20 Vegetation Management Plan: Buffer Zone to the Rudder Park Flying-fox Camp - Stage 1 - Kempsey ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
May
20
Vegetation Management Plan:
Buffer Zone to the Rudder Park Flying-fox Camp – Stage 1
Prepared For: Kempsey Shire Council
6 John St Port Macquarie NSW 2440
Phone: 6593 6178
Mobile: 0431 833 968
jbenvironsw@gmail.com
www.jbenviro.com.au
JBEnviro
Document control register:
Revision Distribution Date Authorised By
1 Kempsey Shire Council 20/5/2020 JB
2 Kempsey Shire Council 27/5/2020 JB
2.1 Kempsey Shire Council 27/5/2020 JB
3 Kempsey Shire Council 28/5/2020 JB
2
JBEnviro
TAB TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 AIM ....................................................................................................................... 6
2 REQUIREMENT FOR THE VMP .......................................................................... 6
3 BACKGROUND INFORMATION ......................................................................... 9
3.1 SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS ................................................................................. 9
3.2 VEGETATION ................................................................................................... 10
3.2.1 Current Vegetation .................................................................................. 10
3.2.2 Target Future Vegetation ........................................................................ 10
3.2.3 Biosecurity Act 2015 ............................................................................... 11
3.3 CAMP CHARACTERISTICS ................................................................................. 12
3.3.1 Estimated numbers and ecological role .................................................. 12
3.3.2 Current spatial patterns ........................................................................... 13
4 IMPLEMENTATION AND RESPONSIBILITIES ................................................. 15
4.1 LEGAL COMPLIANCE ........................................................................................ 15
4.2 RESPONSIBILITY .............................................................................................. 15
4.2.1 Project Ecologist ..................................................................................... 16
4.2.2 Bush Regeneration Contractor................................................................ 16
5 PRE-WORKS AND OTHER MEASURES .......................................................... 17
5.1 WORKS TIMING ............................................................................................... 17
5.2 CAMP ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................ 17
5.2.1 Pre-works and During Clearing Work ...................................................... 17
5.2.2 Post-clearing ........................................................................................... 17
5.3 SITE INDUCTION AND DAILY TOOL BOX .............................................................. 17
5.4 NOTIFICATIONS AND REPORTING....................................................................... 18
5.4.1 Public Notice ........................................................................................... 18
5.4.2 Neighbours.............................................................................................. 18
5.4.3 DPIE ....................................................................................................... 18
5.4.4 Wildlife Carers......................................................................................... 19
3
JBEnviro
5.5 PLANT DISEASE HYGIENE AND MANAGEMENT .................................................... 19
5.6 FAUNA W ELFARE AND STOP W ORK TRIGGERS................................................... 20
5.6.1 General Measures .................................................................................. 20
5.6.2 Stop Work Triggers ................................................................................. 20
5.6.3 Emergency Actions ................................................................................. 21
6 WEED REMOVAL AND RE-PLANTING ............................................................ 22
6.1 WEED REMOVAL ............................................................................................. 22
6.1.1 General ................................................................................................... 22
6.1.2 Removal of Giant Bamboo ...................................................................... 23
6.1.3 Erosion Control ....................................................................................... 24
6.2 INFILL TUBESTOCK PLANTING ............................................................................ 24
6.2.1 General ................................................................................................... 24
6.2.2 Recommended Species .......................................................................... 24
6.2.3 Maintenance ........................................................................................... 26
7 VEGETATION ACTION PLAN SCHEDULE AND KPIS .................................... 27
8 REPORTING ...................................................................................................... 32
8.1 FLYING-FOX MONITORING ................................................................................ 32
8.1.1 Post works .............................................................................................. 32
8.1.2 Quarterly monitoring ............................................................................... 32
8.2 BUSH REGENERATION ..................................................................................... 32
8.2.1 Frequency and Duration ......................................................................... 32
8.2.2 Review and Updating .............................................................................. 33
9 COMPLIANCE .................................................................................................... 33
APPENDIX 1: FLYING-FOX RESCUE PROTOCOL................................................ 34
4
JBEnviro
LIST OF TABLES
Table 1: Weeds on site listed under the Biosecurity Act 2015 .................................. 11
Table 2: Stop Work triggers ...................................................................................... 21
Table 3: Recommended species for tubestock planting ........................................... 25
Table 4: Action Plan .................................................................................................. 27
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Rudder St flying fox camp (2017 recorded extent)....................................... 7
Figure 2: Proposed buffer area (red zone) .................................................................. 8
LIST OF PHOTOS
Photo 1: The main roost area viewed from Riverside Park ....................................... 13
Photo 2: The southern giant bamboo clump and part of the central buffer area ....... 14
Photo 3: Central area of buffer.................................................................................. 14
Photo 4: Golden Bamboo in northern end of buffer zone .......................................... 15
5
JBEnviro
1 Aim
Under the provisions of the Rudder Park Flying-fox Management Plan (Ecosure 2017) and
NSW Flying-fox Camp Management Policy (OEH 2015), Kempsey Shire Council (KSC) intends
to modify vegetation over two stages to form a 15m wide buffer zone to the Rudder Park flying
fox camp, as shown in Figure 2.
This work is a Level 2 action under the Plan, and this Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) is an
update of the current plan (Picton 2019). The update is to revise the proposed works to
vegetation modification only.
The primary aims of this Vegetation Management Plan (VMP) for Stage 1 are to:
Remove approximately 0.18ha of exotic vegetation in the Stage 1 buffer zone to
establish a vegetated buffer to the camp that is not suitable for flying-fox roosting.
Replace the exotic vegetation with low growing natives and maintain bank stability.
Minimise disturbance during works on the flying foxes.
These aims address the relevant ecological recommendations of Ecosure (2017).
2 REQUIREMENT FOR THE VMP
The Rudder Park Flying-fox Management Plan was developed in line with the NSW Flying-fox
Camp Management Policy to manage the camp due to public concerns regarding noise, health
and nuisance impacts of the camp.
As shown in Figure 1, the camp is spread over three mixed tenure parcels (Crown, Council and
private) on a steep cut-away bank adjunct to the Macleay River, in east Kempsey. The camp
has been intermittedly active for decades historically, but since 2011 has been occupied
virtually full time after abandonment of the formerly preferred camp in Verges Swamp (Ecosure
2017).
The camp supports all three species of protected flying-fox found in NSW, including the
threatened Grey-headed Flying-fox (Pteropus poliocephalus), which is listed as Vulnerable
under NSW and Commonwealth legislation.
The Plan provides a framework to manage the camp and abate its nuisance effect on
neighbouring dwellings. The objectives of the Plan are to:
manage community impacts and concerns associated with the Rudder Park camp,
ensure management activities are consistent with legislative responsibilities, including
the NSW Flying-fox Camp Management Policy (OEH 2015),
facilitate licence approval for actions at the camp ensure the conservation of flying-foxes
in appropriate locations,
ensure flying-fox welfare during works, and
effectively communicate with stakeholders during planning and implementation of
management activities.
6
JBEnviro
Figure 1: Rudder St Flying-fox camp (2017 recorded extent)
(source: Ecosure 2017)
7JBEnviro
Figure 2: Proposed stage 1 (red zone) and stage 2 (purple zone) buffer area
A VMP was prepared to detail the implementation of Level 2 measures of the Plan (Picton
2019). These measures consisted of removal of some of the bamboo and other exotics used for
roosting; and installation of sprinklers to deter flying foxes from roosting close to dwellings.
Investigations into the establishment and operation of the sprinklers however determined this
measure was impractical due to:
Lack of suitable natural platforms for the spinklers: Only 1 native tree large enough to
support mounting sprinklers occurs in the buffer zone. The giant bamboo is highly
flexible, hence mounting sprinklers was impractical on these stems. Artificial mounts
would need very tall and heavy poles to (a) be stable in all weather and (b) be high
enough to be an effective deterrent.
Design limitations: Due to the height and location of the sprinklers, providing water at a
sufficient pressure was deemed likely to be both very costly and high risk of being
impractical due to the pumps, piping and water pressure required.
8JBEnviro
Work Health & Safety: The buffer zone is located on an extremely steep slope with
access only from the lookout or a short private driveway bound by canopy cover of
adjacent trees. As the spinklers would need very tall and heavy poles, the practicality of
installing the poles and maintaining the sprinklers was deemed too risky from a WH&S
point of view.
The more suitable option was thus removal and replacement of vegetation to establish a buffer
as detailed in section 8.2.1 of the Plan. This VMP details how this buffer will be established for
the Stage 1 area (Stage 2 will be subject to an updated VMP in 2021) and maintained over a
nominal 5 year lifespan (subject to achieving the aims and key performance indicators).
The works under this VMP will be undertaken under a licence issued by the DPIE, as part of
approvals via a Review of Environmental Factors under Part 5 of the Environment Planning &
Assessment Act 1979.
3 Background Information
3.1 Supporting Documents
In preparation of this VMP a number of reports and documents have been reviewed and utilised
including:
Department of the Environment (2015). Referral guideline for management actions in
grey-headed and spectacled flying-fox camps, Australian Government Department of
the Environment, Canberra,
www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/6d4f8ebc-f6a0-49e6-a6b6-
82e9c8d55768/files/referral-guideline-flying-fox-camps.pdf.
DECC (2008) Best practice guidelines for the grey-headed flying-fox, Department
of Environment and Climate Change NSW, Sydney.
www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/threatenedspecies/08540tsdsflyingfoxbpg.pdf.
Ecosure (2017). Rudder Park Flying-fox Camp Management Plan. Unpublished report to
Kempsey Shire Council. Ecosure, Gold Coast.
OEH (2015) Flying-fox Camp Management Policy 2015, Office of Environment and
Heritage, Sydney, www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/threatenedspecies/150070-
flyingfoxcamppolicy.pdf.
OEH (2012) NSW Code of Practice for Injured, Sick and Orphaned Flying-foxes,
Office of Environment and Heritage, Sydney.
www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/wildlifelicences/120026flyingfoxcode.pdf.
Picton, A. (2018). Vegetation Management Plan for Buffer Zone and Canopy Mounted
Sprinklers at Rudder Park, Kempsey. Prepared for Kempsey Shire Council.
Westcott, D. and McKeown, A. (2011). Flying Fox Survey Manual. CSIRO Ecosystem
Services.
9JBEnviro
3.2 Vegetation
3.2.1 Current Vegetation
The buffer area in the Stage 1 area is dominated by exotic vegetation comprising:
Giant Bamboo (Bambusa sp*.): Dominates the southern end as a monoculture, standing
~15m tall, with the upper half of the outer stems leaning heavily away from the clump.
Stems are 10-20cm in diameter, and heavily covered with foliage in the upper third to
quarter of the stems. Flying-foxes roost in the dense foliage.
Bamboo (Phyllostachys aurea*): Dominates the northern end of the buffer, and reaches
up to 5m high but mostly around 3-4m. The northeastern fringe is used by flying-foxes for
roosting, with many showing damage (broken tips, lack of foliage).
Lantana (Lantana camara*): Dominates the steepest slopes in the centre of the site.
About 1-2m high with often 100% cover, interspersed with exotic ornamental garden
escapees of herbs, exotic vines and small trees including Tree Mallow (Malva
dendromorpha*) and Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos*).
A single Red Mahogany (Eucalyptus resinifera) occurs on the northwest edge of the Stage 1
buffer, underlain by a mature Camphor Laurel (Cinnamonum camphora*). This tree and some
planted Spiny-headed Matrush (Lomandra longifolia) at the edge of the lookout essentially
comprise the only natives in the Stage 1 buffer area.
The Stage 2 area will be subject to further survey, but is also dominated by weeds including the
smaller bamboo and lantana.
3.2.2 Target Future Vegetation
The adjoining properties beyond the camp along the riverbank were inspected by adjacent
street access or binoculars from the opposite bank to identify the original vegetation community.
Survey found that much of the current vegetation is replanted natives (many non-indigenous to
the area eg. Norfolk Pines, non-indigenous eucalypts) and exotics (eg. Camphor Laurel and
Jacaranda), as historical landuses have previously cleared the original vegetation.
Based on inspection of more intact riparian vegetation in the same edaphic situation near the
Kempsey Base hospital, a succession of River Oak and associated riverbank edge species is
likely to have graded with slope to a wet sclerophyll forest dominated by Tallowwood (E.
microcorys), Grey Ironbark (E. siderophloia), Brushbox (Lophostemon confertus), and Pink
Bloodwood (Corymbia intermedia); to a drier eucalypt forest dominated Tallowwood with Pink
Bloodwood, Thick-leaved Mahogany (E. umbra), and White Stringybark (E. globoidea) at the
top.
Rainforest species would have dominated the understorey of the foot to midslope, grading to
wattles and Allocasuarinas in the drier forest.
This community is not suitable to be restored as it will provide potential roosting habitat.
Elements of this community suitable for replanting to establish a shrubland will be targeted
using the species listed in section 6.2.2.
10JBEnviro
3.2.3 Biosecurity Act 2015
The Biosecurity Act 2015 repealed the Noxious Weeds Act 1993 and provides a framework for
the prevention, elimination and minimisation of biosecurity risks posed by biosecurity matter,
dealing with biosecurity matter, carriers and potential carriers, and other activities that involve
biosecurity matter, carriers or potential carriers.
Part 3 of the Biosecurity Act applies a general biosecurity duty for any person who deals with
biosecurity matter or a carrier to prevent, eliminate or minimise any biosecurity risk they may
pose. Under section 23 of the Act, a person who fails to discharge a biosecurity duty is guilty of
an offence.
Whilst the Act provides for all biosecurity risks, implementation of the Act for weeds is supported
by Regional Strategic Weed Management Plans (RSWMP) developed for each region in NSW.
Appendix 1 of each RSWMP identifies the priority weeds for control at a regional scale.
However, landowners and managers must take appropriate actions to reduce the impact of
problem weed species regardless of whether they are listed in Appendix 1 of the RSWMP or not
as the general biosecurity duty applies to these species.
The following table addresses listed weeds which occur in the Stage 1 site:
Table 1: Weeds on site listed under the Biosecurity Act 2015
Weed RSWMP Specifications Site Occurrence
State Priority Weed Objective: Eradication
N/A
State Priority Weed Objective: Containment
N/A
State Priority Weed Objective: Asset Protection
Madeira Vine (Anredera Mandatory Measure (Division 8, Clause 33, Occurs in southern end.
cordifolia) Biosecurity Regulation 2017): A person must
not move, import into the State or sell.
Asparagus weeds- Asparagus Regional Strategic Response – where Occurs in southern end.
aethiopicus, A. africanus, A. required:
asparagoides including the
Western Cape form (A. Develop region-wide coordinated
plumosus, A. scandens) campaigns for collaborative management.
Identification of regional containment
Lantana (L. camara) zones where required. Dominates about 50% of
Stage 1, and occurs in
Identification of key sites/assets in the Stage 2.
geographic area.
Species managed in accordance with
published weed management plan.
Regional Priority Weed Objective: Eradication
N/A
11JBEnviro
Weed RSWMP Specifications Site Occurrence
Regional Priority Weed Objective: Containment
Honey Locust (Gleditsia Whole of region: The plant or parts of the Scattered mainly in
triacanthos) plant are not traded, carried, grown or central part of Stage 1.
released into the environment.
An exclusion zone is established
for all lands in the region, except Within exclusion zone:
the core infestation area which
comprises: the plant is eradicated from the land and
the land is kept free of the plant
Richmond Valley Council
Land managers mitigate the risk of the
Ballina Shire Council plant being introduced to their land
Clarence Valley Council
(Mann catchment)
Lismore Council
Kyogle Council
Byron Shire Council, and
Tweed Shire Council
Additional Species of Concern in North Coast LLS Region
Crofton Weed (Ageratina High priority for asset protection to minimise Scattered mainly in
adenophora) impacts. central part of Stage 1.
Climbing Asparagus, Ground Common in southern end
Asparagus (Asparagus of site.
africanus/A. plumosus/A.
scandens)
Lantana Dominates centre of
Stage 1.
Narrow-leaved Privet (Ligustrum Rare in lower central
sinense) area of Stage 1.
Camphor Laurel (Cinnamomum Young treesJBEnviro At time of preparation of this VMP, over a thousand bats were estimated to be present by the extent of camp space occupied rather than approximate direct counts as the bats were predominantly hidden from view by the dense foliage and habit of roosting well in both foliage or low down behind cover, obscuring them from view from any observation point. Previous counts have varied from 1000 to
JBEnviro
Photo 2: The southern giant bamboo clump and part of the central buffer area
Photo 3: Central area of buffer
14JBEnviro
Photo 4: Golden Bamboo in northern end of buffer zone
4 Implementation And Responsibilities
4.1 Legal Compliance
This VMP requires approval from the NSW Department of Planning, Infrastructure, and
Environment (DPIE), and will have to comply the licence to undertake the works under the NSW
Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016.
A Review of Environmental Factors (REF) has been prepared for the activity, addressing the
relevant legislation including the following:
Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999.
NSW Biodiversity Conservation Act 2016.
NSW National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974.
NSW Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979.
4.2 Responsibility
The VMP is to be implemented by contractors engaged by Kempsey Shire Council (KSC).
Contractors will include:
A qualified and experienced ecologist that meets the specifications detailed in s.4.2.1.
Bush regenerators to remove the Bamboo, Lantana and other weeds; and replace these
with native species.
15JBEnviro
4.2.1 Project Ecologist
As per the Plan, a project ecologist/flying-fox expert is required to manage the animal welfare
aspects of the VMP.
The project ecologist must demonstrate the following criteria:
Tertiary qualifications and at least 5 years demonstrated experience in ecological
surveys, including identifying fauna and flora to species level, fauna habitat and
ecological communities.
Practising member of the Ecological Consultants Association of NSW
Knowledge of flying-fox habitat requirements, and experience in flying-fox camp
management.
Knowledge of flying-fox behaviour, including ability to identify signs of flying-fox stress.
Ability to differentiate between breeding and non-breeding females, and able to identify
females in final trimester.
Ability to estimate age of juveniles.
Experienced in flying-fox population monitoring including static and fly-out counts,
demographics and visual health assessments.
ABLV-vaccinated.
4.2.2 Bush Regeneration Contractor
For bush regeneration and weed removal, a Bush Regenerator (BR) contractor will be engaged.
The BR will undertake or direct activities such as planting, brushcutting, weed control, watering,
etc undertaken personally or by other persons, and the BR will be responsible for their actions
and abidance to the VMP.
The BR contractor must be suitably qualified and experienced as follows:
Minimum Conservation & Land Management Certificate 3/Bush Regeneration Certificate
2 or equivalent);
Minimum 5 years experience in ecological restoration or similar activities which
demonstrate capability to implement and monitor the plan,
Be a member of the Australian Association of Bush Regenerators (AABR) or fulfil the
membership criteria;
Hold the necessary licences/certifications eg. Chemcert; and WH&S certifications and
training.
The BR is obligated to follow any instruction by the project ecologist to adjust methods, pause
or stop works at any time and for any specified amount of time. The BR will consult with the
project ecologist before and after undertaking periodic maintenance on the site.
The BR and all staff are expected to have the appropriate training and certifications to work in
the site conditions and use the plant/tools required. All plant will be maintained to WorkCover
standard with recent certified inspections.
16JBEnviro
5 Pre-Works and Other Measures
5.1 Works Timing
The weed removal works are to be undertaken in late autumn to July, with no clearing of
vegetation allowed outside this time. This is required to avoid the Grey-headed Flying-fox
breeding season (August to February) in accordance with the Plan.
If the Little Red Flying-fox is found to be present during March-October, works will need
approval from DPIE due to risk of breeding of this species.
Watering and weeding after this phase is expected to be low impact, with no use of power
tools, hence subject to advice and (if deemed necessary) the project ecologist’s supervision or
direction, this will be undertaken as required over the maintenance phase of the VMP.
5.2 Camp Assessment
5.2.1 Pre-works and During Clearing Work
Within the constraints of the site’s physical characteristics, WH&S and visibility of the bats, the
PE is to collect the following information prior to the vegetation removal and replanting works
commencing:
Map the extent of the camp via outer perimeter of roosting bats.
Provide a provisional estimate via direct counts (if possible given the visibility constraints)
from the various viewpoints.
Confirm the species present.
As the clearing works will be undertaken outside the Grey-headed Flying-fox season, and
assuming no Little Red Flying-foxes are found, an assessment of presence of pups or females
in final trimester is not required.
The camp extent is to be mapped each day by the PE is on-site undertaking monitoring for the
VMP; and up and downstream vegetation assessed (eg. from the Riverside Park vantage
points) for off-site roosting as a result of disturbance.
5.2.2 Post-clearing
The PE is to repeat the above monthly following works until the beginning of the next breeding
period or as otherwise directed by DPIE.
5.3 Site Induction and Daily Tool Box
Any person working on the site is to be inducted by the project ecologist (PE). The PE shall:
Detail the legal obligations of the VMP’s approval, including obligation to follow the PE’s
directions.
Detail the animal welfare stop-work triggers.
Detail a stop-work and monitoring procedure.
17JBEnviro
Detail WH&S in regards to working in the camp buffer and any encounters with native
fauna.
Detail precautions for Lyssa and Hendra virus.
Clarify the boundary of the works area, and that no-one is to enter the core roosting area
at any time.
A daily pre-start toolbox will be held with site staff to reiterate the above, and implement any
improvements to work practices.
5.4 Notifications and Reporting
5.4.1 Public Notice
Information regarding the works (including specifying the dates the weed removal work will be
undertaken) will be notified via the local radio and newspaper, as well as Council’s website at
least 1 week before works commence. The advice is to clearly state that no dispersal works are
being undertaken, only establishment of a buffer between the camp and adjacent residents and
park users.
Information will also include a contact number for any community concerns, including reporting
off-site roosting of bats during the works. If practical, the public may be invited to register
interest in collecting sections of the giant bamboo under suitable arrangements with KSC.
Public access to the park will be closed during the primary weed removal work period and this is
to be notified via the above and temporary signage at the entrance off Macleay Valley Way/Lord
St.
5.4.2 Neighbours
Council is to notify residents adjacent to the camp at least one week prior to works
commencing. Notice will include:
Timing and nature of works.
Contact number and person at KSC for non-animal welfare related matters.
Project ecologist’s contact number for emergency animal welfare matters, and a copy of
the Flying-fox Rescue Protocol.
Notice not to assist in the works, and report any unusual flying-fox behaviour eg. roosting
in their yard.
5.4.3 DPIE
KSC is to notify DPIE when works are to commence, and complete. DPIE will be notified of the
final date of commencement (subject to weather, etc) no less than 48hrs before
commencement.
The project ecologist is to:
Provide a copy of the Flying-fox Protocol (see Appendix 1) completed with all relevant
contact details.
18JBEnviro
Notify DPIE and KSC of any major incident at the earliest safe opportunity.
Within 1 months of clearing works completion, provide a report to DPIE and KSC
detailing the outcomes of the clearing works monitoring (including a summary of
responses to activity in the buffer); details on the number and nature of complaints before
and after the works; and any relevant recommendations.
Undertake the post-works monitoring as per S.8.1.
5.4.4 Wildlife Carers
The project ecologist is to:
Contact F.A.W.N.A. to alert of potential care of animals as a result of the works, and
complete the Flying-fox Rescue Protocol’s contact details and arrangements.
Arrange suitable pick-up or drop-off arrangements for any flying-fox needing to be taken
into care with a licensed carer.
Identify an approved vet for any potential emergency treatment, and contact the vet a
week before works commencement to work out any arrangements.
5.5 Plant Disease Hygiene and Management
Best Practice management guidelines (listed below) for Phytophthora cinnamomi are to be
adopted on the site ie. sterile equipment to be used:
https://www.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/science/plants/pestsdiseases/phytophthora-
dieback/disinfection-procedures
http://www.environment.gov.au/biodiversity/invasivespecies/publications/management-
phytophthoracinnamomi-biodiversity-conservation
If Myrtle Rust is detected, the advice from NSW Department of Primary Industry
(http://www.dpi.nsw.gov.au/biosecurity/plant/established-plant-pests-and-diseases/myrtle-rust,
accessed 18 September 2017) is to:
Always start jobs with clean equipment and clean vehicles;
Relocate planned activities from known or likely infected areas to another place if
possible;
Comply with risk management and mitigation measures.
The control procedures detailed in the following reference should be followed:
https://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/pestsweeds/110683myrtlerustmp.pdf
19JBEnviro
5.6 Fauna Welfare and Stop Work Triggers
5.6.1 General Measures
The following general measures will apply:
Absolutely no vegetation is to be felled if a flying fox is roosting within it, or at risk of
being harmed by falling timber. The project ecologist is to inspect the vegetation before
felling, advising the arborists which stems can be taken and where to fell them to avoid
risk of injury or excess disturbance to roosting bats; and closely observe the felling
process.
Birds are unlikely to be breeding in nests when the vegetation removal works are being
undertaken, but should a nest be found, the project ecologist is to direct and manage its
removal.
Any Ringtail Possum dreys are to be similarly handled under direction of the project
ecologist.
Only vaccinated and licenced persons may handle living or dead flying foxes. Anyone
who detects an animal showing distress, on the ground or dead must not touch or handle
the animal, but report the animal immediately to the project ecologist.
Any plant such as wood chippers/mulchers, chainsaws and brushcutters are to be started
as far away as possible from the camp (eg. downslope in the access to the park), and
approach/run accordingly to allow the bats to adjust to the noise. Continuous operation
over short periods is preferred to short, irruptive use. Users must abide the ecologist’s
direction to cease work if bats show stress, or to repeat the adjustment cycle when plant
has been stopped for some time, to allow bats to adjust.
No works to take place in periods of adverse weather including strong winds,
seasonal extreme cold events, during rainfall, or during periods of likely flying-fox
population stress (e.g. food bottlenecks).
No works which disturbs roosting bats is to be undertaken from August to February.
DPIE will be immediately contacted if LRFF are present between March and October, or
are identified as being in final trimester/with dependent young.
5.6.2 Stop Work Triggers
The Plan recommends disturbance works to be undertaken for a maximum of 2.5 hours in any
12 hour period, ideally before sunrise or sunset.
Due to WH&S restrictions and practicality (eg. steep slope, noise impacts on neighbours), works
including removal of the giant bamboo is very difficult to undertake at these times. Where
practical, the most noisy work activities will be scheduled to occur close to fly out eg. wood
chipping.
The project ecologist is remain on site during clearing and (if deemed necessary by disturbance
behaviours shown on the particular day) planting works to monitor for the following Stop Work
triggers:
20JBEnviro
Table 2: Stop Work triggers
Welfare Trigger Signs Action
Unacceptable level If any individual is observed: Works cease for the day
of stress
Panting;
Saliva spreading; or
Located on or within 2m of the
ground
Fatigue More than 30% of camp takes flight: Works to cease and:
or
recommence only when flying foxes
Individuals are in flights for more have settled.
than 5 minutes; or
maximum of two unsuccessful attempts
Flying-foxes appear to be leaving the to recommence work before ceasing
camp. for the day.
Injury/Death A flying-fox appears to have been Works to cease immediately and KSC
injured/killed on site (including aborted /DPIE notified; and.,
foetuses).
Rescheduled; or,
Any flying-fox death is reported within
Adapted sufficiently so that significant
1 km of the site that appears to be
impacts are highly unlikely to occur,
related to the works.
as confirmed by the project ecologist;
Females in final trimester or
dependent/crèching young present.
Stopped indefinitely and alternative
Loss of condition detected. management options investigated.
If the camp is showing low or no disturbance and works are low impact (eg. planting),
supervision by the PE is only required periodically during the day from various strategic
observation points if the site staff remain in ready communication with the PE.
If the Stop Work triggers are exceeded over two consecutive days; a bat death related to the
works is recorded; roosting off-site is recorded: all work will cease and the work methods and
timing (eg. operating power tools and plant after sunset fly-out) will have to be reconsidered with
approval from DPIE.
5.6.3 Emergency Actions
Appendix 1 contains the nominal flying-fox rescue protocol from the Plan. This is to formally
completed before works commence and issued to KSC and DPIE.
The PE will be responsible for implementing the protocol and report any incident to DPIE within
24hrs.
21JBEnviro
6 Weed Removal and Re-planting
6.1 Weed Removal
6.1.1 General
While the focus is on the bamboo, Biosecurity threats, Weeds of National Significance, High
Threat Exotic species, and any other recognised transformer weed which can impair
regeneration are a priority to be removed. This generally comprises the majority of the current
vegetation on the site. Council has requested retention of the mature Jacaranda in the
southeast of the site.
Given the site’s challenges, the arborist and bush regenerator are to select the appropriate
methods to remove the site weeds in line with the following principles:
Noise: Avoids or minimise disturbance of the camp eg. minimal or no use of brushcutters,
chainsaws, wood chippers/mulchers, leave blowers, etc.
Chemicals: Poses minimum or nil risk due to contact, contamination, spray mist, etc, on
non-target vegetation and roosting flying foxes.
WH&S: Methods must not pose an unacceptable risk of injury to workers or public.
The following general principles are expected to be followed in the process:
a) Primary weed control (establishment phase)
Primary weed control involves initial weed control and aims to eliminate the parent weed seed
source on the site. The process of primary weed control requires accurate identification of all
plant species and application of the appropriate control method for individual weed species.
At this site, it is likely to involve techniques such as spraying, cutting and/or painting with 100%
Glyphosate type herbicide (‘Bioactive’ due to proximity to waterway to avoid impacts on the
aquatic ecosystem). Intensive treatments are given weeds dominate and natural regeneration is
minimal.
Ideally, these weed control methods should be employed prior to flowering and propagule
development. Where this is not possible, any flowering, fruiting or seeding bodies should be
removed from plants treated using the appropriate methods (eg. cutting, bagging and disposal).
Effective and accurate weed control at this stage is fundamental to successful restoration of
plant communities. The timing and staging of weed control will require coordination with the
availability of local native tubestock to establish native cover that will suppress weed
regeneration over the establishment phase.
b) secondary weed control (establishment phase)
Secondary weed control is timed to follow the primary weed control which ‘releases’ both native
and weed species, and allows regeneration as resources for plant growth such as light, space,
moisture and nutrients are made available to nearby plants and soil seed banks. Establishment
and development of upper stratums early will increase shading and competition for water,
suppressing the regeneration and establishment of weeds.
22JBEnviro
This secondary control importantly thus needs to be timed so that weed growth does not ‘get
away’. In some circumstances, this may entail removal of weed species at seedling stage: the
aim here is to prevent their further spread, though it must be remembered that some
regenerated weeds can provide useful shelter for seedling natives eg. Native Tobacco.
Repeated application of secondary control (eg. quarterly per year) will be required in some
areas to exhaust the weed seed bank and prevent any new seedlings maturing and seeding.
This will allow planting and seeding to occur with competitive weed growth reduced and
increase success.
Foliar herbicide spray applications will be an important method in this stage but will need to be
used in conjunction with hand weeding to avoid impacts on tubestock growth and any native
species recruitment.
This secondary stage may require multiple visits depending on the resilience of the site and its
location. Given the low resilience and riparian location at this site, resource requirements for
secondary control are likely to be at the higher end to achieve effective control.
c) maintenance of the site
The maintenance of the site in this stage consists of ongoing, regular, weed control phase over
the remainder of the minimum 5 year establishment phase. Frequency and duration will vary
according to the resilience and re-development of the native vegetation, viability of weed seed
in the soil, and the proximity of weed sources for re-infestation.
6.1.2 Removal of Giant Bamboo
The Giant Bamboo poses a significant challenge to removal due to its height and current use as
roosting habitat by the flying foxes.
The BR is to determine the most appropriate method of removal in liaison with the project
ecologist. In accordance with s.5.5, the method must endeavour to cause the least disturbance
of the majority of the roosting bats.
It is expected the bamboo will be cut with a pole saw to remove the top, and remaining stem cut
with a chainsaw. The remaining stump will be painted with herbicide to prevent re-sprouting, as
removal of the root stock would need heavy earthmoving plant which cannot access the area
due to the slope; and the plant and work may impose significant disturbance of the camp.
The cut material is expected to be transported upslope to Rudder Park via a winch hauling
bundles of stems. Some stems may be strategically reused on site to stabilise the slope, offered
to the community, or retained on site to provide refuge for native fauna; and the remainder
mulched for re-use on site for weed and erosion control.
If the removal process proves impractical due to significant disturbance of the bats as per s.5.5,
the following method will be implemented, most likely with a series of repeat treatments to
achieve complete mortality:
Drilling and injection of herbicide.
Periodic monitoring of death and collapse of the bamboo.
Removal of dead material only outside the maternity season, under supervision of the
project ecologist in the following year.
23JBEnviro 6.1.3 Erosion Control The removal of the lantana via cutting the stem at ground level and painting the root stock is expected to pose a risk of erosion given the steep slope and that this weed often shades out grass and other soil stabilising cover. The Golden Bamboo roost stock is not to be mechanically removed, but also appears to have largely shaded out other cover. As it has a plethora of stems which will be cut at or near ground level, erosion risk is less in this area. The BR is responsible for choosing, installing and maintaining appropriate erosion control measures to mitigate the risk of erosion any exposed soil; to use weed removal methods that minimise soil disturbance; and to locate and use access tracks (eg. the former pathway in the northern end) accordingly to minimise challenging erosive runoff. Jute matting or mulching, and if suitable, sections of the giant bamboo stems are to be used where required to maintain protection to expose soil. If this is not sufficient, measures such as sediment fencing may be required. Installation of these measures will be subject to the controls under s5.5. 6.2 Infill tubestock planting 6.2.1 General To ensure quick growth and suppression of weeds given the low resilience of the site, infill planting will be undertaken. As a general rule, plantings are to be distributed in a non-linear pattern to establish a natural appearance, unless it achieves greater erosion control. Clump planting can be undertaken to establish a more random/natural species assemblage where erosion risk is less. Bulk planting of tubestock is to be completed in Year 1 and 2 of the VMP in the respective stages of weed removal, but will depend on control success of the Golden Bamboo. Failed plantings which are to be audited during periodic monitoring by the BR are to be replaced with stock of equivalent maturity to facilitate achieving KPIs detailed in section 7. 6.2.2 Recommended Species The following species have been selected on the basis of: Indigenous to the locality. Found in the edaphic situation within the Local Government Area Available commercially. Grow to
JBEnviro
Table 3: Recommended species for tubestock planting
Stratum Species Frequency Density
Acacia longifolia Low
Breynia oblongifolia Common
Pittosporum multiflorum/ Citriobatus Common
pauciflorus
Pittosporum undulatum Low
Pittosporum revolutum Common
Leptospermum polygalifolium Common
Notelaea longifolia Low
Callistemon viminalis Low
Melastoma affine Common
Wilkea huegeliana Common
Polyscias sambucifolia Common
1 shrub per 1m2
Shrub Layer Alchornea ilicifolia Low
(1m centres)
Persoonia sericea Low
Trochocarpa laurina Low
Sannantha similis Common
Pimelea ligustrina Common
Alchornea ilicifolia Low
Banksia spinulosa Low
Croton verreauxii Common
Trema tomentosa Low
Ozothamnus diosmifolium Common
Cordyline stricta Common
Pomaderris ligustrina Low
Bursaria spinosa var macrophylla Low
Crinum pedunculatum Low
Imperata cylindrica Common
Oplismenus imbecillis Common
Gahnia clarkei Common
Clumped plantings
Gahnia aspera Common
Groundcover (min. 1 plant/0.6m2)
Lomandra longifolia Common
Microlaena stipoides Common
Commelina cyanea Common
Dianella caerulea Common
Carex appressa Common
25JBEnviro
Stratum Species Frequency Density
Entolasia marginata Common
Cymbrogen refractus Common
Ottochloa gracillima Common
Adiantum hispidulum Common
Doodia aspera Common
Blechnum cartilagineum Common
Calochlaena dubia Common
Lepidospermum laterale Common
Alpinia caerulea Common
6.2.3 Maintenance
A maintenance program comprising watering, weeding, mulch maintenance (if employed) and
watering is required to ensure plantings are successful over the life of the plan and KPIs met.
A general guideline is provided in section 7, with the BR to negotiate an agreed suitable
adaptive regime with KSC subject to the site and weather conditions, and success of weed
control measures.
26JBEnviro
7 Vegetation Action Plan Schedule and KPIs
The following table summarises the bush regeneration actions to be undertaken over the 5 year implementation: and identifies the Key
Performance Indicators (KPIs).
Table 4: Action Plan
Compliance Mechanism/
Stage Issue Actions Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator
Contingency
Engage Bush Engage bush KSC BR and any contractors/staff KSC not to authorise
regenerator (BR) regenerator contractor Year 1 must be suitably qualified as commencement until
specified engagement confirmed.
Source tubestock Order minimum BR contractor Minimum projected local Additional tubestock
and seed. projected local provenance tubestock acquired for replacement
Year 1-2 and
provenance tubestock numbers required (and seed) plantings in Year 2-3
as required
numbers required (and ordered.
seed). Annual reporting to KSC
Pre-planting Weed removal Works area clearly BR contractor Long-term target ofJBEnviro
Compliance Mechanism/
Stage Issue Actions Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator
Contingency
Giant bamboo Cut and remove BR contractor Giant Bamboo totally Animal welfare
removal method to be removed in Year 1 requirements override all
Project Ecologist
trialled. other considerations.
If cut and remove Project ecologist to strictly
not possible, stem Year 1 enforce Stop Work triggers.
injection to be
undertaken; and Annual reporting to KSC
monitoring of Post-works reporting to
success every 3 DPIE
months.
Erosion control: Use minimum BR contractor No erosion recorded. Conditions in contract to
ensure ground till methods. require remediation.
preparation does
not create erosion. Dig hole Annual reporting to KSC
according to
specifications.
Mulch or use Year 1-2, and
jute mesh as required.
matting
accordingly.
Sediment
fencing where
required to
mitigate risk.
28JBEnviro
Compliance Mechanism/
Stage Issue Actions Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator
Contingency
Tubestock planting Planting of BR contractor Tubestock establishment Review planting methods
tubestock is to be not impaired. and establish and address
carried out in loss causation factors.
accordance with Weed cover reduced by
AABR best practise. primary and secondary Replace losses at monthly
control actions, with 95% inspection.
Holes dug with tree weed reduction target
planter, hand trowel achieved by end Year 5. Annual reporting to KC
or mattock/shovel.
>90% success rate of all
Fertiliser and water plantings at end of Year
crystals used for Year 1-3 and 5.
each plant as required
Planting
Tree guards placed (includes
Stage/Year 1-3
around each plant if replacement
required. plantings)
All plants watered
immediately after
planting with a
minimum 5 litres per
plant.
Failed plantings
replaced annually to
ensure KPI met in
Yr3
29JBEnviro
Compliance Mechanism/
Stage Issue Actions Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator
Contingency
Disease control All tubestock, BR contractor No diseases introduced. Quarantine and treat if
imported soil mix, detected.
and mulch should
be certified free of Annual reporting to KSC
Phytophora and
Myrtle Rust to
prevent introducing Year 1-3
these to the offset (includes
area. replacement
If Myrtle Rust plantings)
detected, best
practice actions to
be undertaken to
quarantine, remove
and dispose of
infected plants.
30JBEnviro
Compliance Mechanism/
Stage Issue Actions Timing Responsibility Key Performance Indicator
Contingency
Watering and Ensure plant BR contractor 90% tubestock survival Increase weed
maintenance: mortality minimised rate by Year 5. management if below KPI
and weeds until achieved.
suppressed, and 95% weed control
maximise Annual reporting to KSC
germination and
establishment of
hand sowing of
native grasses.
Watering as per As required
industry standard
practise in terms of
frequency and
current weather
patterns
Maintain mulch.
Maintain weed
control
Planting failures: Replace planting BR contractor 90% tubestock survival Maintain replacements until
opportunities for failures until gaps rate by Year 5. gaps closed.
weed invasion. are closed. Year 2-5 95% weed control at end
Maintain mulch as of Yr 5.
Maintenance required.
Year 2-5
Weed control/native Weed control as BR contractor Weed control to meet KPI.
dominance required (maintenance
Year 2-5 Additional planting,
weeding) identified by
biannual inspection. mulching as required.
31JBEnviro
8 Reporting
8.1 Flying-fox Monitoring
8.1.1 Post works
As per the Plan, a report will be submitted by the PE to DPIE and KSC within 1 month of the
commencement of the clearing works.
The report will details the results of the monitoring specified in section 5.2, and “lessons learnt”
from the daily monitoring during vegetation removal. Any incident will be detailed, and relevant
recommendations for future work provided.
8.1.2 Quarterly monitoring
S.10.3.1 of the Plan specifies that Level 2 actions require quarterly monitoring and reporting for
the life of the Plan (due for review in 2022). This VMP has a minimum 5 year life span which
may exceed the current life of the Plan.
These quarterly reports will address the following:
Current camp extent, numbers and species.
Reproductive status (as relevant)
Any information on new camps that have formed in the area or changes to current camp
spatial patterns eg. influxes of bats.
Further management actions planned including a schedule of any works under the VMP
for the next quarter.
Total financial cost of the Level 2 actions to date, and funding sources.
Copies of the annual bush regeneration reporting will also be provided.
8.2 Bush Regeneration
8.2.1 Frequency and Duration
The BR is expected to monitor weeds and regeneration quarterly over the minimum 5 year
period to ensure the works are on target to reach the KPIs by the end of Year 5. Should they
be met earlier, monitoring may crease.
Reporting to KSC will occur annually across years 1-5, with a baseline report provided before
commencement of the planting and weed maintenance aspects of the VMP.
Monitoring and works will cease when KSC accept the VMP aims and KPIs have been met.
The monitoring and works period will require extending beyond Year 5 if KPI’s have not been
met and cease when they are deemed met. This is to ensure the VMP is effectively
implemented and accounts for delays due to drought, planting, failures, etc.
32JBEnviro
Monitoring reports must include:
Static photo-monitoring reports from baseline to end of year 5, with photos taken at
initiation, and then 6 monthly intervals. A minimum of 1 point should be monitored in
each area of core weed infestation in the Stage 1 area. Photos are to be taken in the 4
cardinal directions at each photo monitoring point.
Projected foliage cover of weeds and natives at baseline over the total area, and
annually over the 5 year program.
Summary of works undertaken since the last monitoring period and predicted for the
next; including costings.
Any recommendations to be implemented in the next phase.
Checklist assessment of progress to KPIs.
8.2.2 Review and Updating
The BR contractor will submit the monitoring reports to KSC.
Identified additional actions identified for implementation in a monitoring report must be
assessed and reported in the next monitoring period. Any actions identified by KSC must be
implemented and reported in the next report.
If required to facilitate an adaptive management regime, this VMP is to be amended/updated
as required to achieve the overall objectives listed in section 1. The amended plan is to be
approved by KSC before implementation.
9 Compliance
This VMP sets out the specific actions required to be undertaken; responsible parties; and
KPIs to monitor implementation of the VMP.
Scheduling works to avoid the critical breeding period and monitoring of the camp for animal
welfare during the weed removal works will form part of the approval under the BC Act issued
by DPIE. KSC will ensure this is complied with.
The provision of annual monitoring reports to KSC detailing the bush regeneration results will
significantly assist in ensuring objectives are met over the projected time frame. Monitoring
over a minimum 5 year maintenance period will also ensure the compensatory plantings are
effectively established, and should require little maintenance after this period if KPIs are met.
The implementation of the VMP will be deemed successful when monitoring determines that
the objectives for the management zones are achieved as per the listed specified KPIs.
33JBEnviro
Appendix 1: Flying-fox rescue protocol
34You can also read
