Social Housing in NSW - Submission - February 2015

Page created by Jeremy Wise
 
CONTINUE READING
Social Housing in NSW

     Submission

      February 2015

             AGED & COMMUNITY SERVICES NSW & ACT
            PO Box 3124 Rhodes NSW 2138 | (02) 8754 0400
                        mail@acs.asn.au | www.acs.asn.au
                    ABN 13 737 853 254 | ACN 124 322 916
ABOUT ACS

Aged & Community Services NSW & ACT (ACS) is the leading peak body supporting
church, charitable and not for profit providers of retirement living, community and residential
care services for older people. ACS is a member of the national peak Aged & Community
Services Australia.

ACS represents 300 organisations managing 2,000 services to more than 100,000 people.

Our members range from large multisite, multiservice organisations to the small
metropolitan, rural and regional organisations across NSW and the ACT.

ACS established and supports a network of 12 regional and 9 advisory committees.

Relying solely on member fees and receiving no government funding, we are well positioned
to be a strong and independent advocate for the sector. From time to time ACS may deliver
government funded projects of benefit to the sector.

INTRODUCTION

ACS appreciates the invitation to contribute input and comment on the future of the NSW
social housing system as put forward in Social Housing in NSW: A discussion paper for input
and comment, November 2014. We understand some of the challenges that the social
housing system is facing and we support a review towards delivering better outcomes for
people in need.

We believe that the supply and demand of social housing is impacted by the supply and
delivery of housing across the broader community. Although the issues of social housing
may seem separate, it is obviously connected to the broader housing economy and its
related planning and policies.

ACS and its members are concerned with the provision of affordable and appropriate
housing for seniors. In this document we put forward recommendations which would directly
or indirectly affect the supply and delivery of affordable housing for seniors which in turn
impacts on the demand for social housing.

THE AGEING COHORT

The ageing of the Australian population in the coming decades will be accompanied by a
steady decline in outright home ownership. This shift will increase demand for affordable
age-friendly housing options as older renters and mortgage holders on low incomes seek to
reduce their housing costs. It also has significant implications for policies designed to

ACS NSW Social Housing submission 2015.doc                                       Page 2
support older Australians as increasingly current arrangements assume, and even rely on,
housing stability and home ownership as the norm.

Although older Australians have higher rates of home ownership than all other age groups,
recent data shows that almost a quarter of people aged over 65 are either renting or still
paying off a mortgage. According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, 7.5 per cent of
Australians aged 65 and over were paying off a mortgage, while 13.5 per cent were renting.
This trend is reflected in several studies which show that the number of people still paying off
mortgages as they approach and enter retirement has been steadily increasing since the
1990s.

In the 21st century, the number of older people in non-stable housing situations has been
increasing at a faster rate than population ageing. From 2001 to 2026, AHURI predicted that:
   •   The number of renters aged 65 and over in low-income households would increase
       by 115 per cent from 195,000 to 419,000;
   •   Low-income, sole-person households were projected to grow by 120 per cent over
       the same period from 110,800 to 243,600, approximately two-thirds of which will be
       made up of older women; and
   •   The demand for housing suited to older, low-income couples would increase by 117
       per cent from 32,200 to 69,900 (by 2026).
   Bridge,C et al (2011). ‘Age-specific housing and care for low to moderate income older people’, AHURI Report No. 174

DECLINING HOUSING AFFORDABILITY

At the same time as the demand for affordable and appropriate housing for older people
grows, it is becoming increasingly difficult to develop and purchase housing in a manner that
is accessible and affordable. This trend has been characterised by a combination of limited
supply and strong demand.

Excessive regulatory burdens on organisations providing housing have simultaneously
limited the supply and inflated the cost of housing. Planning and infrastructure costs from
state and local governments increase the cost of land and therefore housing. These costs
include development application fees, the cost of planning delays, stamp duty, council rates
and augmentation costs for utilities. In addition, governments have shifted much of the cost
of public infrastructure, such as roads, lighting, footpaths, to organisations that are building
housing solutions. This all adds to the price of land, making housing less affordable.

Further upward pressure on housing prices is coming from current tax arrangements, such
as the capital gains tax, negative gearing, capital works deductions and depreciation
provisions. As well as impacting on housing prices, the current tax arrangements are also
inefficient. For this reason, the ‘Henry Tax Review’ called for a broadly based land tax that
would apply equally to all land uses, but could have a threshold and different rates based on

ACS NSW Social Housing submission 2015.doc                                                             Page 3
the value per square metre of land. Over time, this new land tax would replace existing state
taxes.

RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Universal housing design
We support the mainstream adoption of liveable housing design principles in all new houses
built in Australia. This means designing and building a house for everyone, including the
very young, elderly or disabled. This would reduce the need for retrofits and allow older
Australians to remain comfortably in their homes for longer.

2. Integrated housing strategy
We support the development of a joint national affordable housing strategy by all three levels
of government to increase the supply of affordable and accessible housing by streamlining
planning processes, reforming tax arrangements that inflate house prices, and providing
incentives for incorporating elements of universal design. Specifically government could:
   •   Grant density concessions for purpose-built housing for older Australians
   •   Reform current tax arrangements that serve to drive house prices upwards
   •   Release adequate supplies of reasonably priced land for affordable housing
       developments
   •   Provide affordable and accessible public transport
   •   Provide accessible outdoor environments
   •   Harmonise housing, planning and retirement village legislation throughout Australia
   •   Streamline planning approval mechanisms and minimise regulation ‘red tape’ for
       building construction
   •   Provide incentives to include universal and accessible design features in new
       housing developments

3. Zero interest loans
We support the provision of zero interest loans and/or innovative funding available to
upgrade and expand targeted housing solutions for older Australians. This capital assistance
would prioritise upgrades to dated Independent Living Unit stock and projects that include
accessible design, integrated care services, opportunities for community engagement and
support for low income, low asset residents.

4. Equity release schemes
We support allowing income poor home owners to access the equity in their home to enable
greater choice. Such schemes could be used to contribute to care costs, improve or modify
the home to make it more suitable for older residents or to help improve quality of life. In its
landmark report, the Productivity Commission recommended the introduction of a
government-backed home equity release scheme that would enable older home owners to
draw down small, regular amounts of money. Guidelines would have to set out amounts that

ACS NSW Social Housing submission 2015.doc                                       Page 4
could be drawn down and for what purposes. The impact on means testing would need to be
determined. Equity release schemes could also apply to superannuation assets.

5. Appoint NSW Housing Minister
We support the NSW State Government appointing a dedicated Minister for Housing tasked
with a portfolio to increase the supply of affordable housing and improve housing
affordability. The Minister would set and work with affordable housing targets on the state
and regional levels.

6. Age pensioners saving account scheme
We support the introduction of an age pensioners saving account scheme in which older
Australians could invest the surplus from the sale of their home. The money in this account
scheme would be dedicated to future care and living costs and would be exempt from the
asset and income test for the age pension. This would remove one of the barriers to those
wishing to downsize or right size to more appropriate accommodation.

7. Reinstate National Rental Affordability Scheme (NRAS)
As at June 2014, NRAS had delivered 21,000 affordable dwellings with a further 16,000
under development. The fifth round of NRAS was cancelled by the federal government in
the 2014/15 Budget. This scheme was taken on by a few aged care providers delivering age
appropriate and affordable rental arrangements. We support the reinstatement of any such
scheme.

ACS NSW Social Housing submission 2015.doc                                     Page 5
You can also read