B.Joseph Elmunzer, MD, MSc - Case presentation - GI2019
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Case Presentation This is a 63 year-old woman who presented to an outside hospital with chief complaint of right upper quadrant abdominal pain radiating to her back. She also reported anorexia for two days prior to her admission but denied any fever, chills, nausea, or vomiting . Upon arrival, she was initially normotensive but later became hemodynamically unstable requiring vasopressors in the intensive unit. Labs were pertinent for WBC 12, T. Bili 2.0, and ALP ~ 200s. PMH: Diabetes and Morbid Obesity PSHx: Cholecystectomy and Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
Hospital Course at the OSH Found to have Enterococcus bacteremia CT Findings: Intrahepatic and extrahepatic biliary dilation with the CBD measuring up to 1.3 cm Went to IR for cholangiogram and PTC placement Transferred to MUSC for ERCP
Hospital Course at MUSC Labs: T. Bili 1.7, AST 46, ALT 19, and ALP 256 IR exchanged her PTC and repeated cholangiogram which did not identify a stone. MRCP findings: Choledocholithiasis with a stone measuring approx. 2.5 cm within the mid common bile duct We performed an EUS-directed transgastric ERCP for stone removal
EUS-Directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Creation of gastro-gastric or jejuno-gastric tract via EUS and FNA Expand excluded stomach with contrast Establish tract with a lumen apposing metal stent Reach excluded stomach Perform standard ERCP
Sphincterotomy A. PTC drain emerging from the major papilla B. Sphincterotomy followed by dilation of the major papilla with a 12 mm balloon
Stone Removal A. Main bile duct with one large stone B. After biliary tree sweep and stone extraction
Clinical Course after EDGE She did well after the procedure. Two days later, she underwent EGD for stent removal and endoscopic closure of her jejuno-gastric fistula. A. Axios stent in the gastrostomy tract B. Defect (later closed with an over the scope clip)
What options for ERCP are available for patients with altered luminal anatomy from a Roux-en-Y gastric bypass? There are several challenges with performing an ERCP in patients with altered luminal anatomy from weight loss surgeries. It can be technically difficult to reach the major papilla due to a long Roux limb (100-200 cm), angulations, adhesions, internal hernias, and looping.
EUS-Directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Novel procedure The transgastric approach was first introduced by Baron and Vickers in 1998. Highly affective approach with patients with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass anatomy
EUS-Directed Transgastric ERCP (EDGE) Strengths: Can be performed with a single endoscopic team all within one day Technical success rate > 95 %. Limitations: Availability of the procedure (ie tertiary centers). 14 % risk of an adverse event Possible weight regain after gastrostomy tract creation
Balloon Assisted ERCP (B-ERCP) Limitations Tangential views of papilla Unstable working platform Absence of device elevator Suboptimal accessory performance due to small diameter of working channel and tortuous nature of the enteroscope Technical success rates have been reported as low as 63%
Intra-Operative ERCP A combined surgical (open or laparoscopic) and endoscopic approach The most common laparoscopic technique uses three transabdominal ports. Trocar is in the excluded stomach The duodenoscope is introduced through the surgically placed trocar.
Intra-Operative ERCP Strengths: Can use standard ERCP accessories High success rates Limitations: Costs Surgical Risks Coordinating schedules with surgeons and interventional endoscopists If repeat ERCP is needed in the future, the patient would require a gastrostomy tube
Take Home Points Rapid weight loss after gastric bypass is a risk factor for developing gallstones which can lead to choledocholithiasis or pancreatitis. There are challenges in performing an ERCP in patients who have an altered luminal anatomy after a weight loss surgery. Options for ERCP may include EDGE, balloon assisted ERCP, and intraoperative ERCP. Each procedure has its strengths and weaknesses that should be evaluated beforehand.
Questions?
You can also read