Alcohol and older people - ALCOHOL AND SOCIETY 2019 - IOGT-NTO
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Alcohol and older people O L A ND ALCOH T Y 2 0 19 SOCIE A SURVEY OF INTERNATIONAL AND SWEDISH RESEARCH
The Swedish Society of Medicine, Swedish Society of Nursing and IOGT-NTO are voluntary organisations independent of commercial interests. The Swedish Society of Medicine is the scientific organisation of the Swedish medical profession and has a broad range of interests across the entire field of medicine. The importance of lifestyle to people’s health at both individual and societal level, is a priority issue. The Swedish Society of Nursing is a nonprofit organization and a forum for discussing and developing nursing care by promoting nursing research, ethics, education and quality in nursing. IOGT-NTO focuses on the effects of alcohol and narcotics on individuals and society, but is also engaged in broad social and club activities. CERA is an interdisciplinary and collaborative centre for education and research into hazardous use, abuse and addiction at Gothenburg University – which works to strengthen and develop research and education in the field of addiction, and to disseminate scientific expertise to people working professionally in the field of abuse and addiction, and other interested parties. Suggested citation: ”Andreasson S, Chikritzhs T, Dangardt F, Holder H, Naimi T, Stockwell T (2019) Alcohol and Society 2019: Alcohol and the Elderly, Stockholm: Swedish Society of Medicine, Swedish Society of Nursing, CERA & IOGT-NTO.” Published by IOGT-NTO, the Swedish Society of Medicine, Swedish Society of Nursing and CERA in cooperation with Stiftelsen Ansvar, 2019 A Swedish language version of this report is also available from www.iogt.se, www.sls.se, www.swenurse.se or cera.gu.se. © IOGT-NTO & Swedish Society of Medicine & Swedish Society of Nursing & CERA, 2019 Graphic design: Petra Handin, Poppi Design Printers: Fridholm och Partners, Hindås ISBN: 978-91-982220-3-6 URN: urn:nbn:se:iogt-2019-aos-en CENTRUM FÖR UTBILDNING OCH FORSKNING KRING RISKBRUK, MISSBRUK OCH BEROENDE (CERA)
FOREWORD Foreword Alcohol consumption and alcohol-relat- alcohol policy measures, and offer recommen- ed harm, whether in the form of chronic dations for guideline alcohol consumption disease or acute harm, has increased levels for the elderly. amongst Sweden’s elderly in recent years. The Swedish Society of Medicine, the The percentage of the population classified University of Gothenburg’s Center for as elderly has increased and will continue Education and Research on Addiction to do so. Prevention of disease and harm, (CERA), the Swedish Society of Nursing, the including alcohol-related disease and harm, “Ansvar för Framtiden” [Responsibility for the is, therefore, very important – both for all Future] Foundation, and IOGT-NTO issue an those at risk and for the health and medical annual research report entitled “Alcohol and care sector. Society”, with the aim of highlighting what science has to teach us about the effects The report addresses the elderly’s increased of alcohol consumption on individuals and sensitivity to the effects of alcohol which, in society. This is the sixth such report. Previous combination with the ageing process, may in- years’ reports have focused on such issues as crease the risk of disease and accidents, even alcohol and young adults, the effects of low at relatively low consumption levels. It de- dose consumption, alcohol’s second-hand scribes the relationship between alcohol and harm, alcohol and violence, and alcohol- various diseases and problems from which related cancers. These reports, together with the elderly may suffer, such as cardiovascu- this year’s edition, are all available on our lar disease, diabetes, dementia, and cancer. respective websites. The report also highlights the significance of Alcohol consumption by the elderly is lifetime lifestyles for health in old age. often unremarked by the health and medi- The report’s authors comprise some of cal sector. It is our hope that this report can the world’s leading, international alcohol help increase awareness of this issue, both researchers, headed by Harold Holder. The amongst medical and healthcare personnel, researchers have collated and aggregated and amongst other interested parties, and facts and figures from international studies in that it both provokes interest and stimulates the field and evaluated the scientific strength discussion. of the results, and both describe the role of Claudia Fahlke Britt Skogseid Ami Hommel Johnny Mostacero director, chair, chair, chair, CERA, University Swedish Society Swedish Society IOGT-NTO of Gothenburg of Medicine of Nursing
KAPITELHUVUD EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Executive summary In Sweden, as in most of the developed Risks from alcohol-related harms arise world, older people comprise an increasing from both chronic exposure as the result proportion of the population. For this sub- of cumulative consumption over time (e.g., group, the aging process in general increas- liver cirrhosis), and acute impairment from es risks to health, safety, and quality of life heavy drinking episodes (e.g., falls and motor and, as a result, older persons account for a vehicle crashes). Although many think of substantial burden of health care problems alcohol-related conditions as being caused and health-related costs in Sweden, as in only by very heavy drinking or drinking to most countries. the point of severe intoxication, there has been a growing recognition that lower levels While consuming alcohol can add to the of consumption, either in aggregate or on a health and safety risks of any age group, per-occasion basis, can cause health, safety, these risks are increased for the older popu- and social problems, especially for older lation. Typically, older people drink less than persons. younger age people which may lead to the improper conclusion that they have less risk • Heavy drinking either on average or associated with alcohol. However, in reality per-occasion (i.e. binge drinking) increas- the interaction of greater susceptibility to es the risk of almost all alcohol-related alcohol’s effects and the greater health risks diagnoses, e.g., cardiovascular disease, associated with aging combine to actually liver cirrhosis or alcohol use disorder, and increase the risks of alcohol-related harm certain cancers. among older people. For example, decreas- es in body mass associated with aging can • Even drinking lower amounts of alcohol result in higher blood alcohol concentration by older persons has some risk. For (BAC) for older persons from consuming a example, the risk of some cancers begins fixed quantity of alcohol. In addition, chang- to increase with any consumption. Older es in liver metabolism, slower reaction time persons have increased risk of car crashes and taking multiple chronic medications may at very low BAC levels, and are more further increase both BACs and the risk of likely to incur severe injury and death than experiencing negative alcohol-related effects younger persons. from a given BAC. 4 A L C O H O L A N D O L D E R PEO PLE
EXECUTIVE KAPITELHUVUD SUMMARY • In Sweden, alcohol consumption has to drink would be improved by reducing increased among older persons over their consumption, either overall or during the past 14 years in absolute terms and days in which alcohol is consumed. Among relative to other age groups, and deaths those who drink, the lowest level of risk is attributed to alcohol have increased one standard Swedish drink per day (12 among older Swedes. grams of pure alcohol) or less on average and no more than 2 drinks on any one day. • Heavy drinking is the strongest modifiable risk factor for dementia onset. Although • Those who don’t drink or who drink While consum- most non-randomized studies suggest that infrequently should not begin to drink, low-volume drinking may reduce the risk of reinitiate drinking, or drink more frequently ing alcohol dementia, higher quality research using in order to achieve claimed health benefits. can add to advanced medical MRI brain scans, genetic randomization studies, and experimental In addition, no consumption is generally preferable among those with liver disease, the health and animal studies suggest that there is likely peptic ulcer disease, who take psychoactive safety risks of no protective effect of even low-volume or sedating medications, are driving, have any age group, consumption on cognition. cognitive difficulties, a history of falls or poor balance or cardiac arrhythmias. these risks are • There are a variety of public policy inter- increased for ventions that can reduce excessive alcohol use and reduce alcohol-related harms. • On balance, alcohol is an unhealthy sub- stance in which harms from heavy use is the older These include maintaining government considerable and supported by a robust population. monopoly systems, increasing the price of base of scientific evidence. Even ‘mod- alcohol (e.g., taxation, minimum pricing), erate’ use has some risks, particularly in decreasing the physical availability of alco- older persons, and the evidence for health hol (e.g., limiting the number of outlets), protection has eroded in recent years such and restricting alcohol advertising. that we conclude: In many ways moderate drinking may be a sign but not a cause of • The level of alcohol consumption with the good health. lowest health risk is zero. However, the health of most older persons who continue ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOP L E 5
KAPITELHUVUD Authors Sven Andreasson Harold Holder Karolinska Institutet, Department of Senior Scientist Emeritus and former Public Health Sciences, Stockholm, Director of Prevention Research Sweden Center, Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation, Berkely, CA, USA Tanya Chikritzhs Timothy Naimi Curtin University, National Drug Boston Medical Center, Section on Research Institute, Perth, Australia General Internal Medicine, Boston, MA, USA Frida Dangardt Tim Stockwell Sahlgrenska Academy and University Dept of Psychology, Canadian Institute Hospital, The Queen Silvia Children´s for Substance Use Research, University Hospital – Paediatric Clinical of Victoria, BC, Canada Physiology, Gothenburg, Sweden 6 A L C O H O L A N D O L D E R PEO PLE
1 INTRODUCTION 1 Alcohol and older people – an introduction The average age of the world population is ipalities and counties has substantially in- rising. It is expected that the percentage of creased along with higher medical care costs, the world’s population over 60 years of age constituting a greater challenge for health will double by 2050.1 Within Sweden the pop- care and social services.2 ulation older than 65 is expected to rise from Against this backdrop of increasing 1.9 million in 2015 to 2.4 million in 2030, a numbers of older people in Sweden requir- 26% increase.2 Swedish life expectancy has ing more health services, the use of alcohol increased by 2.5 years, to 82.2 years, between among older people also calls for special at- 2000 and 2015 with women at the age of 65 tention. While alcohol consumption mostly is expected to live 21.5 years longer and men at a lower level than among younger genera- 18.9 years longer.3 tions, this still is of special concern, given the As a natural consequence of aging, the growing susceptibility of older people to both human body becomes more vulnerable to the acute and chronic effects of alcohol. disease. Furthermore, sight, hearing and The purpose of this report is to review the cognitive processing all decline. Older people health and social effects of alcohol among have a higher risk of disability and death older persons generally, and in Sweden in from all major diseases, such as heart disease, particular. By ‘older’ persons, we are broadly stroke, chronic respiratory disorders, cancer referring to those aged 55 years and older, and dementia. With increased longevity, cer- although we have a particular focus on those tain diseases have increased considerably. For aged 65 or older, which is the more conven- example, new cases of cancers in the 65 to 85 tional definition of the onset of old age. In year group more than doubled between 1970 addition, for conditions that predominantly and 2016. Expressed as new cancer cases affect older persons (e.g., stroke) we draw on per 100 000, cancer incidence has increased studies of the general population. In this re- almost 50%.4 port we discuss alcohol use and alcohol-relat- In addition to chronic illness and health ed mortality outcomes among older persons issues the incidence of acute harm among in the Swedish population, describe the physi- older age groups has increased. 5 Acute harms ologic effects of alcohol on older persons, include falls and other unexpected accidents, describe relationships between alcohol con- violence and mistreatment.Thus, on average, sumption and a variety of health outcomes in the personal risk of mortality and morbidity older persons, outline the implications of this rises as a person ages. In Sweden, even as increased susceptibility to alcohol’s effects mortality has decreased among the older age among older people, describe prevention and groups, years lived with disease has increased policy responses, and make recommendations in absolute numbers.5 As a result, the number for low-risk drinking for older persons who of older people receiving care from munic- consume alcohol. ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOP L E 7
KAPITELHUVUD 2 Increased susceptibility Physiological changes due to ageing result in illness or injury when even relatively small older people becoming increasingly suscepti- amounts are consumed. ble to both the acute and longer term effects Ageing is usually associated with a reduced of alcohol consumption. These physiological capacity of the liver to metabolise alcohol, changes include reduced muscle mass and re- due to reduced activity of the enzyme alcohol duced water in the body to dilute the damag- dehydrogenase, which breaks down alcohol. ing effects of alcohol on human tissue. These This does not affect blood alcohol levels to the changes that occur in the older body result in same extent as the changes in muscle mass higher and longer lasting blood alcohol con- however. centrations (BACs) than would occur for the same quantity of ethanol intake by younger 2.2 Impacts on stress hormones drinkers. Exposure to alcohol activates the hypotha- lamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) system, result- 2.1 Reduced body water ing in increased levels of cortisol in a dose-re- With increased age muscle mass is reduced. sponse manner.6 Cortisol is recognized as the Since muscle is largely constituted of water main stress hormone and, when chronically and alcohol is mainly water soluble, there elevated, creates negative metabolic effects is less water for alcohol to be distributed in, such as hypertension, diabetes, osteoporo- leading to higher BACs when drinking, and sis and increased susceptibility to infection. also increased exposure to acetaldehyde, Increased levels of cortisol are also associated a highly toxic and carcinogenic substance with some neuropsychological disorders, produced in the body when alcohol is me- including depression and Alzheimer’s disease, tabolised. The tendency for older people to although it remains unclear whether these experience higher BACs from a fixed dose are causal associations. Thus, alcohol induced of alcohol increases with advancing age and exposure to cortisol results in decreased effi- can be responsible for increasing the risks of ciency and resiliency of physiological function 8 A L C O H O L A N D O L D E R PEO PLE
2 INCREASED SUSCEPTIBILITY 80% in many organs and an acceleration of the effects are drowsiness, memory impairment, aging process. Given the increased blood alco- confusion and impaired muscle control with hol levels from drinking in old age compared increased risk of falls. All these side effects to younger ages, these effects are especially are compounded by alcohol. Another com- pronounced among the elderly. mon class of drugs used by elderly include anticoagulants (blood thinning agents) such 2.3 Interactions with medication as warfarin or newer medications such as Eighty per cent of all Improper use of medications is estimated to direct thrombin inhibitors. The metabolism of people above 65 years cause 10 – 15 per cent of all hospitalizations warfarin can be affected by alcohol and may of age in Sweden have in Sweden. Taking medications along with cause bleeding. Alcohol induced liver disease at least one medication alcohol does not usually have a significant im- can also affect the effectiveness of medica- prescribed. Alcohol pact on alcohol metabolism or blood alcohol tions used to thin the blood, thereby increas- can interact with many levels. Alcohol consumption can, however, ing bleeding risk. Finally, alcohol use may types of medication and exert strong effects on the effectiveness and increase the risk of peptic ulcer disease or increase the risk of side action of medications. Eighty per cent of all gastritis and may increase the risk of bleeding effects through a variety people above 65 years of age in Sweden have for those on aspirin therapy. of mechanisms. at least one medication prescribed. Alcohol As older people are prescribed more and can interact with many types of medication more medications, these problems have in- and increase the risk of side effects through a creased over time. There is a comprehensive variety of mechanisms. Examples of medica- scientific literature dealing with medication tions that may interact with alcohol include effects among the elderly, but the role of alco- those used for the treatment of hypertension, hol is rarely noted in clinical guidelines. This mood disorders (e.g. anxiety and depression), despite the fact that alcohol is the single most insomnia and pain.7 Alcohol may also reduce commonly used drug among older people, the effectiveness of a wide variety of pre- and that negative effects may occur even at scribed medicines. quite low levels of alcohol consumption. Interactions of alcohol with other sedative drugs such as strong painkillers (opioids) 2.4 Social relations and antianxiety drugs like benzodiazepines A number of social and lifestyle factors may can be particularly dangerous as they can contribute to potentially hazardous drinking both increase sedative effects and can change among the elderly. Most important among blood pressure either upwards or downwards. these appear to be improved purchasing pow- In extreme cases, alcohol increases the risk er compared to previous generations, smaller of fatal and non-fatal overdoses from opioid social networks and stressful life events drugs, an increasingly common concern. such as loss of a spouse. Increasing social There is evidence that even small quantities acceptance of drinking among older women of alcohol reduce tolerance to the effects of also plays an important role. Depression and strong painkillers and so increases risk of increased risk of suicide are quite common overdose. among elderly people. While depression can When alcohol is combined with drugs lead to increased use of alcohol, this in turn used to treat hypertension this can result in can worsen depressed mood over the longer sudden and potentially serious drops in blood term and increase risk of acting on suicidal pressure. Alcohol use can also directly impact thoughts.8 the ability to maintain blood pressure when Retirement can be associated with in- standing upright after sitting, a problem that creased alcohol consumption and/or prob- is anyway exacerbated with age and leads to lems. This may result from having high increased risk of falls and other injuries. pre-retirement job satisfaction and enforced Antidepressant drugs are commonly retirement.9 prescribed to older people. Common side ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOP L E 9
3 HEALTH RISKS 3 Health risks, acute and chronic Risk from alcohol-related harms can be cate- population are enhanced with the consump- gorized as those arising from chronic expo- tion of alcohol. In short, even drinking low sure over time (e.g., liver cirrhosis) or those amounts of alcohol can add to the health and stemming from acute impairment (with or safety risks already present during later life. without symptoms of acute intoxication, e.g., While a relatively small percentage of motor vehicle crashes). Although many think health and safety outcomes can be attribut- of alcohol-related conditions as being caused ed to genetic factors, the greater majority of by heavy drinking or drinking to the point of health and safety determinants in older age severe intoxication, there has been a growing are problems which could be prevented or de- recognition that lower levels of consumption, layed by healthy lifestyle in younger years but either in aggregate or a per-occasion basis, also with advancing age.10 This means that can cause health and social problems. the overall quality of life for older persons can be shaped by the physical and social environ- ments in which they live. Even drinking low amounts Since many of the health and safety of alcohol can add to the conditions that occur during older ages are health and safety risks already preventable, environmental strategies for the prevention of disease and declines in capacity present during later life. are important. As with the general popula- tion, the most effective environmental strat- This is particularly the case among older egies to reduce alcohol consumption include people. Alcohol consumption at relatively low public policies such as increasing the price of doses among the elderly is associated with alcohol (e.g., increased alcohol taxation and health problems including atrial fibrillation, minimum pricing) and reducing the physical a number of gastrointestinal disorders and availability of alcohol (e.g., limiting the num- some cancers. In addition, alcohol consump- ber of outlets, restricting permissible hours tion can cause declines in cognitive processes, of sale). Health promotion recommendations reflexes in response to dangerous situations for preventing non-communicable diseases such as driving, walking and swimming, as among older persons include increased phys- well as decrements in other skill-based behav- ical activity, good nutrition, increased social iors. Therefore, the inherent increased risks engagement, and reduced use of tobacco and of chronic and acute harms among the older alcohol. 10 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
KAPITELHUVUD 4 Trends in alcohol consumption and related harms in Sweden Alcohol consumption across different age also provides further evidence that regular groups shows some consistent patterns in alcohol consumption in later life may be an countries from many regions of the world. indicator of good health rather than a cause of Of particular interest here, is the tendency good health. This limits the interpretation of evident in both Sweden and many other studies linking level of alcohol consumption countries for older people to reduce their to health outcomes among older people, as consumption, especially as they become less discussed throughout his report. healthy and frail. For example, a major Eng- In Sweden data on self-reported alcohol lish study of the ageing process following up consumption are found in the ongoing Mon- a large cohort over time confirmed a pattern itor study12 and the Swedish National Public of reduced alcohol consumption with age. Health Survey.13 Figure 1 compares trends in However, among older people, this decline average consumption of different age groups was less and sometimes consumption even using data from the most recent Monitor increased among both men and women with report. As shown in Figure 1, younger and higher income and education.11 This study middle-aged Swedish people are now drink- ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 11
4 TRENDS FIGURE 1 Self-reported alcohol consumption liters 100 % alcohol per year in Sweden, per age group 2004 – 2017 7 6 5 4 3 17 – 29 years 2 30 – 49 years 1 50 – 64 years 0 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 65 – 84 years Source: Monitor study, from appendix to Befolkningens självrapporterade alkoholvanor 2004 – 2017 (Self-reported alcohol con- sumption in Sweden 2004 – 2017), CAN report 173, 2018. Upper age limit 80 years before 2014. ing less on average than they were in 2004. in response to their increased susceptibility to However, this trend is not evident among its effects. older people and, while there is some varia- On the surface this reduction in drinking tion across the years, there has actually been with increasing age suggests a contradiction an overall increase in consumption among in concerns about alcohol-related health and people aged between 65 and 84 years since safety risks among the elderly, since people 2004. It is important to note that these data typically drink less in general as they get are based on self-report surveys and that the older. That is alcohol-related risks would ap- average levels of consumption reported across pear to be less for the older population based all age groups are significantly lower than upon alcohol consumption alone. However, the level of actual consumption of alcohol in even if there is a decline, on the average, for Sweden when estimated from official alcohol alcohol consumption with increased age, sales. While the 65 years and older age group the naturally increased risks for health and in this survey has consistently consumed less safety problems associated with aging are than the younger age groups, with an estimat- added to any increased risk associated with ed consumption of 3.3 litres of pure alcohol drinking. In short, the risks of alcohol-related per person per year compared with 4.5 litres problems, even if lower than for younger age for those under 30 years of age, both of these groups, can increase overall health and safety estimates are less than half the actual con- risks associated with aging. sumption of the population. It is noteworthy A study of changes in drinking habits of that while older people on average consume Swedish people over the decades found that a little less than their younger counterparts, there were substantial increases in the per- this difference has been decreasing over the centage of 75-year-olds drinking at hazardous years and, as discussed in the present report, levels in 2005/2006 compared with almost is at least partly counteracted by an increased 40 years ago, in 1976-1977. Among women, susceptibility to alcohol’s effects among older hazardous drinkers increased from less than people. Indeed, the reduced consumption of 1% to 10% of the population. Among men this alcohol by older people is likely at least partly proportion increased from 19 to 27%.14 12 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
4 TRENDS As further evidence of increasing consump- for deaths and years lived with a disability tion and related harms, there has been a 30% specifically from liver cancer and also vio- increase in the rate of alcohol caused deaths lence. For example, among those age 65 to of all kinds between 2000 and 2016. The rate 69, years lived with cancer (YLD) increased of increase for alcohol-related liver disease by 17% per hundred thousand people and by has been particularly dramatic having in- 4% for those aged over 70. Years of life lived creased over this period by more than 100%.15 with a disability due to violence increased While there have been some variations by between 6 and 7% for those aged 65 years upwards and downwards over this time pe- and above.5 These are two outcomes highly riod, there have also been significant overall associated with alcohol use. increases in Sweden between 2000 and 2016 FIGURE 2 Deaths per 100,000, alcohol index (diagnoses 100 % attributed to alcohol consumption), ages 65 – 85+, 2000 – 2016, both sexes 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Statistical Database, 2018-08-13 FIGURE 3 Deaths per 100,000, alcoholic liver disease, ages 65-85+, 2000-2016, both sexes 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Source: Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare, Statistical Database, 2018-08-14 ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 13
5 RISKS 5 Methodological considerations: How do we determine risks for older drinkers? 5.1 Assessing Associations and remove a risk factor in which actual drinking Causation amounts are carefully measured over time including a control group for non-drinking. Various research approaches have been In practice, it is often practically and ethically used to study the potential contribution or challenging to conduct an RCT on a risk even a causal relationship of alcohol to the factor for disease like alcohol consumption. health and safety of older people. A common For example, a planned RCT to investigate task when assessing the extent of alcohol’s whether moderate alcohol use was protective contribution to different health outcomes is Some of these to apply the main criteria for causation in the against heart disease had a budget of US$100 million and would have required many apparent science of epidemiology i.e. the study of the thousands of people to be randomised to protective spread of illnesses in populations. The two major criteria are (i) biological plausibility either abstain from drinking or drink a small quantity each day over several years.17 In fact, effects do not e.g. evidence from experimental laboratory this study was closed down due to ethical and have biological studies identifying mechanisms of harm (or scientific concerns about its design and undue benefit) from alcohol’s impact on human plausibility. functioning, and (ii) evidence of increased alcohol industry influence.18, 19 A research design frequently used in risk of an illness or injury associated with the epidemiological research is the study of self- amount of alcohol an individual consumes reported alcohol consumption by participants – often referred to as evidence of a ‘dose-re- later linked to health or safety outcomes sponse’ relationship.16 Neither criteria is suffi- identified in official health archives. These cient on its own: biological plausibility which “observational” cohort studies have a number supports the potential of alcohol effects does of threats to validity including: selection bias not guarantee a significant impact on health arising from study participants essentially outcomes in practice as factors other than self-selecting themselves into drinker and alcohol consumption can come into play. non-drinker groups; recall bias about drink- Our confidence is increased in a causal ing which may become worse over time; and association if there is evidence from well con- under reporting of major changes in drinking ducted randomised controlled trials (RCTs) levels and patterns which can impact health of interventions that experimentally add or outcomes. 14 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
KAPITELHUVUD The majority of observational studies of their consumption for health reasons.21, 22 older people’s alcohol use and risk of future Secondly, there is evidence that young adults illness or death find some evidence of protec- who are lifetime abstainers are more likely tive effects for people who drink moderately to be disabled, have poor health and low in comparison with those who abstain. Some income.23, 24 Studies comparing abstainers of these apparent protective effects do not and moderate drinkers also find they differ on have biological plausibility. For example, a a range of lifestyle and personal characteris- review by Fekjaer (2013)20 found reduced risk tics unrelated to their drinking which placed among moderate drinkers for such implau- them at differential risk of ill-health e.g. sible conditions as deafness, some cancers, bodyweight, nutrition and exercise (Naimi, liver disease and the common cold. It is hard 1995).25 There are many “observational” stud- to explain how such protection is biologically ies linking some exposure to a risk factor for possible. Instead, it is more plausible to sup- a disease that have been subsequently refuted pose that important biases exist in many such by RCTs (e.g., hormone replacement therapy studies that create the appearance of health and reduced risk for heart disease). protection. Firstly, many older people who Naimi et al (2017)26 have shown how biases identify as abstainers in these observational in long term follow up studies can accumulate studies were drinkers who quit or reduced with increasing age resulting in the health ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 15
5 RISKS profiles of abstainers being increasingly neg- randomisation studies that relate to alcohol’s ative and those of drinkers increasingly posi- effect on health. Both of these types of studies tive. Furthermore, systematic biases towards are less likely to suffer from bias and con- continuing drinkers appearing healthier than founding than the more frequently conducted abstainers will be most pronounced among observational design studies (i.e. prospective older people. Such systematic selection bias cohort, case-control, case-crossover). In addi- over the life course is also supported by a tion, animal studies often have strong experi- meta-analysis of all studies on alcohol use mental designs and can assess alcohol-related and all-cause mortality by Stockwell et al. exposures that might be considered too risky (2016).27 It was also found in another me- or unethical in human subjects. ta-analysis by the same authors that evidence for a J-shaped curve or protection from 5.2 Identifying and Prioritizing moderate drinking against coronary heart Studies for this Report disease mortality was only present in studies In preparing this report we set out to summa- of older cohorts for whom there should be rise key findings and then draw conclusions most accumulated bias (people aged over 55 from a very large research literature concern- years at intake). Younger cohorts followed up ing alcohol’s effects on physical and mental to old age showed no evidence of cardio-pro- health as well as safety. There are many thou- tection from moderate drinking.28 In many sands of published studies in this area cover- ways regular “moderate” drinking may be a ing different aspects and health conditions. sign but not a cause of good health. In order to make sense of this complexity, One longitudinal study design, referred to and distil what can be learned, we searched as Mendelian randomisation or genetic ran- for the most representative and authoritative domization, is however thought to minimise studies by prioritising a) recent comprehen- confounding and reverse causation and be sive and systematic reviews b) major recent related to lifetime alcohol exposure. This de- studies from official national and internation- sign is applied in studies that identify genetic al sources c) high-quality studies with strong characteristics which are randomly present designs and d) studies of particular relevance in individuals in a way that is not influenced to Sweden and Scandinavia. As academic by upbringing and environment. Mendelian researchers who have contributed to the fields randomisation is the basis for studies that of alcohol epidemiology and policy, we also compare the risk of disease between individu- took account of well-known systematic biases als with different genetic profiles (e.g. Holmes and methodological problems in these litera- et al., 2014).29 Where available we will refer tures in drawing our conclusions. to evidence from both RCTs and Mendelian 16 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL 6 Impact of alcohol on death, disease, injury and disability 6.1 Total mortality More than 60 conditions have been identified as either partially or entirely caused by expo- sure to alcohol.30 There is no doubt that alco- hol is a major preventable cause of premature mortality for all ages. Increased risk of death is not limited to high levels of consump- In recent years, with the emergence of novel research approaches that substantially reduce potential for confounding and bias compared to traditional observational study designs (i.e. Mendelian randomization studies), long-standing doubts about the veracity of J-shaped curves for alcohol have been rein- forced.34 Mendelian randomization studies 60 More than 60 conditions have been identified as tion and in fact low level drinking has been for instance suggest no protective effect for either partially or entirely identified as a major cause of excess mor- low-dose consumption and coronary heart caused by exposure tality arising from a range of alcohol-related disease events.29 This is important because to alcohol. There is no cancers. Past meta-analyses of the observa- the apparent protective effects for low-volume doubt that alcohol is a tional studies which dominate this literature consumption on total mortality are due to major preventable cause have nevertheless shown J-shaped curves for observed protective effects on coronary heart of premature mortality all-cause mortality with beneficial effects at disease, so the veracity of the J-shaped curve for all ages. low doses. Interestingly, these studies also and protective associations for low-volume suggest that the level at which maximum consumption for all-cause mortality remains potential benefit may be achieved is probably in doubt. However, based on observational less than 10 grams of ethanol per day and for study data, across the general population, women may be as low as 5 grams a day (e.g. including for older persons when assessed, Bagnardi et al 200431). In fact, the latest, and the lowest risk of death is generally found largest, report on this subject, from the Glob- among those drinking less than 10 grams of al Burden of Disease project, finds that the ethanol daily.27, 35–39 Furthermore, a Mendeli- safest consumption level is 0.30 What is more, an randomization study of older persons finds social and economic cost studies based on the reduced all-cause mortality with a genetic supposition that health benefits from alcohol variant associated with less alcohol consump- exist, show that the total social and economic tion.40 costs of harms from alcohol still outweigh the sum of the benefits.32, 33 ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 17
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL 6.2 Cardiovascular diseases and to be greater for relatively older persons com- diabetes pared with the general population.28, 41 How- ever, the concern is that older ages would also Coronary heart disease, stroke, hyperten- tend to magnify sources of bias including the sion and diabetes are all more prevalent ‘sick quitter’ phenomenon and the ‘healthy among older people, and so studies of these survivor’ bias, and protective effects attenuate outcomes among the general population when attempting to account for these biases.28 are relevant to those in later life, even if the In addition, Mendelian randomization studies cohorts used in those studies are sometimes find no protective effect for low-volume not restricted to older people. Both congestive alcohol on coronary heart disease events or heart failure (associated with heavy consump- coronary calcification. 29, 42, 43 tion) and atrial fibrillation (associated with While randomized trials of the Mediter- any consumption) are for example far more ranean diet find protective effects for the common among older individuals but will not primary and secondary prevention of CHD be discussed in detail in this report. outcomes44, 45, those trials were not rand- There has been no randomized study of omized with respect to alcohol consumption. low-volume alcohol consumption and any Although these latter findings do not pre- morbidity or mortality outcome related to clude protective effects of low-dose alcohol coronary heart disease. Excessive alcohol con- consumption, they mean that the apparent sumption, including heavy average consump- benefits of a Mediterranean diet (i.e. one tion and binge drinking, are risk factors for in which the moderate use of alcohol is one coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension small part) may be explained by factors other and the development of diabetes or to poor than alcohol consumption. diabetes control. Strokes may either be ischemic (in which In terms of low-dose or “moderate” con- blood flow is blocked or reduced to a por- sumption, most observational studies find tion of the brain) or hemorrhagic (in which protective effects for coronary heart disease. a blood vessel bursts, interrupting flow and Furthermore, protective associations appear also sometimes creating pressure on sur- rounding brain tissue); ischemic are the most prevalent of the two. In observational studies, high-volume consumption is a risk factor for both stroke types. Low volume alcohol consumption appears protective for ischemic (but not hemorrhagic) strokes among both men and women, though at lower levels for men (less than one drink per day) than for women (about one drink per day).46, 47 A re- cent well-designed and large study questions whether even light drinking protects against ischemic stroke39 while a Mendelian randomi- zation study finds no protection from having a gene related to reduced alcohol consumption on all strokes.29 For hypertension, in itself an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and mortality, most but not all observational studies find a positive relationship between alcohol consumption and both higher blood pressure and incident hypertension across 18 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL all levels of consumption, particularly among dence that heavy alcohol use is responsible men.48 Furthermore, a meta-analysis finds for worse outcomes and increased risks for that reductions in alcohol consumption are cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. In par- associated with reductions in blood pres- ticular, studies of hypertension, a major risk sure.49 A meta-analysis of Mendelian rand- factor for cardiovascular disease, find only omization studies also finds positive rela- negative impacts from the consumption of tionships between alcohol consumption with alcohol even at low doses. In better designed increased blood pressure and hypertension studies there is little or no evidence of pro- among men.50 tective effects for low-dose alcohol, especially In terms of blood glucose and diabetes, ob- for men. Furthermore, genetic studies using servational studies generally find a protective Mendelian randomisation have found no effect of alcohol consumption (e.g. 51, 52), with evidence of protective effects from low-dose the lowest level of risk among those consum- alcohol use on cardiovascular disease or dia- ing about one drink daily. However, sex strat- betes for either men or women. ified results find significant protective effects only among women53 and even these may be questioned as there are relatively few well de- Alcohol has been classified by the signed studies of women. Moreover, in anal- World Health Organisation as a yses restricted to trials with a never-drinking comparison group (as opposed to all non-cur- Group 1 carcinogen since 1988 rent drinkers), alcohol was not associated with any protective effects for either women or men.53 Mendelian randomization studies 6.3 Cancer also find no significant protective effect of Advancing age is the leading risk factor for alcohol consumption on diabetes.29, 54, 55 Fi- incident cancer and for cancer mortality, and nally, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical those over age 65 account for approximately trials finds no protective effect of low-volume 70% of all cancer deaths. Increased cancer alcohol consumption on blood glucose control susceptibility among older persons is likely among those with diabetes.56 due to a combination of reduced cellular In experimental studies, alcohol adminis- mechanisms (e.g., DNA repair mechanisms) tration raises HDL cholesterol levels. Howev- and an accumulation of carcinogenic damage er, a Mendelian randomization study found from environmental exposures over the life no cardio-protection for those carrying a gene course (e.g., tobacco, alcohol).61 In addition, variant that raises HDL. Furthermore, after cancer treatment options may be limited or controlling for their effects on LDL, rand- less desirable on the basis of age (e.g., stem omized studies of statin drugs have not found cell transplants, aggressive surgical debulk- a significant relationship between changes ing), or available treatments may have greater in HDL and coronary heart disease. Final- relative toxicities than among relatively ly, several drugs that effectively raise HDL younger persons. have not resulted in reduced coronary heart Alcohol has been classified by the World disease events in clinical trials. For these Health Organisation as a Group 1 carcinogen reasons, although HDL is associated with car- since 1988 when it was concluded that there diac outcomes it is not likely causal for heart was sufficient evidence for its causal role in disease.57–59 Alcohol consumption does not cancers of the oral cavity, pharynx, larynx, appear to meaningfully affect levels of LDL esophagus and liver. Since that time, several (bad) cholesterol.60 hundred more epidemiological studies have In summary, taking account of studies reported on the association between the con- of biological plausibility and studies with sumption of alcoholic beverages and the risk stronger designs, there is considerable evi- for cancer at various sites. In 2007, the IARC ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 19
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL added cancers of the female breast, colon and dementia attributable to alcohol is now recog- rectum to the list of cancers caused by alcohol nized as much larger than previously thought. (IARC, 2007).62 World Cancer Research Heavy drinking is strongly associated with the Fund (2016)63 more recently concluded that development of Alzheimer’s disease. Alcohol stomach cancer also was causally related to use disorder is the strongest modifiable risk alcohol consumption. There is also accumu- factor for dementia onset and is associated lating evidence for causal association between with all other independent risk factors for alcohol use and both prostate and pancreatic dementia onset.69 cancers.64–66 The areas of cognitive decline and dementia The increased risk of these cancers is are areas of particular concern for older per- normally found to be increased even for light sons, and have been increasing in developed or moderate drinkers with no safe level of nations worldwide. Although it is clear that consumption (e.g. 64). However, the ap- heavy drinking can cause alcoholic dementia, pearance of a protective effect does occur in the effects of low-volume consumption on some studies, likely due to the same kinds dementia, including Alzheimer’s dementia, 571 of confounding factors described earlier in are more controversial. Summarizing the liter- relation to the apparent J-shaped curve for ature on the effects of low volume drinking on alcohol and mortality generally. Most studies cognition, four lines of research are consid- of alcohol and cancer outcomes suffer from ered. One of these supports protective effects the same kinds of systematic bias discussed for cognitive impairment while the other three earlier in particular relation to cardiovascu- do not. In the first, the observational studies, lar disease. In one meta-analysis of prostate a majority of studies find J-shaped curves, cancer, it was found that when former drinker where low-volume drinking appears protec- bias was corrected the estimated risk for tive of dementia (e.g. 70). While most of these For Swedish people 65+ moderate drinkers increased from 8% to studies find a J- or U-shaped curve for alcohol and older we estimated 22%.66 This means that the increased risk of consumption and the risk of dementia, some 571 deaths attributable cancers from alcohol consumption are likely have investigated the effects of the apolipo- to alcohol in 2014 for the underestimated when based on meta-analysis protein e4 allele, where they find that carriers seven cancers currently of the existing literature. of this allele have an increased risk of demen- deemed by WHO to be In one of our previous reports67, we applied tia with increasing alcohol consumption.71 caused by alcohol. the latest methods used internationally to Nearly every review of observational (i.e., quantify the burden of cancers attributable to non-randomized) studies however describes alcohol in Sweden.68 For Swedish people 65+ methodological problems of underlying and older we estimated 571 deaths attribut- studies, such as under-representation of heavy able to alcohol in 2014 for the seven cancers drinkers in population-based cohorts; incon- currently deemed by WHO to be caused by sistent measurement of alcohol use or demen- alcohol. This is likely to be a substantial un- tia, or both; insufficient control of potential derestimate as there are likely more cancers confounders; and insufficient consideration of than these causally related to alcohol use and sample attrition in patients with alcohol use the risk estimates derived from the existing disorders. literature are themselves likely to be underes- In the second, the structural studies con- timated. sistently report increased rates of atrophy of the brain, and especially the hippocampus (an 6.4 Cognitive function area of the brain associated with memory), at Alcohol is recognized as a powerful neuro- all levels of drinking including relatively low toxin, known to cause or contribute to a wide levels.72 In the third, the Mendelian random- range of neurological disorders including ization studies, the outcomes are mixed, but dementia and fetal alcohol syndrome, among overall there is no evidence for protective ef- many others. Furthermore, the burden of fects from moderate drinking.73 In the fourth, 20 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
KAPITELHUVUD the animal studies, of which some have the consumption and dementia, found a J-shaped advantage of having an experimental design risk curve in which low-volume drinking ap- with controls, all levels of alcohol consump- peared to be protective for dementia.77 On the tion appear to be harmful to the brain and other hand, the Whitehall II imaging study cognitive function.74 found increased odds of hippocampal atrophy Some research has shown a relation- in a dose dependent fashion, with increased ship between the development of cognitive risk starting at low levels of consumption.78 impairment and lifestyle-related risk factors A recent Swedish study, based on the that are shared with other non-communicable Swedish twin registry adds to the growing diseases. These risk factors include physical body of research in which all levels of alcohol inactivity, obesity, unbalanced diets, tobac- consumption appear detrimental to cognitive co use and harmful use of alcohol as well as function.79 The study used information from a diabetes mellitus and mid-life hypertension. sample of people in the Swedish Twin Regis- Other potentially modifiable risk factors try, who in their midlife (1967) participated in more specific to dementia include mid-life a survey on alcohol intake and 25 years later depression, low educational attainment, participated in a longitudinal study on cog- social isolation and cognitive inactivity.75 A nitive aging. This study showed that alcohol randomized study of the Mediterranean diet intake was related to lower cognitive perfor- showed protective effects for the development mance in a dose-response manner, starting at of dementia; however, the study was not ran- low levels. domized with respect to alcohol consumption and so the results were inconclusive.76 6.5 Injury The scientific controversy is illustrated Injuries may result from a wide range of ex- by conflicting evidence from the Whitehall ternal causes such as road crashes, falls, near II study. On the one hand, an observational drowning, burns, or violence. Here we have study on the Whitehall II cohort, on alcohol considered the research evidence for three ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 21
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL major forms of injury, road crashes, falls scientific papers published between 2003 and and physical/psychological abuse. Several 2013.88 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control meta-analyses find significant associations in reviewing national crash records for all between alcohol use and risk of injury within of the U.S. found that involvement in fatal six hours of drinking compared to abstainers crashes per mile travelled begins increasing for all ages.80–82 For older drinkers specifi- among drivers ages 70 – 74 years and are cally, risk of injury is also likely to be higher highest among drivers aged 85 and older in immediately after alcohol exposure but may the U.S. This later trend has been attributed also be compounded by the onset of physio- more to an increased susceptibility to injury logical changes that occur with aging includ- and medical complications among older ing reduced bone density, decline in balance, drivers rather than an increased risk of crash coordination and reaction time, vision and involvement.89 hearing problems and medication use.83 While driving and drinking alcohol increas- es crash risk for all ages, there is evidence that older drivers have higher risk of crashes There is evidence that older than younger drivers at the same BAC levels. drivers have higher risk of This has been confirmed by one controlled laboratory study of driving simulation in crashes than younger drivers which participants were given alcohol prior at the same BAC levels. to the simulation. The study found in general that older adults performed more poorly with driving precision and impairment as a result 6.6 Road crashes of alcohol consumption measured by steering It is well established that in relation to motor rate and the ability to maintain a constant vehicle injury, alcohol use, even at relatively speed than younger drivers. The study also low levels, is a risk factor for drivers of all found that one serving of alcohol was enough ages.84, 85 Road crashes are of concern in most to affect seniors’ driving abilities in contrast industrialized societies and as increased to younger age groups with the same level wealth increases the availability of private of alcohol consumption.90 A national study automobiles for personal transportation, the in the U.S. based upon fatal crash records risk of traffic crashes and resulting injuries examined BAC levels for drivers and found and fatalities becomes increasingly serious that among fatal crashes in which drivers had across the world. Increased wealth also leads BAC levels less than 0.08% there was a much to increased resources to traffic safety work higher proportion of older drivers compared which in the longer run decreases the risks for with the youngest aged driver group, despite road crashes.86 Since safe driving is depend- the latter also being a sub-population at high ent upon both training and personal driver crash risk.91 skills and ability to operate complex tasks, the In short, not only are older drivers of great- aging process may affect some older driver er risk of injury and death than all younger abilities and also increase driving risks due to ages, but this accident risk is increased with changes in vision and cognitive functioning the consumption of alcohol, even at very low (ability to reason and remember), as well as dosages. Moreover, there is the addition- physical changes.87 In 2002, international- al risk of interaction between alcohol and ly more than 193,000 traffic deaths traffic psychoactive medications taken by the older were registered among people who were 60 driver. While younger drivers are at greater years and older. The mortality rate for such risk for crashes at a given BAC, the risk of accidents for 100,000 persons in this age serious outcomes is greater for older drivers population was the highest compared to other at similar BAC. age groups based upon a systematic review of 22 A L CO H O L A N D O L D ER PEO PLE
6 IMPACT OF ALCOHOL 6.7 Falls report drinking lower amounts of wine have a significantly lower risk of falls and hip frac- For the general population research evidence ture compared to non-drinkers100, 101 but that on the association between falls and episodic risk increases at 2 or more drinks per day.96 alcohol use generally shows a linear dose-re- However, these observational studies are sub- sponse relationship such that the more ject to the same kinds of design limitations alcohol that is consumed the greater the risk described in earlier and apparent protective of falling.81 Older people fall more often than effects at low doses are likely to be due to their younger counterparts often as a conse- uncontrolled confounding and bias. quence of chronic health conditions, impaired vision, ear problems, muscle weakness or 6.8 Physical and psychological abuse possibly medication use. They may also have of older people an increased fear of falling as the consequenc- es can be more serious, long lasting and occur Physical and/or psychological abuse of older at times and places where they are alone.83 people by others (‘elder abuse’) has gained One of the few systematic reviews of attention as a significant societal problem in alcohol’s effect on risk of falling among older more recent years. A large meta-analysis of drinkers specifically (65+ years) was con- data collected from 28 countries estimated ducted by Ridolfo and Stevenson (1998).92 that about one in six people aged 60 years or They noted that one of the problems with older had experienced elder abuse of some studies in this area is that they often recruit form including psychological, financial, ne- participants from nursing homes and that glect, physical and sexual.102 Elder abuse may both self-reported alcohol use and the nature be even higher among vulnerable dementia of falls among those residing in institutional patients with estimates ranging from about settings will differ to individuals living in 28% to 52%.103 As average population age unsupervised situations. People living in res- continues to increase worldwide, the prev- idential aged care are likely to be more frail, alence of elder abuse is also likely to grow take more medications and be at higher risk rapidly. of falling but also less likely to consume sig- nificant quantities of alcohol. They concluded that for people aged 65 years and older, acute intoxication is a cause of 12% of male and 4% of female falls. These findings matched results from a recent experimental study showing that even low level alcohol use adversely affects postural stability among persons over 65 years, especially among those who already have poor balance.93 However, some recent studies have pro- duced mixed findings with some showing no association at all (e.g. 94) and others showing a protective effect for falls at low doses (e.g. 95 ). Research on hip fracture, osteoporosis and low bone mass density also suggests that compared to abstainers, those who regularly drink small amounts of alcohol (between 0.5 to 1 drink per day) have a lower risk of developing these conditions.96–99 At least two studies suggest a J-shaped curve where older drinkers, particularly women, who ALCOH OL AND OLDER PEOPLE 23
You can also read