SIMULATION, SOFTWARE AND PERFORMANCE STATUS AND PLANS FOR RUN2 - S. Spagnolo using input from F. Anulli, L. Bellagamba, G. Chiodini, M. Kuna, M ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
SIMULATION, SOFTWARE AND PERFORMANCE STATUS AND PLANS FOR RUN2 S. Spagnolo using input from F. Anulli, L. Bellagamba, G. Chiodini, M. Kuna, M. Corradi, S. Monzani, N. Orlando, M. Primavera, M. Verducci S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
OUTLINE
RPC data decoding and mapping
updates for RUN2
RPC Offline data quality Disclaimer
low level performance measurement and
RPC Online DQ [M. Della Pietra, A.
monitoring Bruni] not covered here
RPC and simulation
Low-Level Performance Studies only
Detector Description Simulation and Digitization [related to basic detector behaviour]
are reported
LVL1 simulation: MCP studies outside the scope of
this talk
New Trigger Road definition and
implementation RPC performance studies on
calibration stream (RUN1) [B. Liberti,
RPC calibration L. Mazzaferro et al.] not covered here
time calibration: online and offline (something in backup)
gap efficiency and strip-panel efficiency Other relevant contributions may have
been unintentionally omitted
RPC condition data
TO DO List
2
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING
DATA = Offline data reconstruction and data processing in the HLT
Decoding: two steps
bytestream to RDO converters (dumping in OO format the bytestream)
requires to a limited extent the cabling-model - DATA
RDO to PrepRawData (hits in offline format for input to reconstruction)
strongly depends on the cabling-model - DATA and MC
Encoding: the reverse steps, require the inverse cabling-model [offline to online
indices] - MC
Cabling-Model:
implements both the online-to-offline and offline-to-online mapping
source are maps in the Condition Database (COOL) common to DATA and MC
(ascii format also supported, for testing/development)
All these software components involve several packages in the MuonSpectrometer
and Trigger offline software domains; still based on the original core implementation
but widely revised in 2010 with streamlined dependencies and use of generic tools
(e.g. detector description) + use of condition DB to store Interval-of-Validity dependent
maps
3
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING
What’s new in the system for RUN 2: extra chambers in the feet (sector 12 and 14) equipped [read
by new pads] + BME and BOE in the elevator holes of sector 13
extension of the offline identification schema (for BME and BOE),
extension of the range of RDO identifiable containers
1 RDO collection = 1 PAD fragment in the BS
heavy change of the cabling schema in sector 12, 13 and 14
deeper control of trigger, decoding and cabling packages achieved in the past few months
due to the need of implementing the changes necessary for the new RPC layout in RUN2
all legacy packages and services dismissed;
all HLT algorithms (LVL2 standalone-muon included) migrated to new packages and
standard geometry and cabling services
in the migration of the muon LVL2 algorithm the narrow road definition is now
obtained from a RPC-based pattern recognition (M. Corradi) instead of emulating
the LVL1 logic
RDO to xAOD by M. Kuna
Manpower (recently active): G. Chiodini, M. Corradi, S. Spagnolo
passing expertise (and sharing time-concentrated work-load) would be very useful
A lot of cleanup and maintenance to conform to new athena standards, code defects (from COVERITY scan) to be fixed
4
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING - SECTOR 12 AND 14
4 extra pads (in blue),
in a new configuration:
RPC hits on the 4th layer
used as pivot
and RPC hits on the 3rd layer
Sector 12 and 14
used as low-pt confirm R vs |z| view
Still today the firmware of these pads, G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo with input from C. Luci
do not number their CM as being low-pt
Cabling-map redefined in a unconventional way for these sectors
some software changes needed in the cabling software to cope with the new schema
consistency of the cabling schema verified in simulation; nominal mapping defined in fall 2014
detailed implementation of the mapping (i.e. using C. Luci hardware mapping) provided in January 2015
many exceptions need to be dealt in the cabling-correction-file to cope with hardware mapping optimisations
TO COME: extensive validation with data
5
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING - SECTOR 13
One extra pad, in a
standard configuration:
BME RPCs play the
standard role of pivot and
low-pt layers
BOE RPC plays the role of Sector 13
R vs |z| view
a high pt plane
G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo with input from C. Luci
Standard configuration; no software changes just a cabling-map update
However: special features of sector 13 are the different size in phi and the different number of phi strips of BME and BOE with
respect to the other chambers in the corresponding layer
consistency of the cabling schema verified in simulation; nominal mapping defined in fall 2014
detailed implementation of the mapping (i.e. using C. Luci hardware mapping) provided in January 2015
many exceptions need to be dealt in the cabling-correction-file to cope with hardware mapping optimisations
unsolved problems with the logical OR, may impact on LVL1 simulation for low pt configurations
TO COME: extensive validation with data
6
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING
Feedback from/to first data: ROB/ROD mapping mismatch in M7
M7 in the Offline RPC data are missing from side C all bottom sectors: ROD id 16-31, but Online
monitoring show RPC triggers also there
BS to RDO decoder was retrieving data based on ROB numbering, and assuming ROBid = RODid;
fix (make more robust) the converter to use RODid (recover data in the offline), but also fix the
hardware mapping of ROB-ROD which should have ROBid=RODid
G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo,
Rafal Bielski
input form R. Vari
7
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING
Feedback from/to first data: logic sector 23 and
27 (side C) missing in early M9 data [data set
important for muon alignment studies]
In early M9 data logic sector 22 and 26 were
masked for the readout but trigger data were
written (SL fragment)
the masking was somewhat inaccurate,
[SL footer missing]
in the Offline RPC data were missing not only
in sectors 22 and 26 but also in 23 and 27
the missing SL footer (of sectors 22 and 26),
i.e. BS format inconsistent with Decoder
expectations; the converter was not able to RUN 256385
recover when meeting the next PAD header
(from sectors 23 and 27)
After the fix data from sectors
fix: decoder behaviour now more robust
against missing SL footer; reprocessing 23 and 27 appear in the offline
the problematic data allows to recover
the missing sectors G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo, input form R. Vari
8
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC DATA DECODING AND MAPPING
Special decoding functionality for HLT
RPC seeded decoding at the EF
The EF muon reconstruction algorithm requests selected PRD collections in
the eta x phi region defined by the input ROI (a feature not exercised in RUN1)
methods available since ~2010; never validated to full details
Rafal Bielski, University of Manchester, (qualifying on decoding
optimizations for EF) validated the RPC seeded decoding for use in the EF
in RUN2
identified and fixed a few issues, but validated the original
implementation a temporary injection of
RPC ROB based decoding at the HLT (very effective) manpower
HLT (EF and LVL2) need pre-declaration of the ROBs involved with regional
data decoding
decoder functionality already there; Rafal Bielski implemented the required
mapping of PRD collections to ROBs for the EF needs in the RegionSelector
code
9
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015
RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY G. Chiodini
DQ Offline software running routinely at Tier0 in RUN1, one of the source of information for the
DQ flag assignment, and again since M7
non expert information: coverage, global distributions of efficiency, cluster size, noise, time
+ expert information, useful for detector problem identification
extended information available on demand
offline, private use on large data set (periods) to derive very detailed (per strip panel)
information: dead strips, panel, efficiency and cluster size, noise, strip-level offline time
distributions for offline time calibration
Recently updated to allow display and monitoring of the new chambers and PADS
First exercise on data already proved useful
CPU time and memory consumption understood G. Chiodini, N. Orlando
Upcoming Review of Muon Offline DQ after Easter
manpower (recently active)
Maintenance / code development: G. Chiodini (+ minor contr.s from S.Spagnolo so far)
Use in production for calibration purposes: G. Chiodini (+ minor contributions from
S.Spagnolo so far)
10
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY
Up and running since the re-start of data taking - a high statistics M7 run
G. Chiodini
11
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY COSMIC RUN 258398
M9 recent coverage almost complete: SL22, in sector 12, side C still disabled for
hardware problems
SL22
https://atlasdqm.cern.ch/webdisplay/tier0/1/express_express/run_258389/run/
MuonDetectors/RPC/Expert/Coverage/
12
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY COSMIC RUN 258398
SL22
13
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY COSMIC RUN 258398
RPC trigger selects mainly cosmic muons in the bottom sectors (time patterns ~
muons from collisions)
SL22
14
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC OFFLINE DATA QUALITY COSMIC RUN 258398
Trigger from TRT
RPC time per sector
cosmic muons in
Barrel A side top sectors have
RPC_tRPC
OFFLINE
DATA QUALITY
COSMIC RUN 258398
A shifter panel
Global Cluster
Size (LEFT)
Global Strip
Panel Efficiency
(RIGHT)
16
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC SIMULATION
Detector Description: S.Spagnolo
stable; implementation of new RPC in BOE/BME ~trivial, required only the extraction of the
appropriate primary numbers; new RPC in BME described as old RPC detector (2mm gas gap and
usual material distribution in the supporting layers) but new parameters for the strip panel description
Simulation (handling of Geant4 hit) unchanged: S.Spagnolo
for charged particles crossing the gas a SimHit is recordes holding entry-exit point in the gas gap,
track length, energy loss along the track, pdg-id of the particle crossing the gas gap
information currently not used
Digitization [from collections of SimHit from events at various bunch-crossing (emulating pileup) to a
collection of Digits=strips with signal over FE threshold and a time measurement in ns]
detector response emulation as for m.i.p., hence, efficiency (for m.i.p.) per gas gap and per strip panel
(eta and phi) and cluster size as measured from data G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo
can be set with strip panel granularity (if input come from detector performance measured on high
statistics samples and recorded in COOL) - average common values from Run1 used for MC15
Digits to RDO -> from signal on strips to signals in Coincidence Matrices G. Chiodini, M.Corradi, S.Spagnolo
involves cabling-model (encoding) and it is implemented through a very detailed simulation of the CM
hardware
this step naturally includes the emulation of the coincidence patterns in the CMs and in the PADs
Sector-Logic emulation [C. Corradi, A. Salamon] and input to MuCTP [outside RPC SW scope]
Manpower injection would be welcome 17
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015AN UPDATE ON DETECTOR DESCRIPTION: BOS A ETA +/-6
BOS a eta +/-6 are very peculiar:
dbZ=1 and 2 have different size in Z and different Z pitch in order to accomodate 32 eta strips each
In RUN1 layout (R.06) the chamber at dbZ=1 is shorter in phi, missing the first 8 phi strips, and the
support panel has a hole for MDT alignment rays (EC alignment system)
Still these features do not appear to be inconsistent between each other in the geometry DB/
implementation
unhealthy pattern in z residual between MDT segment
extrapolated to RPC plane and RPC hit M.Corradi
z residual z residual
abs. z, sector 1,
strip n. in BOS6
high pt plane
hole in eta strip n. is an artefact of the plot 18
S. Spagnolo Dic 19, 2014AN UPDATE ON DETECTOR DESCRIPTION: BOS A ETA +/-6
https://atlas.web.cern.ch/Atlas/GROUPS/PHYSICS/PAPERS/PERF-2014-05/
fig_08b.pdf
Not a pitch problem but a layout problem
solution, compatible with residuals, alignment
hole constraints [verified in the pit] has been
implemented (Jan 2015) in R.07.01
now in use in MC15
blue square = high scale factors in the regions with BOS6 S.Spagnolo
19
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC SIMULATION
Improvements for RUN2, i.e. MC15
Matching RPC Time in data and simulation G. Chiodini, M.Corradi, S.Spagnolo
prompt muons time in the RPC system
established in details for RUN2
20
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015Z->μμ skim of RUN1 DATA RPC SIMULATION
decoding according to old (RUN-1) software
G. Chiodini, M.Corradi, S.Spagnolo
RUN-1 data RUN-1 data
RPC BCid RPC tick
RPC PRD times in data were referred to
RUN-1data the origine of the RPC readout window
RPC time, in the RDO domain values for prompt muons ~arbitrary
and hardware dependent;
time of PRD in DATA so far
difficult to use for physical
considerations
RPC RPD times in MC were at the ~arbitrary time of ~9ns
21
S. Spagnolo RPC Software Meeting, Sep 15, 2014RPC SIMULATION
Z->μμ RUN1 MC overlapped to cavern background
test samples, useful to see the time structure G. Chiodini, M.Corradi, S.Spagnolo
RUN-1 simulation
digit times
RDO times
PRD time
of prompt
muon at
~9 ns
RPC readout window in MC was only 5 BC long 22
S. Spagnolo RPC Software Meeting, Sep 15, 2014G. Chiodini, M.Corradi, S.Spagnolo
RPC SIMULATION matching online time calibration
matching offline time calibration
In simulation:
digit time was fixed to be coherent with definition
readout window (in RDO emulation) enlarged to 8 BC, small
shift of BC0 w.r.t. BCid 3 implemented
MC15
PRD time = BCid x 25 + tick x 3.125 - BC0shift - 12.5 ns to
have prompt muon with t=0 by definition, both for data
and MC
DATA
MC15, no pileup
DATA
MC15, no pileup
23
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC LVL1 SIMULATION
M.Corradi
LVL1 simulation software:
PAD configuration now from job-option (from COOL in the future) - see (*)
A lot of cleanup and maintenance to conform to new athena standards, code defects (from
COVERITY scan) fixed and to be fixed
Hardware cabling schema derivation for Sector 13 (and a few years ago for 12 and 14)
simulation + digit production (before RDO) + dump in special validation ntuple (Athena based) for
several muon pT both charge signs G. Chiodini, S.Spagnolo (valid. ntuples)
for use of C. Luci
Trigger Roads derivation procedure: M. Corradi, S. Monzani
simulation + digit and RDO + dump in special validation ntuple (Athena based); production for
several muon pT both charge signs
study correlation of pivot and confirm channels
define for each CM a road containing hits from 90% of muons at the desired pT threshold
Current roads in COOL for MC15 M. Corradi, S. Monzani + L. Bellagamba and M. Verducci (COOL upload)
pt [GeV] = 4 6 10 (low pT) 11 15 20 (high pT)
for cosmic data threshold 4 and 11 are replaced by fully open roads both in phi and eta
in the new pads of the feet, the thresholds implemented are pt [GeV] = 4 ,10, 20 (this requires a
special configuration of the PAD, (*) mapping of CM thresholds to global set of 6 thresholds)
24
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC LVL1 SIMULATION M. Corradi, S. Monzani
from http://www.roma1.infn.it/~corradi/trigger_roads/strade_150227/plots_mu20/
a couple of NEW examples for mu20
Confirm channel
Confirm channel
η CM0, high pT
η CM0, low pT
pad2
PAD 5 PAD 2
Sector 12, sl0 Sector 13, sl0
μ+, μ-, geantino FEET μ+, μ-, geantino BME/BOE
Pivot channel Pivot channel
The green band is the trigger road, programmed to include the
simulated pattern of μ of both charge sign with pT = 20GeV
several special features in sectors 12-15, like discontinuous filling of CM
channels
25
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC LVL1 SIMULATION
from http://www.roma1.infn.it/~corradi/trigger_roads/strade_150227/plots_mu20/
M. Corradi, S. Monzani
φ CM0, low pT φ CM1, low pT η CM0, low pT η CM1, low pT
Sector 12, sl1, PAD4 - FEET
φ CM0, low pT φ CM1, low pT η CM0, low pT η CM1, low pT
Sector 12, sl1, PAD7 - FEET
26
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC LVL1 SIMULATION pad2 pad3
from http://www.roma1.infn.it/~corradi/
M. Corradi, S. Monzani
trigger_roads/strade_150227/plots_mu20/
φ CM0, high pT φ CM1, high pT η CM0, high pT η CM1, high pT
Sector 13, sl0, PAD2 - ΒΜΕ/ΒΟΕ
φ CM0, high pT φ CM1, high pT η CM0, high pT η CM1, high pT
Sector 13, sl0, PAD3 - ΒΜΕ/ΒΟΕ
27
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015LOOKING AT RPC SW VALIDATION FROM HIGH LEVEL QUANTITIES
MC validation (Muon HLT) Rel.20.1.3.2 MC15 e3099_s2579_r6172 Validation sample A
ATLAS-R2-2015-02-01-00
Simulation uses the layout with all
new RPC chambers,
BOS6 not yet fixed
HLT_mu26_imedium chain, T&P with Z->µµ
OFLCOND-RUN12-SDR-25
Digitization uses the almost final
implementation (nominal) of the new
RPC cabling maps
M. Aliev,
M. Primavera,
M. Reale,
A. Ventura
28
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CALIBRATION
F. Anulli, M. Corradi
Now processing ESD with RUN1 software
With collision data a MCP-MTSG common format "DESDM_MU*" will be used as input,
Time calibration slimmed and skimmed ESD (reco muons, hits on muon tracks, trigger info, muon HLT,
raw RPC and TGC data)
ONLINE RUN1 software to be migrated (ongoing effort) low man power area
a very fresh example from the cosmic RUN 258398 at http://atlasui02.na.infn.it:
8088/~l1mu/triggerroads/cosmics_2015/00258389.physics_IDCosmic/abs_timing.html
all hits (at the moment), check raw RPC time for online hits and trigger hits
online calibration (definition) aims at pushing the distribution of time for
prompt muons in BC3 and between tick 3 and 4, i.e. global tick 29,30
up down up down
TRT trigger
upper sectors
lower sectors
side C side A 29
ideal time for prompt muons from collisions
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CALIBRATION F. Anulli, M. Corradi
ONLINE Time calibration: looking CM by CM (example of sector 16, vs PAD, vs CM in
the pads and for groups of 16 channels in the CM)
outcome: calibration file for readout and trigger hits to correct delays in the pipelines
all hits, in low pt
mean time +/- RMS CMs of PAD2
[unit = tick]
Calibration constants converted into configuration parameters of
all hits, in high pt
CM / Pad /SL /Muctpi through a software which needs migration CMs of PAD1
Low manpower area
all hits, in low pt CMs of PAD2 all hits, in high pt CMs of PAD2 30
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CALIBRATION G. Chiodini
OFFLINE Time calibration https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/
tight muon selection, equalise RPC time for all hits AtlasPublic/MuonPublicResults
associated to muon tracks after correcting for signal
propagation time along the strip
outcome: extra calibration constants compensating
for limitations of the online time alignment
procedures
written in COOL DQMF folder for RUN1 / used
by slow particle search
can be read from COOL in new software to
calibrate PRD time
must first be extracted for RUN2
time of RPC hits associated to muons can be
further corrected for signal propagation time,
using the measurement of the “other” coordinate
(software tag to be validated) -> Muons can have
an associated time measurement, from the RPC
hits, as good as ~2ns in standard reconstruction
Calibration constant extraction based on Extended
Information from Offline DQ Raw PRD time (from online time calibration)
high statistics, private reprocessing needed Raw PRD time after correction for signal prop. time
Raw PRD time after offline time calib. and signal prop. time corr.
Manpower injection would be welcome 31
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CALIBRATION G. Chiodini
Manpower injection would be welcome
Gas-gap and strip-panel Efficiencies, Dead strips/strip-panels, Cluster Size
per strip-panel
Average over data periods or run-number intervals
Derived during RUN1 from Offline DQ software (with
extended functionality enabled) in private reprocessing
of DESD for Z->μμ skims
this program will be pursued during RUN2, for detector
condition monitoring and for possible use in MC
reprocessing injecting detector measured conditions
One example use case: feeding local eff. in MC
post MC11 test samples and 2011 data
32
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015a few software packages responsible
RPC CONDITION DATA for reading RPC condition data from SG when
available through the IoVDBSvc
All the information managed in COOL by Monica Verducci, summary information collected in a twiki
page:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/MuonConditionsTags
Cabling map and correction:
/RPC/CABLING/MAP_SCHEMA
/RPC/CABLING/MAP_SCHEMA_CORR
first nominal cabling maps for RUN2
current tag in use for M9
cabling maps for RUN2 from hardware maps
tag used in the validation sample for muon HLT
current tag in use for simulation
33
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CONDITION DATA
All the information collected by Monica V. in a twiki page:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/MuonConditionsTags
Trigger Roads
/RPC/TRIGGER/CM_THR_ETA
/RPC/TRIGGER/CM_THR_PHI
in OFLP200 on the OFFLINE server for the trigger simulation, and a not-used copy is present in the
CONDBR2 on the ONLINE server.
several tags used during RUN1
currently in use for MC15, includes all IOV relevant for RUN1
34
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC CONDITION DATA
All the information collected by Monica V. in a twiki page:
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/viewauth/Atlas/MuonConditionsTags
Detector measured performance in DQ Offline and offline time calibration
constants
The unique folder is in the OFFLINE server, in CONDBR2 and OFLP200 DBs.
One IOVs is present in each tag.
/RPC/DQMF/ELEMENT_STATUS
provided input to
digitization during RUN1 to reproduce panel by panel the status
(efficiency and cluster size) situation of the detector
slow particle searches on RUN1 data to correct the RPC times for
“offline time calibration constants“
currently not in use for MC15,
average common values of efficiency and cluster size from RUN1
read by python configuration - unknown local detector status in RUN2
35
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015TO DO LIST
Debugging with data new cabling maps in sectors 12-13-14
WARNING: Cabling Schema not easily extensible to non standard configurations
Complete migration of sw tools for online time calibration and check with data of trigger roads to
RUN2 Detector Performance analysis format
Streamline procedure for Offline DQ running for performance/calibration studies
Complete and validate procedure to apply RPC time calibration for all muon HITS
Digitization response to particle with charge ≠ 1
G. Gagliardi (search for exotic long leaved particles with fractional charge) waiting for this to
assess correctly systematics of the analysis
PAD configuration parameters from COOL
Write RPC BS error object (developed by N. Orlando in the past years) in SG to record RPC DAQ
errors o Status (DAQ status [disabled PADS] known directly from BS)
/RPC/DQMF/ELEMENT_STATUS (offline calib. const.) indexing in this COOL folder requires a re-
organization (currently using sw-release dependent strip/panel identifiers)
Detailed simulation of hardware/materials of new RPC
Run routinely low level performance studies to understand and accurately model RPC in Run2
36
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015BACKUP
37
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC DQ AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING WITH CALIBRATION STREAM
From raw calibration stream to D3PD
to ROOT ntuples
to Histograms
Luca Mazzaferro RPC TB 15 April 2014
38
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC DQ AND PERFORMANCE MONITORING WITH CALIBRATION STREAM
Luca Mazzaferro RPC TB 15 April 2014
39
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015RPC O FFLINE DATA QUALITY
RPC standalone tracks
COSMIC RUN 258398
small
large
eta eta
phi phi
low pT L0
low pT L1
pivot L0
pivot L1
high pT L0
high pT L1
40
S. Spagnolo RPC Mini-Workshop, Roma, March 26, 2015M. Aliev, M. Primavera, M. Reale, A. Ventura
Some trigger variables for Z->mumu sample:
Rel.20.1.3.2 MC15 r6172 Validation sample A
L1 Muon Trigger EF MuidCo TriggerHLT_mu26_imedium chain, T&P with Z->mumu
M. Aliev, M. Primavera, M. Reale, A. Ventura
Some trigger variables for Z->mumu sample:
Rel.20.1.3.2 MC15 r6172 Validation sample AHLT_mu50 chain, T&P with Z->mumu
M. Aliev, M. Primavera, M. Reale, A. Ventura
Some trigger variables for Z->mumu sample:
Rel.20.1.3.2 MC15 r6172 Validation sample AEXAMPLE OF OFFLINE NAMING dbZ=1
CONVENTIONS: high pT dbZ=2
plane
MDT
BOS AND BMS AT STETA=2, STPHI=3 removed
pivot plane
η low pT plane
dbZ=1
dbZ=2
dbZ=3
φ
dbPhi=2 dbZ=1
dbZ=2
dbPhi=1 44
MDT
removed
dbPhi=2
dbPhi=1
dbZ=1
dbZ=2
dbZ=3You can also read
