Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University

Page created by Shirley Rowe
 
CONTINUE READING
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments
         for Body Contouring

                          Jayne Joo, MD
Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
                           of California, Davis
  Director of Mohs micrographic surgery, Sacramento VA Medical Center
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Disclosure

I have no relevant relationship with industry.
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Fat is big business
§ United states is the most obese country in the world (35.3% of the
  population age 15+)
   ú   Source: OECD Health Statistics 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/health-data-en.

§ According to the American Society of Dermatologic Surgery 88% of
  Americans report feeling bothered by excess weight on their bodies
§ Improvement in psychosocial function, self-esteem, body image and
  quality of life after aesthetic surgery
§ Demand for noninvasive forms of body contouring is increasing
   ú Minimally invasive procedures increased by 137% from 2000 to 2012
     in US
   ú Liposuction has declined from 350,000 (2000) to 198,000 (2009)
§ In 2015, the global market for body shaping platforms and disposables
  reached over $1 billion (Medical Insight Inc. “Energy Based Body
  Shaping/Skin Tightening.” Medical Insight, Inc. 2016.)
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Body contouring after massive weight loss

Maia M, Costa Santos D. Body Contouring After Massive Weight Loss: A Personal Integrated Approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017 May 31.
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Non-invasive: the future of fat removal?
§ Surgical body-shaping procedures down by 14% in 2012
§ Advantages:
  ú Lower risk
  ú Fewer complications
  ú Less aftercare
  ú Faster treatment/healing time
  ú Less pain
  ú No need for anesthesia

§ Disadvantage:
  ú Tend to require multiple sessions
  ú Subtler results
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Ideal treatment
§ Safe
§ Painless
§ No downtime
§ Fast
§ Effective in 1 or few treatments
§ One size fits all
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Non-invasive technologies
§ Cryolipolysis
§ Radiofrequency
§ Laser-based
§ Light-based
§ Ultrasound
§ Injection lipolysis
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Cryolipolysis
§ “Freeze fat”
§ Based upon concept of popsicle panniculitis
§ Controlled cooling of adipose tissue to
  induce adipocyte apoptosis
§ Reduces fat content by ~20-26% at
  treatment site
§ No downtime
Surgical and Non-invasive Treatments for Body Contouring - Jayne Joo, MD Director of Cosmetic Dermatology, Department of Dermatology, University
Coolsculpting (Zeltiq)
§ FDA approved
§ Suction draws in target tissue into cup-shaped applicators

                                            CoolAdvantage™
                                           with interchangeable contours

§   Tissue is drawn into handpiece under vacuum
§   Treatment duration: 45 to 60 mins
§   # treatment cycles depends on area
§   1 to 3 treatments spaced 8 weeks apart
Adverse effects
§ Pain
§ Bruising
§ Erythema
§ Numbness
§ Dysesthesia
Coolsculpting
Before               After
Coolsculpting
Before               After
Long Lasting Results
             Baseline                        2 months                             2 years                             6 years

              Baseline                        3 months                              5 years                             9 years

Bernstein EF. Long-term efficacy follow-up on two cryolipolysis case studies: 6 and 9 years post-treatment. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Dec;15(4):
561-564.
Submental Contouring

Kilmer SL, Burns AJ, Zelickson BD.. Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis for Non-Invasive Reduction of Submental Fat. Lasers Surg Med. 2016
Jan; 48(1):3-13.
Submental Contouring with Cryolipolysis

        Before              12 Week Follow-up
                          2 CoolSculpting Treatments
                       Procedure by Brian Zelickson, MD
                                  (-4.5 lbs)
Weight
                                                                                                                 change, 0.05
                                                                                                                 kg (0.1 lb)
                                                                                                                 (0.05%) from
                                                                                                                 baseline.
                                     2 treatment cycles per visit to the lateral and
                                     central submental areas, 2 treatments spaced
                                     6 weeks apart

Bernstein EF, Bloom JD. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and
Skin Tightening. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Apr 20.
Paradoxical adipose hypertrophy
          § Rare, 1:20,000
          § Incidence 0.0051%
          § More common in males
          § Pathogenesis unknown
          § No single, common characteristic has been
            identified among affected individuals
          § Onset 2 to 3 months after treatment
          § Does not spontaneously resolve

Jalian HR, Avram MM, Garibyan L, Mihm MC, Anderson RR. Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After Cryolipolysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 March ;
150(3): 317–319
High intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU)
§ Generates high-energy acoustic waves (100 to
  10,000 W/cm2) that converge at a specific focal
  point in adipose tissue
§ Rapidly raises the temperature (to >65°C)
  around adipose tissue and causes coagulative
  necrosis
§ Focal point depth of 1.3 cm
§ Allows localized destruction of adipose tissue
  at precise tissue depths without damage to
  skin surface or surrounding tissue
Liposonix (Solta)
§ “1 hour, 1 treatment, 1 inch”
§ Contraindicated in patients with < 1 cm of
  adipose tissue beyond the focal treatment
  depth
§ Liposonix creates a temperature rise above
  56°C effectively destroying the targeted
  adipose tissue without damaging tissue
  outside of the intended focal zone.
§ Macrophages are attracted to treated
  adipose tissue, engulfing free lipids and
  cellular debris.
§ Destroyed cells are naturally processed by
  the body and excreted gradually over 8-12
  weeks.
Transducer focuses ultrasonic waves
                 that converge at a specific depth

Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS. Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthetic
Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):901-12.
Gross pathology demonstrating
                   coagulative necrosis and eventual
                     resorption of treatment zone

Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS. Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthetic
Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):901-12.
Histology showing adipocyte disruption

Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS. Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthetic
Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):901-12.
Safety, Tolerability, and Efficacy of HIFU
                                                         § Sham-controlled trial, randomized trial
                                                         § 168 patients, ages 18 to 65 years, BMI ≤
                                                              30 kg/m2
                                                         §    Baseline waist circumference change at
                                                              12 weeks post-tx: -2.52 cm (higher
                                                              energy) vs -2.10 cm (lower energy) vs
                                                              -1.21 cm (sham)
                                                         §    47.5% “satisfied” to “very satisfied” with
                                                              treatment results
                                                         §    51.7 to 53.4% “likely” or “very likely” to
                                                              pursue additional treatment
                                                         §    Adverse effects: mild to moderate
                                                              discomfort, bruising and edema
                                                         §    Less discomfort at lower energy levels
Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, Kane MA, Weiss RA, Martin P, Schlessinger J. Randomized sham-controlled
trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2011 Jul;128(1):253-62.
Baseline                        Post treatment                         Baseline                  Post treatment

                             Decrease of 2.55 cm from baseline wait circumference

Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, Kane MA, Weiss RA, Martin P, Schlessinger J. Randomized sham-controlled
trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg.
2011 Jul;128(1):253-62.
VASER Liposuction
§ Vibration Amplification of Sound Energy at Resonance
§ Targets unwanted fat using ultrasonic technology
     whilst preserving important tissues such as nerves,
     blood vessels and collagen and helps with particularly
     stubborn areas that will not shift through diet or
     exercise and can improve overall shape.
§   Small probe inserted which is used to transmit sound
     energy and liquefy fat cells prior to removal through a
     suction process
§   Single treatment
§   Improves overall shape and body contour
§   Manual lymphatic drainage (massage to stimulate
     lymphatic system) is recommended to encourage of
     lymph fluid which helps with recovery and results
Velashape
§ Syneron-Candela
§ Realself worth it rating 57%
§ For treating cellulite and reducing body
  circumference
§ Typically requires 3 treatment session
§ Combines infrared light, bipolar radiofrequency
  energy, vacuum and massage, which cause
  heating of fat cells and surrounding connective
  tissue/dermal collagen.
Ultrashape (Syneron-Candela)
§ The UltraShape Power system works by
  emitting acoustic waves of focused ultrasonic
  energy (200 ± 30 KHz frequency) that converge
  into a confined focal volume underneath the
  skin, thereby, targeting only subcutaneous fat
  at a controlled depth. Unlike traditional
  ultrasound technology, UltraShape Power’s
  energy transmits pulsed ultrasound, allowing
  control over temperature elevation.
§ 3 treatments, 2 weeks apart
Ultrashape
Photos: Ruthie Amir, MD
Photos: Eun Hee Kang, MD
Radiofrequency (RF)
§   Used for skin tightening >> fat/cellulite reduction
§   Causes thermal injury using electrical energy
§   Passing of energy creates heating
§   Monopolar vs multipolar
§   Monopolar RF:
    ú Energy is passed from single electrode into the tissues
      and directed to a return pad
§ Multipolar RF:
    ú Two or more electrodes within the same handpiece are
      positioned at different points on the skin so that the
      waves pass between them to create a heating effect.
Radiofrequency
§.
EndyMed 3Deep
§ For body contouring and cellulite reduction
§ Multisource RF technology that delivers controlled,
  focused RF energy deep into the skin
§ Uses an array of several electrodes and a sophisticated
  algorithm that manipulates the phase of current
  flowing between each pair of electrodes. The multiple
  electrical fields created repel each other, leading to
  the ideal combination of energy directed to a deeper
  skin layer. The repelling forces between adjacent
  electromagnetic fields drive energy vertically into the
  target tissue, reducing the amount of energy flowing
  through skin surface and alleviating the need for
  cooling.
Venus Freeze
§ Venus Freeze is an FDA-approved, non-invasive
  treatment for cellulite and loose skin on the
  face, neck, and body.
§ Uses radio frequency and magnetic pulses to
  stimulate the generation of new collagen and
  elastin fibers over time. There is
  a recommended six sessions for the face/neck
  and eight to 10 for the body).
Inmode BodyFX
§ Radio-Frequency provides precise and optimal
  heating of the skin for reduction, contraction
  and body shaping
§ Negative Pressure Massage applies gentle
  vacuum pressure allowing for maximal depth
  treatment
§ Clinical studies show 30% adipocyte (fat cell)
  apoptosis at a 2.5 cm depth and new collagen
  synthesis (neocollagenesis) of 13.7%
BodyFX
BTL Vanquish
§ Uses patented Selective RF technology to
  cause selective healing of adipose tissue,
  leading to adipocyte shrinkage and elimination
§ No BMI limit
§ Contactless (hovers)
BTL Exilis
§ Combines RF and ultrasound to tighten skin
BTL Cellutone
§ For cellulite reduction and skin texture improvement
§ Can be used to enhance postop recovery after
  liposuction
§ Uses targeted high frequency mechanical vibrations
§ Enhance microcirculation and oxygen supply in
  affected area resulting in increased blood supply and
  removal of excess interstitial fluid.
Low level laser therapy (LLLT)
§ Non-thermal ablation of adipocytes
§ Primary phase: absorption of red and near infrared light
   ú Red diode laser 635 nm
   ú Green diode laser 532 nm
§ Secondary phase: biological cascade
§ LLLT excites cytochrome c oxidase (photoreceptor target),
  which upregulates ATP synthesis à activates transcription
  factors/gene expression à alters permeability of adipocytes
§ May adversely affect lipid profile and have effect on endocrine
  system and metabolism
§ Requires multiple treatments
§ Results are modest at best
SculpSure
§ Diode laser
§ Hyperthermic: 42 to 47C
§ Active cooling epidermis and dermis to protect skin
§ 1060 nm diode, large spot size for treatment
§ FAST: 25 minutes treatment cycles
§ Non-suction
§ 4 treatment areas simultaneously
§ FDA Cleared: Abdomen and Flank
§ Side effects: Induration. No PAH seen
§ On market almost one year
§ Results seen in 6 to 12 weeks
1060 nm Diode Heating of Fat

                         Rise in temperature from baseline
                      +4°C

                        +8°C       +12°C                 2.5 cm

                               Fat destruction zone
                               Feathering of heat
                               Baseline
Sculpsure Treatment Results

                                         Courtesy of B. Katz, MD
   FLANK TREATMENT
   SIDE VIEW
   Areas 1 and 2 treated on both flanks
Zerona (Erchonia Medical)
§ Low level diode laser with
  multiple heads
§ Uses low level laser
  therapy at 635 nm which
  promotes liberation of
  stored intracellular fat
§ Laser liberated fatty debris
  is thought to be
  eliminated from the
  treated area via
  lymphatics
§ Double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
    § 67 volunteers, ages 18-65, BMI 25-30 kg/m2
    § 3 treatments/week x 2 weeks

Jackson RF, Dedo DD, Roche GC, Turok DI, Maloney RJ. Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for body contouring: a randomized,
controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Dec;41(10):799-809.
Jackson RF, Dedo DD, Roche GC, Turok DI, Maloney RJ. Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for body contouring: a randomized,
controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Dec;41(10):799-809.
Injection lipolysis
§ Injection of fat reducing substance to localized
  areas of adiposity
KYBELLA™ (Allergan)
          § Nonhuman nonanimal formulation of
            deoxycholic acid
          § Deoxycholic acid is an endogenous
            secondary bile acid that normally solubilizes
            dietary fat, contributing to its breakdown
            and absorption within the gut
          § Cytolytic agent
          § Causes destruction of adipocytes
          § Once the aesthetic response is achieved, re-
            treatment is not expected.
Georgesen C, Lipner SR. The development, evidence, and current use of ATX-101 for the treatment of submental fat. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2017
Apr 21.
KYBELLA™
 § First and only FDA-approved
     injectable drug that contours and
     improves the appearance of
     submental fullness associated
     with fat
 §   KYBELLA™ 10 mg/mL is supplied
     in 2 mL, single patient use vials (4
     pack)
 §   Store at room temperature 20°C
     to 25°C (68°F to 77°F)
 §   Each vial is for a single patient use
 §   Do not dilute or admix KYBELLA™
Dosing and administration
§ 0.2 mL injections spaced 1 cm apart until all
  sites in the planned treatment area have been
  injected
§ Up to 50 injections or 10 mL may be injected in
  a single treatment
§ Up to 6 single treatments may be administered
  at intervals no less than 1 month apart
Treatment area landmarks
Pre-Platysmal Fat
Poor candidates
§ Excessive skin laxity
§ Marked superficial wrinkling
§ Loose skin adherence
§ Redundant skin
§ Prominent platysmal bands
§ Too much submental fullness
Common adverse reactions
§ Edema/swelling
§ Hematoma/bruising
§ Pain
§ Numbness
§ Erythema
§ Induration
Precautions
§ Marginal mandibular nerve injury
§ Difficulty swallowing (dysphagia)
§ Injection site hematoma/bruising
§ Do not inject into or near (within 1 to 1.5 cm)
  salivary glands, lymph nodes and muscles
Kybella
Combining modalities
Male Body Contouring
Post-pregnancy body
Lipedema
How to pick the right body contouring
          for your practice
§ Patient demographics
§ Clinic size/space
§ Staff
  ú Resource intensive?
§ Budget
  ú Capitol cost of device
  ú Cost of consumables
§ Treatment protocol
When purchasing a device
1. Do your due diligence
   ú Attend meetings
   ú Speak to others who have device
2. Don’t fall for before/after marketing photos
3. Ask for evidence from clinical trials
   ú FDA clearance?
4. Try before you buy
   ú Ask for loan period
5. Be careful of cheap no-name devices, especially
   unproven devices from unknown manufacturers
   ú Ask about warranty/service
   ú Manufacturer support
   ú Continuous training
Preparation
§ Marketing plan
§ Price strategy
§ Information brochures
§ Posters
§ Before and after photos
Realself worth it ratings

§   Coolsculpting 81%     §   Sculpsure 73%
§   Liposonix 67%         §   Cellulaze 62%
§   Laser lipo 84%        §   Kybella 80%
§   Bodytite 71%          §   Vaser Lipo 91%
                          §   Velashape 57%
                          §   Ultrashape 85%
                          §   Zerona 70%
                          §   BTL Vanquish 70%
                          §   Endymed 56%
                          §   Venus Freeze 28%
Liposuction
§ Gold standard for body contouring
§ Expensive and invasive
§ More downtime
§ Less sought by most patients
§ Newer technologies:
  ú Ultra-sound assisted
  ú Power-assisted
  ú Laser-assisted
  ú Radiofrequency-assisted
Complications
§ Abnormal body contour
§ Nerve damage
§ Fibrosis
§ Perforations
§ Seroma
§ Fat embolism
§ Deep vein thrombosis
§ Pulmonary embolism
Liposuction
Submental liposuction
Klein’s recipe for tumescent anesthesia
          § Lidocaine
                ú 500 mg (50 ml of 1% lidocaine solution)
          § Epinephrine
                ú 1 mg (1 ml 1:1,000 epi solution)
          § Sodium bicarbonate
                ú 12.5 mEq (12.5 ml of 8.4% NaH2CO3 solution)
          § Normal saline
                ú 1,000 ml of 0.9% NaCl solution

                     Lidocaine 0.05%, Epinephrine 1:1,000,000

Klein JA. The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. 1990 Jul;8(3):425-37.
Benefits of tumescent technique
§ Minimizes risks of postop irregularities/distortions of
    the skin
§   Decreases surgical risk
§   Minimizes fluid shift
§   Decreases blood loss (12 ml whole blood per liter of fat
    extracted)
§   Decreases anesthetic risk (lidocaine toxicity)
    ú Maximal safe dose of lidocaine for liposuction: 45 mg/kg
§ Peak plasma lidocaine levels occur 12 hours after initial
  injection
§ Local anesthesia persists for up to 18 hours
Laser-assisted liposuction
§ Variation on traditional liposuction
§ Involves fiberoptic delivery of laser energy to
    target tissues
§   Laser energy liquefies fat before removal
    through a cannula
§   Makes fat easier to remove
§   Less aggressive/traumatic
§   May offer faster recovery timeline
Cellulaze (Cynosure)
§ Uses 1440 nm laser with side-firing fiber
  inserted subcutaneously to thermally subcise
  fibrous septae
Smart Lipo/Laser Lipo
BodyTite™ (Invasix Ltd, Israel)
          § Radiofrequency-assisted liposuction
          § Uses bipolar device to deliver radiofrequency
            energy that is converted into heat which melts
            fat, making it easier to remove
          § Also improves hemostasis and skin tightening
          § Need to be cautious of cannula tip location
          § Complication rate 14.6%
                ú infection, seroma, burn, medication reaction

Theodorou SJ, Paresi RJ, Chia CT. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction Device for Body Contouring: 97 Patients under Local Anesthesia. Aesth
Plast Surg (2012) 36:767–779
BodyTite

Theodorou SJ, Paresi RJ, Chia CT. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction Device for Body Contouring: 97 Patients under Local Anesthesia. Aesth
Plast Surg (2012) 36:767–779
BodyTite

                                         82-85% patient satisfaction
                                         89% would recommend procedure
                                         58.% had good to excellent skin tightening
                                         Majority reported minimal to no discomfort

Theodorou SJ, Paresi RJ, Chia CT. Radiofrequency-Assisted Liposuction Device for Body Contouring: 97 Patients under Local Anesthesia. Aesth
Plast Surg (2012) 36:767–779
Liposculpture
§ Liposuction that involves removing or leaving
  fat in specific areas to create the appearance of
  muscle definition
§ Creates illusion of abdominal 6-pack by leaving
  behind small amounts of fat to mimic muscle
  fullness (“abdominal etching”)
Cellfina
§ Uses subcision
Cellfina
Abdominoplasty

Pre                    Post
Abdominoplasty
Abdominoplasty
Patient selection
§ Thorough history (diet and exercise)
§ Reason for seeking treatment
§ Expectations
§ Weed out patients with BDD
§ BMI < 30

             Underpromise, overdeliver
Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD)
§ Characterized by a distressing and obsessive
  preoccupation with an imagined or slight
  defect in appearance
§ Associated with significant distress, disability
  (including social isolation and occupational
  dysfunction), cosmetic surgery and suicidality
§ Prevalence in general population: 1.7 – 2.4%
§ Prevalence in dermatology settings: 8.8-14%
Body dysmorphic disorder
                              questionnaire (BDDQ)
         § Validated, self screening questionnaire
         § Derived from DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for
           BDD
         § Modified from version used in psychiatric
           setting
         § Highly effective screening tool in cosmetic
           dermatology setting
               ú 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity

Dufresne RG, Phillips KA, Vittorio CC, Wilkel CS. A screening questionnaire for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic dermatologic surgery
practice. Dermatol Surg. 2001 May;27(5):457-62.
Sample questions to screen for BDD
§ Are you very concerned about the appearance
  of some part of your body, which you consider
  especially unattractive? Y or N
§ Do you think about these concerns a lot and
  find it hard to stop thinking about them? Y or N
§ How much has your defect caused you distress,
  torment or pain? 1 to 5 (1 = none, 5 = extreme)
§ How much has your defect caused impairment
  in social, occupational or other important areas
  of functioning? 1 to 5 (1 = none, 5 = extreme)
Summary
§ Non-invasive or minimally invasive alternative
  to liposuction
References
§   Song AY, Rubin JP, Thomas V, Dudas JR, Marra KG, Fernstrom MH. Body image and quality of life in post massive
    weight loss body contouring patients. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2006 Sep;14(9):1626-36.
§   Klassen A, Jenkinson C, Fitzpatrick R, Goodacre T. Patients' health related quality of life before and after aesthetic
    surgery. Br J Plast Surg. 1996 Oct;49(7):433-8.
§   Maia M, Costa Santos D. Body Contouring After Massive Weight Loss: A Personal Integrated Approach. Aesthetic Plast
    Surg. 2017 May 31.
§   Dufresne RG, Phillips KA, Vittorio CC, Wilkel CS. A screening questionnaire for body dysmorphic disorder in a cosmetic
    dermatologic surgery practice. Dermatol Surg. 2001 May;27(5):457-62.
§   https://aestheticsjournal.com/hub/Body%20Contouring
§   Klein JA. The tumescent technique. Anesthesia and modified liposuction technique. Dermatol Clin. 1990 Jul;8(3):425-37.
§   Jewell ML, Baxter RA, Cox SE, Donofrio LM, Dover JS, Glogau RG, Kane MA, Weiss RA, Martin P, Schlessinger
    J. Randomized sham-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a high-intensity focused
    ultrasound device for noninvasive body sculpting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Jul;128(1):253-62.
§   Jewell ML, Solish NJ, Desilets CS. Noninvasive body sculpting technologies with an emphasis on high-
    intensity focused ultrasound. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2011 Oct;35(5):901-12.
§   Avram MM, Harry RS (2009) Cryolipolysis for subcutaneous fat layer reduction. Lasers Surg Med 41:703–708
§   Kilmer SL, Burns AJ, Zelickson BD.. Safety and Efficacy of Cryolipolysis for Non-Invasive Reduction of
    Submental Fat. Lasers Surg Med. 2016 Jan; 48(1):3-13.
§   Bernstein EF, Bloom JD. Safety and Efficacy of Bilateral Submental Cryolipolysis With Quantified 3-
    Dimensional Imaging of Fat Reduction and Skin Tightening. JAMA Facial Plast Surg. 2017 Apr 20.
§   Jalian HR, Avram MM, Garibyan L, Mihm MC, Anderson RR. Paradoxical Adipose Hyperplasia After
    Cryolipolysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 March ; 150(3): 317–319
§   Jackson RF, Dedo DD, Roche GC, Turok DI, Maloney RJ. Low-level laser therapy as a non-invasive approach for
    body contouring: a randomized, controlled study. Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Dec;41(10):799-809.
References cont’
§ Georgesen C, Lipner SR. The development,
 evidence, and current use of ATX-101 for the
 treatment of submental fat. J Cosmet
 Dermatol. 2017 Apr 21.
You can also read