Brookfield Property Partners L.P - Investor Meeting September 29, 2016
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Table of Contents Our Business 3 Brian Kingston, Senior Managing Partner, Chief Executive Officer Core Office 17 Ric Clark, Senior Managing Partner, Chairman Urban Multifamily 35 Lowell Baron, Managing Partner, Head of Multifamily Retail Business 47 Ashley Lawrence, Senior Vice President, Asset Management – Retail Opportunistic Investment Strategy 64 Brian Kingston, Senior Managing Partner, Chief Executive Officer Financial Update 75 Bryan Davis, Managing Partner, Chief Financial Officer Wrap-up / Q&A 89 Brian Kingston, Senior Managing Partner, Chief Executive Officer 2
Brookfield Property Partners is Brookfield’s primary vehicle to make investments across all strategies in real estate Brookfield Property Partners L.P. (BPY) Through Participation in Direct Brookfield Private Funds Core Core-Plus Value-Add Opportunistic 4
Our goal is to be the leading global owner & operator of high-quality real estate, generating an attractive total return for our unitholders comprised of: Current yield backed by stable cash flow from a diversified portfolio of assets 5-8% annual distribution growth Capital appreciation of our asset base 5
Stable, predictable cash flows from our Core Office and Retail units are enhanced by our higher-yielding Opportunistic strategies Core Office & Retail Opportunistic 10% to 12% Total Returns 20% Total Returns • Currently 80% of BPY’s balance sheet • 20% of BPY’s balance sheet • Investing in high-quality, trophy assets • Investing in mispriced portfolios, • Provides stable cash flow with growth and capital properties with significant value-add appreciation • Provides capital appreciation 6
Proven approach to investing • We are value-oriented, counter-cyclical investors • We specialize in executing multi-faceted transactions that allow us to acquire high-quality assets at a discount to replacement cost • We leverage our business units to enhance the value of our investments • We have the flexibility to allocate capital to the sectors and geographies with the best risk-adjusted returns • We continually recycle capital from stabilized assets to higher-yielding assets in order to build long-term value for unitholders 7
Brookfield Property Partners has undergone significant, transformative growth in the three years since spin-out 8
Progress since spin-out… • Completed $5 billion acquisition of Brookfield Office Properties and reduced balance sheet concentration in public securities from 80% to 30% • Invested $1 billion in General Growth Properties to increase interest to 34%1 • Invested $1.8 billion alongside our joint venture partner to privatize Canary Wharf and increase our interest to 50% • Issued $6 billion of perpetual equity • Recycled $5 billion of capital out of mature office and retail assets • Invested $3 billion in new Brookfield-sponsored funds 1) Represents BPY’ s fully diluted interest in GGP 9
Through organic growth in existing markets… 2013 UK & Europe $4B Canada $8B Australia $9B United States $70B Brazil $4B 10
…and expansion into new markets we have grown AUM to over $146 Billion1 Today UK & Europe $23B Canada $7B China - $0.5B Middle East - $0.1B Australia United States $7B $105B India - $1.2B Brazil $3B 1) Figure represents AUM of Brookfield Property Group. BPY’ s proportionate total assets have grown to approximately $66 billion 11
We have also expanded into a number of new asset classes… 2013 TODAY PRIMARY Traditional real estate sectors that Core Office Core Office have deep public and private Core Retail Core Retail institutional capital markets Multifamily Multifamily Logistics ESTABLISHED Alternative real estate sectors that Suburban Office Suburban Office have deep public and private capital Alternate Retail Alternate Retail markets Hotels Net Leases NON-TRADITIONAL Some public market presence and Self-Storage analyst coverage but highly Manufactured fragmented and largely privately held Housing Student Housing 12
…and built a diversified portfolio of premier properties • 149 premier office properties totaling 101 million square feet (“msf”) in gateway markets around the world • 10 msf of office and multifamily development projects currently underway • Interest in 128 best-in-class retail properties totaling 125 msf throughout the United States • High-quality assets with operational upside including: • 35,000 multifamily units in the United States • 54 msf of industrial in modern logistics properties in North America and Europe • 18,400 hotel rooms throughout the United States, Europe and Australia • Over 300 triple net lease properties throughout the United States • Over 150 self-storage assets in the United States • 13 student housing properties in the United Kingdom 13
...Which has led to significant growth of business 2013 TODAY Total Assets ($ billions) 31 113% 66 Total Equity ($ billions) 13 69% 22 Company FFO ($ millions) 570 67% 950+ Value per Unit ($) 25 20% 30 Distribution per Unit ($) 1.00 12% 1.12 14
Continue to be focused on key objectives Enhance the flexibility of our balance sheet In 2016: • Refinanced corporate credit facility, upsizing capacity from $2.0 to $2.5 billion, reducing interest costs by 55bps and extending maturity to 2019 • BBB credit rating from S&P • Issued C$200 million of perpetual preferred shares, using proceeds to repay on-demand capital securities Recycle capital • $1.5 billion of net equity year to date; on target for $2.0 billion in 2016 • Proceeds redeployed: • Repayment of BPO acquisition facility • Private fund capital calls • Development funding • Repurchase of units 15
Continue to be focused on key objectives Stabilize occupancy in Core Office and Retail portfolios • Flat occupancy in existing office portfolio at 92% • Development pre-leasing increased at One Manhattan West, Principal Place and Brookfield Place Calgary • Stable occupancy in Core Retail portfolio at 95% Share price to reflect value of business • Active investor relations program • Index inclusion • Buying back units 16
Core Office – Ric Clark 17
Brookfield’s Core Office business features an iconic, irreplaceable portfolio of the world’s most sought-after commercial properties 18
Iconic Properties Premier locations, high-quality properties in the most dynamic, resilient cities around the globe Brookfield Place, New York City Canary Wharf, London Potsdamer Platz, Berlin Brookfield Place, Toronto Darling Park, Sydney Brookfield Place, Perth 19
Comprehensive Capabilities We offer a full suite of real estate services for our tenants, assuring them of best-in-class quality and service throughout the lifecycle of our properties “…Of our top 20 office tenants, 75% are in Brookfield buildings in more than one city and 50% are in buildings in more than three cities, which speaks to the consistency and quality of our properties.” 20
Scale of Operations We have $15 billion of capital invested in Core Office 149 18 PROPERTIES CITIES 101msf 6 PORTFOLIO SIZE COUNTRIES 92% 1,600 OCCUPANCY EMPLOYEES 8.3yrs 9msf AVERAGE AVERAGE ANNUAL LEASE TERM LEASING VOLUME 21
Stable Income Long average lease life, market diversification and high-quality tenants produce very stable income NET OPERATING INCOME (US$ in millions) $ 2,000 Other Canada 14% $ 1,500 Australia 16% 50% U.S. $ 1,000 18% UK $ 500 2013 2014 2015 2016 1 1) Forecast to reflect incremental NOI at Brookfield Place New York 22
Organic Growth Significant income growth driven by recently signed leases at Brookfield Place New York and increasing occupancy SAME PROPERTY NOI GROWTH (in natural currency) 14% 12% 10% 8% 6% 4% 2% 0% Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 23
We have been taking advantage of strong pricing and demand for stabilized office assets in select core markets to extract equity capital and reinvest in higher yielding opportunities 24
Asset Sales On track to achieve goal of raising $2 billion of equity from asset sales in 2016 Interest Net Proceeds Cap Property City Sold (US$ Millions) Rate World Square Retail Sydney 100% $ 200 4.2% Royal Centre Vancouver 100% 220 3.3% Principal Place London 50% 360 4.0% Two Ballston Plaza Greater Washington, DC 100% 60 5.6% Potsdamer Platz Berlin 25% 170 3.4% One New York Plaza New York City 33% 550 4.6% King Street Wharf Sydney 100% 30 4.9% One Shelley Street Sydney 100% 250 5.1% Total $ 1,840 4.2% 25
Case Study Acquisition of Potsdamer Platz, Berlin’s premier mixed-use property estate • Capitalizing on Brookfield’s unique capability to underwrite, acquire and asset manage a large-scale mixed-use trophy estate that spans office, retail, multifamily, hospitality, leisure and gaming COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE • Motivated seller divested asset as part of mandatory liquidation of a maturing closed-end fund and required transaction assurance of a well-capitalized buyer with strong lending and JV equity relationships • Market vacancy at 10-year low in 2016 • Rental growth in Berlin has consistently outpaced other major STRONG German cities MARKET FUNDAMENTALS • Demand driven by growing technology, media and telecommunications (TMT) sector tenants particularly strong with 40% of total leases executed • Brookfield expertise in lease-ups of significant vacancy – increased VALUE office occupancy from 53% to 75% in first 9 months of control ENHANCEMENT • 85 residential units had been held vacant by previous owner in MEASURES condo conversion exercise; Brookfield’s plan is to aggressively re- lease as rentals to tap into existing apartment demand on the estate 26
Development Strategy • Earn premium risk-adjusted returns compared to acquisitions • Upgrade our portfolio with new, trophy assets in strategic markets • Mitigate risk by typically securing: – Anchor leases for 40-50% prior to launch – Maximum price construction contracts – Construction financing with term extensions – JV equity partners once project is substantially de-risked – Limit development capital to
Development Activity 7.3msf UNDER DEVELOPMENT 56% PRE-LEASED 7% AVERAGE YIELD-ON-COST $300M INCREMENTAL NOI 28
Active Development Projects Building best-in-class regional headquarters premises for a diversified high-credit-quality tenant roster Sq. Ft. Pre- Date of Cost1 Project City (000’s) Leased Completion (US$ millions) Yield Principal Place London 621 84% Q4 2016 $ 510 8% L’Oreal Brazil HQ Rio de Janeiro 197 100% Q1 2017 40 12% London Wall Place London 505 73% Q2 2017 270 7% Brookfield Place East Calgary 1,400 81% Q3 2017 620 7% 655 New York Avenue Washington, DC 766 70% Q3 2018 290 7% 100 Bishopsgate London 938 38% Q4 2018 1,140 7% 1 Bank Street London 715 40% Q2 2019 330 7% One Manhattan West New York 2,117 30% Q4 2019 1,060 6% Total 7,259 56% $ 4,260 7% 1) At BPY’ s proportionate share 29
Development Income At current capitalization rates this income stream is worth ~$7 billion (US$ in millions) $ 300 $ 200 $ 100 $0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Brazil UK Canada U.S. 30
Next Phase of Developments Over 8 million square foot pipeline will fuel growth post-2021 Project City Sq. Ft. (000’s) Manhattan West New York 2,296 ICD Brookfield Place Dubai 1,079 10 Bank Street London 857 Shell Centre London 317 North Quay London 2,400 One Park Place London 680 Wood Wharf – Phase 1 London 338 Bay Adelaide Centre North Toronto 825 Total 8,792 31
Insulated from ‘Brexit Effect’… We maintain our view that the UK will remain a very important center of commerce in the world, and that an acceptable deal with the EU will be negotiated • 98% leased to high-credit-quality tenant roster • Average remaining lease term of 12 years • Current developments 55% pre-leased ahead of delivery in 2017-19 timeframe • Completed £515 million construction facility on 100 Bishopsgate following Brexit outcome • Only 5% of total BPY equity exposed to British pound 32
….and Energy Market Downturn Energy markets1 are seeing increasing demand from tenants seeking “flight to quality” opportunities which align with Brookfield’s portfolio attributes • 91% leased to high-credit-quality tenant roster • Average remaining lease-term of 7.4 years • Manageable lease expiry through year-end 2019 • Current development 81% pre-leased • Executed 1.2 msf of leases in the last 18 months • Only 6% of total BPY’s total assets exposed to these markets 1) Data on this slide attributable to BPY’ s Core Office business in Houston, Calgary and Perth 33
Brookfield has built its real estate business by capitalizing on distressed assets and businesses in capital-deprived markets and will continue to monitor the current investment landscape for such opportunities 34
Urban Multifamily – Lowell Baron 35
Brookfield is building a core investment platform of premier Urban Multifamily rental assets Creating a long-term, best-in-class urban multifamily business complementary and with similar characteristics to Brookfield’s established, highly regarded global office portfolio Initial strategy includes a build-to-core model, leveraging urban infill parcels owned within the office business as well as newly sourced transactions Acquiring single assets or portfolios will become a major avenue of growth for the right opportunities and at the right time 36
Brookfield’s History of Multifamily Investment 2010/11 2012 2013 2014 2015 Recapitalizes Acquires 4,900 unit Acquires 4,275 unit Acquires 3,962 unit Privatizes AEC for Fairfield portfolio for portfolio for portfolio in $2.5 billion - $500 million $290 million Manhattan for 14,200 unit $1 billion portfolio Commits $50 Commits $300 Construction million to first million to second begins on Value-Add fund Value-Add fund Manhattan West residential tower (879 units) Acquires four development projects in US representing 2,350 units Properties 4 23 70 90 150 Units 1,270 6,680 19,010 26,700 42,060 GAV (US millions) $140 $715 $1,980 $4,030 $7,400 37
Scale of Operations1 ~ 38,000 Detroit Cleveland/ UNITS Columbus Seattle Boston Metro New York City Sacramento 129 San Francisco San Jose Denver Indianapolis Washington, DC Metro PROPERTIES Virginia Beach Los Angeles Las Vegas Charlotte Inland Empire Charlottesville Phoenix Atlanta Raleigh/Durham 94% San Antonio Dallas Metro Tampa OCCUPANCY Houston Miami / Ft. Lauderdale / West Palm Beach 1,600 ~ EMPLOYEES 1) Only includes U.S. assets 38
Why Urban Multifamily? Cities are places of collaboration, innovation and opportunity - The urbanization trend exists because cities make people smarter, healthier and happier • 50% of the world’s population lives in cities; figure expected to rise Urbanization to 75% by 2050 Global • Cities generate 80% of today’s total GDP; figure expected to rise Growth to 90% by 2050 Concentrated • More urbanized countries have incomes on average 5x those of Wealth less urbanized countries • People of all ages choose urban living for: (1) Social possibilities Social and networking; (2) Attractions, entertainment, shopping and Connectivity restaurants; (3) Public transit and walkability; (4) Access to medical care and services for seniors Sources: McKinsey & Company, MIT and Edward Glaeser (Harvard Economics Professor) 39
Historical Returns Multifamily has been one of the top performing asset types over the long term with a favorable risk-to-return profile Sector Compounded Annual Returns Since 1994 Returns/Risk (Sharpe Ratio) Since 1994 Source: NAREIT (data through 2015) 40
U.S. Multifamily Rent Growth Expected rent growth of 3.7% in 2016 with select markets experiencing double-digit increases Apartment Rent Growth Source: Axiometrics 41
U.S. Multifamily Occupancy Rates Historically strong and stable occupancy rates Apartment Occupancy Rates Source: Axiometrics 42
U.S. Homeownership Rate Declining homeownership creating incremental demand for apartments U.S. Homeownership Rate 69.0% 68.9% 68.8% 68.2% 67.8% 67.4% 66.9% Long Term Average – 66.2% 64% 65.5% 65.1% 64.5% 63.8% 63.0% 62.8% 62.7% 62.3% 62.5% 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Green Street Advisors 43
Target Markets • “Coastal core” markets of New York City, Boston, Washington DC, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Seattle • Also targeting markets that offer a great lifestyle, affordable cost of living, are business friendly and have a diversified economy Seattle Portland Boston New York City San Francisco Washington, DC Denver San Jose Los Angeles San Diego Atlanta Dallas Austin Houston Miami 44
Active Development Projects Active development pipeline with value in excess of $2 billion Date of Cost1 Project City # of Units Completion (US$ millions) Yield For Rent Three Manhattan West Manhattan 473 Q1 2018 $ 414 5% Greenpoint Landing - G Brooklyn 341 Q1 2019 273 6% Camarillo Ventura County 446 Q3 2019 128 7% Newfoundland London 636 Q4 2019 322 4% For Sale Principal Place London 329 Q1 2019 249 N/A Shell Centre London 597 Q3 2019 219 N/A Total 2,822 $ 1,605 5% 1) At BPY’ s proportionate share 45
Future Development Projects … and value in excess of $1 billion from our future development pipeline Date of Cost1 Project City # of Units Completion (US$ millions) Yield For Rent Wood Wharf Phase I London 677 Q4 2019 $ 245 5% Greenpoint Landing - F Brooklyn 400 Q3 2020 364 6% 1810 Main Houston 286 Q2 2019 81 7% Westcreek Houston 409 Q4 2020 166 7% Dallas Hi-Line Dallas 426 Q4 2020 164 7% Studio Plaza Silver Spring 343 Q1 2019 106 7% Total 2,541 $1,126 6% 1) At BPY’ s proportionate share 46
Retail Business – Ashley Lawrence 47
The premier quality assets and operations in our Core Retail business mirrors that of the Core Office portfolio These class A malls are long-term investments that provide stable cash flow 48
Through our 34% fully diluted interest in General Growth Properties (“GGP”) we are invested in 100 of the top 500 malls in the United States 49
Scale of Operations We have $9 billion of capital invested in Core Retail 128 PROPERTIES 125msf PORTFOLIO SIZE 95% OCCUPANCY $583psf AVG. TENANT SALES 50
Although there is much publicity about the decline of brick-and-mortar shopping in the face of increased online retail, the statistics do not support this 51
Regional Mall Visitation by Generation For one, millennials are shopping in malls more than any other living generation PROPENSITY TO SHOP AT LEAST ONCE EVERY 3 MONTHS (100 = Average Shopper) 150 100 50 Millenials (18-34) Gen Xers (35-49) Baby Boomers (50-65) Silents (Over 65) Sources: GGP Strategy & Analytics, Nielsen Local, 2014-2015. 400,489 respondents 52
Same-Property Occupancy …and our mall occupancy has stayed consistently in the 95% range for several years SAME-PROPERTY OCCUPANCY 100% 98% 96% 94% 92% 90% 88% 86% 84% 82% 80% Q1 2014 Q2 2014 Q3 2014 Q4 2014 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3 2015 Q4 2015 Q1 2016 Q2 2016 Source: GGP 53
Tenant Sales At the same time our tenants’ sales continue to increase… TENANT SALES/PSF (
Core Retail Mall Sales and NOI Percentage by Rank Top Properties 2016 Sales/psf % of NOI1 Top 10 $792 23% Top 30 $727 48% Top 50 $677 67% Top 100 $598 96% Total $583 100% Source: GGP 1) Percentage of GGP’ s reported Company NOI 55
Redeveloping Obsolete Big-Box Stores Since 2011, GGP has redeveloped 82 vacant department stores for a total cost of $1.4 billion, generating an 11% annual return “The decline of certain big-box retailers has unlocked the opportunity to convert these spaces into more productive uses, including full-service restaurants, chef-driven food halls, high-end grocers, fitness centers and movie theaters.” 56
Core Retail – 2016 Asset Sales Similar to Core Office, we have been raising equity capital by selling interests in premier quality U.S. malls at near or peak valuations (~4% cap rates)… Interest Net Proceeds Property City Sold (US$ Millions)1 Fashion Show Las Vegas, NV 50% $ 282 Eastridge Mall San Jose, CA 100% 74 Pioneer Place (office) Portland, OR 100% 40 One Stockton San Francisco, CA 49.8% 11 522 Fifth Avenue New York, NY 10% 6 Owings Mills Mall Owings Mills, MD 50% 4 Newgate Mall Salt Lake City, UT 100% 3 Total $ 420 1) At BPY’ s fully-diluted interest 57
Core Retail – Development Sites …and reinvesting proceeds into higher-yielding development and redevelopment initiatives Stabilized Cost1 Project City Description Year (US$ millions) Return Ala Moana Center Honolulu Anchor Repositioning 2018 $ 15 9-10% Staten Island Mall New York Expansion 2019 60 8-9% Other Various Redevelopment 2017-18 70 6-8% Under construction $ 145 7-9% The SoNo Collection Norwalk Ground-up development 2020 80 8-10% Other Various Redevelopment TBD 75 8-9% Total under construction and in planning $ 300 8-9% 1) At BPY’ s proportionate cost 58
We made an incremental investment in the class B mall sector through the recent privatization of Rouse Properties… Not all B malls are created equal! 59
Rouse Properties 35 PROPERTIES 24msf PORTFOLIO SIZE 91% IN-LINE OCCUPANCY $2.9billion GROSS ASSET VALUE 60
Rouse Properties – Mall Portfolio In many instances these malls represent the ‘only game in town’ – limited competition and appealing demographics 61
We have identified $200 million of non-strategic assets in lower-tier markets for disposition in the near-term And expect to recycle this capital into new acquisitions and redevelopment of existing assets 62
Rouse Properties – Value Creation and Growth • We have 17 redevelopment projects requiring $155 million to complete at expected returns of 9-11% Shoppes at Carlsbad Redevelopment Completion Q2 2018 • We are targeting acquisitions in retail locations along the coasts and in select markets with high population densities and significant value creation opportunities 63
Opportunistic Investments – Brian Kingston 64
Brookfield Property Partners participates in Opportunistic real estate strategies to diversify the investment portfolio and bolster returns 65
The assets acquired in this strategy are of high-quality, but have operational upside through efficiencies and synergies with Brookfield’s global operating footprint 66
Investment Approach Counter- • Sectors or markets that are out-of-favor Cyclical / and where capital is scarce Contrarian • Distressed assets, activist investors / Investments public-to-private, socioeconomic headwinds Multi-faceted / • Fragmented industries with outsized Structured returns Transactions • Avoid auctions Proprietary • Identify operational improvements and Investments synergies 67
Case Study Acquisition of Simply Self Storage, the largest privately held self-storage owner/operator in the U.S. and 7th largest overall • Transaction sourced through Brookfield relationship with Brighton, Massachusetts previous owners/operator TRANSACTION • Forward cap rate of 6.6% represents a significant discount MERITS to recent portfolio transactions in the sector Grand Rapids Michigan • Sector is attractive due to limited new supply and growing demand Farmington Hills, Michigan • Lack of available capital by previous owners provides opportunity to redevelop and add density to existing asset GROWTH base OPPORTUNITY • Acquire individual, small/medium portfolios in secondary markets where public REITs are not active Grand Rapids, • Develop new assets in primary and secondary markets Michigan • Existing management team was retained and expanded EXPERIENCED MANAGEMENT • CEO is a 20 year veteran of the storage sector and is the operating member of a joint venture with Brookfield 68
Case Study Acquisition of a portfolio of seven high-quality assets located in prime regions of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro • Flight of capital / lack of competition in region due to geo- political instability and uncertain near-term economic landscape • Off-market opportunity sourced through long-standing CONTRARIAN THESIS relationships with both portfolio owner and owner’s majority shareholder Alfa Laval São Paulo • Successful history of investing in market with strong underlying economic indicators in medium- to long-term • Acquisition, at ~40% discount to replacement cost, of newly HIGH-QUALITY delivered, high-quality assets ASSETS • Portfolio of primarily AAA assets in prime regions of São Paulo Cidade Jardim and Rio de Janeiro São Paulo • Long-term leases in place with inflation-protected income STABILITY + streams to investment-grade multinational tenants GROWTH • Vacancy concentrated in 2 of the 7 properties • Ability to fill vacancy by offering competitive rents due to low JK Complex – Towers D & E investment basis São Paulo 69
BPY Fund Commitments …We now have $4 billion of capital invested in Opportunistic strategies Size BPY Target BPY’s Equity2 Fund Strategy/Sector(s) Year(s) ($US Millions) (%) Return1 ($US Millions) Opportunistic/ BSREP II 2015 $ 9,000 26 20%+ $ 1,350 Diversified Opportunistic/ BSREP I 2012 4,350 31 20%+ 1,850 Diversified Value-Add/ VAMF Series 2011-15 1,900 34 14-16% 300 Multifamily Debt/ BREF Series 2004-14 3,125 27 12-13% 200 Diversified Other direct 500 Total $ 4,200 1) Targeted gross internal rate of return (“IRR”) – There can be no assurance that the funds will achieve returns within the target ed range or within a comparable range or will be able to avoid losses 2) Represents BPY’ s invested equity to-date 70
…Which has given us exposure to new sectors and new geographies with our capital invested alongside partners 71
…A sizeable pipeline of investments will continue to broaden our sector and geographic exposure • In binding agreement to purchase second largest privately held manufactured housing portfolio in North America NEW SECTORS • Highly-fragmented, recession-resistant sector has achieved positive same-store NOI growth every quarter for last 20 years • In advanced negotiations to acquire the premier, mixed-use 5.4msf International Financial Center complex in Seoul, South Korea • Tenant roster of large, multinational corporations – many ‘repeat NEW MARKETS customers’ in Brookfield’s global portfolio • Discount to replacement cost with upside from active lease-up strategy and repositioning of retail and hotel offerings • Building on 2014 acquisition of Candor Office Park portfolio in Delhi, India, in advanced negotiations to acquire a 4.2msf portfolio of PLATFORM prime office and retail properties in Mumbai EXPANSION • Portfolio located in Powai submarket – the ‘Silicon Valley’ of India – high-quality infrastructure and location • Acquisition basis at discount to replacement cost with upside from platform integration and repositioning to ‘Live-Work-Play’ community 72
While our investment in Opportunistic strategies will continue to grow, we intend to limit it to 25% of our balance sheet 73
Self-“Fund”ing BPY’s Opportunistic investment strategy will be largely self-funding as we begin to harvest capital from legacy funds CUMULATIVE RETURN OF CAPITAL ($ billions) $4 $3 BSREP II Other $2 BSREP I $1 2017 2018 2019 2020 74
Financial Update – Bryan Davis 75
1. Positioning our Balance Sheet 2. Stable and growing cash flows Office Office Retail Multifamily Retail Multifamily Multifamily 76
Accomplished our Initial Objectives 2013 Launched BPY Used BPY equity to acquire Brookfield Office Properties and 2014 converted our passive investment in Canary Wharf into a control position Raised capital through sales of interests in mature assets and developments to fund our capital commitments to: 2015 1) Active developments 2) Funds 3) Repayment of corporate debt 2016 Continued to raise capital from high demand assets and markets to redeploy into higher yielding opportunities 77
Re-shaped our Balance Sheet… BPO & Allocation Organic (US$ millions, except per unit amount) 2013 Canary of Capital Growth Today Assets Office $ 6,200 $ 6,700 $ (6,000) $ 4,900 $ 11,800 Development 1,000 2,500 3,500 Retail 7,600 1,300 8,900 Opportunistic 1,200 2,000 1,000 4,200 16,000 6,700 (1,500) 7,200 28,400 Corporate debt 500 1,500 (1,500) 1,600 2,100 Capital securities 1,250 1,250 Other liabilities 600 1,000 1,600 Equity $ 13,650 $ 5,200 $ − $ 4,600 $ 23,450 Units outstanding 1 540 241 781 Value per unit2 $ 25 $ 30 1) Reflects mandatorily convertible preferred shares as equity ($1.8 billion, 70 million units) 2) Diluted IFRS value per unit 78
Sourced the most effective capital… • Issued 173 million limited partnership units in 2014 to acquire BPO • Issued $1.8 billion of preferred units which are mandatorily convertible into 70 million BPY units to fund the privatization of Canary Wharf • In 2015 and 2016 accelerated recycling of capital to take advantage of strong market demand: Net Proceeds Cap (US$ Millions) Rate 2016 2,000+ 4.0% 2015 2,000 4.5% 2014 1,000 5.5% Total $ 5,000+ 4.5% 2017+ will start to realize significant amounts of capital from ‘first generation’ fund investments 79
…Advanced development pipeline • Completed on time and budget $1.2 billion of development and redevelopment projects and created $800+ million in value • Added $3.6 billion in projects to the active development pipeline, including: – Pipeline in Canary Wharf – Development sites in London, New York, Washington, DC, Rio de Janeiro • Invested $2 billion on advancing construction, on time and on budget • Secured over $3 billion in committed construction financings • Advanced pre-leasing by executing 3 million square feet of leases 80
Increased capital invested in Opportunistic strategies… • >$4 billion of capital invested compared to $1 billion in 2013 • Earned $110 million in FFO in Q2 2016, up 93% year over year • Diversified our cash flows by exposing us to both new geographies and real estate sectors: ($ in millions) U.S. Europe Brazil India China Total Hospitality $ 360 $ 740 $ 1,100 Multifamily 850 850 Retail 350 250 200 800 Office 200 40 240 250 730 Industrial 400 250 50 700 Triple net lease 400 400 Mezzanine 170 170 Self-storage 150 150 Student housing 150 150 Total $ 2,880 $ 1,180 $ 490 $ 250 $ 250 81
Now positioned to achieve earnings potential • Target long-term return on equity of 12-15%: ($ in millions expect per unit amounts) Capital FFO Appreciation Total Core Office and Retail $ 19,000 6% 4–6% 10–12% Opportunistic 4,500 7% 11–13% 18–20% $ 23,500 6% 6–9% 12–15% Target Earnings per unit $1.90 $2.10 $4.00 Funds attractive distribution per unit of… $1.12 and distribution growth targets between… 5–8% Provides capital to re-invest into platforms for future growth 82
Future drivers of earnings growth… • To date, we have benefited from earnings growth driven by lease-up of Brookfield Place New York and reallocation of capital to higher-returning Opportunistic strategies • Over the next 5 years, growth will be driven by three things: $2.00 Same store growth of 2-3% – $220m 9% Active developments – $160m $1.80 Reinvestment of capital at higher $1.32+ returns – $100m $1.18 $1.11 2014 2015 2016 2021 83
Conservative payout ratio + diversity of cash flows provides support for current yield $2.00 ($ per unit) $1.60 Funds from operations $ 2.00 7% Average annual realized gains 0.35 Second generation leasing costs (0.35) $1.32 $1.12 Sustaining capital expenditures (0.15) $1.18 $1.06 Annual non-cash rents (0.10) 90% 85% 80% Adjusted AFFO $1.75 2015 2016 2021 84
Conservative Financing Strategy • We finance predominantly with asset-level, non-recourse debt • We raise asset-level debt in local currency with primarily fixed interest rates • We source the lowest cost capital to fund growth • Our investment-grade corporate credit rating provides financing flexibility • We target a distribution pay-out ratio of 80% of Company FFO 85
Our long-term goal is to maintain a proportionate debt-to-capital ratio of
We target to limit floating rate debt to 25% of total • Although we may maintain higher floating rate exposure during certain periods where economic conditions and investment strategy support it ($ in millions) 38% Reduce corporate and subsidiary debt (4%) 25% Planned refinances (4%) Swap to fixed in floating rate markets (3%) Convert construction financing to permanent (2%) (13%) 87
We proactively manage foreign exchange exposures… • Finance using local currency debt which reduces exposure by 45-50% • Layer on currency hedges to reduce the exposure a further 30-40% • Leaving only 10-20% of our equity exposed to foreign currencies at any given time • Actively manage this exposure to protect equity – Brexit case study: (£ in millions) Total assets invested in U.K. £ 7,100 Local currency debt (3,400) Reduces our capital at risk prior to hedging £ 3,700 Currency hedges (2,900) Net exposure to the Pound £ 800 Reduced % of total equity exposed to Pound from 12% to …. 5% 88
Wrap-up / Q&A – Brian Kingston 89
Global reach to identify and acquire high-quality real estate on a value basis • Strong operating platforms which enables us to acquire real estate in need of leasing, capital or re-positioning, to generate core-plus returns • Extensive development pipeline assembled over time in high-value, supply- constrained markets – 10 msf of core office and multifamily developments and expected to produce +/- 15% levered returns over next 5+ years – Significant shadow pipeline, with minimal invested capital that will be well-positioned for the next development cycle • Access to opportunistic real estate returns through ability to invest in Brookfield Asset Management-sponsored real estate funds 90
BPY offers a compelling, unique combination of current yield and organic growth • Yield backed by stable and secure cash flow from a portfolio of high-quality assets • Attractive entry point at discount to IFRS value • A $23 per unit investment today has the potential to offer a very attractive return to shareholders: $ 77 $ 16 Current Yield (5-8% distribution growth) 13% $ 42 $ 38 + $7 Appreciation (Multiple of 8-11% FFO growth) $ 12 + $ 23 $ 23 $ 23 Investment (as of NYSE closing on 9/27/16) Today Year 1 Year 2 Year 5 Year 10 91
Q&A 92
Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements This presentation contains “forward-looking information” w ithin the meaning of Canadian provincial securities law s and applicable regulation and “forward looking statements” w ithin the meaning of “safe harbor” provisions of the United States Private Security Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forw ard-looking statements include statements that are predictive in nature, depend upon or refer to future events or conditions, include statements regarding our operations, business, financial condition, expected financial results, performance, prospects, opportunities, priorities, targets, goals, ongoing objectives, strategies and outlook, as w ell as the outlook for North American and international economies for the current fiscal year and subsequent periods, and include w ords such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “plans”, “believes”, “estimates”, “seeks”, “intends”, “targets”, “projects”, “forecasts”, “likely”, or negative versions thereof and other similar expressions, or future or conditional verbs such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “would” and “could”. Forw ard-looking statements include, w ithout limitation, statements about the quality of our assets and the resiliency of the cas h flow they will generate, our target distribution grow th, the performance of our assets and their potential for capital appreciation, our financial and operating objectives and strategies to achieve those objectives, our ability to recycle capital from stabilized or non-strategic assets and realize capital from our fund investments, our ability to allocate capital and capitalize on investment opportunities, the potential grow th of our business and related revenue streams, grow th to be achieved by increasing occupancy, the prospects for increasing our cash flow from c ontinued achievement of targeted returns on our investments and development and re-development pipeline, the anticipated cost and value of our development and re-development pipeline, the impact of Brexit and the energy market dow nturn on our business and the availability of financing and our financing strategy . Although w e believe that our anticipated future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements and information are based upon reasonable assumptions and expectations, the reader should not place undue reliance on forw ard-looking statements and information because they involve know n and unknow n risks, uncertainties and other factors, many of w hich are beyond our control, w hich may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from anticipated future results, performance or achievement expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements and information. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contemplated or implied by forw ard-looking statements include, but are not limited to: risks incidental to the ow nership and operation of real estate properties including local real estate conditions; the impact or unanticipated impact of general economic, political and market factors in the countries in w hich we do business; the ability to enter into new leases or renew leases on favorable terms; business competition; dependence on tenants’ financial condition; the use of debt to finance our business; the behavior of financial markets, including fluctuations in interest and foreign exchanges rates; uncertainties of real estate development or redevelopment; global equity and capital markets and the availability of equity and debt financing and refinancing w ithin these markets; risks relating to our insurance coverage; the possible impact of international conflicts and other developments including terrorist acts; potential environmental liabilities; changes in tax law s and other tax related risks; dependence on management personnel; illiquidity of investments; the ability to complete and effectively integrate acquisitions into exis ting operations and the ability to attain expected benefits therefrom; operational and reputational risks; catastrophic events, such as earthquakes and hurricanes; and other risks and f actors detailed from time to time in our documents filed w ith the securities regulators in Canada and the United States. We caution that the foregoing list of important factors that may affect future results is not exhaustive. The forward-looking statements represent our view s as of the date of this presentation and should not be relied upon as representing our view s as of any date subsequent to the date of this presentation. When relying on our forward-looking statements or information, investors and others should carefully consider the foregoing factors and other uncertainties and potential events. Except as required by law , w e undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or information, w hether written or oral, that may be as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. 93
Special Note Regarding Use of Non-IFRS Measures This presentation contains references to net operating income (“NOI”) and funds from operations (“FFO”) w hich do not have any standardized meaning prescribed by International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) and therefore may not be comparable to similar measures presented by other entities. We define FFO as income, including equity accounted income, before realized gains (losses) from the sale of investment property (except gains (losses) related to properties developed for sale) , fair value gains (losses) (including equity accounted fair value gains (losses)), depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, income tax expense (benefit), and less non-controlling interests of others in operating subsidiaries and properties. We believe that these are useful supplemental measures that may assist investors in assessing the financial performance and the cash anticipated to be generated by our business. NOI and FFO should not be considered as the sole measure of our performance and should not be considered in isolation from, or as a s ubstitute for, analysis of our financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS. See “Reconciliation of Non-IFRS Measures” in our most recent annual report on Form 20-F and our 6-K filed on August 11, 2016 for a more detailed discussion including a reconciliation to the most directly comparable IFRS measures. Additional Notes All amounts are in U.S. dollars unless otherw ise specified. Unless otherw ise indicated, the statistical and financial data in this document is presented as of June 30, 2016. 94
Brookfield Property Partners L.P. 2016 95
You can also read