Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020

Page created by Mark Jacobs
 
CONTINUE READING
Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020
Suggestions for
the Government of India
    by JCCII 2020
Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020
Table of Contents
Segment 1 Infrastructure (Roadways, Ports) .......................................................... 3

  Suggestion No.1-1: Construction of the new Haryana-UP link road that bypasses
  Delhi .............................................................................................................. 3

  Suggestion No.1-2: Progress of NH8 linking Gurgaon-Manesar-Bawar-Neemrana..... 8

  Suggestion No.1-3: Work on related roadway works in the runup to the CBIC
  (Chennai Bangalore Industrial Corridor) implementation ......................................12

  Suggestion No.1-4: Work on roadways around Chennai area ................................17

  Suggestion No.1-5:Work on roadways around Bangalore area ..............................19

  Suggestion No.1-6:Upgrade of Kamarajar Port ...................................................21

Segment 2 TAX System ......................................................................................24

  Suggestion No.2-1:Consumption stimulus measures/Unilateral import tariff changes
  ....................................................................................................................24

  Suggestion No.2-2:Reduction of corporate tax rate for foreign branches ................26

  Suggestion No.2-3:Tariff on TV Open Cells etc… .................................................27

Segment 3 Government Response .......................................................................29

  Suggestion No.3-1:Clarification of e-commerce site management standards for
  foreign companies...........................................................................................29

  Suggestion No.3-2:Simplification of the exemption application for repeat use
  materials .......................................................................................................31

  Suggestion No.3-3:Flexible implementation timeline for mandatory standards
  amidst the pandemic environment ....................................................................33

  Suggestion No.3-4: GST exemption on medicines ...............................................35

  Suggestion No.3-5:Clarification and proper documentation of India's post-marketing
  commitments .................................................................................................37

  Suggestion No.3-6: Implementation of Proper plastic regulations .........................39

  Suggestion No.3-7:Implementation of proper e-waste management regulations .....41

  Suggestion No.3-8: Clarification of labeling provisions in accordance with the Legal
  Metrology Law ................................................................................................43

                                                                                                                      1
Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020
Suggestion No.3-9:Relaxation in bidding qualifications (commercial and technical) for
  power cable bidders ........................................................................................45

  Suggestion No.3-10:Expediting permits and procedures (Still waiting for subsidy
  refund from MH govt) ......................................................................................48

  Suggestion No.3-11:Expediting court proceedings in Indian courts........................50

  Suggestion No.3-12:Eradication of harassment by senior officials of relevant
  ministries and agencies. ..................................................................................51

Segment 4 Baking Sector (Finacial System) ..........................................................52

  Suggestion No.4-1:Relaxation of PSL (Priority Sector Lending) regulations .............52

  Suggestion No.4-2:Elimination of the Non-Objection-Certificate (NOC) requirement 53

  Suggestion No.4-3:Request regarding revision of calculation of credit to a single
  company under the Single Borrower Limits ........................................................55

  Suggestion No.4-4:Licensing requirements by CCIL from the FSA for OTC derivatives
  clearing transactions .......................................................................................57

  Suggestion No.4-5:Removal of the monetary limit on borrowings from the head office
  of foreign bank ...............................................................................................59

  Suggestion No.4-6: Shortening of the Minimum Average Maturity (MAM) of external
  commercial banking (ECB) borrowing from the parent company ...........................60

Segment 5 IPR ..................................................................................................62

  Suggestion No.5-1:Proper examination of the establishment of trademark rights etc…
   ....................................................................................................................62

  Suggestion No.5-2:Removal of the obligation to submit foreign application etc….....66

  Suggestion No.5-3:Administrative guidance to e-commerce website operators in
  India .............................................................................................................69

Segment 6 Regulation ........................................................................................71

  Suggestion 6-1:Lifting the ban on group corporate finance in India along with the
  abolition of deemed dividends ..........................................................................71

                                                                                                                       2
Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020
Segment 1 Infrastructure (Roadways, Ports)

Suggestion No.1-1: Construction of the new Haryana-UP link road that
bypasses Delhi

  Company:DENSO INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD

  1. Subject of proposed submission
     Please expedite the remaining connectivity gaps by interchange of EPE(East
     Peripheral Expressway) and Yamuna Expressway. This refers to the construction
     of the new arterial road between Haryana and UP, bypassing Delhi.

  2. Submission proposed to:
     PMO, NHAI, YEIDA

  3. Key Issue/background
     In recent years, industrial activity has grown exponentially in Haryana (esp.
     Gurgaon, Manesar), Rajasthan (Neemrana) and UP (Greater Noida). As a result
     there has been an equivalent surge in logistics cargo volumes between Haryana
     and UP. EPE and WPE are appreciated by all citizens of the area. Final point is to
     keep connectivity of EPE and Yamuna Expressway by Interchange, not only for
     Industry and convenience but also the defense and security for National Security
     Guard to work on road.

  4. How this proposal benefits India
     Will enhance the competitiveness of industry in the Haryana and UP by way of
     reducing transportation distance and time.
     Will reduce the security risk in core areas with direct connectivity of NH8 – EPE –
     Yamuna Expressway by interchange.

  5. Comparable global standards/best practices
     In ASEAN, especially, in Thailand, there is a ring road which completely bypasses
     Bangkok, and all important road connectivity is kept through Interchanges.

  6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
     The remaining point is connection with Interchange of EPE and Yamuna
     Expressway. Even though Tender floating process has started on 14 June, 2019,

                                                                                       3
Suggestions for the Government of India by JCCII 2020
the construction of interchange has not started yet. This Interchange connectivity
issue has been acknowledged even by the PMO and they requested NHAI to
proceed speedily. DPIIT’s support is also appreciated.

NHAI replied to PMO on 16 June 2020, that “monitoring committee, consulted by
Supreme Court of India to review the progress of construction of EPE, in its 29th
Meeting, decided that the interchange on Yamuna Expressway will be constructed
by Yamuna Expressway Industrial Department Authority (YEIDA) through e-
tendering to connect EPE and Yamuna Expressway. Accordingly YEIDA has taken
up the work and awarded the project work to M/s Devv Yash Project and
Infrastructure PVT LTD through e-tendering.

[Supplemental data]

(1)   My write to PMO

Honorable Prime Minister

1) My brief profile

I am Nobuhiro Takahashi, Managing Executive Officer of DENSO International
India Pvt. Ltd. DENSO group has a history of more than 30 years in India. We
really appreciate the Indian Central Government’s vision for expansion of
business in India and the vision of the developing infrastructure as the symbol of

                                                                                 4
New India. I live in Gurgaon continuing the fight with new virus with our
members.

2) My small observation, as one of non-immigrant citizen staying in Delhi NCR,
since last 13 years, is as follows:

One of agenda of another 5 years to come for India is also the expansion of the
Indian economy size or Indian Domestic Market Value to realize new India
through Infrastructure development etc.,

My small understanding of Road Infrastructure is, that the Road Infrastructure is
not only for convenience of citizens and efficiency of economic activities to seek
for the independency of economy without depending on some specific country
like China Communist Party, but the Road Infrastructure is the important
infrastructure for the defense and security. Without appropriate road
infrastructure, how National Security Guard can send troop on road to the
required place. I was in India when the Radical Islamic Terrorist attack
happened at Mumbai in year 2008.

In the view of the defense and security, the connectivity of Road / Highway is
required to implement. All Highway is required to keep connectivity, for National
Security Guard to send troop immediately towards the require venue on road,
not only by air, like helicopter.

Now New Airport Project, like Jewar Airport, is available. Many Citizens in past
requested UP State to realize the connection of EPE and Yamuna Expressway
with Interchange sooner. However the process of vender selection had stopped
for a long time.

Without the connectivity of Yamuna Express Way, EPE and NH8, how National
Security Guard works by Road Transportation to send troop to the Jewar Airport,
in case of Radical Islamic Terrorist attack.

UP State might not learn anything from the very sad historical incident
happened in year 2008.

It might be required for Central Government to focus on / emphasize the
connectivity of each highway project and the existing highway with each others.

                                                                                     5
3)Finally, the strong intention of the Central Government to make India better,
will break through any obstacle to realize the new India for India’s Future
Prosperity

                                                                          (Finish)

(2)   The Reply from PMO and NHAI

                                                                                  6
(3)   News Paper Article URL

14July2020

Delayed Interchange on Yamuna E-way: Moved by a Japanese executive,
PMO intervenes; Asks NHAI to clarify

https://www.asiancommunitynews.com/delayed-interchange-on-
yamuna-e-way-moved-by-a-japanese-executive-pmo-intervenes-asks-
nhai-to-clarify/

                                                                  7
Suggestion No.1-2: Progress of NH8 linking Gurgaon-Manesar-Bawar-
  Neemrana

  Company:DENSO INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT LTD

1. Subject of proposed submission
  Road construction of NH8 (esp. Gurgaon - Manesar - Bawal - Neemrana) should
  be expedited at the earliest i.e. enhancement of facilities for drainage and
  construction of pedestrian crossing bridges and flyover etc.. Especially Flyovers at
  Bilaspur and Kapdiwas are required to be completed on priority.

2. Submission proposed to:
  PMO,NHAI, Haryana State

3. Key Issue/background
  Around 100 Japanese manufacturing plants are located along NH8 (Gurgaon,
  Manesar, Bawal and Neemrana). However, all of them suffer due to delayed
  transfer of products and/or parts because of severe traffic jams which occur
  frequently as a result of the long-pending Flyover construction on Bilaspur and
  Kapdiwas besides Old Rao Hotel of NH8. Due to this all such Japanese companies
  that have invested in the region as well as other industries incur heavy losses in
  transportation.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  There are many potential Japanese investors who want to set up manufacturing
  plants along NH8. Improvement of the road construction on NH8 (especially,
  Gurgaon, Manesar, Bawal and Neemrana) gives foreign investors’ confidence to
  invest in the areas along NH8 and will lead further investment from Japan. NH8 is
  required to become a stress-free highway for industries from Manesar to Delhi,
  Ahmedabad and Mumbai.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  In many Asian countries such as China, Thailand, Indonesia and Vietnam,
  resolving the traffic jam situation at access roads to industrial park is taken as a
  top priority issue in order to facilitate investment from abroad.

                                                                                     8
6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
      The remaining points are the flyovers of Bilaspur and Kapdiwas besides Old Rao
      Hotel. Those two Flyover projects put on Agenda by Haryana State Parliament in
      CY 2020. The support from Central Government is very much appreciated. PMO
      is also cognizant of these Flyover matters.

      [supplemental data]

      (1)       My write to PMO (FILED by PMO)

Honorable Prime Minister

1) My brief profile

I am Nobuhiro Takahashi, Managing Executive Officer of DENSO International India
Pvt. Ltd. DENSO group has a history of more than 30 years in India. We really
appreciate the Indian Central Government’s vision for expansion of business in India
and the vision of the developing infrastructure as the symbol of New India. I live in
Gurgaon continuing the fight with new virus with our members.

2) My small observation, as one of non-immigrant citizen staying in Delhi NCR, since
last 13 years, is as follows:

One of agenda of another 5 years to come for India is also the expansion of the Indian
economy size or Indian Domestic Market Value to realize new India through
Infrastructure development etc.,

                                                                                         9
My small understanding of Road Infrastructure is, that the Road Infrastructure is not
only for convenience of citizens and efficiency of economic activities to seek for the
independency of economy, not-depending on some specific country, eg. China
Communist Party, but the Road Infrastructure is the important infrastructure for the
defense and security. Without appropriate road infrastructure, how National Security
Guard can send troop on road to the required place. I was in India when the Radical
Islamic Terrorist attack happened at Mumbai in year 2008.

In the view of the defense and security, the connectivity of Road / Highway is
required to implement. All Highway and road are required to keep connectivity, for
National Security Guard to send troop immediately towards the require venue on road,
not only by air, like helicopter.

Now NH8 is very much important road infrastructure from Delhi to Ahmedabad. Many
Citizens requested Haryana State to complete Flyover Project at Bilaspur and Kapdiwas
besides Old Rao Hotel.

And on Haryana State Parliament, those project was discussed and put on the budget
2020.

NH8 is important for National Security Guard to send troop by road to Jaipur or
Ahmedabad with smooth traffic for immediate action of defense towards Radical
Islamic Terrorist attack.

In my small observation, Haryana State Parliament fully understood the importance of
Road Infrastructure, from that very sad historical incident happened in year 2008.

It might be required for Central Government to support Haryana State Government to
complete NH8 Flyover at Bilaspur and Kapdiwas besides Old Rao Hotel.

3)Finally, the strong intention of the Central Government to make India better, will
break through any obstacle to realize the new India for India’s Future Prosperity

                                                                                  (Finish)

                                                                                         10
(2)   Haryana State CM office write to Transport Bawan

                                                         (FINISH)

                                                               11
Suggestion No.1-3: Work on related roadway works in the runup to the
  CBIC (Chennai Bangalore Industrial Corridor) implementation

  Company:TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR INDIA PVT LTD,

1. Suggestion
  Development of ring roads toward implementation on CBIC (Chennai Bengalure
  Industrial Corridor)
  CBIC is the development concept which both Government of India and Japan
  promote in respond to economic development and investment conditions in
  Chennai, Bangalore, and their surrounding areas.
  We expect CBIC will realize increase in business competitiveness of companies in
  this area by developing effective accumulation of industries with necessary
  infrastructure, and further investments from Japanese companies.
  For this reason, we recognize enhancement of connectivity between key facilities,
  such as ports, National Highways and industrial parks, and the following major
  ring roads are of high priority and should be completed at the earliest.

  1) Chennai
  a. Peripheral Road (Chennai Peripheral Ring Road section 2/3/4/5)
  b. Northern Port Access Road (Chennai Peripheral Ring Road Section 1)
  c. Outer Ring Road

  2) Bengaluru
  a. Peripheral Ring Road
  b. Satellite Town Ring Road

2. Submission proposed to:
  NHAI, Karnataka State, Tamil nadu state

3. Key Issue/background
  1) Chennai

  a. Peripheral Road (Chennai Peripheral Ring Road Section 2/3/4/5)
  The completion of Peripheral Road will enable access to the Kamarajar Port (Ex.
  Ennore Port) without passing through Chennai city, thereby realizing direct road
  network connecting to major industrial parks such as Oragadam. Among others,
  assurance of linkage of this road network with Northern Port Access Road (Chennai

                                                                                 12
Peripheral Ring Road Section 1) which connects to the port is a prerequisite. As
the distance of Peripheral Road is pretty long, it is anticipated to take a plenty of
time to complete purchasing of lands. Therefore, it is important to divide the road
into sectors and prioritize construction work order for each sector. We hope the
development in the sector of Northern Port Access Road will be undertaken as a
top priority.

b. Northern Port Access Road (Chennai Peripheral Ring Road Section 1)
We strongly request the project will be proceeded in accordance with the following
timetable, which is presented to JICA:
 i) Completion of land acquisition within FY2020
 ii) Commencement of construction work within 1st quarter of FY2021
 iii) Completion of construction work by 3rd quarter of FY2023

Among others, the early realization of linkage between Northern Port Access Road
and Outer Ring Road (about 12km bypass between Ennor Port – TPP Link Road to
Minjur of Outer Ring Road II) is critical and this bypass should be available earlier
than expected completion of entire Northern Port Access Road (3rd quarter of
FY2023).

c. Outer Ring Road: Phase II (Nemmillicheri - Minjur)
98% of the work has been completed. However, the construction work has been
stopped in the 500m stretch of Nallur – Paduyanallur Road near National Highway
16 due to the pending land litigations.
The state Government is trying to settle the case by New Land Acquisition Law.
According to the site observation by JCCIC in March 2020, there is a sign of
solution. We strongly request the opening of the stretch within this year.

2) Bengaluru

a. Peripheral Ring Road (PRR)
The challenge is land acquisition. As per the information given by Chief Secretary,
the GoK Cabinet had approved the revised Proposal (including the approval to
avail JICA loan) of PRR in Dec 2019 and after that the project proposal was
resubmitted to Central Government. Also, the revised Environment Impact
Assessment (EIA) study was conducted (from Feb. 2019 to Feb. 2020) as guided
by the Supreme Court. The project is forwarded to Ministry of Finance for further

                                                                                   13
approval process and uploaded on its online portal. We would like to confirm the
  status and implementation schedule of this project.

  b. Satellite Town Ring Road (STRR)
  STRR Project will address the issues of enhancing the road network connecting
  several existing industrial areas where many Japanese companies are located.
  Though the construction work between Dabaspet – Doddaballapur – Devanahalli
  – Hoskote is partially commenced, but still behind the schedule. We would like to
  confirm countermeasure and construction schedule of the Road.
  We also would like to request GOI to commence land acquisition and construction
  work in remaining part (Hoskote – Anekal – Ramanagara – Magadi – Dapaspet).
  (STRR project is now being undertaken by NHAI, and the newly changed route is
  diverted via Hosur in Tamil Nadu)

4. How this proposal benefits India
  Early implementation of “Ring Roads” would enhance access to key ports, airports,
  and industrial parks thereby accelerating accumulation of companies.
  This road project would promote formulation of effective industrial clusters which
  would increase business competitiveness in the CBIC area.

  The linkage of Northern Port Access Road with Peripheral Road and Outer Ring
  Road in Chennai will realize revolutionary improvement in connectivity between
  Port Area (Kanarajar, Kattupalli) and Chennai Industrial Cluster, and what’s more,
  Bengaluru.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  N/A

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  1) Chennai

  a. Northern Port Access Road (Chennai Peripheral Ring Road Section 1):
  According JICA information as of July 2020, the project plan is scheduled as
  follows: i) completion of land acquisition within FY2020, ii) completion of
  construction work within 3rd quarter of FY2023.

  b. Outer Ring Road (Phase II):

                                                                                  14
According to explanation from the state government as of Oct. 2019, the state
government is seeking early settlement of the case by compensation based on the
new land acquisition law. JCCIC conducted the field survey in March 2020 and
found a sign of solution in the alleged area.

2) Bengaluru
In the DMC meeting held on 29th June 2020 between Karnataka Government,
Consulate General of Japan in Bengaluru and JCCIB, the State Govt. gave the
below explanation :

a. Peripheral Ring Road (PRR):
Around 1810 acres of land needs to be acquired for PRR additionally and there are
few compensation dispute going on between Government and farmer. Around
5800Cr. Fund is earmarked for the land acquisition.

b. Satellite Town Ring Road:
Regarding the STRR there were no information were provided by the GoK Side as
NHAI representative was not available. But physically there is not much progress
compared to the last DMC meeting.

c. Others:
Covid Lockdown has also slowed down the implementation of Infra projects due
to scarcity of the workforce. However, Commissioner Industries had informed that
the status of all the major road infra projects listed in DMC Agenda, will be
provided to Japanese side separately.

                                                                               15
①Junction with SH57 and NH4

②Junction with SH57 and NH45

③SH57 around Oragadam area
④Padappai Road

                               16
Suggestion No.1-4: Work on roadways around Chennai area

  Company:TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR INDIA PVT LTD / JCCII Chennai and Bengaluru

1. Suggestion
  Early completion of construction of SH 57 connecting NH4 and NH45
        Request for early commencement of these roads construction which
         stagnate due to delay in land acquisition.
        Easing of traffic congestion on Padappai Road

2. Submission proposed to:
  NHAI, Tamil Nadu State

3. Key Issue/background
  1) SH57 connecting NH4 and NH45
  SH57, which connects NH4 and NH45 is one of the most important roads
  connecting major industrial parks including the Sriperumbudur, Oragadam and
  Mahindra World City where automobile and major plants of other industries and
  related suppliers are concentrated. Improvement of access roads is vital for
  development of industry in these areas.

  a. The project to widen SH57 to 4 lanes is under way but freight transportation is
  still hindered since the construction in several locations have not started yet, so
  we would like to request GoTN to immediately confirm the status quo and
  complete widening of 4 lanes work.

  b. As to connection between SH57 and NH4 and its vicinity, we have been
  requesting continuously since 2011. As per the State Government information as
  of 2019, the work was expected to be completed by Dec 2019 but the work is not
  completed yet. We do hope it is completed at the earliest.

  c. As to connection between SH57 and NH45 and its vicinity, we also have been
  requesting continuously since 2011. As per the State Government information as
  of 2019, the work was expected to be completed by May 2019 but the work is not
  completed yet. We do hope it is completed at the earliest.

  2) Padappi Road joining Chennai city to Oragadam

                                                                                   17
The traffic congestion on the Padappai Road is a chronic issue, which is dversely
  affecting the business activities of the Japanese companies operating around
  Oragadam area and its vicinity. Padappai Road is an important bypass connecting
  Oragadam area to outer ring road. Once the Outer Ring Road is fully opened, the
  traffic congestion is expected to increase due to increase in number of vehicles.
  We do request for countermeasure to solve this congestion issue.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  Road development in Chennai city significantly contributes to improvement in
  logistics, transportation of goods, services and people. It realizes not only huge
  savings in time and cost of companies but also enhancement of business activities
  in Chennai and TN.

  Smooth and effective connectivity to Kamarajar / Chennai ports improves their
  global competitiveness so that TN may expect increase on in-out flow of goods,
  services, money and people via Kamarajar / Chennai ports.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  N/A

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  At the meeting between GoTN and JCCIC on 7th March 2019, GoTN reported
  progress of road construction projects as follows;
        SH57 & NH4 Crossing: The work is expected to be completed by Dec 2019
        HS57 & NH45 connecting road: The work is expected to be completed by
         May 2019. Meanwhile, it is expected that the tender for the connecting
         bridge will be commenced, once General Elections are over.
        SH57 around Oragadam Junction Area: Stopped due to pending land
         litigation but is expected to be resolved by June 2019.

  Despite the above explanation, the work is not completed as of Oct. 2019. The
  issue is raised and reminded in the meeting held on 25th of Oct.,2019 between
  DPIIT and JCCII (represented by Toyota kirloskar). According to the field survey
  conducted by JCCIC July 2020, the works for above two connections are not
  completed yet.
  In the Oragadam area, all construction works in the Oragadam junction and its
  byroads are completed in 2020. We would like to express our sincere thanks and
  appreciation to GoTN and all relevant stakeholders for their supports.

                                                                                  18
Suggestion No.1-5:Work on roadways around Bangalore area

  Company:TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR INDIA PVT Ltd/JCCII Chennai and Bengaluru

1. Suggestion
  Improve the connectivity in and around Bangalore. Early completion of
  construction of the roads mentioned in column of KEY ISSUE/BACKGROUND

2. Submission proposed to:
  NHAI, Karnakata State

3. Key Issue/background
  We have requested improvement of the following roads since 2011. Though there
  is progress partially, concrete construction schedule is not fully explained. We
  would like to request for concrete construction schedule of these roads.

  1) Improvement in connectivity between NH4 (Narsapur) and NH7 (Hosur) via
     Malur (G-I in the map below)
  2) Early completion of widening of NH-209 at the earliest (D-C ditto)
  3) Considering the increase in newly established Japanese companies in couple
     of years, in addition to the above mentioned route (G-I) the below routes also
     need to be improved.
     a. Hoskote - Malur (L-H)
     b. Vemagal – Devanhalli (J-K)
     c. Narasapura – Vemagal (G-J) (this has been proposed during the meeting
     with Karnataka State Govt. & DMC in 2018)

4. How this proposal benefits India
  Reducing the traffic congestion will improve the efficiency of the business activities
  and cost competitiveness.
  Improvement of the connectivity among NH4, NH7, NH207 and NH209 etc will
  increase the efficiency of procurement of the components/raw materials for
  manufacturing industries.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  N/A

                                                                                      19
6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  At the 14th DMC meeting held on June 29th 2020 among GoK, Consulate General
  of japan in Bangalore and JCCIB on 6 May 2019, GoK made a following additional
  explanation:
  Although the above roads G-I, L-H, J-K and G-J were planned to be completed by
  June 2020, the construction work are delayed cue to the lockdown (not yet
  completed as of Aug., 2020).
  As to the above road D-C, the work is delayed due to the lockdown, and is now
  expected to be completed by March 2021.

                                                                              20
Suggestion No.1-6:Upgrade of Kamarajar Port

  Company:TOYOTA KIRLOSKAR INDIA PVT LTD, JCCII Chennai and Bengaluru

1. Suggestion
  1) Construction of Additional Berth (Counter swelling measure)
  2) Confirmation on continuous usage of temporary jetty for Over Dimension
     Cargo barge shipment at Kamarajar port

2. Submission proposed to:
  Tamil Nadu State, Kamarajar Port Autority

3. Key Issue/background
  1) Construction of Additional Berth (Counter swelling measure )
  Since Kamarajar port’s entry gate is open to South East direction, big swell often
  occurs inside of the port especially during the south west monsoon season (March
  to November) and there are concerns for damage to vessels and berth by
  movement of large vessels which dock at General Cargo Berth. Even relatively
  small movements can cause delay for cargo loading / unloading work because
  vessels have to be docked out in order to prevent risk for collision. The permission
  from NOC and Environment Dept. should be taken at the earliest, and we request
  to commence construction of Additional Berth at the earliest.

  2) Confirmation on continuous usage of temporary jetty for Over Dimension
     Cargo barge shipment at Kamarajar port.
  Under the current master plan, the area which is used for construction of
  temporary jetty for barge land, is scheduled to be used for bulk terminal space.
  In this case, there will be no more place for construction of temporary jetty for
  barge land. Thus barge shipment of over dimension cargo (ex. Turbine for project)
  from Kamarajar port will become impossible. According to explanation from Indian
  side, it is difficult to change the masterplan, however Japan side can continue to
  use the temporary jetty. Therefore we need an official confirmation on this.

                                                                                    21
4. How this proposal benefits India
  Counter swelling measures can prevent delays in cargo loading / unloading and
  damage to vessels. This improvement contributes to improve value of the port,
  so that it will increase trade amount in the port.

  Confirmation of continuous usage of temporary jetty for over dimension cargo
  barge shipment at Kamarajar port. The amended plan will enable Kamarajar port
  to continue Over Dimension Cargo barge shipment so that it will maintain
  necessary business environment which is vital for foreign and Indian companies
  handling over dimension cargo and operating in this area. It will further attract
  additional foreign investments from those companies that handle similar Over
  Dimension Cargo.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  N/A

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  At the meeting held on 16th Oct., 2019 between DIPP and JCCII, the
  communication are as follows:

  Countermeasure for swelling
  Kamarajar Port Authority
  We are installing 14 fenders and not additional berth to tackle the problem.
  
  The swelling issue is not being solved by the fenders and additional counter
  measures are needed.
  (Photos which show damaged vessels and alongside of the port by the swelling
  were submitted.)

  Amendment of Masterplan
  
  (a verbal explanation) Indian side will not be amending the master plan but
  continuous usage of temporary jetty is possible.
  
  If the usage of a temporary jetty is allowed, we would like to have a formal
  confirmation in this regard from GoTN & Kamarajar port authority.

                                                                                 22
The above 1) and 2) are again raised and reminded in the meeting held on 25th
of Oct., 2019 between DPIIT and JCCII (represented by Toyota Kirloskar Motor).

                                                                            23
Segment 2 TAX System

  Suggestion No.2-1:Consumption stimulus measures/Unilateral import
  tariff changes

  Company:NGK SPARK PLUGS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.

1. Subject of proposed submission:
  1) Implementation of consumption stimulus measures
        We strongly urge implementation of urgent consumption stimulus measures
         by reducing the automobile excise tax (28%)
  2) Improving the method of unilateral import tariff changes
        We would request a long-term policy and a grace period to prepare for the
         changes before they take effect.
        We would the government to initiate dialogue with business organizations.

2. Submission proposed to:
  Ministry of Finance

3. Key Issue/background
  1) Implementation of consumption stimulus measures
  In accordance with the government's "Make in India" policy, so far our company
  has accelerated local production and made significant investments in products to
  meet the new BS6 regulations. However due to the stagnation of the market and
  economy, the growth of our customers (automotive) has fallen sharply since
  November 2018, which has had a significant impact on our company.                The
  government's proposed budget does not provide any support or consumption
  stimulus to the existing automotive industry, and there is no indication that the
  growth rate will recover. In addition, the coronavirus is sure to cause a year-on-
  year decline in growth in 2021.

  2) Improving the method of unilateral import tariff changes
  So far every year there has been a series of tariff hikes in the automotive industry,
  and in the 2018 budget, the tariffs on our imported auto parts and components
  have been increased (from 7. 5% to 15. 0%), which has affected our business
  plan as we have not been able to make the planned profits.              The sudden
  announcement of the tariffs every year and the fact that the specific figures are

                                                                                     24
not known until after the tariffs are actually enacted have become a big problem
   for the business.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  1) Implementation of consumption stimulus measures
  The recovery of the automobile industry, one of India's key industries, will improve
  the livelihood of the people engaged in this industry and contribute to the country's
  sustainable development in the medium to long term.

  2) Improving the method of unilateral import tariff changes
  Since the hon'ble government seeks to promote Make in India, it is all the more
  counterproductive for foreign companies to have to be or become cautious about
  investing in India, or even to have to withdraw from India.      Acknowledging the
  enduring good relationship between government and business will go a long way
  in making the decision to invest in India easier for corporations.

5. Comparison with global standards
  1) Implementation of consumption stimulus measures
  To improve the balance of trade by strengthening the growth industries in one's
  own country and making them grow not only for domestic demand but also for
  subsequent export industries.

  2) Improving the method of unilateral import tariff changes
  It is easier to plan and promote investment in countries that have long-term
  implementation plans based on FTAs and EPAs.

6. Historical trajectory of negotiations
   N/A

                                                                                     25
Suggestion No.2-2:Reduction of corporate tax rate for foreign branches

  Company: JCCII Finance WG

1. Subject of proposed submission
  In India, the effective tax rate for domestic corporations is normally 26-35%,
  while that for branches of foreign corporations is around 41-44%.
  We request that the tax rate for branches of foreign corporations should be
  reduced to the same level as that for domestic corporations.

2. Submission proposed to:
  Ministry of Finance

3. Key Issue/background
  A large number of Japanese companies are currently operating in India as local
  subsidiaries, but banks, due to regulatory issues such as PSLs, are often operating
  in India as branches rather than as local entities.
  The corporate tax rate of 41-44% is remarkably high compared even to other
  countries, and is an obstacle for banks to expand business in India.
  They are thus not on an equal footing in competing with local banks in India.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  The financial health of foreign banks in India will be enhanced by the increase in
  profits and retained earnings of banks.
  A reduction in the corporate tax rate will provide an incentive for foreign banks to
  expand business in India and will contribute to the expansion of the Indian
  economy by strengthening financial functions.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  In Japanese law there is no difference in the corporate tax rate for a branch office
  of a foreign corporation and a local corporation of Japan.

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  N/A

                                                                                    26
Suggestion No.2-3:Tariff on TV Open Cells etc…

  Company: Sony India Pvt. Ltd.

1. Subject of proposed submission
  1) To continue with the 0% Basic Custom Duty(BCD) policy on TV Open Cell (is
     slated to become 5% when current policy expires on September 30, 2020)
  2) Duty exemption for LCM (Liquid Crystal Module) and SMT (Surface-mount
     technology) (LCM parts 15%, SMT parts 10%)
  3) Reduction of tariffs on OLED panels (currently 15%)

2. Submission proposed to:
  DPIIT

3. Key Issue/background
  On December 15, 2017 and February 1, 2018, import duty on television
  components was increased.     Following this development, we had presented the
  Government of India, in cooperation with the Embassy of India and JCCI, to reduce
  or eliminate BCD on locally manufactured components, and the BCD on Open Cell
  was reduced to 0% from October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020. However, as
  this appears to be an ad-hoc measure and duration of the measure specified, there
  is an apprehension that duty would be re-imposed.
  In addition, some parts of LCM (Liquid Crystal Module) and SMT (Surface-mount
  technology) are subject to further duty increase (LCM parts 10% to 15%, SMT
  parts 0% to 10%).     In addition, the BCD on OLED, the latest technology, has
  been increased to 15%, which makes for a major gap difference between the BCD
  on OLED and the existing Open Cell technology –this will have the effect of
  negating the benefits of local production in India.
  The effect would directly translate to pushing up the cost of parts procurement for
  companies like us who are producing TVs in India, and eliminate the price
  competitiveness vis-à-vis imported TVs.      We shall not be able to derive the
  advantage of local production and benefit the end customers.        This is in our
  considered view, not serve the Indian government's policy of "Make in India" and
  would be a disincentive; we would therefore, strongly urge the government to
  review the import tariffs on electronic components to encourage and promote
  manufacturers in India.

                                                                                   27
4. How this proposal benefits India
  If India becomes a major production base for TVs, it will boost investment (capex)
  and employment.
  If India becomes a major TV production base, we could seriously consider
  exporting TV products from India to the Middle East and Africa. For this we need
  stability and certainty of government policy not in the short term but in the
  medium and long term to lend assurance to investors.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  N/A

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  When we had a meeting with the MoF in June 2019 the government's position
  was: "Isn't the impact insignificant since the tariff on Open Cell, which accounts
  for 70% of the TV components, is 5%, which is less than 1% in terms of retail
  price?”
  To this, we would reiterate that while Open Cell is taxed at 5%, other parts are
  taxed at 7.5% to 15%. However, finished TV can be imported at 0% by applying
  the ASEAN-India prescribed rate.      In a fiercely competitive TV market, these
  tariffs have significant impact on the price of products, which is detrimental to the
  companies that have invested and are promoting "Make in India" and strive to
  manufacture locally.

                                                                                     28
Segment 3 Government Response

  Suggestion No.3-1:Clarification of e-commerce site management
  standards for foreign companies

  Company: Sony India Pvt. Ltd.

1. Subject of proposed submission
  Clarification of e-commerce site management standards for foreign companies
  We request the government to clearly indicate the required percentage of local
  production ratio and the concept of local production ratio that needs to be met in
  order to operate an e-commerce business (whether it indicated the %age of local
  production for the company as a whole should be met, or whether it is necessary
  to meet the %age for each product category).

2. Submission proposed to:
  DPIIT (Department for Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade)

3. Key Issue/background
  Although Sony India is expanding its local production in India and believes that it
  meets the criteria for selling products through e-commerce platform. It does not
  however undertake B2C at this time. However, it does not produce all of its
  products in India, and is unclear whether product categories which are not
  produced locally or where it has a low percentage of local production are also
  eligible to be directly marketed in B2C model on a company owned e-commerce
  platform. Due to this lack of clarity we are unable to launch a Sony India-owned
  B2C site because we cannot determine whether we meet the criteria or whether
  we need to meet the standards for each individual product category.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  1) Will help eliminate the middleman margins, we will be able to pass on this
     value to the end customer, and contribute to the expansion of consumption
  2) Will greatly aid expansion of e-commerce in India.       (= expansion of local
     production)
  3) Will offer convenience of speed and choice to end customer (simple website
     improvements, contents updates, etc. , that can be quickly implemented in-
     house)

                                                                                   29
4) Will help facilitate customer convenience through the offer of products which
     compliments and provides useful and value added choice to end customer
     through e-commerce (e. g. , TVs and home theaters)

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  In most countries when a company builds/operates an e-commerce site, it is a
  normal business practice to be able to decide whether to control it directly or
  indirectly, depending on the objectives/requirements and strategies of the
  company.

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  Meetings were held with DPIIT in November 2019 and we have yet to receive a
  definitive response to our representation.
  Communication through CEAMA and other industry groups continues to be
  ongoing.

                                                                                30
Suggestion No.3-2:Simplification of the exemption application for repeat
  use materials

  Company: JCCII Steel Subcommittee (Japanese companies operating in the steel
  space in India)

1. Subject of proposed submission
  Simplification of the exemption application for repeat materials
  1) Simplification or elimination of the procedures for applying for exemptions or
     approvals of mandatory Indian standards for steel products.
  2) When importing products not covered by the standard, we have to apply for
     exemption/certification every time at every import customs clearance.
  3) Please simplify or omit the each-time application/certification procedures for
     products that have been cleared for exemption once.

2. Submission proposed to:
  Ministry of Steel, Government of India

3. Key Issue/background
  Many steel products currently being exported from Japan to India are difficult to
  obtain in India, and most of them are imported by consumers as part of their
  purchasing policies to diversify procurement risks.
  Importers have to go through the application/certification procedures every time
  they import, even where a product that has been approved as exempt in the past,
  which imposes a burden on them in terms of time and labor.
  In addition, due to this unstable application/certification timeframe, it becomes
  necessary to maintain safety stocks at the site, which imposes a cost burden on
  distributors and consumers.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  In the past dialogues with the Ministry of Steel, we have sought to expedite the
  approval process, but the response has been that there are too many cases so
  this has been difficult to address.
  We believe that addressing this issue will also speedily reduce the burden of the
  approval process for the Indian authorities (the standing committee of the Ministry
  of Steel).

                                                                                   31
A smooth product import environment will naturally promote local production in
  India.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  1) Malaysia
  There is an exemption system by usage category.            There are operational
  guidelines from the import control authority (Ministry of Trade).
  Approval is valid for one year.

  2) Indonesia
  Application is made to the standards authority (Ministry of Industry) to confirm
  that the products to be shipped do not conform to the contents of the mandatory
  standards document.
  The Ministry of Industry assesses the application and issues an import quota (valid
  for one year).

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  Once every six months, the Ministry of Steel and the Japanese parties (Metals
  Division, METI, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, JCCII/Sectional Committee
  member companies) have an opportunity to have a dialogue with Indian
  authorities.   This and other procedures were similarly requested carried in the
  last meeting held on January 30, 2020.
  (Since then an opportunity for dialogue was not established due to the effects of
  the pandemic).

                                                                                   32
Suggestion No.3-3:Flexible implementation timeline for mandatory
  standards amidst the pandemic environment

  Company: JCCII Steel Subcommittee (Japanese companies operating in the steel
  space in India)

1. Subject of proposed submission
  Flexible implementation of mandatory standards in the new corona environment.
  The Government of India requires steel products imported into the country to be
  covered by the Indian mandatory standards.
  The number of products subject to this requirement is expanding, and exporters
  are required to be certified to this standard at the time of deployment and at the
  time of renewal.
  In particular, for the new certification a local (Japan-based) audit by an inspector
  of the Indian authorities is required.
  Under the current corona environment, the planned dispatch of inspectors to
  Japan has been cancelled, and no new applications have been accepted.
  Meanwhile, the date of enforcement of the standard has been specified, and as of
  now, the application procedure has not been completed.         Thus import of the
  relevant products will not be allowed.
  We request that the start of application of the Indian mandatory standards be put
  on hold until the effects of the pandemic are resolved and normalcy returns i. e.
  such as when the Indian authorities can once again dispatch inspectors to Japan.

  Specific examples of cases where the procedures are not proceeding because of
  no-audit situation
  IS standard IS9550 2001 (effective July 23, 2020)
  IS standard IS5517 1993 (effective July 23, 2020)
  IS standard IS4398 1994 (to be enforced on November 15, 2020)
  IS standard IS1993 2018 (to be enforced on January 13, 2021, six months after
  the announcement in the Official Gazette)
  IS standard IS12591 2018 (to be enforced on January 13, 2021, six months after
  the announcement in the Official Gazette)

  There is a move to make new ISs mandatory in the future, and we would like to
  see a reasonable enforcement date set for these as well.

                                                                                    33
2. Submission proposed to:
  Ministry of Steel, Government of India

3. Key Issue/background
  The majority of steel products currently exported to India are difficult to procure
  within India and are imported by consumers as part of their purchasing policies
  to diversify procurement risks.
  In the event that these products cannot be imported, the production and activities
  of Indian manufacturers and other consumers will be greatly affected.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  By providing a stable ecosystem to procure products that are difficult to replace
  with domestic products, we will be able to avoid disruptions to consumer
  production and activities

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  1) Malaysia
  The authorities have informed us that they will conduct a web-based audit in place
  of the on-site audit.   The content of the audit is currently being coordinated with
  the authorities (expected to be conducted in September).
  2) Indonesia
  The authorities presented their intention to conduct a web-based audit. Specific
  details will be coordinated in the near future.

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  We as a company have already submitted a letter to the Bureau of Indian
  Standards (BIS) requesting certification without an audit.    We also submitted a
  letter to the Ministry of Steel requesting the postponement of the enforcement of
  the compulsory standards until an audit scenario is ready. We also contacted Ms.
  Mona Khandhar IAS , Minister (Economic & Commerce), Embassy of India, Tokyo,
  who commented that she would convey the information to the home country office.

                                                                                    34
Suggestion No.3-4: GST exemption on medicines

  Company: Eisai Corporation

1. Subject of proposed submission
  We request GST exemption on medicines provided free of charge for humanitarian
  purposes through the United Nations Organization (WHO) (currently a refundable
  mechanism post-payment)

2. Submission proposed to:
  GoI (MoF, MoHFW, MIC)
  WHO Southeast Asia regional office, India desk

3. Key Issue/background
  Eisai's Indian subsidiary (Eisai Pharmaceuticals India Pvt.   Ltd (EIL) )has been
  providing free of charge DEC (diethylcarbamazine) tablets for the treatment of
  lymphatic filariasis to India through the United Nations Organization (WHO) for
  humanitarian purposes. EIL is located in a Special Economic Zone (SEZ) in Andhra
  Pradesh. Since the start of the provision of the tablets they were exempted from
  taxation due to the free provision for humanitarian purposes. However, with the
  introduction of GST in 2017, the system changed so GST has to be paid once and
  then refunded.   The Government of India has therefore demanded that WHO
  India, the supplier of DEC tablets to India, pay GST (approximately Rs.        50
  million) from the introduction of GST up to August 2019 shipments. Since WHO
  India does not have the capacity to pay the said tax, EIL paid it on its behalf in
  October 2019 in accordance with the direction from the SEZ customs office. The
  refund of this said amount is still pending although it should have been refunded.

  To begin with assistance such as this should be GST-exempted given its
  humanitarian and free-provision nature under the United Nations Organization
  (WHO). The logic that this is a temporary payment that will be refunded in due
  course does not stand ground given the prohibitively high tax amount and the
  burden it places on the company.      The issues to be address are 1. exemption
  of the GST for future DEC supply to India, 2. refund of the tax paid.

  Please also note that the Government of India through the MoHFW has requested
  an additional 150 million new DEC (diethylcarbamazine) tablets through WHO

                                                                                  35
headquarters as part of the drive for domestic control of lymphatic filariasis in
  India by 2020. However since the problem of refunds has not been resolved the
  shipment cannot be made as we await a resolution.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  GST tax exemption will enable EIL to provide the drug needed for lymphatic
  filariasis control activities in India.   The supply of around 200 million tablets a
  year is requested and if available in the market, it will save hundreds of millions
  in cost burden.   This amount will be used for the actual control program in rural
  areas, which will ensure the control of the disease and increase the probability of
  achieving the planned control date of 2025.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  WHO headquarters in Switzerland has issued a document requesting tax
  exemptions for drugs provided free of charge to the countries that accept them,
  and these exemptions are usually granted.         However, some countries refuse to
  accept the drugs for reasons such as industry protection, and in such cases
  negotiations are conducted case by case.

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  In July, a letter from the head of the WHO South East Asia Regional Office for
  India was sent to the Government of India requesting a resolution to this issue.
  No specific response yet.

                                                                                    36
Suggestion No.3-5:Clarification and proper documentation of India's
  post-marketing commitments

  Company: Eisai Corporation

1. Subject of proposed submission
  Clarification and proper documentation of India's post-marketing commitments

2. Submission proposed to:
  Government of India
  Ministry of Health & Family Welfare
  Directorate General of Health Services
  Central Drugs Standard control Organization (CDSCO)
  Dr.V.G.Somani, Drugs Controller General of India

3. Key Issue/background
  In India, data collection methods and procedures for post-marketing safety
  measures are not yet clear in some parts, which poses a problem in terms of
  predictability of development.
  When a new drug that is widely used overseas is approved, a post-marketing
  surveillance or a Ph4 clinical study is sometimes required as a condition for
  approval, but there are no clear criteria to determine which of these two is
  required.
  In addition, although the PSUR is stipulated to be 4 years in principle and is
  supposed to be accompanied by summaries of the investigations/clinical studies,
  the final report of the investigations/clinical studies is expected to take more
  than 4 years to complete considering the implementation period, analysis and
  preparation period, and there is no procedure for submission of the final results
  report to the regulatory authorities and for confirmation, etc.
  Drug costs for conducting ph4 clinical trials are borne by the company.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  Clarification of post-marketing procedures so that data can be collected
  appropriately will promote the proper use of medicines.
  Adequate development cost sharing leads to appropriate pricing, which
  contributes to an affordable price point for patients and improves overall access
  to medicines.

                                                                                     37
5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  In Japan and Korea, post-marketing surveillance and self-reporting are used and
  there are very few cases in which Ph4 clinical trials are mandated. In Europe,
  and the US, USA, and other countries, post-marketing surveillance is often
  limited to periodic safety reports by companies. Japan and Korea have a well-
  defined re-examination system and a clear defined review process.
  Local manufacturing in other countries

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  Indian authorities’ stand is that there should be a focus on their own data and
  are concerned about racial differences. However there has been no consistent
  view on the issue.
  The post-marketing survey does not clearly state that the companies will not
  bear the cost of using commercially available products.

                                                                                    38
Suggestion No.3-6: Implementation of Proper plastic regulations

  Company: Canon India Pvt.Ltd.

1. Subject of proposed submission

  1) Plastic materials used in the manufacturing / packaging of Electrical and
     Electronic Equipment (EEE) are the integral part of products as they protect
     the electronic products in global supply chain logistics. Hence the plastic used
     in the manufacturing / packaging of EEE should be exempted under the said
     rules as per the exemption provided under conditions clause 4 (d) under the
     rules.

  2) Plastic Rules are seen to be more aligned towards FMCG sector & local plastic
     manufacturer. Need to relook the requirements which are practically
     impossible for the EEE/ IT industry to implement. GOI should issue the
     clarification that the plastic used in the manufacturing / packaging of Electrical
     and Electronic Equipment (EEE) are exempted under the said rules.

  3) Thickness of plastic sheet / packaging to 50 microns or above is not
     harmonized with global business environment        as well as this may lead to
     increased plastic consumption which is not good for environment.

  4) Uniform EPR framework: For harmonies enforcement of Plastics Waste
     Management rule in the country in consultation with the industry

  5) State Rules are not harmonized with Central PWM rules which makes it further
     difficult for the industry to smoothly do their business in India.   Proposing for
     One Country –One Rule for Ease of Doing Business in India.

2. Submission proposed to:
   Government: Central Government.
   Reference Ministry: Ministry of Environment Forest & Climate Change.
   Person In-charge: Secretary, Mr. Rameshwar Prasad Gupta.
                      Joint Secretary, Ms. Geeta Menon.

                                                                                     39
3. Key Issue/background
  1) Thickness of plastic: Increasing the thickness of plastic sheet/ packaging to 50
     microns or above is not harmonized with global business environment. Globally,
     the efforts are to reduce weight/amount of packaging in all other countries.

  2) Marking & Labeling: Multi layered packaging (MLP) should be printed with
     name, registration no of the manufacturer which is unique & India specific. It
     will be impossible to get local plastic manufacturers get aligned with the global
     EEE/ICT manufacturers or the global packaging manufacturers get registered
     here in India. Hence marking & labeling is not possible.

  3) Lack of clarity on regulation: Rules are more aligned towards plastic
     manufacturers/ local plastic packaging / FMCG industry. Plastic Packaging of
     EEE/ ICT industry is an integral part of global supply chain to ensure safety &
     functionality of the product.

  4) Central Rules vs State Rules on PWM implementation:           State Rules are not
     harmonized with Central Rules, creating further implementation challenges for
     the industry.

4. How this proposal benefits India
  1) Harmonizing the requirements with the Global scenario and State law
     harmonization with Central Law will ensure Ease of doing business in India.
  2) Unique compliance requirement restricts many global companies to expand
     their business operations or to consider a fresh investment in India and with
     removal of such bottlenecks it may bring fresh investment in India.

5. Comparable global standards/best practices
  In EU, Carry bags less than 50 microns is controlled by Directive 94/62/EC
  packaging and packaging waste. However scope is limited only to carry bags, not
  including plastic used for electrical/ electronic products or its parts.

6. Trajectory of discussions/government response
  Response is awaited from MOEFCC against many letters/ representation sent.
  However, recently MOEFCC has issued a Uniform Framework for Extended
  Producers Responsibility in which industry have some observations & sought
  clarification.

                                                                                    40
You can also read