residents. 37 Justice Policy Institute. (2021, July). “Voices for Reform in DC: Recommendations for improving reentry following long prison terms.” Justice Policy Institute. Available at https://justicepolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/Voices-for-Reform-in-DC-2021.pdf. 24
Conclusion No community can thrive when violence is taking place. DC’s leaders need to do more to prevent violence from happening, respond to violence in culturally aware and trauma-informed ways, and help communities and individuals recover from violence and incarceration. There are simple and straightforward ways we can do this, but right now DC’s leaders are relying on strategies that are clearly not working. Four years of consecutive increases in homicides and now an 18-year record for homicides is not the direction DC should be headed. The strategies included here are a map for what DC can and should do differently to build community safety from the grassroots up. I welcome your questions, conversation, and partnership in this effort that is so important for all of us. Sincerely, Robert White Candidate for DC Mayor 25
You can also read