The Forrester Wave: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020

Page created by Kelly Owen
 
CONTINUE READING
Licensed for individual use only

The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms,
Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

by Cheryl McKinnon
June 16, 2020

Why Read This Report                                                                   Key Takeaways
In our 26-criterion evaluation of intranet                                             Igloo Software, LumApps, And Simpplr Lead
platform providers, we identified the 12 most                                          The Pack
significant ones — Akumina, Atlassian, Aurea                                           Forrester’s research uncovered a market in
(Jive Software), Igloo Software, Interact, Liferay,                                    which Igloo Software, LumApps, and Simpplr
LiveTiles, LumApps, Microsoft, SDL, Simpplr, and                                       are Leaders; Akumina, Liferay, LiveTiles,
Unily — and researched, analyzed, and scored                                           Microsoft, Unily, and Interact are Strong
them. This report shows how each provider                                              Performers; and Atlassian, SDL, and Aurea (Jive
measures up and helps application development                                          Software) are Contenders.
and delivery (AD&D) professionals select the right
                                                                                       Personalized Communications, Design Tools,
one for their needs.
                                                                                       And Dashboards Are Key Differentiators
                                                                                       Aging on-premises intranets are dying.
                                                                                       Cloud platforms with flexible content and
                                                                                       communication creation and delivery options
                                                                                       will lead the pack. Vendors that provide granular
                                                                                       personalization, design and templating tools,
                                                                                       and integration with top productivity suites are
                                                                                       revitalizing this market.

This PDF is only licensed for individual use when downloaded from forrester.com or reprints.forrester.com. All other distribution prohibited.
forrester.com
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals

The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

             by Cheryl McKinnon
             with Daniel Hong, Sara Sjoblom, Peter Harrison, and Madison Bakalar
             June 16, 2020

Table Of Contents                                                          Related Research Documents
 2 Personalized Experiences And Cloud                                      The Employee Experience Maturity Assessment
   Delivery Drive Intranet Renewals
                                                                           Now Tech: Intranet Platforms, Q1 2020
 3 Evaluation Summary
                                                                           Your Intranet Is Dead: Reboot Communication
 8 Vendor Offerings                                                        And Collaboration With Employees At The Center

 9 Vendor Profiles

   Leaders

   Strong Performers                                                                                 Share reports with colleagues.
                                                                                                     Enhance your membership with
   Contenders
                                                                                                     Research Share.
15 Evaluation Overview

   Vendor Inclusion Criteria

16 Supplemental Material

                     Forrester Research, Inc., 60 Acorn Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA
                     +1 617-613-6000 | Fax: +1 617-613-5000 | forrester.com
                     © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Opinions reflect judgment at the time and are subject to change. Forrester®,
                     Technographics®, Forrester Wave, TechRadar, and Total Economic Impact are trademarks of Forrester Research,
                     Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective companies. Unauthorized copying or distributing
                     is a violation of copyright law. Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

Personalized Experiences And Cloud Delivery Drive Intranet Renewals
Intranets remain the least loved of the typical applications provided to employees. The 66% of global
information workers who are satisfied with their intranet pales in comparison with the more than
80% who are happy with their calendaring, word processing, spreadsheet, and email tools.1 Aging
on-premises and homegrown systems are poorly equipped to serve mobile or remote workforces.
These systems are not nimble enough to handle shifting business models, frequent organizational
changes, or the unanticipated work-from-home imperative driven by the pandemic. This must change.
Organizations that value their employee experience understand that technology choices matter.

Forrester’s Employee Experience (EX) Index reveals a relationship between technology satisfaction
and employee engagement. Employees who are the most engaged in their workplace are also highly
satisfied with their collaboration tools and their ability to access the information they need to do their
jobs.2 Today’s demands include timely delivery of relevant content via users’ preferred consumption
channels — web, mobile, or expressed in the context of other essential enterprise applications.

No longer can content be bottlenecked by inefficient processes dependent on developers or
webmasters to format and publish.3 Newer processes focus on subject matter and communication
experts as primary content creators. Architectures are shifting to cloud, and integration with today’s top
productivity suites and enterprise applications are essential.

As a result of these trends, intranet platform customers should look for providers that can:

 ›› Personalize the communication and content delivery experience. Personalization capabilities
    must be two-sided. Content creators need to tailor information to precise audiences, but employees
    should also be able to set their own preferences. Content and communication creators want to
    define groups and personas that go beyond standard directory services groups. For example, a
    group of retail store managers in a region will pay attention to local and specific information and
    not send scattershot email blasts to all management job types. Employees want to subscribe to
    announcements relevant to their role, region, or skill level and set language and device preferences.

 ›› Provide flexible design and user interface tools. Branding, design, color schemes, accessibility,
    and templating tools are often used by designers. Aging systems are bottlenecked when only a
    core group of intranet admins or webmasters can modify pages or sites. This approach fails to
    scale in global, multibrand, multilanguage sites with frequently updated content. Templates for
    sites, content types, or widgets that can be deployed multiple times help keep intranets relevant
    and responsive to changing needs. Enterprises serving deskless workers should also look for
    intranet mobile apps that can be custom branded.4

 ›› Integrate to essential productivity suites and enterprise applications. AD&D pros must
    determine the critical integration points between the intranet and other technology investments.
    Decide if the intranet platform should operate independently or if it must integrate to existing
    content management repositories, search, or collaboration tools. Essential data, such as employee

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.              2
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

    information in human resource applications or network directory services, is often required for user
    and group management. Support for preferred identity management and single sign-on tools for
    cloud and mobile access is also important.

Evaluation Summary
The Forrester Wave™ evaluation highlights Leaders, Strong Performers, Contenders, and Challengers.
It’s an assessment of the top vendors in the market and does not represent the entire vendor
landscape. You’ll find more information about this broader market in our Now Tech: Intranet Platforms,
Q1 2020 report.

We intend this evaluation to be a starting point only and encourage clients to view product evaluations
and adapt criteria weightings using the Excel-based vendor comparison tool (see Figure 1 and see
Figure 2). Click the link at the beginning of this report on Forrester.com to download the tool.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.              3
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                                 June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 1 Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020

    Intranet Platforms
    Q2 2020

                                                                            Strong
              Challengers              Contenders                       Performers                                             Leaders

         Stronger
          current
          offering

                                                                                                               Simpplr

                                                                                           Liferay                 LumApps

                                                                               LiveTiles                Igloo Software

                                                                                       Unily

                                                                                         Interact                Akumina
                                                             SDL                                                 Microsoft

                                                             Aurea
                                                                                        Atlassian

          Weaker
          current
          offering

                     Weaker strategy                                                                                   Stronger strategy

                                                                      Market presence

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.                     4
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                                        June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms Scorecard, Q2 2020

                                                                                                            e
                                                                                                          ar
                                                                                                       ftw
                                                        gh r’s
                                                              g

                                                                                                                                          ps
                                                              n
                                                             a

                                                                                                                                    s
                                                           tin

                                                                                                     So
                                                   ei te

                                                           ia

                                                                                                               ct

                                                                                                                                 ile
                                                          in

                                                                                                                                        Ap
                                                                                                                         y
                                                  w res

                                                        ss

                                                         a
                                                      um

                                                                                                             ra

                                                                                                                     ra

                                                                                                                                eT
                                                                                                  o
                                                      re

                                                                                                                                       m
                                                     la

                                                                                                          te
                                                                                                lo

                                                                                                                     fe
                                                      r

                                                                                                                                v
                                                  Au
                                                  Ak
                                                  Fo

                                                                                                                                     Lu
                                                  At

                                                                                               Ig

                                                                                                        In

                                                                                                                  Li

                                                                                                                             Li
      Current offering                               50%         3.22      2.14     2.25      3.56      2.92      3.28     3.56      3.38
      Repository and content services                  3%        1.00      3.00     3.00      3.00      3.00      5.00     3.00      3.00
      Metadata support                                 5%        1.00      1.00     3.00      3.00      3.00      5.00     3.00      3.00
      Search and indexing                              5%        1.00      3.00     1.00      3.00      3.00      5.00     5.00      3.00
      Dashboards and reporting                         6%        3.00      1.00     3.00      3.00      1.00      3.00     5.00      3.00
      Delegated administration                         6%        3.00      5.00     1.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
      Governance services                              5%        3.00      1.00     3.00      5.00      5.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
      Collaborative content services                   5%        1.00      5.00     5.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
      Internal communications                          7%        3.00      1.00     3.00      5.00      5.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
      Information architecture                         7%        3.00      1.00     1.00      3.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
      Knowledge graphs                                 7%        3.00      3.00     1.00      1.00      3.00      1.00     3.00      3.00
      Content analytics                                5%        3.00      3.00     1.00      3.00      1.00      1.00     3.00      1.00
      AI and/or machine learning                       5%        3.00      1.00     0.00      1.00      1.00      5.00     3.00      1.00
      Design tools                                     7%        5.00      1.00     3.00      3.00      3.00      3.00     5.00      5.00
      User interfaces                                  5%        5.00      1.00     3.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
      Templating                                       7%        5.00      3.00     1.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     5.00      5.00
      Integration and interoperability                 3%        5.00      3.00     1.00      3.00      3.00      5.00     5.00      3.00
      Developer support                                5%        3.00      3.00     5.00      5.00      3.00      5.00     3.00      1.00
      Personalization                                  7%        5.00      1.00     3.00      3.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00

      All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).

                        © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.                          5
                        Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                                         June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms Scorecard, Q2 2020 (Cont.)

                                                                                                             e
                                                                                                           ar
                                                                                                        ftw
                                                         gh r’s
                                                               g

                                                                                                                                           ps
                                                               n
                                                              a

                                                                                                                                     s
                                                            tin

                                                                                                      So
                                                    ei te

                                                            ia

                                                                                                                ct

                                                                                                                                  ile
                                                           in

                                                                                                                                         Ap
                                                                                                                          y
                                                   w res

                                                         ss

                                                          a
                                                       um

                                                                                                              ra

                                                                                                                      ra

                                                                                                                                 eT
                                                                                                   o
                                                       re

                                                                                                                                        m
                                                      la

                                                                                                           te
                                                                                                 lo

                                                                                                                      fe
                                                       r

                                                                                                                                 v
                                                   Au
                                                   Ak
                                                   Fo

                                                                                                                                      Lu
                                                   At

                                                                                                Ig

                                                                                                         In

                                                                                                                   Li

                                                                                                                              Li
       Strategy                                       50%         3.70      2.60     1.60      4.30      2.70      3.30     3.00      4.40
       Market approach                                20%         3.00      3.00     1.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
       Product vision                                 20%         3.00      3.00     1.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
       Execution roadmap                              20%         5.00      1.00     1.00      3.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
       Partner ecosystem                              15%         5.00      3.00     1.00      3.00      1.00      5.00     3.00      3.00
       Supporting products and services               15%         3.00      3.00     5.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
       Delivery model                                 10%         3.00      3.00     1.00      5.00      3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00

       Market presence                                  0%        1.00      5.00     3.00      2.00      2.50      1.50     3.00      1.50
       Customer base                                  50%         1.00      5.00     2.00      2.00      3.00      1.00     3.00      1.00
       Product revenue                                50%         1.00      5.00     4.00      2.00      2.00      2.00     3.00      2.00

      All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).

                         © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.                          6
                         Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                             June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms Scorecard, Q2 2020 (Cont.)

                                                        gh r’s
                                                              g

                                                              ft
                                                           tin
                                                    ei te

                                                           so

                                                                                            lr
                                                                                          pp
                                                   w res

                                                        ro

                                                                                                    ly
                                                       L

                                                                                        m
                                                     ic

                                                                                                 ni
                                                      r

                                                   SD
                                                   Fo

                                                   M

                                                                                      Si

                                                                                                U
       Current offering                               50%         2.72      2.74     4.12      3.18
       Repository and content services                  3%        5.00      5.00     5.00      3.00
       Metadata support                                 5%        3.00      3.00     5.00      5.00
       Search and indexing                              5%        3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
       Dashboards and reporting                         6%        1.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Delegated administration                         6%        1.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Governance services                              5%        1.00      3.00     5.00      3.00
       Collaborative content services                   5%        5.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
       Internal communications                          7%        3.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Information architecture                         7%        3.00      5.00     5.00      3.00
       Knowledge graphs                                 7%        5.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Content analytics                                5%        3.00      5.00     3.00      3.00
       AI and/or machine learning                       5%        3.00      5.00     3.00      3.00
       Design tools                                     7%        3.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
       User interfaces                                  5%        1.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Templating                                       7%        3.00      1.00     3.00      3.00
       Integration and interoperability                 3%        3.00      3.00     5.00      1.00
       Developer support                                5%        3.00      5.00     1.00      3.00
       Personalization                                  7%        1.00      3.00     5.00      5.00

      All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).

                         © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.              7
                         Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                             June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 2 Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms Scorecard, Q2 2020 (Cont.)

                                                        gh r’s
                                                              g

                                                              ft
                                                           tin
                                                    ei te

                                                           so

                                                                                            lr
                                                                                          pp
                                                   w res

                                                        ro

                                                                                                    ly
                                                       L

                                                                                        m
                                                     ic

                                                                                                 ni
                                                      r

                                                   SD
                                                   Fo

                                                   M

                                                                                      Si

                                                                                                U
       Strategy                                       50%         3.60      2.00     3.60      3.10
       Market approach                                20%         3.00      1.00     3.00      3.00
       Product vision                                 20%         3.00      1.00     5.00      3.00
       Execution roadmap                              20%         3.00      3.00     3.00      5.00
       Partner ecosystem                              15%         5.00      3.00     3.00      1.00
       Supporting products and services               15%         5.00      3.00     3.00      3.00
       Delivery model                                 10%         3.00      1.00     5.00      3.00

       Market presence                                  0%        5.00      1.00     1.00      1.50
       Customer base                                  50%         5.00      1.00     1.00      1.00
       Product revenue                                50%         5.00      1.00     1.00      2.00

      All scores are based on a scale of 0 (weak) to 5 (strong).

Vendor Offerings
Forrester included 12 vendors in this assessment: Akumina, Atlassian, Aurea, Igloo Software, Interact,
Liferay, LiveTiles, LumApps, Microsoft, SDL, Simpplr, and Unily (see Figure 3).

                         © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.              8
                         Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                                 June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

FIGURE 3 Evaluated Vendors And Product Information

      Vendor               Product evaluated                                                              Product version evaluated

      Akumina              Akumina Employee Experience Software Platform                                                       4.8

      Atlassian            Atlassian Confluence Cloud                                                                      N/A

      Aurea                Jive Interactive Intranet                                                                      9.2.0

      Igloo Software       Igloo Digital Workplace Platform                                                                N/A

      Interact             Interact                                                                                        N/A

      Liferay              Liferay Digital Experience Platform                                                                 7.2

      LiveTiles            LiveTiles Wizdom Intelligent Intranet                                                           6.41

      LumApps              LumApps                                                                                         N/A

      Microsoft            Microsoft 365                                                                                   N/A

      SDL                  SDL Tridion                                                                                     N/A

      Simpplr              Simpplr Connect Platform                                                                  Winter 2020

      Unily                Unily                                                                                           N/A

Vendor Profiles
Our analysis uncovered the following strengths and weaknesses of individual vendors.

Leaders

 ›› Igloo leads with communication and collaboration and shines during crisis response. Igloo
    Software is one of the more mature cloud-native platforms, offering solid intranet capabilities as
    well as packaged applications for targeted use cases. It invests in scalability and serves the needs
    of multibrand/site firms with its networked enterprise architecture. Specific apps for new employee
    onboarding, town halls, or knowledge management augment its core platform. Igloo Software
    must increase its pace of innovation as newer players enter the market and accelerate its mobility,
    AI/machine learning (ML), and user interface investments. Watch for simplified pricing/licensing
    models, better Microsoft Teams integration, and publishing enhancements.

    Igloo Software’s breadth of overall collaboration capabilities, as well as its robust content
    governance and delegated administration models are key strengths. Weaknesses include maturity
    of its AI/ML and knowledge graph capabilities, which lag some newer market entrants. Reference

                       © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.                    9
                       Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

    customers gave high marks for content authoring, editing experience, and its professional services.
    They also attest to its value as a trusted hub during disrupted operations during a crisis. Areas
    for improvement include the platform’s personalization capabilities and search. Evaluate Igloo
    Software when robust intranet and communications capabilities are needed with added flexibility to
    adopt it either horizontally or for very targeted use cases.

 ›› LumApps leads with superior employee communication and site design tools. LumApps has
    served very large enterprises since its founding and has capabilities to enhance both the Google
    and Microsoft ecosystems. As a hub for employee communications, collaboration, and knowledge,
    the vendor delivers ongoing innovation with a frequent release cycle. Customers on this cloud-
    native software-as-a-service (SaaS) platform are never at risk of falling behind on old versions,
    unlike vendors with on-premises models. LumApps has strategic partnerships with both Google
    and Microsoft, but delivering intranet and employee communications capabilities to extend both
    ecosystems equally well will continue to be a challenge. Expect ongoing investment in AI and
    cross-application analytics to surface insights and serve knowledge management use cases,
    deepen their user persona capabilities, and extend their partner marketplace.

    LumApps has strong design tools as well as a breadth of internal communications options, with
    rich user profiles as an area of differentiation. Pages and widgets are the core of content delivery
    and provide a strong background information architecture. Weaknesses include APIs that are
    narrower than most other vendors, and developer communities are still works-in-progress. AI/
    ML and content analytics are also immature. Reference customers are consistent in praise for
    content authoring capabilities and overall design experience but are less satisfied with search
    and reporting. Evaluate LumApps when a scalable SaaS platform that focuses on employee
    communications and works with major productivity suites is important.

 ›› Simpplr leads with personalization for communication and content delivery. Simpplr is a
    pure-play, cloud-native intranet and communication platform, with traction in digitally savvy large
    enterprises and tech companies. Simpplr’s strategy is to deepen its analytics and engagement
    offerings, on top of a solid content and communication platform. Product vision is grounded
    in a superior user experience and a roadmap driven by data and customer insights. As a SaaS
    offering, Simpplr may constrain customers from extensive customizations, and APIs are an area
    of investment. Watch for ongoing investments into its developer communities, in more packaged
    services offerings, and in its analytics.

    Simpplr’s strengths include strong repository, governance, and internal communication capabilities,
    as well as broad personalization options. However, its APIs and developer resources are relatively
    immature compared with other Leaders in this evaluation, and its AI services require upfront training
    by its professional services team. Reference customers rate internal communications tools very highly,
    even for essential crisis communication. Professional services capabilities were also well-received,
    though integration with some third-party tools was noted as a gap. Shortlist Simpplr when a cloud-
    native, scalable platform focused on employee communications and content delivery is needed.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             10
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

Strong Performers

 ›› Akumina excels in design tools but is dependent on third-party content services. Akumina
    focuses on a broad set of digital employee experience use cases, differentiating with its “Total
    Visual Control” design capabilities. Akumina is clear in its focus on extending the intranet
    experience across the Microsoft 365 ecosystem and has one of the most flexible licensing models
    in the market — focusing on not just users but also instances of the platform, encouraging its
    use for multiple purposes. Akumina’s dependence on third-party content repository services is
    by design, but this strategy limits it in a number of intranet modernization opportunities. Expect
    deeper integration into the Microsoft ecosystem (such as incorporating knowledge graphs and
    employee-facing bots) and continued integration with popular enterprise applications, such as
    aggregating feeds and activities for roadmap items.

    Strengths include design and templating capabilities, as well as a broad set of predefined
    application integration widgets for common enterprise applications. Persona creation tools enable
    targeted communications. Akumina’s dependence on Microsoft 365 results in relatively weak native
    collaboration and repository capabilities. Reference customers attest to the power of Akumina’s
    design tools, ease of content creation/editing, and ability to personalize communication. They
    express some dissatisfaction with performance, upgrades, and reporting. Akumina is a good fit for
    firms that are focused on employee communications, desire strong brand/design control, and have
    adopted the Microsoft ecosystem.

 ›› Liferay is a mature platform but misses a knowledge graph for smart content delivery. Well-
    known as a platform for websites and portals in addition to intranets, Liferay has a strong open
    source heritage and focus on developers. The vendor cultivates an established and diversified
    partner ecosystem to serve intranet design and deployments for clients across the globe. It has a
    well-defined set of solutions and buyers/influencers that it uses to drive its go-to-market approach
    and focus employee experience and knowledge management use cases, where it excels. Liferay’s
    product vision is also focused on infusing intelligent services into its stack but lags slightly in its
    delivery of low code and design tools to help customers tailor their intranet experience. Expect to
    see investment in analytics to help content owners get better usage insights, as well as more AI
    tools, including natural language processing (NLP) for better knowledge discovery.

    Liferay’s strengths include robust content repository services as well as a flexible metadata model
    and a cutting-edge search experience. Liferay has one of the more mature developer communities
    in this market. Current gaps include knowledge graphs to connect people and content as well
    as rich analytics to reveal relationships across content. Reference customers are satisfied with
    Liferay’s design and templating capabilities but report some dissatisfaction with application
    integration, including Microsoft 365. Shortlist Liferay when a flexible, open architecture is desirable
    and strong foundational content repository capabilities are required.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             11
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

 ›› LiveTiles excels in its design and templating tools but is thin on analytics. LiveTiles continues
    to build a global presence and rich set of digital employee experience tools via its services know-
    how and focused acquisitions. Its strategy is to build a comprehensive set of intelligent workplace
    capabilities with the intranet as a foundation on which to grow. The vendor has a clear focus
    on serving large global enterprises and will make investments to extend its platform breadth as
    well as establish a presence in key markets. LiveTiles supports cloud, hosted, and on-premises
    deployments. This risks an uneven pace of innovation and enhancement across different delivery
    models, and customers not on cloud could get stuck on older versions of the platform. Expect
    to see investments in reporting (including heatmaps), summarization, enterprise search, and
    employee-facing bots for information retrieval.

    Strengths include design and templating capabilities. Nondevelopers have the ability to tailor and
    tune the user interfaces, and users can personalize their preferred communication channels, such
    as Microsoft Teams or mobile notifications. Some dependencies on the Microsoft ecosystem for
    user profiling, collaboration, analytics, and search are weaknesses. Customer references rate the
    content authoring process and design tools very highly but are less satisfied with current reporting/
    dashboard tools. Integration with Microsoft 365 was called out as a plus. Shortlist LiveTiles when
    seeking an intranet platform that can serve design needs of large global brands and enrich the
    experience of existing Microsoft 365 investments.

 ›› Microsoft has strong foundational tools but is weak in personalizing user experiences.
    Microsoft is a dominant player in the content, collaboration, and office productivity markets, with
    substantial intranet deployments on-premises and in cloud. The breadth of product capabilities
    in the Microsoft 365 cloud stack continues to evolve, with a powerful, continually innovating set
    of products and intelligent services to enhance the intranet use case. Microsoft’s attention to
    employee experience as the centerpiece of a modern intranet strategy is lacking as it continues
    to focus on technical buyers rather than internal communications or design pros. Expect deep
    investment into knowledge graphs and additional use of AI and ML to deliver insights and connect
    content and people.

    Microsoft 365 delivers robust content repository and collaboration services that scale to meet the
    needs of the largest of enterprises. Weaknesses include lack of granular personalization controls,
    inconsistent governance across content and page types, and minimal reporting designed for
    intranet administrators. Reference customers express high satisfaction with content authoring
    and editing, as well as the product roadmap. Personalization and mobile are two areas that
    require improvement. Microsoft 365 should be evaluated by firms ready to modernize their
    on-premises or hosted SharePoint intranets or by firms that want a single vendor for content,
    collaboration, and communication.

 ›› Unily distills deep intranet services expertise into its emerging cloud platform. Unily provides
    a productized set of capabilities born from years of services expertise delivering intranet sites. Its
    cloud-native product vision allows it to innovate quickly and leverage a rich set of Microsoft Azure
    cloud services for AI, translations, and employee-facing chatbots. A crisp market focus emphasizes

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             12
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

    the employee experience. Unily’s partner strategy is in early stages, as it recruits systems
    integrators and consultants to drive future growth. While its own services organization brings rich
    experience, the vendor needs a broader partner ecosystem to help scale its reach and support
    customers with a global presence. Unily’s roadmap is collaborative, with customers able to vote on
    priorities, including app integrations. Watch for deeper use of Azure AI services, including NLP and
    employee-facing bots.

    Unily’s key strengths are rooted in its support for rich persona creation and targeted communications,
    a strong metadata model, and a well-defined “grid and widget” approach for consistent content
    modeling. Areas of improvement include search, which requires configuration to determine what text
    and metadata can be queried, and its default reporting capabilities. Reference customers rate its
    flexible design tools highly, as well as page versioning and audit trails. Areas of dissatisfaction include
    reporting, maturity of its AI, and search. Unily should be shortlisted by firms desiring a modern, cloud-
    native platform and by those that want to leverage the Microsoft ecosystem.

 ›› Interact delivers strong employee communication capabilities but lags in analytics. Interact
    is a pure-play, privately held intranet platform provider focused on employee communication,
    and, while it leverages Amazon Web Services (AWS) as its primary cloud infrastructure, Microsoft
    Azure is also supported. The vendor has a crisp product vision aimed at personalization,
    contextualization, and internal communication. Its licensing model reflects its customers’ varied
    business models, and employee personas are also a plus. Interact has an established partner
    model, however its reliance on its own in-house professional services can limit its ability to
    scale and grow globally. Expect ongoing investment from Interact of its partner marketplace for
    supported apps/widgets, deeper engagement analytics (such as email tracking), and mobility.

    Interact has notably strong governance capabilities for content, as well as flexible options for
    design tools, user interfaces, and rich, targeted internal communication tools. Current product
    weaknesses include reporting and dashboards and its ability to use content analytics to build
    relationships among pages/documents. Reference customers express very high satisfaction
    with Interact’s professional services team. Customers see its current mobile support and its
    reporting as needing improvement. Interact should be shortlisted by firms focused on employee
    communications and by those that prefer a platform in the AWS ecosystem.

Contenders

 ›› Atlassian excels in collaboration but lags in support for internal communications. Atlassian’s
    Confluence is broadly used by project teams to capture corporate knowledge and collaborate
    openly. Its product and market strategy will address broader sets of intranet use cases as it invests
    in AI and other intelligent services to enhance discoverability of people and content across an
    enterprise — not just across teams or lines of business. Its positioning and roadmap, however,
    must be better aligned to meet the needs of intranet decision makers from nontechnical teams,

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             13
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

    such as those in human resources, employee experience, or internal communications. Watch for
    ongoing investment into intelligent services, scalability, and simplified licensing for customers that
    use multiple Atlassian products.

    Notable product strengths include granular administrative controls over content creation,
    review, and consumption, as well as its collaboration capabilities. Personalization and internal
    communications are areas of weakness, with limited capabilities to define user personas and then
    tailor news or announcements to users’ preferred channels. Reference customers report consistent
    satisfaction with the ease of the content authoring experience, as well as richness of the APIs and
    integration capabilities. Branding and design tools, as well as its mobile experience, are described
    less favorably by customers. Atlassian should be considered when content-rich collaboration and
    an open approach to knowledge sharing are core intranet requirements.

 ›› SDL offers robust content services but must work to productize its intranet offering. SDL is a
    mature content platform serving internally and externally focused digital experience use cases and
    is noted for its strong translation capabilities. Its transition to a cloud-first, customizable framework
    means that customers will benefit from a faster pace of innovation. Investments are continuing in
    areas of current differentiation, including a strong information architecture, robust global partner
    ecosystem, and advanced translation services. SDL, however, must work to provide a more
    productized platform designed for the intranet and employee communication use cases. Intranet
    deployments today are services heavy. SDL’s roadmap priorities include improved user experience,
    more personalization options, and better content findability.

    SDL’s market maturity is reflected in strengths that few other vendors can claim, particularly its
    overall repository services, structured approach to content authoring, information architecture,
    developer support, and relatively mature use of AI. Areas of weakness include support for a broad
    set of employee communication channels, dashboards/reporting designed for intranet content
    owners, and overall collaboration capabilities. Reference customers rate SDL’s structured content
    creation and approval very highly and appreciate the vendor’s professional services. Reporting and
    dashboards, however, are areas of consistent dissatisfaction. Firms should consider SDL when the
    intranet serves global, often complex, lines of business and requires rigorous content modeling.

 ›› Aurea reinvests in Jive for the cloud era but risks holding on to its customer base. Aurea is
    modernizing Jive, porting it to the cloud, and leveraging AWS for infrastructure. Aurea’s strategy is to
    acquire and rearchitect mature products like Jive, make them available to Aurea’s broader clientele
    as part of a “one subscription” licensing model, and enable low-friction adoption by users of its
    other portfolio products. The platform’s focus on “people-centric collaboration” limits its appeal for
    enterprises prioritizing personalized, contextualized internal communications for their new intranet.
    Aurea’s strategy must focus on maintaining its market presence as an intranet platform while
    helping customers migrate to its cloud edition. Expect the Jive platform to enhance its underlying
    knowledge graph capabilities, to infuse intelligent content services, such as semantic search and AI,
    and to benefit from the foundational integration work done across the Aurea portfolio.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             14
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

    The Jive platform offers strong collaboration services, including support for communities, rich user
    profiles, and discussion moderation. Recognition and badging encourage employee engagement
    and participation. Current weaknesses include reporting and dashboards for technical and content
    administrators, integration capabilities with other enterprise applications, and flexibility of its
    metadata model. Reference customers report challenges migrating from on-premises to cloud
    editions and integrating with Microsoft 365. Collaboration and workspaces, as well as content
    authoring capabilities, are highly rated. Jive should be considered by customers that use other
    Aurea portfolio products when employee collaboration is a core requirement for an intranet platform.

Evaluation Overview
We evaluated vendors against 26 criteria, which we grouped into three high-level categories:

 ›› Current offering. Each vendor’s position on the vertical axis of the Forrester Wave graphic
    indicates the strength of its current offering. Key criteria for these solutions include content
    repository, creation and editing capabilities, design and user interface customization tools,
    integration with common enterprise and productivity apps, and a range of personalized internal
    communication capabilities.

 ›› Strategy. Placement on the horizontal axis indicates the strength of the vendors’ strategies. We
    evaluated the vendor’s market approach and product vision, its ability to execute on its roadmap,
    its partnership strategy, its related products and services, and how it delivers its platform.

 ›› Market presence. Represented by the size of the markers on the graphic, our market presence
    scores reflect each vendor’s license or subscription revenue attributable to its intranet platform
    offering, as well as the number of paying customers on the platform.

Vendor Inclusion Criteria

Forrester included 12 vendors in the assessment: Akumina, Atlassian, Aurea, Igloo Software, Interact,
Liferay, LiveTiles, LumApps, Microsoft, SDL, Simpplr, and Unily. Each of these vendors has:

 ›› A minimum product revenue of $10 million. The vendor has a minimum of $10 million annual
    revenue related to its intranet platform offering. This includes licensing, subscription, and
    maintenance, but not consulting services.

 ›› An intranet platform that is a packaged offering. The vendor offers an intranet platform
    packaged as a standalone solution and invests in go-to-market activities to attract, serve, and
    retain customers with this need.

 ›› A focus on enterprise clients. The vendor targets and can scale to meet the needs of large
    organizations and can support implementations serving 5,000 employees or above. Forrester
    customers demonstrate an active interest in the vendor’s offerings, including inquiry mentions and
    inclusion on shortlists.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             15
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                          June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

   Engage With An Analyst
   Gain greater confidence in your decisions by working with Forrester thought leaders to apply
   our research to your specific business and technology initiatives.

   Analyst Inquiry                                Analyst Advisory                                         Webinar

   To help you put research                       Translate research into                                  Join our online sessions
   into practice, connect                         action by working with                                   on the latest research
   with an analyst to discuss                     an analyst on a specific                                 affecting your business.
   your questions in a                            engagement in the form                                   Each call includes analyst
   30-minute phone session                        of custom strategy                                       Q&A and slides and is
   — or opt for a response                        sessions, workshops,                                     available on-demand.
   via email.                                     or speeches.
                                                                                                           Learn more.
   Learn more.                                    Learn more.

             Forrester’s research apps for iOS and Android.
             Stay ahead of your competition no matter where you are.

Supplemental Material

Online Resource

We publish all our Forrester Wave scores and weightings in an Excel file that provides detailed product
evaluations and customizable rankings; download this tool by clicking the link at the beginning of this
report on Forrester.com. We intend these scores and default weightings to serve only as a starting
point and encourage readers to adapt the weightings to fit their individual needs.

The Forrester Wave Methodology

A Forrester Wave is a guide for buyers considering their purchasing options in a technology
marketplace. To offer an equitable process for all participants, Forrester follows The Forrester Wave™
Methodology Guide to evaluate participating vendors.

                      © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             16
                      Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
For Application Development & Delivery Professionals                                                                              June 16, 2020
The Forrester Wave™: Intranet Platforms, Q2 2020
The 12 Providers That Matter Most And How They Stack Up

In our review, we conduct primary research to develop a list of vendors to consider for the evaluation.
From that initial pool of vendors, we narrow our final list based on the inclusion criteria. We then gather
details of product and strategy through a detailed questionnaire, demos/briefings, and customer
reference surveys/interviews. We use those inputs, along with the analyst’s experience and expertise in
the marketplace, to score vendors, using a relative rating system that compares each vendor against
the others in the evaluation.

We include the Forrester Wave publishing date (quarter and year) clearly in the title of each Forrester
Wave report. We evaluated the vendors participating in this Forrester Wave using materials they
provided to us by March 2020 and did not allow additional information after that point. We encourage
readers to evaluate how the market and vendor offerings change over time.

In accordance with The Forrester Wave™ Vendor Review Policy, Forrester asks vendors to review our
findings prior to publishing to check for accuracy. Vendors marked as nonparticipating vendors in the
Forrester Wave graphic met our defined inclusion criteria but declined to participate in or contributed
only partially to the evaluation. We score these vendors in accordance with The Forrester Wave™ And
The Forrester New Wave™ Nonparticipating And Incomplete Participation Vendor Policy and publish
their positioning along with those of the participating vendors.

Integrity Policy

We conduct all our research, including Forrester Wave evaluations, in accordance with the Integrity
Policy posted on our website.

Endnotes
1
    We surveyed 14,180 global information workers who use a calendar on a PC at least daily for work purposes. Source:
    Forrester Analytics Global Business Technographics® Workforce Benchmark Survey, 2019.

	See the Forrester report “Forrester’s EX Index: A Deeper Look At The Data.”
2

3
    Many companies choose to build their intranet upon popular digital experience platforms (DXP). This is especially true
    when they’ve already standardized on a tool for their externally facing websites and have cultivated internal, technical
    expertise with the platform or want to reuse branding and design elements. For example, Drupal is a popular choice,
    with vendor Acquia providing cloud deployments and with intranet specialist partners leading deployments. Other
    commonly used DXP platforms include Adobe Experience Manager, Sitecore, and WordPress. Some organizations
    will choose to take a more collaboration-centric approach to their intranet and adopt platforms such as Workplace by
    Facebook or extend their G Suite investments for their next-generation intranet.

	Employees use both tablets and smartphones to access their corporate intranets: 13% of global information workers
4

 who use a smartphone for work use their phone to access the intranet daily, and 26% use it to do so weekly; 18%
 of global information workers who use a tablet for work use it to access the corporate intranet daily, and 35% use it
 to do so weekly; desktop/laptop access still dominates, however, with 29% of global information workers who use a
 PC for work accessing the intranet via their PC daily and 43% weekly. Source: Forrester Analytics Global Business
 Technographics Workforce Benchmark Survey, 2019.

                          © 2020 Forrester Research, Inc. Unauthorized copying or distributing is a violation of copyright law.             17
                          Citations@forrester.com or +1 866-367-7378
forrester.com

We work with business and technology leaders to drive customer-
obsessed vision, strategy, and execution that accelerate growth.
Products and Services
››   Research and tools
››   Analyst engagement
››   Data and analytics
››   Peer collaboration
››   Consulting
››   Events
››   Certification programs

Forrester’s research and insights are tailored to your
role and critical business initiatives.
Roles We Serve
Marketing & Strategy              Technology Management            Technology Industry
Professionals                     Professionals                    Professionals
CMO                               CIO                              Analyst Relations
B2B Marketing                  ›› Application Development
B2C Marketing                     & Delivery
Customer Experience               Enterprise Architecture
Customer Insights                 Infrastructure & Operations
eBusiness & Channel               Security & Risk
Strategy                          Sourcing & Vendor
                                  Management

Client support
For information on hard-copy or electronic reprints, please contact Client Support at
+1 866-367-7378, +1 617-613-5730, or clientsupport@forrester.com. We offer quantity
discounts and special pricing for academic and nonprofit institutions.

                                                                                                    158844
You can also read