Chiral spin liquid phases in SU(N) quantum magnets - IPAM, 4/23/2021
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Topological phases of matter • Robustness of topological states Topological quantum computation (no error correction needed !) How to engineer topological phases ? How to detect them: ground-state degeneracy excitations entanglement properties Use topology !
Topological phases of matter • Robustness of topological states Topological quantum computation (no error correction needed !) • Quasiparticles are anyons (fractional statistics) i.e. not necessarily bosons or fermions (spin statistics theorem breaks down in 2+1D) • Excitations can be abelian or not topological quantum field theory (e.g. Chern-Simons), braid group, fusion rules…
Chiral topological spin liquids Chiral topological phase is found in the fractional quantum Hall (FQH) effect topological phases, exotic excitations (abelian or not) unconventional superconductor when doped Is it possible to reach the same physics without Landau levels, on a lattice ? See e.g. talk by Cécile Repellin Mimic an effective magnetic field, Look for lattice models with similar flat bands etc. wavefunctions Fractional Chern insulators
OUTLINE Introduction: chiral spin liquids in a nutshell Combined numerical methods of a family of SU(N) models Conclusions and outlook Collaborators/Refs: • Ji-Yao Chen, L. Vanderstraeten, S. Capponi, D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. B 98, 184409 (2018) • Ji-Yao Chen, S. Capponi, A. Wietek, M. Mambrini, N. Schuch, D. Poilblanc, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 017201 (2020) • Ji-Yao Chen, Jheng-Wei Li, Pierre Nataf, Sylvain Capponi, Matthieu Mambrini, Keisuke Totsuka, Hong- Hao Tu, Andreas Weichselbaum, Jan von Delft, Didier Poilblanc, in preparation
he 1980s it was which is separated by the insulating bulk in wise edge channels, whose direction was n April 18, 2021 rriers are con- between, and whenever quantization occurs determined by the spin orientation (either up tem (or sheet), in the transverse resistance, the longitudi- or down) of the occupying electrons, forced Hall (1879) Quantum Hall (1980) Chiral spin liquids (CSL) Spin Hall (2004) Quantum spin Hall (2007) Anomalous Hall (1881) Quantum anomalous Hall (2013) H = lattice analogue of FQH states M Low-energy physics described by 2+1 Chern-Simons theory Quantum Hall Quantum spin Hall Quantum anomalous Hall 1 Quantum Hall trio. Numbers in parentheses indicate the years of each discovery. H is the external magnetic field, and M is ⌫= the magnetization. For all three quantum Hall effects, electrons flow through the lossless edge channels, with the rest of the FQH state system insulating. When there is a net forward flow of electrons for Hall resistance measurement, (left) those extra electrons lattice spin S=1/2 model 2 occupy only the left edge channels in the quantum Hall system regardless of their spins, (center) opposite-spin electrons occupy opposite sides in the quantum spin Hall system, and (right) only spin-down electrons flow through the left edge in the quantum anomalous Hall system. The locking schemes between spin and flow direction, and the number of edge channels depend on the material details, and only the simplest cases are illustrated here. incompressible (gapped) in the bulk www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 340 12 APRIL 2013 same 153 Published by AAAS charged e/2 fractional excitation neutral s=1/2 fractional excitation robust gapless chiral edge states same SU(2)1 CFT triangular lattice: Kalmeyer-Laughlin, 1987
chiral spin liquids = lattice analogs of FQH states These states break time-reversal symmetry (T) and parity (P) Protected edge modes described by SU(2)1 CFT “Long range Xiao-Gang Wen entanglement” Tensor networks formalism well suited Dubail-Read 2015 No-go theorem for a gaussian PEPS to have a bulk gap
chiral Jχ interactions. Fo clear. I. INTRODUCTION Jχ ∼ #t 3 /U 2 where J1 (resp. Jχ ) is the nearest-neighborthe same chirality direc The emergence of In this spin quantum article, liquids inwe study Heisenberg frustrated the spin-1/2 1 -J (resp., scalarJchirality) 2 Heisenberg coupling. Another open question in frustrated magnetism of thetriangular lattice. This o Abelian CSL in spin-1/2 SU(2) models on frustrated lattices quantum magnetism is an exciting phenomenon in contem- porary condensed model exhibit fascinatingsymmetry on [1]. matter physics theThese (TRS) properties such as triangular long-rangebreaking lattice states of matter phase withlattice triangular diagram additional of is the nature oftime-reversal the ground-state chiral interaction Jχ using DMRGS = 1/2 the intermediate phase in the Heisenberg model with added toward the corners of a te breaks T entanglement [2,3] or anyonic braiding statistics of quasipar- next-nearest-neighbor couplings around J2 /J1 ≈ 1/8. Severalmodel with growing J2 a simulations. ticle excitations, relevant The for a potential model Hamiltonian implementation of is given authors [20,33,34] found aas spin disordered state. Recently order, J1 -J2 spin liquid ( topological quantum computation [4]. Only very recently have several numerical studies [35– 40] proposed that a topological PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96, such 075116 phases been(2017) ! in realistic local spin!spin found to be stabilized liquid state of some ! kind might be realized in this regime.liquid (CSL), and tetrahe S=1/2 on triangular lattice models [5– 19]. H = J1 S⃗i · ⃗ S j + Triangular lattice Heisenberg models are a paradigm of J 2 The⃗exact⃗nature of this phase yet we S · S advocate i j + the J presence χ of ◦ ( ⃗ S a i remains × O(4) ∗ ⃗ S unclear. ) quantum j · ⃗ S In this paper , critical k pointlines) are obtained by m frustrated magnetism. Although the ⟨i,jHeisenberg ⟩ model with [41– ⟨⟨i,j ⟩⟩ 44] separating the 120 △/▽ Néel order from a putative Z2spin correlation function eemingly only nearest-neighbor interaction is known to stabilize a spin liquid. The diverging correlation length at this quantum critical point and the neighboring first-order phase transitionboundary between the 12 netheless, regular 120◦ Néel order [20– 23], adding further interac- eatures in PHYSICAL REVIEW B 96 , 075116 (2017) tion terms may increase where J and frustration 1 andJinduce 2 denote magneticthe into NN the and the stripy collinear NNN magnetic interactions, ordered phase render the J2 disorder to the system. Experimentally, several materials unambiguous PHYSICAL identification REVIEW B 95, 035141 of the(2017) intermediate spin liquid tor shows Global phase 1 with triangular respectively. lattice geometry do notThe exhibit scalar any sign chiral of phaseinteraction challenging, however. Jχ has the same J1 diagram and quantum spin liquids in a spin- triangular antiferromagnet liquid and quantum criticality in extended S = 12 Heisenberg models with the J 2 magnetic orderingmagnitude down to lowestfor all Chiral[24– temperatures the spin27]. up (△) and down on the (▽) triangular triangles, II. lattice MODEL and the topological nature in t Shou-Shu Gong, W. Zhu, J.-X. Zhu, D. N. Sheng, and KunThese Yang include, for example, the organic Mott insulators like developed. A possible 1 2 2,3 4 5 e [65,66], National 1 J High Magnetic Field Laboratory, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA2 Cu κ-(BEDT-TTF) three 2 (CN)3 sites or EtMe3for [24,25] i,j,k Sb[Pd(dmit)Jχ follow 2 ]2 Wethe clockwise investigate * the order Heisenberg Alexander Wietek and Andreas M. Läuchli in model all with the nearest- and Austriauniformby increasing Jχ is ne [26,27] Mexicoand are USA thus candidates realizing spin liquid physics. ctor. The 2 Theoretical Division, T-4 and CNLS, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Center for Integrated Nanotechnologies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NewHistorically 3 87545, Mexico 87545,Kalmeyer triangles USA as shown and Laughlin [28] introduced in Fig. (Received the Institut 1(a). Physically, fürnext-nearest-neighbor Theoretische Physik, Universität the interactions Innsbruck, scalar with an A-6020 chiral additional Innsbruck, 10 June 2016; revised manuscript received 21 December 2016; published 24 January 2017) r shows a National HighDepartment 4 of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Northridge, California chiral 91330, USA interaction spin liquid (CSL) state on the J χ term triangular Wecan lattice. be This induced in the Hubbard model with investigate the J -J Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice with an additional scalar chirality term to the neighboring ph G 5 Magnetic Field Laboratory and Department of Physics, Florida State University, state Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA is closely related to the celebrated Laughlinand wave function 1 2 mplication (Received 8 May 2017; published 9 August 2017) (d) of the fractional quantum large Hallin U a magnetic field been a[76,77]. Starting from the Hubbard show that a chiral spin liquid is stabilized in a sizable region of the phase diagram. This topological phase is triplet gap in the eve t DMRG M R 0.5 Tetrahedral phase We study the spin-1/2 Heisenberg model on the triangular lattice with the nearest-neighbor shown to be J > the 0, ground model, the effect state of several extended a t/U (t E D and has situated recently in Heisenberg and discuss between U coplanar are 120 ◦ the Néel ordered hopping and a noncoplanar and 1 2 tetrahedrally ordered interaction, phase. the nature of the spin-disordered intermediate phase in the J -J model. We compare the ground states Furthermore we could be consistent w D 1 models next-nearest-neighobr J > 0 Heisenberg interactions, and the additional scalar chiral interaction J (S × S ) · S 2 on ⃗ the⃗ kagomé ⃗ lattice [5– 7,9]. The question from exact arises diagonalization with a Dirac spin liquid wave function and propose a scenario where this wave function in DMRG calculation χ i j k either the for the three spins in all0.4 the triangles using large-scale density matrix renormalization groupwhether geometry. With increasing J (J /J ! 0.3) and J (J /J ! 1.0) interactions, we establish calculationaonCSLcylinder respectively) can indeed be realized expansion on describes the triangular to the second ◦ order at half-filling the quantum critical point between the 120 magnetically ordered phase and a putative Z spin liquid. 2 latticea quantum phase proposed. In a recent study as originally [10] this ⃗i × S⃗j ) · S⃗k with gapless spin liquid [67 2 2 1 χ χ 1 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035141 oped due 0.3 diagram with the magnetically ordered 120 , stripe, and noncoplanar tetrahedral phase. Inwas ◦ between these magnetic gives the for effective N ! 3. In this paper chiral we interaction Jχ (S Jχ shown for SU(N) models order phases, we find a chiral spin liquid (CSL) phase, which is identified as a ν = 1/2 bosonic fractional quantumevidence that indeed the CSL is stabilized ations, or provide Hall state with possible spontaneous rotational symmetry breaking. By switching on the chiral interaction, we 0.2 in a conclusive spin-1/2 J Heisenberg χ ∼ #t model 3 /U upon 2 , adding where a further I. # is INTRODUCTION scalar the magnetic flux χ J enclosed 3 ∼ #t /U whereby 2 1 the J (resp. χ We study the sys J ) is the nearest-neighbor find that the previously identified spin liquid in theCSL Heisenberg (resp., scalar chirality) coupling. in frustrated DMRG [78] with spi J -J triangular model (0.08 " J /J " 0.15) shows a phase nal study, 1 2 transition to the CSL phase at very small J . We also compute the spin triplet gap in bothchirality χ 2 1 spin liquidterm Sitriangle. ⃗ Jχ and phases, ⃗ ⃗ We · (Sj × Sk ), similar The emergence of quantum spin liquids in frustrated take to quantumRefs. J18,10]. [6– magnetism =is an1.0 Such as phenomenon exciting the energy in contem- scale. Using Another DMRG open question magnetism of the a term gap caninbetherealized as a lowest orderporaryeffective condensedHeisenberg triangular lattice is the nature of the intermediate phase in the S = 1/2 Heisenbergchoose two geometries 0.1 a large gap in the odd topological sector but a small or vanishing s the best our finite-size results suggest o 120 phase sector. We discuss the implications of our results on the nature of the spin liquidstripe Hamiltonian of thesimulation, phase phases. even Hubbard model upon weadding exhibit obtain # flux fascinating matter physics [1]. These states of matter a through properties quantum such phase as long-range ground-state diagram phase diagram as of theshown model with added J1-JJ2 SL next-nearest-neighbor couplings around J /J ≈ 1/8. Several d remains 0 0 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.075116 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25or by introducing in Fig. 1(d). the elementary plaquettes [6,29,30], entanglement ticle Besides excitations, relevantthe [2,3] or anyonic either via a magnetic for 120 field braiding a ◦ FIG. potential Néel phase, statistics of quasipar- 1. Approximate implementation of T = the authors 0 phase stripe [20,33,34] ofphase, diagram found 1 the Ja -J 2 χ 2 1 modeleither spin-Jdisordered the x axis (XC) o state. Recently artificial gauge fields in possible cold-atom uid phase, J 2 experiments [31,32]. andThethe time-reversal coupling constants thenfound invariant topological quantum computation [4]. relate tostabilized onOnly the very spin triangular liquid recently have cf. several lattice, in Eq. (1).numerical the The extent J -J studies model [35– 40] of phases is proposed inferred that a topological andin this 1(b). regime.These cylind vestigated I. INTRODUCTION Quantum spin liquid (QSL) is a kind of a long-range the phase boundaries of several ordered phases, suggesting the Hubbard possible strong competition of the different physical model (here parameters we mecha- t such and denote models phases been U as [5– J it 19]. 1 ∼ as t 2 to /U and J 1 be -J S=1/2 on frustrated square lattice 2 from in excitation realistic spectra local spin fromspin liquid ED on state 1 a of2some periodic kind might 36-site simulation cluster; see main text for details. Orange: S = 1 K.A1L and L are the num SL), we find a welarge advocate the regime presence of of∗ be realized triangular The exact nature of this phase yet remains unclear. In this paper a O(4) quantum y critical pointx RAP lculations FIG. 1. Model Hamiltonian and nismsquantum in the kagomephase spin liquiddiagram of thea fully frustrated magnetism. Although the Heisenberg model with [41– 44] separating the 120 Néel order from a putative Z regime. In particular, Triangular lattice Heisenberg models (120◦ are a Néel); paradigm light blue:of S = 0 $.E2b (CSL); ◦ green: S = 0 $.E2a, J1 -J2 spin S=1/2 on kagome lattice entangled state with fractionalized ARTICLEquasiparticles [1]. Since spin-1/2Received the proposal by P. W. Anderson, 1 -J the -J2014 χ Heisenberg concept Junderstanding 212Jan | Accepted 4 Sep 2014model of QSL has been gapped chiral spin liquid (CSL) [44,45] is found on smallonfurther-neighbor the triangular [15,16]lattice. or chiral (a) the noncoplanar by switching tetrahedral and [14] regular 120 Néel order [20– 23],$.E2a, interactions only nearest-neighbor interaction order $.E2b is known tofor degenerate large (Dirac/Z stabilize a $.E2b degenerate (stripy 2 spinJ spin χ , whose liquid); liquid. PHYSICAL magnetic dark blue: The diverging REVIEW order); spin S = 0 $.A1, correlation B 96, dark red / light Toat (2017) length 121118(R) study 2 this quantumthe phase di red: phase transition magnetic orderedwe phaseperform calculatio correlated | Published 10 Oct 2014 critical point and the neighboring first-order configuration is shown in Fig. 1(c). Below into the tetrahedral DOI: 10.1038/ncomms6137 playing an important role for strongly ◦ adding further interac- on the NN kagome model. alexander.wietek@uibk.ac.at S * materials and(b) e kagome are the schematic figures of the unconventional superconductors [2]. Although 120promising ◦ and the stripe magnetic tion terms may increase frustration S = 1 and M.A induce/ S = 0 magnetic$.E2a the stripy (tetrahedral collinear magnetic order). render the Chiral spin liquid and emergent Another spinanyons liquid candidate is the antifer- phase for disorder to the system. Experimentally, severalInvestigation ! 0.25, we identify P a CSL as the of the chiral unambiguous 1/2 antiferromagnetic identification bosonic of the intermediate Heisenberg 10. We keep spin liquid model up to 400 um phase order R G QSLs have been pursued for more than two decades [3– 9], on the XC and YC only recently such novel states have been found in realistic spin in a Kagome cylinders. lattice romagnet Mott The on the triangular edge-sharing model is insulator triangular has lattice. 2469-9950/2017/95(3)/035141(6) the Although J 2 with triangular lattice geometry E 035141-1 do not exhibit any materials sign of ν phase = challenging, using however.entangled pair states projected ©2017 American Physical Society o far from M nearest-neighbor J 1 , next-nearest-neighbor models [10– 23], in which geometric frustration and competing frustration it turns out present in the spin-1/2 NN triangular model, to J still 2 , and exhibit three-spin a 120 ◦ fractional scalar antiferromagnetic order quantum These include, for Hall example, P state the organic by magnetic ordering down to lowest temperatures [24– 27]. observing Mott insulators like the gapless chiral II. MODEL with the truncation err states. D interactions play important roles1 for developing chiral Jχ interactions. For all the triangles, B. Bauer , L. Cincio spin liquid 2, B.P. Keller3, M. Dolfi4[46,47]. One of the most promising spin liquid candidates is , G. VidalIn recent 2, S. sulators such the Trebstexperiments 5 & A.W.W. on chiral as κ-(ET) Cu (CN) 2 triangular interactions Ludwig 3 edge have mode. organic and EtMe Sb[Pd(dmit) 2 3 Mott 3 in- ] 2 2 The κ-(BEDT-TTF) strong Cu 2 (CN) 2 nematic 3 [24,25] or order EtMe [26,27] and are thus candidates realizing spin liquid physics. 3 of Sb[Pd(dmit)2 2 Laboratoire bond ] de Physiqueenergy We Théorique, Didier Poilblanc investigatesuggests the Heisenberg CNRS modeldewith and Université next-nearest-neighbor interactions with an additional uniform nearest- Toulouse, and Toulouse, France 31062
Abelian CSL in SU(N) models Enlarging SU(2) to SU(N) is known to destabilize magnetic order This talk: ⇤ sha1_base64="HqWri8oHDPKyePtqExKGFvdC7cU=">AAAB7nicbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBbBU0mKqMeiF48V7Ae0oWy2k3bpZhN3N0IJ/RFePCji1d/jzX/jts1BWx8MPN6bYWZekAiujet+O4W19Y3NreJ2aWd3b/+gfHjU0nGqGDZZLGLVCahGwSU2DTcCO4lCGgUC28H4dua3n1BpHssHM0nQj+hQ8pAzaqzU7unHlCrslytu1Z2DrBIvJxXI0eiXv3qDmKURSsME1brruYnxM6oMZwKnpV6qMaFsTIfYtVTSCLWfzc+dkjOrDEgYK1vSkLn6eyKjkdaTKLCdETUjvezNxP+8bmrCaz/jMkkNSrZYFKaCmJjMficDrpAZMbGEMsXtrYSNqKLM2IRKNgRv+eVV0qpVvctq7f6iUr/J4yjCCZzCOXhwBXW4gwY0gcEYnuEV3pzEeXHenY9Fa8HJZ47hD5zPH4hWj7Q=
NATURE PHYSICS DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS2878 LETTERS PUBLISHED ONLINE: 2 FEBRUARY 2014 | DOI: 10.1038/NPHYS2878 A one-dimensional liquid of fermions with tunable spin Guido Pagano1,2, Marco Mancini1,3, Giacomo Cappellini1, Pietro Lombardi1,3, Florian Schäfer1, Hui Hu4, Xia-Ji Liu4, Jacopo Catani1,5, Carlo Sias1,5, Massimo Inguscio1,3,5 and Leonardo Fallani1,3,5* Correlations in systems with spin degree of freedom are at the 1D systems with a high degree of complexity, including spin–orbit- heart of fundamental phenomena, ranging from magnetism to coupled materials22 or SU(N ) Heisenberg and Hubbard chains23,24 . superconductivity. The e�ects of correlations depend strongly Moreover, the investigation of these multi-component fermions on dimensionality, a striking example being one-dimensional is relevant for the simulation of field theories with extended (1D) electronic systems, extensively studied theoretically over SU(N ) symmetries25 .
X a chiral PEPS X the fundamentalWe representation of SU(N open strips provide complementary results. Finaly, for N = 4,will move then start by generalizi ansatz is also constructed providing a good vari-PEPS to a description of this SU In the following, we will investigate model (1) using whose ED plementary physical and DMRG spintechniques degrees providing (N of freedom ) 1 CSL overwh tr = J1 Pational ij + Jenergy 2 hi,ji bulk anyonic we kl consider andPenabling correlations. hhk,lii the Models and definitionsmost general SU(N)-sym to connect the edge spectra to thecording defined on a square lattice by to the of ing evidence fundamental irrep CSL a stable topological of SU(N phase. ), ical nature of this CSL phase is precisely established fro The here top + JR (P ijk +onPaijk defined 1 three-site interaction: X We then start by generalizing ) + lattice square X the Hamiltonian of (1) iJI by (P ijk onPevery placing, Ref. [28]spin- N-dimensional spin degree o 1 the Nchiral ijk ),lattice site, aand ters) N = -fold GSPEPS. and3, (ii)we the shall Following degeneracy existence on a torusthe focusof chiral on the edge prescription geometry Nmodes (periodic = 4–case obse Model 4ijk N-dimensional spin degree defined in terms 4ijk Xthe fundamental of X representatio of freedom, which transforms as permutation the fundamental representation of SU(N ). As for N = 3, both features on open observed systems for and these in the three entanglement values finite cylinders – whose content follows exactly the pr of Nspectra allow o we (SU(N) consider the most H=J symmetry) general P + J SU(N)-symmetric the first (second) term corresponds to two-site permu- P short-range heuristic tion of rules the SU and (N )conclusions WZW CFT for theory. general In a N second . step we consider the most genera 1 ij 2 kl 1 three-site interaction: will move to a description of this SU (N ) CSL phase u s over all (next-)nearest-neighbor bonds, and the third 1 X X J + iJ sha1_base64="/SIukbnPPIEqDwh9+ygqqM24ijk=">AAAB73icbVBNS8NAEJ3Ur1q/qh69LBZBEEpSinosetGeqtgPaEPYbDft0s0m7m6EEvonvHhQxKt/x5v/xm2bg7Y+GHi8N8PMPD/mTGnb/rZyK6tr6xv5zcLW9s7uXnH/oKWiRBLaJBGPZMfHinImaFMzzWknlhSHPqdtf3Q99dtPVCoWiQc9jqkb4oFgASNYG6lT9+7PWN279Yolu2zPgJaJk5ESZGh4xa9ePyJJSIUmHCvVdexYuymWmhFOJ4VeomiMyQgPaNdQgUOq3HR27wSdGKWPgkiaEhrN1N8TKQ6VGoe+6QyxHqpFbyr+53UTHVy6KRNxoqkg80VBwpGO0PR51GeSEs3HhmAimbkVkSGWmGgTUcGE4Cy+vExalbJzXq7cVUu1qyyOPBzBMZyCAxdQgxtoQBMIcHiGV3izHq0X6936mLfmrGzmEP7A+vwBCYyPUg==
Numerical methods for SU(N) ... an introduction Analytics: large-N, mean-field, parton wavefunctions g tableau: α PRL ; 2 ;127204 ¼ ½3113, 2 %; (2014) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS week ending erator ofExact diagonalization (U(1)+lattice symmetries or SU(N) symmetry) • 19 SEPTEMBER 2014 the dimension les of standard tableaux ence. (e) Normal product week ending using standard Young tableaux PRL 113, 127204 (2014) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 19 SEPTEMBER 2014 Exact Diagonalization of Heisenberg SUðNÞ Models Pierre Nataf and Frédéric Mila to the main diagonal, Institute of Theoretical Physics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland (Received 23 May 2014; published 18 September 2014) for a box above (below) Building on advanced results on permutations, we show that it is possible to construct, for each irreducible representation of SUðNÞ, an orthonormal basis labeled by the set of standard Young tableaux in which the matrix of the Heisenberg SUðNÞ model (the quantum permutation of N-color objects) takes Hilbert space FIG. can 1. (a)be Example of a Young tableau: α ¼ ½3 ; 2 ; 2 %; an explicit and extremely simple form. Since the relative dimension of the full Hilbert space to that of the singlet space on n sites increases very fast with N, this formulation allows us to extend exact α (b) Integers di;N that enter the numerator of the dimension ere V is the of α;Hilbert (c) Hook lengths li ; (d) Examples of standard tableaux diagonalizations of finite clusters to much larger values of N than accessible so far. Using this method, we show that, on the square lattice, there is long-range color order for SU(5), spontaneous dimerization for SU(8), and evidence in favor of a quantum liquid for SU(10). α α ranked according to the last letter sequence. (e) Normal product dN > 1, V can ½3itself;2 ;2 % DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.127204 PACS numbers: 75.10.Jm, 02.70.-c, 67.85.-d, 71.10.Fd state jΦ1α i ¼ jAAABBCCi. ent subsectors V i as There is currently considerable experimental activity on decreases when the dimension of the local Hilbert space α α α distance from the ith box to the main diagonal, dimðV Þ ¼ f dN and algebraic ultracold multicomponent fermions [1–3]. When loaded in an optical lattice, these systems are expected to be, for increases, and EDs are severely limited by the size of the available clusters. Alternatives are clearly called for. counted positively (resp. negatively) for a box above (below) integer number of particles per site and sufficiently large In this Letter, we introduce a simple method to perform the diagonal (see Fig. 1). The full Hilbert space can be on-site repulsion, in a Mott insulating phase described by EDs of any quantum permutation Hamiltonian separately in ⊗n the SUðNÞ Heisenberg model [4–7]. This effective model each irreducible representation (irrep) of SUðNÞ. Since the ty is that, since it has ⊕ α α decomposed as □ ¼ α V , where V is the Hilbert is a generalization of the familiar SU(2) model, and in the dimension of the irreps relevant at low energy (for instance FIG. α using 2 (color online). α SU(N) Real-space U(1) space associated to irrep α, and, if dαN > 1, V α can itself (N-1hPCartan) case of one particle per site, it takes the general form of a correlations i −1=N for quantum permutation Hamiltonian: the singlet, to which the ground state belongs) is much smaller than that of the sector used in traditional ED, this
energy, correlati Monte Carlo methods in many cases. Tensor network representation.—The method proposed The key observ Numerical methods for SU(N) here can be applied to any spin, bosonic, or fermionic systems, but we shall use spin-1=2 lattice models as illustrations [see Fig. 1(a)]. The lattice sites are labeled by j ∈ ½1; N" and the spin operators are Saj (a ¼ x, y, z). single-particle o bond dimension ! The Abrikosov fermion representation is Saj ¼ d†m ¼ P † a ... an introduction 1 2 αβ cjα τ αβ c jβ , where c† jα (cjα ) are fermionic creation (annihilation) operators at j, α ¼ ↑; ↓ is the spin index, and One dummy col τa are Pauli matrices. This is an overcomplete representa- ensure that all M tion with unphysical states (empty and doubly occupied) the dummy vect that need to be removed by the single-occupancy constraint recover a usual M Analytics: large-N, mean-field, parton wavefunctions P † α cjα cjα ¼ 1. The Schwinger boson representation is very similar, where the fermionic operators are replaced then straightforw tion of Eq. (1) by their bosonic counterparts. MPOs correspo • Exact diagonalization (U(1)+lattice symmetries or SU(N) symmetry) One popular class of trial wave functions for spin models is the projected Fermi sea (2) apply the pro Pj acting on tw YN tensor network jΨi ¼ PG d†m j0i; ð1Þ bosonic paired m¼1 create fermionic • DMRG (U(1) or SU(N) symmetry) + parton wavefunction where j0i is the vacuum, † QN the dm are single-particle orbitals Compressing derived above of the partons, PG ¼ j¼1 Pj is a product of projectors that computed simpl contraction of closed loops is it imperative to Projected Fermi sea would enable ac sequentially act (a) (b) vacuum as the has a tensor network representation However, the exponentially w to carry out the p MPO: D=2 end, we need to PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 124, 246401 (2020) that its bond dim The simplest t FIG. 1. (a) Schematics of parton construction for spin-1=2 decomposition, latticeREVIEW PHYSICAL LETTERS models. (b) Schematics 124,network of the tensor 246401 (2020) so-called mixed representa- using MPO-MPS compression -> MPS tion of the projected Fermi sea in Eq. (1). gular values [3 Tensor Network Representations of Parton Wave Functions 246401-2 4,* Ying-Hai Wu ,1 Lei Wang,2,3 and Hong-Hao Tu 1 School of Physics and WuhanNetwork Tensor Representations National High Magnetic Field Center, Huazhong Wave of Parton Functions University of Science and Tec Wuhan 430074, China
Numerical methods for SU(N) ... an introduction Analytics: large-N, mean-field, parton wavefunctions • Exact diagonalization (U(1)+lattice symmetries or SU(N) symmetry) • DMRG (U(1) or SU(N) symmetry) + parton wavefunction SciPost Phys. Le • PEPS using SU(N) symmetric tensors + lattice point-group symmetry Both DMRG and PEPS can use SU(N) symmetry, e.g. QSpace library , Andreas Weichselbaum
Chiral spin liquid with PEPS PHYSICAL REVIEW B 94, 205124 (2016) Using a classification of SU(2)-invariant PEPS Systematic construction of spin liquids on the square lattice from tensor networks with SU(2) symmetry Matthieu Mambrini,1 Román Orús,2 and Didier Poilblanc1 1 Laboratoire de Physique Théorique, C.N.R.S. and Université de Toulouse, 31062 Toulouse, France 2 Institute of Physics, Johannes Gutenberg University, 55099 Mainz, Germany (Received 29 August 2016; published 14 November 2016) * virtual space : V = S1 S2 · · · Sp We elaborate a simple classification scheme of all rank-5 SU(2) spin rotational symmetric tensors accordin (i) the onsite physical spin S, (ii) the local Hilbert space V ⊗4 of the four virtual (composite) spins attached to e sha1_base64="HKaUFo9NzK8erjB3jXMjRffK4Kk=">AAACFHicbZBNS8MwGMfT+TbnW9Wjl+AQBGG0Q9CLMPTicTL3AmspaZpuYWlTklQYZR/Ci1/FiwdFvHrw5rcx7XrQzQcCv/yflzz5+wmjUlnWt1FZWV1b36hu1ra2d3b3zP2DnuSpwKSLOeNi4CNJGI1JV1HFyCARBEU+I31/cpPn+w9ESMrjezVNiBuhUUxDipHSkmeeOcWMTJBgBntXHc92eMJSCTtec04ODrjK74ln1q2GVQRcBruEOiij7ZlfTsBxGpFYYYakHNpWotwMCUUxI7Oak0qSIDxBIzLUGKOISDcrFprBE60EMORCn1jBQv3dkaFIymnk68oIqbFczOXif7lhqsJLN6NxkioS4/lDYcqg4jB3CAZUEKzYVAPCgupdIR4jgbDSPta0Cfbil5eh12zYmu/O663r0o4qOALH4BTY4AK0wC1ogy7A4BE8g1fwZjwZL8a78TEvrRhlzyH4E8bnD4i9nno= sha1_base64="HKaUFo9NzK8erjB3jXMjRffK4Kk=">AAACFHicbZBNS8MwGMfT+TbnW9Wjl+AQBGG0Q9CLMPTicTL3AmspaZpuYWlTklQYZR/Ci1/FiwdFvHrw5rcx7XrQzQcCv/yflzz5+wmjUlnWt1FZWV1b36hu1ra2d3b3zP2DnuSpwKSLOeNi4CNJGI1JV1HFyCARBEU+I31/cpPn+w9ESMrjezVNiBuhUUxDipHSkmeeOcWMTJBgBntXHc92eMJSCTtec04ODrjK74ln1q2GVQRcBruEOiij7ZlfTsBxGpFYYYakHNpWotwMCUUxI7Oak0qSIDxBIzLUGKOISDcrFprBE60EMORCn1jBQv3dkaFIymnk68oIqbFczOXif7lhqsJLN6NxkioS4/lDYcqg4jB3CAZUEKzYVAPCgupdIR4jgbDSPta0Cfbil5eh12zYmu/O663r0o4qOALH4BTY4AK0wC1ogy7A4BE8g1fwZjwZL8a78TEvrRhlzyH4E8bnD4i9nno=AAACFHicbZBNS8MwGMfT+TbnW9Wjl+AQBGG0Q9CLMPTicTL3AmspaZpuYWlTklQYZR/Ci1/FiwdFvHrw5rcx7XrQzQcCv/yflzz5+wmjUlnWt1FZWV1b36hu1ra2d3b3zP2DnuSpwKSLOeNi4CNJGI1JV1HFyCARBEU+I31/cpPn+w9ESMrjezVNiBuhUUxDipHSkmeeOcWMTJBgBntXHc92eMJSCTtec04ODrjK74ln1q2GVQRcBruEOiij7ZlfTsBxGpFYYYakHNpWotwMCUUxI7Oak0qSIDxBIzLUGKOISDcrFprBE60EMORCn1jBQv3dkaFIymnk68oIqbFczOXif7lhqsJLN6NxkioS4/lDYcqg4jB3CAZUEKzYVAPCgupdIR4jgbDSPta0Cfbil5eh12zYmu/O663r0o4qOALH4BTY4AK0wC1ogy7A4BE8g1fwZjwZL8a78TEvrRhlzyH4E8bnD4i9nno=AAACFHicbZBNS8MwGMfT+TbnW9Wjl+AQBGG0Q9CLMPTicTL3AmspaZpuYWlTklQYZR/Ci1/FiwdFvHrw5rcx7XrQzQcCv/yflzz5+wmjUlnWt1FZWV1b36hu1ra2d3b3zP2DnuSpwKSLOeNi4CNJGI1JV1HFyCARBEU+I31/cpPn+w9ESMrjezVNiBuhUUxDipHSkmeeOcWMTJBgBntXHc92eMJSCTtec04ODrjK74ln1q2GVQRcBruEOiij7ZlfTsBxGpFYYYakHNpWotwMCUUxI7Oak0qSIDxBIzLUGKOISDcrFprBE60EMORCn1jBQv3dkaFIymnk68oIqbFczOXif7lhqsJLN6NxkioS4/lDYcqg4jB3CAZUEKzYVAPCgupdIR4jgbDSPta0Cfbil5eh12zYmu/O663r0o4qOALH4BTY4AK0wC1ogy7A4BE8g1fwZjwZL8a78TEvrRhlzyH4E8bnD4i9nno=
Exact Diagonalization on torus Predictions: • If Ns=k*N: singlet ground-state degeneracy on a torus = N we start by examining, for larger N obtained on Ns -site periodic cluster about clusters used). We first consid an integer multiple of N so that, in particle excitations would be popula gap above of the the Nspectra singlet energy quasi-for fixe sus deg, are shown in Fig. 1 for N ran ground-states For all the values of N studied here values, a clear gap is observed betwe and quasi-degenerate states and the trum. Interestingly, we note that = a pure imaginary E 3-site cyclic permu within the gapped phase (except perh In 2d: generalization FIG. 2. Zoom of Hastings-Oshikawa-Lieb-Mattis of the singlet low energy spectra at ✓ = ⇡/4 and = ⇡/4 instead was chosen in Ref. theorem = ⇡/2, for N ranging from 2 to 10, and the same cluster sizes as is also stable within a significant rang forbids a non-degenerate gapped state in Fig. 1 (for N = 2, Ns = 20). The GS energy is subtracted off for yond ✓ = ⇡/4, e.g. also at ✓ = ⇡/6. gaplessbetter orcomparison discrete symmetry between breaking the various spectra. The exact or we shall mostly report results obtain topological degeneracy
5 5 5 5 Exact Diagonalization on torus excitation energy 4 M 4 7 3 4 4 0 6 2 Σ0 3 Γ X Γ 5 Σ2 3 2 3 1 0 Γ Predictions: 1 8 4 0 3 1 Σ1 3 2 • If Ns=k*N: singlet ground-state degeneracy on a torus = N 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 • Lattice momenta can be obtained from a generalized Pauli principle 0 0 0 0 Haldane, Bernevig, Regnault,…. M.Eb Γ.A Γ.A Γ.B Γ.B M.Ea Γ.A Γ.B Γ.Eb Γ.Ea M.A M.B X.A X.B Γ.A Γ.B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 0 1 2 0 1 2 3 Σ0 Σ1 Σ2 6 6 M 6 X 6 6 ∆ 6 3 6 2 6 Σ Z 0 4 5 0 5 Γ 0 Γ 0 24 Γ 3 5 Z1 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 1 1 excitation energy 1 excitation energy we start 4 by examining, for larger N , theM low-energy 4 spectra 7 3 4 obtained on Ns -site periodic4 clusters (see Table I for details 4 6 2 4 4 4 0 Σ0 3 about clusters used). We first consider Γ X the case of Ns being Γ 5 Σ2 3 an integer multiple of N so that, in2 a CSL 3phase, no quasi- 3 8 4 1 Γ 0 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 particle excitations would be populating the GS. A selection 0 of the singlet energy spectra for fixed ✓ = ⇡/4, plotted ver- Σ1 2 2 sus 2, are shown in Fig. 1 for 2 N ranging N = 4 to N = 10. 2 2 2 2 For all the values of N studied here, in a broad interval of 1 values, 1 a clear gap is observed1 between a group 1 of degenerate 1 0 quasi-hole 1 1 1 and quasi-degenerate states and the rest of the singlet spec- 0 quasi-hole trum. Interestingly, we note that = ⇡/2 – corresponding to 7 0 a pure0 imaginary 3-site cyclic0 permutation –0 is alway located within the gapped phase (except perhaps for N = 3 for which 4 0 0 0 0 Γ.Ea Γ.A Γ.B ∆ M.A M.B Γ.B 0 Γ.Ea 1 M.AΣ 0 M.EaZ1 Γ.A X.A Γ.Eb Γ.B X.B Γ.A Γ.B Γ.A Γ.B 0 Γ.A 1 2 3 34 80 1 2 3 Γ.B 4 5 = ⇡/4 instead was chosen in Ref. [28]). The gapped phase M.BZ M.Eb Γ.A Γ.B Γ.Eb X.A X.B Γ.A 0 1 2 4 5 6 7 0 1 0 1 2 3 0 Σ1 Σ2 FIG. 2. Zoom of the singlet low energy spectra at ✓ = ⇡/4 and Σ = ⇡/2, for N ranging from 2 to 10, and the same cluster sizes as is also stable within a significant range of the parameter ✓, be- in Fig. 1 (for N = 2, Ns = 20). The GS energy is subtracted off for yond ✓ = ⇡/4, e.g. also at ✓ = ⇡/6. Hence, in the following,
Exact Diagonalization on torus Predictions: 6 6 6 6 • If Ns=k*N: singlet ground-state degeneracy on a torus = N 5 5 5 5 excitation energy 4 M 4 7 3 4 4 X 0 6 2 Σ0 2 3 Γ X Γ 5 Σ2 4 • Lattice momenta can be obtained from a generalized Pauli principle 3 2 1 3 8 4 1 0 3 Γ 1 0 Σ1 3 Γ 5 3 0 1 2 2 Haldane, Bernevig, Regnault,…. 2 2 • Quasi-hole counting: deg=Ns, 1 per momentum sector 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 4 5 X.A M.Eb Γ.A Γ.A X.B Γ.B Γ.B M.Ea Γ.A Γ.B Γ.Eb Γ.Ea M.A M.B X.A X.B Γ.A Γ.B 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 Σ0 Σ1 Σ2 6 6 we start 6by examining, for larger N , 6the low-energy spectra M 3 6 6 X 2 6 6 0 ∆ 0 Σ Z obtained 5 on Ns -site periodic clusters5 (see Table I for details 0 Γ 4 0 Γ 2 Γ 2 Γ 3 1 about clusters 5 used). We first consider 0 Z 5 the case of Ns being 1 5 5 5 5 4 5 1 an integer multiple of N so that, 1 in a CSL phase, no quasi- 1 excitation energy excitation energy 4 M 4 7 3 particle 4excitations would be0 populating 4 the GS. A selection6 2 4 4 4 4 X 2 Σ 0 of the singlet energy spectraΓ 3 2 Xfor fixed ✓ = ⇡/4, plotted Γ 5ver- Σ 4 0 2 3 3 1 0 sus , are 3 shown in Fig. 1 for 1 N ranging3 N = 4 to N 8=4 10. 0 3 3 Γ 1 3 3 Γ 3 For all the values of N studied here, in a broad interval of Σ 5 1 1 2 2 values, a2 clear gap is observed between 2 a group of degenerate 2 2 0 quasi-hole 2 2 and quasi-degenerate states and the rest of the singlet spec- 1 10 quasi-hole 1 1 1 quasi-hole 1 1 trum. Interestingly, we note that = ⇡/2 – corresponding to 1 1 1 quasi-hole a pure imaginary 3-site cyclic permutation – is alway located 0 0 0 0 0 0 within the gapped phase (except perhaps for N = 3 for which 0 0 = ⇡/4 instead was chosen in Ref. [28]). The gapped phase Γ.Ea Γ.A Γ.B M.B ∆ M.A M.B 0 3 1 X.A Σ Z0 Z1 Γ.A ΣX.A Γ.Eb Γ.B X.B Γ.A Γ.B Γ.A Γ.B 3 0 1 6 2 3 4 0 0 1 2 Σ0 3 4 5 0 X.A 1 2 FIG. 2. Zoom of the singlet low energy spectra at ✓ = ⇡/4 and M.Eb Γ.A Γ.A X.B Γ.B Γ.B M.Ea Γ.A Γ.B Γ.Eb Γ.Ea M.A X.B Γ.A Γ.B 0 1 2 4 5 7 8 1 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 Σ1 2 = ⇡/2, for N ranging from 2 to 10, and the same cluster sizes as is also stable within a significant range of the parameter ✓, be- in Fig. 1 (for N = 2, Ns = 20). The GS energy is subtracted off for yond FIG. ✓ = 3.⇡/4, e.g. also spectra Low-energy at ✓ = on M ⇡/6. Hence, periodic in theatfollowing, clusters 19 fixed = ⇡/2 and for ✓ = ⇡/4 (a-d)Xor ✓ = ⇡/6 (e-h). Clusters with site numbe 13
l l0 3 q 1 q7/5 0 q 2/5 17/5 on energy excitation energyOrder excitation energy excitation energy l l0 4 2 q 12/5 2 1 1 2 q 1 q 2 1 Order 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 0 q0 1 • 5 2 1 1 1 3 q3 2 • • 24 4 2 45 45 45 Irreps / Multiplicities 24 24 1 1 Irreps / Multiplicities 2 1 50 50 75 75 2 1 1 70 70 TABLE XII. SU(5)1 WZW model – Tower of states starting from 5 126 1 sha1_base64="ADfmFTOd5eHhzCKJs+DIuzX9P+4=">AAAB63icbVBNS8NAEJ34WetX1aOXxSJ4KkkR9Vj04rGC/YA2lM120i7d3YTdjVBC/4IXD4p49Q9589+YtDlo64OBx3szzMwLYsGNdd1vZ219Y3Nru7RT3t3bPzisHB23TZRohi0WiUh3A2pQcIUty63AbqyRykBgJ5jc5X7nCbXhkXq00xh9SUeKh5xRm0t9FGJQqbo1dw6ySryCVKFAc1D56g8jlkhUlglqTM9zY+unVFvOBM7K/cRgTNmEjrCXUUUlGj+d3zoj55kyJGGks1KWzNXfEymVxkxlkHVKasdm2cvF/7xeYsMbP+UqTiwqtlgUJoLYiOSPkyHXyKyYZoQyzbNbCRtTTZnN4ilnIXjLL6+Sdr3mXdXqD5fVxm0RRwlO4QwuwINraMA9NKEFDMbwDK/w5kjnxXl3Phata04xcwJ/4Hz+AA+wjkI= AAAB63icbVBNS8NAEJ34WetX1aOXxSJ4KkkR9Vj04rGC/YA2lM120i7d3YTdjVBC/4IXD4p49Q9589+YtDlo64OBx3szzMwLYsGNdd1vZ219Y3Nru7RT3t3bPzisHB23TZRohi0WiUh3A2pQcIUty63AbqyRykBgJ5jc5X7nCbXhkXq00xh9SUeKh5xRm0t9FGJQqbo1dw6ySryCVKFAc1D56g8jlkhUlglqTM9zY+unVFvOBM7K/cRgTNmEjrCXUUUlGj+d3zoj55kyJGGks1KWzNXfEymVxkxlkHVKasdm2cvF/7xeYsMbP+UqTiwqtlgUJoLYiOSPkyHXyKyYZoQyzbNbCRtTTZnN4ilnIXjLL6+Sdr3mXdXqD5fVxm0RRwlO4QwuwINraMA9NKEFDMbwDK/w5kjnxXl3Phata04xcwJ/4Hz+AA+wjkI= AAAB63icbVBNS8NAEJ34WetX1aOXxSJ4KkkR9Vj04rGC/YA2lM120i7d3YTdjVBC/4IXD4p49Q9589+YtDlo64OBx3szzMwLYsGNdd1vZ219Y3Nru7RT3t3bPzisHB23TZRohi0WiUh3A2pQcIUty63AbqyRykBgJ5jc5X7nCbXhkXq00xh9SUeKh5xRm0t9FGJQqbo1dw6ySryCVKFAc1D56g8jlkhUlglqTM9zY+unVFvOBM7K/cRgTNmEjrCXUUUlGj+d3zoj55kyJGGks1KWzNXfEymVxkxlkHVKasdm2cvF/7xeYsMbP+UqTiwqtlgUJoLYiOSPkyHXyKyYZoQyzbNbCRtTTZnN4ilnIXjLL6+Sdr3mXdXqD5fVxm0RRwlO4QwuwINraMA9NKEFDMbwDK/w5kjnxXl3Phata04xcwJ/4Hz+AA+wjkI= AAAB63icbVBNS8NAEJ34WetX1aOXxSJ4KkkR9Vj04rGC/YA2lM120i7d3YTdjVBC/4IXD4p49Q9589+YtDlo64OBx3szzMwLYsGNdd1vZ219Y3Nru7RT3t3bPzisHB23TZRohi0WiUh3A2pQcIUty63AbqyRykBgJ5jc5X7nCbXhkXq00xh9SUeKh5xRm0t9FGJQqbo1dw6ySryCVKFAc1D56g8jlkhUlglqTM9zY+unVFvOBM7K/cRgTNmEjrCXUUUlGj+d3zoj55kyJGGks1KWzNXfEymVxkxlkHVKasdm2cvF/7xeYsMbP+UqTiwqtlgUJoLYiOSPkyHXyKyYZoQyzbNbCRtTTZnN4ilnIXjLL6+Sdr3mXdXqD5fVxm0RRwlO4QwuwINraMA9NKEFDMbwDK/w5kjnxXl3Phata04xcwJ/4Hz+AA+wjkI= AAAB63icbVBNS8NAEJ34WetX1aOXxSJ4KkkR9Vj04rGC/YA2lM120i7d3YTdjVBC/4IXD4p49Q9589+YtDlo64OBx3szzMwLYsGNdd1vZ219Y3Nru7RT3t3bPzisHB23TZRohi0WiUh3A2pQcIUty63AbqyRykBgJ5jc5X7nCbXhkXq00xh9SUeKh5xRm0t9FGJQqbo1dw6ySryCVKFAc1D56g8jlkhUlglqTM9zY+unVFvOBM7K/cRgTNmEjrCXUUUlGj+d3zoj55kyJGGks1KWzNXfEymVxkxlkHVKasdm2cvF/7xeYsMbP+UqTiwqtlgUJoLYiOSPkyHXyKyYZoQyzbNbCRtTTZnN4ilnIXjLL6+Sdr3mXdXqD5fVxm0RRwlO4QwuwINraMA9NKEFDMbwDK/w5kjnxXl3Phata04xcwJ/4Hz+AA+wjkI=
DMRG Wu, Wang, Tu, PRL 124, 246401 (2020) 8 •Parton construction is useful to boost DMRG convergence Spectrum on cylinder vs ky TABLE II. SU(2)1 WZW model – The direct product of the confor- mal tower of the spin-1/2 primary (left - see Table V in Appendix B) Exact zero-mode edge states with a spin-1/2 gives a new tower (right) with a doubling of the num- ber of states in each Virasoro level indexed by l l0 . 2 2 2 l Construct l0 tower 2 N different towerminimally ⌦ 3 1 0 1 entangled states 1 • 1 to target 2 3 1 1 different1 excitations • 1 1 2 4 ! 3 5 1 2 1 1 1 • 2 1 •Probe entanglement spectrum as fingerprint 3 2 of 1 topological 2 • 3 order 1 10 2 4 1 3 5 11 2 4 1 3 5 4 3 2 3 • 5 2 lations [48]. For N = 2, it is known that the exact zero modes play an important role in constructing the MESs [44, 46]. These exact zero modes, denoted by dL and dR , localize m e n t ! at the two boundaries of the cylinder. Their occurrence at a g re e p e r f 3̄ ect 3̄ the single-particle momentum ky = ⇡/2 requires that for mod(Ny , 4) = 0 (mod(Ny , 4) = 2), the parton Hamilto- 3 3 FIG. 8. The entanglement spectra on width-6 cylinders for SU(3) CSLs. (a) Identity sector. (b) sector (⌦ ). (c) sector (⌦ ). The
Subtlety in choosing MES basis DMRG SU(N) subtleties Subtlety in choosing MES basis Subtlety in choosing MES basis = † † G ↑ ↓ FS Hong-Hao Tu et al. Semion sector: Semion sector: Semion sector: † † = G ↑ FS † † ↓ = G ↑ ↓ FS Semion sector = † † G ↑ ↓ FS not a singlet SU(2)Spincase Not a spin-singlet! singlet: Spin singlet: † † † † − ′ = G ( ↑ ↓ − ↓ ↑ ) FS ′ † † † † − = G ( ↑ ↓ − ↓ ↑ ) FS singlet Entanglement spectrum: Not a spin-singlet! two copies of semion conformal towers ( 1/2 ⊗ semion ) Entanglement spectrum: two copies of semion conformal towers ( 1/2 ⊗ semion ) Entanglement spectrum= two copies of “semion” conformal towers ¯ ¯
pendix D as exam- the A2 1 Bdirect 1 product 1 2 =2 of each 1 2 2 3 3 3 3 5 V = around 4 N • each· site · · can be made > N following 1 heuristic(8)rules valid havecaseus = •B1 1 ··· 1 N 1 (8) for all N (which we will > generalize to the non-Abelian allofagreement te 2 its primary spin with > > ; 2 (see 2 3 3 5 PEPS where the direct sum contains all N irreps defined in the conclusion). In ; other words, we construct the Matrix spin- tain the and I in Appendix ABLE III. = 4,ofDrespec- N Number as exam- symmetric site-tensors in each class charac- column Young SU(N ) PEPS from site/bond tensors with virtual space, tableaux of 0 up to N 1 boxes, variatio co in overall agreement rized by the irrep of the with point group of the square lattice (lines) spectra ngle C N XXVI, d the occupation = 3 and XXVII Nnumbers ofand = 4, 4v the 6,4, 4̄ andwhere respec- with the(columns). 1 particles the direct sum contains all N irreps defined by single the larg N •Symmetric = 2 and PEPS N = 3 cases, construction V = 1 2 and um contains all N irreps defined column by single Young tableaux of 0 up to N 1 boxes, consistently 2 9 each CT entlyTables XXVI, XXVII leaux of 0 up to N 1 boxes,with and 3̄.NFor 3consistently the =FIG.2the and N 10. PEPSN= = on3the caseVlattice 4cases, square 2we = then 1 involving 2 assume and site A V> > =tensors 3 = 1 V and 4 =symmet6 bond B tensors. The bondVdimension on the black links is up QSpace dr1such 3 cases, Vby N =a multiplicity = 1 2 and 2 taking the direct3 (withV 3̄. For 3 bond = product 1the N oftoeach dimension virtual= 1350, 4 case space: we and the vertical red then assume = Dsegments N • = 15). V 4 Note · correspond · = · 6 to > the dthat 4 N D, = N the 4̄ 1 1 of (8) site singu > ; 4 casetower =onformal we then with assume the conjugateV4 of = (with 4bond 6 primary its 4̄spindimension 1(see degreesDof = physical 15). Note that the freedom. site tensor A reps. S 4̄sion 1 ables XXVID = 15). Note that the can , XXVII and XXVIII in can sitebe Appendix be seen seen as tensor D as as a linear map A a linear map (VN ) ! F, and the bond tensor exam- ⌦z (V N ) ⌦z ! F, and the of all b de ores). S FT asA ear This map shown brings (V )our ⌦z simulations ! F, andin overall B the B asas bond : agreement : inNFigs. 8 and 9 for N = 3 and N = 4, respec-(V (V tensor N ) ⌦2 with N )! ⌦2 •. ! where•. the direct sum contains The simplest adequate ansatz has the following form, all N irreps defined byhave inc single control column Young tableaux of 0 up to N 1 boxes, consistently . and a direct comparison with Tables XXVI, nsor vely, construction XVIII (see Appendix D). As As forXXVIIN for =and N 2 and = with 3, 2the we and N = classify 2 and N 3, X N R we =the 3 SU(4)-symmetric cases,N V2 = 1 classify X I the 2 and V3 = 1 SU(4)- w.r.t. optimiz it andCSL we breaksclassifyP andthe T site-tensors SU(4)-symmetric but not PT according A 3= to A3̄. (i) For + the iAthe N =particle = 4 case R A occupations a we+ then i assume I A b , n V =(9)= 6 4 4̄ 1 ction 3, 4 R I a R b I occ variatio ding to (i) the particle occupations noccP {nsite-tensors 6 , n 4 , n 4̄ , = n 1 } according on (with the zbond = 4to dimension a=1 (i) virtual D the= spaces particle 15).b=1Note connected can be seen as a linear map (VN ) ! F, and the bondconside ⌦z that occupatio the site to tensor estimate tensor A n of on the chiral PEPS z = is4 avirtual Tensor used linear for spaces each combination IV. IPEPS connectedsite ( {n6 , nof4 ,point-group n where↵ = ton4̄ , n1B}as (V the z) real and on (ii) N ) the elementary SU(N) ⌦2 the (1-dimensional) •.z = R4 virtual tensors !symmetric A a and A ones b either irreptrans-of spaces co detric N = 3 (see Ref. [28]). and (ii) the (1-dimensional) the C4v pointform irrep of P group of the according square to the A1 and lattice A2 irreps, I [61]respectively, (see Tableor III). ac- e n t s = ral z) PEPS ng the network used represented A. Symmetric for each PEPS construction site ( cording Since the chiral spinsite-tensors n to As the liquid ↵ B =for 1 andN z) only B = 2 and 2 and irreps, breaks (ii) 3, we the respectively, P and classify T (1-dimensiona giving but the doesc rise o e to not c i SU(4)-symmetric ffi up of = the square •Optimization lattice is [61] performed (see Table using III).CTMRG two possible families A according and A to . (i) N the = particle 16 and f e w N occupations = 17 n = (see Ref. [28]). the point group of the square lattice [61] (see occ irtual cc 3 indices on the links break Cthe4vproduct are the PT, {nthe numbers , n PEPS of, the n , n A complex } on elementary B the site R tensors z = tensor 4 invirtual each A I should spaces class and connected to in liquid only breaks P and T but does notR 6 4 P 4̄ 1 d nk-2 We etwork tobond now tensors, extend the represented z being construction PT, the PEPS complex site tensor A should of be chiralinvariant Since PEPS used the (up a forto chiral and a sign) I each a spin under site are arbitrary ( real n↵PT liquid = symmetry z) and (ii) only coefficients but(1-dimensional) the breaks of these acquires tensors. P The a irrep and T of bu Both
sha1_base64="kfUz+zFRFc8YJ1o5U59S8+PZFc0=">AAAB63icbVC7SgNBFL3rM8ZXVLCxGQyCVdgVRMsQGytJwDwgWcLsZDYZMjO7zMwGwpJfsLFQxNbSv/AL7Gz8FmeTFJp44MLhnHu5954g5kwb1/1yVlbX1jc2c1v57Z3dvf3CwWFDR4kitE4iHqlWgDXlTNK6YYbTVqwoFgGnzWB4k/nNEVWaRfLejGPqC9yXLGQEm0y6647y3ULRLblToGXizUmxfFz7Zu+Vj2q38NnpRSQRVBrCsdZtz42Nn2JlGOF0ku8kmsaYDHGfti2VWFDtp9NbJ+jMKj0URsqWNGiq/p5IsdB6LALbKbAZ6EUvE//z2okJr/2UyTgxVJLZojDhyEQoexz1mKLE8LElmChmb0VkgBUmxsaTheAtvrxMGhcl77Lk1mwaFZghBydwCufgwRWU4RaqUAcCA3iAJ3h2hPPovDivs9YVZz5zBH/gvP0ASXWRcA== AAACG3icbVDLSgMxFM34rPU16tJNsAiuykwRdSPUunFZoS/oDEMmTdvQTDIkGaFM+x9u/BU3LhRxJbjwb8y0s9DWAyGHc+7l3nvCmFGlHefbWlldW9/YLGwVt3d29/btg8OWEonEpIkFE7ITIkUY5aSpqWakE0uCopCRdji6zfz2A5GKCt7Q45j4ERpw2qcYaSMFdsWTQxHcwGuYehHSQxnBhpwGNTjx6op6EvEBI9Bj+W+0SWCXnLIzA1wmbk5KIEc9sD+9nsBJRLjGDCnVdZ1Y+ymSmmJGpkUvUSRGeIQGpGsoRxFRfjq7bQpPjdKDfSHN4xrO1N8dKYqUGkehqcz2V4teJv7ndRPdv/JTyuNEE47ng/oJg1rALCjYo5JgzcaGICyp2RXiIZIIaxNn0YTgLp68TFqVsntRrtyfl6q1PI4COAYn4Ay44BJUwR2ogybA4BE8g1fwZj1ZL9a79TEvXbHyniPwB9bXDxLGoNg=
PEPS: entanglement spectrum infinite PEPS cylinder D=15 SU(4), Nv=4, full SU(N) symmetry 12 = 1350 sha1_base64="7DGu16HlBmlRFI/FC2R4MC9eNGU=">AAAB8HicbVDLSgNBEOyNrxhfUY9eBoPgKezG+LgIQS8eI5iHJEuYncwmQ2Zml5lZISz5Ci8eFPHq53jzb5wke9DEgoaiqpvuriDmTBvX/XZyK6tr6xv5zcLW9s7uXnH/oKmjRBHaIBGPVDvAmnImacMww2k7VhSLgNNWMLqd+q0nqjSL5IMZx9QXeCBZyAg2VnrskiG79s7O3V6x5JbdGdAy8TJSggz1XvGr249IIqg0hGOtO54bGz/FyjDC6aTQTTSNMRnhAe1YKrGg2k9nB0/QiVX6KIyULWnQTP09kWKh9VgEtlNgM9SL3lT8z+skJrzyUybjxFBJ5ovChCMToen3qM8UJYaPLcFEMXsrIkOsMDE2o4INwVt8eZk0K2Xvoly5r5ZqN1kceTiCYzgFDy6hBndQhwYQEPAMr/DmKOfFeXc+5q05J5s5hD9wPn8AUdKPcQ== AAAB63icbVC7SgNBFL3rM8ZXVLCxGQyCVdgVRMsQGytJwDwgWcLsZDYZMjO7zMwGwpJfsLFQxNbSv/AL7Gz8FmeTFJp44MLhnHu5954g5kwb1/1yVlbX1jc2c1v57Z3dvf3CwWFDR4kitE4iHqlWgDXlTNK6YYbTVqwoFgGnzWB4k/nNEVWaRfLejGPqC9yXLGQEm0y6647y3ULRLblToGXizUmxfFz7Zu+Vj2q38NnpRSQRVBrCsdZtz42Nn2JlGOF0ku8kmsaYDHGfti2VWFDtp9NbJ+jMKj0URsqWNGiq/p5IsdB6LALbKbAZ6EUvE//z2okJr/2UyTgxVJLZojDhyEQoexz1mKLE8LElmChmb0VkgBUmxsaTheAtvrxMGhcl77Lk1mwaFZghBydwCufgwRWU4RaqUAcCA3iAJ3h2hPPovDivs9YVZz5zBH/gvP0ASXWRcA==
matrix eigenvalues as ta ða ¼ 0; 1; …Þ with jt0 j > jt1 j > jt2 j > % % %, it turns out t0 is nondegenerate, suggesting nondegeneracy agrees with dimer operator bein PEPS: correlation lengths absence of long-range order in the variational wave rotation invariant. Depending on the parafermion ξparafermion have different values, both of which ar SU(3) than the spinon SU(4) correlation length. Interestingly, 10 0 correlation 5 lengths, except the spin(so correlation len that no anyons is present in acy is observed on small torii as -2 6 no sign of saturation with increasing χ,theinGS,agreem surability between N and N i populates N quasi-de s s 10 our expectation that the state is not 4 in the clusters following WZWZ pected. Finally, chiral many-bo CFT3c 5 10 -4 double phase. more stringent test of the exist CSL. -6 4 Degeneracy 3 structure of topological chiral iDMRG computations by en systems – typically P infinitely-lo 10 most valuable and complemen remarkable feature of our resultsGutwiller-projected is the corresp parton wa construct iDMRG ansatze in e 10 -8 3 between 2 the leading four eigenvalues to theirofSU(N the transf ) global singlet n tions carry larger entanglement -10 2 and the different sectors in the ES: The linear Q combinations ¼ 0 of MES, sex 10 hence, show ES with more stru (a) (b) one branch, 1 while Q ¼ & 1 each have standing three almo has been fully provide Following the prescriptions 10 -12 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 0 2 4 6 8 10 1 erate branches. 0 1 2 This 3 4 is 5 in 6direct have analogy to constricted a familly and, under optimization, a goo th of c leading eigenvalue t0 , which hasobtained trivial spin, for the chiral SU(4) H entanglement spectra obtained FIG. 13. Maximum correlation lengths obtained from the transfer Correlations in the bulk Correlation length approximate directly by D = 225. from matrix (in the absence ofthreefold transfer degeneracy numbers associatedmatrix gauge flux) plotted versus , normalized of tors , t , of atinfinitely-long 1 the chiral tiplicity of and cylindert 2 modes is FIG. 4. Different bulk correlations in the optimized PEPS. From 2 The SU(4) quantum to these have perfectly degenerate spins 3one. Finally, correlation lengths are indicated. and growing 3̄, correlatio matc of the singlet PEPS ansatz in al the correlations versus distance (computed with χ¼ 392) in (a), Nothesaturation we extract so using correlation lengths presumably gapless exponential fits, perfect which are state…tions [30].degeneracy between We believe such a property also holds Q ¼ for any & veryA (of1. smallsimilar mension are consistent with the co weight) in correl shown in (b) (using the same symbols), along with those extracted dence N = 4 due between to the large value of(approximate) SU(N ) CSL, although it could not be established here for the bond dimension D. degeneracy of plicitely for N = 2 [30]). We s tails would fade away (i.e. thei transfer operator and of the ES representation Dubail-Read branches 2015 vanish) for increasing D, provi was from the transfer matrix spectrum with or without flux inserted of the GS. If corr theorem [67] does not practica No-go (shown as lines), withtheorem for aof free-fermion g the degeneracy the eigenvalue. BothPEPSfortochiralhavePEPSs a bulk withgap V. CONCLUSION AND OUTLOOK SUð2Þ1 counting, PEPS representation where of the topo We note that the SU(N ) C approaches agree for the spinon, vison, and dimer correlation Is it also true in the interacting case ? be explained Heisenberg as models on the arising square lattice havefrom the In this work, the previous pairing potential and SU(3) chiral been generalized symmetry of where the 3-site interaction theis p to any SU(N ) fundamental irrep as physical degrees of free- ing to = ⇡/2), mostly stud relevant in ultracold atom syste
Abelian CSL: spontaneous T-breaking Topological CSL can also be found in the absence of explicit T-breaking week ending PRL 112, 137202 (2014) PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 4 APRIL 2014 PHYSICAL REVIEW B 92, 125122 (2015) Chiral Spin Liquid in a Frustrated Anisotropic Kagome Heisenberg Model WIETEK, STERDYNIAK, AND LÄUCHLI Nature of chiral spin liquids on the kagome lattice PHYSICAL REVIEW B 92, 125122 (2015) Yin-Chen He,1 D. N. Sheng,2 and Yan Chen1,3 erg 1 Department of Physics, State Key Laboratory of Surface Physics and Laboratory of Advanced Materials, Alexander Wietek,* Antoine Sterdyniak, and Andreas M. Läuchli ) Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, China Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Innsbruck, A-6020 Innsbruck, Austria Hu (2 eis (2 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Northridge, California 91330, USA (Received 16 April 2015; revised manuscript received 28 August 2015; published 14 September 2015) nb 3 Department of Physics and Center of Theoretical and Computational Physics, SU The University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam Road, Hong Kong, China (Received 10 January 2014; revised manuscript received 20 February 2014; published 4 April 2014) We investigate the stability and the nature of the chiral spin liquids which were recently uncovered in exte e CSL Kalmeyer-Laughlin (KL) chiral spin liquid (CSL) is a type of quantum spin liquid without time-reversal Heisenberg models on the kagome lattice. Using a Gutzwiller projected wave function approach, i.e., a pa symmetry, and it is considered as the parent state of an exotic type of superconductor—anyon PHYSICAL REVIEW X 10, 021042 (2020) superconductor. Such an exotic state has been sought for more than twenty years; however, it remains construction, we obtain large overlaps with ground states of these extended Heisenberg models. We fu H unclear whether it can exist in a realistic system where time-reversal symmetry is breaking (T breaking) suggest FIG. 1. (Color online) Sketch of thethat kagomethe lattice appearance and of the different interaction terms of the Hamiltonian (1). Heisenberg of the chiral spin liquid in the time-reversal invariant case is linked to a clas spontaneously. By using the density matrix renormalization group, we show that KL CSL existsinteractions in a between first, second, and third nearest neighbors are frustrated anisotropic kagome Heisenberg model, which has spontaneous T breaking. We find thatconsidered. our transition line between The third nearest neighbor Heisenberg interactions are two FIG. 2. (Color online) Excitation spectra from exact diagonal- ization.magnetically Different symbols and colorsordered correspondphases. to different Chiral Spin Liquid Phase of the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model: ) momentum/point-group symmetry sectors. We use the cluster ge- rd only considered across the hexagons. Three-spin scalar chirality model has two topological degenerate ground states, which exhibit nonvanishing scalar chirality orderinteractions and and breaking time-reversal and parity symmetries, are ometries and notation explained in Ref. [28]. (a) Effect of the J term χ areQuantum protected by Spin Liquid gap. finite excitation with Emergent Furthermore, Chiralthis we identify Order state asin KLthe CSLTriangular-lattice also considered by the characteristic Hubbard DOI: on gray Model 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125122 shaded triangles. A on the spectrum on the 30-siteDensity Matrix cluster. The fourfold degeneracy ofRenormalization PACS the ground state is lifted to a twofold degeneracy which corresponds to Group Study number(s): 75.10.Kt, 05.30.Pr, 75.10.Jm, 75.40 ba SU one sign of the scalar chirality. (b) Scan across the classical transition edge conformal field theory from the entanglement spectrum and the quasiparticles braiding statistics 1,2,3,* cluster. The fourfold degeneracy 1,2 1,2,4 1,2 Bin-Bin Chen, 1, 2 Ziyu Chen, 1 Shou-Shu Gong, 1, ⇤ D. N. Sheng, 3 Wei extracted from the modular matrix. We also study how this CSL phase evolves as the system approaches the Li,1, 4, † and Andreas breaking Weichselbaum was discovered for J 5, 2, ‡ χ = 0 and 0.2 ! (J 2 = J 3 )/ of Aaron the CSL is Szasz line for Jχ = 0 on the 36b sites only present ,close to J Johannes 2 = J 3 (yellow Motruk, shading). (c) Michael P. Zaletel, and Joel E. Moore 1 for J = J = 0.4, J = 0, and various system sizes Department of χPhysics, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA b J1 ! 0.7. Here the ground state degeneracy is four, which can Energy spectra nearest-neighbor kagome Heisenberg 1 model. School of Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China be understood as arising from two copies of opposite chirality 2 Ns and geometries. Turquoise rectangle: (0,0) [#] momentum, even questions arise: (i) Are the two chiral sp I. INTRODUCTION 2 3 2 Arnold Sommerfeld Center for Theoretical Physics, Center for NanoScience, of a twofold degenerate ν = 1/2 Laughlin state. Unlike several Materials Sciences under 180◦ rotation. Blue Division, up triangle: (0,π Lawrence ) [M] momentum, Berkeley odd National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.137202 and Munich Center PACS fornumbers: Quantum 75.10.Kt, Science05.30.Pr, 75.10.Jm, 75.40.Mg and Technology, topological phases such as Toric code [45] and double-semion ◦3 Perimeter under 180 rotation. Red down Institute triangle: for (0,0)Theoretical distinct or are they related? (ii) Is there a [#] momentum, Physics, Waterloo, Ontario N2L 2Y5, Canada Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 80333 Munich, Germany The[46] quest for quantum spin liquidsDepartment phases that also have a fourfold ground state degeneracy, [1] is ofcurrently 4 rotation, odd under reflection. even under 180 ◦ Physics, Princeton a University, Princeton, New Jersey 08540, USA we will show that in this case time-reversal symmetry is (lattice-based) picture or a variational wa 3 Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Northridge, very active endeavour in (Received California 91330, spontaneously broken.USA condensed 8analogy August matter 2019; effect revised physics. manuscript This magnetic received field on the 4 describes December 2019;the accepted 18 March 2020; published(iii) 22 May 20 An SU 4(4) chiral spin liquid and quantized dipole Hall effect in moiré bilayers Topological order, an exoticInternational state of Research matter Institute that hostsof Multidisciplinary KL state Science, may exist Beihangin University, magnetic Beijingfrustrated 100191, China systems to the of a longitudinal chiral spin liquid? Wh elusive state of quantum matter comes phase, inexperimental variousstudies forms ) 5 two degenerate ground states in a ferromagnetic Ising model Department of Condensed Matter Physics and Materials Science, III. ENERGY SPECTROSCOPY that have d’être” fractionalized quasiparticles with anyonic braiding sta- through spontaneously breaking time-reversal symmetry of these chiralspinspin liquids, phase in i.e., w 4 in the ordered by Motivated where the magnetic field immediately found signatures of a quantum liquid Ya-Hui Brookhaven tistics, is one of the core topics in modern condensed- Zhang , National 1 D. N. Sheng Laboratory, , and Upton, 2 Ashvin New York [12,17], which are among the most Vishwanath 11973-5000,and USA 1 is theoretically difficult To investigate systems the we studiedintensely persistence limit,for of the model for J2 =studied, this chiral spin liquid at the selects however one of the two ordered wasstates. difficult As we show later based ( J3 = organic crystals whose structure is well by Jχdescribed by the two-dimensional triangular lattice, we study the and using theliquids spin stabilized for the two reported H thermodynamical on overlaps, the chiral spin liquid thus selected is of the (Dated: February 11, 2021) SU matter physics [1]. A quantum spin liquid (QSL) [2] is a theorists to study exactly. toUSApin down system sizesin computational studies ofto therealistic TRS symmetric quantum 0.4 and Jχ = 0 up to 42 sites. The low-energy spectra for Hubbard same typemodel as the oneon stabilized this in the J1 -Jat lattice χ model half alone, filling infinite-system density matrix renormalization method. On infinite cylinders withwe come up with someanguiding principle wh 1 Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, thattoMA, and different are shown in Fig. 2(c). While the energy is connected situation in the absence b 2021 prominent example of topological The interplay order, whichspin between frustration andIn is thought this charge Letter, fluctuationwe showrise gives the KL state an exotic quantumis the ground state in the splitting between the four ground states has a nonmonotonous group of Jχ(iDMRG) finite circumference, we identify intermediate phase to exist in some frustrated magnets [3]. Among intermediate-interaction regime various state of of the half-filled a frustrated anisotropic triangular-lattice Hubbard (TLU) spin kagomemodel, Hamiltonians Heisenberg whilethethe model nature of and the fourhard to states characterize . unambiguously in interaction the J2 = J3 condition (in the absence of Jχ ) by fixing to stabilize CSLs on other lattices? In the f behavior, energy gap between lowest energy In Fig. 2(b) we investigate the effect of a deviation from 2 Department of Physics and Astronomy, California State University, Northridge,and theCA 91330 fifth one increases with the system size. Moreover, the between observed metallic behavior at low strength and Mott insulating spin-ordered behavior types of QSL [3–11], the therestateisis aunder classdebate. Using the density (KHM) of time-reversal matrix renormalization by using group with the density matrix experiments SU(2) spin ⌦U(1) renormalization ratio ofcharge the energy on symmetries group quantum splitting to the energy gapmagnets. decreases with at strong J2 = 0.5interactions. and varying J3 .Chiral ordering One observes that from spontaneous breaking of time-reversal symmetry, a fractionally the fourfold ground state degeneracy is rapidly lifted when J3 deviates address each of these questions. In short, we implemented, we spin studyliquid the TLU (Dated: model defined March on the 19, long 2021) cylinder geometry symmetry violating QSL called chiral (CSL) (DMRG) [30], a numerical methodwith which circumference The thehas realized Sbeen system = at the Wtends proven size; this 1/2 = to4.indicate that this phase is indeed quantized thermodynamical Heisenberg antiferromagnet limit. It is also important to spin Hallon more than about 0.05–0.1 the response, from 0.5.kagome and characteristic level statistics in the entanglement spectrum in the Interestingly the line [12–14]. A CSL shares some A gapped Motivated quantum similar by the spin liquid, recent proposal properties with on-site with theof realizinginteraction powerful an SU(4)9 . U/t . 10.75, is identified Hubbardquasi-one-dimensional in solving model on triangular between moiré notice that the metallic super- sectors involved in the fourfold 0 < J = J < 1 is the classical transition line between a frustrated the momentum
You can also read