CLM-Communtiy Assembly 2019 Paestum, Italy - hzg wiki
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
CLM-Communtiy Assembly 2019 Paestum, Italy Minutes by Susanne Brienen, 2/10/2019 Community meeting 18 September 2019 Coordination Change Barbara Früh (DWD) handed over the coordination of the community to Christian Steger (DWD) who was elected as coordinator by the SAB.
Status of the Science plan Christian presented the current status of the science plan. There were no questions. ICON-CLM ● Christian presented the concept for source code management. A detailed document will be prepared. A source code administration (SCA) group is in progress to be formed. ● ICON license: there are currently two possibilities to get a license (institutional license or personal license). The coordination is currently in contact with MPI-M to get a personal license for all community members without further application. ● No questions.
Next meetings ● ICCARUS 2-6 March 2020 ● ICON-LAM/ICON-CLM training course 30 March – 3 April 2020 ● Presentation of Ingo Kirchner for a possible location of the Assembly 2020 at the Free University Berlin, Germany (in September / October) Vote (agreement / rejection): 29 / 0
Community meeting 20 September 2019 CLM Assembly 2021 ● Presentation by Oscar Brousse for possible location of the Assembly 2021 at KU Leuven (Belgium) ● Vote (agreement / rejection): 23 / 0 ● offer accepted WG reports WG SUPTECH (presented by Astrid Kerkweg)
WG DYNNUM (presented by Andreas Will) ● There was no meeting, as there are currently only three active people in this group from which only Andreas Will was present. The position of the deputy is vacant, applications are welcome. ● Question Klaus: Will the implementation of the high order scheme be available in COSMO6.0 for COPAT2? For this, it is needed at the end of the year. Andreas: Hopefully; it is now the highest priority.
WG SOILVEG (presented by Mario Raffa) WG CRCS (presented by Ronny Petrik) ● Position of deputy is vacant, applications are welcome.
WG EVAL + combined ICON/EVAL meeting (presented by Ivonne Anders) ● Positions of coordinator and deputy are vacant, applications are welcome. ● More volunteers are needed for participation in the coordinated evaluation of COSMO6.0 and ICON-CLM (COPAT2). ● Question: Is the COSMO tool „fieldextra“ part of WG EVAL? Answer: not yet. Information: it is designed for operational NWP purposes with many options. But possibly it is much work to set it up in a different way. Information: in the past, the CLM-Community decided against fieldextra, but this may be revised. possible task for next EVAL meeting ● Question: is it planned to use the FREVA tool of MiKliP? Answer: this will be investigated at HZG with a new colleague. Plan: combine FREVA and EvaSuite of HZG. FREVA is also used at DWD. ● Question: which tool is used at the training course? Answer: it has been ETOOL in earlier times; for 2020 no tool will be used, as we only have one day; it can be discussed again for the preparation of the course in 2021.
WG CP (presented by Hendrik Feldmann) ● People are invited to join the group on the investigation of the CORDEX CORE data. ● Addition: it is important that the simulation protocol for regional simulations with CMIP6 forcing is distributed by EURO-CORDEX as soon as possible; other it is not clear how the setup for the simulations should look like -> Silje will try to clarify this (also necessary for PRINCIPLES project) ● Addition: wish for better decision strategy of which GCM use to downscale ● Question: it would be good to think about the model version for CMIP6 downscaling. Can we start shortly with the evaluation runs? We need soon the protocol. Answer: there was a short discussion, but timing is still unclear. In PRINCIPLES: if downscaling CMIP6 will be done, then it will be with the same version as for CMIP5 and the same protocol. At the ETH, it is not decided yet. ● Question: Why are the CORDEX plans not clear yet? Answer: we know that the discussions have been started, but not sure if they had been finalized.
PG ICON + combined ICON/EVAL meeting (presented by Klaus Keuler) ● Volunteers for participation in the necessary developments of ICON-CLM before the start of COPAT2 are invited. ● Comment on the naming: We already have the COSMO-CLM + CCLM, ICON-CLM + ICLM. We should use only one official name. Should be discussed. Answer: it was already voted to use ICLM, but in practice it is difficult; needs to be discussed + voted. Before publication of the reference paper! Will be added to the task list.
You can also read