Tattoo-Associated Uveitis
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Tattoo-Associated Uveitis TRUCIAN A. OSTHEIMER, BRYN M. BURKHOLDER, THERESA G. LEUNG, NICHOLAS J. BUTLER, JAMES P. DUNN, AND JENNIFER E. THORNE PURPOSE: To describe the clinical presentation of uve- of systemic sarcoidosis.1 This was followed, in 1969, by the itis with coincident onset of raised and indurated tattooed first case series to describe bilateral intraocular inflamma- skin. tion with the simultaneous development of tattoo granu- DESIGN: Case series. lomas in 3 patients felt to have no evidence of systemic METHODS: Seven consecutive patients were evaluated sarcoidosis at the time of presentation.2 The pathologic at a tertiary ophthalmologic facility with coincident uve- hallmark of sarcoidosis is the noncaseating granuloma; itis and cutaneous tattoo induration over an 18-month however, it remains a diagnosis of exclusion because of its period. All subjects underwent complete ophthalmic lack of pathognomonic histopathology, imaging, or sero- examination and a focused systemic medical evaluation logic studies.3 Among patients with sarcoidosis, anywhere including serologic testing and imaging studies. Two par- from 25% to 80% may suffer from ocular or adnexal ticipants underwent biopsy of their tattoos. The patients’ involvement,4 and approximately 25%–35% of patients clinical courses and responses to treatment over a follow- develop cutaneous findings.3 Anterior uveitis is the most up period of 1–20 months are reported (mean follow- common ocular manifestation of sarcoidosis, occurring in up [ 9 months). Main outcome measures included degree 65% of patients with ophthalmic involvement.3 of intraocular inflammation, ocular complications, visual We present 7 patients with no prior diagnosis of sarcoid- acuity, clinically observable tattooed skin changes, and osis who developed bilateral uveitis in temporal association biopsy results. with inflammation of tattooed skin. RESULTS: Five of 7 patients had bilateral nongranulom- atous anterior uveitis: 4 with chronic and 1 with recurrent disease. The remaining 2 patients had bilateral chronic granulomatous panuveitis. Biopsies of raised and indurated METHODS tattoos were performed in 2 patients and demonstrated A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF 7 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS noncaseating granulomatous inflammation surrounding with bilateral uveitis and associated cutaneous changes sug- tattoo ink in the dermis. The skin changes resolved in all gestive of tattoo inflammation evaluated over a 20-month patients, with a faster response noted in those treated period was conducted at the Division of Ocular Immu- with high-dose oral prednisone for intraocular inflamma- nology, Wilmer Eye Institute. The study was approved by tion. Five patients subsequently experienced recurrent the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine Institutional flares of intraocular inflammation in conjunction with Review Board and adhered to all tenets of the Declaration the recurrence of raised and indurated tattoos. CONCLUSIONS: These cases represent a subset of of Helsinki. All patient data were handled in accordance with the Health Information Portability and Account- patients in whom skin tattooing may have incited an ability Act. immune response leading to simultaneous inflammation All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic of the eyes and tattooed skin. (Am J Ophthalmol examination and received a medical evaluation (Table) 2014;158:637–643. Ó 2014 by Elsevier Inc. All rights in an attempt to rule out syphilis (fluorescent treponemal reserved.) antibody-absorption [FTA-ABS] and rapid plasma reagin testing [RPR]) and sarcoidosis (chest x-ray and/or computed tomography [CT] chest, serum angiotensin- I N 1952, LUBECK AND EPSTEIN PUBLISHED THE FIRST report of a patient with bilateral intraocular inflamma- converting enzyme [ACE] and/or serum lysozyme). Testing tion and simultaneous tattoo granulomas in the setting for HLA-B27 positivity and infectious etiologies such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Toxoplasma gondii, Bartonella henselae, and Borrelia burdorferi was performed in selected Accepted for publication May 16, 2014. patients. Two of the 7 patients underwent biopsy of their From Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of inflamed tattoos. The patients’ clinical courses and Medicine (T.A.O., B.M.B., T.G.L., N.J.B., J.P.D., J.E.T.); and Department of Epidemiology, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns responses to treatment were reviewed over a follow-up Hopkins University (J.E.T.), Baltimore, Maryland. period of 1–20 months. James P. Dunn is currently employed at the Wills Eye Institute, Phila- delphia, Pennsylvania. Inquiries to Trucian A. Ostheimer, Wilmer Eye Institute, 600 N Wolfe SELECTED CASE REPORT: PATIENT 1: Patient 1 was a 20- St, Woods 476, Baltimore, MD 21287; e-mail: tosthei1@jhmi.edu year-old African-American man who initially presented for 0002-9394/$36.00 Ó 2014 BY ELSEVIER INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 637 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2014.05.019
638 TABLE. Patient Demographics and Findings in Tattoo-Associated Uveitis Intraocular Sarcoidosis Follow-up Patients Demographics Initial VA Inflammation Uveitic Evaluationa Evaluationa Tattoo Findings Tattoo Biopsy Ocular Complications Treatment Duration 1 20yo AAM OD(sc): 20/100, OS(sc): Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- ACE, chest Elevation/induration of Noncaseating OU: posterior Mycophenolate mofetil, 13 months 20/400; PHNI OU granulomatous B27, IGRA, Lyme x-ray (32) skin tattooed with granulomatous synechiae, oral prednisone, chronic panuveitis serology, black pigment reaction associated glaucoma s/p topical Toxoplasma IgG, (predominantly with tattoo ink Baerveldt glaucoma corticosteroids, and CMP, CBC black tattoos on implants IOP-lowering drops arms, chest, and abdomen) 2 31yo WM OU(sc): 20/25; PHNI Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- ACE, lysozyme, Elevation/induration of Noncaseating OU: steroid-associated Topical corticosteroids, 17 months OU nongranulomatous B27, PPD, CMP, chest x-ray, CT skin tattooed with granulomatous ocular hypertension IOP-lowering drop recurrent anterior CBC chest, lymph black pigment reaction associated AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY uveitis node biopsyb (multicolored, with tattoo ink extensive tattoos on both arms) 3 32yo AAM OU(sc): 20/25-2; PHNI Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- ACE, chest x-ray Elevation/induration of Not performed OU: pupillary Methotrexate, oral 20 months OU nongranulomatous B27, Lyme serology, skin tattooed with mebranes, prednisone, topical chronic anterior CMP, CBC black pigment on cataracts, CME corticosteroids, uveitis both arms (black OD: posterior IOP-lowering drops tattoos on chest synechiae never involved) OS: iris bombe, uveitic glaucoma 4 23yo AAF OD(sc): 20/40, OS(sc): Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- Lysozyme, Elevation, induration, Not performed OU: posterior Mycophenolate mofetil, 7 months 20/200-2; PHNI OU nongranulomatous B27, Lyme serology, chest x-ray and scaling of synechiae, pupillary oral prednisone, chronic anterior CMP, CBC tattoos with black membranes, iris topical uveitis ink (multicolored bombe, severe CME corticosteroids, tattoos on face, OS: uveitic glaucoma IOP-lowering drops neck, torso, back, and all limbs) 5 23yo AAM OD(sc): 20/25, OS(sc): Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- ACE, chest x-ray Elevation/induration of Not performed OS: posterior Topical corticosteroids 4 months 20/20þ1; PHNI OU nongranulomatous B27, Lyme serology, skin tattooed with synechiae chronic anterior black pigment (black uveitis tattoos on arms/ chest) 6 21yo AAF OD(sc): 20/100, OS(sc): Bilateral RPR, FTA-ABS, HLA- ACE,b chest x-ray Elevation/induration of Not performed OU: severe optic nerve Oral prednisone, 2 months 20/40; PH 20/80 OD, nongranulomatous B27, PPD, Lyme skin tattooed with elevation and topical PHNI OS chronic panuveitis serology, Bartonella black pigment hyperemia with corticosteroids with hypopyon antibody panel, (multicolored tattoos papillomacular CMP, CBC on back) exudates, ERM OD: subfoveal RPE SEPTEMBER 2014 detachment Continued on next page
evaluation of a 1-week history of blurred vision, photo- phobia, and pain in both eyes. He had experienced similar 1 month (lost to Patient 2 underwent biopsy of an enlarged axillary lymph node, which displayed a noncaseating granulomatous reaction. Patient 6 had an elevated ACE value of 85 (reference range: 9–67 U/L). AAF ¼ African-American female; AAM ¼ African-American male; ACE ¼ serum angiotensin-converting enzyme; CBC ¼ complete blood count; CME ¼ cystoid macular edema; CMP ¼ complete G; IGRA ¼ interferon gamma release assay (QuantiFERON–TB Gold); IOP ¼ intraocular pressure; PH ¼ visual acuity measured with pinhole occluder; PHNI ¼ visual acuity measured with pinhole occluder offered no improvement in vision; PPD ¼ tuberculosis purified protein derivative skin testing; RPE ¼ retinal pigment epithelium; RPR ¼ syphilis rapid plasma regain; sc ¼ without correction; metabolic panel including liver function testing; CT ¼ computed tomography; ERM ¼ epiretinal membrane; FTA-ABS ¼ syphilis fluorescent treponemal antibody-absorption; IgG ¼ immunoglobulin Follow-up follow-up) Duration symptoms 6 months earlier, which lasted approximately 1 month before spontaneously resolving. Review of systems was notable for elevation and swelling of 8 tattoos on his immunosuppression arms and chest that occurred in conjunction with his ocular recommended symptoms on both occasions (Figure 1). All of his tattoos Treatment Oral prednisone; were performed during a 1-year period, approximately systemic 6 months prior to his initial ocular complaints. Upon presentation, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 20/100 in the right eye and 20/400 in the Ocular Complications retinal detachment left eye, with an intraocular pressure (IOP) of 11 mm Hg OD: neurosensory OS: severe CME in the right eye and 10 mm Hg in the left eye. Slit-lamp OU: posterior synechiae examination revealed diffuse conjunctival injection, dense mutton-fat keratic precipitates with overlying corneal microcystic edema, and posterior synechiae bilaterally. TABLE. Patient Demographics and Findings in Tattoo-Associated Uveitis (Continued ) Both eyes displayed anterior chamber inflammation of 3þ Tattoo Biopsy cells and 1þ flare, with 2þ anterior vitreous cells. Both Not performed optic nerves appeared hyperemic and edematous, but a more detailed posterior segment examination, including an assessment of vitreous haze, was limited by bilateral corneal edema and posterior synechiae. black pigment (arm) Elevation/induration of An initial evaluation, consisting of FTA-ABS, RPR, skin tattooed with Patient 7 had an elevated lysozyme value of 32 (reference range: 9–17 mg/mL) and a normal serum ACE value of 47. Tattoo Findings QuantiFERON-TB Gold, chest x-ray, and Lyme antibody, was unrevealing. He was initially treated with intensive topical corticosteroids and cycloplegic drops. Three days after presentation, BCVA improved to 20/50 in the right eye and 20/60 in the left eye, with an IOP of 20 mm Hg in the right eye and 22 mm Hg in the left eye. However, chest x-ray, CT Sarcoidosis Evaluationa ACE, lysozyme,b his intraocular inflammation persisted and high-dose (1 mg/kg/day) oral prednisone therapy was initiated. The chest bilateral anterior chamber inflammation and elevated tat- toos resolved over the course of 3 weeks; however, his IOP became elevated at this time (33 mm Hg in the right Uveitic Evaluationa FTA-ABS, HLA-B27, eye and 27 mm Hg in the left eye). Topical IOP-lowering CMP, CBC therapy was initiated in a stepwise manner, which escalated to maximal topical therapy. Topical prednisolone acetate All results unremarkable/negative unless otherwise indicated. 1% was changed to loteprednol etabonate 0.5% approxi- mately 8 weeks after presentation in an attempt to mini- nongranulomatous mize any steroid-response component; however, oral chronic anterior Inflammation Intraocular VA ¼ visual acuity; WM ¼ white male; yo ¼ year old. acetazolamide was necessary. A prolonged attempt to taper his oral prednisone led to a recurrence of intraocular uveitis Bilateral inflammation and tattoo elevation, and 3 months after his initial presentation he was referred for dermatologic 20/40; PHNI OD, PH OD(sc): 20/20, OS(sc): evaluation. His oral prednisone dose was tapered from 40 mg/day to 30 mg/day 6 days prior to this dermatology Initial VA appointment, and a biopsy was taken from an area of previ- OS 20/32 ously affected skin on his chest. Histologic sections of this biopsy displayed macrophages in clusters around the dermal superficial vascular plexus that contained tattoo pigment Patients Demographics with surrounding granulomatous inflammation. A repeat 42yo AAM chest x-ray, comprehensive chemistry panel, and serum ACE were ordered by dermatology, with all results inter- preted as normal. He then returned for routine follow-up b a nearly 3 weeks later on 20 mg/day of prednisone, at which 7 time he was noted to have diffuse elevation of all tattoos VOL. 158, NO. 3 TATTOO-ASSOCIATED UVEITIS 639
FIGURE 1. Tattoo inflammation in a 20-year-old African-American male subject with simultaneous bilateral, chronic, granulomatous panuveitis (Patient 1). (Upper left) Nodular elevation of focal areas of tattooed skin on the patient’s left shoulder. (Upper right) Diffuse elevation of black tattoos on the chest, with involvement of adjacent nontattooed skin. Hematoxylin-eosin stain (original magnifica- tion 3100) of biopsies from the chest and shoulder display a granulomatous reaction in the dermis with aggregates of epithelioid his- tiocytes, giant cells, and a sparse mononuclear infiltrate (Bottom left); all granulomas contained tattoo pigment (inset, Bottom right). containing black ink. Punch biopsies of the affected skin panuveitis. One patient with anterior uveitis had recurrent were taken from his left shoulder and chest. Histology slides disease, while all other patients had chronic uveitis. of these biopsy specimens revealed aggregates of epithelioid A medical examination was performed on all patients histiocytes and giant cells containing pigment particles and interpreted as unremarkable, with the exception of a with sparse mononuclear cell infiltrate (Figure 1). single elevated serum ACE (Patient 6) and lysozyme value Ultimately, his refractory ocular hypertension resulting (Patient 7). Patient 4 presented with submandibular and from a combination of uveitic and steroid response mecha- occipital lymphadenopathy not associated with overlying nisms required placement of glaucoma drainage devices tattooing, though she did have extensive head and neck 4 months and 6 months after presentation in the right tattoos. Patient 2 developed an enlarged left axillary lymph and left eye, respectively. The patient agreed to initiation node near the area of heavy tattooing on the same arm. of immunosuppressive therapy with mycophenolate mofe- All patients denied abnormal cutaneous reactions imme- til, which enabled successful tapering of oral prednisone. diately after tattooing, and all had their most recent tattoo At the most recent examination, 13 months after presenta- placed at least 6 months prior to the onset of cutaneous and tion, BCVA was 20/25 bilaterally with controlled IOP and intraocular symptoms. Five of the patients had extensive intraocular inflammation on mycophenolate mofetil 1.5 g tattoos, all of which consisted entirely of only black twice daily and prednisone 5 mg once daily. pigment or multicolored tattoos containing black ink. The remaining 2 patients had more limited tattooing (Patients 6 and 7). Only tattoos or portions of tattoos containing black pigment were affected in all 7 patients. RESULTS Involvement of the affected tattoos varied from focal SELECTED CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF ALL 7 PATIENTS nodular elevation in regions of black pigment to uniform are summarized in the Table. Six patients were African elevation and induration of all portions of the tattoo Americans, 4 of whom were male. The remaining patient containing black ink (Figure 2). In Patient 1, striking was a white man. The age range of all patients was 20–42 elevation and induration of the surrounding skin was also years at the time of presentation. Five patients presented observed. Five patients (Patient 1 and Patients 3–6) expe- with bilateral nongranulomatous anterior uveitis, while rienced at least 1 recurrence of intraocular inflammation the remaining 2 patients presented with granulomatous with simultaneous tattoo involvement. 640 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2014
DISCUSSION WE DESCRIBE A SERIES OF 7 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WHO demonstrated simultaneous onset of bilateral uveitis and tattoo elevation with induration. Five other cases published in 3 articles reported similar findings and no additional evidence of sarcoidosis on examination or chest imaging (chest x-ray and/or CT studies) at the time of pre- sentation.2,5,6 Similar to our series, these 5 patients exhibited bilateral uveitis, ranging from iridocyclitis to panuveitis. During observed follow-up, 1 patient developed ‘‘red infiltrates resembling erythema nodosum’’ on both shins that were not associated with tattooed skin.2 In our series, Patient 2 developed noncaseating granulomatous inflammation of an axillary lymph node adjacent to an area of dense tattooing, and Patient 3 developed subman- dibular and occipital lymphadenopathy, which was suspi- FIGURE 2. Tattoo elevation in a 23-year-old African- cious for sarcoidosis. Furthermore, there have been cases American female subject with simultaneous bilateral, chronic, reported in the literature of patients with a diagnosis of sys- nongranulomatous anterior uveitis (Patient 4). All areas of temic sarcoidosis at the time of presentation with bilateral her abdominal tattoo containing black pigment were raised and uveitis and tattoo induration.1,7,8 indurated, and similar tattoo involvement was noted on her Each of the patients in our series had extensive areas of head, neck, and back. tattooing that contained or consisted entirely of black ink. Other published reports describe skin inflammation associated with blue,2 red,5 and black ink.6–8 Tattoo size Tattoo biopsies were performed on Patients 1 and 2. A and color varied, although 1 case report described a tattoo biopsy on Patient 2 was performed 2 weeks prior patient with extensive black tattooing,6 which was similar to presentation and displayed noncaseating granulomas to the patients in our series. All of our patients received the composed of histiocytes surrounding black tattoo pigment majority of their tattoos over a relatively short period of in the dermis. His enlarged axillary lymph node also was time—approximately 1 year or less—but none experienced biopsied and displayed noncaseating granulomatous induration or inflammation of the tattoos at the time of inflammation. Similar findings were demonstrated in the tattoo placement. In the majority of reports, the inflamma- tattoo biopsies of Patient 1. Patients 4 and 5 were referred tion of tattooed skin coincided with the onset of uveitis for biopsy of their tattoos and enlarged lymph nodes (Pa- except for 2 of 3 patients reported by Rorsman and associ- tient 4) immediately after their initial evaluation, but ates, in whom tattoo inflammation occurred immediately both failed to follow up with dermatology and had rapid after placement and did not correlate temporally with their resolution of these findings following initiation of high- delayed ocular involvement.2 dose oral prednisone. The remaining patients (Patients 3, Of the 8 previously reported patients with tattoo- 6, and 7) were not sent for biopsy of their involved tattoos associated uveitis, 4 underwent complete excision of the because they were immediately treated with high-dose oral affected tattoo(s).2,5 Interestingly, 3 of these 4 patients prednisone, which coincided with rapid resolution of their were reported to have improvement in their intraocular tattoo findings over the course of approximately 1 week. inflammation following tattoo excision, with 2 achieving Owing to military service obligations requiring him to relo- complete resolution off of all medications. As with our cate, Patient 7 was lost to follow-up after 2 visits. series, the follow-up periods in these cases were limited, Five of 7 patients suffered potentially vision-threatening and it remains unclear whether tattoo excision had a role ocular complications at some point during observation. Pa- in disease resolution or simply coincided with spontaneous tients 3 and 4 presented with iris bombe, pupillary mem- disease remission. Unlike these previously reported cases, branes, and cystoid macular edema, which subsequently tattoo excision was not offered to the patients we continue required treatment with immunosuppressive therapy. to follow at our facility, as the percentage of body surface Patient 7 presented to our institution with a neurosensory area encompassed by their involved tattoos was deemed retinal detachment in the right eye and severe cystoid mac- too extensive for subsequent skin grafting. ular edema in the left eye. All patients treated with oral Various patterns of histologic reactions have been reported prednisone (Patients 1, 3, 4, 6, and 7) displayed simulta- to occur in tattooed skin, and one of the more common find- neous improvement in their ocular inflammation and reso- ings is granulomatous inflammation.9 Histologically, this can lution of their tattoo findings. be classified as a foreign body or sarcoid-type reaction, and the VOL. 158, NO. 3 TATTOO-ASSOCIATED UVEITIS 641
differentiation of these 2 types of granulomas may be both exposure in lung cell lines13 and mice14 have shown challenging and open to controversy.9,10 Allergic reactions that these particles ‘‘induce inflammation, oxidize to tattoo pigment can also occur, which may exhibit a DNA, cause DNA strand breaks and increase the mutant variety of histologic forms, some of which are also frequency following long-term exposure at a subcytotoxic consistent with sarcoidosis.9 Granulomatous reactions concentration.’’15 All of our patients received the major- confined to single tattoo colors typically represent a local ity of their tattoos over a relatively short period of hypersensitivity reaction to specific components of tattoo time—approximately 1 year or less—which may have pigment, but they may also represent a manifestation of conferred an increased risk of disease development as a systemic sarcoidosis.9 Interestingly, reports of allergic reac- result of the relatively large antigenic and/or toxic tions to black tattoo pigment are very rare.11 The histologic load. Interestingly, the US Food and Drug Administra- appearance of tattoo biopsy specimens obtained from 2 of tion has not approved any tattoo pigments for injection the 7 patients in our series were interpreted as noncaseating into the skin, and many pigments used in tattoo inks are granulomatous inflammation in association with dermal industrial-grade colors suitable for printers’ ink or auto- tattoo pigment, which is consistent with but not specific for mobile paint.16 Among adults 18–50 years of age in sarcoidosis. this country, the prevalence of tattoos may be as high Although the etiology of sarcoidosis remains unclear, it is as 24%.17 hypothesized that the disease process is initiated when a genet- Ultimately, the patients in our series seem to represent a ically susceptible host is exposed to an inciting environmental subset of patients in whom some component of tattoo antigen(s).3,10 In such an event, an exaggerated immune pigment initiated a localized cutaneous response that by response characterized by the activation of macrophages some means also played a role in the simultaneous develop- and CD4þ T lymphocytes occurs, resulting in cytokine ment of ocular inflammation. Whether the pathophysi- production consistent with a TH1-type immune response, ology of this process is similar to systemic sarcoidosis, is ultimately leading to granuloma formation.3,10 Considering the result of a hypersensitivity response, or is attributble the multiple environmental risk factors reported to date, it to some other mechanism is not yet known. Continued seems reasonable to conclude that the development of observation for the development of additional organ system sarcoidosis is likely the end result of immune responses to a involvement consistent with sarcoidosis, and the potential potentially large variety of environmental triggers.3,4 benefit of tattoo removal, if performed, may be useful The production of black tattoo ink is based on soot, knowledge. Altogether, the clinical presentation of the which may ‘‘contain toxic, mutagenic or carcinogenic patients collected for this series nearly equals the cumula- compounds such as carbon black and polycyclic aromatic tive number of previously reported cases, suggesting that hydrocarbons or phenol.’’12 Carbon black nanoparticle this association is likely underappreciated. ALL AUTHORS HAVE COMPLETED AND SUBMITTED THE ICMJE FORM FOR DISCLOSURE OF POTENTIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST. Jennifer E. Thorne discloses the following: grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland, USA), Research to Prevent Blindness Sybil B. Harrington Special Scholars Award (New York, New York, USA), Allergan (Irvine, California, USA); consultant for AbbVie (North Chicago, Illinois, USA), Gilead (Foster City, California, USA), Navigant (Chicago, Illinois, USA), Xoma (Berkeley, California, USA). The authors indicate no funding support. Contributions of authors: all listed authors made substantial contributions regarding (1) data acquisition (T.O., B.B., T.L., N.B., J.D., J.T.); (2) drafting (T.O.) or revising the article (T.O., B.B., T.L., N.B., J.D., J.T.); and (3) approval of submitted version (T.O., B.B., T.L., N.B., J.D., J.T.). Pathology consultation was provided by Gulsun Erdag, MD, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. REFERENCES 7. Anolik R, Mandal R, Franks A. Sarcoidal tattoo granu- loma. Dermatol Online J 2010;16(11):19. Available at, 1. Lubeck G, Epstein E. Complications of tattooing. Calif Med http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1fm1d840. Accessed May 1952;76(2):83–85. 6, 2014. 2. Rorsman H, Brehmer-Andersson E, Dahlquist I, et al. Tattoo 8. Post J, Hull P. Tattoo reactions as a sign of sarcoidosis. CMAJ granuloma and uveitis. Lancet 1969;294(7610):27–28. 2012;184(4):432. 3. Iannuzzi MC, Rybicki BA, Teirstein AS. Sarcoidosis. N Engl J 9. Morales-Callaghan AM, Aquilar-Bernier M, Martinez- Med 2007;357(21):2153–2165. Garcia G, Miranda-Romero A. Sarcoid granuloma on black 4. Bonfioli AA, Orefice F. Sarcoidosis. Semin Ophthalmol 2005; tattoo. J Am Acad Dermatol 2006;55(5 Suppl):S71–S73. 20(3):177–182. 10. Marcoval J, Mana J, Moreno A, Gallego I, Fortuno Y, Peyri J. 5. Barbarasi Z, Kiss E, Balaton G, Vajo Z. Cutaneous granuloma Foreign bodies in granulomatous cutaneous lesions of patients and uveitis caused by a tattoo. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2008; with systemic sarcoidosis. Arch Dermatol 2001;137(4): 120(1-2):18. 427–430. 6. Saliba N, Owen ME, Beare N. Tattoo-associated uveitis. Eye 11. Kaur RR, Kirby W, Maibach H. Cutaneous allergic reactions 2010;24(8):1406. to tattoo ink. J Cosmet Dermatol 2009;8(4):295–300. 642 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2014
12. Wenzel SM, Rittmann I, Landthaler M, Baumler W. Adverse 15. Hogsberg T, Jacobsen NR, Clausen PA, Serup J. Black tattoo reactions after tattooing: review of the literature and com- inks induce reactive oxygen species production correlating parison to results of a survey. Dermatology 2013;226(2): with aggregation of pigment nanoparticles and product brand 138–147. but not with the polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon content. 13. Jacobsen NR, Saber AT, White P, et al. Increased mutant fre- Exp Dermatol 2013;22(7):464–469. quency by carbon black, but not quartz, in the lacZ and cll 16. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Consumer Health Informa- transgenes of muta mouse lung epithelial cells. Environ Mol tion. Think before you ink: are tattoos safe? Available at, http:// Mutagen 2007;48(6):451–461. www.fda.gov/forconsumers/consumerupdates/ucm048919.htm. 14. Jacobsen NR, Moller P, Jensen KA, et al. Lung inflamma- Accessed May 6, 2014. tion and genotoxicity following pulmonary exposure 17. Laumann AE, Derick AJ. Tattoos and body piercings in the to nanoparticles in ApoE-/- mice. Part Fibre Toxicol United States: a national data set. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009;6:2. 2006;55(3):413–421. VOL. 158, NO. 3 TATTOO-ASSOCIATED UVEITIS 643
Biosketch Trucian Ostheimer, MD, graduated from the Ohio State University College of Medicine in 2008, and completed his ophthalmology residency at the Illinois Eye & Ear Infirmary in 2012. He is currently completing a two-year ocular immunology fellowship at the Wilmer Eye Institute, and has a special interest in birdshot chorioretinopathy. Dr Ostheimer will begin a fellowship in vitreoretinal surgery at the University of Washington in July, 2014. 643.e1 AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY SEPTEMBER 2014
You can also read