Bibliography - Elgaronline
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Bibliography
Abt Associates (2017). Analysis of the Public Health Impacts of the Regional
Greenhouse Gas Initiative, 2009–2014. Cambridge: Abt Associates.
Acadia Center (2019). The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative – Ten Years in Review.
Rockport: Acadia Center.
Adler, J (2004). ‘The Fable of Federal Environmental Regulation – Reconsidering the
Federal Role in Environmental Protection’. Case Western Reserve Law Review 55,
pp 93–113.
Akerlof, GA (2002). ‘Behavioral Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Behavior’.
American Economic Review, 92(3), pp 411–33
Altvater, E and Brunnengräber, A (2008). Ablasshandel gegen Klimawandel? –
Marktbasierte Instrumente in der globalen Klimapolitik und ihre Alternativen.
Hamburg: VSA.
Anger, N, Asane-Otoo, E, Böhringer, C and Oberndorfer, U (2015). ‘Public Interest
Versus Interest Groups: A Political Economy Analysis of Allowance Allocation
under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme’. International Environmental Agreements:
Politics, Law and Economics, 16(5), pp 621–38.
Anger, N, Böhringer, C and Oberndorfer, U (2008). Public interest vs. interest groups:
allowance allocation in the EU Emissions Trading Scheme. Mannheim: ZEW –
Centre for European Economic Research.
Asian Development Bank (2018). The Korea Emissions Trading Scheme challenge
and emerging opportunities. Manila: Asian Development Bank. www.adb.org/sites/
default/files/publication/469821/korea-emissions-trading-scheme.pdf (accessed 23
October 2020).
Australia (2015). Australia’s Intended Nationally Determined Contribution to a new
Climate Change Agreement: INDCs as communicated by Parties (INDC Submission,
11 August 2015). www4.unfccc.int/sites/submissions/indc/Submission%20Pages/
submissions.aspx (accessed 16 September 2020).
Australian Government (2008). Australia’s Low Pollution Future: The Economics of
Climate Change Mitigation. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Government (2011). Securing a Clean Energy Future: The Australian
Government’s Climate Change Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
Australian Government (2012). Australia and European Commission Agree on
Pathway towards Fully Linking Emissions Trading Systems. https://parlinfo.aph
.gov.au/parlInfo/search/display/display.w3p;query=Id%3A%22media%2Fpressrel
%2F1878248%22 (accessed 16 September 2020).
Australian Government (2013). Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory:
June Quarter 2013. www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-national
-greenhouse-gas-inventory-june-quarter-2013 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Australian Government (2014). Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June
2014. www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-national-greenhouse
-gas-inventory-june-2014 (accessed 7 September 2020).
221
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access222 Carbon markets around the globe
Australian Government (2015). Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June
2015. www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-national-greenhouse
-gas-inventory-june-2015 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Australian Government (2016). Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June
2016. www.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/australias-national-greenhouse
-gas-inventory-june-2016 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Australian Government (2017). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June 2017. www
.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/national-greenhouse-gas-inventory-june
-2017 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Australian Government (2018). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June 2018. www
.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/national-greenhouse-gas-inventory-june
-2018 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Australian Government (2019). National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: June 2019. www
.industry.gov.au/data-and-publications/national-greenhouse-gas-inventory-june
-2019 (accessed 7 September 2020).
Aydos, E (2015). ‘What went wrong? Lessons from a short-lived carbon price in
Australia’ in Ribeiro, RL, De Carli, AA and Andrade Costa, LD (eds) Tributacao e
Sustentabilidade Ambiental. Rio de Janeiro: FGV Editora, pp 75–98.
Aydos, E (2016). ‘Paris: The dilemmas of international climate change negotiations and
the role of linked Emissions Trading Schemes in the post-2020 regime’, in Stoianoff,
NP, Kreiser, L, Butcher, B, Milne, JE and Ashiabor, H (eds) Market Instruments
and the Protection of Natural Resources. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing,
pp 204–19.
Aydos, E (2017). Paying the Carbon Price: The Subsidisation of Heavy Polluters under
Emissions Trading Schemes. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Aydos, E and Rudolph, S (2018). ‘Climate Policy Made “Down Under”: The Political
Economy of a New Carbon Market in Australia’. Climate and Carbon Law Review,
12, pp 304–15.
Aydos, E, Rudolph, S and Lerch, A (2020). ‘I Know What I Must Do. It’s just! Justice
in Emissions Trading Design and the Recent Reforms in New Zealand’. Carbon &
Climate Law Review, 14, pp 118–27.
Balamiento-Lee, M (2019). SK ETS Market and Policy issue. www.ecoeye-int.com/
(accessed 30 October 2020).
Banzhaf, S, Ma, L and Timmins, C (2019). ‘Environmental Justice – The Economics of
Race, Place, and Pollution’. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33(1), pp 185–208.
Barnes, P (2001). Who Owns the Sky? Our Common Assets and the Future of
Capitalism. Washington: Island Press.
Baumol, WJ and Oates, WE (1971). ‘The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of
the Environment’. Swedish Journal of Economics, 73, pp 42–54.
Becker, GS (1983). ‘A Theory of Competition among Pressure Groups for Political
Influence’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(3), pp 371–400
Best, R, Burke, PJ and Jotzo, F (2020). ‘Carbon Pricing Efficacy: Cross-Country
Evidence’. Environmental and Resource Economics, 77, pp 64–94.
Betz, R, Sanderson, T and Ancev, T (2010). ‘In or Out: Efficient Inclusion of
Installations in an Emissions Trading Scheme?’. Journal of Regulatory Economics,
37(2), pp 162–79.
Binswanger, HC, Frisch, H and Nutzinger, HG (1983). Arbeit ohne Umweltzerstörung
– Strategien einer neuen Wirtschaftspolitik. Frankfurt: Fischer.
Black, D (1958). The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 223
Boemare, C and Quirion, P (2002). ‘Implementing Greenhouse Gas Trading in Europe’.
Ecological Economics, 43, pp 213–30.
Bonus, H (2001). ‘Vergleich von Abgaben und Zertifikaten’, in Bonus, H (ed) Kunst
der Ökonomie – Umwelt und Identität. Münster/Hamburg/London: Lit S, pp 145–59.
Bosse, F (1997). ‘Wirtschaftliche Strukturen’, in Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung
(ed) Japan. Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, pp 32–40.
Bosselmann, K (2013). ‘Grounding the Rule of Law’, in Voigt, C (ed) Rule of Law for
Nature: New Dimensions and Ideas in Environmental Law. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, pp 75–93.
Bovenberg, AL (1999). ‘Green Tax Reforms and the Double Dividend: An Updated
Reader’s Guide’. International Tax and Public Finance, 6, pp 421–43.
Boyce, JK (2018). ‘Carbon Pricing – Effectiveness and Equity’. Ecological Economics,
150, pp 52–61.
BP (2001). Klimaschutz durch Emissionshandel – Sichtweisen und Erfahrungen der
BP. Hintergrundinformationen und Thesenpapier. Hamburg: BP.
Braun, M and Santarius, T (2008). Climate Politics in the Multi-Level Governance
System (Wuppertal Papers No 172). Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute for Climate,
Environment and Energy.
Bromley, DW (1991). Environment and Economy – Property Rights and Public Policy.
Oxford/Cambridge: Blackwell.
Buchanan, JM, Tollison, RD and Tullock, G (eds) (1980). Toward a Theory of the
Rent-Seeking Society. College Station: Texas A&M Press.
Buchanan, JM and Tullock, G (1975). ‘Polluters’ Profits and Political Response –
Direct Controls versus Taxes’. American Economic Review, 1, pp 139–47.
Bund für Umwelt und Naturschutz Deutschland (2003). BUNDhintergrund
EU-Emissionshandel mit Treibhausgasen – Effizienter Umweltschutz oder kli-
mapolitische Mogelpackung. Berlin: BUND.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (2000a). Vereinbarung zwischen der Regierung
der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der deutschen Wirtschaft zur Klimavorsorge.
Berlin: BDI.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (2000b). Vereinbarung zwischen der Regierung
der Bundesrepublik Deutschland und der deutschen Wirtschaft zur Minderung der
CO2-Emissionen und der Förderung der Kraft-Wärme-Kopplung in Ergänzung zur
Klimavereinbarung vom 9.11.2000. Berlin: BDI.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (2002). Stellungnahme der deutschen Industrie
zum Richtlinien-Vorschlag für einen europaweiten Handel mit Treibhausga
s-Emissionsberechtigungen. Berlin: BDI.
Bundesverband der Deutschen Industrie (2003). Eckpunkte für die Umsetzung der
EU-Richtlinie zum Handel mit Treibhausgas-Emissionsberechtigungen. Berlin:
BDI.
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2001). Positionspapier der Bundestagsfraktion Bündnis 90/
Die Grünen: Handeln für den Klimaschutz – Emissionshandel in Deutschland
vorantreiben. Berlin: Bündnis 90/Die Grünen.
Bündnis 90/Die Grünen (2003). Beschluss Emissionshandel – Für einen ökologisch
integren und transparenten Emissionshandel. Berlin: Bündnis 90/Die Grünen.
Burghaus, K, Koch, N, Bauer, J and Edenhofer, O (2019). ‘Lobbying, relocation
risk, and allocation of free allowances in the EU ETS’, in World Bank (ed) First
International Conference on Carbon Pricing – Working Paper Series. Washington
DC: World Bank, pp 5–38.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access224 Carbon markets around the globe
Burtraw, D and Sekar, S (2013). ‘Two World Views on Carbon Revenues’. Journal of
Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, pp 110–20.
Bushnell, JB (2017). ‘(Overly) Great Expectations: Carbon Pricing and Revenue
Uncertainty in California’. National Tax Journal, 70(4), pp 837–54.
Bushnell, JB (2020). ‘The High Cost of Low Carbon Prices’, Energy Institute Blog, 15
June. https://energyathaas.wordpress.com/2020/06/15/the-high-cost-of-low-carbon
-prices/(accessed 15 June 2020).
Bushnell, JB, Chen, Y and Zaragoza-Watkins, M (2014). ‘Downstream Regulation of
CO2 Emissions in California’s Electricity Sector’. Energy Policy, 64, pp 313–23.
Bushnell, JB and Mansur, ET (2011). ‘Vertical Targeting and Leakage in Carbon
Policy’. The American Economic Review, 101(3), pp 263–67.
Butler, M (2017). Climate Wars. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
Cabinet Office of Japan (1997). Chikyu ondanka taisaku ni kansuru yoron chosa.
Tokyo: COoJ.
Cabinet Office of Japan (2001). Chikyu ondanka taisaku ni kansuru yoron chosa.
Tokyo: COoJ.
Cabinet Office of Japan (2005). Chikyu ondanka taisaku ni kansuru yoron chosa.
Tokyo: COoJ.
Cabinet Office of Japan (2007). Chikyu ondanka taisaku ni kansuru yoron chosa.
Tokyo: COoJ.
California Air Resources Board (2007). California Greenhouse Gas Inventory (millions
of metric tonnes of CO2 equivalent) — Summary by Economic Sector. Sacramento:
CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2008). Climate Change Scoping Plan – A Framework
for Change. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2010). Updated Economic Analysis of California’s
Climate Change Scoping Plan – Staff Report to the Air Resources Board. Sacramento:
CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2011). California Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Inventory – 2000–2009. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2014). First Update to the Climate Change Scoping
Plan – Building on the Framework. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2015a). Overview of ARB Emissions Trading Program.
Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2015b). 2013–2014 Full Compliance Period
Compliance Obligation Summary. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2017a). California’s 2017 Climate Change Scoping
Plan – The strategy for achieving California’s 2030 Greenhouse Gas Target.
Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2017b). Assembly Bill 398 – California Global
Warming Solutions Act: Market-based Compliance Mechanisms. Sacramento:
CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2018). 2015–2017 Full Compliance Period
Compliance Obligation Summary. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2019a). California Greenhouse Gas Emissions for
2000 to 2017 – Trends of Emissions and Other Indicators. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2019b). 2000–2017 GHG Emissions Trends Report
Data. Sacramento: CARB.
California Air Resources Board (2019c). Summary of Transfers Registered in CITSS by
California and Quebec Entities in 2019. Sacramento: CARB.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 225
California Air Resources Board (2020a): Compliance Offset Program. ww3.arb.ca.gov/
cc/capandtrade/offsets/offsets.htm (accessed 9 January 2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020b): Market Monitoring. ww2.arb.ca.gov/our
-work/programs/cap-and-trade-program/market-monitoring (accessed 23 June
2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020c). Cap-and-Trade Program Data. ww2.arb
.ca.gov/our-work/programs/cap-and-trade-program/cap-and-trade-program-data
(accessed 23 June 2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020d). California Climate Credit. www.cpuc.ca.gov/
climatecredit/(accessed 26 June 2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020e). Allowance Allocation – Overview. ww2.arb
.ca.gov/our-work/programs/cap-and-trade-program/allowance-allocation (accessed
2 November 2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020f). Compliance Offset Program. ww2.arb.ca.gov/
our-work/programs/compliance-offset-program (accessed 2 November 2020).
California Air Resources Board (2020g). Program Linkage. ww2.arb.ca.gov/our-work/
programs/cap-and-trade-program/program-linkage (accessed 2 November 2020).
California Climate Investments (2020). Annual Report to the Legislature on California
Climate Investments Using Cap-and-Trade Auction Proceeds Sacramento: CCI.
Cambridge Econometrics, Climate Strategies and Entec (2010). Assessment of the
Degree of Carbon Leakage in Light of an International Agreement on Climate
Change: A Report for the Department of Energy and Climate Change. https://assets
.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/
file/47920/471-carbon-leakage-ce-report.pdf (accessed 24 November 2020).
Capros, P and Mantzos, L (2000). The Economic Effects of EU-Wide Industry-Level
Emission Trading to Reduce Greenhouse Gases – Results from the PRIMES Energy
Systems Model. Athens: European Commission.
Carbon Pulse (2017a). China, Japan, Korea Carbon market links resurface as talks set
for next week. http://carbon-pulse.com/44890/ (accessed 23 October 2020).
Carbon Pulse (2017b). China asks for fresh CO2 data from eight targeted ETS sectors.
http://carbon-pulse.com/44858/ (accessed 27 October 2020).
Carbon Pulse (2018). Dossier: China Carbon markets. http://carbon-pulse.com/18865/
(accessed 28 October 2020).
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (2014). California Cap-and-Trade Program
Summary. Arlington: C2ES.
Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (2017). Summary of California’s Extension of
its Cap-and-Trade Program. Arlington: C2ES.
Chan, NW and Morrow, JW (2019). ‘Unintended Consequences of Cap-and-trade?
Evidence from the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative’. Energy Economics, 80, pp
411–22.
Chen, Y (2009). ‘Does a Regional Greenhouse Gas Policy Make Sense? A Case Study
of Carbon Leakage and Emissions Spillover’. Energy Economics, 31, pp 667–75.
Chen, Y, Cramton, P, List JA and Cockefels, A (2020). ‘Market Design, Human
Behavior, and Management’, Management Science: Articles in Advance, pp 1–32,
https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2020.3659 (accessed 30 November 2020).
China (2015). Enhanced Actions on Climate Change: China’s Intended Nationally
Determined Contributions. www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/
China%20First/China’s%20First%20NDC%20Submission.pdf (accessed 28
October 2020).
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access226 Carbon markets around the globe
Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (2002). Pressemitteilung – Den
Emissionshandel im Pilotprojekt testen [Press release]. 19 March.
Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (2004a). Pressemitteilung –
Schröder muss beim Emissionshandel eingreifen [Press release]. 22 March.
Christian Democratic Union/Christian Social Union (2004b). Entschließungsantrag
zu der dritten Beratung des Gesetz-entwurfs der Fraktionen SPD und Bündnis
90/Die Grünen – Entwurf eines Gesetzes über den Nationalen Zuteilungsplan für
Treibhausgas-Emissionsberechtigungen in der Zuteilungsperiode 2005 bis 2007
(Zuteilungsgesetz – NAPG). Berlin: CDU/CSU.
Clean Energy Regulator (2016). Understanding Contracts. www.cleanenergyregulator
.gov.au/ERF/Want-to-participate-in-the-Emissions-Reduction-Fund/Step-2
-Contracts-and-auctions/understanding-contracts (accessed 4 April 2016).
Clean Energy Regulator (2020a), Emissions Reduction Fund Schematic. www.
cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/ERF/About-the-Emissions-Reduction-Fund/emissions
-reduction-fund-schematic . Access 4 September 2020.
Clean Energy Regulator (2020b). Auction March. www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/
ERF/Auctions-results/march-2020 (accessed 4 September 2020).
Clean Energy Regulator (2020c). ERF Projects. www.cleanenergyregulator.gov.au/
maps/Pages/erf-projects/index.html (accessed 30 September 2020).
Clement, W (2004). Manuskript einer Rede des Bundesministers für Wirtschaft
und Arbeit Wolfgang Clement anlässlich der Handelsblatt-Jahrestagung Energie.
Berlin: BMWA.
Climate Action Network Japan (2008). Japan at a Glance. Tokyo: CAN Japan.
Climate Action Tracker (2020a). Pledges and Targets. https://climateactiontracker.org/
countries/china/pledges-and-targets/ (accessed 27 October 2020).
Climate Action Tracker (2020b). The CAT Thermometer. https://climateactiontracker
.org/global/cat-thermometer/ (accessed 30 November 2020).
Climate Action Tracker (2020c). South Korea. https://climateactiontracker.org/
countries/south-korea/(accessed 30 November 2020).
Clò, S (2011). European Emissions Trading in Practice: An Economic Analysis.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Coase, RH (1960). ‘The Problem of Social Cost’. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(1),
pp 1–44.
Commonwealth of Australia (2014). Budget Review 2014–2015. Canberra: Parliament
of Australia Research Branch.
Congressional Research Service (2019). The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative –
Background, Impacts, and Selected Issues (Updated July 16, 2019). Washington
DC: CRS.
Copeland, BR and Taylor, MS (2005). ‘Free Trade and Global Warming – A Trade
Theory View of the Kyoto Protocol’. Journal of Environmental Economics and
Management, 49(2), pp 205–34.
Corbach, M (2007). Die deutsche Stromwirtschaft und der Emissionshandel. Stuttgart:
ibidem.
Cramton, P and Kerr, S (2002). ‘Tradeable Carbon Permit Auctions: How and Why to
Auction and Not Grandfather’. Energy Policy, 30(4), pp 333–45.
Crocker, TD (1966). ‘The Structuring of Atmospheric Pollution Control Systems – The
Economics of Air Pollution’, in Wolozing, H (ed) The Economics of Air Pollution.
New York: W.W. Norton, pp 61–86.
Cullenward, D (2014). ‘Leakage in California’s Carbon Market’. The Electricity
Journal, 27(9), pp 36–48.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 227
Cullenward, D, Inman, M and Mastrandrea, MD (2019). ‘Tracking Banking in the
Western Climate Initiative Cap-and-Trade Program’. Environmental Research
Letters, 14, Article 124037, pp 1–11.
Dales, JH (1968a). ‘Land, Water, and Ownership’. Canadian Journal of Economics, 1,
pp 791–804.
Dales, JH (1968b). Pollution, Property and Prices – An Essay in Policy-Making and
Economics. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Daly, HE (1992). ‘Allocation, Distribution, and Scale: Towards an Economics that is
Efficient, Just, and Sustainable’. Ecological Economics, 6, pp 185–93.
Daly, HE (2013). ‘Top 10 Policies for a Steady-State Economy’, The Daly News,
28 October. https://steadystate.org/top-10-policies-for-a-steady-state-economy/
(accessed 18 April 2019).
Daly, HE and Farley, J (2011). Ecological Economics – Principles and Applications.
Washington DC: Island Press.
de Haan, G, Kamp, G, Lerch, A, Martignon, L, Müller-Christ, G and Nutzinger,
HG (2008). Nachhaltigkeit und Gerechtigkeit – Grundlagen und schulpraktische
Konsequenzen. Heidleberg: Springer.
Deane, F, Hamman, E and Pei, Y (2017). ‘Principles of Transparency in Emissions
Trading Schemes: The Chinese Experience’. Transnational Environmental Law,
6(1), pp 87–106.
Dellatte, J, Rudolph, S and Lerch, A (2019). ‘The Way of the Dragon: China’s New
Emissions Trading Scheme and the prospects for Linking’, in Cámara Barroso,
C and Villar Ezcurra, M (eds) Environmental Tax Studies for the Ecological
Transition. Comparative Analysis Addressing Urban Concentration and Increasing
Transport Challenges. Madrid: Thomson Reuters, pp 97–112.
Department of Climate Change (2008a). Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: Green
Paper. Canberra: Australian Government.
Department of Climate Change (2008b). Department of Climate Change, Climate
Change Carbon Pollution Reduction Scheme: White Paper. Canberra: Australian
Government.
Department of Environment (2019). Climate Solutions Package. www.environment
.gov.au/system/files/resources/bb29bc9f-8b96-4b10-84a0-46b7d36d5b8e/files/
climate-solutions-package.pdf (accessed 30 September 2020).
Deutscher Bundestag (2004a). Entwurf eines Gesetzes zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie
2003/87/EG über ein System für den Handel mit Treibhausgasemissionszertifikaten
in der Gemeinschaft – Gesetz über den Handel mit Berechtigungen zur Emission
von Treibhausgasen (Treibhausgas-Emissionshandelsgesetz – TEHG), Drucksache
15/2681. Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
Deutscher Bundestag (2004b). Gesetz über den nationalen Zuteilungsplan für
Treibhausgas-Emissionsberechtigungen in der Zuteilungsperiode 2005-2007
(Zuteilungsgesetz 2007 – ZuG 2007). Berlin: Deutscher Bundestag.
Deutscher Gewerkschaftsbund (2002). EU-weiter Emissionshandel steht im
Widerspruch zum Kyoto-Protokoll. Stuttgart: DGB.
Deutscher Industrie- und Handelstag (2002). DIHK lehnt EU-Vorschlag zum
CO2-Emissionshandel ab – Viele offene Fragen müssen ausgeräumt warden. www
.ihk-umkis.de/recht/stellungnahmen/eu_top/index.html (accessed 14 March 2003).
Didzoleit, W (2002). ‘Kanzler contra Kommissarin’. Der Spiegel, 26, p 96.
Dinguirard, F and Brookfield, P (2015). Setting the Institutional Framework for
Transaction Registry Administration: Workshop Background Paper No. 2.
Washington, DC: World Bank Partnership for Market Readiness.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access228 Carbon markets around the globe
Di Stefano, M (2017). Here’s The Audio Of Peta Credlin Admitting The Last Seven
Years Of Politics Is Based On Total Crap, BuzzFeed News, 15 February. www
.buzzfeedcom/markdistefano/whats-the-point-of-australian-politics (accessed 27
November 2020).
Dorband, I, Jakob, M, Kalkuhl, M and Steckel, JC (2019). ‘Poverty and Distributional
Effects of Carbon Pricing in Low- and Middle Income Countries – a Global
Comparative Analysis’. World Development, 115, pp 246–57.
Downs, A (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.
Downs, A (1967). Inside Bureaucracy. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.
Downs, A (1972). ‘Up and Down with Ecology’. Public Interest, 28, pp 38–50.
Dresdner Bank (2001). Emissionshandel – Die Sicht der Finanzdienstleister –
Diskussionspapier. Frankfurt: Dresdner Bank.
Dryzek, JS (2013). Politics of the Earth. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Egenhofer, C, Alessi, M, Georgiev, A and Fujiwara, N (2011). The EU Emissions
Trading System and Climate Policy towards 2050: Real incentives to reduce emis-
sions and drive innovation? Brussels: CEPS. www.ceps.eu/download/publication/
?id=6916&pdf=The%20EU%20ETS%20and%20Climate%20Policy%20towards
%202050.pdf (accessed 30 October 2020).
Ellerman, AD, Buchner, B and Carraro, C (eds) (2007). Allocation in the European
Emissions Trading Scheme: Rights, Rents and Fairness. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ellerman, AD, Convery, F and De Perthuis, C (2008). The European Carbon Market in
Action: Lessons from the First Trading Period. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Ellerman, AD, Convery, F and De Perthuis, C (2010). Pricing Carbon: The European
Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellerman, AD, Joskow, PL, Schmalensee, R, Montero, JP and Bailey, EM (2000).
Markets for Clean Air – The U.S. Acid Rain Program. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Ellerman, AD, Marcantonini, C and Zaklanz, A (2015). ‘The European Union
Emissions Trading System: Ten Years and Counting’. Review of Environmental
Economics and Policy, 10(1), pp 89–107.
Emissions Trading Working Group (2001). Aufgabenstellung der Arbeitsgruppe
Emissionshandel zur Bekämpfung des Treibhauseffektes. Berlin: AGE.
Endres, A (2011). Environmental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Endres, A and Finus, M (1996a). ‘Umweltpolitische Zielbestimmung im Spannungsfeld
gesellschaftlicher Interessengruppen – Ökonomische Theorie und Empirie’, in
Siebert, H (1996) (ed) Elemente einer rationalen Umweltpolitik – Expertisen zur
umweltpolitischen Neuorientierung. Tübingen: Mohr, pp 35–133.
Endres, A and Finus, M (1996b). ‘Zur Politischen Ökonomie der Um-weltgesetzgebung
– Umweltschutzinstrumente im politischen Prozess’. Zeitschrift für angewandte
Umweltforschung, Sonderheft 8, pp 88–103.
Energy Information Administration (2019). Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions
by State 2005–2016. Washington DC: EIA.
Enquête Kommission (1995). Mehr Zukunft für die Erde – Nachhaltige Energiepolitik
für dauerhaften Klimaschutz. Bonn: Economica.
Environmental Protection Agency (2020). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions
and Sinks 1990–2018. Washington DC: EPA.
Environmental Protection Authority (2012). The New Zealand Emissions Trading
Scheme. ETS 2012 – Facts and Figures.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 229
Environmental Protection Authority (2018). 2018 New Zealand Emissions Trading
Scheme Report. www.epa.govt.nz/assets/Uploads/Documents/Emissions-Trading
-Scheme/Reports/Annual-Reports/b450975461/2018-ETS-Annual-Report.pdf
(accessed 15 September 2020).
European Commission (2000). Green Paper on Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading
within the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/
41ab9f93-b438-41a6-b330-bb0491f6f2fd/language-en (accessed 26 October 2020).
European Commission (2005). Communication from the Commission COM/2005/703,
on Further guidance on allocation plans for the 2008 to 2012 trading period of the
EU Emission Trading Scheme.
European Commission (2011). Draft Commission decision on free allocation rules for
the emissions trading scheme: Explanatory paper prepared by DG Climate Action
for MEPs.
European Commission (2012). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament
and the Council: The State of the European Carbon Market in 2012. https://ec
.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/ets/reform/docs/com_2012_652_en.pdf (accessed
20 November 2020).
European Commission (2015), Phase 2 auctions (08 May 2015) Climate Action
http://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/pre2013/second/index_en.htm (accessed 20
November 2020).
European Commission (2018). Fossil CO2 emissions of all world countries.
Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/
publication/eur-scientific-and-technical-research-reports/fossil-co2-emissions-all
-world-countries-2018-report (accessed 30 October 2020).
European Commission (2019a). Communication from the Commission to the European
Parliament, the European Council, the Council, the European Economic and Social
Committee and the Committee of the Regions the European Green Deal 2019/640/
COM final.
European Commission (2019b). Report from the Commission to the European
Parliament and the Council, Report on the functioning of the European carbon
market. Brussels, 16 January 2020 COM(2019) 557 final/2, 22.
European Commission (2019c). Decision No 2/2019 of the Joint Committee Established
by the Agreement Between the European Union and the Swiss Confederation on the
Linking of their Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Systems of 5 December 2019.
European Commission (2019d). Report from the Commission to the European Parliament
and the Council: Report on the functioning of the European carbon market.
https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52019DC0557R(01)
(accessed 16 November 2020).
European Commission (2020a). Auctioning. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/policies/ets/
auctioning_en#tab-0-0 (accessed 25 September 2020).
European Commission (2020b). EU Green Deal (carbon border adjustment mech-
anism). https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/
12228-Carbon-Border-Adjustment-Mechanism (accessed 25 September 2020).
European Commission (2020c). Memorandum of Understanding to Enhance
Cooperation on Emissions Trading between the European Commission and the
Ministry of Ecology and Environment of the People’s Republic of China. https://
ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/news/20180713_mou_en.pdf (accessed 25
September 2020).
European Commission (2020d). International Carbon Market. https://ec.europa.eu/
clima/policies/ets/markets_en (accessed 22 October 2020).
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access230 Carbon markets around the globe
Fankhauser, S and Hepburn, C (2010). ‘Designing Carbon Markets, Part II: Carbon
Markets in Space’. Energy Policy, 38, pp 4381–87.
Fraas, A and Richardson, N (2012). ‘Banking on Allowances: The EPA’s Mixed
Record in Managing Emissions-Market Transitions’. NYU Environmental Law
Journal, 19(2), pp 303–52.
Frey, BS and Schneider, F (1978). ‘A Politico-Economic Model of the United
Kingdom’. Economic Journal, 88, pp 243–53.
Friends of the Earth Japan (2009). Make the Rule. www.maketherule.jp/dr5/ (accessed
6 July 2009).
Gan, J and McCarl, BA (2007). ‘Measuring Transnational Leakage of Forest
Conservation’. Ecological Economics, 64, pp 423–32.
Garnaut, R (2008). The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report. Melbourne:
Cambridge University Press.
Gerhards, J (ed) (2000). Die Vermessung kultureller Unterschiede – USA und
Deutschland im Vergleich. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
German Advisory Council on Climate Change (2009). Solving the Climate Dilemma –
The Budget Approach. Berlin: WBGU.
German Environment Agency (2000). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2004 –
Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: UBA.
German Environment Agency (2002). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2004 –
Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: UBA.
German Environment Agency (2004). Umweltbewusstsein in Deutschland 2004 –
Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Bevölkerungsumfrage. Berlin: UBA.
Germanwatch (2001a). Voraussetzungen für die Glaubwürdigkeit und Akzep-tanz
des Emissionshandels. Speech manuskript Fachgespräch Emissionshandel bei der
Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Umweltfragen [Speech]. Berlin, 28 November.
Germanwatch (2001b). Pressemitteilung – BASF und VCI lassen Arbeitsgemeinschaft
Emissionshandel platzen [Press release]. 14 December.
Germanwatch (2002). Emissionshandel – Ein starkes Instrument mit großen Risiken.
INKOTA-Brief 122. Berlin: Germanwatch.
Germanwatch (2004). Debatte um Emissionshandel. https://germanwatch.org/en/node/
2385 (accessed 2 February 2004).
Gilbert, A, Blinde, P, Lam, L and Blyth, W (2014b). Cap-Setting, Price Uncertainty
and Investment Decisions in Emissions Trading Systems. Oxford: Oxford Energy
Associates; Utrecht: Ecofys.
Gilbert, A, Lam, L, Sachweh, C, Smith, M, Taschini, L and Kollenberg, S (2014a).
Assessing Design Options for a Market Stability Reserve in the EU ETS. London:
Ecofys.
Gold Standard (2020). Gold Standard. www.goldstandard.org/(accessed 18 December
2020).
Goulder, LH (1995). ‘Environmental Taxation and the “Double Dividend”: A Reader’s
Guide’. International Tax and Public Finance, 2, pp 157–84.
Government of Japan (2006). Japan’s Seventh National Communication under the
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Tokyo: GoJ.
Government of Japan (2008). Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan (totally
revised). Tokyo: GoJ.
Granados, JAT and Spash, CL (2019). ‘Policies to Reduce CO2 Emissions – Fallacies
and Evidence from the United States and California’. Environmental Science and
Policy, 94, pp 262–66.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 231
Grattam Institute (2015). Submission to the Department of the Environment,
Consultation Paper ‘Emissions Reduction Fund: Safeguard Mechanism’.
Greenhouse Gas Inventory and Research Centre (2017). Current status of the
Korean ETS. Seoul. www.thepmr.org/system/files/documents/PMR_Country
%20presentation_20%20Mar%202017_EN_final_revisedpdf (accessed 30 October
2020).
Gulbrandsen, LH, Wettestad, J, Victor, DG and Underdal, A (2018). ‘The Political
Root of Divergence in Carbon Market Design – Implication for Linking’. Climate
Policy, 19(4), pp 427–38.
Hahn, RW (1987). ‘Jobs and Environmental Quality – Some Implications for Instrument
Choice’. Policy Sciences, 20, pp 289–306.
Hahn, RW and Hester, GL (1989). ‘Where Did All the Markets Go? Analysis of EPA’s
Emissions Trading’. Yale Journal on Regulation, 6, pp 109–53.
Handelsblatt (2003a). Energiegipfle beim Kanzler – Clement will Trittin ausbooten.
www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/energiegipfel-beim-kanzler-clement
-will-trittin-ausbooten/2264864.html (accessed 22 November 2003).
Handelsblatt (2003b). Neuer Energiegipfel – Jetzt darf auch Trittin mit an den Tisch.
www.handelsblatt.com/politik/deutschland/neuer-energiegipfel-jetzt-darf-auch
-trittin-mit-an-den-tisch/2270100.html (accessed 23 November 2003).
Hansjürgens, B (2010). Emissions Trading for Climate Policy: US and European
Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hansjürgens, B and Fromm, O (1994). ‘Erfolgsbedingungen von Zertifikatelösungen
in der Umweltpolitik – am Beispiel der Novelle des U.S.-Clean Air Act von 1990’.
Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 4, pp 473–505.
Hansjürgens, B and Lübbe-Wolf, G (eds) (2000). Symbolische Umweltpolitik. Frankfurt:
Suhrkamp.
Heister, J and Michaelis, P (1991). Umweltpolitik mit handelbaren Emissionsrechten
– Möglichkeiten zu Verringerung der Kohlendioxid- und Stickoxidemissionen.
Tübingen: Mohr.
Helmstädter, E (1997). ‘Über die Gerechtigkeit gerechter Regeln’, in Held, M (ed).
Normative Grundfragen der Ökonomik. Frankfurt: Campus.
Hibbard, PJ, Tierney, SF, Darling, PG and Cullinan, S (2018). ‘An Expanding Carbon
Cap-and-trade Regime? A Decade of Experience with RGGI Charts a Path Forward’.
The Electricity Journal, 31, pp 1–8.
Herder-Dorneich, P (1959). Politisches Modell zur Wirtschaftstheorie. Freiburg: Franz
Goerlich.
Herzog, T, Baumert, KA and Pershing, J (2006). Target-intensity: An Analysis of
Greenhouse Gas Intensity Targets. Washington DC: World Resources Institute.
Hintermann, B (2009). Allowance price drivers in the first phase of the EU ETS – CEPE
Working Paper, 24. Zürich: CEPE.
Holzinger, K (1987). Umweltpolitische Instrumente aus Sicht der staatlichen
Bürokratie: Versuch der Anwendung der Ökonomischen Theorie der Bürokratie.
Munich: Ifo-Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.
Horbach, J (1992). Neue Politische Ökonomie und Umweltpolitik. Frankfurt/New York:
Campus.
Huber, BR (2013). ‘How Did RGGI Do It? Political Economy and Emissions
Auctions’. Ecology Law Quarterly, 40, pp 59–106.
Imura, H (2005a). ‘Japan’s Environmental Policy – Past and Future’, in Imura, H and
Schreurs, MA (eds) Environmental Policy in Japan. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar
Publishing, pp 49–85.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access232 Carbon markets around the globe
Imura, H (2005b). ‘Japan’s Environmental Policy – Institutions and the Interplay
of Actors’, in Imura, H and Schreurs, MA (eds) Environmental Policy in Japan.
Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp 15–48.
Independent Emissions Market Advisory Committee (2018). 2018 Annual Report of the
Independent Emission Market Advisory Committee. Sacramento: IEMAC.
Industriegewerkschaft Bergbau, Chemie, Erden (2002). Pressemitteilung – Studie lehnt
Emissionshandelsvorschläge der EU ab – Große ökonomische und soziale Schäden
bei nur geringem ökologischen Nutzen [Press release]. 30 March.
Inman, M (2020). Holding Limits Don’t Constrain Banking in California’s
Cap-and-Trade Program. www.nearzero.org/wp/2018/12/13/holding-limits-dont
-constrain-banking-in-californias-cap-and-trade-program/ (accessed 11 June 2020).
International Carbon Action Partnership (2019). The use of auction revenues from emis-
sions trading systems – Delivering environmental, economic, and social benefits.
Berlin: ICAP.
International Carbon Action Partnership (2020a). Korea Emissions Trading Scheme.
https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&
layout=list&systems%5B%5D=47 (accessed 23 October 2020).
International Carbon Action Partnership (2020b). China National ETS. https://
icapcarbonaction.com/en/?option=com_etsmap&task=export&format=pdf&layout
=list&systems%5B%5D=55 (accessed 27 October 2020).
International Carbon Action Partnership (2020c). Emissions Trading Worldwide
– Status Report 2020. Berlin: ICAP. https://icapcarbonaction.com/en/icap-status
-report-2020 (accessed 30 October 2020).
International Carbon Action Partnership (2020d). Allowance Price Explorer. https://
icapcarbonaction.com/en/ets-prices (accessed 19 November 2020).
International Energy Agency (2018). CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2018
Highlights. Paris: IEA.
International Energy Agency (2020). Implementing Effective Emissions Trading
Systems: Lessons from International Experiences. Paris: IEA.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2001). TAR Climate Change 2001
Synthesis Report – Summary for Policy Makers. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar3/syr/
(accessed 30 November 2020).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007a). Climate Change 2007:
Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report
of the Inter-governmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2007b). Climate Change 2007 Synthesis
Report – Summary for Policymakers. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar4/syr/ (accessed 30
November 2020).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2013). Climate Change 2013 – The
Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment
Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/
wg1/(accessed 29 October 2020).
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C. www
.ipcc.ch/sr15/chapter/spm/ (accessed 29 October 2020).
Jaeger, WK (2013). ‘The Double Dividend Debate’, in Milne, JE and Andersen, MS
(eds) Handbook of Research on Environmental Taxation. Cheltenham: Edward
Elgar Publishing, pp 211–29.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 233
Jänicke, M (1996). ‘Erfolgsbedingungen von Umweltpolitik’, in Jänicke, M (ed)
Umweltpolitik der Industrieländer – Entwicklungen, Bilanz, Erfolgsbedingungen.
Berlin: Edition Sigma.
Jänicke, M, Kunig, P and Stitzel, M (2000). Lern- und Arbeitsbuch Umweltpolitik –
Politik, Recht und Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen.
Bonn: Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung.
Jänicke, M, Kunig, P and Stitzel, M (2003). Umweltpolitik – Politik, Recht und
Management des Umweltschutzes in Staat und Unternehmen. Bonn: Dietz.
Japan Productivity Center (2010). The Internet Survey on Global Warming. www.jpc
-net.jp/eng/research/2010_04.html (accessed 15 July 2010).
Japan for Sustainability (2010). Public Says Japan Should Move Quickly on Climate
Change. www.japanfs.org/en/pages/029702.html (accessed 23 February 2010).
Jensen, MC and Meckling, WH (1976). ‘Theory of the Firm – Managerial Behavior,
Agency Costs and Ownership Structure’. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), pp
305–60.
Jotzo, F and Pezzey, JCV (2007). ‘Optimal Intensity Targets for Greenhouse Gas
Emissions Trading under Uncertainty’. Environmental and Resource Economics,
38(2), pp 259–84.
Kahneman, D, Knetsch, JL and Thaler, R (1986). ‘Fairness as a Constraint on Profit
Seeking’. American Economic Review, 75, pp 728–41.
Kameyama, Y (2019). Climate Change Policy in Japan. London/New York: Routledge.
Kanbur, R and Shue, H (eds) (2019). Climate Justice – Integrating Economics and
Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keidanren (2008). Basic Standpoint on Climate Change Negotiations at the G8
Hokkaido Toyako Summit. Tokyo: Keidanren.
Keidanren (2010). Achieving a Low Carbon Society of Global Scale. Tokyo: Keidanren.
Kiko Network (2008). The NGO Approach towards a Low Carbon Society. Kyoto:
Kiko Network.
Kim, E (2016). ‘The Politics of Climate Change Policy Design in Korea’. Environmental
Politics, 25(3), pp 454–74.
Kim, YG and Lim, JS (2014). ‘An Emissions Trading Scheme Design for Power
Industries Facing Price Regulation’. Energy Policy, 75, pp 84–90.
Kingdon, JW (1995). Agendas, Alternatives and Public Policies. New York:
HarperCollins.
Kirchgässner, G (1991). Homo Oeconomicus – das ökonomische Modell individuellen
Verhaltens und seine Anwendung in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften.
Tübingen: Mohr.
Kirchgässner, G and Schneider, F (2003). ‘On the Political Economy of Environmental
Policy’. Public Choice, 115(3), pp 369–96.
Kirk, A (2011). ‘Woodside wants LNG exempt from carbon tax’, ABC News, 11 April.
www.abc.net.au/am/content/2011/s3187564.htm (accessed 11 April 2011).
Kling, C and Rubin, J (1997). ‘Bankable Permits for the Control of Environmental
Pollution’. Journal of Public Economics, 64(1), pp 101–15.
Klinsky, S (2015). ‘Justice and Boundary Setting in Greenhouse Gas Cap and Trade
Policy – A Case Study of the Western Climate Initiative’. Annals of the Association
of American Geographers, 105(1), pp 105–22.
Kolshus, HH and Torvanger, A (2005). Analysis of EU Member States’ National
Allocation Plans. Oslo: CICERO.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access234 Carbon markets around the globe
Kraus, K and Konrad O (2009). ‘Wie fair ist fair genug? Zwei Klimakonzepte im
Vergleich’, Böll-Thema, Magazin der Heinrich Böll Stiftung: Klimawandel und
Gerechtigkeit, Ausgabe 2, pp 33–35.
Krebs, A (ed) (2000). Gleichheit oder Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Lamnek, S and Krell, C (2016). Qualitative Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Beltz.
Legislative Analyst’s Office (2017). Cap-and-Trade Extension – Issues for Legislative
Oversight. Sacramento: LAO.
Legislative Analyst’s Office (2019). Assessing California’s Climate Policies.
Sacramento: LAO.
Legislative Analyst’s Office (2020). Assessing California’s Climate Policies –
Electricity Generation. Sacramento: LAO.
Leining, C, Ormsby, J and Kerr, S (2017). Evolution of the New Zealand Emissions
Trading Scheme: Linking. Wellington: Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
Lerch, A (2011). ‘CO2-Emissionshandel – effizient oder gerecht?’. Zeitschrift für
Sozialökonomie, 48 (170/171), pp 39–47.
Liberal-Democratic Party (2004a). Pressemitteilung – FDP fordert Klarheit beim
Emissionshandel [Press release]. 5 March.
Liberal-Democratic Party (2004b). Pressemitteilung – Tohuwabohu beim
Emissionshandel beenden [Press release]. 17 March.
Liberal-Democratic Party (2004c). Pressemitteilung – Potential des Emissionshandels
optimal nutzen . [Press release]. 29 March.
Lo Prete, C, Tyagi, A and Hohl, C (2017). ‘California’s Cap-and-Trade Program and
Emission Leakage – An Empirical Analysis’. Paper presented at the 35th USAEE/
IAEE North American Conference, 14 November 2017, Houston, USA.
Locke, J (2003). Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration.
New Haven: Yale University Press.
Lohmann, L (2008). ‘Carbon Trading, Climate Justice and the Production of Ignorance
– Ten Principles’. Development, 51, pp 359–65.
Lyons, K (2019a). ‘“Our people are dying”: Australia’s climate confrontation in
the Pacific’, The Guardian, 18 August. www.theguardian.com/world/2019/aug/18/
our-people-are-dying-australias-climate-confrontation-in-the-pacific (accessed 16
September 2020).
Lyons, K (2019b). ‘Former Tuvalu PM says he was “stunned” by Scott Morrison’s
behaviour at Pacific Islands Forum’, The Guardian, 23 October. www.theguardian
.com/australia-news/2019/oct/23/former-tuvalu-pm-says-he-was-stunned-by-scott
-morrisons-behaviour-at-pacific-islands-forum (accessed 16 September 2020).
Maier-Rigaud, G (1994). Umweltpolitik mit Mengen und Märkten. Lizenzen als konsti-
tuierendes Element einer ökologischen Marktwirtschaft. Marburg: Metropolis.
March, S (2019). ‘Will We Make It?’, ABC News, 2 April. www.abc.net.au/news/2019
-04-01/is-australia-on-track-to-meet-its-paris-emissions-targets/10920500 (accessed
7 September 2020).
Markussen, P and Svendsen, GT (2005). ‘Industry Lobbying and the Political Economy
of GHG Trade in the European Union’. Energy Policy, 33(2), pp 245–55.
Marx, K (2016). ‘Kritik des Gothaer Programms’, in Lhotzky, K (ed) Marx, Karl und
Engels. Friedrich: Gesammelte Werke; Cologne: Anaconda.
Mastrandrea, MD, Inman, M and Cullenward, D (2020). ‘Assessing California’s
Progress Toward its 2020 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Limit’. Energy Policy, 138,
Article 111219, pp 1–11.
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessBibliography 235
Meyer, S (1996). Ökonomische Theorie der Umweltpolitik – der Erklärungsert der
Neuen Politischen Ökonomie für umweltpolitische Entscheidungsprozesse. Bergisch
Gladbach/Cologne: Josef Eul.
Michaelis, P (1996). Ökonomische Instrumente in der Umweltpolitik – eine anwend-
ungsorientierte Einführung. Heidelberg: Physica.
Ministry of Ecology and Environment (2020). Notice of Public Consultation on
the ‘National Measures for the Administration of Carbon Emissions Trading
(Trial)’ (Draft for Consultation) and the ‘Administrative Measures for the
Settlement of National Carbon Emission Rights Registration and Trading (Trial)’
(for Consultation). www.mee.gov.cn/xxgk2018/xxgk/xxgk06/202011/t20201102
_805822.html (accessed 18 November 2020).
Ministry for Economic Affairs and Labour (2003). Neue Energieversorgungsstruktur
unter Einbeziehung der erneuerbaren Energien – Eckpunkte. Internal strategy paper,
unpublished Berlin: BMWA.
Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety (2003a).
Nutzung von Emissionszertifikaten. Speech Manuscript for the informative event
‘Stand der nationalen Umsetzung von CDM und JI in Deutschland’. Berlin: BMU.
Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety (2003b).
Neue Energieversorgungsstruktur unter Einbeziehung der erneuerbaren Energien –
Eckpunktepapier. Internal strategy paper, unpublished. Berlin: BMU.
Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety (2004a).
Nationaler Allokationsplan für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland – Entwurf des
BMU. Berlin: BMU.
Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety (2004b).
Nationaler Allokationsplan für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland 2005–2007. Berlin:
BMU.
Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservancy and Nuclear Safety/Ministry
of Economics and Labour (2003). Interne Gesprächsrunde über den Nationalen
Allokationsplan – Ergebnisvermerk. Internal decision minutes, unpublished. Berlin:
BMU/BMWA.
Ministry for the Environment and the Treasury (2007). The Framework for
a New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/
Framework-emissions-trading-scheme-sep07.pdf (accessed 30 October 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2011a). A Guide to Landfill Methane in the New Zealand
Emissions Trading Scheme.
Ministry for the Environment (2011b). Doing New Zealand’s Fair Share. Emissions
Trading Scheme Review 2011: Final Report. www.mfe.govt.nz/publications/
climate-change/doing-new-zealands-fair-share-emissions-trading-scheme-review
-2011final (accessed 30 October 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2012a). New Zealand Government, Energy’s obliga-
tions: Reporting emissions and surrendering NZUs (3 December 2012) Climate
Change Information. www.climatechange.govt.nz/emissions-trading-scheme/
participating/energy/obligations/index.html (accessed 20 January 2013).
Ministry for the Environment (2012b). Regulations banning the use of certain inter-
national units in the ETS (17 December 2012) Climate Change Information. www
.climatechange.govt.nz/emissions-trading-scheme/building/regulatory-updates/
restricting-cers.html (accessed 20 January 2013).
Ministry for the Environment (2012c). Updating the New Zealand Emissions Trading
Scheme (Consultation document, New Zealand Government, April 2012).
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free access236 Carbon markets around the globe
Ministry for the Environment (2016). The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme
Evaluation 2016. www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/default/files/media/Climate%20Change/
ets-evaluation-report.pdf (accessed 4 June 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2019). About the New Zealand Emissions Trading
Scheme. www.mfe.govt.nz/climate-change/new-zealand-emissions-trading-scheme/
about-nz-ets (accessed 9 September 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2020a). Emissions reduction targets and emissions
budgets in the New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme. www.mfe.govt.nz/
reforming-nzets-emissions-reduction-targets-and-emissions-budgets (accessed 10
September 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2020b). New Zealand’s Greenhouse Gas Inventory:
Fulfilling reporting requirements under the United Nations Framework Convention
on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, v 1, Ch 1–15. www.mfe.govt.nz/sites/
default/files/media/Climate%20Change/new-zealands-greenhouse-gas-inventory
-1990-2018-vol-1.pdf (accessed 4 June 2020).
Ministry for the Environment (2020c). Auctioning in the New Zealand Emissions
Trading Scheme. www.mfe.govt.nz/reforming-nzets-auctioning (accessed 9
September 2020).
Ministry of the Environment (2009). Current Status of the Emissions Trading Scheme
in Japan. Tokyo: MOE.
Ministry of Strategy and Finance of the Republic of Korea (2014). First Master plan
for 2015–2014 and Second Master plan for 2021–2021 of the Korean ETS. Seoul.
www.moef.go.kr/nw/nes/detailNesDtaView.do?menuNo=4010100&searchBbsId1
=MOSFBBS_000000000028&searchNttId1=OLD_4020294 (accessed 23 October
2020).
Montgomery, WD (1972). ‘Markets in Licenses and Efficient Pollution Control
Programs’. Journal of Economic Theory, 5(3), pp 395–418.
Mueller DC (2003). Public Choice III – A Handbook. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Munasinghe, M (1992). ‘Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development’.
Paper presented at the UN Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro.
Murray, BC and Maniloff, PT (2015). ‘Why have Greenhouse Emissions in RGGI
States Declined? An Econometric Attribution to Economic, Energy Market, and
Policy Factors’. Energy Economics, 51, pp 581–89.
Nash, JR (2000). ‘Too Much Market? Conflict Between Tradable Pollution Allowances
and the “Polluter Pays” Principle’. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 24, pp 445,
469.
National Development and Reform Commission (2014). Interim Measures for the
Administration of Carbon Emission Permit Trading. http://en.pkulaw.cn/display
.aspx?cgid=3bd82d2e15823813bdfb&lib=law (accessed 27 October 2020).
National Development and Reform Commission (2015). The Issuance of the Third
Instalment of 10 Industries and Enterprises Greenhouse Gas Accounting Methods
and Reporting Guidelines. www.ndrc.gov.cn/gzdt/201511/t20151111_758288.html
(accessed 6 July 2020).
National Development and Reform Commission (2017a). Circular on publishing the
‘Program for the Establishment of a National Carbon Emissions Trading Market
(Power Generation Industry)’. https://chinaenergyportal.org/en/national-carbon
-emissions-trading-market-establishment-program-power-generation-industry/
(accessed 27 October 2020).
Sven Rudolph and Elena Aydos - 9781839109096
Downloaded from Elgar Online at 11/12/2021 05:22:11PM
via free accessYou can also read
