Rusk Junior High School - Rusk ISD
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
+
Rusk Junior High
School
2020-2021 037-907-041
Campus Plan
Total # of Students: 460
Total # of At Risk: 231 78 in 6th Grade; 85 in 7th Grade; 68 in 8th Grade totaling 231.
Percentage of At Risk: 50%
DATA AS OF 9-8-2020.
Regardless of the circumstance into which a child is born, we
will give them the best that can be offered!
We Learn……No Excuses
1RJH Cultural Philosophy
Mission – The WHY…..
Our mission is to encourage all students to reach their potential by providing the tools to
become self-sufficient. Regardless of the circumstance into which a child is born,
we will give them the best that can be offered!
We Learn….. No Excuses
Vision – What we aspire to become.
To combine relevant knowledge with real-world situations.
Values – Our Commitments….
We Believe…... that building relationships with students and staff that foster motivation, support and
teamwork is top priority.
We Believe…… we must create a caring and stimulating environment for maximum student success.
We Believe….. we must be positive, open minded, cooperative, friendly, and courteous to all we encounter.
GOALS for 20-21
What will be achieved?
Virtual Learning– To effectively develop a blended learning approach to meet the expectations in
our campus plan
Create and Maintain a Safe Environment – Implement safety measures to ensure safety for
everyone in the building
Refer to the RISD RETURN to SCHOOL Plan for all other expectations.
Evaluation Process
This plan is evaluated annually to determine the following:
1. Whether the academic achievement of at-risk students have improved;
2. Whether the goals and objectives contained herein were achieved;
3. If the plan remains relevant and appropriate as written.
2RJH Site Based Decision-Making
Organization
Instructional PLC’s + CIC+ Organizational Teams = School Leadership
Instructional PLC’s
1. Subject Level PLC
i.Composed of your teaching partner
ii. Purpose: To answer the 4 big questions and to establish a plan for intervention/enrichment.
iii.Meets multiple times per week as necessary
2. Grade Level PLC
i.Composed of anyone with a class from a specified grade level.
ii. Lead and communicate all activities focused around student learning. (i.e.celebrations,
coordinating instructional units, etc.)
iii.Meets 2 times per grading period as determined by facilitator.
Campus Improvement Committee
.Campus Level PLC (CIC –Campus Improvement Committee)
i.To guide the campus decision making in the following areas:
● School Organization
● Planning and Goal Setting
● Curriculum and Instruction
● Budgeting
● Staff Development
ii. Composed of Teachers, Office Leadership, Community, Businesses, and Parents.
iii.To implement our Value: We Believe…. That building relationships with students and staff that
foster motivation, support and teamwork is top priority.
Mrs. Besson– 7th Grade Teacher
Mrs. Hardy – 8th Grade Teacher
Mrs. Kellis – 6th Grade Teacher
Mrs. Garner– 7th Grade Teacher
Mr. Burkhalter -Principal
Tracy Sessions - Community/ Business Rep.
Pat Hardy – Parent Representative
Jaleea Hudnall – Community Representative
Robby Arrington – Parent Representative
Kathy Guidry - Assistant Principal
Organizational Teams –
3Until further notice as of 9-8-2020, all activities are subject to current restrictions. As restrictions are relieved, activities may resume. 1. AVID Site Team - Brian Williams - Leader i.To know and ensure the 11 Essentials are being accomplished ii. Completion of the ISS and CSS along with all Data Forms 1. DEIC (District Educational Improvement Committee) i.Be the voice of RJH at district level meetings ii. Coordinate the development of the Campus Needs Assessment iii.Work alongside Mr. Burkhalter in the compilation of the Campus Plan 2. GATES (GT Team) Anthony Garner - Leader i.Coordinate the Annual Parent Orientation (i.e. breakfast or evening meeting with program explanations and expectations) ii. Lead Field Learning Excursions to be selected from the 3 Year Cycle of Trips iii.Assist colleagues with enrichment strategies during TEAM, UIL, Robotics, etc. 3. Hospitality Team – Donna McCown– Leader i.Coordinate staff luncheons at least one per quarter. ii. To promote our VALUE: We Believe… we must be positive, open minded, cooperative, friendly, and courteous to all we encounter. 4. Sunshine Team – Nikki Cook - Leader i.Generate Smiles Often ii. Coordinate balloon, etc. deliveries to each staff member on their birthday and through announcements iii.Random workroom snacks monthly. 5. Spotlight Committee - Lauren Dyess - Leader i.Highlight and bring attention to a monthly celebration that are inclusive of but no limited to announcements, social media, guest speakers in classrooms, assemblies, lunch time events, etc. ii. Work with Student Leadership class to coordinate and delegate. iii.To post and advertise on bulletin boards, ENN, digital sign outside. 6. PPP (Positive, Promotion and Publication Team - Jennifer Lee - Leader i.We must not wait on others to tell the good news of our school. This team is tasked with seeking as many opportunities possible to spread the good news of our school to the community. (i.e. Social Media, Website contributions, Newspaper articles, ENN, digital sign outside, etc.) Collaboration Times 3:20-3:45, Planning Periods, “Team Time” Meeting dates and locations will be determined by each group. Leaders should have an agenda, sign in sheets, and minutes to submit to Mr. Burkhalter upon completion of the meeting. 4
Comprehensive Needs Assessment Summary
For School Year: 2020-2021
Area Data Sources Summary of Summary of Needs Team Members
Reviewe Reviewed Strengths Responsible for
d Monitoring
Strengths and
Needs
Priority Virtual Student Population Behavioral Foster and mentor our 1st Besson, Kellis,
#1 improvements of and 2nd year teachers. Hardy, Burkhalter,
Recruit, Retention of staff from 19- students Guidry
support, 20. Virtual Student
and retain Volunteer/ Community communication and
teachers Study of Staff/Student program participation participation
and Ratios
principals Library usage and book Time in the day to work
Study of compensation turnover rates with virtual students.
schedules
Virtual Methods to eliminate
Summative Reflections Communications Team zeroes among students.
Quick Checks Target (white) population
in Growth of Reading and
Student Success to end a
3 year cycle.
Number of applicants. Mentor Teachers More certified applicants Principal, PLC’s
for positions.
Priority Universal Screener Pre-Referral Process Refinement of our Reading Teachers
#2 Renaissance Data Reading RtI Program.
Build a Designated Support Administrative
foundation System Implementation of IXL Team
for reading Reading Data Rubric
and math. Behavioral Implementation of
Reading Plus Diagnostics improvements of Reading Plus with Tier 2
students and 3 students
Target (white) population
in % Meets/Masters to
end a 3 year cycle.
Math Universal Screener Numbers and Refinement of our Math Teachers
Renaissance Data Operations Interventions during
“Team Time” Administrative
Team
Math Data Rubric Algebraic Reasoning RtI Meetings for Virtual
Students
Quick Checks
Priority Master Schedule Creativity of lessons 1. To use Career Cruising Principal,
#3 more fluidly with our Counselor
Connect HS Administrative Behavioral students.
high Observations improvements of
school to students
5career and 2. To use the HS Planner
college. Implementation of HS in our Career Class in the
Classes offered to JH 8th grade.
students
6Math
Class of 2027 (6th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener, Renaissance Screener
12 students were at Masters Level
34 students were at Meets Level Current Reality
55 students were at Approaches Level
38 students were below 73% (101 /139 ) are approaching or higher as of
22 were virtual and would not test August after the closure in March of 2020.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
In 2021, 85% or more of the students will pass the
STAAR Math at the approaches level. Target Actual
85%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 85% 85%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
On STAAR or EOC Math, in 5 years, 85% of these students will be Target for Year 5
successful. 85%
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
7Math
Class of 2026 (7th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener, Renaissance Screener and STAAR results
16 students were at Masters Level
30 students were at Meets Level Current Reality
51 students were at Approaches Level
67 students were below 59% (97/164) are approaching or higher as of
20 were virtual and would not test August after the closure in March of 2020.
138/168 students are approaching or beyond grade level
expectations after the 1st round in 5th Grade.
No STAAR given in 6th Grade due to COVID Closure.
68 students are at the Meets level.
38 students are at the Masters level.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
Summative Assessments and Quick Checks
On STAAR Math in 2021, 75 or more students will meet
grade level expectations on the STAAR test and at Meets Target Actual
on the Renaissance EOY universal screener. 90%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 85% 90%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
On STAAR or EOC Math, 90% of the students will be successful. Target for Year 5
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
82% 90%
8Math
Class of 2025 (8th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener,
12 students were at Masters Level Renaissance Screener and STAAR results
27 students were at Meets Level
41 students were at Approaches Level Current Reality
41 students were below
10 were virtual and would not test 66% or 80/121 students were at the Approaches level
or higher on the Renaissance Universal BOY
In 6th Grade, 112/125 (90%) of the students are Screener.
approaching or above grade level expectations.
61% or 76/125 kids are meeting grade level
No STAAR given in 6th Grade due to COVID Closure. expectations as of last May 2019.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
Summative Assessments and Quick Checks
At the end of 8th Grade, this class will have 10 or fewer
students fail the STAAR test. Target Actual
90%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 85% 90%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
On STAAR or EOC for these students, 85% of them will be successful in 5 Target for Year 5
years. 85%
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y Y5
4
73% 79% 90%
9Strategies/Actions Person Funding Timeline Evidence of
Responsible Resources Success
Offer Algebra in 8th grade to Counselor General Summer of Master
address Question 4 of the PLC Hardy 2020 Schedule
process.
Vertical Department meetings Math Teachers General Quarterly After school
to implement common,
effective instructional
strategies.
Use of Reflex Math with Math Teachers General 2020-2021 Summative
teachers using STAAR format Assessments
for all assessments. Daily
Individualized Math McCown General Each quarter Growth reports
instruction for Tier III with progress
purposes monitoring
Focused Intervention with Math Teachers General Spring - after Google Doc
small groups and specific restrictions are with topics and
targets. lifted. names
Use of Get More Math for all Math Teachers General Each 3 weeks Get More Math
grades or more often Usage Reports
10Reading
Class of 2027 (6th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener, Renaissance Screener and STAAR results
32 students were at Masters Level
25 students were at Meets Level Current Reality
41 students were at Approaches Level 67% or 98/146 students were at the Approaches level
48 students were below or higher on the Renaissance Universal BOY
15 were virtual and would not test Screener.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
Renaissance Screeners and Summative Assessments
90% of the students will be at the approaches + levels on and STAAR
the 6th grade STAAR Reading test. Target Actual
80%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 85% 90%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
Summative Assessments
All of the students will be on a successful path to graduate HS. Target for Year 5
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
11Reading
Class of 2026 (7th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener,
32 students were at Masters Level Renaissance Screener and STAAR results
29 students were at Meets Level
58 students were at Approaches Level Current Reality
41 students were below
24 were virtual and would not test 74% or 119/160 students were at the Approaches
level or higher on the Renaissance Universal BOY
In 5th Grade 122/168 (73%) of the students are Screener.
approaching + grade level expectations on Round 1
testing. 70/168 (42%) met grade level expectations in 5th
No STAAR given in 6th Grade due to COVID Closure. Grade..
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
On the 2020 STAAR, 80% of the students will pass the
STAAR Target Actual
80% at Approaching
60% at Meets
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 80% 80%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
DMAC
In 5 years, there will be an 80% success rate for students on their STAAR or Target for Year 5
EOC. Decrease by year 5 to 5% that
are below grade level.
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
56% 61%
12Reading
Class of 2025 (8th Graders in 20-21)
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
Using the Renaissance BOY as the universal screener, Renaissance Screener and STAAR results
23 students were at Masters Level
27 students were at Meets Level Current Reality
43 students were at Approaches Level
28 students were below 77% or 93/121 students were at the Approaches level
10 were virtual and would not test or higher on the Renaissance Universal BOY
Screener.
In 5th Grade 100/134 (75%) of the students are
approaching + grade level expectations on Round 1
testing. In 6th Grade, 26% were at or beyond the Meets level
In 6th Grade, 76/125 (61%) of the students are on the STAAR Reading test. (32/125)
approaching or above grade level expectations.
In 7th Grade, due to COVID Closure, no STAAR given.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
On the 2021 STAAR Reading test, 95% of students will
be at or beyond the Approaches level. Target Actual
80%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
80% 80% 80% 80%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
By the beginning of their 11th grade year, all of the students will be on a Target for Year 5
successful path for graduation.
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
72% 71%
13Strategies/Actions Person Funding Timeline Evidence of
Responsible Resources Success
Target (white) population in % Reading Teachers General All Year Increase in % of
Meets/Masters in Reading STAAR and Principal our students in the
to end a 3 year cycle. Meets and Masters
categories for
Reading STAAR.
IXL - Implementation across the Reading Teachers General Monitor quarterly. Improve STAAR
campus scores through
practice and
mastery of
objective.
Improve reading fluency, Principal and General Invitation letter; Student interests
comprehension, listening skills, and Secretary Spring launch; and grades show
general self-confidence of students May - celebration improvement.
through the community volunteers,
who listen to students read and Delayed due to
interact with students one on one. COVID
restrictions.
Use of the Read and Write Toolbar V. Merchant General August 2020- May Use by teachers on
2021 summative
assessments
Pull targeted groups for Cook General Fridays Improved student
interventions for 6th Graders Norman performance.
Shuttlesworth
Intervention for all 7th and 8th students Stewart General First 3 quarters. Improved student
below grade 4 on universal screener. Burkhalter performance.
Hanrahan
Mrs. Ford
Mrs. Arrington
USE HMH Curriculum and Norman, Cook, General All Year in class. Improved student
Assessments as well as basic lessons for Shuttlesworth performance.
ELL students to meet needs as they
arise.
More passages with HOT questions. Norman, Cook, General All Year in class. Improved Summative
Shuttlesworth Assessment Scores.
Refined RtI program for Reading. H. Stewart General All Year Improved scores on
A.Burkhalter Universal Screener
Mrs. Ford
Use of Screencastify, Flocabulary and All ELA Teachers General All Year Improved scores on
Reading Plus to meet the needs of our Universal Screener.
students
Use of the KAMI Tool for Gen Ed. Teachers General Trial used in August All IEP
accommodations to be renewed accommodations met
September 1. with practice for the
digital STAAR.
14Writing
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
STAAR Results
In 4th grade, 89 of the 166 current 7th graders were
successful on the STAAR Writing in 2018.
Current Reality
89/166
54% were approaching or above grade level in
Writing in 4th Grade. 42/166 kids at Meets; 11 kids at
Masters
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR Results
By the end of their 7th grade year, 80% of them will be
demonstrate success on the STAAR assessment.
Target Actual
80%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
70% 70% 75% 80%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
In 2024, 80% of the students will pass the EOC. Target for Year 5
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
63% 66%
15Strategies/Actions Person Time Evidence of Funding
who Frame Success
Leads
Emphasis on capitalization and All classroom All Year Correct sentence structure General
punctuation in all content areas. teachers when writing sentences
and paragraphs.
Use of Kahoot, Brain Pop, Plickers, Language All Year Lesson Plans and General
Quizlet Live, & Quizizz as instructional Arts Teachers Administrative
technology tools on the Chromebooks. Observations
Teach methods of writing geared toward English All Year Quickcheck data General
STAAR prompts with emphasis on Teachers Summative data
grammar
Utilize Scholastic Action, Empowering 6th & 7th All Year Administrative General
Writers, & Writing with Power. Grade Observations
English
Teachers
Disaggregating of information through English All Year Student Schedules General
7th grade PLC will assess needs of Teachers
individual students for effective
instructional purposes. Counselor
Targeted Intervention with specific English All Year Google Doc with names General
students on specific needs. Teachers of students pulled and
tasks to be accomplished
in the Spring semester.
Use of tactile games. English All Year Improvement on General
Teachers Summative Assessments
16History
History Department
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
STAAR Results
The current 8th graders have never been assessed on
History. Therefore, the baseline data will be off of their
Reading STAAR results from spring of 2019 with no Current Reality
STAAR given in 2020 due to the COVID Closure.
90% of them passed the Math STAAR in 6 th Grade
61% of them passed Reading STAAR in 6th Grade. as well.
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR Results
By the end of their 8th grade year, 80% of them will
demonstrate success on the History STAAR assessment.
Target Actual
80%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitor Monitoring?
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
Summative Assessments
70% 70% 75% 80%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
All students will have passed their EOC exams and be on a path to be a Target for Year 5
successful graduate.
Actual Gr. Level %
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
53% 61%
17Strategies/Actions Person Time Evidence of Funding
who Leads Frame Implementation
Refer to the Important Dates of History Harmon, Monitor Observation General
Cards posted in all rooms McClure, each
Williams Quarter
Sponge and Warm-up activities will be Harmon, All Year Administrative General
directed toward STAAR objectives. McClure, Observations
Williams
Extended and intensified instruction will History All Year Lesson Plans and General
be implemented using the resources teachers Observations
available in the Library and on Internet.
Disaggregating quick check scores Harmon, All Year DMAC results General
McClure,
Williams
Teach major events & people of 1607 – 6th and 7th All Year Lesson Plans and General
1865 + Reconstruction in 6th & 7th grade Grade History Observations
SS & TX His. classes Teachers
Utilize the TEKS Resource website to History All Year Lesson Plans and General
implement effective assessments and Department Observations
strategies.
3 or more Project Based Learning History Quarterly Lesson Plans and General
opportunities. Teachers Observations
Use of the digital textbook to increase History All Year Completion of General
accessibility for virtual students. Teachers assignments
Monitor attendance closely to ensure Teachers/ All Year Attendance reports General
students remain successful Attendance
Clerk/ AP
18Science
Science Department
PLC Team Baseline Data Data Source
STAAR Results
In 5th grade (2017), 76% of the current 8th graders were
successful at the Approaches level.
Current Reality
100/132 students Approaches in 5th Gr. Science 2017
50/132 students Meets in 5th Gr. Science 2017
13/132 students Masters in 5th Gr. Science 2017
PLC Team Performance Measure (1 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR Results
By the end of their 8th grade year, 80% of them will be
demonstrate success on the STAAR assessment.
Target Actual
80%
Q1 Progress Q2 Progress Q3 Progress Q4 Progress Data Source for Quarterly
Monitor Monitor Physics Monitor Earth Monitor Monitoring?
Chemistry Force & Motion and Space
Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual Target Actual
71% Summative Assessments
70% 70% 70% 80%
PLC Team Performance Measure (5 Year Goal) Data Source
STAAR
To have 90% of students successful on their test. Target for Year 5
90%
Actual
Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5
73% 85%
19Strategies/Actions Person Time Evidence of Funding
who Frame Implementation
Leads
Remediation for targeted students. DMAC Science 20-21 Improved summative General
data and lesson plans will be continually Teachers quarterly assessment scores.
evaluated. along with
entire
grade level
PLC
Increased lab time with hands-on Science 20-21 Students will see more General
experiences targeting STAAR objectives Teachers quarterly relevance to what they
where students scored lowest according to are learning which
quick checks. enhances their
performance.
Intensive STAAR Reinforcement through 8th Grade May 2020 All 8th grade students General
Science Day in May of 2021. Horizontal rotate through tested
PLC TEKS stations.
Data driven intervention during class, after 8th Gr. 20-21 Mini checks during General
school, or during TEAM time if available. Science quarterly TEAM to test
Teachers understanding at a
75% mastery.
Offer individualized tutorials before and/or 8th Gr. 20-21 Mini checks to test General
after school. Science quarterly understanding at a
Teachers 75% mastery.
Reteach as a whole the lowest scored 8th Gr. 20-21 Quick Checks General
TEKS. Science quarterly
Teachers
Use Fitness Gram data to study Heatlth/PE 4th Quarter Fitness Gram General
charts/graphs and improvement with body teachers
systems
20Other Areas of RJH
Strategies/Actions Person Funding Time Evidence of
Responsible Frame Implementation
Resources
Parent and Family Virtual General All Year Virtual
Engagement Communication Communication
Contact families frequently Team Tool
creating a welcoming
environment given COVID McCown, Ford,
restrictions. Alford
Discipline Discipline General All Year Reduced number of
Goal: Management referrals as
To reduce the overuse of Officer (Asst. compared to the
discipline practices that Principal) previous year as
remove students from the observed in the
classroom PIEMS reports at
Strategy: the EOY.
Implement the delivery of
teacher consequences at
Level One. Team will
deliver consequences at
Level Two.
21Staff Morale Principal General All Year Smiles and laughter
Goal: among staff with a
To maintain a positive staff trust among each
morale with a family other that exudes a
atmosphere in our building. Office Team healthy family
atmosphere.
Strategy:
1.Conduct a
weekly/biweekly needs
assessment and find
resolution. 2.Sunshine
Committee Goodies
Violence Prevention and Counselor General All Year Few disciplinary
Intervention referrals as
1. Character meetings with Assistant compared to
Huddle Groups with the Principal previous year.
OLWEUS program.
2. Discipline Management Principal
System
3. Proactive and preemptive
measures in all classrooms
by all staff.
Transition from Middle to Counselor General All Year 8th grade students
High School are engaged and
1. 8th Grade Parent Night in enrolled in a
Spring successful HS plan
2. 8th Grade Scheduling for the next school
Seminar year.
3. Career Cruising
4. Use HS Planner in the
Career Class
22You can also read
