Tulsi Gabbard Is Driving The MSM Crazy - Consortiumnews

Tulsi Gabbard Is Driving The MSM Crazy
The newly minted presidential candidate is serving as a
lightning rod for the debate about U.S. warmongering,
writes Caitlin Johnstone.

By Caitlin Johnstone
CaitlinJohnstone.com

          When   Hawaii’s Rep. Tulsi Gabbard announced her
          plans to run in the 2020 presidential election, I
          predicted that it would disrupt war propaganda
          narratives and force a much-needed conversation
about U.S. interventionism, but I didn’t realize that it
would happen so quickly, so ubiquitously and so explosively.
Gabbard officially began her campaign for president a little
over a week ago, and already she’s become the front line
upon which the debate about U.S. warmongering is happening.

This dynamic became more apparent than ever in Gabbard’s
recent appearance on MSNBC’s Morning Joe, hosted by spouses
Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski.

It should here be noted since we’re talking about war
propaganda that in 2009 Scarborough turned down an easy run
for the U.S. Senate because he decided that he could have
more influence on public policy as the host of Morning
Joe than he could as one of 100 U.S. senators, which tells
you everything you need to know about why I focus more on
U.S. mass media propaganda than I do on U.S. politics. It
should also be noted that Brzezinski is the daughter of the
late Carter administration Cold Warrior Zbigniew Brzezinski,
whose influential ideas about U.S. world domination, arming

extremist factions to advance U.S. interests, and hawkish
agendas against Russia continue to infect U.S. foreign
policy to this day. Mika is part of a political dynasty,
with both brothers being U.S. political insiders as well.

Aligning the Message

So if you’ve ever wondered how outlets like MSNBC keep
everyone on message and fully in alignment with the U.S. war
machine’s agendas, there’s a good insight into how. Combine
that with the way they stock their punditry lineup with U.S.
intelligence community insiders and fire any pundit who
refuses to toe the military-industrial complex line, and
it’s not hard to see how they’ve developed such a tight echo
chamber    of   hostility       toward     any    resistance       to    U.S.
interventionism. Which explains what we’re about to discuss
next.

 The journalist interrogating Tulsi seems to believe that US forces in Syria
 are fighting Assad. Tulsi corrects her, says those troops were deployed there
 to fight ISIS. These people don’t even know what’s happening in the places
 they want the US to occupy pic.twitter.com/YWIbSVqePA

 — Rania Khalek (@RaniaKhalek) February 6, 2019

Morning Joe’s pile-on began when the subject of Syria came
up, and panelist Kasie Hunt instantly became agitated.

“Do you think Assad is our enemy?” Hunt interrupted during
Gabbard’s response to a question about her meeting with
Syria’s president in 2017, her voice and face both strained
with emotion.

“Assad is not the enemy of the United States because Syria
does not pose a direct threat to the United States,” Gabbard
replied.

“What do you say to Democratic voters who watched you go
over there, and what do you say to military members who have
been deployed repeatedly in Syria pushing back against
Assad?” Hunt asked, somehow believing that U.S. soldiers are
in Syria fighting against the Syrian government, which would
probably come as a shock to the troops who’ve been told that
they are there to defeat ISIS.

Journalist      Rania   Khalek   summed   up   this   insanity
perfectly, tweeting, “The journalist interrogating Tulsi
seems to believe that U.S. forces in Syria are fighting
Assad. Tulsi corrects her, says those troops were deployed
there to fight ISIS. These people don’t even know what’s
happening in the places they want the U.S. to occupy.”

Journalist Max Blumenthal agreed with Khalek in a response
to her tweet.

This is such an embarrassing look at the state of corporate American regime
 media. @kasie doesn’t know the most basic facts about Syria and along with the
 smug co-hosts, doesn’t care to learn. https://t.co/dEfJbVEcaD

 — Max Blumenthal (@MaxBlumenthal) February 6, 2019

And it didn’t get any better from there. After Gabbard took
some time to explain to a professional cable news reporter
the basic fundamentals of the U.S. military’s official
involvement in Syria, Scarborough interjected to ask if
Assad isn’t an enemy, would Gabbard at least concede that he
is “an adversary of the United States.”

Whatever that means. What Assad is is the leader of a
sovereign nation which has nothing to do with the United
States and isn’t taking anything from or harming the United
States in any way.

Back and Forth

Scarborough and Gabbard went back and forth about this
stupid, nonsensical question before Brzezinski interjected
to ask “So what would you say he is to the United States? If
you cannot say that he’s an adversary or an enemy, what is
Assad to the U.S.? What is the word?”

“You can describe it however you want to describe it,”
Gabbard responded, explaining that whether a nation is
adversarial or not comes down to whether or not they are
working against U.S. interests.

“Are Assad’s interests aligned with ours?” asked Hunt.

“What are Assad’s interests?” Gabbard countered.

“Assad seems interested primarily in the slaughter of his

own people,” Hunt replied with a straight face.

“Survival,” Scarborough interjected, trying to save his
colleague some embarrassment with a less insane response to
the question of Assad’s interests.

Other Crazy Questions

Other     crazy   questions   Gabbard   was   asked   during   her
appearance include the following:

“You know there are people who will watch this have heard
your previous comments who will wonder, what’s going on
here? Why you met with Assad, why it looks like you were
very cozy with Assad and why you’ve sort of taken his side
in this argument. What would you say to that?”

“Do you think that Assad is a good person?”

“Your hometown paper said that you should focus on your job
and talked about your presidential campaign being in
disarray. How would you respond to your hometown paper?”

“Any idea why David Duke came out and supported you?”

“There have been reports that that Russian apparatus that
interfered in 2016 is potentially trying to help your
campaign. Why do you think that is?”

“Have you met with any Russians over the past several
years?”

Gabbard shoved back against the various accusations of
alignment         with    Trump,        Putin    and      Assad,
asserting correctly that those lines are only being used to
smear anyone who voices an objection to endless war and

insane nuclear escalations. She pushed back particularly
hard on Kasie Hunt’s reference to the obscene NBC smear
piece which cited the discredited narrative control firm New
Knowledge to paint Gabbard as a favorite of the Kremlin,
claiming that the article has been thoroughly debunked (and
it has).

After the show, still unable to contain herself, Hunt jumped
onto Twitter to share the discredited NBC smear piece.

 Here is ?@NBCNews?’ excellent reporting on the Russian machine that now
 appears to be boosting Tulsi Gabbard https://t.co/QuJRuEQHOm

 — Kasie Hunt (@kasie) February 6, 2019

Hunt then followed up with a link to an RT article which she
captioned with an outright lie: “Here is the ‘debunking’ of
the NBC News report from RT, the Russian state media. You
tell me which you think is more credible.”

I say that Hunt is lying because the RT article that she
shared to falsely claim that the only objection to NBC’s
smear piece came from Russia explicitly names an Intercept
article by American journalist Glenn Greenwald, upon which
the RT article is based and which does indeed thoroughly
discredit the NBC smear piece. If Hunt had read the article
that she shared, she necessarily would have known that, so
she was either lying about the nature of the article she
shared or lying about knowing what was in it.

 MSNBC defended @nbcnews fraudulent "report" which was based on a "discredited
 cyber security firm recently kicked off Facebook for unethical MEDDLING of a
 state election.” Shameful "journalism." https://t.co/YjGSKKE6oR

 — Tulsi Gabbard (@TulsiGabbard) February 7, 2019

So that was nuts. We can expect to see a whole, whole lot
more of this as the plutocratic media works overtime to
undermine Gabbard’s message in order to keep her from
disrupting establishment war narratives, and I’m pleased as
punch to see Gabbard firing back and calling them out for
the sleazy war propagandists that they are. Her presidential
campaign is shaking the foundations of the establishment
narrative control matrix more than anything else that’s
going on right now, so it looks like writing about these
embarrassing mass media debacles she’s been provoking may be
a big part of my job in the coming months.

Military interventionism is by far the most depraved and
destructive   aspect    of   the   U.S.-centralized      power
establishment, and it is also the most lucrative and
strategically crucial, which is why so much energy is poured
into ensuring that the American people don’t use the power
of their numbers to force that interventionism to end.

Anyone who throws a monkey wrench in the works of this
propaganda machine is going to be subjected to a tremendous
amount of smears, and I’m glad to see Gabbard fighting back
against those smears. From personal experience I know that
smear campaigns must be fought against ferociously, because
the only alternative is to allow your detractors to control
the narrative about you, which as far as your message goes
is the same as allowing them to control you.

Caitlin Johnstone is a rogue journalist, poet, and utopia
prepper who publishes regularly at Medium. Follow her work
on Facebook, Twitter, or her website. She has a podcast and
a new book “Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.” This
article was re-published with permission.