The Justice System and Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Justice System and Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders Selen Siringil Perker, LLM, Lael E. H. Chester, JD Young adults’ heightened vulnerability to substance use disorders (SUD) corresponds with abstract their disproportionate representation in the criminal justice system. It is paramount that the justice system systemically recognize young adults as a group with distinct developmental needs and align reform efforts with advancements made in medical and public health fields to better address the needs of justice-involved young adults with SUD. This article warns against reliance on the justice system for engaging young adults with SUD in treatment and presents 4 principles that were developed by a workgroup participating in a longitudinal meeting of experts sponsored by Boston Medical Center’s Grayken Center for Addiction. The goal of the principles is to support and guide policy and practice initiatives for developmentally appropriate justice responses to young adults with SUD. The article also reviews the evidence that underlies these principles and offers policy and practice considerations for their implementation. Emerging Adult Justice Project, Justice Lab, Columbia University, New York, New York The guidelines and recommendations in this article are not American Academy of Pediatrics policy, and publication herein does not imply endorsement. Ms Siringil Perker conducted the literature review, analyzed published data, wrote the initial manuscript, and reviewed and revised the manuscript; Ms Chester reviewed and revised the manuscript; and all authors approved the final manuscript as submitted and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2020-023523H Accepted for publication Oct 23, 2020 Address correspondence to Selen Siringil Perker, LLM, Justice Lab, Columbia University, 475 Riverside Dr, Suite 316, New York, NY 10115. E-mail: ss5527@columbia.edu PEDIATRICS (ISSN Numbers: Print, 0031-4005; Online, 1098-4275). Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE: The authors have indicated they have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. FUNDING: No external funding. POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST: The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose. Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 147, number s2, January 2021:e2020023523H SUPPLEMENT ARTICLE
Young adults, individuals 18 to adults mature and age out of crime as practice and policy considerations, 25 years of age also defined as their cognitive skills develop, including potential obstacles to emerging adults, are at the epicenter responsibility and independence implementation and action steps to of both the current drug epidemic grow, and social ties strengthen inform key stakeholders. and mass incarceration crisis. Young through education, stable adults suffer the highest prevalence employment, and committed PRINCIPLES OF CARE of illicit drug use of any age group1,2; relationships.19–21 Unfortunately for they are overrepresented in the most young adults involved in the Principle 1: To the Extent Possible, criminal justice system and justice system, these opportunities Young Adults With SUDs Should Be experience the worst justice may never exist and the criminal Diverted From the Criminal Justice outcomes of all age groups. Although justice system further limits their System to Effective Care young adults comprise 10% of the US prospects to reach these key Guidance population, in 2015 they constituted developmental milestones. An adult The workgroup acknowledged that 26% of arrests3 and 20% of adult criminal record creates barriers to SUDs are the entryway to the criminal incarcerations.4 Each day, an reentry, such as diminished access to justice system for a significant estimated 170 000 young adults are workforce, higher education, and safe number of young adults, yet SUD incarcerated in adult correctional housing. These collateral effects are treatment is most effective when facilities.5,6 Three out of 4 of these amplified for young adults, especially provided to youth in their own individuals will be rearrested within poor, young men of color, who face communities, before involvement 3 years of release.7 the worst disparities in the justice with the justice system. Diversion system.22,23 In fact, the United States’ refers to a broad category of justice The overlap between heightened experiment of a punitive, justice- initiatives that deflects individuals vulnerability of young adults to focused model for addressing SUDs away from the formal justice system substance use disorders (SUD) and has produced discriminatory into community services at key their disproportionate representation outcomes, widening racial and ethnic junctures of the criminal procedure, in the criminal justice system is not inequities.24 starting from prearrest police coincidental. Human brain development does not reliably reach diversion to latter alternatives to Fortunately, many areas of public adult levels of functioning until well sentencing. policy, including public health, into the third decade of life.8,9 increasingly recognize young Evidence Hallmarks of this development adulthood as a distinct developmental include risk taking, experimentation, Nationwide, drug abuse violation is stage, leading to laws and policies and a diminished future the leading cause of arrests for young specifically designed to protect this orientation.10,11 Young adults tend to adults.2 In 2017, drug abuse age group from harmful behavior. choose immediate, smaller rewards violations represented 22% of all Policy discussions around the country over future, larger ones.12 Young arrests for 18- to 20-year-olds in the are now focusing on reforming the adults are particularly volatile in United States and 19% for 21- to 24- justice system so that it recognizes emotionally charged settings, year-olds.25 Although the total the distinct developmental needs of especially with their peers.13 For number of arrests of young adults has young adults. In this article we some, this stage also marks the onset decreased substantially since 1990, present the 4 principles that were of mental health problems, self- greater numbers of young adults are developed by an expert workgroup medicating, or experimenting with being arrested for drug abuse participating in a longitudinal substances. Heavy drinking and drug violations today. The ratio of arrests meeting sponsored by Boston Medical use during adolescence and young for drug abuse violations to total Center’s Grayken Center for adulthood, in turn, adversely affect arrests in this age group has risen Addiction. The intent of these development of the brain and from 8% in 1990 to 20% in 2017. principles is to support and guide increase impulsivity.14–16 Young policy considerations for Of all drug-related violations, adults experience violent developmentally appropriate justice possession is the most frequent, victimization and emotional and responses to young adults with SUDs. accounting for 85% of all drug- physical trauma at higher rates than The recommendations in this article related arrests of young adults.26 any other population.17,18 Each of are not American Academy of These numbers underestimate the these risk factors is associated with Pediatrics policy, and publication actual role of substances in criminal involvement in the justice system. herein does not imply endorsement. justice involvement for young adults Young adulthood, however, is also We summarize the evidence since history of substance use is a time for opportunity. Most young underlying each principle, and share common among those sentenced for Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 S250 PERKER and CHESTER
other types of offenses.27,28 One study counseling sessions, and reporting (Gloucester, MA, 2015) help police found that 85% of all incarcerated regularly to probation officers. implement prearrest programs that individuals are substance-involved.29 Recently, these conditions have connect individuals with opioid increased in number.36 For young addiction to treatment. Communities Young adults arrested for drug abuse adults under probation that suffer that have joined PAARI have observed violations or other infringements from SUD – and who typically have as much as a 25% reduction in crimes with underlying SUD enter an adult not completed their formal education, associated with addiction.40 criminal justice system cycle that do not have stable employment, or starts with booking, and progresses lack other support systems – high Policy and Practice Considerations possibly through detention, rates of relapse and technical prosecution, conviction, and A number of obstacles persist for violation of other probation sentencing, including the possibility prearrest diversion of young adults. conditions are common.37 In part of community supervision or As a distinct age group, young adults because of the growth in the incarceration. This punitive approach pose specific challenges for probation population, most probation to individuals with SUDs, however, engagement in addiction treatment. agencies lack resources to deflect neither reduces crime nor saves There is a lack of sufficient, people who technically violate their lives.30 Police interactions can cause developmentally appropriate, probation conditions to drug more trauma and harm to youth that culturally responsive, and evidence- treatment, behavioral therapy, or already suffer from increased rates of based addiction treatment services employment programs. Instead, victimization and view law for young adults in most communities agencies default to formal violation enforcement with suspicion and across the United States. Only 1 out of processes, which often result in distrust.31 Interventions that rely on 3 young adults with opioid addiction incarceration.35 For young adults, this the justice system for engagement of receives medications to prevent means being subject to the toxic young adults with SUDs also a return to drug use.41 Youth of color environment of adult prisons, cutoff perpetuate systemic racial and women are significantly less from family and community supports, inequities.24 Black individuals are likely than others to be prescribed the and carrying a lifelong criminal incarcerated on drug charges at a rate appropriate medications.42 In the record. 10 times greater than white absence of effective nonpunitive individuals despite similar rates of alternatives for young adults, the Therefore, prearrest diversion of drug use.32 recourse to formal criminal justice young adults with SUDs from the system for treatment often prevails. formal criminal justice system is Individuals with SUDs who are Additionally, SUD frequently important. A number of programs, released from incarceration are more intersects with behavioral and mental such as Law Enforcement Assisted likely to recidivate and return to health problems, trauma and Diversion and the Police Assisted prison than other incarcerated victimization, and lack of adequate Addiction and Recovery Initiative persons: Nationwide, .50% of social support systems. Lack of cross- (PAARI), have shown promising incarcerated persons who are drug- agency collaboration between outcomes for diversion of adults with dependent have previously been addiction and mental health SUDs to effective treatment across the incarcerated, compared with 31% of professionals and social support country.38 In a Law Enforcement other incarcerated persons.30 systems constitutes a significant Assisted Diversion program, which Formerly incarcerated persons are at challenge for sustained recovery of started in King County, Washington, a strikingly higher risk for death from young adults from SUD. in 2011 and has been replicated in drug overdose than the general several other jurisdictions, police The expert panel identified a number population and formerly incarcerated officers exercise discretionary of actions that could be taken to emerging adults have the highest authority to divert individuals to address these obstacles. First, the mortality rate of all.33,34 community-based programs for law panel highlighted the need for Similarly, outcomes of individuals violations driven by underlying creating developmentally sentenced to probation, the most behavioral and mental health needs.39 appropriate, culturally sensitive, and frequently used sentence in criminal These programs offer a range of engaging (as opposed to coerced) court, are poor. Nationally, ∼40% of services that provide life skills, addiction treatment programs for those who are sentenced to probation employment opportunities, drug young adults in their communities have had their probation revoked.35 treatment, housing, and educational and facilitating early intervention Probation typically requires persons programs as an alternative to formal before involvement with the justice to adhere to a number of conditions, involvement with the criminal justice system. This should include such as being drug-free, attending system. The Angel Project and PAARI developing alternative engagement Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 147, number s2, January 2021 S251
strategies, such as wider use of as a developmentally distinct group. currently underway with support mentoring and peer support. Second, Young adults are thus treated as older from the National Institutes of stigma about medication-assisted adults without developmentally Health.47 Challenges remain, however, treatment (MAT) should be overcome appropriate services; (2) existing in tailoring addiction and mental and MAT within primary-care addiction treatment programs in the health programs in the justice system pediatric setting should be provided. adult criminal justice system are to the distinct needs of young adults. Increasing awareness about SUDs and insufficient to address SUDs across all In this context, a flurry of legislative treatment programs in schools, and age groups, but even more so for and policy initiatives has emerged facilitating school-based referrals to young adults. Both obstacles need to across the United States for young treatment programs in communities be addressed simultaneously. adult justice reform recently. One are important to address SUD before systemic reform is the expansion of a young adult gets involved in the Evidence juvenile jurisdiction to include some justice system. Third, collaboration Historically, the age of demarcation young adults.22,48 In 2018, Vermont between addiction, mental health between the juvenile and adult justice enacted a law that gradually raised professionals and social support systems has differed across the the upper age of juvenile jurisdiction systems should be strengthened for United States. Today, the majority of to a person’s 20th birthday by 2022. a holistic approach to treatment of states set the legal marker at A growing number of other states (eg, SUDs of young adults. These a person’s 18th birthday. Adult jails MA, IL, and CA) are considering programs should be “trauma-healing” and prisons, however, are not similar proposals. Extending juvenile in addition to being trauma-informed. equipped to provide developmentally alternatives to young adults means Finally, police referrals of young appropriate health care and addiction providing them with individualized adults with SUDs to community- treatment to young adults. rehabilitative services, including based treatment programs should be developmentally appropriate Evidence suggests that existing enhanced through adaptation of behavioral health services, addiction addiction treatment programs in the promising prearrest diversion models treatment, vocational training, and adult criminal justice system are to the distinct needs of young adults confidentiality protections. Other insufficient to address SUDs for all and through deliberate design and countries have been successfully age groups. Only 10% of incarcerated evaluation to reverse and prevent implementing such measures for individuals receive addiction systemic racial inequities in the years.49 treatment and most incarcerated justice system. These diversion persons who could benefit from Jurisdictions across the country have models should be promoted in new treatment do not receive it.43 Of those also been considering and hire training and continuing who receive treatment, evidence implementing other, more localized education of law enforcement suggests no significant reduction in policy initiatives for responding to officers. A wider array of other risk of fatal overdose after release.44 justice-involved young adults, such as diversion opportunities after arrest Most US correctional facilities do not specialized courts, specialized and throughout the criminal justice continue or initiate MAT, or they probation caseloads, and specialized process should be provided to provide only detoxification or correctional units, and the expansion respond to justice-involved young a subset of US Food and Drug of hybrid systems (which merge adults with SUDs. Administration–approved MAT (eg, elements of both the juvenile and Principle 2: Young Adults Who Have only methadone or buprenorphine).45 adult criminal justice systems). One SUDs and Are Subject to the Formal In addition, existing treatment such initiative that targets system- Justice System Should Have Access programs often lack quality metrics, involved youth with SUDs is to the Full Range of Developmentally are not standardized, and vary in specialized drug courts. In 2013, Appropriate, High Quality Addiction content and quality. Evidence from Massachusetts established 5 intensive Treatment Modalities During System a pilot study in Rhode Island suggests supervision programs to serve Involvement, Particularly During that SUD treatment programs offering justice-involved young adults, ages 18 Incarceration and Reentry all 3 US Food and Drug to 33, with SUDs.50 These programs Processes Administration–approved involve up to 3 weeks of daily Guidance medications (methadone, intensive outpatient treatment of Young adults with SUDs face 2 major buprenorphine, and naltrexone) addiction, followed by regular obstacles after being involved in during incarceration significantly meetings with the judge and a team of formal justice system: (1) justice reduce postrelease overdose case managers for individual and systems across the country do not deaths.46 A national study of SUD group counseling, and provision of systemically recognize young adults treatment models in justice settings is employment, education, and health Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 S252 PERKER and CHESTER
insurance support. An evaluation of to system-involved young adults risk of death from drug overdose of these intensive supervision programs more effectively. individuals recently released from is pending. prison was 129 times higher than the Policy and Practice Considerations general adult population.58 Notably, Juvenile justice systems have been To provide young adults with SUDs the risk of opioid-related death for experimenting with developmentally the full range of developmentally young adults after release from appropriate SUD treatment appropriate addiction treatment incarceration is significantly higher frameworks in ways not provided in modalities during justice system than it is for older adults.2 the adult systems.51 Multisystemic involvement, the expert panel urged Public safety outcomes after release Therapy–Emerging Adults, an policy makers to leverage the of incarcerated individuals with SUDs innovative adaptation of standard experience of the juvenile justice are equally poor. In 2018, technical multisystemic therapy for adolescents system. These include extending violations of parole and probation, to emerging adults with a serious juvenile justice measures to young such as failing drug tests, accounted mental illness and justice adults by raising the age of juvenile for nearly a quarter of state prison involvement, has been piloted with justice jurisdiction and adapting admissions of all ages.59 Three- promising outcomes in reducing both intervention models for younger quarters of both incarcerated young substance use and recidivism.52 youth to young adults. The justice adults and individuals imprisoned for system should also provide Some jurisdictions have launched a drug-related offense are arrested comprehensive access to initiatives for young adults that build for a new crime within 5 years of pharmacotherapy for addiction on the successes of mentoring release.7 A 2002 study of recidivism treatment during incarceration and interventions for children and in 15 states found that 22% of 18- to immediately after release. The expert adolescents.53 For example, the 24-year-olds released from panel highlighted the importance of Arches Transformative Mentoring incarceration returned to prison establishing quality metrics for young program (Arches) of New York City’s within 3 years for technical violations adult treatment programs during of parole, such as a failed drug test.60 Department of Probation, a group justice involvement and reentry A recent study on the effects of mentoring program serving young processes, and regularly monitoring imprisonment on future prison adult probation clients ages 16 to 24, the quality, frequency, availability, admission found that postprison is based on the idea that “credible duration, and outcomes of treatment. parole supervision increases the messengers,” people with Principle 3: The Justice System probability of imprisonment, backgrounds similar to those of their Should Provide Resources Dedicated primarily through the process of mentees, often including previous to Supporting the Safe Transition of technical violations and that criminal justice system involvement, Young Adults From a Period of substance use was included in 50% of are best positioned to engage the Incarceration Back to Their such technical violations.61 young adults who are hardest to Communities reach.54 In addition to mentoring, the Providing a continuum of care after curriculum of Arches include Guidance release and comprehensive evidence-based interventions, such as Overdose fatality rates among young prerelease planning for young adults, interactive journaling, that help adults are the highest of all age thus, hold promise to save lives and clients identify the link between their groups immediately after release increase public safety. Closer substance dependence and law- from incarceration. Public safety community-based partnerships breaking activities and enable them outcomes are also worst for young between providers and justice seek voluntary treatment.55,56 An adults with SUDs after release from agencies can increase the number of impact evaluation of Arches program incarceration. This highlights the services for those released from showed significant reductions in importance of developmentally incarceration and at high risk of recidivism rates of its participants.57 appropriate substance use treatment violating parole.61 The Parole services during the transition of Restoration Project (PRP) of the state Finally, some states (eg, MA, CT, MD) young adults from incarceration to of New York is one example of such have established specialized divisions their communities. successful community partnerships.62 within their departments of public Launched in 2001, the project’s aim health to focus specifically on young Evidence was to reduce length of stay for adult mental health and substance Drug overdose is the leading cause of persons detained on Rikers Island for abuse. Justice systems can use the death for formerly incarcerated technical parole violations with experience of such divisions by individuals.33 A study in the United a focus on people with SUD or mental working closely with them to respond States found, for example, that the illness. PRP works closely with the Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 147, number s2, January 2021 S253
NYC Department of Correction and that justice systems provide criminal justice system, such as arrest NYS Division of Parole to assess the comprehensive discharge planning, for a misdemeanor.70 An adult mental health and drug treatment including a continuum of health care, criminal record diminishes an needs of eligible individuals to create addiction treatment, access to health individual’s prospects of steady discharge plans and connect them insurance (Medicaid), education and employment and higher education, with community treatment providers. employment services, and stable restricts civic engagement, and limits In 2008, PRP reduced the average housing in close partnership with access to adequate housing and length of incarceration for high-need community-based providers. Justice public assistance.71 Since these individuals who violated parole by officials should turn to factors are critical to addiction 20%.62 developmentally appropriate, recovery, a healthy transition to community-based SUD treatment, adulthood, and desistence from Policy and Practice Considerations cognitive behavioral therapy, crime, denying young adults public Across the nation, the growth of education or employment programs benefits places them at a greater risk probation and parole, and its in cases of relapse in lieu of formal of relapse and recidivism. These unmatched funding, remain major probation/parole violation process effects also disproportionately affect obstacles to providing a continuum of and incarceration. youth of color, deepening care to young adults during their intergenerational poverty and racial transition from incarceration back to Principle 4: The Justice System inequities.72 their communities. Community-based Must Reduce the Harm Caused by Criminal Records That Create Hiring experiments show that partnerships with providers, such as a felony conviction reduces the Insurmountable Barriers to Young the PRP initiative discussed above, Adults’ Full and Healthy Community positive callback rate by nearly two- can connect young adults with SUDs Engagement and Their Sustained thirds for Black male applicants, and to treatment services in their Recovery From SUDs by half for white male applicants.73 communities after release. The cost of Such racially discriminatory effects Guidance these services could be paid for by on future job prospects is amplified the savings states would experience The effects of a criminal record on the life of a young adult are pervasive. A for young adults. Young men of color from reduced numbers of people that face higher levels of detachment from are reincarcerated as a result of a new criminal record creates barriers to housing, employment, and civic mainstream institutions compared sentence or violation of parole.63 with their white peers.22 In 2017, the engagement – each critical for Other major obstacles that interfere a justice-involved young adult’s percentage of Black males ages 18 to with the safe transition of young sustained recovery. The expert panel 19 that were out of school and adults with SUDs back to their praised efforts to reduce such unemployed was 31%, 2.5 times communities involve the significant collateral consequences by expunging higher than their white peers.74 Early stress and barriers to reentry faced criminal records, especially of drug- evidence suggests that the on release.64 These include stigma related offenses, and providing young coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic associated with being labeled an “ex- adults with protections and services will exacerbate these inequities.75 offender,” lack of health insurance, offered in juvenile/youth justice Of particular importance to young and diminished access to stable systems, such as confidentiality of adults with SUDs, researchers in housing, employment, and other proceedings and adjudication of a survey of college admissions support services.65,66 Among youth delinquency (guilty disposition in officials found that .90% viewed any released from jail or prison, only 30% juvenile system) rather than an adult felony conviction as particularly obtain employment or are in school criminal conviction. negative, and .75% felt the same within 12 months after release.67 way about any drug or alcohol SUDs can create a stubborn Evidence offense.76 Furthermore, young adults postrelease/relapse cycle, as they The American Bar Association has with adult criminal records may be adversely impact social viability and cataloged .45 000 civil restrictions subject to long periods of ineligibility reentry/entry attempts of formerly imposed by federal and state statutes for federal financial aid. For example, incarcerated youth to the workforce. and regulations as a result of adult applicants with 2 drug possession Failure to become established in their convictions.69 Despite being convictions or 1 drug sales conviction communities then increases young associated with convictions and can apply for federal funding only adults’ vulnerability to relapse.27,68 felony offenses, important collateral after 2 years from the date of the To ensure safe transition of young consequences on a person’s social most recent conviction.77 A National adults from incarceration back to and economic future can be triggered Poverty Center study found that their communities, it is paramount by even a simple interaction with the students of color were more likely to Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 S254 PERKER and CHESTER
need such federal grants, but also The juvenile justice system accords should leverage the experience of the more likely to be convicted of protective measures, such as juvenile justice systems to provide a disqualifying drug offense.72 confidentiality of proceedings and young adults under their care with a different disposition of court developmentally appropriate SUD Since 1987, US federal housing policy proceedings – an “adjudication of treatment modalities, including but has restricted people convicted for delinquency” rather than a conviction not limited to exploring the option of a felony, or any violent or drug- when a youth is found guilty of the raising the upper age of juvenile related crime, from receiving alleged offense – which provide some justice jurisdiction, adapting subsidized housing benefits.78 important legal protections. Some treatment programs for younger Furthermore, the 1996 “1 strike and states also provide a greater youth to young adults, and providing you’re out” policy provided a legal opportunity for juvenile records to be access to the full range of basis to evict all members of sealed or expunged than adult pharmacotherapy during a household of a person who is criminal records. incarceration and immediately after convicted of a drug-related crime.79 release. Community-based In the private market, similar barriers Policy makers should consider partnerships between providers and to adequate and safe housing exist for extending deferred adjudication and justice agencies and interagency those with a criminal record. expungement of criminal records to collaboration should be enhanced to According to a survey from 2005, young adults. It is essential that support the safe transition of young 80% of members of 1 major processes for expunging criminal adults from incarceration to their professional association for rental records are not made onerous. The communities. Finally, justice systems housing screen applicants for experience in many jurisdictions must remove barriers to housing, criminal records.80 By the same across the United States shows that employment, and other critical token, the Personal Responsibility tedious procedural requirements for supports and means of community and Work Opportunity Reconciliation expunging drug-related criminal engagement as a result of adult Act of 1996 imposes a lifetime ban on records marginalize emerging adults criminal records and provide young public assistance, such as the that often lack the resources, adults with legal protections offered Supplemental Nutrition Assistance knowledge, and confidence to in youth justice systems against such Program and Temporary Assistance navigate the legal system. Finally, collateral consequences. to Needy Families Program, for those current national policy discussions with felony convictions for the illegal for alleviating blanket, lifelong possession, use, or distribution of collateral consequences of adult ACKNOWLEDGMENTS drugs.81 A 2017 article found that conviction are encouraging for efforts We thank Vincent Schiraldi, Dr people convicted of a felony drug to ensure that young adults with Michael Silverstein, and Dr Ziming offense and with full access to public SUDs continue to have access to Xuan for comments on the article. welfare benefits are 10% less likely to services and resources that are Authors would also like to thank the return to prison within a year after essential to their sustained recovery. organizers and the participants of the release.82 Denial of benefits may, thus, 2018 Grayken Center for Addiction have the unintended consequence of Young Adult Summit for insightful increasing recidivism.83 CONCLUSIONS discussions. Recent reform efforts to tailor justice Policy and Practice Considerations responses to the needs of young Eliminating collateral consequences adults, especially of those with SUDs, ABBREVIATIONS of adult justice system involvement are welcome developments. Yet more MAT: medication-assisted for young adults with SUDs is an area progress needs to be made. It is treatment ripe for policy innovation. Raising the paramount that the justice system PAARI: Police Assisted Addiction upper age of juvenile jurisdiction systemically recognize young and Recovery Initiative comes to the forefront of such reform adulthood as a distinct developmental PRP: Parole Restoration Project initiatives. Including young adults in stage and opt for less punitive SUD: substance use disorder youth/juvenile justice systems holds measures that align with the promise to not only ensure their developments in the public health access to developmentally and medical fields. Young adults with appropriate, rehabilitative SUD SUDs should be diverted from formal REFERENCES treatment while incarcerated, but also justice systems to community-based 1. Schulenberg JE, Johnston LD, O’Malley to protect them from lifelong harmful SUD treatment whenever possible. PM, Bachman JG, Miech RA, Patrick ME. effects of an adult criminal record. Policy makers and practitioners Monitoring the Future national survey Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 147, number s2, January 2021 S255
results on drug use, 1975-2017. Volume 12. Bickel WK, Miller ML, Yi R, Kowal BP, 22. Schiraldi V, Western B, Bradner K. II, college students & adults ages 19-55. Lindquist DM, Pitcock JA. Behavioral Community-based responses to justice- 2018. Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/? and neuroeconomics of drug addiction: involved young adults. New Thinking in id=ED589764. Accessed July 1, 2020 competing neural systems and Community Corrections Bulletin. temporal discounting processes. Drug Washington, DC: US Department of 2. Siringil Perker S, Chester LEH. Alcohol Depend. 2007;90(suppl 1): Justice, National Institute of Justice; Combating the Crisis: Using Justice S85–S91 2015. NCJ 248900. Reform to Address the Drug Epidemic among Emerging Adults. New York, NY: 13. Gardner M, Steinberg L. Peer influence 23. Siringil Perker S, Chester LEH, Schiraldi Justice Lab at Columbia University; on risk taking, risk preference, and VN. Emerging Adult Justice in Illinois: 2018. Available at: https://justicelab. risky decision making in adolescence Towards an Age-Appropriate Approach. columbia.edu/sites/default/files/ and adulthood: an experimental study. New York, NY: Justice Lab at Columbia content/CombatingTheCrisis.pdf Dev Psychol. 2005;41(4):625–635 University; 2019. Available at: https:// doi.org/10.7916/d8-fpvw-1t32 3. US Department of Justice, Federal 14. Squeglia LM, Tapert SF, Sullivan EV, et al. Bureau of Investigation. Crime in the Brain development in heavy-drinking 24. Bobo LD, Thompson V. Unfair by design: United States, 2015. Available at: adolescents. Am J Psychiatry. 2015; the war on drugs, race, and the https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/ 172(6):531–542 legitimacy of the criminal justice 2015/crime-in-the-u.s.-2015/tables/ system. Soc Res (New York). 2006;73(2): table-38. Accessed June 12, 2020 15. Dahlgren MK, Sagar KA, Racine MT, 445–472 Dreman MW, Gruber SA. Marijuana use 4. US Department of Justice, Office of predicts cognitive performance on 25. United States Department of Justice, Justice Programs. National corrections tasks of executive function. J Stud Federal Bureau of Investigation. Crime reporting program, 1991–2015: Alcohol Drugs. 2016;77(2):298–308 in the United States, 2017. Available at: selected variables. 2018. Available at: https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/ https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR36862.v1. 16. Gruber SA, Dahlgren MK, Sagar KA, 2017/crime-in-the-u.s.-2017/topic-pages/ Accessed July 1, 2020 Gönenç A, Lukas SE. Worth the wait: tables/table-38. Accessed July 1, 2020 effects of age of onset of marijuana use 5. Bronson J, Carson EA. Prisoners in 26. Bureau of Justice Statistics. Arrest data on white matter and impulsivity. 2017. Washington, DC: US Department of analysis tool: annual tables. 2014. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2014; Justice; 2019 Available at: https://www.bjs.gov/index. 231(8):1455–1465 cfm?ty=datool&surl=/arrests/index. 6. Sawyer W, Wagner P. Mass 17. Morgan RE, Truman JL. Criminal cfm#. Accessed July 1, 2020 incarceration: the whole pie 2019. Victimization, 2017. Washington DC: US Available at: https://www.prisonpolicy. 27. Chandler RK, Fletcher BW, Volkow ND. Department of Justice; 2018. Available org/reports/pie2019.html. Accessed Treating drug abuse and addiction in at: https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ July 1, 2020 the criminal justice system: improving pdf/cv17.pdf public health and safety. JAMA. 2009; 7. Durose MR, Cooper AD, Snyder HN. 18. Velazquez T. Young adult justice: a new 301(2):183–190 Recidivism of prisoners released in 30 frontier worth exploring. 2013. states in 2005: patterns from 2005 to 28. Mulvey EP, Schubert CA, Chassin L. Available at: http:// Substance Use and Delinquent Behavior 2010. 2014 chronicleofsocialchange.org/wp- among Serious Adolescent Offenders. 8. Hardin AP, Hackell JM; Committee on content/uploads/2013/05/Young-Adult- Washington, DC: US Department of Practice and Ambulatory Medicine. Age Justice-FINAL-revised.pdf. Accessed July Justice; 2010 limit of pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2017; 1, 2020 140(3):e20172151 29. Behind Bars II: Substance Abuse and 19. Sampson RJ, Laub JH. Crime in the America’s Prison Population. National 9. Steinberg L, Icenogle G. Using making: pathways and turning points Center on Addiction and Substance Developmental Science to Distinguish through life. Crime Delinq. 1993;39(3): Abuse at Columbia University; 2010. Adolescents and Adults under the Law. 396 Available at: https://eric.ed.gov/?id= In: SSRN, vol. 1. 2019:21–40 ED509000. Accessed July 13, 2020 20. Mulvey EP. Highlights from Pathways to 10. Monahan KC, Steinberg L, Cauffman E, Desistance: A Longitudinal Study of 30. Clark N, Dolan K, Farabee D. Public Mulvey EP. Trajectories of antisocial Serious Adolescent Offenders. health alternatives to incarceration for behavior and psychosocial maturity Washington, DC: US Department of drug offenders. East Mediterr Health J. from adolescence to young adulthood. Justice; 2011 2017;23(3):222–230 Dev Psychol. 2009;45(6):1654–1668 21. Laub JH, Sampson RJ. Life-course and 31. Jones N. How things fall apart: race and 11. Bryan-Hancock C, Casey S. developmental criminology: looking suspicion in police-civilian encounters. Psychological maturity of at-risk back, moving forward - ASC division of Clarke Forum for Contemporary Issues: juveniles, young adults and adults: developmental and life-course Public Lectures. 2015. Available at: implications for the justice system. criminology inaugural David P. https://scholar.dickinson.edu/ Psychiatry Psychol Law. 2010;17(1): Farrington lecture, 2017. J Dev Life clarkeforum_lectures/30. Accessed July 57–69 Course Criminology. 2020;6(2):158–171 1, 2020 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 S256 PERKER and CHESTER
32. American Civil Liberties Union. Written 42. Hadland SE, Wharam JF, Schuster MA, substance use treatment services submission of the American Civil Zhang F, Samet JH, Larochelle MR. needs among adolescent offenders. Liberties Union on racial disparities in Trends in receipt of buprenorphine and J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017;74:80–91 sentencing. 2014. Available at: https:// naltrexone for opioid use disorder 52. Sheidow AJ, McCart MR, Davis M. www.aclu.org/sites/default/files/asse among adolescents and young adults, Multisystemic therapy for emerging ts/141027_iachr_racial_disparities_a 2001-2014. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(8): adults with serious mental illness and clu_submission_0.pdf. Accessed July 1, 747–755 justice involvement. Cognit Behav Pract. 2020 2016;23(3):356–367 43. Zarkin GA, Cowell AJ, Hicks KA, et al. 33. Merrall ELC, Kariminia A, Binswanger IA, Lifetime benefits and costs of diverting 53. DuBois DL, Portillo N, Rhodes JE, et al. Meta-analysis of drug-related substance-abusing offenders from state Silverthorn N, Valentine JC. How deaths soon after release from prison. prison. Crime Delinq. 2015;61(6): effective are mentoring programs for Addiction. 2010;105(9):1545–1554 829–850 youth? A systematic assessment of the 34. Coffey C, Wolfe R, Lovett AW, Moran P, 44. Massachusetts Department of Public evidence. Psychol Sci Public Interest. Cini E, Patton GC. Predicting death in Health. An assessment of opioid-related 2011;12(2):57–91 young offenders: a retrospective cohort deaths in Massachusetts, 2013–2014. 54. City of New York Department of study. Med J Aust. 2004;181(9):473–477 2016 Probation. Arches: a transformative 35. Jacobson MP, Schiraldi V, Daly R, Hotez 45. Vestal C. At Rikers Island, a legacy of mentoring intervention. 2012. Available E. Less is more: how reducing probation medication-assisted opioid treatment. at: www.nyc.gov/html/prob/downloads/ populations can improve outcomes. Stateline. May 23, 2016. Available at: pdf/arches_rfa_01192012_3.pdf. 2017. Available at: www.hks.harvard. http://pew.org/27ISkFh. Accessed July Accessed July 1, 2020 edu/sites/default/files/centers/wiener/ 13, 2020 55. Proctor S, Corwin C, Hoffmann N, Allison programs/pcj/files/less_is_more_final. S. A tool to engage jail inmates. 2009. 46. Green TC, Clarke J, Brinkley-Rubinstein pdf. Accessed July 1, 2020 Available at: https://psychcongress. L, et al. Postincarceration fatal 36. Corbett RP. The burdens of leniency: the overdoses after implementing com/article/tool-engage-jail-inmates. changing face of probation. Minnesota medications for addiction treatment in Accessed July 13, 2020 Law Review. 2015:360026-5535 a statewide correctional system. JAMA 56. Proctor SL, Hoffmann NG, Allison S. The Psychiatry. 2018;75(4):405–407 effectiveness of interactive journaling 37. Cuddy J, Smith D, Linder L. Young Adults and Community Supervision: The Need 47. National Institutes of Health. Justice in reducing recidivism among for a Developmentally Appropriate Community Opioid Innovation Network. substance-dependent jail inmates. Int Approach to Probation. Austin, TX: Texas 2019. Available at: https://heal.nih.gov/ J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2012; Criminal Justice Coalition; 2018. research/research-to-practice/jcoin. 56(2):317–332 Available at: https://www.texascjc.org/ Accessed July 1, 2020 57. Lynch M, Astone NM, Collazos J, Lipman system/files/publications/Young%20Adu M, Esthappan S. Arches transformative 48. Loeber R, Farrington DP, Petechuk D. lts%20and%20Community%20Supervi mentoring program. 2018. Available at: Bulletin 1: from Juvenile Delinquency to sion%20Report.pdf https://www.urban.org/research/ Young Adult Offending (Study Group on 38. Police Executive Research Forum. Ten the Transitions between Juvenile publication/arches-transformative- standards of care: policing and the Delinquency and Adult Crime). 2013. mentoring-program. Accessed July 13, opioid crisis. 2018. Available at: http://a Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/ 2020 mericanhealth.jhu.edu/sites/default/file pdffiles1/nij/grants/242931.pdf. 58. Binswanger IA, Stern MF, Deyo RA, et al. s/inline-files/PolicingOpioidCrisis_ Accessed July 1, 2020 Release from prison–a high risk of LONG_final_0.pdf. Accessed July 1, 2020 death for former inmates. N Engl J Med. 49. Matthews S, Schiraldi V, Chester L. 39. Lead National Support Bureau. What is Youth justice in Europe: experience of 2007;356(2):157–165 LEAD? 2020. Available at: https://www. Germany, the Netherlands, and Croatia 59. Council of State Governments Justice leadbureau.org/about-lead. Accessed in providing developmentally Center. Confined and costly: how July 1, 2020 appropriate responses to emerging supervision violations are filling adults in the criminal justice system. prisons and burdening budgets. 2019. 40. The Police Assisted Addiction and Justice Eval J. 2018;59–81 Available at: https://csgjusticecenter. Recovery Initiative. Annual report June 2015 - June 2016. 2016. Available at: 50. Spencer S. Hope and consequences: org/publications/confined-costly/. https://paariusa.org/about-us/annual- “Drug court” launched in Uxbridge. Accessed July 13, 2020 report/. Accessed July 1, 2020 2016. Available at: https:// 60. Langan P, Levin D. Recidivism of worcestercountysheriff.com/2016/05/ Prisoners Released in 1994. Washington 41. Bagley SM, Larochelle MR, Xuan Z, et al. 02/4014/. Accessed July 1, 2020 DC: US Department of Justice; 2002. Characteristics and receipt of medication treatment among young 51. Belenko S, Knight D, Wasserman GA, Available at: https://www.bjs.gov/index. adults who experience a nonfatal et al. The Juvenile Justice Behavioral cfm?ty=pbdetail&iid=1134 opioid-related overdose. Ann Emerg Health Services Cascade: a new 61. Harding DJ, Morenoff JD, Nguyen AP, Med. 2020;75(1):9–38 framework for measuring unmet Bushway SD. Short- and long-term Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 PEDIATRICS Volume 147, number s2, January 2021 S257
effects of imprisonment on future 68. Shivy VA, Wu JJ, Moon AE, Mann SC, https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat03.pdf. felony convictions and prison Holland JG, Eacho C. Ex-offenders Accessed July 1, 2020 admissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. reentering the workforce. J Couns 75. Lewis K. A decade undone: youth 2017;114(42):11103–11108 Psychol. 2007;54(4):466–473 disconnection in the age of 62. Center for Alternative Sentencing and 69. American Bar Association. Collateral coronavirus. 2020. Available at: http:// Employment Services. Parole consequences of conviction project. measureofamerica.org/youth- restoration project: a community 2020. Available at: https://www. disconnection-2020/. Accessed July 13, linkage program for technical parole americanbar.org/groups/criminal_ 2020 violators with special needs. Available justice/niccc/. Accessed July 1, 2020 76. Center for Community Alternatives. The at: https://www.cases.org/resources/ 70. Uggen C, Vuolo M, Lageson S, Ruhland E, use of criminal history in college communications/brochures/prp.pdf. Whitham HK. The edge of stigma: an admissions: reconsidered. 2010. Accessed July 1, 2020 experimental audit of the effects of low- Available at: www. 63. Schiraldi VN, Arzu JL. Less Is More in level criminal records on employment: communityalternatives.org/pdf/ New York: An Examination of the Impact arrest and employment. Criminology. Reconsidered-criminal-hist-recs-in- of State Parole Violations on Prison and 2014;52(4):627–654 college-admissions.pdf. Accessed July 1, Jail Populations. New York, NY: Justice 71. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. 2020 Lab at Columbia University; 2018 Collateral consequences: the 77. Student eligibility, 20 USC x1091(r) 64. Western B. Homeward: Life in the Year Crossroads of punishment, redemption, (2019). after Prison. New York: Russell Sage and the effects on communities.; 2019. Available at: https://www.usccr.gov/ 78. Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1988, 42 USC x Foundation; 2018 1437(d)(I)(4)(A)(Ii) (2019). pubs/2019/06-13-Collateral- 65. Center for Substance Abuse Treatment. Consequences.pdf. Accessed July 1, 79. Housing Opportunity Program Continuity of Offender Treatment for 2020 Extension Act of 1996, 42 USC x Substance Use Disorders from 1437(d)(I)(6) (2019). 72. Wheelock D, Uggen C. Race, Poverty and Institution to Community Treatment Punishment: The Impact of Criminal 80. Thacher D. The rise of criminal Improvement Protocol (TIP) Series 30. Sanctions on Racial, Ethnic, and background screening in rental Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Socioeconomic Inequality: Why Racial housing. Law Soc Inq. 2008;33(1):5–30 Mental Health Services Administration; and Ethnic Disparities Persist. In: Lin AC, 2004 81. Personal Responsibility and Work Harris DR, eds. The Colors of Poverty: 66. Knight K, Farabee D, eds.. Treating Why Racial and Ethnic Disparities Opportunity Reconciliation Act of 1996, Addicted Offenders: A Continuum of Persist. New York, NY: Russell Sage; Pub L No 104–193, 110 Vol Stat (2105). Effective Practices. Kingston, NJ: Civic 2008:261–292 82. Yang CS. Does public assistance reduce Research Institute; 2004 73. Pager D. The mark of a criminal record. recidivism? Am Econ Rev. 2017;107(5): 67. Abrams LS, Franke TM. Postsecondary Am J Sociol. 2003;108(5):937–975 551–555 educational engagement among 74. United States Bureau of Labor 83. Uggen C, Stewart R. Piling on: collateral formerly-incarcerated transition-age Statistics. Labor force statistics from consequences and community young men. J Offender Rehabil. 2013; the current population survey. Annual supervision. Minnesota Law Review. 52(4):233–253 averages table 3. 2017. Available at: 2015;99(5):1871–1912 Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021 S258 PERKER and CHESTER
The Justice System and Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders Selen Siringil Perker and Lael E. H. Chester Pediatrics 2021;147;S249 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-023523H Updated Information & including high resolution figures, can be found at: Services http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/147/Supplement_2/S249 References This article cites 33 articles, 2 of which you can access for free at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/147/Supplement_2/S249 #BIBL Permissions & Licensing Information about reproducing this article in parts (figures, tables) or in its entirety can be found online at: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/Permissions.xhtml Reprints Information about ordering reprints can be found online: http://www.aappublications.org/site/misc/reprints.xhtml Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021
The Justice System and Young Adults With Substance Use Disorders Selen Siringil Perker and Lael E. H. Chester Pediatrics 2021;147;S249 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2020-023523H The online version of this article, along with updated information and services, is located on the World Wide Web at: http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/147/Supplement_2/S249 Pediatrics is the official journal of the American Academy of Pediatrics. A monthly publication, it has been published continuously since 1948. Pediatrics is owned, published, and trademarked by the American Academy of Pediatrics, 345 Park Avenue, Itasca, Illinois, 60143. Copyright © 2021 by the American Academy of Pediatrics. All rights reserved. Print ISSN: 1073-0397. Downloaded from www.aappublications.org/news by guest on October 19, 2021
You can also read