Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet - CA.gov

Page created by Jeffery Ross
 
CONTINUE READING
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet
DF-46 (REV 09/19)

Budget Change Proposal - Cover Sheet
Fiscal Year: 2020-2021
Business Unit: 1750
Department: California Horse Racing Board
Priority Number: 1
Budget Request Name: 1750-001-BCP-2020-GB
Program: 1610 - California Horse Racing Board
Subprogram: n/a

Budget Request Description: Horse Racing Safety Panel

Budget Request Summary:
The California Horse Racing Board is requesting $1,334,000 Horse Racing Fund in
2020-2021 and ongoing, to implement additional safety procedures at all California
tracks with an additional 6.0 Official Veterinarians; 3.0 Stewards; and 3.0 Investigator
positions.

Requires Legislation: ☐ Yes ☒ No

Code Section(s) to be Added/Amended/Repealed: n/a

Does this BCP contain information technology (IT) components? ☐ Yes ☒ No
If yes, departmental Chief Information Officer must sign.
Department CIO Name: n/a
Department CIO Signature: n/a
Signed On Date: n/a
For IT requests, specify the project number, the most recent project approval document
(FSR, SPR, S1BA, S2AA, S3SD, S4PRA), and the approval date.
Project Number: n/a
Project Approval Document: n/a
Approval Date: n/a

If proposal affects another department, does other department concur with proposal?
☐ Yes ☐ No
Attach comments of affected department, signed and dated by the department director
or designee.
Prepared By: .
Date: .
Reviewed By: Susan Bitcon
Date: January 10, 2020
Department Director: Rick Baedeker
Date: January 10, 2020
Agency Secretary: Alexis Podesta
Date: January 10, 2020

Department of Finance Use Only

Additional Reviews: Capital Outlay:☐   ITCU:☐         FSCU:☐      OSAE:☐
       Department of Technology:☐
PPBA: Kimberly Harbison
Date submitted to the Legislature: January 10, 2020
A.    Budget Request Summary
The California Horse Racing Board (CHRB) is requesting $1,334,000 Horse Racing
Fund in 2020-2021 and ongoing, to implement safety panels at all California tracks with
an additional 6.0 Official Veterinarians; 3.0 Stewards; and 3.0 CHRB Investigator
positions. Following the loss of 30 racehorses to injury during the 2019 Santa Anita
meet, Governor Newsom directed the CHRB to implement a review panel to scrutinize
the fitness of all horses entered to race. In response, a panel of five CHRB experts,
comprised of veterinarians and Stewards, was assigned to conduct a daily review of all
horses entered to race. The process added four to six hours each race day to the job
descriptions of the assigned personnel, significantly compromising their ability to
perform their other duties. The additional resources will allow the Board to continue this
important, new safety procedure, with panels at all California tracks.

B.    Background/History
Racehorse Fatalities

The number of equine fatalities resulting from racing and training injuries at facilities
regulated by CHRB historically exceeded 200 annually in the early 2000s. Regulations
adopted by the CHRB, along with policies and resources provided by the CHRB and
California racetracks, helped reduce that number to 114 in Fiscal Year (FY) 2017-18
(results for FY 18-19 are provided by the Maddy Lab at UC Davis and are anticipated to
be released in January 2020).

However, the 2019 winter-spring race meeting at Santa Anita Park was a stark reminder
that considerable work is necessary to protect racehorses in California. Thirty horses
died from racing and training injuries during the Santa Anita race meeting that ran from
December 26, 2018, through June 23, 2019. Because most of these deaths occurred in
an unprecedented cluster – 18 during a six-week period in January and
February – these fatalities caught the attention of the news media, animal rights
advocates, and the public, particularly, following the death on February 23, 2019 of the
popular Breeders’ Cup-winning horse Battle of Midway. Prior to the 2019 winter-spring
race meeting, however, the general public paid little attention to racehorse fatalities at
Santa Anita and in the state. But the fatalities at Santa Anita made headlines and
became the topic of conversations not only in California but throughout the world.

In response, CHRB, in consultation with the Business, Consumer Services, and
Housing Agency, created a review Panel to evaluate medical, training, and racing
histories of horses entered to compete at Santa Anita and to scratch (disallow) those
horses that did not appear fit to run. As a result, the Panel is currently supervising
safety at the daytime thoroughbred meeting in southern California. It is comprised of
five individuals that are uniquely qualified with many years of experience within the
industry. Each Panel member has a high degree of knowledge about racehorse fitness,
in addition to decades of experience within the horse racing industry. The current Panel
consists of two Official Veterinarians and three CHRB stewards, all independent
contractors of CHRB as stipulated by statute. They evaluate each horse’s past
performance and medical history to determine its fitness to race. The Panel
veterinarians also perform physical examinations of horses identified as “at risk.” Risk
factors include veterinary history, training patterns, and questionable drops in the level
of competition.

The review Panel rejected 38 horses from the final nine racing programs at the Santa
Anita race meeting and continues to review all entries for thoroughbred racing in the
south at Del Mar, Santa Anita, and Los Alamitos race tracks. But, this only represents a
portion of the racing calendar in the state. At present, there are no Panels operating
during night racing in the south, nor day or night racing in the north, including Golden
Gate Fields, the five racing fairs, and harness racing at Cal Expo. CHRB simply lacks
the necessary personnel to do the work. The resulting lack of scrutiny on these
races – which comprise most of the annual calendar – is inconsistent given the CHRB’s
obligation to protect all racehorses and threatens the viability of an industry that
produces thousands of jobs and contributes important economic input to the state.

Contributing Factors

Racing Surfaces: Santa Anita offers two types of racing surfaces, dirt and grass (turf
races). Most of the focus concentrated on the main dirt track at Santa Anita because
23 of the fatalities resulted from racing and training on the main track surface.

Six other fatalities occurred on the grass (turf races) and one on the training track. The
main track is a dirt mixture of materials that form a cushion of about six inches on top of
a hard base. A full-time crew maintains the surface, however inclement weather
interferes with the maintenance process. By one count, Santa Anita received 27 inches
of rain during the first two months of the 2019 winter-spring race meeting.

On non-racing days, when given advance warning of approaching storms, the track
maintenance crew is able to “seal” the track, i.e., the crew rolls heavy equipment over
the main track to form a hard surface, so the water will roll off and not penetrate the soil.
Optimally, the rain passes, and the crew harrows the surface, breaking the seal and
making it gentler on the horses for racing. However, re-opening a sealed track does not
immediately restore it to its normal condition. The process takes days, and the surface
is different on each of those days. The constantly changing surface at Santa Anita
made racing and training more difficult for the horses. Worse, there were fears that the
soil was uneven with varying depth and moisture content throughout the track oval
(though CHRB inspections were unable to confirm this). Eventually the Stronach
Group, which owns and is licensed to operate Santa Anita, was forced to halt racing and
training for nearly three weeks in March to remove the cushion, inspect the base to
make certain it was dry and even, and then restore the cushion to its original, level
state. Morning exercises continued on the adjacent training track, which to that date
had not experienced a fatality. The region in and around Santa Anita experienced
mostly good weather for the balance of the race meeting. The race meeting ran for
nearly seven weeks without a fatality after that major renovation, easing some concerns
that the racing surface was a problem.

Turf racing typically does not take place during inclement weather, so the two grass
courses – the interior track oval and the course coming down from the hill along Baldwin
Avenue – were more lightly used than the main track. However, six of the fatalities
occurred on the grass, and three occurred in a one-week period off the hillside course.
This eventually prompted management to cancel the popular 6 ½-furlong turf races off
the hillside out of caution.

Condition of Racehorses: CHRB Rule 1846.5, Postmortem Examination, requires a
postmortem examination (necropsy) for every horse that suffers a fatal injury on the
racetrack in training or in competition, or that dies or is euthanized within an area under
the jurisdiction of CHRB. In 1990 the CHRB and University of California, Davis
established the postmortem program, a partnership between CHRB and the California
Animal Health and Food Safety (CAHFS) laboratory system operated under the School
of Veterinary Medicine at U.C. Davis. Necropsies were performed to determine the
nature of the injuries and develop strategies to improve the health, safety, and welfare
of horses. Over the ensuing years the program has examined more than 7,000 horses.
Among the conclusions reached is the fact that more than 80 percent of fatalities are the
result of musculoskeletal injuries. These pre-existing injuries, however, are usually
microscopic or hairline fractures that are undetectable without sophisticated imaging
diagnostics. Horses with such undetected injuries are subsequently at risk during
high-velocity training and racing.

This vulnerability places horses at risk under the best of circumstances, but racing and
training under track conditions experienced during the 2019 winter-spring months at
Santa Anita increased that risk. Most of the fatalities experienced early in the race
meeting were due to fetlock joint injuries, strongly suggesting a combination of factors
relating to health and training regimens and surface changes.

Four fatalities that occurred later in the race meeting, after the major renovation and
during fair weather, were of a different nature, i.e., pelvis and humeral fractures, which
were less indicative of any problem with the racing surface and more indicative of
pre-existing conditions.

Mitigating Measures

Steps taken during the meet to mitigate problems and safeguard horses: The mission of
the CHRB is to ensure the integrity, viability, and safety of the California horse racing
industry by regulating pari-mutuel wagering for the protection of the public, promoting
horse racing, breeding, and wagering opportunities, and fostering safe racing through
the development and enforcement of track safety standards and regulations for the
health and welfare of all participants.

The first priority in addressing the cluster of fatalities was to verify the main track was
safe for racing. The Stronach Group (TSG), the track’s management, rehired Dennis
Moore, the former track superintendent, for this purpose, and in addition brought in
Dr. Mick Peterson, a world-renowned expert in the field of track management. They
oversaw the renovation of the main track during the March 2019 hiatus. Mr. Moore
remained on the job to make certain that daily track conditions met safety standards.
Santa Anita operated for nearly seven weeks after this renovation without a fatality,
strong evidence the racing surface was safe for racing and training.

During the renovation period, TSG, owners of Santa Anita, announced several new
safety and welfare measures that would be put in place when racing resumed on
March 28, 2019 at Santa Anita, prior to the formation of the Panel. Key measures
included:
• Requiring trainers to apply for permission to work (high-speed exercise) a horse at
least 24 hours in advance, allowing track veterinarians to evaluate potential workers.
TSG hired three additional veterinarians for this purpose. It should be noted that 13 of
the fatalities occurred during morning training, prompting increased scrutiny of training
activities.
• Prohibiting all horses other than those performing higher-speed, timed workouts from
being on the racetrack during the first 15 minutes after the opening of the main track for
training early in the morning and following renovation breaks, allowing horses going at a
faster pace to encounter less traffic and thus increasing safety. Horses going out for
simpler routine gallops were allowed onto the track after 15 minutes.
• The creation by TSG of a new position, Director of Equine Welfare, responsible for the
oversight of all aspects of equine wellbeing, including supervision of a new rapid
response team for injuries. The well-respected equine veterinarian Dr. Dionne Benson
was hired to fill the position.
• The transfer of veterinary records to new owners and trainers, providing transparency
for medical histories.
• The prohibition of corticosteroid intra-articular treatments (injections) within 14 days of
racing.
• Maximum dosage of furosemide (Lasix) used for the control of internal bleeding cut in
half to 250 mg.
• All horses that work subject to post-work blood testing, subject to the same
corticosteroid and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) restrictions as races.

Some of the safety initiatives required CHRB approval. The CHRB granted approval of
those measures to be implemented at Santa Anita and Golden Gate Fields, the two
racetracks owned by TSG, at its March 28, 2019 meeting. At the CHRB’s April 18, 2019
regular meeting, the Board imposed the same medication restrictions at all California
racetracks. The Board also eliminated the previously permitted thresholds, or zero
tolerance, for corticosteroids and NSAIDs in post-race tests.
Shortly thereafter, TSG announced the purchase and development of nuclear diagnostic
imaging equipment (PET-Scan), so that previously un-diagnosable fractures might be
detected, allowing veterinarians to recommend that certain horses be given time off to
heal their injuries. This equipment is expected to be installed in the stable area of Santa
Anita in 2020.

As previously stated, CHRB created a review Panel to evaluate medical, training, and
racing histories of horses entered to compete at Santa Anita and to scratch (disallow)
those horses that did not appear fit to run. The Panel’s impact on the reduction of
fatalities since its inception is clear. But the five Panel participants are working
extremely long hours, as Panel participation is a new and added responsibility. And this
unanticipated, additional work comes at the expense of the day-to-day responsibilities
they were contracted to perform. Approximately 50 percent of their time is dedicated to
this new task, which must be performed for each day of racing.

Official Veterinarians

Pursuant to Business and Professions Code (BPC) section 19518, the CHRB shall
contract with persons to perform the duties of Official Veterinarians. Currently, CHRB
assigns one Official Veterinarian for each live race meeting, which would not be
adequate to properly examine all horses entered to race. Typical pre-race evaluations
can take up to four hours per day. This is in addition to the Official Veterinarian’s daily
responsibilities as stipulated in CHRB Rule 1560:

“The official veterinarian shall be responsible to the stewards for the conduct of horses
and their attendants in the receiving and detention barn. He shall have authority and
jurisdiction to supervise the practicing licensed veterinarians and shall enforce the
Board's rules and regulations relating to veterinary practices. The official veterinarian
shall recommend discipline for the licensed veterinarians who fail to comply with the
rules and regulations and accepted veterinary practices. He shall report to the Board
the names of all horses humanely destroyed or which otherwise expire at the meeting
and the reasons therefor. He shall maintain a list of all infirm horses on the grounds.
No official veterinarian, during his term of appointment, shall directly treat or prescribe
for any horse registered to race at any recognized meeting except in emergency, the
details of which shall be immediately reported to the stewards.”

It is the Official Veterinarian’s responsibility to oversee all medication testing
procedures. The 2018-2019 statistics are anticipated to be released by the Maddy Lab
in January 2020; however, more than 5,300 races with 38,079 starters were run at
California tracks during 2017-2018. From those participants, 20,580 urine and blood
samples were taken within chain-of-custody requirements and submitted to the Maddy
Lab for testing. And, pre-race, out-of-competition, evidence, and other testing resulted
in 56,151 samples being analyzed by the Maddy Lab. (See Attachment A displaying
estimated horse populations and licensed race meeting dates.)
Official Veterinarians supervise all veterinary phases of racing operations at the horse
racing meeting in a manner consistent with the Horse Racing Law, directives, the rules
and regulations of the California Horse Racing Board, and standards in the horse racing
industry. The Contractor, i.e., the Steward or Veterinarian, shall be responsible to
perform Out-of-Competition Testing, and, among other things:

• Enforce the rules of racing in connection with veterinary practices.
• Supervise all licensees and persons attendant upon horses.
• Supervise, and, if necessary, report to the Board of Stewards, any unlicensed person
who commits a racing offense.
• Participate in administrative hearings, as necessary, to assist in fact finding.
• Monitor compliance with race day medications.
• Report to the Board of Stewards the need to disqualify ineligible horses.
• Act as a liaison between horsemen, track veterinarians, the Equine Medical Director,
and the Board of Stewards.
• Report violations involving inappropriate or illegal use of medication, such as
permitted and prohibited drugs that may affect performance.
• Assist the Equine Medical Director as needed.
• Report significant issues to the Board as they relate to the race meeting.
• Take any and all actions reasonably necessary to effectively supervise all phases of
racing veterinary operations at a racing meeting in a manner consistent with applicable
horse racing laws.
• Monitor compliance for race day medication regulations.
• Observe medication administration.
• Follow-up on leads that may involve the inappropriate or illegal use of medication
such as permitted and prohibited drugs that may affect racing performance.
• Report fatalities and accidents at training centers and racetracks and assist in fatality
investigations as directed by the Executive Director or Equine Medical Director.
• Maintain records of injuries, fatalities, and accidents and assist in the racing safety
program as directed by the Equine Medical Director.
• Maintain records of pre-race examinations and examinations of horses on the
Veterinarian’s List as directed by the Equine Medical Director.
• Procure biological samples as directed by the Equine Medical Director, Board of
Stewards or Executive Director.
• Make recommendations to the CHRB to ensure the integrity of racing and compliance
with the horse racing laws and regulations.
• The Official Veterinarian will conduct microchip implantations for the CHRB at those
California racetracks where the CHRB is implementing a microchipping program.
• The Official Veterinarian will conduct microchip implantation orientation, training, and
progress review sessions with licensed veterinarians and registered technicians.

Continuing the Panel with existing veterinarian personnel is unsustainable.

CHRB Official Veterinarians are contracted at $551 per day. The number of days
worked varies according to each track and varies from two to four race days per week,
with additional days assigned by the Equine Medical Director. Panel work is performed
on the day that entries are drawn or the following day.

Stewards

CHRB Rule 1527, General Authority of Stewards, states: the stewards have general
authority and supervision over all licensees and other person’s attendant on horses, and
also over the enclosures of any recognized meeting. The stewards are strictly
responsible to the Board for the conduct of the race meeting in every particular.

Note: While veterinarians can recommend that a horse be scratched (withdrawn) from a
race, only the Stewards have the authority to do so. Therefore, it is imperative that at
least one Steward participate as a member of the panel.

The CHRB and its Stewards are tasked with enforcing laws and regulations pertaining
to all aspects of horse racing in California, including the running of a race, the training
and stabling of horses, veterinary medical practices related to racehorses, and testing
racehorses for prohibited medications. The CHRB also issues occupational licenses to
individuals working in various occupations at the racetrack and oversees their general
conduct. California’s wagering public can wager on California races, as well as races
imported from other states and other countries. Likewise, the wagering public located
outside of California can wager on California races. The public can place wagers at
licensed racetracks, simulcast wagering facilities, and online in California.

The CHRB has the authority to regulate legalized horse racing activities in the state as
granted by Business and Professions Code, Chapter 4, Division 8. The CHRB mission
is to ensure the integrity, viability, and safety of the California horse racing industry by
regulating pari-mutuel wagering, promoting horse racing, breeding, and wagering
opportunities, and fostering safe racing through the development and enforcement of
track safety standards and regulations for the health and welfare of all participants.

BPC and horse racing rules and regulation sections delineate the authority of Stewards
who serve as racing officials, exercising general authority and supervision over
licensees and other persons attendant on horses, and over the racing enclosure of any
recognized race meeting. Stewards exercise a high level of responsibility during a race
meeting. BPC and Rules referencing authority and responsibility of Stewards are
included in the following BPC sections:

19420 – Jurisdiction and Supervision over race meeting
19427 – Authority to the CHRB to carry out the responsibility of the horse racing law
19435 – Authority to subpoena for witness attendance or production of records
19437 – Authority to punish for false testimony
19940 – CHRB powers to effectively carryout the purposes of the horse racing law
California Code of Regulations:
1528 Jurisdiction of Stewards to Suspend or Fine
1529 Referral to the Board
1532 Payment of Fines
1537 Record and Transcript of Hearing
1541 Power to Order Examination of Horse
1542 Power to Refuse Entry and Deny Eligibility
1544 Calling off Race
1546 Complaints Against Officials
1548 Rulings to the Stewards
1549 Recommendation of Discipline
1592 Ineligible Horse to Be Disqualified
1626 Refund of Fees

Pursuant to BPC section 19518, the Board shall contract with persons licensed as
stewards, who shall supervise all phases of racing operations at the horse racing
meeting in a manner consistent with the Horse Racing Law, directives, and the rules
and regulations of the CHRB. Stewards shall be responsible for the following activities
during a race meeting:

• Enforce and abide by the rules of racing in connection with all participants.
• Supervise licensees and persons attendant upon horses and, if necessary, discipline
them for misconduct.
• Supervise, and, if necessary, bar from participation any unlicensed person who
commits a racing offense.
• Hold administrative hearings to conduct fact-finding, and issue rulings, statements of
decision, and proposed decisions.
• Control entries and declarations in connection with all races.
• Disqualify ineligible horses.
• Approve the transfer of race horses.
• Approve changes to trainers, jockeys, drivers, or equipment.
• Supervise drawing of post positions.
• Determine the order of finish of a race with authority to disqualify a horse, jockey, or
driver as appropriate for violation of racing rules.
• Confirm the official order of finish for pari-mutuel wagering.
• Close pari-mutuel wagering in each race.
• Review with jockeys or drivers the races of the previous day or night.
• Interview certain license applicants and make recommendations to the Board.
• Maintain official minutes of the conduct of each racing meeting.
• Report significant issues to the Board as they relate to the race meeting.
• Take any and all actions reasonably necessary to effectively supervise all phases of
racing operations at a racing meeting in a manner consistent with applicable horse
racing laws.
• Analyze complaints and investigative files, and assist in case presentation, as
needed.
Responsibilities of Safety Stewards

Safety Stewards not serving in the stand do not have authority over licensees nor are
they responsible for the conduct of the race meet. Rather, their primary responsibility is
the welfare and safety of the horse and jockey, as well as those who work around the
horses. Among other duties, they also gather information associated with drug testing
and medication programs at California racetracks, and shall be responsible to:

• Monitor and observe daily habits and practices of backside activities.
• Monitor compliance for race day medication regulations.
• Observe medication administration.
• Follow-up on leads that may involve the inappropriate or illegal use of medication,
such as permitted and prohibited drugs that may affect racing performance.
• Investigate fatalities and accidents at training centers and racetracks.
• Conduct pre-meet racetrack safety inspections independently or with CHRB
enforcement personnel.
• Participate in resolution of financial complaints.
• Make recommendations to CHRB to ensure the integrity of racing and compliance
with horse racing laws and regulations.
• Provide liaison between the stewards and CHRB Enforcement staff.
• Enforce compliance with safety standards; perform compliance inspections and report
the findings to CHRB.

As previously noted, a review Panel has been formed to evaluate medical, training, and
racing histories of horses entered to compete at Santa Anita and to scratch (disallow)
those horses that did not appear fit to run. Members of the Panel required the
participation of the Chief Steward and a Safety Steward, assigned with equine
veterinarians whose responsibility it is to review and evaluate horse past performance
statistics; horse work out records, and horse veterinary history. If the Panel determines
a horse to be at high risk, the horse is removed from the racing program. Stewards
have the authority to “scratch” a horse from the racing program.

The 2019 winter-spring race meeting at Santa Anita Park Race Track required
considerable work on the part of Panel members to aid in the protection of racehorses
and reduction of fatalities. Because most of the equine deaths at Santa Anita occurred
in rapid succession, the fatalities caught the attention of the news media, animal rights
advocates, and the public. The fatalities at Santa Anita made headlines and became
the topic of conversations not only in California but throughout the world.

It is imperative that the work of the Panel continues and is expanded to cover all
racehorses at all tracks in the state. This budget change proposal request addresses
the costs required to fund three additional steward contractors dedicated to the Panel,
with the following workload description:
Duties of the Panel Stewards

1. Obtain horse race day entries for the day.
2. Obtain a copy of past performance records for horses that are entered in the race.
3. Review horse racing history.
4. Review horse work out history.
5. Review the listed trainer of the horse and note any changes in who is or has recently
trained the horse.
6. Review any rider changes from the horse’s last start.
7. Review any changes in the classification of the type of race the horse has raced in.
For instance, is the horse suddenly racing in easier races with less expensive horses?
8. Review and discuss the veterinary history of each horse.
9. Discuss with the Panel any horse that is a high risk, and make a determination
whether the entry is denied, scratched, or the horse is placed on a list for further
examination.
10. Disseminate information to make sure the entry is denied or scratched.

The review Panel currently consists of five individuals who are uniquely qualified with
many years of experience within the industry. Each Panel member has a high degree
of knowledge about a racehorse in addition to decades of experience within the horse
racing industry. The current Panel consist of two equine veterinarians and three
California Horse Racing Board stewards. Pursuant to regulation, stewards are
appointed by the CHRB, exercising responsibility for the conduct of the race meeting.
Each day that entries are taken for race day programs the Panel meets and reviews the
horses that are entered to race.

CHRB Investigators

A fundamental necessity of the CHRB’s staffing operations is the department’s
Enforcement Division, which is tasked with enforcing laws, rules, regulations, and
policies governing horse racing in California. The department adopts regulations to
protect the public and to provide for the safety of both the equine and human
participants.

In March 2019, after an unusually high cluster of equine fatalities at Santa Anita Park,
the CHRB formed new investigative teams to conduct in-depth investigations into the
fatalities. The investigative teams were made up of a CHRB Investigator, an Official
Veterinarian, and a Safety Steward. At the onset of the investigations, 23 fatality
investigative cases were opened. The CHRB Investigator on the fatality review team
was tasked with compiling documents, gathering facts, documenting the investigation
details, coordinating interviews, and writing a final investigative report. The scope of
these fatality investigations was to determine if any horse racing rules or California
criminal laws were violated.

These equine fatality investigations were not a component of the CHRB enforcement
division’s workload prior to this point. Therefore, these complex and high-profile
investigations were essentially new duties not accounted for in any measurable extent
in the average yearly workload prior to that point.

As the in-depth fatality investigations progressed, 7 more horse fatalities occurred at
Santa Anita Park and 18 horse fatalities occurred at other California tracks/facilities.
These additional cases were assigned to the various CHRB investigative teams,
bringing the total individual fatality investigations to 48. These additional cases were
generated in the first six months of 2019. The high volume and complexity of these new
investigative duties caused other workload to be delayed or not be completed.

The CHRB Enforcement Division currently consists of the following peace officer
positions:
• 1.0 – Chief of Enforcement
• 3.0 – Supervising Special Investigators
• 10.0 – Investigators

Enforcement staff Investigators are assigned throughout the State at four primary horse
racing tracks: Santa Anita Park, Los Alamitos Race Course, Golden Gate Fields, and
the California Exposition and State Fair.

Current Investigator staffing breakdown by race track location is shown below:

    Race Track Location                                Current Investigator Staff

    Santa Anita Park (Arcadia, CA)                                                3.0
    Los Alamitos Race Course (Cypress, CA)                                        2.0
    California Exposition/State Fair (Sacramento,                                 2.0
    CA)
    Golden Gate Fields (Albany, CA)                                               3.0

Resource History

Dollars in thousands
  Program Budget             2014-15      2015-16     2016-17       2017-18 2018-19
  Authorized Expenditures       12,108      13,432      13,300       13,542  13,807
  Actual Expenditures           11,711      13,183      12,975       13,542 *13,047
  Revenues                      11,912      13,268      13,479       13,805 *14,245
  Authorized Positions            57.0        49.4          49.4        47.2   47.2
  Filled Positions                49.0        50.4          50.5        47.2   44.9
  Vacancies                         8.0        -1.0        -1.10           0     2.3
*Represents estimates only – fiscal year end data reconciliation in progress
Workload History

       Workload Measure           2014-15   2015-16   2016-17   2017-18   2018-19   2019-20
Hours writing investigative
                                   160       160       160       160       160       160
reports (average 94 reports)
Hours to perform barn
                                   120       120       120       120       120       120
inspections
Hours to gather and review
                                   110       110       110       110       110       110
investigative documents
Hours interviewing witnesses       110       110       110       110       110       110
Hours to monitor equines,
backstretch workers, facilities    100       100       100       100       100       100
and equipment
Hours investigating applicant's
                                   100       100       100       100       100       100
fitness for license
Hours to review voice mail/e-
                                    95        95        95        95        95        95
mail complaints/issues
Hours to document and
                                    91        91        91        91        91        91
process evidence seized
Hours discussing cases with
Equine Medical Director/track       90        90        90        90        90        90
Veterinarian
Hours for walk-in
                                    90        90        90        90        90        90
issues/complaints
Hours for internal/external
                                    90        90        90        90        90        90
facility inspection
Hours to conduct breath/urine
                                    85        85        85        85        85        85
licensee testing
Hours to open
investigation/review                80        80        80        80        80        80
preliminary documents
Hours to work with track
                                    80        80        80        80        80        80
security staff
Hours to present cases at a
                                    80        80        80        80        80        80
Hearing
Hours reviewing licensee
                                    80        80        80        80        80        80
history/actions
Hours evaluating licensee
                                    70        70        70        70        70        70
criminal histories
Hours to work with track
                                    65        65        65        65        65        65
staff/management
Hours assisting with Financial
                                    60        60        60        60        60        60
Complaints
Hours for Hearing case
                                    60        60        60        60        60        60
preparation
Hours to discuss case with
                                    60        60        60        60        60        60
complainant
Workload Measure          2014-15     2015-16    2016-17    2017-18     2018-19    2019-20
Hours tracking criminal case
status/ordering court               60          60         60         60          60         60
documents
Hours travel to facilities
                                    40          40         40         40          40         40
statewide
Hours for off-track/auxiliary
                                    35          35         35         35          35         35
facility inspection
Hours monitoring paddock
                                    30          30         30         30          30         30
area/jockey room
Hours in Training                   24          24         24         24          24         24
Hours with law enforcement,
animal control, health              15          15         15         15          15         15
department
Total Hours                        2,080      2,080      2,080       2,080      2,080       2,080
    C.     State Level Considerations
    The proposed augmentation contained in the BCP does not affect other state
    departments. The request for additional contracted services and staffing does not
    negatively impact state operations.

    D.     Justification
    OFFICIAL VETERINARIAN - The events of the 2019 winter-spring race meeting at
    Santa Anita Park were a stark reminder that considerable work is necessary to protect
    racehorses in California.

    In response to the fatalities experienced during the December 26, 2018 through June
    23, 2019 winter –spring race meeting at Santa Anita, Governor Gavin Newsom, ordered
    CHRB to create a review Panel to evaluate medical, training and racing histories of
    horses entered to compete at Santa Anita and to scratch (disallow) those horses that
    did not appear fit to run. The CHRB in response reprioritized the responsibilities of
    Official Veterinarians and Steward to serve on the Panel. The Panel is composed of the
    Equine Medical Director, Official Veterinarians, and Chief Steward along with two other
    stewards.

    Time devoted to the Panel, in addition to the Panel participants other responsibilities are
    a minimum of four hours each day that entries were taken to reviewing all aspects of
    each horse’s history, including any medical information available to them, notes from
    previous interactions with those horses, racing and training records, and other variables.
    Furthermore, after identifying an average of 20 horses in each set of entries requiring
    further evaluation, the Official Veterinarian on the Panel spent another four hours going
    to barns to examine those horses so identified, leading to the scratches (withdrawals) of
    some of those horses for their own protection.
The regular responsibilities and workloads of the Panel members are critical to the
 proper functioning of the CHRB and its commitment to protecting horses and riders, so
 it is essential to relieve those individuals from the added responsibilities of serving on
 the Panel. This requires permanent full-time replacements for the Panel. Additionally, it
 is difficult to meet the Governor’s continued direction that the CHRB provide this
 additional evaluation of horses desiring to race in California, and difficult to justify if the
 CHRB does not establish similar Panels at Northern California thoroughbred tracks and
 fairs, as well as the night quarter horse meet at Los Alamitos. This requires establishing
 at a minimum three Panels with two veterinarians and one steward serving as
 permanent Panel participants. This requires six new Official Veterinarians – two for
 each of the three Panels – and three stewards (one per Panel). The CHRB has
 determined that three permanent Panels providing additional oversight of prospective
 horse entries is cost effective and cost efficient.

 The funding of the six Official Veterinarians will allow the CHRB to manage three
 simultaneously operating Panels at all racetracks in California.

 Six Official Veterinarians – Cost Display

Track            Breed             Work Daily          Cost        2 per    Assignments
                                   Days Rate                       panel
Los Alamitos -   Quarter Horse      144 $551          $79,344     $158,688 Panel Member A
Nights
Los Alamitos -   Thoroughbred          20    $551     $11,020      $22,040 Panel Member B
Days
Santa Anita      Thoroughbred        109     $551 $60,059         $120,118 Panel Member B
Del Mar          Thoroughbred         52     $551 $28,652          $57,304 Panel Member B
Golden Gate      Thoroughbred        200     $551 $110,200        $220,400 Panel Member C
Fields
Fairs            Mixed                95     $551    $52,345      $104,690 Panel Member C
         Total                       620            $341,620      $683,240

 STEWARDS - The proposal request is to modify the current five team member Panel,
 realigning with a three person Panel, to include one steward specifically assigned to
 each Panel, with no additional race day duties. The three stewards will be assigned by
 region, one for daytime racing in the south; one for night time racing in the south, and
 one for daytime racing in the north. Assigning a steward specifically dedicated to Panel
 duties permits existing steward Panel members to return to their regularly scheduled
 duties, which have undergone postponements and delays, creating an assignment
 allocation shortage that cannot be sustained. The three person Panel will be dedicated
 to Panel duties, creating a more efficient continuation of responsibilities for reviewing
 pre-race entries, evaluating work out histories and past performance records to support
 the elimination of high risk horses from competing, benefits fewer equine fatalities and
 directs a safer racing environment for both the equine athlete and jockeys who place
complete confidence in a sound racing encounter. The Panel provides an oversight
necessary for both the trainer of race horses and the racing office taking race day
entries. Trainers who are denied entries of their horses or denied participation in a race
will be forced to eliminate risk factors, improving the odds of a fair sport, and
encourages sound training practices to improve the chance of returning their horse to
the racing competition. The Panel also provides a level of oversight for the racing
office, whose primary job is to put together a sound racing program. As a normal
course of business, the racing office staff do not review high risk factors with horses
entered to race. The Panel serves to guard for and eliminate high risk horses, placing
due diligence on racing office staff evaluating racing entries and serves as a deterrent to
avoid accepting the entry of horses that have been identified as a chance not worth
taking.

The Panel’s role is to recognize horses that statistically are high risk, which are a safety
threat to themselves or other horses in a race. A high-risk horse also creates a safety
hazard for the jockey or other riders participating in the race. The goal of the Panel is to
reduce or eliminate the number of horse fatalities thereby making it safer for the jockeys
and the equine athletes.

CHRB Rule 1542 (Power to Refuse Entry and Deny Eligibility) states that for good
cause, the stewards may refuse the entry of any race or declare ineligible to race and
order a horse removed from the premises. The stewards are the only racing official that
have the authority to refuse an entry and declare horses from a race. No other officials
or licensees have that authority, which makes a steward participation on the fatality
prevention Panel critical to prevent the Panel from losing powers necessary to refuse an
entry or declare a horse from a race.

Three Stewards – Cost Display

Track                   Breed            Work      Daily        Cost        Assignments
                                         Days      Rate
Los Alamitos -          Quarter Horse     144     $551.00      $79,344     Panel Member A
Nights
Los Alamitos - Days     Thoroughbred        20    $551.00      $11,020     Panel Member B
Santa Anita             Thoroughbred       109    $551.00      $60,059     Panel Member B
Del Mar                 Thoroughbred        52    $551.00      $28,652     Panel Member B
Golden Gate Fields      Thoroughbred       200    $551.00     $110,200     Panel Member C
Fairs                   Mixed               95    $551.00      $52,345     Panel Member C
                Total                      620                $341,620

INVESTIGATORS - The CHRB made the decision that each equine fatality occurring at
any California horse racing facility would be investigated using a fatality investigative
team made up of a CHRB Investigator, an Official Veterinarian, and a Safety Steward.
These fatality investigations are very labor intensive, as demonstrated in the
Investigator Workload (Attachment B)

In summary, it requires an average of 61 hours for one investigator to complete one
equine fatality investigation. This workload increases drastically if additional witnesses
are interviewed or additional subpoenas are required. The 61 hours captures only the
Investigator work hours and does not include hours worked by other fatality
investigation team members (the Official Veterinarian or Safety Steward).

With the addition of these new time-consuming fatality investigations, much of the
enforcement staffs existing workload has been deferred or postponed for an
undetermined amount of time. Staffing resources were reallocated from other race
track field offices to assist with fatality investigations which further backlogged existing
workload at those field office race tracks. The CHRB is committed to investigating each
equine fatality at California horse racing facilities in the same systematic and
comprehensive manner. At the current staffing levels, the CHRB Enforcement Division
will be unable to manage these additional caseloads without the other workload
suffering. Some examples of duties that will be delayed or not completed include:
medication violation investigations, drug testing of licensees, walk-in and telephone
customer assistance, barn inspections, criminal history evaluations for license
determination, track backside activity monitoring, narcotic investigations, animal cruelty
investigations, off-track betting facility inspections, etc.
Below is a chart showing the number of equine fatalities that occurred during racing or
training at CHRB facilities over the last five fiscal years:

Equine Fatalities at CHRB Racing/Training Facilities

     Fiscal Year              Total Fatalities
 2014-2015                                   133
 2015-2016                                   161
 2016-2017                                   162
 2017-2018                                   112
 2018-2019                                   106

In 2017-2018, there were 112 equine fatalities at CHRB facilities. In 2018-2019, there
were 106 fatalities. To estimate the number of staff needed to investigate equine
fatalities state-wide, the combined average of equine fatalities of the past two fiscal
years was used to determine the projected workload.
Equine Fatality Investigations - Investigator Staff Needed

 Calculation    Workload Description                                      Past Year’s
 Letter                                                                   Calculation
 A              Number of Fatality Investigations (Average of Last            109
                Two Fiscal Years)
 B              Hours per Investigation                                        61
 C              Work Hours Needed to Complete Investigations (A x             6,649
                B)
 D              1 FTE Investigator Annual Work Hours                          2,080
 E              Number of FTE Investigators Needed (C divided by              3.20
                D)

Using the average estimated fatality case volume above, the CHRB will need 3.2
additional staff to investigate fatality cases. This proposal requests the addition of 3.0
Investigators to handle equine fatality workload increases. With the implementation of
the new fatality investigative teams and other improved track safety measures, the
CHRB anticipates the equine fatalities in California will decrease. If the fatality numbers
decrease, the additional 3.0 Investigators will utilize any available time on other duties
listed in the “Workload Analysis”.

E.     Outcomes and Accountability
STEWARDS
Before the Panel was established for daytime thoroughbred racing in the southern zone,
the daily responsibilities of the Safety Steward included monitoring activities during
morning training and the racing program in the afternoon. The morning work included
enforcing CHRB rules relative to the welfare and safety of the horse and rider, such as
ensuring all riders are wearing the proper safety vests and helmets, performing tests on
the racing surfaces, assisting CHRB Investigators with barn inspections and supervising
the administration of Lasix (an anti-bleeder medication) to most horses entered to run
that day. In the afternoon, the Safety Steward keeps watch over “detention stalls,” i.e.,
stalls for horses entered to run that day, making sure no one entered the stall, applied
prohibited topical medications, etc., Responsibilities also included random inspections
of the jockeys’ quarters, completing accident reports and assisting the Board of
Stewards during hearings, as needed.
After the Panel was formed, however, approximately four hours of the Safety Steward’s
day was allocated to that important work. The other responsibilities were thereby
compromised. The additional resources sought via this BCP will not only allow for the
Safety Steward’s continued participation on the Panel but the enhanced performance of
the pre-Panel responsibilities described above. In addition, the important work of the
Panel can be duplicated at racetracks throughout the state, improving protecting the
welfare and safety of horses and riders throughout California.
OFFICIAL VETERINARIANS
 The Official Veterinarian’s (OV) responsibilities are stipulated under CHRB Rule 1560.
 They include supervision of the receiving barn, where horses are isolated prior to each
 race; the testing barn, where blood and urine samples are collected following each race
 with chain-of-custody established for each; the administration and maintenance of the
 “Veterinarian’s List,” on which horses that are deemed by the Official Veterinarian to be
 sick, injured, lame or unsound are prohibited from racing; supervision of all
 CHRB-licensed practicing veterinarians; and, perhaps most important, the Official
 Veterinarian conducts pre-race physical examinations of all horses entered to race that
 afternoon or evening.

 INVESTIGATORS

 Three Investigator positions requested would be assigned as presented in the
 chart below:

   Race Track Location                 Current Investigator   Proposed Investigator
                                       Staff                  Staff Increase
   Santa Anita Park                    3.0                    1.0
   Los Alamitos Race Course            2.0                    1.0
   California Exposition/State Fair    2.0                    0.0
   Golden Gate Fields                  3.0                    1.0
   Total                               10.0                   3.0

 Investigations include the identification of potential regulatory modifications to increase
 rules governing equine safety and welfare issues that can impact riders and those
 employed during the race meet. Outcomes of investigative case results can include
 licensee adverse action if CHRB rules or criminal law violations occur. Adding 3.0
 Investigator positions helps CHRB, the industry regulatory body, make sure equine
 fatality cases are investigated thoroughly to protect the interests of all parties involved
 and enforce a safe racing experience.

 Projected Outcomes

Workload Measure             2019-20     2020-21    2021-22 2022-23       2023-24 2024-25
Review preliminary           10          109        109     109           109     109
documents
Search and obtain            10          109        109        109        109        109
"Veterinary Confidential"
records
Identify all                 10          109        109        109        109        109
trainers/veterinarians for
case
Workload Measure             2019-20    2020-21     2021-22 2022-23        2023-24 2024-25
Database review of all       30         327         327     327            327     327
parties
Request Subpoenas            30         327         327        327         327        327
Serve Subpoenas              30         327         327        327         327        327
Receive and process          30         327         327        327         327        327
subpoena returns
Review records               60         654         654        654         654        654
(vet/training, medication,
race, necropsy, etc.)
Follow-up if not all         10         109         109        109         109        109
records received from
subpoena
Prepare for interviews       30         327         327        327         327        327
Schedule interviews          30         327         327        327         327        327
Interview veterinarian       10         109         109        109         109        109
Interview Trainer            10         109         109        109         109        109
Interview Jockey/Rider       10         109         109        109         109        109
Other interviews             10         109         109        109         109        109
Meetings with                20         218         218        218         218        218
investigative team
Discuss investigation with   10         109         109        109         109        109
Supervisor/Chief
Review audio recordings      30         327         327        327         327        327
of interviews/take notes
for report
Write investigative report   10         109         109        109         109        109
Prepare investigation        10         109         109        109         109        109
report package
Total Fatality               10         109         109        109         109        109
Investigations Completed

 F.     Analysis of All Feasible Alternatives
 Alternative 1: Approve the Request for 3.0 Additional Investigator Positions; 6.0 Official
 Veterinarian and 3.0 Steward Contractors

 • Pro: Allows the Board to continue the new safety procedure, with panels at all
 California tracks. Ensuring the safety of all equine athletes and those working at the
 race track facilities is an integral part of the CHRB mission statement. Thorough and
 timely investigations of all equine fatalities will lead to the identification of safety and
 legislative changes that will ultimately improve safety for all involved in California horse
 racing. Given the current climate in horse racing, public perception is paramount to the
 success of the industry, which would provide dedicated resources to all equine fatality
 cases at California race tracks.
• Con: Results in increased state costs.

Alternative 2: Approve Partial Contractor and Work Force Increase

• Pro: The current fatality rates for horses while racing and training are threatening the
viability of the racing industry, which provides thousands of jobs for Californians and has
a deep economic impact beyond the track’s to the farms and the state’s greenbelt. A
partial work force increase will begin to address the extra workload generated by the
formation of the equine fatality investigation teams, although the timeline for case
completion will require extension due to limited staff and contractor resources. This
option assumes some mandated and high priority work will be delayed or incur long
term postponement.

• Con: Results in increased state costs.

• Con: This alternative limits the Panel’s progress and results in the department having
to limit taking action to improve injury results impacting health and safety.

Alternative 3: Utilize Retired Annuitant Investigator resources

• Pro: A viable resource includes Retired Annuitant Investigators, however, in order to
investigate these fatality cases or any other CHRB enforcement duties, it is essential
the Retired Annuitant have basic horse racing investigation experience. Applicants with
that experience are uncommon. If the department is fortunate to locate and appoint
qualified Retired Annuitant candidates, which is a part-time commitment, this would
support a portion of the extra workload generated by the formation of the equine fatality
investigation teams. Retired Annuitants are limited to 960 hours per year. To equate to
a full-time equivalent position, six Retired Annuitants would be necessary to manage the
additional fatality investigation workload. It would be very difficult to identify and hire
that number of Retired Annuitants with the specialized knowledge required to
investigate horse racing cases.

• Con: The part-time work schedule would make it logistically difficult to manage a
positive impact on the additional fatality workload demands.

• Con: Results in increased state costs.

Alternative 4: Do Not Increase Staffing nor Contractor Resources

• Pro: Does not increase state costs.

• Con: This option places the CHRB in the difficult and compromising position of
imposing drastic workload increases without sufficient resources. The CHRB is
challenged with protecting the public’s interest in an industry that is fighting for the
public’s confidence while also vying for a competitive edge. A strong presence is a
difficult objective with limited resources tasked to oversee statewide fatality review
operations. The new fatality investigation teams and contractor fatality review Panel
remain a high priority for the CHRB and the Governor’s Office. Without additional
resources, mandated and high priority enforcement work must be suspended,
postponed or deferred.

G.     Implementation Plan
Upon enactment of the 2020-21 Budget Act, personal service contracts for Stewards
and Official Veterinarians will be executed with the intent of assignment confirmation to
the fatality review Panel as expeditiously as contract processing can occur.

Upon approval, the CHRB would initiate recruitment, interview candidates, make job
offers, and begin the background investigation of chosen investigator candidates. The
CHRB would expect to hire new staff within three months of recruitment
commencement. Overhead expenditures for one investigator, including equipment,
supplies and training, are expected to cost $ 6,300 annually, and to be absorbed by
existing fiscal resources, and would not be funded by this request.

H.     Supplemental Information
Please see Attachment A – 2019 CHRB Licensed Race Meets and
Attachment B – Workload Analysis for additional information.

I.     Recommendation
Recommend approval of an augmentation of $1,334,000 in 2020-21, and ongoing,
permitting the execution of personal service contracts for 3.0 horse racing stewards, for
6.0 Official Veterinarians; as well as 3.0 full time permanent investigator positions, all to
serve on horse fatality prevention Panels statewide.
Attachment A – 2019 CHRB Licensed Race Meets
Thoroughbred Meetings – Central and Southern Zones:

Race Track Location             Dates
Santa Anita Winter / Spring     12/19/18 – 06/25/19
Los Alamitos                    06/26/19 – 07/16/19
Del Mar Summer                  07/17/19 – 09/03/19
Santa Anita Fall                09/25/19 – 11/05/19
Del Mar Fall                    11/06/19 – 12/03/19
Los Alamitos Winter             12/04/19 – 12/17/19

Thoroughbred Meetings – Northern Zones:

Race Track Location                   Dates
Golden Gate Fields Winter / Spring    12/19/18 – 06/09/19
Golden Gate Fields Summer             08/15/19 – 09/29/19
Golden Gate Fields Fall               10/17/19 – 12/11/19

Quarter Horse Meetings – Statewide:

Race Track Location             Dates
Los Alamitos                    12/26/18 – 12/17/19

Quarter Harness Meetings – Statewide:

Race Track Location             Dates
Cal-Expo                        12/26/18 – 05/07/19
Cal-Expo                        10/27/19 – 12/23/19

Fair Meetings – Statewide:

Race Track Location             Dates
Pleasanton                      06/13/19 – 07/07/19
State Fair (Cal Expo)           07/12/19 – 07/28/19
Santa Rosa                      08/01/19 – 08/11/19
Ferndale                        08/16/19 – 08/25/19
Los Alamitos (LA County Fair    09/04/19 – 09/24/19
at Los Alamitos
Fresno                          10/04/19 – 10/14/19
Estimated Horse Population*

 Location                           Population
 Thoroughbred, South                                  2,750
 Thoroughbred, North                                  1,300
 Quarter horse, Statewide                               850
 Harness, Statewide                                     350
 Total Estimated Population                           5,250
*Varies according to time of year; includes off-site stabling at CHRB-licensed
facilities at Los Alamitos and San Luis Rey Downs. Horses may be transported to
the operating racetrack.
Attachment B – Workload Analysis
    Below is a workload analysis for one CHRB Investigator in a one-year period. This
    workload has been consistent over the past five years.
Number Workload Description                                     Number     Hours to     Yearly
of Duties                                                       of Tasks Complete       Hours
            Hours writing investigative reports (average 94
1                                                                   94        1.70       160
            reports)
2           Hours to perform barn inspections                      240        0.50       120
            Hours to gather and review investigative
3                                                                  220        0.50       110
            documents
4           Hours interviewing witnesses                           220        0.50       110
            Hours    to monitor equines, backstretch workers,
5                                                                  100        1.00       100
            facilities and equipment
6           Hours investigating applicant's fitness for license    400        0.25       100
            Hours to review voice mail/e-mail
7                                                                  475        0.20        95
            complaints/issues
8           Hours to document and process evidence seized          182        0.50        91
           Hours discussing cases with Equine Medical
9                                                                180          0.50        90
           Director/track Veterinarian
10         Hours for walk-in issues/complaints                   450          0.20        90
11         Hours for internal/external facility inspection       45           2.00        90
12         Hours to conduct breath/urine licensee testing        425          0.20        85
           Hours to open investigation/review preliminary
13                                                               160          0.50        80
           documents
14         Hours to work with track security staff               160          0.50        80
15         Hours to present cases at a Hearing                   80           1.00        80
16         Hours reviewing licensee history/actions              160          0.50        80
17         Hours evaluating licensee criminal histories          140          0.50        70
18         Hours to work with track staff/management             130          0.50        65
19         Hours assisting with Financial Complaints             60           1.00        60
20         Hours for Hearing case preparation                    60           1.00        60
21         Hours to discuss case with complainant                 80          0.75        60
           Hours tracking criminal case status/ordering court
22                                                                30          2.00        60
           documents
23         Hours travel to facilities statewide                   13          3.00        40
24         Hours for off-track/auxiliary facility inspection      12          3.00        35
25         Hours monitoring paddock area/jockey room              40          .075        30
26         Hours in Training                                       1         24.00        24
           Hours with law enforcement, animal control,
27                                                                 2          7.50        15
           health department
           Total Hours                                                                  2,080
You can also read