VERMONT Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2017-2021 - A Comprehensive Plan to Reduce the Number of Crashes on Vermont's Highways - The Vermont ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
VERMONT Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2017-2021 A Comprehensive Plan to Reduce the Number of Crashes on Vermont’s Highways
Thank You to All Highway Safety Partners The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance (VHSA) would like to thank its public and private sector partners for their contributions and dedication to the development and implementation of the State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP). Since its foundation in 2012, VHSA members have worked collaboratively for the good of public safety, focusing on the ultimate goal of Zero Deaths on Vermont highways. By targeting Vermont’s most critical emphasis areas for improving highway safety and implementing effective strategies and action plans, the VHSA and its partners have made great strides in improving the safety of Vermont’s highways. The 2012-2016 SHSP has been immensely successful, resulting in a 15% reduction in major crashes on the State’s highways in the last five years. The efforts of these organizations and their members, listed below, toward achieving this success is greatly appreciated. ½½ 3M ½½ JoyRyde ½½ AAA of Northern New England ½½ Lamoille County Planning Commission ½½ AARP Driver Safety ½½ Local Motion ½½ Addison County Regional Planning ½½ National Highway Traffic Safety Commission Administration (NHTSA) ½½ Associated General Contractors of ½½ Northeastern Vermont Development Vermont and Project Road Safe Association ½½ AT&T ½½ Northwest Regional Planning Commission ½½ Bennington County Regional Commission ½½ Private Driver Education Schools ½½ Central Vermont Regional Planning ½½ Ride Safe Vermont: Motorcycle Training Commission ½½ Rutland Regional Planning Commission ½½ Chittenden County Regional Planning ½½ Southern Windsor County Regional Commission (CCRPC) Planning Commission ½½ Co-Operative Insurance Companies ½½ Sp!ke Advertising ½½ Education and Safety Unit at the ½½ TextLess Live More Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) ½½ Town of Barre ½½ F.R. Lafayette ½½ Two Rivers-Ottauquechee Regional ½½ Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Commission ½½ Federal Motor Carrier Safety ½½ TXT U L8R (UVM Medical Center and Administration (FMCSA) the Clinical Simulation Laboratory at the ½½ Governor’s Highway Safety Program UVM College of Medicine) ½½ Impaired Driving Rehabilitation Program ½½ University of Vermont Medical Center (Formerly known as CRASH) 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan i
½½ University of Vermont, Transportation ½½ Vermont Judicial System Research Center ½½ Vermont League of Cities and Towns ½½ Vermont Agency of Transportation ½½ Vermont Local Roads (VTrans) ½½ Vermont Sheriffs Association (and ½½ Vermont Association of Chiefs of Police member departments) (and member departments) ½½ Vermont State Police (VSP) ½½ Vermont Automotive Distributors Association ½½ Vermont Truck and Bus Association (and member companies) ½½ Vermont Department of Health ½½ Volunteer Citizens ½½ Vermont Department of Liquor Control ½½ VTrans Highway Safety Data Unit ½½ Vermont Department of Tourism and Marketing ½½ VTrans Highway Safety Infrastructure Unit ½½ Vermont Driver and Traffic Safety Association ½½ Windham Regional Commission ½½ Vermont Forensic Laboratory ½½ Work Safe TCI ½½ Vermont Insurance Agents Association ½½ Youth Safety Council of Vermont Improving safety in our local communities is a shared goal, and everyone—municipalities, local organizations, private companies, and individual residents—can help the Alliance build on the remarkable progress made to date. Since 2012, the VHSA has increased its membership by 25%, rising from 43 to 54 members, and the Alliance invites everyone interested in the safety initiative to get involved. Please visit the website http://vermonthighwaysafety.org/ to join the VHSA and take the Vermont Road User Pledge: I promise to follow the rules of the road, respect the rights of all road users, and share what I know about road safety with others.” ii 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan Table of Contents Introduction........................................................................................................................................................ 1 Critical Emphasis Areas............................................................................................................... 9 Significant Emphasis Areas................................................................................................... 21 Special Emphasis Areas............................................................................................................... 25 Attachment A.................................................................................................................................................. 29 Attachment B.................................................................................................................................................. 33
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan INTRODUCTION The VHSA Introduction Progress on the 2012-2016 Plan Goals and Objectives for the 2017-2021 Plan Critical Emphasis Areas 1
Introduction The VHSA Our Vision To minimize the occurrence and severity of highway crashes, and related injuries and fatalities. Our Mission Working together, we use data to improve highway safety by integrating engineering; enforcement; education, marketing and outreach; and emergency medical services initiatives. Our Promise To make and keep our highways safe. 2 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Introduction Introduction The Vermont Highway Safety Alliance (VHSA) was formed in 2012 in an effort to formalize an integrated statewide highway safety program focused on the best utilization and sharing of resources to accelerate the advancement of highway safety in the State. The VHSA is an independent nonprofit alliance comprised of a diverse group of public and private organizations, as well as volunteer citizens who represent all users of Vermont’s highway system. The mission is to work together to collect, share, and use data in a unified effort to develop and implement strategies that improve highway safety. Amongst its duties, the VHSA oversees the preparation of the State’s Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP), which is a major component and requirement of the Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP). The SHSP serves as the framework for reducing fatalities and major* crashes on the State’s public highways. Through a data-driven process, the SHSP identifies the most Critical Emphasis Areas (CEAs) and safety needs for the State, and selects for implementation the strategies and countermeasures with the most potential to save lives and prevent injuries. This multi-year comprehensive plan takes a holistic and integrated approach in establishing statewide goals by embracing the use of the four E’s of highway safety: Education, Enforcement, Engineering, and Emergency Services. The SHSP incorporates elements from the other individual safety plans prepared for the State of Vermont, including: ½½ Highway Safety Program (HSP) ½½ Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) ½½ Motor Carrier Safety Assistance Program Commercial Vehicle Safety Plan ½½ Vermont State Police Strategic Plan ½½ Department of Motor Vehicle (DMV) Strategic Plan ½½ Traffic Records Strategic Plan The following report documents the progress made to date since the adoption of the 2012-2016 SHSP, evaluates the needs moving forward with the updated plan, and sets new (aggressive, yet attainable) goals for the next five years. The VHSA is proud to present this updated 2017-2021 SHSP and reaffirms its endless commitment to working Toward Zero Deaths on Vermont highways. *Major crashes are defined by the Vermont Agency of Transportation (VTrans) as fatal or incapacitating injury crashes. 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 3
Introduction Progress on the 2012-2016 Plan Developing an effective course of action for the 2017-2021 SHSP relies first on understanding what progress has been made in achieving the goals established in the 2012-2016 plan. Fortunately, when it comes to evaluating the success of the 2012-2016 plan, there is much improvement to report. The recent five years of data shows that Vermont continues to make great headway in reducing major crashes on the State’s highways. While the 2011 through 2015 major crash data shows steady progress, it is the longer-term historical trends that tell the true story. At the time the 2012-2016 SHSP was developed, data from 2004 through 2011 indicated that major crashes statewide were trending downward at a rate of 10.9%. With this in mind, the VHSA set an aggressive goal of reducing major crashes an additional 10% by 2016. Ultimately, this objective was exceeded, with an overall major crash reduction of 15% over the last five years—a total decrease of 25.7% since 2004. Overall Major Crashes Trend 500 450 400 350 300 250 200 150 2004-2008 100 2005-2009 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2007-2011 2010-2014 2011-2015 50 0 10.9% Reduction 14.8% Reduction 5-Year Rolling Average 2012-2016 SHSP Goal 2004-2011 2008-2015 2004-2015 10.9 + 14.8 = 25.7 Reduction % Reduction % Reduction % 10 Goal Met % 4 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Introduction This success can be attributed to the selection and implementation of strategies and countermeasures specifically targeted for each of the six CEAs identified in the 2012-2016 SHSP, as well as integrated use of the four E’s. The SHSP intentionally set aggressive goals for each CEA. Of the six CEA goals, five of them were met. The table below shows a breakdown of each CEA and their associated goals and results. Major Crash Reduction Goals and Results Crtical Emphasis Area SHS Goal Results Goal Met? CEA 1 1A-Minimize Lane Departure 10% 8% No 1B-Design and Operation of Intersection Safety 10% 11% CEA 2 2A-Younger Driver Safety (21 and Under) 20% 29% Yes 2B-Older Driver Safety (65 and Over) 5% 7% CEA 3 Curb Speeding and Aggressive Driving 20% 21% Yes CEA 4 Use of Occupant Protection 10% 10% Yes CEA 5 Impaired Driving 10% 23% Yes CEA 6 Distracted and Inattentive Driving 10% 35% Yes As seen in the table, great strides were made in reducing major crashes in some of the CEAs. For example, while impaired driving may not account for a significant portion of the total crashes in Vermont (only 3%), these crashes make up 18% of fatal crashes and 13% of crashes resulting in incapacitating injuries. As a result of the 2012-2016 SHSP, the major crashes attributable to impaired driving has been reduced by 23% since 2011. In addition, younger drivers under the age of 21 account for almost 1 in 7 of all fatal and incapacitating injury crashes statewide. Major crashes associated with younger drivers have decreased 29%, exceeding the 20% aggressive goal previously set for this CEA. Also, major crashes associated with distracted and inattentive driving have decreased by 35%. This can be attributed in part to the statewide ban on texting while driving that went into effect during this time period. However, it is important to note that these crashes are likely underreported, as they heavily rely upon self-reporting from the driver. Results like these illustrate that the actions taken by the VHSA to make and keep Vermont’s highways safe are working. While the successes to date should be celebrated, it is important for the 2017-2021 SHSP to bring us even closer to achieving the goal of Zero Deaths. 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 5
Introduction Goals and Objectives for the 2017-2021 Plan Major crashes have the most severe impact on those involved. Their effects are far-reaching and include the loss of human life. Despite the great progress made in reducing major crashes during the 2012-2016 SHSP, approximately 325 major crashes—with an average fatality rate of 60 deaths per year—still occurred annually in Vermont from 2011 through 2015. For this reason, targeting the reduction of major crashes will continue to be the primary goal of the VHSA for the 2017-2021 SHSP. During this timeframe, the Alliance will seek to reduce major crashes in Vermont another 10%. This goal has been carefully considered and takes into account the likelihood that the effectiveness of some of the successful crash-reduction strategies currently in use may lose their impact over time, particularly as Vermont’s culture on highway safety changes. Cascading down from this primary goal are a series of Critical Emphasis Areas (CEAs), Significant Emphasis Areas (SEAs), and Special Emphasis Areas, discussed in the following pages. Critical and significant emphasis areas differ in that SEAs account for a smaller percentage of major crashes statewide. Meanwhile, Special Emphasis Areas are those that are difficult to determine through analysis of existing data trends. Each plays an integral role in the SHSP. Achieving the objectives for the 2017-2021 SHSP will require collecting, using, and sharing data to inform strategies, prioritize efforts, and measure performance. The plan is intended to follow the objectives of the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) national effort to improve highway safety, known as Toward Zero Deaths (TZD). Like TZD, the SHSP is a data-driven effort focusing on identifying and creating opportunities for changing Vermont’s culture as it relates to highway safety. Perhaps most importantly, a successful 2017-2021 SHSP depends on continued dedication and hard work from the Alliance and its partners. The continued success of the SHSP will rely upon a team of champions working together to address the myriad of factors surrounding highway safety. The VHSA’s goal of reducing crashes will be achieved through the continued unified collaboration of all the partners involved; private, local, state, and federal. The strategies and associated action plans selected for the SHSP will directly impact highway safety through the four E’s of highway safety, as well as policy, public health, communications, and other efforts. The VHSA Board of Directors and the Focus Groups have worked diligently to develop an integrated approach to the SHSP that gathers and utilizes the experts needed to meet the goals of each emphasis area. Using the SHSP as the guiding document, the VHSA will continue to reach out and expand, engaging safety partners in all communities throughout Vermont. 6 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Introduction Critical Emphasis Areas Seven CEAs have been identified for the 2017-2021 Vermont SHSP. These CEAs have been identified and prioritized through a data-driven approach using crash data analysis. The chart below summarizes the output of analysis based on data from 2011 through 2015. The chart provides a graphical comparison of the 5-year major crash trends for each emphasis area reviewed in preparing this plan. The chart in itself ranks the emphasis areas based on the number of major crashes associated with each, facilitating the prioritization and selection of emphasis areas for the 2017-2021 SHSP. 5 Year Trend for Major Crashes (2011-2015) 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Lane Departure Highway Intersection Young Driver
Introduction As seen in the chart, the analysis expands upon the emphasis areas presented in the 2012-2016 SHSP. The first new emphasis area is younger drivers under the age of 25. The most current evaluation of data shows a doubling of major crashes for drivers under 25 when compared to drivers under 21. This increase indicates the potential need to expand the younger driver age group and consider specific strategies to target drivers between the ages of 21 and 25. The second new emphasis area combines vulnerable users and motorcycles. Motorcycles were not included in the definition of vulnerable users in the 2012-2016 SHSP; however, they also experience a heightened level of exposure with regard to highway safety when compared to automobiles and trucks. The individual and combined crash trends of these two emphasis areas have been graphed to show how they influence the priority ranking in comparison to other emphasis areas. Based on the data, the following changes were made for the 2017-2021 SHSP emphasis areas when compared to the 2012-2016 SHSP: ½½ Combine Vulnerable Users and Motorcycles into one emphasis area and elevate them from the Significant Emphasis Area (SEA) to the CEA classification ½½ Increase the age of the younger drivers from under 21 to under 25 The CEAs selected for the 2017-2021 SHSP are: 1. Improve Infrastructure a. Minimize Lane Departure b. Improve the Design and Operation of Highway Intersection 2. Reduce Speeding and Aggressive Driving 3. Increase Use of Occupant Protection 4. Vulnerable Users and Motorcyclists Safety a. Increase Pedestrian Safety b. Increase Bicyclist Safety c. Increase Motorcyclist Safety 5. Age Appropriate Solutions a. Improve Younger Driver Safety (Under 25) b. Improver Older Driver Safety (65 and Over) 6. Reduce Impaired Driving 7. Curb Distracted and Inattentive Driving The following section provides an overview of each emphasis area, along with its specific goal and strategies for accomplishing the goal. 8 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Bristol, Vermont, HSIP Intersection Project at VT Route 116 & North Street. Photography by: J Michael Worthington, Jr. www.worthingtonimages.com Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREAS CEA 1 Improve Infrastructure 1A – Minimize Lane Departure 1B – Improve the Design and Operation of Highway Intersections CEA 2 Curb Speeding And Aggressive Driving CEA 3 Increase Use Of Occupant Protection CEA 4 Vulnerable Users & Motorcyclists Safety 4A – Increase Pedestrian Safety 4B – Increase Bicyclist Safety 4C – Increase Motorcyclist Safety CEA 5 Age Appropriate Solutions 5A – Improve Younger Driver Safety (Under 25) 5B – Improve Older Driver Safety (65 and Over) CEA 6 Reduce Impaired Driving CEA 7 Curb Distracted Driving and Keep Drivers Alert 9
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA IMPROVE INFRASTRUCTURE 1 CEA 1A – Minimize Lane Departure Lane departure crashes are defined as crashes in which a vehicle ran off the road and/or overturned and/or collided with a tree, a pole or sign, a guardrail, ledge or boulder, or any other fixed object including another vehicle. Over the past five years, lane departure crashes accounted for 54% of fatal crashes and 43% of incapacitation injury crashes. It is Goal important to note that speeding was reported as a contributing factor in 24% Reduce major crashes by 10 % between 2017-2021 of the lane departure crashes. The 5-year Strategies rolling average from 2004 through 2015 shows a 15% reduction in lane departure 1. Continue programs to implement low-cost safety improvements major crashes. However, this is the one on all public highways emphasis area that fell short of the 10% 2. Improve highway delineation and roadway characteristics reduction goal set in the 2012-2016 SHSP, where only an 8% reduction was 3. Improve highway characteristics to facilitate enforcement recognized. activities (such as speed enforcement) 4. Support municipalities in mitigating high crash locations by providing data, countermeasure alternatives, and other resources to implement improvements 5. Conduct and/or support research in the areas of engineering, enforcement, and education that seeks to reduce run-off-the- road crashes Lane Departure Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 175 Rolling Average 170 2004-2015 165 15 % 160 155 150 145 Reduction 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 2009-2013 2008-2012 2007-2011 2010-2014 2011-2015 140 135 130 7% Reduction 8% Reduction 10 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA IMPROVE 1 Critical Emphasis Areas 1 INFRASTRUCTURE CEA 1B – Improve the Design and Operation of Highway Intersections A highway intersection is defined as a roadway characteristic of a four-way intersection, T-intersection, Y-intersection, traffic circle, roundabout, or any intersection of three or more approaches. Since 2004 there has been a 19% reduction in major crashes at Goal 10 % highway intersections, with 11% of that reduction occurring in the most recent 5-year study period. From 2011 through Reduce major crashes by between 2017-2021 2015, 46% of intersection fatalities Strategies occurred at locations with no traffic control, 38% at locations with stop-signs, 1. Improve traffic signal operation and 11% at locations with traffic signals. 2. Improve driver understanding and compliance at intersections Through infrastructure improvements, through the use of engineering, education, and enforcement increased public awareness and traffic programs and efforts control compliance, major intersection crashes can be reduced further. 3. Implement physical changes on the approaches to and at intersections 4. Support municipalities in mitigating high-crash locations by providing data, countermeasure alternatives, and other resources to implement improvements 5. Increase awareness and safety of bicyclists and pedestrians at intersections through engineering, education, and enforcement programs and efforts 6. Conduct and/or support research efforts in the area of intersection safety for all roadway users Highway Intersection Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 100 Rolling Average 90 2004-2015 80 19 70 % 60 50 40 30 Reduction 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 20 10 0 8% Reduction 11% Reduction 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 11
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA CURB SPEEDING AND AGGRESSIVE DRIVING 2 Speeding is defined as operating a vehicle at a speed that has exceeded the authorized speed limit or too fast for conditions. Aggressive driving is defined as operating a vehicle in an erratic, reckless, careless, negligent, or aggressive manner. Historical trends show a 39% reduction in major crashes related to speeding and aggressive Goal 20 % driving between 2004 and 2015, with 21% of that reduction occurring in the last five years. Crashes attributable to speeding Reduce major crashes by between 2017-2021 and aggressive driving make up 30% of Strategies all major crashes in Vermont and 37% of the fatal crashes. Crashes due to 1. Improve the education of drivers as it relates to the impacts and speeding and aggressive driving result in consequences of speeding and aggressive driving a higher percentage of more severe 2. Improve public understanding of what aggressive driving is and injury crashes. Collaborative how it relates to public safety opportunities exist across engineering, education, and enforcement to continue 3. Increase public awareness of and adherence to speed limits and to reduce crashes resulting from other roadway regulations regarding aggressive driving speeding and aggressive driving. 4. Advance the use of infrastructure techniques and technology to manage and enforce speeds 5. Enhance existing high-visibility enforcement programs and techniques that relate to speeding and aggressive driving 5 Year Rolling Average 2004-2015 39 % Reduction 12 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA INCREASE USE 3 Critical Emphasis Areas 1 OF OCCUPANT PROTECTION Approximately 12% of the major crashes from 2011 through 2015 reported no restraint use. This may include seatbelt use, child safety restraint use, or helmet use. This percentage is down significantly from the 24% previously reported in the 2012-2016 SHSP for the period from 2004 through 2011. Despite this progress, this CEA remains a high Goal 20 % priority as crashes are more likely to result in serious injury when improper or no occupant protection is used. Over the Reduce major crashes by between 2017-2021 last five years nearly 100 major crashes Strategies involving the lack or improper use of safety restraints occurred annually. 1. Raise awareness of the importance of using seat belts and occupant protection for all users 2. Increase enforcement and strengthen safety belt laws in Vermont 3. Increase proper use and installation of child safety restraints 4. Strengthen child safety restraint use laws 5. Implement programs for consistent education for a wide range of stakeholders including motorists, parents, and schools 6. Implement programs that target at-risk demographics (such as 21-35 year-old males) 7. Continue education and outreach for vulnerable users (pedestrians, bicyclists, and motorcyclists) 8. Implement programs for occupant protection use on busses Occupant Protection Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 140 Rolling Average 120 2004-2015 25 100 % 80 60 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 40 2010-2014 Reduction 20 0 15% Reduction 10% Reduction 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 13
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA VULNERABLE USERS & MOTORCYCLISTS 4 SAFETY CEA 4A – Increase Pedestrian Safety On average, approximately 31 of the major crashes that occur each year involve pedestrians. This equates to approximately 10% of the total major crashes. However, even more notable is Goal the statistic that nearly 20% of these pedestrian crashes result in a fatality. From 2011 through 2015, the average Reduce major crashes by 10 % between 2017-2021 annual crash rate for pedestrian fatalities 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total was reported to be six crashes per year. With strong public support for the Fatalities – Pedestrians 4 10 6 4 5 29 implementation of ‘Complete Streets’ concepts and the associated increase in Major Crashes (Fatal pedestrian volume that will result on + Incapacitating 34 35 34 25 26 154 Injury) – Pedestrians Vermont’s highways, the VHSA is committed to developing strategies specifically targeted at protecting Strategies pedestrians and promoting a multi-modal 1. Improve pedestrian and driver understanding of the rules of the system for all users. road regarding pedestrians 2. Implement new pedestrian advocacy programs and improve awareness of existing programs 3. Continue to implement and promote ‘Complete Streets’ policies and traffic calming measures that consider pedestrians early in the design phase of changes to the built environment 4. Enhance collaboration efforts and partnerships between federal, state, local, and private agencies to promote inclusive communities with walkable infrastructure 14 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA VULNERABLE 4 Critical Emphasis Areas 1 USERS & MOTORCYCLISTS SAFETY CEA 4B – Increase Bicyclist Safety Over the past 10 years, the number of bicyclists on the road has been steadily increasing. As with pedestrians and motorcyclists, these road users are especially vulnerable to major crashes. Goal Crashes involving bicyclists currently account for approximately 3.5% of all major crashes and this number is likely to Reduce major crashes by 10 % between 2017-2021 increase as the bicyclist population 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total increases. Between 2011 and 2015, there were 497 total crashes involving a Fatalities – Bicyclists 0 0 0 0 5 5 bicycle user and 56 of these crashes were major crashes. As discussed under Major Crashes (Fatal CEA 4A, the trend to incorporate + Incapacitating 6 16 10 5 19 56 Injury) - Bicyclists Complete Street concepts into highway projects around the State, heightens the need to identify strategies directed at Strategies keeping all vulnerable users safe. 1. Improve bicyclists and driver understanding and education of how to properly share the road 2. Continue to implement and promote ‘Complete Streets’ policies and traffic calming measures that consider bicyclists early in the design phase of changes to the built environment. 3. Educate municipalities about the guidelines and opportunities that exist to create safer communities for bicyclists 4. Implement and promote educational programs for bicyclists regarding proper equipment and safe riding in traffic including commuter programs and Safe Routes to School 5. Enhance education and increase enforcement of improper bicycling and aggressive or harassing behavior on the part of motorists 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 15
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA VULNERABLE USERS & MOTORCYCLISTS 4 SAFETY CEA 4C – Increase Motorcyclist Safety A motorcyclist is defined as a person who is operating a motorized scooter, motor driven cycles, or motorcycle. Between 2011 and 2015, there were 980 total crashes involving a motorcycle, of Goal which 234 crashes (24%, or nearly 1 in 4) were classified as major crashes, with 41 crashes resulting in a fatality. Major Reduce major crashes by 10 % between 2017-2021 crashes involving motorcycles account 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Total for nearly 15% of all major crashes in Vermont. This update of the SHSP Fatalities – 8 11 6 7 9 41 includes motorcycle safety under the Motorcyclists Vulnerable Users CEA as a means to Major Crashes (Fatal heighten and promote the awareness of + Incapacitating 53 49 37 47 48 234 developing strategies specifically Injury)-Motorcyclists targeted for these users. Strategies 1. Improve public understanding of motorcyclist rights and responsibilities on the road 2. Improve training programs for both novice and experienced motorcyclists and continue to encourage use of the Vermont Rider Education Program 3. Enhance enforcement relating to occupant protection, DUIs, and aggressive operation of a motorcycle 4. Improve public understanding of what constitutes an approved motorcycle helmet and provide additional training to law 5 Year enforcement on this topic Rolling Average 2007-2015 Motorcycle Major Crashes Trend 11 % 54 52 50 48 Reduction 46 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 44 42 40 16 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA AGE 5 Critical Emphasis Areas 1 APPROPRIATE SOLUTIONS CEA 5A – Improve Younger Driver Safety (Under 25) In previous editions of the SHSP, younger drivers were defined as motorists under the age of 21. Looking at historical trends, the number of major crashes involving drivers under the age of 21 has decreased by 52% since 2004. This reduction is impressive and shows Goal strong progress in improving safety for younger drivers. However, further investigation revealed that when drivers Reduce major crashes by 15% between 2017-2021 under the age of 25 were considered, the Strategies number of crashes in which younger 1. Strengthen the VT graduated licensing law (GDL) for young drivers were involved more than doubled. drivers Between 2011 and 2015, drivers under 21 accounted for 14% of all major crashes in 2. Expand and incentivize initial driver education and advanced Vermont while drivers under the age of skills training 25 accounted for 30%. Drivers under the 3. Provide resources and training opportunities to parents of age of 25 in Vermont account for more young drivers than 1 in 4 of all fatal and incapacitating injury crashes statewide. Based on these 4. Create outreach programs targeting the 21 to
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA AGE APPROPRIATE SOLUTIONS 5 CEA 5B – Improve Older Driver Safety (65 and Over) An older driver is defined as a driver who is 65 years of age or older. People age 65 and older make up 17.5% of Vermont’s population, which equates to nearly 110,000 people—a notable increase from the 15% (94,000 people) cited in the 2012- 2016 SHSP. This increase in the older Goal population continues to follow the trend projected by the US Census Bureau which projects an over age 65 population Reduce major crashes by 5% between 2017-2021 in Vermont of 24% by 2030. Historical Strategies trends show that the involvement of older 1. Increase education and outreach to older drivers drivers in major crashes has decreased 7% since 2011. During the last five year 2. Continue improving infrastructure to meet the needs of all period from 2011 through 2015, major roadway users crashes involving older drivers 3. Develop and implement programs to increase public accounted for 16% of the statewide understanding and enforcement of driving with diminished incapacitating injury crashes and 24% of skills fatal crashes. With the projected population increase for this age group, it 4. Continue to research statistics, trends, and legislation for older is important to remain proactive at drivers addressing potential safety countermeasures for this demographic. 65 or older population growth in VT 150,000 120,000 15% Increase 90,000 60,000 SHSP 2012-2016 SHSP 2017-2021 30,000 0 Older Driver Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 68 Rolling Average 66 2004-2015 64 8 % 62 60 58 2004-2008 2005-2009 Reduction 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 56 54 52 1% Reduction 7% Reduction 18 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA REDUCE 6 Critical Emphasis Areas 1 IMPAIRED DRIVING Impaired driving is defined as operating a vehicle under the influence of medication, drugs, and/or alcohol. Looking at historical data, a 30% reduction in major crashes involving impaired driving has occurred since 2004, with a 23% reduction in the last five years alone. While there has been progress in reducing major crashes in this CEA, impaired driving was still reported in 20% of all major crashes in Goal 10 % Vermont between 2011 and 2015. With the continued efforts of various entities, Reduce major crashes by between 2017-2021 this number can be further reduced. Strategies 1. Improve public awareness of what impaired driving 5. Increase training for law enforcement officers to is and its associated dangers assist them in detecting incidents of Driving While Impaired by Drugs 2. Regularly update and promote programs for consistent education for individuals and 6. Support a more efficient means of collecting organizations charged with addressing impairment evidentiary samples in Driving While Impaired by issues Drugs cases 3. Increase and enforce penalties for impaired driving 7. Support expansion of use of Ignition Interlock with a streamlined approach to enforcement Devices by all DWI Alcohol offenders 4. Continue updating and implementing programs for 8. Increase offender accountability and rehabilitation impairment analysis and rehabilitation through DWI Courts and 24/7 Programs Impaired Driving Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 120 Rolling Average 100 2004-2015 30 % 80 60 40 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 Reduction 2007-2011 2010-2014 20 0 7% Reduction 23% Reduction 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 19
CRITICAL EMPHASIS AREA CURB DISTRACTED DRIVING AND KEEP 7 DRIVERS ALERT Distracted driving is defined as driving while performing any other activity, whether visual, manual, or cognitive, that could divert a person’s attention away from the primary task of driving. In the age of constant distraction and handheld technology, addressing distracted and inattentive driving has become a Goal heightened priority in Vermont and across the country. Driving while drowsy is also a contributing factor toward the Reduce major crashes by 10 % between 2017-2021 crashes that fall under this emphasis Strategies area. Since 2004, major crashes involving 1. Improve public awareness on what defines distracted driving distracted or inattentive driving have and its associated laws and dangers decreased by 40%, with a 35% reduction occurring between 2011 and 2015. The 2. Enhance effectiveness and awareness of countermeasures, such accelerated progress in this CEA may be as safety rest stops and safe texting areas partially attributed to the adoption of the 3. Improve coordination between stakeholders in order to 2014 law that bans all drivers in Vermont maximize enforcement of distracted driving penalties from using a handheld device while operating a vehicle, with drivers under 4. Continue to improve and diversify data and research statistics, the age of 18 completely banned from trends, and attitudes, and strengthen legislation related to using a cell phone. distracted driving Distracted and inattentive driving was noted as a contributing factor in 17% of the major crashes statewide between 2011 and 2015 with an average of 7 fatal crashes per year – accounting for 11% of all fatal crashes in the State annually. Alert/Distracted Driver Major Crashes Trend 5 Year 120 Rolling Average 100 2004-2015 40 % 80 60 40 2004-2008 2005-2009 2006-2010 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 Reduction 20 0 5% Reduction 35% Reduction 20 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan SIGNIFICANT EMPHASIS AREAS Significant Emphasis Areas Reduce Medium And Heavy Vehicle Crashes Improve Work Zone Safety 21
Significant Emphasis Areas Significant Emphasis Areas In addition to the CEAs, 2 Significant Emphasis Areas (SEAs) have also been identified herein. These areas are not viewed as any less important than the CEAs, however they account for a smaller percentage of the major crashes statewide. The intent is to monitor crash data and identify any trends that may emerge from the SEAs. The following SEAs have been identified: 1. Reduce Medium and Heavy Vehicle Crashes 2. Improve Work Zone Safety The following pages provide overviews of each of the SEAs, as well as an overview of goals and related ongoing safety initiatives. 22 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SIGNIFICANT EMPHASIS AREA 1 Significant Emphasis Areas 1 REDUCE MEDIUM AND HEAVY VEHICLE CRASHES The frequency of crashes involving medium and heavy vehicles has reduced significantly since 2007. Between the years of 2007 and 2015, the number of medium and heavy vehicle crashes has decreased approximately 33%. However, it should be noted that crashes reduced dramatically between 2007 and 2011, but appear to have since leveled off. In 2007, Goal there were 1,084 crashes involving The VHSA will continue their statewide safety efforts medium and heavy vehicles. In 2015, and initiatives related to medium and heavy vehicle there were 499 crashes which makes up safety. The crash data regarding total and major crashes just under 4% of all crashes in Vermont. will be monitored such that any emerging trends will be Between 2011 and 2015, heavy and immediately identified and addressed accordingly. medium vehicle crashes accounted for roughly 14% of fatal crashes statewide. Existing initiatives pertaining to medium and heavy vehicle safety It is recognized that much of the medium include, but are not limited to, the following: and heavy vehicles on the road are ½½ Commercial Motor Vehicle (CMV) crash reduction by operated by private industries and the conducting directed patrols based on crash analysis VHSA is committed to making these drivers’ workplace as safe as possible. ½½ Passenger transportation safety via increasing the number of Crash data regarding this SEA will enroute, terminal, and destination inspections on motor continue to be monitored to identify coaches and busses emerging trends. ½½ Driver and vehicle inspections including a special focus on cross-border traffic ½½ On-site carrier reviews and audits focusing on new entrant companies and carriers with a pattern of on-road safety violations ½½ Public education and outreach by organizations such as Project RoadSafe, DMV, law enforcement, employers, and others 5 Year Medium/Heavy Vehicles Total Crashes Trend Rolling Average 800 2007-2015 700 33 % 600 500 400 Reduction 300 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 200 100 0 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 23
SIGNIFICANT EMPHASIS AREA IMPROVE WORK ZONE SAFETY 2 In the most recent study period, from 2011 to 2015, work zone crashes accounted for less than half of a percent of all crashes in Vermont. This may not seem like reason for work zone safety to be a SEA but work zones are unique in that they are unpredictable and can be challenging to navigate, which poses a threat to all road users. There has been a slight decrease since 2007 in the number of a work zone crashes, dropping 2% in Goal the past 9 years. Work zone safety will The VHSA will continue their statewide efforts and continue to be a point of emphasis for the initiatives related to work zone safety. The crash data VHSA in order to keep motorists, regarding total and major crashes will be monitored such construction workers, and other road that any emerging trends will be immediately identified and users safe. addressed accordingly. Existing initiatives pertaining to work zone safety include, but are not limited to, the following: ½½ Construction work zone field reviews ½½ Work Zone Advisory Council ½½ Implementation of federal work zone rules ½½ Detailed design reviews of traffic control plans 5 Year Work Zone Total Crashes Trend Rolling Average 63 2007-2015 62 2 % 61 60 59 Reduction 58 2008-2012 2009-2013 2011-2015 2007-2011 2010-2014 57 56 55 24 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan SPECIAL EMPHASIS AREAS Special Emphasis Areas Improve Vermont’s Data In The Interest Of Safety Enhance Vermont’s Emergency Medical Services Capabilities 25
Special Emphasis Areas Special Emphasis Areas The two special emphasis areas that were included the 2012-2016 edition of the SHSP have been chosen to remain in the current plan. These Special Emphasis Areas are vital components of a complete plan and have broad reaching influences over the success of the SHSP. These two Special Emphasis Areas are as follows: 1. Improve Vermont’s Data in the Interest of Safety 2. Enhance Vermont’s Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Capabilities By nature, the impacts of these Special Emphasis Areas are difficult to determine through analysis of existing data trends, but are known to be critical to the success of highway safety in Vermont. The following section includes an explanation of the importance of the Special Emphasis Areas as they relate to highway safety, as well as a brief description of the goals and strategies for each. 26 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
SPECIAL EMPHASIS AREA IMPROVE 1 Special Emphasis Areas 1 VERMONT’S DATA IN THE INTEREST OF SAFETY Crash data is the foundation of Vermont’s highway safety programs and the VHSA. The use of data, that is accurate, timely, complete and accessible, to identify highway safety deficiencies, create projects, justify safety improvements, and track performance is crucial to the successful execution of the plan and Goal future safety initiatives. Improve statewide data in the interest of safety. A significant step was taken toward improving crash data accessibility Strategies through the development and launch of the Vermont Public Crash Query Tool in 1. Improve the quality and timeliness of police reported crash data 2014. This online tool provides public 2. Improve the quality and availability of traffic violation data access to the State’s crash database, allowing safety stakeholders and the 3. Improve the quality of the overall crash database public to view and download crash data 4. Improve the diversity and completeness of highway data to perform their own crash analyses or inform themselves about safety issues 5. Improve crash data analysis to support data-driven decision across the State or within their making communities. 6. Integrate a trauma registry and link emergency response to patient outcomes Vermont is dedicated to the continued effort of improving the quality of crash data and its integration with other safety data systems and of improving crash data analysis methods in order to make further advancement in annual crash reduction. 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 27
SPECIAL EMPHASIS AREA ENHANCE VERMONT’S EMERGENCY 2 MEDICAL SERVICES CAPABILITIES Vermont’s emergency medical services currently provide excellent care to those in need. However, where every major crash requires some degree of EMS, special consideration to evaluate and track EMS capabilities is a critical component of highway safety. Survival of Goal a major crash or the successful Improve statewide emergency medical services in treatment of a severe injury depends on the interest of safety the location of the crash and its proximity Strategies to the nearest emergency care facility, noting that the University of Vermont 1. Improve the availability and distribution of emergency medical Medical Center (formerly Fletcher Allen responders Health Care) located in Burlington is the 2. Improve the timeliness of EMS response and transport only Level 1 Trauma Center in Vermont. A Level 1 Trauma Center is capable of 3. Assess and improve the Vermont trauma system providing complete care for every aspect 4. Assess and improve the quality of clinical care provided to those of injury and designates trauma patients injured as its highest priority. 5. Improve intra-agency coordination during emergency response Important components of Vermont’s EMS 6. Create a culture of safety associated with emergency vehicle plan include the number of trauma care operation and emergency scene response. facilities in the State, reporting of detailed data for injured patients, funding 7. Conduct Traffic Incident Management Training for first to provide extensive training and responders to ensure that incident scenes are set up in the safest education for employees, and ongoing and most efficient manner possible data evaluation. These areas continually need to be assessed to determine what improvements can be made to ensure that the best emergency services can be provided to those in highway crashes. 28 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan ATTACHMENT A Office of Highway Safety Governor’s Highway Safety Program (GHSP) Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) Highway Safety Data Unit Vermont Highway Safety Alliance (VHSA) 29
Attachment A Highway safety impacts all of our lives each and every day. Whether we are commuting to work, taking kids to school and extra-curricular activities, driving to community events, or just going for a walk or bike ride, we all have one expectation and that is to leave home and return again unharmed. The sad fact is that each year roughly 340 people are killed or seriously injured on Vermont highways. In December 2014, VTrans formed the Office of Highway Safety (OHS) which is dedicated to reducing these tragedies on Vermont’s roadways. The OHS is made up of four separate units: Vermont Highway Safety Alliance, Governor’s Highway Safety Program, Highway Safety Improvement Program and Highway Safety Data Unit. Office Of Highway Safety Governor’s Highway Safety Program (GHSP) The GHSP focuses on the behavioral side of highway safety. It is estimated that 90% of all highway crashes are caused by driver error or poor behavior. GHSP works with public agencies, state and local enforcement departments, and educational non-profit groups to institute programs to address the behavioral issues that are rampant in society. The National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) provides funding which GHSP utilizes to mitigate problems identified in the yearly Highway Safety Plan (HSP). Yearly reports are provided to NHTSA outlining progress or remaining challenges in the area of crash reduction. Highway Safety Improvement Program (HSIP) The HSIP addresses problematic areas on the physical roadway infrastructure system across Vermont. Recent crash data is analyzed to determine the specific areas and locations that need to be addressed. In addition to specific locations, the HSIP identifies systemic problems by analyzing similar causal crash factors and crash characteristics. Utilizing this analysis, staff look for ways to implement statewide changes to the highway system to combat the systemic issues. To meet the MAP21 and FAST ACT requirements, Vermont defines a high risk rural road (HRRR) as any roadway functionally classified as a rural major or minor collector or rural local road that has three or more fatal and injury crashes per mile over a five-year period. Highway Safety Data Unit The Highway Safety Data Unit is the repository of all crash data statewide. All state and local enforcement agencies and departments send electronic crash reports to this unit. These reports are checked for quality and then added to the state database. Enforcement agencies, engineers, and local communities rely on this data to make informed decisions on solving highway safety issues in the most effective way. This group provides the barometer by which we measure the safety health of our Vermont Highway System. 30 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Attachment A Vermont Highway Safety Alliance (VHSA) The VHSA is a non-profit organization whose sole focus is to reduce needless crashes on Vermont’s highways. Public agencies, and private individuals and companies make up the VHSA membership. The Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) is the guiding document which, via crash data, identifies the areas that need to be addressed. The VHSA consists of a Board of Directors, an Advisory Council, and Task Force (TF) groups. The VHSA Board of 15 members define the Strategic Highway Safety Plan (SHSP) for the State of Vermont and determine the Critical Emphasis Areas (CEAs). The Highway Safety Plan Coordinator works with the VHSA Advisory Council to determine the high level strategies to be employed in an effort to meet the crash reduction goals set for the individual CEAs. The Advisory Council consists of Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) in each of the critical areas with regard to highway safety. Standing members of the Council are the VHSA Board of Directors, Chair and Vice Chair, as well as the Highway Safety Plan Coordinator. The Advisory Council will implement specific action plans guided by the strategies in accordance with the course set by the Board of Directors and will deploy Task Force teams to complete specific small, medium, and large projects targeted to reduce crashes. An effort will be made to make these groups multi-disciplinary in order to address the needs of all highway users. Subject Matter Experts The SMEs play a critical role on the Task Force teams to engage, advise, and lead on specific projects and are encouraged to send new program suggestions to the advisory board for consideration. Monthly scheduled meetings and ongoing communication with the SMEs are planned to help keep the VHSA active, vibrant, and effective. 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 31
Attachment A 32 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan ATTACHMENT B Glossary 33
Attachment B Glossary AAA American Automobile Association AARP American Association of Retired Persons AC Advisory Council Alliance Vermont Highway Safety Alliance CCRPC Chittenden County Regional Planning Commission CEA Critical Emphasis Area DMV Department of Motor Vehicles DWI Driving While Impaired EMS Emergency Medical Services FHWA Federal Highway Administration Four E’s (4 E’s) Education, Enforcement, Engineering, and Emergency Services FMCSA Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration FFY Federal Fiscal Year FY Fiscal Year GDL Graduated Driver’s License GHSP Governor’s Highway Safety Program HRRR High Risk Rural Roads HSIP Highway Safety Improvement Program HSP Highway Safety Plan Major Crash Fatal or Incapacitating Injury Crash NHTSA National Highway Traffic Safety Administration OHS Office of Highway Safety SEA Significant Emphasis Area SHSP Strategic Highway Safety Plan SME Subject Matter Experts Safety PM Safety Performance Management TPM Transportation Performance Management TZD Toward Zero Deaths 34 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan
Attachment B VHSA Vermont Highway Safety Alliance VSP Vermont State Police VTrans Vermont Agency of Transportation 2017-2021 | Vermont Strategic Highway Safety Plan 35
VERMONT Strategic Highway Safety Plan 2017-2021
You can also read