Urticaria and increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study in European population - Oxford Academic ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Modern Rheumatology, 00, 2021, 1–5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/mr/roab052 Advance access publication date: 1 September 2021 Original Article Urticaria and increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis: a two-sample Mendelian randomisation study in European population Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mr/roab052/6360891 by guest on 10 December 2021 Xue Yua , Ming-Gang Dengb , Zi-Ying Tangc and Zhi-Jiang Zhanga,* a Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China b Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China c Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China *Correspondence: Zhi-Jiang Zhang; zhang22968@163.com; Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Wuhan University, 115 Donghu Road, Wuhan 430071, China. ABSTRACT Background: In recent years, a growing body of observational studies suggest that urticaria is associated with a higher risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the causal association between urticaria and RA remains unknown. Objective: To investigate the causal relationship of urticaria and RA in European populations by Mendelian randomisation (MR) approach. Methods: We conducted two-sample MR analyses. Eleven single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with urticaria were used as instrumental variables. The summary data on urticaria were derived from FinnGen Data Freeze 2. The summary data on RA were obtained from a published meta-analysis using European samples. Four MR methods were applied to the MR estimates. Three heterogeneity tests, including Cochran’s Q test, single variant analysis, and leave-one-out variant analysis, were used. The pleiotropy and horizontal pleiotropy among instrumental variables were assessed with MR-Egger regression intercept, MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier global test, and PhenoScanner. Results: The MR analysis suggested that urticaria was causally associated with RA (odds ratio = 1.114, 95% confidence interval = 1.024–1.211, p = .011). No genetic pleiotropy or horizontal pleiotropy was revealed by MR-Egger regression intercept and MR pleiotropy residual sum and outlier global test. The sensitivity analysis results were relatively robust. Conclusions: The MR analysis suggested there was sufficient evidence to indicate urticaria is the cause of RA. KEYWORDS: Mendelian randomisation; urticaria; rheumatoid arthritis; genetics; causal relationship Introduction urticaria patients have autoimmune diseases, which include Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is an autoimmune disease charac- RA [15]. terised by joint involvement and inflammatory arthritis [1]. Whether the relationship between urticaria and RA is The common extra-articular manifestations involve malaise, causal remains unclear because of the reverse causation and fever, weight loss, and skin symptoms [2, 3]. It is estimated confounding bias in observational studies. Mendelian ran- that 23.7 million people worldwide are suffering from RA domisation (MR) is a widely used epidemiological method [4]. RA imposes considerable individual burden and socioe- that can use genetic variants as instrumental variables (IVs) conomic burden on patients [5, 6]. Early diagnosis of RA to explore whether there is a causal relationship between the is paramount since that may prevent disease development or exposure and the outcome [16]. As alleles are independently even stop the disease [7]. As a result, early identification of assigned randomly at meiosis, MR can limit both typical con- risk factors for RA is the key to preventing and treating RA. founding factors and reverse causation, providing stronger Urticaria is a common disease, which is characterised evidence of causal inference [17]. Herein, we assess the by wheals and angioedema [8]. The available data suggest causal direction of the association between urticaria and RA urticaria can cause a decrease in the quality of life and increase in European ancestry population using the two-sample MR societal costs of health hazards [9, 10, 11, 12]. In recent years, analysis. a growing body of evidence suggests that urticaria has been linked to autoimmune diseases, including RA [13]. One reg- istry study has revealed that chronic urticaria may develop Materials and methods into RA. And a retrospective cohort study has reported that All participants provided written informed consent for the incidence of RA was higher in patients with urticaria than participation in the study as approved by the ethical commit- those without urticaria [14]. A follow-up of 100 individuals tees of each of the institutional review boards. Our analyses with chronic urticaria found it was estimated that 21% of in the study were based on publicly available genome-wide Received 19 March 2021; Accepted 29 July 2021 © Japan College of Rheumatology 2021. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com
2 Yu et al. association study (GWAS) summary statistics, and no addi- the individual IV. Then, we used the two-sample MR to assess tional ethical approval and informed consent were required. the potential causal relationship of urticaria on RA, includ- ing four MR methods: inverse variance weighted (IVW), Instrumental variable selection weighted median (WM), MR-Egger, and MR pleiotropy resid- For a causal interpretation of MR analysis to be valid, three ual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) [21–24]. We used the key assumptions must be satisfied (Figure 1). Briefly, (1) these IVW method, which assumes all IVs must satisfy the three genetic variants should be robustly associated with urticaria, key assumptions of MR method. Other MR approaches, i.e. (2) be not associated with any confounders of the urticarial MR-Egger, WM, and MR-PRESSO, were also compared with RA, and (3) influence RA only through the effect of urticaria. the IVW method. The MR-Egger method gives an unbiased We selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associ- estimate if genetic pleiotropy is present. The WM method Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mr/roab052/6360891 by guest on 10 December 2021 ated with urticaria from GWAS summary statistics. First, orders the MR estimates of each IV weighted for the inverse since few loci identified by urticaria GWAS have achieved of their variance, and this method assumes that at least half a genome-wide significance, we selected 74 SNPs with sug- of the IVs are effective. MR-PRESSO test removed outliers to gestive genome-wide significance (p < 1 × 10−5 ). Second, we reduce heterogeneity and the effect of horizontal pleiotropy. clumped these 74 SNPs to remove the linkage disequilibrium We performed heterogeneity tests, including Cochran’s Q (r2 = 0.01, kb = 5000). A total of 11 independent SNPs associ- test [25], single-variant analysis, and leave-one-out variant ated with urticaria were identified. Third, the R2 value of each analysis [26]. MR-PRESSO was used to identify outliers. And SNP was used to assess the proportion of variance in urticaria. we used MR-Egger regression intercept to examine the direc- F-statistic was used to estimate the instrument strength of each tional pleiotropy. Besides, the MR-PRESSO global test was SNP [18]. Last, we used proxy SNPs to replace the unavail- used to examine the horizontal pleiotropy among IVs. In able SNPs. Palindromic variant would not be excluded if it addition, we investigated pleiotropy by looking up each SNP would not incur ambiguity. in PhenoScanner (www.phenoscanner.medschl.cam.ac.uk/) [27, 28] with the settings p < 1 × 10−5 and inclusion of proxy variants in linkage disequilibrium (LD) (r2 > 0.8) to evaluate Data sources the risk factors for RA, i.e. smoking [29], silica [30], vitamin The GWAS summary data of urticaria were derived from D [31], and body mass index [32]. Also, we inputted the IVs FinnGen Data Freeze 2 (https://finngen.gitbook.io/docume associated with urticaria to determine the associations with ntation.GWASID:finn-a-L12_URTICARIA). FinnGen Data metabolites and disease traits. Finally, the obtained results of Freeze 2 has been released to public on 14 January 2020. It MR methods and leave-one-out variant analysis are visualised consists of 96,499 individuals, 16,152,119 variants, and 1122 in the form of forest plot and scatter plot. endpoints. The GWAS summary data of urticaria included The result of MR analysis was presented as odds ratio (OR) 96,018 (1860 cases and 94,158 controls) samples of Euro- with 95% confidence interval (CI). All analyses were per- pean ancestry. All reported genomic coordinates were in formed by the TwoSampleMR packages (Version 0.5.5) and HG19/GRCh37. MR-PRESSO packages (Version 1.0) with R (Version 4.0.3). The data on RA were accessed from a GWAS meta-analysis using European samples [19]. This GWAS meta-analysis was conducted in a total of >100,000 subjects (29,880 RA cases Results and 73,758 controls) by evaluating ∼10 million SNPs. All RA We included 11 SNPs as IVs of urticaria in this MR analysis cases fulfilled the 1987 criteria of the American College of explaining about 0.24% of the variance in the risk of urticaria. Rheumatology for RA diagnosis [20]. In order to minimise The data of 11 urticaria-associated SNPs are presented in population stratification, only European continental ancestry Supplementary Table S1. The median value of F-statistic was groups were included in our analysis. The summary statistics 21 (range 20–23). Since all F-statistics were greater than 10, data for RA in European ancestry included 2843 cases and suggesting that IVs were strong predictors of endogenous vari- 5540 controls. Biobank Japan Project provides this summary ables. Two SNPs (rs79654727 and rs17281228) were not statistics. presented in the RA dataset. And one palindromic variant (rs17391162) was not excluded since it would not incur ambi- Statistical analysis guity while inferring the strand. No proxy SNP was identified. First, the Wald ratio (the ratio of SNP-outcome estimate to Besides, we found no SNPs associated with the risk factor of SNP-exposure estimate) was used to derive MR estimates of RA. Finally, a total of 9 SNPs were available for this MR analysis (Supplementary Table S2). The results between urticaria and RA obtained from the MR analysis were listed in Table 1. The result of the IVW method suggested that urticaria was associated with the increased risk of RA (OR = 1.114, 95% CI = 1.024–1.211, Table 1. MR estimates of urticaria on RA from four methods. Method IVs (SNPs) OR (95%CI) p MR-Egger 9 1.089 (0.879–1.349) .460 WM 9 1.125 (1.002–1.262) .047 IVW 9 1.114 (1.024–1.211) .011 MR-PRESSO 9 1.114 (1.024–1.211) .035 Figure 1. Schematic of the MR study and key assumptions.
Urticaria and increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis 3 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mr/roab052/6360891 by guest on 10 December 2021 Figure 2. Forest plot of urticaria-associated SNPs potential effects on RA. This figure displays the forest plot of pooled MR estimates and individual estimate between IV and the risk for RA. The spots represent the MR effect size for urticaria on rheumatoid arthritis. Table 2. The heterogeneity across all instrumental variables (Cochran’s Q test). Method Q Q_df Q_pval MR-Egger 8.038 7 .329 IVW 8.096 8 .424 IV and the risk for RA. Figure 3 shows a scatter plot of MR results. The Cochran’s Q test suggested that the effect esti- mates across all IVs were no heterogeneity (QEgger = 8.038, pEgger = .329, QIVW = 8.096, pIVW = .424, Table 2). The MR-Egger regression intercept showed no directional pleiotropy for the association between urticaria and RA (MR-Egger = 0.005, p = .828). Likewise, MR-PRESSO global Figure 3. Scatter plot of urticaria-associated SNPs potential effects on test showed no horizontal pleiotropy among individual SNPs RA. These black dots represent the individual IV association with urticaria of urticaria for RA (p = .455). MR-PRESSO did not iden- risk plotted against the individual IV association with RA. Vertical and tify any outliers for IVs. The results obtained from the horizontal lines present the 95% CI of OR for each IV. The slope of lines phenoscanner are set out in Supplementary Table S3. Out of represents the estimated causal effect of MR methods. the nine SNPs variants genetically associated with urticaria, four SNPs were located in the intron region of the fol- p = .011), and the result was supported using the MR- lowing genes, PIP5K1B, AKAP13, KDM4C, and C12orf75; PRESSO method (OR = 1.114, 95% CI = 1.024–1.211, two SNPs were located in the intergenic region of RP11- p = .035). The WM result was in agreement with the 173M1.5 and CD200R1L; one SNP was located missense of result of the IVW method (OR = 1.125, 95% CI = 1.002– the MUM1 gene; also, one SNP was located downstream of 1.262, p = .047). Although the MR-Egger method showed the CSN3 gene; and one SNP was located 3_prime_UTR of broader CIs due to lower statistical power but sug- the CBLB gene. Most of the SNPs had no known disease gested the same direction of effect (OR = 1.089, 95% associations. Analysis using PhenoScanner in the metabolites CI = 0.879–1.349, p = .460). We calculated the individual option showed that none of the nine SNPs was associated and pooled MR estimates. Figure 2 displays the forest plot with any metabolites. Further analysis using PhenoScanner of pooled MR estimates and individual estimate between in the diseases and traits option showed that none of the
4 Yu et al. nine SNPs were associated with any risk factor for RA. analysis. Second, the databases are European ancestry; thus, One SNP, rs1676583, was associated with unspecified t-cell our findings may not be extrapolated to other races. Third, lymphomas, but the results of leave-one-out sensitivity anal- data are limited on GWAS for specific types of urticaria. ysis (Supplementary Figure S1) did not suggest a significant Whether any specific type of urticaria has a causal relationship influence. with RA warrants further investigation. Last, the non-linear association of urticaria and RA could not be evaluated as the MR analysis assumes a linear association between the Discussion exposure and outcome. Previous studies have investigated the link between urticaria and RA. Some studies support the view that RA is one of the Conclusions Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mr/roab052/6360891 by guest on 10 December 2021 most common manifestations of urticaria-like lesions [33–35]. These results suggest that urticaria increases the risk of RA in For example, one registry-study has revealed that chronic Europeans. Further exploration of the molecular mechanisms urticaria may develop into RA [36]. And a retrospective is needed to account for the relationship between urticaria and cohort study has reported that the incidence of RA was higher RA. in patients with urticaria than those without urticaria [14]. A follow-up of 100 individuals with chronic urticaria found it was estimated that 21% of urticaria patients have autoim- Acknowledgements mune diseases, which include RA [15]. Besides, some studies The authors sincerely appreciate Biobank Japan Project and have reported patients of urticaria lesions associated with FinnGen study related investigators for sharing GWAS sum- arthritis [37, 38]. Together, these studies provide important mary statistics. insights into a possible epidemiological link between urticaria and RA. These results are in accord with our findings. However, these results must be interpreted with caution Supplementary data because observational studies might cause spurious associa- Supplementary data is available at Modern Rheumatology tions and present residual confounders [39]. As a result, we online. used the two-sample MR analysis to assess whether there is a causal association between urticaria and RA in European ancestry. Conflict of interest There was no evidence of horizontal pleiotropy or hetero- None declared. geneity across instrumental SNPs via MR analysis. Therefore, we give priority to the results of IVW method, which is without regard to the intercept of the regression [40]. It is Funding noteworthy that our study found urticaria can elevate the This work was financially supported by the National Natural risk of RA. These results confirm a causal relation between Science Foundation of China (grant number 81641123) and urticaria and RA. Taken together, these results suggest that the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities patients in urticaria are easier to get RA. Given the causal (grant number 2042017kf0193). link, we recommended that RA prevention, management, and treatment should be enhanced for urticaria prevention. Authors’ contributions One biological mechanism may explain the increased risk of RA associated with urticaria. Mast cells are the primary Z.J.Z. designed the study and edited the manuscript. X.Y. effector cell of urticarial, and they play an ongoing role in the performed the statistical analysis and drafted the manuscript. arthritic process [41, 42]. However, further work is required M.G.D. and Z.Y.T. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All to better explore the mechanisms underlying urticaria and RA. authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted There are several strengths of this study. First, this study version. reported for the first time a causal relationship between urticaria and RA using a two-sample MR approach. And References the MR approach utilises a large sample data to enhance [1] Carbone F, Bonaventura A, Liberale L et al. Atherosclerosis in the reliability of this study. Furthermore, we used strong IVs rheumatoid arthritis: promoters and opponents. Clin Rev Allergy (all F-statistics are >10) to reduce variation and biased esti- Immunol 2020;58:1–14. mates. Second, our study reduces the bias of population [2] Lora V, Cerroni L, Cota C. Skin manifestations of rheumatoid stratification since it was limited to European-descent popula- arthritis. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2018;153:243–55. tions. Third, four complementary MR methods were used to [3] Grassi W, De Angelis R, Lamanna G et al. The clinical features of reduce the influence from confounders and reverse causality. rheumatoid arthritis. Eur J Radiol 1998;27:S18–24. Moreover, we chose independent SNPs as IVs to maximally [4] World Health Organization. The Global Burden of Disease: reduce the interference of linkage disequilibrium. Finally, 2004 Update 2004 9 February 2021, https://www.who.int/ there is little evidence of pleiotropy for the IVs, and the sen- publications/i/item/9789241563710. [5] Kitas GD, Gabriel SE. Cardiovascular disease in rheumatoid arthri- sitivity analysis result was robust, demonstrating our findings tis: state of the art and future perspectives. Ann Rheum Dis are reliable. 2011;70:8–14. In contrast, our research has limitations as well. First, [6] Sokka T, Kautiainen H, Pincus T et al. Work disability remains due to the genetic loci identified in urticaria GWAS being a major problem in rheumatoid arthritis in the 2000s: data limited, we used a relaxed criterion of p < 1 × 10−5 for an IV- from 32 countries in the QUEST-RA study. Arthritis Res Ther exposure association, which limits the statistical power of MR 2010;12:R42.
Urticaria and increased risk of rheumatoid arthritis 5 [7] Scott DL, Wolfe F, Huizinga TW. Rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet randomization between complex traits and diseases. Nat Genet 2010;376:1094–108. 2018;50:693–8. [8] Zuberbier T, Aberer W, Asero R et al. The EAACI/ [25] Kulinskaya E, Dollinger MB. An accurate test for homogeneity GA2 LEN/EDF/WAO guideline for the definition, classi- of odds ratios based on Cochran’s Q-statistic. BMC Med Res fication, diagnosis and management of urticaria. Allergy Methodol 2015;15:49. 2018;73:1393–414. [26] Burgess S, Thompson SG. Interpreting findings from Mendelian [9] Maurer M, Staubach P, Raap U et al. ATTENTUS, a German randomization using the MR-Egger method. Eur J Epidemiol online survey of patients with chronic urticaria highlighting the 2017;32:377–89. burden of disease, unmet needs and real-life clinical practice. Br J [27] Staley JR, Blackshaw J, Kamat MA et al. PhenoScanner: a Dermatol 2016;174:892–4. database of human genotype-phenotype associations. Bioinfor- [10] Maurer M, Staubach P, Raap U et al. H1-antihistamine-refractory matics 2016;32:3207–9. Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mr/advance-article/doi/10.1093/mr/roab052/6360891 by guest on 10 December 2021 chronic spontaneous urticaria: it’s worse than we thought - first [28] Kamat MA, Blackshaw JA, Young R et al. PhenoScanner V2: an results of the multicenter real-life AWARE study. Clin Exp Allergy expanded tool for searching human genotype-phenotype associa- 2017;47:684–92. tions. Bioinformatics 2019;35:4851–3. [11] Bumbăcea RS, Deaconu CG, Berghea EC. Management problems [29] Arnson Y, Shoenfeld Y, Amital H. Effects of tobacco smoke in severe chronic inducible urticaria: two case reports. EXP THER on immunity, inflammation and autoimmunity. J Autoimmun MED 2019;18:960–3. 2010;34:J258–65. [12] Maurer M, Abuzakouk M, Bérard F et al. The burden of chronic [30] Stolt P, Yahya A, Bengtsson C et al. Silica exposure among male spontaneous urticaria is substantial: real-world evidence from current smokers is associated with a high risk of developing ACPA- ASSURE-CSU. Allergy 2017;72:2005–16. positive rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis 2010;69:1072–6. [13] Confino-Cohen R, Chodick G, Shalev V et al. Chronic urticaria [31] Merlino LA, Curtis J, Mikuls TR et al. Vitamin D intake is and autoimmunity: associations found in a large population study. inversely associated with rheumatoid arthritis: results from the J Allergy Clin Immunol 2012;129:1307–13. Iowa Women’s Health Study. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:72–7. [14] Yong SB, Chen HH, Huang JY et al. Patients with urticaria [32] Linauskas A, Overvad K, Symmons D et al. Body fat per- are at a higher risk of anaphylaxis: a nationwide population- centage, waist circumference, and obesity as risk factors for based retrospective cohort study in Taiwan. J Dermatol 2018;45: rheumatoid arthritis: a Danish cohort study. Arthritis Care Res 1088–93. 2019;71:777–86. [15] Dionigi PC, Menezes MC, Forte WC. A prospective ten- [33] Ziemer M, Müller AK, Hein G et al. Incidence and classifica- year follow-up of patients with chronic urticaria. Allergol tion of cutaneous manifestations in rheumatoid arthritis. J Dtsch Immunopathol 2016;44:286–91. Dermatol Ges 2016;14:1237–46. [16] Smith GD, Ebrahim S. ‘Mendelian randomization’: can genetic [34] Xue Y, Cohen JM, Wright NA et al. Skin signs of rheumatoid epidemiology contribute to understanding environmental determi- arthritis and its therapy-induced cutaneous side effects. Am J Clin nants of disease? Int J Epidemiol 2003;32:1–22. Dermatol 2016;17:147–62. [17] Lawlor DA, Harbord RM, Sterne JA et al. Mendelian randomiza- [35] Hata T, Kavanaugh A. Rheumatoid arthritis in dermatology. Clin tion: using genes as instruments for making causal inferences in Dermatol 2006;24:430–7. epidemiology. Stat Med 2008;27:1133–63. [36] Ghazanfar MN, Kibsgaard L, Thomsen SF et al. Risk of comor- [18] Pierce BL, Ahsan H, Vanderweele TJ. Power and instrument bidities in patients diagnosed with chronic urticaria: a nationwide strength requirements for Mendelian randomization studies using registry-study. World Allergy Organ J 2020;13:100097. multiple genetic variants. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40:740–52. [37] Ghazanfar MN, Thomsen SF. Combined treatment with oma- [19] Okada Y, Wu D, Trynka G et al. Genetics of rheumatoid lizumab and etanercept in a patient with chronic sponta- arthritis contributes to biology and drug discovery. Nature neous urticaria and rheumatoid arthritis. J Dermatolog Treat 2014;506:376–81. 2019;30:387–8. [20] Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA et al. The American Rheuma- [38] Spector J, Lilly S, Nemirovsky D et al. Prodromal urticaria tism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of with seronegative rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Rheumatol rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315–24. 1997;3:234–6. [21] Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson SG. Mendelian randomiza- [39] Davey SG, Hemani G. Mendelian randomization: genetic anchors tion analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Hum Mol Genet Genet Epidemiol 2013;37:658–65. 2014;23:R89–98. [22] Bowden J, Davey SG, Haycock PC et al. Consistent estimation in [40] Bowden J, Del GMF, Minelli C et al. A framework for the inves- Mendelian randomization with some invalid instruments using a tigation of pleiotropy in two-sample summary data Mendelian weighted median estimator. Genet Epidemiol 2016;40:304–14. randomization. Stat Med 2017;36:1783–802. [23] Bowden J, Davey SG, Burgess S. Mendelian randomization with [41] Schwartz LB. Mast cells and their role in urticaria. J Am Acad invalid instruments: effect estimation and bias detection through Dermatol 1991;25:203–4. Egger regression. Int J Epidemiol 2015;44:512–25. [42] Lee DM, Friend DS, Gurish MF et al. Mast cells: a cellular [24] Verbanck M, Chen CY, Neale B et al. Detection of widespread hor- link between autoantibodies and inflammatory arthritis. Science izontal pleiotropy in causal relationships inferred from Mendelian 2002;297:1689–92.
You can also read