The Austrian Strategy for the Prevention and Countering of Violent Extremism and De-radicalisation
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Austrian Strategy for the Prevention and Countering of Violent Extremism and De-radicalisation
// PREFACE Radicalisation and extremism pose a major threat de-radicalisation in Austria. Federal ministries, civil for Austria, as they jeopardise the national security. organisations and the federal provinces are the For this reason, it is of particular concern to me members of BNED. in my function as Minister of the Interior to take appropriate and effective counter measures in this The “Austrian Strategy for the Prevention and context. Countering of Violent Extremism Prevention and De-radicalisation” substantiates the “fight against In order to inhibit radicalisation from arising in the subversive extremism and subversive radicalisation”, first place and to promote de-radicalisation, it is as it is laid down in the government programme particularly necessary to enact preventive measures 2017-2022. It supports the development of alongside the repressive measures, which are only interdisciplinary prevention and de-radicalisation taken when concrete threats arise. The Austrian measures in the fields of internal security and security authorities have adopted a national integration in Austria. approach in order to strengthen the interdisciplinary prevention and de-radicalisation measures. I am particularly pleased that around 70 members of BNED as well as experts from various areas of The present “Austrian Strategy for the Prevention society have been involved in the preparation of this and Countering of Violent Extremism and De- strategy. It is a testimony of the great willingness to radicalisation” marks a milestone in this context. address radicalisation and extremism at a national It is the first time that a nationally developed and level and to meet these challenges together. The coordinated strategy on handling radicalisation and present strategy is an essential cornerstone in this extremism is available. This strategy is intended to context. serve as an incentive and guide for all actors involved in prevention and de-radicalisation work in Austria. I would like to sincerely thank all actors involved in compiling this strategy and I look forward to our The “National Network for Prevention and continued excellent co-operation. Countering Violent Extremism and De-radicalisation” (BNED), founded by the Federal Ministry of the Herbert Kickl Interior in summer 2017 and coordinated by the Federal Ministry of the Interior Federal Agency for State Protection and Counter Terrorism, marked the starting point for this strategy. The BNED provides an overview on the respective strategies and pools the single measures of all actors working in the field of extremism prevention and
// HISTORICAL BACKGROUND In a reaction to growing radicalisation and recruitment tendencies in Austria, an increasing number of prevention and radicalisation measures all members of the Federal Network interested in this task. Moreover, external experts from the fields of research, civil society, people with practical were taken in Austria over the last couple of years. experience, organisations, etc. were integrated into the creation process. One major step was founding the “National Network for Prevention and Countering Violent Extremism The present strategy is a general and broad approach and De-radicalisation” (BNED) and including as many meant to be a guideline and offer orientation relevant players as possible, in order to regularly to all Austrian actors dealing with the topics of exchange views on current questions concerning preventing violent extremism and de-radicalisation. prevention and countering of violent extremism as Based on the present strategy, measures for the well as de-radicalisation work. It is the aim of this most important aspects of Austrian prevention network, to establish and legitimise new measures and de-radicalisation work will subsequently throughout Austria by adopting a national approach. be substantiated, the aim being to reinforce the strategic concept outlined in this present document At the request of BNED members, the Austrian by practical solutions. Federal Ministry of the Interior (BMI) in its function as initiator and coordinator of the network initiated a process aimed at developing an Austrian Strategy on “Prevention and Countering of Violent Extremism and De-radicalisation”. This was the first measure taken by BNED. Compared to international standards, Austria is one of the few countries which had not had such an official PVE/CVE strategy. This situation has been changed by the present document. The fact that a large number of actors were included into the developing process emphasises the intention to view extremism prevention and de-radicalisation as an issue which concerns society as a whole. This Austrian Strategy was developed in the course of a participative and transparent process involving
// SUMMARY The “Austrian Strategy for the Prevention and Countering of Violent Extremism and De- radicalisation” pools experiences and handling context are human rights and the protection of human dignity, the diversity of a democratic society and the values of coexistence negotiated within a practices of various occupational groups who society, such as respect, freedom of opinion, freedom are familiar with the subject of “PVE/CVE and from violence and a high level of individual freedom de-radicalisation” and it shall make a significant rights. Any ideology which approves violence and contribution to developing a responsible way of rejects human rights and democratic values poses dealing with this topic. The present document a risk to social cohesion. Thus, the central focus for concentrates on all forms of extremism and all players entrusted with extremism prevention describes individual areas of activity that are and de-radicalisation work in Austria is to counter particularly relevant for preventing violent extremist tendencies with all determination, without extremism and de-radicalisation work. undermining the guidelines defined in the present strategy. Extremism originates from radicalisation processes which can make individuals susceptible to an When compiling the present strategy, Austria extremist ideology, finally causing them to use used a large number of international and EU violence as a means for reaching their goals. This recommendations for orientation. Exemplary in challenge can be countered by PVE/CVE and de- this context are the “United Nations Global Counter radicalisation, which are comprehensive tasks, since Terrorism Strategy” from 2015, the EU directive all forms of extremism strive to weaken democracy “Preventing Radicalisation to Terrorism and Violent and the constitutional state and they mostly are Extremism: Strengthening the EU's Response” from co-dependent. Thus, in order to be able to meet this 2014 and a “Policy Paper” by the “Radicalisation challenge, it seems absolutely necessary to find a Awareness Network” (RAN) on the subject of solution involving society as a whole. It requires the “Development of a local prevention framework and co-operation of a large number of various players guidelines”. to be able to view and analyse the reasons for radicalisation from different perspectives and to The core concepts concerning extremism prevention resolutely counter them. and de-radicalisation were included into the strategy, based on international and European documents. Successful PVE/CVE and de-radicalisation work in The term “extremism” has been defined broadly and Austria is based on the fundamental principles of generally refers to all forms of extremism. the constitutional state and must serve as the basis for all players involved. The essential basis in this 6 \\ // 7
// SECURITY, THE PENAL SYSTEM AND the possibility to take part in social processes creates required in this context must be guaranteed on market, and by doing so, can significantly contribute RESOCIALISATION a feeling of belonging to an open and democratic a sustainable basis. Moreover, spaces have to be to the prevention of radicalisation and extremism. society. Such a society stands united against anti- created, where the players involved can exchange Moreover, increased promotion of qualification offers Violent extremism in all its manifestations poses a democratic and extremist forces and has enough target-oriented information. and employment promotion can create perspectives considerable threat to the Austrian society. Apart resilience to also meet the challenges of the future. for disadvantaged, marginalised individuals and from the security authorities, which play a key role Setting up a central point of coordination against groups. Hence, the sense of social security and social in repression, preventive measures have increased radicalisation and extremism would be an effective integration is strengthened, which, in turn, removes in importance. In order to reinforce the aspect of // CO-OPERATION AND RESOURCES approach for offering the widest possible range the basis for politically radical arguments, making a prevention, co-operation of all institutions relevant of awareness-raising measures and trainings contribution to combatting marginalisation that way. in this field is necessary. One essential objective of In order to be able to counter extremist ideologies, concerning radicalisation and extremism to a broad a macrosocial approach to fight extremism is the networking and co-operation is not only necessary target group and to support individuals prone to prevention of criminal acts and the containment of on an international level but also on the national radicalisation in the best possible way and in due // SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND HEALTH radicalisation processes preceding relevant offences, level. Mutual solidarity and co-operation is needed time. There is widespread agreement that raising and thus, threatening social cohesion in Austria. between the federal government, the federal awareness concerning subjects like extremism and When analysing the reasons for radicalisation, provinces and the communities. Responding to terrorism is the basis at all levels for taking effective exclusion mechanisms based of a societal and In order to guarantee resilience of the population the challenge of guaranteeing a stable democratic counter measures. structural nature have to be considered. Social and the state to radicalisation and extremism in the society in order to maintain social peace means responsibility and health comprise areas such as best way possible, it is necessary, on the one hand, to that this aim needs to be continuously pursued, a the labour market, professional education, the have national authorities, which, according to their large amount of commitment has to be displayed // EDUCATION, LABOUR MARKET AND social security system, child and youth welfare, protective function, effectively and proactively react so that the dialogue between all players involved is RESILIENCE social work at schools, youth work as well as health to possible offences, so that the desired effect caused promoted. promotion and health care. Likewise, different forms by extremist offences cannot be brought about. On of discrimination, on grounds of an individual’s sex or Education, be it either formal or non-formal, can the other hand, it is necessary to continue adopting Federal networks have proven to be appropriate gender identity, sexual orientation, origin or religion considerably contribute to making individuals the preventive macrosocial solution approach for the exchange between the federal ministries, are usually considered separately from each other. more resilient to radicalisation and extremism. In already initiated in Austria, alongside with practical the federal provinces and some specialist bodies When countering radicalisation and extremism, it this context, education has to be understood in a methods offering individuals a way out of extremist active across Austria. It would be a strong signal of is important to specifically focus on these societal, broader sense, as vocational training or the transfer environments. co-operation and jointly assumed responsibility, if social and health aspects. of knowledge, since it offers the possibility to remove the federal government, the federal provinces as inequalities and to promote inclusion on the job well as the cities and communities established the market. // SCIENCE AND RESEARCH // POLITICS AND DEMOCRATIC CULTURE respective networks in the near future by formulating concrete objectives and establishing key activities One of the essential objectives of prevention An inclusive education and labour market policy Strengthening democracy and democratic awareness in order to guarantee continuous and consistent of violent extremism and de-radicalisation is to supporting individuals in their abilities and needs is one of the essential prerequisites for cracking extremism prevention and a targeted promotion develop a responsible way of dealing with extremist can provide disadvantaged individuals with down on extremism. Interest in social matters and of democracy and human rights. The resources ideologies and to pool the respective methods which adequate access to education, training and the job 8 \\ // 9
are based on experience and practical knowledge. at the prevention of violent extremism and de- Over the last years, Austria has taken a large It is important to continue to analyse extremist radicalisation. number of initiatives and has set various actions to tendencies and their causes and to formulate joint counter extremism. Therefore, thanks to a broad solutions in order to adequately deal with this It is important to deal with extremist contents in understanding of prevention of violent extremism complex subject. Threats have to be specifically dealt various media in a competent way. Both, technical and de-radicalisation and a co-operative interaction with by applying secondary and tertiary prevention and sociopolitical measures have to be taken. For between the civil society players, official institutions, measures, without condemning and stigmatising this purpose, international networks are required, security authorities and the federal provinces, we individual groups of the population as a whole. since not only media providers but also some have arrived at an innovative and future-oriented extremist players are active across borders. It is in approach. One of the essential prerequisites for In order to be able to establish a systematic and this area that practical implementation, but also successful prevention work is the successful co- interdisciplinary type of extremism research, which research measures must take a stand, in order to operation of a large number of players. In the concentrates on a comprehensive examination of the guarantee that the respective measures can take years to come, it will be important to establish and subject fields identified and which is able to produce effect. In addition, the respective authorities and consolidate these structures in order to be able to knowledge-based inputs for practical and political internet service providers need to interact in order to continue to counter violent extremism by preventive, use, the respective structures need to be created create standardised regulations, as far as the use of or, whenever necessary, by reactive measures. first. the internet is concerned. In this context, the focus shall not only be on the fact that the media increase For this purpose, it could be useful to set up their competence but also on increasing their a publicly accessible data base on extremist responsibility. organisations and relevant results in this context. However, another idea would be to establish an independent, scientific competence centre to better // GENDER coordinate research activities and to use scientific resources and resources available to the authorities In the field of prevention of violent extremism more efficiently. and de-radicalisation, the role of gender equality is often regarded as only marginally important. Radical groups partly take advantage of this fact. // INTERNET AND THE MEDIA Apart from that, societies with higher gender equality are more resilient to extremism. Hence, it When analysing radicalisation processes, it becomes seems to be crucial to dedicate more attention to clear that the media promote these processes in this subject in the prevention of violent extremism many ways and can facilitate spreading extremist and de-radicalisation work and to consider it as an positions. Likewise, the media can be used for interdisciplinary issue in all measures to be taken. counter measures and alternative measures aimed 10 \\ // 11
// TABLE OF CONTENTS // PREFACE................................................................................................................................... 3 // HISTORICAL BACKGROUND..................................................................................................... 4 // SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................. 6 // TABLE OF CONTENTS............................................................................................................... 12 1.1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................... 14 1.2. Guidelines for prevention of violent extremism and de-radicalisation in Austria.......... 16 1.3. International recommendations on prevention of violent extremism and de-radicalisation.. 18 1.4. Definition of terms............................................................................................................... 20 2. Security, the penal system and resocialisation.................................................................... 23 3. Politics and democratic culture............................................................................................. 29 4. Co-operation and resources................................................................................................... 33 5. Education, labour market and resilience.............................................................................. 38 6. Social responsibility and health............................................................................................. 42 7. Science and Research............................................................................................................. 46 8. Internet and the media........................................................................................................... 48 9. Gender...................................................................................................................................... 51 // REFERENCES............................................................................................................................ 54 // LEGAL NOTICE.......................................................................................................................... 58 12 \\ // 13
1.1. INTRODUCTION individuals with practical experience in prevention // PREVENTION OF VIOLENT EXTREMISM many ideologies. Their ideas focus on feelings such of violent extremism and de-radicalisation work AND DE-RADICALISATION AS COMPLEX as fear, mistrust and rejection. Sustainable strategies as well as scientists agree upon the fact that and raising awareness in all sectors of society are Extremism in all its manifestations causes TASKS concern across Europe and is seen as a major different influencing factors can mutually intensify necessary to reduce the operative ability to act challenge. The population, the constitutional radicalisation processes and affect their course. and the geographical scope of extremist/terrorist What all forms of extremism have in common is system as well as the institutions and bodies of a This is reflected in the wide variety of requirements associations. their negative attitude towards the democratic democratic state and community can be impaired imposed on prevention of violent extremism and de- constitutional state. Fundamental democratic or paralysed by extremism, terrorist acts (as a radicalisation work. Security authorities, people with practical principles, such as the plurality of interests, the method of extremist actors) and hate crimes. experience in prevention of violent extremism and multiparty system as well as the right to opposition There is broad consensus that curbing extremism de-radicalisation work as well as representatives are being negated. Extremist groups pose a particular The “National Strategy for Prevention of Violent in all its manifestations and containing its causes from the field of science have determined numerous challenge to the democratic order. These groups are Extremism and De-Radicalisation” contributes to pose a challenge not be met by repressive methods challenges and threats which are relevant for based on anti-democratic ideologies, whose aim is to structuring and sustainably tackling this challenge. alone. On the contrary, numerous actors have to conceptualising and implementing future prevention undermine democracy and social cohesion. The present document pools the experience and co-operate and such co-operation shall be based on and de-radicalisation measures in Austria. Therefore, handling practices of various occupational groups a macrosocial solution approach. The aim shall be to it can be assumed that anti-democratic ideologies Therefore, when analysing and developing strategies familiar with the topic of “prevention of violent analyse and evaluate extremist tendencies and their and attitudes will not lose their appeal in the in the field of prevention of violent extremism extremism and de-radicalisation” and shall make causes from different points of view and to formulate future. Progressive radicalisation tendencies and and de-radicalisation, you cannot focus solely on a significant contribution to handling this topic macrosocial strategies and solution approaches, an increasing number of recruiting attempts have individual manifestations of extremism. As a matter responsibly. which live up to the complexity of the topic. to be viewed as a realistic scenario, regardless of of fact, extremism is based on approaches and any specific form of extremism. Particular attention attitudes which are mutually dependent, which show The effectiveness of these strategies and approaches must be paid to the fact that offences cannot only reciprocal dynamics and which even provoke each essentially depends on how and to which extent be committed by groups but also by radicalised // A MACROSOCIAL APPROACH AS A other. Taking into account the similarity in character, public and civil society institutions and organisations single perpetrators, as it has increasingly been the SOLUTION MODEL can be connected and if permanent, binding and it is thus necessary to select a broad term for case. Therefore, the population, the constitutional extremism to contain radicalisation and extremism. target-oriented co-operation alliances can be system as well as the institutions and bodies of the The starting point of extremism, in all its In order to prevent subversive extremism, a holistic established. The need for this endeavour exists at all democratic state and community will continue to manifestations, lies within a radicalisation process. and macrosocial approach is ultimately required, levels of action as well as at the local and national be confronted with scenarios in the future, calling They make individuals susceptible to extremist integrating the inter-ministerial, institutional, level. for active counteraction taken as early as possible. ideologies and ultimately to violence as a legitimate administrative, non-governmental and scientific These actions shall be taken on the premise of a tool for achieving their goals. When analysing levels. This has to be taken into account when macrosocial solution approach. The present strategy these processes, it becomes evident that they are conceiving counter-measures. shall be regarded as a foundation for these actions very complex phenomena, which always have and shall serve as a means of orientation. to be regarded in the context of socio-economic Moreover, hostilities and a dichotomous pattern of and global-political factors. Security authorities, “friend-enemy” provide the ideal breeding ground for 14 \\ // 15
1.2. GUIDELINES FOR PREVENTION prerequisites without which a democratic society the needs of the population. Building on this, the Issues regarding identity and affiliation are cannot work. protection and promotion of human rights and not only dealt with at a normative but also at a OF VIOLENT EXTREMISM AND DE- the respect for human dignity should be in the material-structural level. They are linked to social, RADICALISATION IN AUSTRIA Extremist tendencies often originate from a small focus of prevention and de-radicalisation work. In economic, political and cultural possibilities of minority within a society. However, under certain this way, orientation is offered for all discourses participation. A normative discussion on coexistence In order to manage prevention of violent conditions, they can have the potential of radicalising and all macrosocial negotiation processes which of individuals must also tackle the issues of extremism and de-radicalisation work in Austria large parts of society. If a society can firmly trust in centre around the preservation and promotion of inclusion and participation against the background successfully, basic principles and guidelines its democratic system, this confidence can serve as democratic norms. of social inequalities, barriers and discrimination. need to be defined, which offer orientation for all a fundamental protective shield against extremism In prevention of violent extremism and de- players involved. In the following, it is intended in all its various manifestations. If citizens are given On the basis of human rights it is specified that group radicalisation work, topics such as sensitivity and the to give an overview of the basic principles and the opportunity to actively participate in democratic rights must not violate the dignity and rights of the significance of gender as an interdisciplinary issue guidelines which shall serve as a basis for the processes, extremist tendencies can be proactively individual and, thus, are subordinate to the rights of have to be considered accordingly. present strategy and for the implementation counteracted. For this reason, the overriding the individual. Conversely, this means that collective of concrete prevention and de-radicalisation principles of prevention and de-radicalisation work rights, which safeguard the dignity and the rights of measures in Austria. must be to strengthen the democratic constitutional the individual and promote his or her participation in // CIVIL LIBERTIES AS A BASIS FOR state and to safeguard the conditions under which it society, are to be welcomed and protected. COEXISTENCE WITHIN A SOCIETY One of the biggest challenges for a democratic can work. Children’s rights2 have a particular status. constitutional state is how to deal with anti- Promoting these central rights of children and democratic (up to extremist) tendencies. In order to Democratic, pluralist societies are characterised In their daily work, all players involved in prevention young individuals, developing their possibilities of be able to counter such tendencies in our society, by a high degree of individual civil liberties which and de-radicalisation activities have to consider the participating in and shaping social life and protecting rules and mechanisms are required which make it form the basis of our coexistence. Civil liberties can guidelines outlined and sustainably comply with children and young individuals are top priorities. possible to act against anti-democratic and extremist be restricted by the state authorities, in order to them. tendencies, without damaging the basic principles of maintain public order and to ensure the security of the constitutional state. the people. At the same time, the state authorities, // IDENTITY, DIVERSITY AND AFFILIATION in compliance with the principle of proportionality, // HUMAN RIGHTS AND HUMAN DIGNITY are obliged to guarantee that the benefit of such The Austrian federal constitution and the AS BASIC PRINCIPLES In a democratic society, diversity needs to measures outweighs the restrictions caused by them. constitutional values derived from it form the be reflected and proactively promoted in all Particularly, if the freedom of children and young foundation for a peaceful coexistence in Austria. At Human rights, as defined in the Universal Declaration educational, social and security-relevant service individuals is restricted by certain measures, the the same time, basic principles like liberalism, the of Human Rights1, and human dignity as it is laid sectors. This aim is to be pursued while bearing focus must be on the children’s well-being and the rule of law, democracy, the republic state, federalism down therein, form the normative basis for all in mind that societal diversity requires jointly opportunities of development for children and young and the separation of powers, but also fundamental societies which are based on social and liberal negotiated values and rules for coexisting, such individuals. values such as justice, respect, tolerance, gender principles. They guarantee that the constitutional as respect, freedom of opinion and freedom from equality and sociopolitical participation as well state is oriented towards the common good and violence, in order to promote a respectful, social as ensuring social security are further central coexistence and equal opportunities for all. 1 Universal Declaration of Human Rights (A/RES/217, UN-Doc. 217/A-(III)), 2 Convention on the Rights of the Child https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails. URL: http://www.un.org/depts/german/menschenrechte/aemr.pdf, 24/01/2018 aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&lang=en, 24.01.2018 16 \\ // 17
// DEVALUATION IDEOLOGIES AND of non-violent communication are observed in all The “United Nations Global Counter Terrorism private sector, GROUP-FOCUSED MISANTHROPY public discourses and that the means for promoting Strategy”, which was adopted in 2015 and adapted in • further research on radicalisation tendencies them are reinforced. In order to render prevention July 2016, constitutes an example in this context. The and evaluation of existing practices, of violent extremism and de-radicalisation work focus of this strategy rests upon four pillars: • closer co-operation with partner countries to Any ideology which supports violence and rejects sustainable, the borders between verbal violence and • the identification of influencing factors prevent and combat radicalisation within and a society which is based on human rights and the freedom of opinion should be clearly defined, facilitating the propagation of terrorism; outside of the European Union5. democratic values, poses a risk to social cohesion. explained, communicated and executed. • measures to prevent and combat terrorism; Thus, any form of extremism must receive due • the establishment of national resources to In addition to these two official documents, the attention. The focus of prevention of violent To summarise, the central guideline for sustainable prevent and combat terrorism as well as European Union published a policy paper of the extremism and de-radicalisation work is not only on prevention and de-radicalisation work in Austria strengthening the role of the United Nations in “Radicalisation Awareness Network” (RAN) in 2016, groups and individuals advocating violence, but also shall be to decisively counter extremist tendencies this field; entitled “Developing a local prevention framework on individuals who advocate and spread tendencies while preferably including all relevant players, • respecting human rights and the rule of law4. and guiding principles”. This document specifically which are racist, sexist or hostile to pluralism. without undermining the basic principles of the highlights the importance of co-operating at a local constitutional state and the fundamental values At the European level, the most relevant directive level. Group-focused misanthropy and devaluating derived from it. in this context is the one from the year 2014, “The attitudes form the breeding ground for extremism. The following points are included in the report: They can assume disintegrating proportions, which prevention of radicalisation leading to terrorism and might even threaten democracy. For this reason, violent extremism: reinforcement of the EU action”. • a suggestion for a common framework for joint efforts are needed at all structural and societal 1.3. INTERNATIONAL The document indicates that the responsibilities for structuring prevention and action points to levels, in order to find solutions which can be used RECOMMENDATIONS ON designing and implementing measures to prevent develop a local strategy or an action plan; to effectively counter devaluation ideologies and PREVENTION OF VIOLENT and combat radicalisation lie with the member • practical advice on specific problems in the field ideologies of inequality. In order to contain these EXTREMISM AND DE- states, but that the phenomenon of radicalisation of prevention; is, in many ways, supranational. This directive • concrete practical experiences concerning the problem areas, specific measures in the fields of RADICALISATION prevention, information and research as well as focusses, among other things, on the following definition of problems and guiding principles, in the fight against the phenomena are required, recommendations for preventing radicalisation: which, in the form of a “checklist”, will Over the last couple of years, an increasing among other things. subsequently support individuals doing practical number of countries have developed national • prevention of radicalisation by consolidating work in developing their own action plans or strategies and action plans for the prevention expert knowledge, Freedom of opinion is the basic condition of any strategies6. of violent extremism and de-radicalisation. • training in the prevention of radicalisation, freedom and it is constitutive for a functioning • development of exit strategies for violent As early as in 2014, the European Commission Therefore, numerous international and EU democracy. Limitations on the freedom of opinion extremism, called upon member states to develop their own recommendations provide guidance to Austria are to be set, when individuals or groups are being • closer co-operation with civil society and the prevention strategies7. This demand is met by the with regard to establishing its own prevention and discriminated and degraded on grounds of certain de-radicalisation structures3. 4 Translated from English; see UNGCTS, July 2016 (A/RES/70/291) : https://www.un.org/counterterrorism/ctitf/en/un-global-counter-terrorism-strategy, characteristics. It must be seen to it that the rules 25/05/2018 5 See communication of the European Commission, January 2014 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_ 3 See, among others, “United Nations Global Counter Terrorism Strategy“ (UNGCTS; A/70/674, dated 24/12/2015, also adapted in July com(2013)0941_/com_com(2013)0941_de.pdf, 25/05/2018 2016 (A/RES/70/291)); EU directive “The prevention of radicalisation leading to terrorism and violent extremism: reinforcement of the 6 See RAN strategy paper 2016: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/ EU action” (15/01/2014); Communication of the European Commission “The prevention of radicalisation leading to terrorism and radicalisation_awareness_network/ran-papers/docs/policy_paper_developing_local_prevent_framework_guiding_112016_de.pdf, 25/05/20187 violent extremism: reinforcement of the EU action” (15/01/2014) as well as the policy paper of the Radicalisation Awareness Network 7 See communication of the European Commission, January 2014: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_ (RAN) “Developing a local prevent framework and guiding principles” (November 2016). com(2013)0941_/com_com(2013)0941_de.pdf. 28/05/2018 18 \\ // 19
present document. Following international and EU religious or any other ideological world view aiming or an international organisation and is defined // SECONDARY PREVENTION recommendations, the topic of de-radicalisation and at bringing about fundamental changes in the as a criminal act according to national law, if it is prevention of violent extremism cannot be analysed classification system of a society. Radicalisation committed with the aim As for secondary prevention, this target group can be seperately for each member state. On the contrary, does not inevitably result in the use of violence and defined more accurately and support for challenging I. of seriously intimidating a population or it appears expedient to continuously exchange violation of the law. In a democratic state based on life situations is offered. This target group generally II. unduly compelling a government or an views on this topic through co-operation within the rule of law, the mere conviction about a radical comprises individuals who are at risk of radicalising international organisation to perform or abstain the international association and to create suitable idea per se is not criminally relevant. Extremism often from performing an act or themselves and who engage with individuals networks in this context. The focus should not only comes in when violence is used to push through an III. seriously destabilising or destroying the showing the first signs of radicalisation. This target be on the co-operation at the “policy level” but also individual conviction. fundamental political, constitutional, group has not yet committed any acts relevant to on the promotion of co-operation between science economic or social structures of a country or an criminal law. That is why the aim is to consider the and civil society. These demands and experiences // EXTREMISM international organisation8. social, legal and the socio-psychological situations form the basis and guidelines for the present of the individuals concerned and to counter any Austrian strategy for the prevention of extremism and The term extremism derives from the Latin word violations of legal norms. On the one hand secondary de-radicalisation. “extremus” meaning “utmost”. “Extremism”, thus, prevention addresses the individual difficulties // PREVENTION describes a political, religious or ideological attitude of these people, while on the other hand anti- which has arrived at its “utmost” form. The aim is discrimination training programmes are offered to In the context at hand, prevention refers to the 1.4. DEFINITION OF TERMS to completely change the classification system of identification and conception of strategies and the identified groups of individuals. a society. In order to achieve this goal, the use of measures which aim at containing the risk of In the following chapter the essential terms violence and force is a legitimate tool in extremism. radicalisation and extremism. relevant for the present strategy are defined. The present strategy does not list individual forms // TERTIARY PREVENTION These terms are to be regarded as working of extremism. In this way, it is made clear that it definitions and are oriented towards European is essential not to focus on individual forms of // PRIMARY PREVENTION Tertiary prevention is aimed at individuals having and international documents dealing with extremism when implementing prevention and de- committed offences punishable under criminal law. prevention of violent extremism and de- radicalisation measures, but to always keep an eye Primary or universal radicalisation prevention aims The intent is to prevent them from resuming their radicalisation. on extremism in all its various manifestations. at reaching as many social groups as possible. The extremist patterns of behaviour. This target group objective is to build awareness of the general risks of comprises, among others, individuals stemming from // RADICALISATION // TERRORISM pertinent extremist environments and persons who radicalisation among the target groups addressed. The term “terrorist act” refers to one of the For primary prevention this means strengthening want to leave this environment. Tertiary prevention Radicalisation is the process of individual, cognitive social security, democratic culture and human rights aims at re-integrating and re-socialising individuals intentional acts listed below, which, given their and behaviour-based adaptation to a political, education. Primary prevention is not addressed to by offering social, legal and socio-psychological care nature or context, may seriously damage a country any specific target group. facilities on the one hand and ideology-critical work and discussions on violent-extremist views of the 5 Siehe Mitteilung der EU Kommission, Jänner 2014: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2013)0941_/com_ com(2013)0941_de.pdf, 25.05.2018 world on the other. 6 Siehe RAN-Strategiepapier, November 2016: https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/networks/radicalisation_awareness_ network/ran-papers/docs/policy_paper_developing_local_prevent_framework_guiding_112016_de.pdf, 25.05.2018 7 Siehe Mitteilung der EU-Kommission, Jänner 2014: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/com/com_com(2013)0941_/com_ com(2013)0941_de.pdf. 28. 05. 2018 8 Council Common Position of 27 December 2001 on the application of specific measures to combat terrorism, 2001/931/GASP 20 \\ // 21
// DE-RADICALISATION 2. SECURITY, THE PENAL SYSTEM // THREAT ANALYSIS WITH REGARD TO AND RESOCIALISATION RADICALISATION AND EXTREMISM De-radicalisation comes in, if the degree of radicalisation is very advanced and the risk arises Violent extremism in all its manifestations poses a // THE MEANING OF SECURITY AS A that individuals endanger themselves and/or others. considerable threat to the Austrian society. Timely Efforts are made to initiate a dialogue with these CENTRAL TASK OF THE STATE detection and aversion of threats, which can be people, to motivate them to accept changes and posed by radicalised individuals or groups, are the to trigger processes inducing them to distance Security is a fundamental human need. As it is challenges the state needs to tackle. themselves from ideologies. the case with all basic needs, it only acquires individual meaning, if it is non-existent or Long-term trend descriptions provided by severely lacking. The prosperity and quality of life the Austrian security authorities dealing with of a society considerably depend on the security // DISENGAGEMENT security-related developments indicate a growing prevailing in a country. Social security, social polarisation and fragmentation of our society. justice and the protection of fundamental human These circumstances can provide the respective Disengagement rather refers to the behavioural than needs are prerequisites for social peace in a breeding ground for radicalising groups, which are to the cognitive level and signifies dissociation from society and can, therefore, be essential resilience also prepared to use violent extremist methods to extremist or terrorist activities. factors against radicalisation and extremism. articulate their goals. An increasing number of social tensions, disenchantment with politics, ethnical For this purpose, on the one hand measures to conflicts within the society, challenges posed by // ALTERNATIVE NARRATIVES avert dangers are required. The threat analysis local separatist movements (mostly in the urban forms the respective foundation for managing the environment9) and the acceleration of change Alternative narratives are positive alternatives use of means and resources and for a crisis-proof processes caused by digitalisation (e.g. filter bubbles, to extremist propaganda. They primarily aim at management structure of the state. On the other parallel societies, objective facts or pseudo-truths) deconstructing or at de-legitimising extremist hand an increased focus should also be put on the all are manifestations of this development. On the narratives. psychological component when conveying a sense one hand globalisation increases the importance of of security. This component substantially influences internationality and its consequences on daily life, the way dangerous situations are being dealt with. but on the other hand, it also leaves parts of the In addition to this, and by providing objective society with a feeling of powerlessness and being information, the threat analysis shall also oppose on the losing side. Another trend to be observed false, socially effective narratives, which can lead to concerns the dwindling role of the state vis-à-vis its an inaccurate threat assessment, followed by fighting own society. This role could partially be taken on by the wrong causes. other actors. 9 Developing so-called “No Go Areas”, to which public organisations and security authorities do not have any access (or just restricted access). These areas can be based on an ethnic background or a(n) (organised) criminal background. In most cases, it is a mixture of both. 22 \\ // 23
The polarisation perceived in public discourse is potential. As a consequence of structures which // TAKING MACROSOCIAL ACTION AGAINST Individuals who have already attracted attention particularly relevant in terms of security and is one are perceived as being more and more motivated RADICALISATION AND EXTREMISM due to their divergent and dangerous behaviour, of the increasing challenges for the entire Austrian by politics and ideologies and which are formed with regard to extremism, need to be provided society when it comes to maintaining public apart from public and democratic processes, it has with an individually tailored support service as The sustainable achievement of goals requires a peace, order and security. Continuous analyses become increasingly necessary to implement an early as possible. This support service shall offer number of national measures, which are entrenched and preventive measures adapted to the latest additional number of prevention measures to avert the possibility to work on their criminal behaviour in different governmental and non-governmental development tendencies are required to successfully radicalisation and recruitment processes. In recent and shall provide them with perspectives and sectors. At the same time, target-group oriented deal with these developments also in future. years, this approach has been progressively adopted. alternatives to their actions so that they can live their and awareness-raising measures promoting a better lives according to the principles of the European understanding of violent extremism play a central When analysing and planning measures, it is Prevention work has to be based on the approach of Convention on Human Rights. role, but so do specific interdisciplinary, cross- essential to comprehend the phenomenon of thinking globally and acting locally, as the borders ideological and multiprofessional de-radicalisation extremism at a social and individual level. The between internal and external security become Tertiary prevention can only be successful, if measures adopted by qualified professionals. concrete danger always emanates from individuals; increasingly blurred. Security agencies, which due essential protective factors for social rehabilitation they either instrumentalise other people or carry out to statutory regulations are assigned the task of and/or reintegration are provided and reinforced. The essential goal at the individual level is to detect acts of violence themselves. safeguarding public peace, order and security, and stop the propensity to violence. Individually continuously monitor and analyse the security In order to reach these goals, a professional and tailored decisions on implementing support In the radicalisation process of an individual, situation outside of Austria and in Europe in order to interdisciplinary approach is required as well as a measures and necessary coercive measures are numerous aspects play an important role, which be able to offer appropriate responses to threats. qualified and interlinked staff. A continuous and essential. When implementing individual measures, can also be highly influenced by external actors10 transparent exchange between the professionals it is important to evaluate the resource- and and an individual’s social environment. Therefore, An effective threat prevention is only possible, if involved and of their observations is an essential solution-oriented approach and to bear in mind the a reflective discussion about the topic of security radicalisation and extremism are dealt with at a prerequisite for reducing further delinquencies. perpetrator-victim-issue. in Austria cannot be held without addressing the national (“Whole of Government Approach”) and/ Strengthening the resources and pinpointing risks external influences and the social situation in Austria. or macrosocial (“Whole of Society Approach”) level. seems to be the essential task and in order to Individuals who do not have sufficient and complete The Austrian security authorities have considerable complete this, a deliberate use of primary, secondary access to the economic opportunities in our society interest in regularly exchanging views with as and tertiary prevention is required as well as a and who do not have a determining influence // PREVENTION AS A TOOL FOR THREAT many actors from the field of prevention of violent on society are particularly vulnerable to being clear understanding on the part of the institutions MITIGATION extremism and de-radicalisation work as possible concerned and interdisciplinary thinking on the part compromised by extremism. in order to ensure a high degree of quality when of the stakeholders. In addition to this, working in Alongside classic repressive measures taken by a processing this subject matter. a connected work environment and being familiar However, education and the possibility to participate state, which are specifically used to avert danger with the tasks, orders and objectives of the other alone do not guarantee that individuals do not and to minimise the damage, prevention as an institutions also is beneficial. become radicalised. There are many current and instrument has assumed an increasingly important historical examples proving that extremist groups are role being an additional tool for mitigating the threat A fundamental prerequisite for a successful also led by educational elites. prevention of radical and extremist tendencies is 10 These external actors (states, state-like and other organisations disposing of instruments of violence and having violent potential) are to be allocated outside of the Austrian society and they want to fight it, no matter the national territory they are currently in. Thus, every actor taking action against the Austrian state and its society in a structural fashion is to be regarded as an external actor. 24 \\ // 25
offering people perspectives, enabling them to sentenced to conditional imprisonment shows that, be taken in the preliminary stages, apart from de- further action. The determination of the necessary participate in social standards. Social security can compared to other extremist manifestations, there radicalisation and dissociation measures, although security measures shall also be included. only be established, if the goal of our society is have been significantly more convictions pursuant to they have comparatively little influence. inclusion and the necessary future perspectives are the National Socialism Prohibition Act. The aim is to adopt an individualised approach offered to arrive at this aim. At the same time, it has Even though experience has been gathered within with a differing indication, whereas the individual to be ensured that the perspectives offered are also It is also relevant for the penal system to know the penal system over the last decades of how decisions concerning the indication always depend accepted. the reasons for radicalisation and the formation to deal with political extremism, various forms on the estimated danger the respective detainee of cognitive and violent extremism. Ultimately, of religious extremism sometimes still pose new poses (no binary characteristic, but a continuous, appropriate de-radicalisation and dissociation challenges. As extremists do not form a homogenous multidimensional one). Particularly with extremist // THE PENAL SYSTEM AND SOCIAL measures (in the sense of “disengagement”) can group in prison either, the motivation and problem detainees with very distinct risk features, being REHABILITATION only be taken, if reliable scientific answers to these areas to be taken into account when developing expressed in different areas of life, prisons are questions exist. Especially dissociation measures de-radicalisation and dissociation measures are required to provide interdisciplinary team work must be of particular importance for the penal manifold. That is why the individualisation principle on the common basis of the case concept. A Compared to the rest of Europe, the Austrian system, as their goal is to ensure the legal conduct has to be applied in the penal system, insofar as professional co-operation between the judicial police legal situation and jurisdiction set forth that of the convicted offender following his or her release possible and appropriate. Since neither general and the specialist departments as well as through individuals who are detained for having conducted from prison. Alongside the numerous challenges crime-conducive factors can already provide the support of external experts and centres providing (or attempted to commit) offences relating to posed by detainees accused or already convicted for sufficient explanations for radicalisation processes follow-up support, alternatives to the extremist extremism and terrorism are dealt with relatively extremism motivated offences, a major problem is nor can the mere establishment of correlations explanation and indoctrination patterns have to strictly. The number of individuals detained (in constituted by the fact that detainees in general are between social or socio-economic prerequisites and be presented, offering an escape from fatal group provisional detention or in prison) for the most more responsive to extremist patterns and systems of the different manifestations of cognitive and violent dynamics. relevant extremist offences (pursuant to § 278b to f interpretation. extremism in its own right form a solid basis for and 282a of the Austrian Penal Code) has constantly differentiated and specific counter-measures. However, it always has to be considered that alleged been increasing and poses new challenges for the Prisons are always institutions in which risk factors or real injustices and experiences of helplessness or Austrian law enforcement authorities. Nevertheless, tend to culminate. At these institutions, troublesome Especially in prison environments, the vast majority humiliation can easily be seen as a confirmation of a the members of this group amount to less than one individuals are detained under difficult conditions, of individuals show a certain type of characteristics personal and/or structural disadvantage experienced percent of all prison inmates (as of July 2018), which which are often also partially caused by the large or a combination of characteristics, which is why due to an ideology, giving rise to an acceleration of is a manageable number. share of foreign detainees (over 50 % in 2018). concepts following the disintegration theory concepts of the enemy on the part of the detainee. For this reason, prisons always have to be seen as (marginalisation, alienation, discrimination, etc.) Such a momentum can effect and impede the efforts Also, the reports and convictions for National critical locations with regard to radicalisation and only have a subordinate explanatory value. With made for social rehabilitation even until after an Socialist reactivation pursuant to the National the formation of cognitive or violent extremism particular regard to the role of the political and/ individual’s release from prison or custody. Socialism Prohibition Act have increased over the and they are significant areas of recruitment. Even or religious ideology and the significance of group last couple of years and hate and slander have not though it cannot be assumed at the moment that dynamic processes, an ideographic theory, a pattern However, it is in any case essential to acknowledge only become a pressing problem on the Internet. The radicalisation in prisons is numerically relevant, of the conditions and/or a case concept have to be that acquiring a full understanding of de- amount of support services provided for individuals appropriate secondary measures always have to developed for every single detainee as a basis for any radicalisation and taking into account all forms of 26 \\ // 27
You can also read