RESPONSIBLE INVESTMENT QUARTERLY - Q1 2019 - Columbia Threadneedle Investments
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 CONTENTS 01 Foreword................................................3 02 Portfolio Manager Viewpoint...................4 03 The future of food: eat or be eaten........7 04 Benelux – RI Spotlight..........................12 05 Vale’s Brumadinho dam collapse – the tip of the tailings iceberg?............. 17 Stewardship in action 06 Voting Q1.............................................20 07 Engagement Highlights.........................21 2
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 01 Foreword We have also had one eye firmly annual member survey of the UN PRI fixed on the fast-developing provides an opportunity for us to effect backdrop provided by the European a ‘stocktake’ of our activities and Commission’s Sustainable Finance review what constitutes current and Package. The draft proposals emerging best practice in responsible emanating from the European investment. This year’s survey has Commission foreshadow significant been no less exhaustive than those reform. At the core, there is a welcome gone by but, by keeping our heads up acceleration for the consideration and maintaining focus on supporting in investment practice of issuers’ our clients in achieving their objectives, environmental, social and governance we ensure that our overall investment risk performance, but there is plenty process remains robust. more besides. Funds marketed in Europe and aligned to the specific National and regional developments Iain Richards continue as well. Whilst the UK’s Head of Responsible Investment delivery of environmental objectives appear likely to be subject to increased Prudential Regulation Authority levels of scrutiny. Managers of (which oversees banks and mainstream funds meanwhile may find insurers) has recently become the their performance benchmarked to first regulator globally to publish a The first quarter of the year is a time supervisory statement on climate ESG-adjusted indices. Given that the to prepare for the year ahead, refining risk for consideration, the Benelux impact has potential to be as broad plans to address strategic priorities and region remains a notable centre for and significant as that introduced allocating resource to ensure we are responsible investment activity. under MIFID II, we continue to monitor well positioned to execute on these. A summary note of recent events in the situation extremely closely to In March, we launched our own RI the region, including as regards the ensure we are ready to react to the ratings system that harnesses our issuance of sovereign green bonds, final recommendations given that they company’s data science and technology is provided later in this report. appear likely to materialise in the form capabilities to provide a forward-looking of Delegated Acts. Of course, other nations have moved to rating that combines an assessment of a company’s financial stewardship Client interest in ESG continues to issue sovereign green bonds in recent with a view on how well it manages its grow rapidly at the same time and years but many major economies are environmental, social and governance notwithstanding the potential impact yet to do so. We can only hope that risks. Our equity portfolio management of the EU agenda we remain focused the increased focus on RI that is soon teams have been using the tool since on helping all our clients, old and new to fall across the EU will provide the late 2018 and it is being rolled out to alike, to implement solutions to meet sovereign green bond market the boost our fixed income investment teams their particular needs in responsible it so badly needs. during the course of this year. investment. Our response to the 3
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 02 Portfolio Manager Viewpoint Nicolas Janvier Ann Steele Portfolio Manager, Senior Portfolio Manager, US Equities European Equities Our proprietary responsible How do the ratings help you Are there specific themes/issues analyse your portfolio/better in your portfolio, or in any given investment ratings is research potential companies sectors, that you might pay closer an innovative tool that to invest? attention to as a result of the ratings tool? combines ESG and financial Nicolas Janvier: The RI ratings Nicolas Janvier: We approach RI from stewardship data to create represent another source of potential alpha. They help portfolio managers a holistic perspective and there are no a single company rating for (PMs) and analysts to better focus on specific issues of concern. Where the 5,500 listed equities globally. crucial responsible investing topics that tool has been particularly useful is in need to be addressed when interacting giving us a greater understanding of So how do our PMs use it? with companies and their management a company before we speak to them, teams. The back-testing that has with particular regard to their carbon been performed gives us confidence footprint among other risk factors. that the ratings will help us find those companies that are better positioned to For example, portfolio managers and deliver sustainable future cashflows. analysts can now use the tool to quickly understand what a company’s 4
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 risk factors are and analyse its carbon understanding of the risks as well By contrast, our RI ratings focus on the footprint so that we can then prepare as the knowledge and opportunity most material ESG issues as well as questions from a more informed to drill down further to establish accounting and financial stewardship standpoint. where a company’s future cashflows models. They use frameworks agreed might be going. by industry experts and supported by The unique model combines academic research; likely outcomes financial stewardship with ESG How do the ratings improve can be derived from robust back- factors to arrive at a single portfolio management? testing. company rating between 1 and 5. Ann Steele: A company’s financial Why do you think this combination Are there specific themes or sustainability is linked to the is beneficial to the analysis of the issues which the ratings have sustainability of its business model companies you invest in/would like highlighted to you? and the quality of its management. to invest in? Ann Steele: Climate-related risks are Nicolas Janvier: The 1-5 ratings RI ratings provide evidence of this – highlighted in more than 90% of the scheme is consistent with our approach back-testing shows that better-rated industry models within the RI ratings. to both fundamental and quantitative companies outperform and worse-rated We analyse complimentary data, for ratings and is easily understood by underperform. The ratings give us a instance carbon emissions and water PMs and analysts. Traditional models consistent, detailed dataset to assess intensity, as this helps us optimise generally focus on one component, but the quality and sustainability of the portfolio management, meeting clients’ our model incorporates all potential risk companies we hold. These concepts objectives, as well as helping us factors to the sustainability of future – quality and sustainability – lie at the monitor and report to clients. cashflows. heart of our approach. The logical and necessary evolution is to include RI Will you use the ratings as part Will you be using the ratings as factors in the analysis. of a risk management toolset? part of your risk management What is the particular advantage in Ann Steele: The ratings help us in toolset going forward? the combined nature of the ratings the risk discovery process. They are Nicolas Janvier: We have fully – looking at both traditional ESG insightful not only for fund management integrated the RI ratings into our metrics and financial stewardship? but across other areas of our business, approach to research and portfolio for instance portfolio and risk construction, and we think of ESG risk Ann Steele: The third-party ESG monitoring. in the same way as we think of risk to ratings originated in a vacuum and the income statement or the balance are not designed to help investment Clients and regulators are increasingly sheet. We consider these risks to decision-making. Material ESG issues focused on this area, and there be part of the holistic analysis and – the ones most likely to drive a share is an underlying dynamic at play. understanding of the future direction price – are often clouded by peripheral Sustainability-related risks increasingly of a business. Integration is key. distractions or legacy controversies. shape economic reality. Investment They don’t address the quality and firms with the awareness and Ultimately, the RI ratings are an prudence of accounting and capital information to anticipate them will additional tool that allow me to perform management: these fall outside be best placed for the future. my role more effectively, rather than traditional ESG analysis but are key differently. They give me a greater to the stewardship of a business. 5
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 03 The future of food: eat or be eaten Ben Kelly Jess Williams Senior Thematic Analyst, Portfolio Analyst, Responsible Investment Responsible Investment Key to Future Prosperity and related non-communicable diseases) In terms of global GDP, the share from or indirectly such as goals 13 Climate agriculture, forestry and fishing is Development Action, and 15, Life on Land (given the relatively modest at 3.5% globally, but The food value chain is vital to the impact of global farming on emissions this masks a considerable range – for success of many economies, global and forestry). instance for low income countries this financial markets, and sustainable is over 25%.2 When related areas such Figure 1: Food-aligned SDGs as food staples, retail and services are development. taken into account – the impact of the Thus UN Sustainable Development food value chain to the global economy Goal 2, Zero Hunger, emphasises the is of course much greater. importance of nutrition, food security and sustainable agriculture to global This picture is similar for financial development and prosperity.1 markets, which are not only impacted Whilst other goals also relate to food to food through asset classes such as either directly such as 14, Life Below Commodities but also through exposed Water (which includes a focus on areas within conventional asset sustainable fishing), 3, Good Health classes. For instance, we estimate and Wellbeing (given the rise of food- that around 7% of the most commonly Source: UN. 7
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 used global equity index, the MSCI All nnDemographic growth increases it is estimated that at global warming Country World Index, are exposed to pressure: it is expected that there of 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels food related health and nutrition issues will be around 10 billion people on (the most conservative and ‘best case’ through their business models.3 the planet by 2050, around a 30% estimate of future warming), 35 million increase from today.6 people would be exposed to crop yield changes. At 3°C (increasingly seen a Critically Challenged nnThe health impact of food is BAU scenario) this is expected to be increasingly of concern: one in Yet our food systems are facing eight adults are obese and 8.5% 1.8 billion.8 fundamental changes and challenges have diabetes.7 on multiple fronts. Yet agriculture is exacerbating the Given these challenges, there is a problem. It is estimated that agriculture nnClimate change poses risks to critical need for not only greater risk and land use has accounted for global food and health: In 2017 awareness, but innovation, and scaling 24% of Global GHG emissions, and alone, climate-related disasters up of alternative models and improved dairy & cattle around 40% of this caused acute food insecurity for practices. We explore three of the total.9 At a time of increasing drought c.39 million people across 23 challenges and solutions. risk, agriculture is also the largest countries.4 consumer of the Earth’s available nnUnsustainable past practices freshwater: 70% of “blue water” threaten the future: Nearly 1/3 of Sustainability Challenges withdrawals from watercourses and fish stocks are overfished and 1/3 Current food systems are both groundwater are for agricultural of freshwater fish species assessed threatened by and a threat to usage.10 are considered threatened.5 environmental shocks. For instance, 8
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Technology & Innovation Inari – focused on developing climate markets, have sugar taxes in place. resilient, less resource intensive, and Sugar is not the only area of focus, Importantly, new models and more nutritious crops. with growing concerns raised about techniques can help reduce the impact the overconsumption of meat. of agriculture on the environment – including those offered by investable Health & Consumers This was one of the key findings of companies. Another challenge faced by the food the EAT-Lancet Commission on Food, value chain, is around health and Planet, & Health – formed of over One avenue is through the use 30 world-leading scientists, which nutrition, and related shifts towards of precision techniques: farm quantitively describes a reference diet. alternatives especially in developed management based on observing, The findings showed the need for a markets. measuring and responding to substantial increase in consumption conditions, with the goal of optimizing For instance, greater understanding foods such as vegetables, fruits, whole returns while preserving resources. of the relationship between sugar grains, and a decrease in consumption Through offering these solutions, consumption and lifestyle diseases of red meat, sugar, and refined grains in US firm Trimble helps improve farm – from obesity (now impacting one in order to provide major health benefits, yields by up to 30% whilst concurrently eight adults) to diabetes (which has and also increase the likelihood of reducing water use by up to 20%.11 risen threefold over the past 15 years) attaining the Sustainable Development The Lancet Commissions – has catalysed a range of policy shifts Goals. Strikingly, they found that One new development addressing and consumer demand for healthier globally meat consumption was over climate impact is from the Dutch alternatives.13 Now 28 countries, 2.5x the recommended amount, whilst company DSM, which has developed across developed and emerging in North America this was over 6x.14 a feed additive for cows that reduces internal fermentation and hence their methane emissions by 30%.12 Figure 2: Overconsumption: an issue in all geographies Despite the pockets of innovation wher within public markets, many of the Red meat The news solutions are being developed inclu by start-ups of varying size and focus. Starchy vegetables folat These range from Californian Indigo incom Eggs (a late stage Venture backed by The that Investment Corporation of Dubai or fo Poultry amongst others, developing crops ribofl capable of surviving climate change) We Total dairy to Small Robots Company (a small, UK relat based and equity crowdfunded firm Fish (tabl aiming to replace much of the work asses done by tractors with a series of highly Vegetables cons accurate, smart, lightweight robots). cons Fruit Region pork Harnessing the potentially disruptive Global nuts East Asia Pacific power of these private businesses – Legumes South Asia obes whether through investing in them or Sub-Saharan Africa disea Whole grains Latin America and Caribbean partnering with them – is an area which Middle East and North Africa an ag larger companies will need to explore. Europe and central Asia conn Nuts North America One example is Campbell Soup which mort has launched its own VC fund Acre 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 from Venture Partners, investing in new 2016 dietary intake versus reference dietary intake (%) (appe agricultural business models such as refer Source: Figure 1: Food Diet ingap thebetween Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet dietary patternsCommission on reference in 2016 and healthy diets fromintakes diet sustainable food systems. of food year Data on 2016 intakes are from the Global Burden of Disease database. The dotted line represents intakes in 130 reference diet (table 1). Us 9 assu Percentage Number Comments and f Colla
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Whilst demand for sugary products and premium functional drinks featuring The question remains as to whether red meat has persisted to date, the ingredients such as turmeric, matcha more traditional companies have the accelerating demand for alternatives is and collagen.17 Similarly General Mills capacity to evolve at sufficient pace, even more striking. For instance, plant- has developed a venture arm 301 Inc, and whether or not they will contribute based food sales growth was 10x that specifically identifying emerging brands towards the achievement of the UN of all food sales growth in 2018 in the usually with a specific health angle SDGs by their 2030 deadline. US.15 Whilst a recent survey the UK, (such as plant-based meal and snack 45% of shoppers were actively looking company Urban Remedy).18 for healthy snacks and 41% want snacks with less sugar.16 Conclusion This poses a risk for companies As the impacts of climate change, with less healthy product lines and natural resource constraints, health portfolios, particularly in a digital era and new consumer demands, increase when the barriers to entry for insurgent – companies will need to continue to brands are lower than ever. Yet some innovate and adapt. companies have responded proactively to these shifts. Unilever, for instance, Harnessing new technologies, has 26 sustainable living brands (which proactively looking for alternatives, are healthier and/or more sustainable) and staying close to regulatory and Sources: which have delivered 70% of its recent consumer shifts will be increasingly 1 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg2 sales growth. Examples include organic critical for public companies. 2 https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.AGR. TOTL.ZS?year_high_desc=false food and tea brands as well as their 3 CTI 17 April 2019, drawing from data provided by We have identified some specific, MSCI ESG Research recent acquisition: The Vegetarian investable opportunities with solutions 4 World Economic Forum, Global Risk Report 2019 Butcher. Other interesting developments 5 FAO report on Biodiversity, 2019 to enhance the sustainability and 6 UN include the acquisition of WhiteWave health of our food systems. Mainstream 7 WHO by Danone – giving them access to 8 FAO financial markets can already play a plant-based alternatives – and even 9 IPCC. Barclays role in supporting these as they seek 10 https://www.globalagriculture.org/report-topics/ Amazon’s diversification into healthier water.html to scale up, broadening their impact. food retail through Wholefoods. 11 https://www.trimble.com/Corporate/RCC/Our- Solutions.aspx For established companies, however, 12 https://www.dsm.com/corporate/science/climate- Here venturing has also been pursued these challenges are risks to business energy/methane-reduction.html as a strategy, especially by those with 13 WHO as usual. Some proactive companies 14 https://www.thelancet.com/commissions/EAT less healthy portfolios. For instance are further ahead in mitigating these 15 Sugar, fat, salt and Obesity HSBC, Feb 2019 Coca-Cola has ventured into the 16 Sugar, fat, salt and Obesity HSBC, Feb 2019 issues – and evolving products and company behind Dirty Lemon – a 17 https://dirtylemon.com/ practices which form part of the 18 htps://www.foodbev.com/news/general-mills-301- direct-to-consumer brand which offers inc-leads-17m-investment-urban-remedy/ solution. 10
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 11
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 04 Benelux – RI Spotlight Jess Williams Prosper van Zanten Portfolio Analyst, Head of Benelux Responsible Investment The Netherlands’ plans to issue History of Innovation financial instruments and now has its inaugural sovereign green bond an approximate 50% market share (expected May 2019) provide further The Benelux region leads by example of listed green bonds.20 In addition, underpinning, as if it was needed, in terms of furthering its sustainable the LGX has started an initiative to for the longstanding interest in finance ambitions, having developed facilitate and streamline access to responsible investment across the wide ranging practices. One of the Chinese domestic green bonds listed Benelux region (Belgium, Netherlands, most prominent innovations is the on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Luxembourg). That said, if local leaders Luxembourg Green Exchange (LGX), or traded on the Chinese Interbank are serious about maintaining this launched in 2016. The LGX is a Market. This is a much-needed bridge; leadership position, now is not the time dedicated platform, launched and whilst the market has very different to be resting on laurels; with the EU’s maintained by the Luxembourg Stock operating standards (most notably in Technical Expert Group on Sustainable Exchange, for green securities that terms of disclosure), it will nonetheless Finance due to publish its findings meet eligibility criteria closely aligned be a key player in achieving the in the near future, the rest of the with ICMA’s Green Bond Principles.19 ambitions of the Paris Agreement. European bloc will soon be catching up. The Luxembourg Stock Exchange was the first listing authority globally to introduce such a platform for green 12
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Sustainable Bonds account for two out of a global total Labelling of 11 sovereign green bonds (18% of Companies registered in the Benelux the sovereign green bond universe) A further innovation from Luxembourg is region have (at the time of writing) which is particularly remarkable given the LuxFlag suite of labels for financial issued over 60 labelled bonds (green, that the region accounts for only products which provide the end social or sustainable). Of these ~1.5% of global GDP.22 Aside from consumer with assurance around the bonds, the majority are from Dutch its sovereign green bond, Belgium products’ non-financial goals. Currently issuers such as TenneT and NWB, has also been a prominent issuer of LuxFlag provides three accreditations: respectively a transmission system sustainability bonds. Sustainability the ESG Label, the Microfinance label operator focusing on renewables bonds are bonds that finance a and the Climate Finance label. Febelfin, and a Bank particularly focusing on mix of green and social projects. the Belgian federation of the financial financing the Dutch water boards. A notable Belgian issuer is The sector, is also in the process of In fact, the Netherlands was the 5th Flemish Community, a regional authority designing an ESG accreditation which largest issuer of green bonds in 2018 in Flanders, whose sustainability bonds is expected to launch in the Autumn issuing a total of $7.4 billion over aim to finance: energy efficiency in of this year. The ‘eco label’ concept the course of the year.21 Belgium’s buildings, affordable housing, access has been picked up by the EU in its existing sovereign green bond and to education and pollution prevention sustainable finance action plan, where the Netherlands’ anticipated issuance and control. retail investors are again the center in May 2019 will see the region of attention. 13
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Impact and the capital markets. Although still responsible investment shows no in its infancy, MIVs having emerged signs of wavering, a recent example The question of measuring the impact as a viable instrument only 15-20 being the Dutch Pension Funds of investments is currently at the years ago, the market looks set to Agreement on Responsible Investment forefront of responsible investment. grow substantially given the increasing which was signed by over 70 pension The central bank of the Netherlands, interest in impact investing. funds with $1.4 trillion of assets in DNB, along with several large Dutch December 2018. We look forward to investors has developed a system seeing what initiatives will emerge in for mapping impact indicators to the A blueprint for Europe? the region in 2019. UN Sustainable Development Goals With the EU Sustainable Finance (SDGs). The indicators allow investors action place high on the horizon, we to assess how their investments Sources: believe that the Benelux region may 19 International Capital Markets Association and loans contribute to the SDGs soon face some stiff competition from 20 https://www.greenlit.lu/luxembourg-green- and therefore start to gauge their exchange/ other EU nations in terms of promoting 21 https://www.climatebonds.net/files/reports/ impact, the end goal being to scale up responsible investment. That said, the cbi_gbm_final_032019_web.pdf sources of investment that deliver a 22 Statista commitment of the Benelux finance 23 http://www.impactinvestingguide.com/impact- measurable contribution to the SDGs. industry to fostering and growing investing-microfinance/ SDG impact mapping is a theme that we have also been focusing on at Columbia Threadneedle Investments Figure 3: MIV % total assets where such analysis now forms part of our evaluation process in social bond strategies. 16% Switzerland 34% Microfinance 5% Netherlands Outside of the traditional capital Germany markets, the Benelux region is a 8% USA major hub for inclusive finance. Over 20% of the market for Sweden Microfinance Investment Vehicles 16% Other (MIVs)23 is domiciled in the region. These MIVs act as a link between 20% multilateral financial institutions, who on-lend funds to the end recipients, Source: Impact Investing Guide. 14
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 15
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 16
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 05 Vale’s Brumadinho dam collapse – the tip of the tailings iceberg? The frequency of these disasters in expected to bring additional risks, as Brazil, along with the tailings collapse changes in rainfall may lead to less at Mt. Polley in Canada in 2014, has predictable conditions and changing placed a renewed spotlight among water levels within the dams which investors, companies, and civil society may affect their stability. on the underlying risks which tailings dams present, particularly when they are located near to local populations Improved safety standards and environmentally sensitive areas. and disclosure are needed The risks remain even where dams In this context, we welcome the are no longer in active use, as was the request, spearheaded by the Church case in Brumadinho, where Vale had of England Pensions Board and applied for a license to decommission Sweden’s Council on Ethics, to call Olivia Watson the facility. for improved disclosure by extractives Senior Analyst, There are estimated to be at least companies of the tailings facilities Responsible Investment 3,500 active tailings dams around the they operate or control. The proposed world, as well as dormant facilities. creation of a new, and independent, The large number of legacy dams, standard to assess tailings dam safety built over the last century to contain in the context of their location and the The collapse of the tailings dam mining wastes, have varying degrees impact of a failure would also be a at Vale’s Córrego de Feijão dam in of construction standards and record helpful development. The initial Brumadinho, Brazil in January was keeping surrounding their design positive response from several large a tragedy on a massive scale. and the environmental conditions at extractives companies has been As of April 2019, over 220 people the time of their construction. welcome. have been confirmed to have been Safety standards and disclosure Although we have a relatively small killed, and nearly 70 people are still are also variable. exposure to the mining sector, we missing following the collapse. These latent risks have been have reviewed our extractives holdings Beyond the immense human toll, compounded by the increasing across equity and fixed income. it is clearly concerning for Vale to volumes of tailings being produced Over the coming months we will be experience such a significant disaster by the extractives industry – as engaging with companies around their so close on the heels of the 2015 remaining minerals and ores are disclosures on tailings facilities and collapse of the dam at Samarco, becoming more difficult to extract, the steps companies are taking to which was operated as a joint a larger quantity of tailings waste is ensure safety standards. venture between Vale and BHP. produced, leading to more, and larger, dams. Climate change is 17
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 The Brumadinho case Vale plans to manage an increasing In prior years we have voted against proportion of future tailings through the re-election of non-executive In the aftermath of the dam collapse dry processing, rather than tailings directors whom are not independent. in Brumadinho, we spoke with Vale dams. This will reduce health, safety In 2019 we voted against the financial to understand more about their initial and environmental risks, but is not statements as a result of concern on response to the disaster, including a sufficient measure given the large the lack of adequate risk management their emergency management number of legacy dams that will remain. and disclosure. The responsible response, their initial investigations, investment team and relevant PMs and the certification processes which We also took part in a collective and analysts will continue to monitor the dam had undergone. We felt that investor call with Vale, and the investigation and to engage with the company’s appointment of an we welcomed the company’s the company on the results of the independent expert committee to acknowledgement that significant investigation and the actions it plans investigate the causes of the failure governance and organisational to take as a result. It will be important is a positive step. While we await the changes will be needed to rebuild trust. to continue to work alongside other findings from the committee later The issues at Vale are compounded by investors, and we will continue to this year, the reports in the media the significant lack of independence engage with the company collectively surrounding allegations as to the on the board. A lack of independent through the group investor dialogue status of the dam and safety lapses scrutiny of safety measures adopted facilitated by the PRI. are clearly of significant concern. in the wake of Samarco may have contributed to the failure to foresee the disaster at Brumadinho. 18
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 STEWARDSHIP IN ACTION Columbia Threadneedle Investments While analysing meeting agendas and the issuers in which we have views an integrated approach to and making voting decisions, we large holdings – based on either stewardship as an integral part of its use a range of research sources monetary value or the percentage responsible approach to investment. and consider various ESG issues. of outstanding shares. The RI team makes final voting We vote actively at company decisions in collaboration with There are many companies meetings, applying our principles the firm’s portfolio managers and with which we have ongoing on a pragmatic basis. We view this analysts. Votes are cast identically engagements, as well as a number as one of the most effective ways across all mandates for which we that we speak to on a more ad hoc of signalling approval (or otherwise) have voting authority. basis, as concerns or issues arise. of a company’s governance, management, board and strategy. All our voting decisions are available We actively participate in We classify a dissenting vote as for inspection on our website seven several investor networks, which being where a vote is cast against days after each company meeting. complement our approach to (or where we abstain/withhold engagement. Along with other from voting) a management-tabled We engaged with numerous investors, we raise market and proposal, or where we support a issuers throughout the quarter. issuer-specific environmental, social shareholder-tabled proposal not In prioritising our engagement work, and governance issues, share endorsed by management. we focus our efforts on the more insights and best practice. material or contentious issues 19
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 45 40 38 35 Number of meetings voted 7 30 06 Voting Q1 30 26 25 20 19 15 17 15 31 12 10 9 10 11 11 6 5 5 5 4 4 0 Asia United Europe North Japan Latin Pacific Kingdom ex-UK America America ex-Japan Dissent from at least one item Support Management on all items Between January and March 2019, we voted at 130 Figure 5: Proportion of dissenting votes per category meetings across 22 global markets. 96 of these were 2% 1% annual general meetings, 32 special meetings and two 3% 2% Directors bondholder meetings. Of the 130 meetings, we cast at Other business least one dissenting vote at 66 (51%). 12% Remuneration Figure 4: Meetings voted by region Capitalisation 45 Audit related 14% 40 38 51% Reorganisations and 35 mergers Number of meetings voted 7 30 30 Supporting shareholder 26 resolutions 25 16% 20 19 Antitakeover 15 17 15 31 Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments, ISS ProxyExchange, 31 March 2019. 12 10 9 10 5 11 11 6 5 We did not support 133 individual voting items throughout 5 4 4 the quarter, the majority relating to directors’ elections 0 Asia United Europe North Japan Latin and executive pay. Two votes were also cast against Pacific Kingdom ex-UK America America ex-Japan management recommendations in support of shareholder proposals. Dissent from at least one item Support Management on all items Source: Columbia Threadneedle Investments, ISS ProxyExchange, 31 March 2019. We voted in 22 separate markets in the first quarter. Most meetings 2% were voted 1% in the UK (30), followed by South 2% Directors 3% (17), the US (16), India (14), Japan (10) and Brazil (6). Korea Other business 12% Remuneration Capitalisation Audit related 14% 51% Reorganisations and mergers Supporting shareholder 16% resolutions Antitakeover 20
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 07 Engagement Highlights In the first quarter, we engaged with Specific environmental focus Rentokil Initial plc, Sika AG, SimCorp the 62 issuers listed below, some on Total SA A/S, Spirent Communications plc, multiple occasions. SSP Group plc, Standard Chartered PLC, Specific social focus Stock Spirits Group plc, Ted Baker PLC, Environmental, social and governance Becton, Dickinson & Co. Thai Beverage Public Co., Ltd., Vectura discussions Group plc, Weir Group plc, XP Power Ltd Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Applus Specific governance focus Services SA, Britvic Plc, Breedon Barclays plc, British American Group plc, Brunello Cucinelli, Tobacco plc, Burberry Group plc, Case studies Continental AG, Croda International plc, Cargotec Oyj, Coats Group plc, Cobham plc, Cognex, Crest Nicholson The following case studies describe Deutsche Telekom AG, easyJet plc, Holdings plc, CRH plc, Domino’s ESG-focused engagement led by Edenred, Evonik Industries AG, Pizza Group plc, Elementis plc, Epiroc, members of the RI team. Iberdrola, Innogy SE, Kingspan Group plc, Koninklijke Philips, Korian, GlaxoSmithKline plc, Greene King plc, Lar Espana Real Estate Socimi SA, Howden Joinery Group Plc, IMI plc, Mondelez International, National Imperial Brands PLC, Informa plc, Grid plc, Nintendo Co. Ltd., Nordea ITV plc, London Stock Exchange Bank AB, Pennon Group plc, Schneider Group plc, Pearson plc, Pernod Ricard, Electric SE, Vale S.A. Prudential plc, Rathbone Brothers plc, Becton Dickinson, USA, Health Care Equipment Social, strategy nnAccess to healthcare, and good ESG management, highlighted as core to Becton Dickinson’s business model. Sustainability an increasingly important issues for their employees – considering sustainable pension plan options. They have a proactive approach to new EU medical regulation, which will be material. They must produce new evidence for some products and relabel others. nnIssues around litigation are considered as part of due diligence around M&A activity. Potential cash flow impacts for 8-10 years are considered alongside the natural life span of any impacted products. nnCyber risk is an important issue with a direct report to the CFO. They examine business relationships based on cyber risk e.g. banking. The company was caught in the WannaCry attack but updated customers in 24 hours and fixed the issues within 48. The company continues to work with the FDA on best practice. 21
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Brunello Cucinelli, Italy, Textiles Environmental and sustainability, social, strategy nnWe held a call with the company’s Director of Investor Relations and Corporate Planning during the first quarter to discuss a number of material ESG issues. We concluded that the quality of the company’s ESG risk management does not appear to be reflected in its external reporting and therefore not captured in ESG data. nnAll production takes place in Italy, rather than developing countries, mitigating supply chain risk. The company values its close relationship with direct suppliers. Circa 340 ‘Artisan laboratories’ – with no subcontractors – produce the company’s goods and are paid 20% more than the market rate. nnThe company also has a close relationship with its raw material suppliers and can trace cashmere and cotton to their origin. The company’s growth plans avoid supply chain stress or loss of brand exclusivity. nnBrunello Cucinelli is the company’s founder, majority owner, chairman and CEO. Positively, his succession was openly discussed. He, along with all senior management, are subject to both a long-term and short-term succession plan. easyJet, UK, Airlines Strategy, Brexit nneasyJet believes it is well-prepared for Brexit. The referendum result led to a structural change at the company, with a new European airline set up in Austria. With 40% of its flights intra-Europe, monitoring and preparing for Brexit developments has been a huge draw on resources. Brexit-related activities have dominated the CEO’s first year. nnWhen former CEO Carolyn McCall left, the board realised the succession plan wasn’t good enough. This has been an area of focus and there has been significant change at the senior management level; the new team is establishing itself. nnThe company highly values its workforce and has good relations with the c20 unions – it was last affected by industrial action in 2016. nnThe company have been working more with data, including establishing an organisational temperature chart to identify where resources should be focused. Though flight punctuality was worse this year, customer satisfaction levels increased. 22
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Greene King, UK, Beverages Governance, human capital nnWe discussed changes to the governance structure resulting from the departure of the CEO, including succession and transition plans, and remuneration proposals. We noted that the pension arrangements for the incoming CEO have been reduced as compared to his predecessor. nnWe also discussed board and senior management diversity. A new non-executive director has been appointed, bringing the level of female representation to 25%. The company recognises that further work is needed to address gender diversity at senior management level. nnWe discussed the company’s ongoing efforts surrounding employee engagement, including among pub management. There has been some improvement in employee metrics including engagement and retention rates, and the company has formalised an employee liaison role within the Board. Total SA, France, Integrated Oil & Gas Environment and sustainability, strategy nnWe attended Total’s results and climate strategy presentation. The company has set a 15% GHG reduction target for operational emissions (Scope 1 and 2) for 2025, which we welcome as a positive step. The company emphasized that they have a number of cost-neutral options to meet the target, including a focus on natural gas, efficiency improvements, and their low-carbon electricity business, among others. nnThey believe with their 3 strands of oil, gas and low-carbon electricity that the company will be able to adjust as climate policy tightens. The company is making small investments in R&D into carbon capture and storage, looking at potential to commercialise this in the North Sea if carbon prices increase, as well as biofuels, and carbon sinks (forest carbon credits). nnWe note that future executive compensation will also include targets aligned with emissions reductions, and we will await the detail of these. 23
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Breedon Group, UK, Construction Materials Environment and health and safety, strategy nnBreedon Group is a construction materials firm based in the UK and Ireland focussed on aggregates, and more recently, cement. nnWe spoke with the company about their strategy and expansion plans, including the outcomes following the acquisition of Lagan, an Irish construction and cement business. We also discussed how company culture is maintained and how safety standards are addressed and maintained following acquisitions. nnWe discussed the increase in the company’s injury rate during the year. This is above their target, though it is not significantly out of range as compared to peer companies. The increase appears to relate to an increase in minor accidents. nnWe also discussed sustainability reporting and plans to improve disclosure in the future. As an AIM-listed company, disclosures on many ESG issues such as GHG emissions are lacking as compared to larger peers. The company has recently joined the Global Concrete and Cement Association and will improve its reporting in line with requirements. We will continue to engage with the company in this area. Pennon Group, UK, Water Utilities Environment and sustainability, strategy nnPennon is a UK based utility group focused primarily on water and wastewater services and waste management. nnWe spoke with the company about their environmental strategy, given the growth of their GHG emissions in recent years, which has resulted from an increased focus on Energy Recovery Facilities (ERFs) alongside landfill, within their waste management business. nnThe company is modelling its future carbon emissions and developing a group level carbon strategy, which will include 3-year targets. The company is also seeking to improve its CDP rating. nnThe company has community consultation programmes and liaison groups surrounding planned and existing ERF facilities. Community concerns have resulted in delays to the planning process for some new facilities, particularly those sited near to urban areas. nnWe encouraged the company to report on its other air emissions, particularly those from ERFs, outside of detailed reporting to the Environment Agency. They are seeking a common reporting format to be adapted across the sector. 24
Responsible Investment Quarterly – Q1 2019 Alexion Pharmaceuticals, USA, Pharmaceuticals Business ethics, human capital, governance nnAlexion is a US pharmaceuticals company focused on the development of therapies for rare autoimmune and cardiovascular diseases. It has recently undergone a restructuring and a headquarters move from Connecticut to Boston, as well as investigations around business ethics and marketing practices. nnWe discussed corporate culture and employee engagement following the reorganisation. The company’s ‘net promoter score’ an indicator of employee engagement, has increased significantly following the office move. The company plans to increase their disclosure around employee issues in the future and will produce a separate sustainability report. nnIn relation to business ethics, the Code of Ethics has been expanded, and all employees now have compliance/integrity related goals linked to compensation. This had led to some positive changes in corporate culture and it was noted that the ‘tone from the top’ has had a stronger focus on integrity. nnOn the issue of board diversity, the company will publish a board skills matrix which will include gender and ethnicity and will be used in board composition discussions. We noted that although only 20% of the board is comprised of women, over half of the senior management team are women. Mondelez, USA, Food and Beverage Strategy, remuneration, nutrition nnMondelez is a global food and beverage company focused primarily on snack foods including chocolate, biscuits, and gum. nnFollowing the release of their updated strategy in late 2018, we discussed the focus for their next phase, including consolidation into core product lines and a focus on high growth geographies with a more decentralized structure. nnWe also discussed shareholder concerns around executive pay in 2018, and their plans for remuneration in 2019 including changes to the peer group comparison for the CEO. nnWe sought their views on how ESG issues such as health and nutrition might affect the company, given consumer trends and the greater focus on regulation and sugar taxes in many markets. We discussed how these trends are overseen and discussed by the Board, as well as some of the changes that have been introduced to improve the nutritional profile of some of the company’s products. 25
To find out more visit COLUMBIATHREADNEEDLE.COM EMEA.Stewardship@columbiathreadneedle.com US.Stewardship@columbiathreadneedle.com RI.Thematic@columbiathreadneedle.com Important Information: For internal use by Professional and/or Qualified Investors only (not to be used with or passed on to retail clients). Your capital is at risk. Past performance is not a guide to future performance. The value of investments and any income is not guaranteed and can go down as well as up and may be affected by exchange rate fluctuations. This means that an investor may not get back the amount invested. The analysis included in this document has been produced by Columbia Threadneedle Investments for its own investment management activities, may have been acted upon prior to publication and is made available here incidentally. Any opinions expressed are made as at the date of publication but are subject to change without notice and should not be seen as investment advice. Information obtained from external sources is believed to be reliable but its accuracy or completeness cannot be guaranteed. This document is not investment, legal, tax, or accounting advice. Investors should consult with their own professional advisors for advice on any investment, legal, tax, or accounting issues relating to an investment with Columbia Threadneedle Investments. The mention of any specific shares or bonds should not be taken as a recommendation to deal. This presentation and its contents are confidential and proprietary. The information provided in this presentation is for the sole use of those attending the presentation. It may not be reproduced in any form or passed on to any third party without the express written permission of Columbia Threadneedle Investments. This presentation is the property of Threadneedle Investments and must be returned upon request. This document includes forward looking statements, including projections of future economic and financial conditions. None of Columbia Threadneedle Investments, its directors, officers or employees make any representation, warranty, guaranty, or other assurance that any of these forward looking statements will prove to be accurate. Issued by Threadneedle Asset Management Limited. Registered in England and Wales, Registered No. 573204, Cannon Place, 78 Cannon Street, London EC4N 6AG, United Kingdom. Authorised and regulated in the UK by the Financial Conduct Authority Columbia Threadneedle Investments is the global brand name of the Columbia and Threadneedle group of companies. columbiathreadneedle.com Valid from 05.19 | Valid to 09.19 | J29388 | 2552400
You can also read