REPORT - Rotterdam Convention
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
REPORT
Consultation for Portuguese-speaking African Parties (Angola, Cape
Verde, Guinea- Bissau, Mozambique, São Tomé and Principe) under
the Rotterdam Convention on the social and environmental impact of
pesticide use
Lisbon, Portugal 1-4 December, 2015
1|Page
Table of Contents
Background .................................................................................................................................................................3
Participants .................................................................................................................................................................4
Structure of the workshop – Outputs and Outcomes ................................................................................5
Objectives of the meeting ......................................................................................................................................6
Summary of the meeting........................................................................................................................................6
Summary of the key actions identified by the countries ....................................................................... 10
Key Recommendations to the Secretariat ................................................................................................... 12
Annex I - Workplans of the Five Lusophone countries .......................................................................... 14
ANGOLA – Ações chave .............................................................................................................................. 14
CABO VERDE - Ações chave ..................................................................................................................... 15
GUINÉ-BISSAU - Ações chave .................................................................................................................. 16
MOÇAMBIQUE - Ações chave .................................................................................................................. 18
S. TOMÉ E PRÍNCIPE - Ações chave ...................................................................................................... 19
Annex II - Agenda................................................................................................................................................... 22
Annex III – List of Participants ......................................................................................................................... 26
2|Page
Background
The consultation for Portuguese-speaking African countries (Angola, Cape Verde,
Guinea- Bissau, Mozambique, São Tomé and Principe) aimed at initiating a dialogue
across Parties and (Non Parties- Angola) with similar environmental and social
concerns in the framework of Rotterdam Convention and the other two Chemicals
Conventions, Basel and Stockholm.
The consultation aimed at facilitating the identification of potential elements of a
national strategy for RC implementation and pesticides management, based on the
needs and gaps discussed during the consultation with the key stakeholders.
The integrated approach of Rotterdam Convention aims at focusing more and more
on the work with rural communities under article 6. This article assists countries in
detecting problems encountered at level of human health and the environment with
specific formulations and raise awareness at global level. It is a key piece of
information sharing for Parties that are experimenting similar problems with similar
conditions of use of a certain formulated chemical.
The work with the rural communities aims at connecting normative work with the
field level and at tackling social and environmental impact caused by pesticides use
and by the presence of other hazardous chemicals.
Rotterdam
Convention
Informed
Promoting Collect
alternatives to
Decision disaggregated
pesticides use making data
process
Basel, Stockholm
and Rotterdam
Conventions
Overall, involved countries are members of the Community of Portuguese-Speaking
Countries (Comunidade dos Países de Língua Portuguesa - CPLP), an important
multilateral forum for deepening mutual friendship and cooperation on different
topics. In particular, CPLP has approved in 2012 a Regional Strategy for Food and
Nutrition Security (ESAN-CPLP), with Priority 1 “Strengthen governance of food
security and nutrition”, Priority 2 “Promote access and utilization of food to improve
the livelihoods of the most vulnerable groups” and Priority 3 “Increase availability of
food based on small producers”. Therefore this consultation also aimed to strengthen
fruitful collaboration within this framework.
Moreover, since some countries are Small Island Developing States (SIDS) the
workshop was also aligned with the recommendations expressed during the Third
International Conference on Small Island Developing States (SIDS) and the strong
3|Page
commitment towards SIDS shown by FAO over the last months in relation of
combating climate change and foster local actions for mitigation and adaptation.
Sustainable Development Goals
SDG Strategic Objectives, ESAN-CPLP
9, 12,13,
15 SO2 and SO3
Regional Strategy Country Programming Framework
for Food and
Post-2015
Nutrition Security
UN Angola ,Cape Verde, Guinea- Bissau, Mozambique, São Tomé
Developme SIDS-Small Island and Principe
Developing States
nt agenda
Participants
The Consultation for Portuguese-speaking African Parties under the Rotterdam
Convention on the social and environmental impact of pesticide use was attended by
17 participants from the five Lusophone countries, including representatives from
Ministries of Agriculture, Environment, Health and NGOs in order to build the basis
for a technical network and raise awareness on the social and environmental aspects
of pesticide exposure and deal with the topic in a holistic manner to have more
harmonized technical assistance activities. Moreover, six resource persons and
facilitators attended the meeting: Elisabetta Tagliati, Inma Roda Martin and Nadia
Correale from the Rotterdam Convention Secretariat in FAO, Ivy Saunyama from the
FAO SFS Sub-Regional Office for Southern Africa, Sheila Willis from Pesticide Action
Network (PAN-UK), and Mirian de Oliveira from the Ministry of the Environment of
Brazil. Manuel Lapão of the Community for Portuguese-Speaking Countries (CPLP)
also joined the consultation. Jaime Ferreira, president of AGRO-BIO (Organic
Association of Portugal) made a presentation during the field visit at Quinta do
Arneiro. The FAO Representation in Portugal, in particular Ana Muller, supported all
the process. The full list of participants is in Annex III.
4|PageStructure of the workshop – Outputs and Outcomes
Getting familiar with:
- SDGs, BRS and Chemicals
Exchange information among Lusophone
- Food security, Rotterdam Convention and countries on national status of
Agriculture production implementation of RC as well as on the
- Regional Strategy for Food and Nutrition experience on social and environmental
Security (ESAN-CPLP) and linkage with impact of pesticide use
sustainable agriculture and the social and
environmental impact of pesticide use.
Art. 6 SHPF - Social and Environmental
Impact of pesticide use and Decision making
process
Implementing the key obligations of
- Pesticide poisoning and vulnerable groups
Rotterdam Convention: Article 5, 10, 12
- Brazilian experience on social and
National Breakout groups
environmental analysis
- SAPREF – sub-regional experience in
implementing Rotterdam Convention
Getting familiar with practical
experience with non-chemical Alternatives to the use of pesticides:
alternatives to chemicals in the Quinta
do Arneiro - Video on alternatives to pesticides
Get introduced to the organic - Farmer Field School –Integrated Pest
certification through the presentation Management - experiences in Africa - successful
made by AGRO-BIO (Association of stories and gaps
Organic Agriculture)
Identification of key actions, steps forward and deadlines!
Technical assistance activities planned on social and environmental
impact of pesticide use
OUTCOMES:
- 5 work plans with key actions identified during the discussion of these days, setting short/medium
term with key players/institutions, crops-pesticide dichotomy, obligations under RC, identification
of possible rural communities, request to the Secretariat
- Report with Recommendations to the Secretariat
- Establish sub-regional Lusophone Network, formal and informal
- Enhancing social and environmental approach to pesticide management
5|PageObjectives of the meeting
The workshop objectives were:
Reinforce Rotterdam Convention and its implementation (art 5, art 10, art 12, art
6)
Build a Lusophone network at sub-regional level
Community based approach for collecting disaggregated data on social and
environmental impact of the use of pesticides (art. 6)
Develop national action plans and collect requests for technical assistance on
social and environmental impact of pesticide use and recommendations for
Secretariat
Introducing possibilities to link normative work to field level work (non-chemical
alternatives to pesticides, FFS- IPM, agro-ecological approach, organic
agriculture)
Summary of the meeting
In the opening session at the CPLP Headquarters, Elisabetta Tagliati of the Secretariat
of the Rotterdam Convention welcomed all the participants and thanked them for
their attendance to the consultation for African Lusophone countries. After that, all
the participants and the resource persons introduced themselves (country of
provenience, institution and role) in order to facilitate the discussion of the four days
and get to know each other.
The workshop objectives, approach and structure have been presented by Nadia
Correale with the scope to give the idea to the participants on why we were gathered
in Lisbon and how we would have worked during the four days.
Elisabetta Tagliati framed the work, presenting the relevance of social and
environmental sustainability for pesticide risk reduction and introducing the relation
of working with chemicals and the SDG agenda. Linked to this, a video titled Detox
Planet about chemicals, POPS and the consequences on human health and the
environment was shown during the workshop.
The work in synergy of the three Conventions Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm was
introduced by Elisabetta Tagliati that, after an introduction on the role of the
Rotterdam Convention in food security and sustainable agriculture, gave the floor to
Mr. Manuel Lapão, Cooperation Director of CPLP and in charge of the Regional
Strategy for Food and Nutrition Security (ESAN-CPLP) who gave a presentation on
the ESAN-CPLP and its linkages with the social and environmental impact of pesticide
use and sustainable agriculture.
The afternoon session was dedicated to the Lusophone countries: one representative
for each Lusophone African country made a presentation on the national situation
regarding pesticide management regulatory framework; status of implementation of
Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide use and experiences in
non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM, biopesticides etc):
6|Page Paula Cachacha of the Ministry of Agriculture of Angola
Anélide Leinice Querido Fernandes of ADAD (Associação para Defesa do
Ambiente e Desenvolvimento) of Cape Verde
Pedro Correia Landim of the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development of
Guinea-Bissau
Angelina Marissol Woderych da Silva Manhiça of the Ministry of Health of
Mozambique
Darnel Baía of the General Directorate of Environment of São Tomé and
Principe
After the presentations of the African Lusophone countries, in the framework of the
Community of the Portuguese-Speaking countries, the Brazilian representative,
Mirian de Oliveira, gave a presentation on the status of implementation of the
Rotterdam Convention in her country.
The following day, presentations on the key provisions of the Rotterdam Convention
(art. 5, art.10, art. 12,) have been delivered in order to give to the participants an
overview of the benefits and obligations under the Convention. Discussion on plenary
sessions and breakout groups have been organized based on a tables that had been
previously distributed and identified actions to be taken in order to prepare a work-
plan to be consolidated the last day.
The last piece of information from the RC Secretariat was presented on the Article 6:
Severely Hazardous Pesticide Formulations (SHPF) proposals as an opportunity for
developing countries and economies in transition that experience environmental and
human health problem linked to pesticides.
Sheila Willis of PAN UK (NGO) presented the experience in Former Soviet Union
countries, explaining the key concepts on pesticide poisoning and on data collection
and pesticide exposure of vulnerable groups. The possibility to adapt the
methodology to Lusophone countries has been also stressed.
Mirian de Oliveira, Ministry of Environment of Brazil, presented the experience of
Brazil in social and environmental analysis and the national experiences with GEF
project.
Ivy Saunyama from FAOSFS, in the framework of regional cooperation and decision
making process, presented the Southern African Pesticide Regulators' Forum
(SAPReF) and the experience in implementing Rotterdam Convention: background
and history, organizational Structure -membership; achievements, Strategic Action
Plan, focusing on successes in implementing the Rotterdam Convention and
presenting other opportunities for strengthening implementation of the RC.
On the third day all the delegates from the countries as well as the resource persons
participated at field trip in the Quinta do Arneiro in the metropolitan area of Lisbon
to visit an organic farm. Participants got familiar with the non-chemical alternatives
to pesticides used in agricultural production through a practical experience and
understood the food value chain from the production to the distribution. Jaime
7|PageFerreira, president of the AGRO-BIO (Association of Organic Agriculture of Portugal)
explained the concepts of organic agriculture and the procedure for obtaining the
organic certification.
Figure 1 - Jaime Ferreira (AGRO-BIO) during its presentation
Figure 2 - Participants visiting Quinta do Arneiro
8|PageFigure 3 - Group picture at Quinta do Arneiro
After the practical experience at Quinta do Arneiro, Sheila Willis from PAN-UK
introduced the project carried out in collaboration with Rotterdam Convention on
“Growing coffee without endosulfan”
To give an idea to the participants of the work of FAO on the alternatives to pesticides
and sustainable agriculture, Ivy Saunyama raised awareness on Integrated Pest
Management (IPM) and Farmer Field School (FFS), highlighting some case studies in
Africa and the environmental and social impacts of these experiences.
The last day was dedicated to the identification of key actions and priorities at
national level and at sub-regional level as African Lusophone countries as follow up
of the discussions in plenary as well as in break out groups of the previous days. The
key actions identified by the Lusophone countries set short/medium term priorities
with key players/institutions, crops-pesticide dichotomy, obligations under RC,
identification of possible rural communities. Key recommendations to the Secretariat
have been also presented.
Moreover, the Secretariat had the chance to participate at the opening ceremony of
the exposition for Organic Agriculture in Portugal in the presence of the Luis Capoula
Santos, Minister of Agriculture, and Helder Muteia, FAO representative in Lisbon,
Portugal and Jaime Ferreira, president of the AGRO-BIO (Association of Organic
Agriculture of Portugal).
9|PageSummary of the key actions identified by the countries
ANGOLA
In relation to the Rotterdam Convention implementation, Angola identified as
priorities actions the ratification of the Rotterdam Convention; the need of adequate
legislation and required assistance in risk assessment;
As for the alternatives to the use of pesticides, the country focused the attention on
promoting Integrated Pest Management and Farmer Field School projects; in training
extension workers in the field of use of alternative and raising awareness of managers
and users to reduce pesticide use
CAPE VERDE
In the legislative framework, Cape Verde put the emphasis on improving the national
legislation based on evidence collected at national level, , on promoting the reduction
of Rotterdam Convention/POPs chemicals and on improving Customs and monitoring
of entry of chemicals.
Other key actions identified by Cape Verde put emphasis on collecting data and
mapping the impact of pesticides at social, environmental and health level with
the involvement of the National Institute of Statistics, Ministry of Health,
Environment Directorate and FAO as well as the promotion of alternatives to the
use of pesticides.
GUINEA- BISSAU
Guinea Bissau key actions focus on drafting national legislation on chemicals set out
in Annex III of the Rotterdam Convention and on RC implementation strategy at
national level for avoiding risks from the use of pesticides and an impact on health.
Also, emphasis is placed on establishing rapid mechanisms for detecting pesticide
poisoning cases, through an effective capacity building of health personnel and
creation of ad hoc structure with the involvement of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural
Development, other ministries and the support of FAO.
A specific reference is made to the collection of information on alternatives to
chemicals use.
MOZAMBIQUE
Mozambique identified as priority actions the collaboration with neighbours
countries for strategy on pesticides transit/trade in the region (Mozambique is the
only country that has published the list of banned pesticides).
Also, it has been stressed the need to remove DDT from informal market.
As for the alternatives to the use of pesticides, special attention is placed on
providing a list of bio pesticides used for pest management and FFS experiences.
10 | P a g eSÃO TOMÉ AND PRINCIPE
São Tomé and Principe put special attention on the need of drafting national
legislation on the management of chemicals that can regulate the import and export
of pesticides in the country as well as the creation of a database for pesticide
management. Also, the preparation of a national plan for rapid response to
environmental emergencies in the country that can potentially cause accidents with
hazardous chemicals. The collection of data of national situation was suggested in
order to base decisions on evidence.
As for the alternatives to the use of pesticides, focus on strengthening the capabilities
of CIAT (Center for Agronomic and Technological Investigation) and CATAP (Agro-
Pastoral Advanced Training Centre) as well as capacity building programs on non-
chemical alternatives.
11 | P a g eKey Recommendations to the Secretariat
ANGOLA
• Assistance in the legal instrument
• Technical assistance with regard to risk assessment
• Establish institutional cooperation on pesticide management process
• Capacity building, training and awareness raising for all the stakeholders
involved in the pesticide management
• Strengthening capacities for import control
CAPE VERDE
More resources for NGOs to conduct activities taking into account the
insularity of the country (FAO, NGOs, Ministry of Rural Development, Ministry
of Environment, Housing and Land Use planning)
Enforcement: Strengthening national capacities
Training the DNA on FRAs forms under the Rotterdam Convention
Partnership: Encourage the development of financial mechanisms and
partnerships and national and international institutions (FAO, Ministry of
Rural Development, Ministry of Environment, Housing and Land Use planning,
national and international partners)
GUINEA- BISSAU
Strengthening national capacities on formulation and records in terms of
customs, inspectors and other structures (training of customs and inspectors
on pesticide import control)
Training the DNA on FRAs forms under the Rotterdam Convention
Development of a strategic framework for awareness raising and training of
all relevant stakeholders involved in pesticide management
Adapt materials in Portuguese
MOZAMBIQUE
Training on Notification of Final regulatory Actions form and Import
responses form under the Rotterdam Convention
Strengthening capacities for custom controls of chemicals listed in Annex 3
Awareness raising of the retailers and consumers (farmers), about the dangers
of illegal sale and misuse of chemicals.
12 | P a g eSÃO TOMÉ AND PRINCIPE
Training the DNA on IRs and FRAs forms under the Rotterdam Convention
Capacity building activities for national stakeholders in pesticide management
with the involvement of FAO and NGOs
Capacity building programs on non-chemical alternatives (bio pesticides, FFS-
IPM)
Improving data collection on pesticides
BRAZIL
• Technical assistance on article 5 on final regulatory actions and article 12 on
export notifications under the Rotterdam Convention
13 | P a g eAnnex I - Workplans of the Five Lusophone countries
ANGOLA – Ações chave
1 – Panorama Nacional
A falta de uma legislação adequada e a ratificação da convenção condicionam
de certa forma as ações referentes a implementação da Convenção.
Não existe uma política de colaboração entre instituições relativamente a
gestão de pesticidas.
Não existe uma base de dados referente a problemas de intoxicação por
pesticidas.
São utilizadas algumas alternativas aos pesticidas mas não de forma
generalizada nem foram alvo de uma investigação científica.
2 – A nível da implementação da Convenção de Roterdão temos as seguintes
prioridades:
Ratificação da Convenção de Roterdão;
Legislação adequada;
Assistência na avaliação de riscos;
Alternativa ao uso de pesticidas
Promover a Gestão Integrada de Pragas
Adoptar projectos de Escolas de Campo
Capacitação de extensionistas
Capacitação dos extensionistas em matéria de uso de alternativas
Sensibilização dos gestores e utilizadores para a redução do uso de pesticidas.
Prazos – 2016-2017
RECOMMENDATIONS
Apoios
Intervenção do Secretariado da Convenção na localização do Instrumento
jurídico
Assistência técnica no que concerne a avaliação de riscos
Estabelecer políticas de colaboração institucional no processo de gestão de
pesticidas
Reforço da capacidade de controlo das importações
14 | P a g eCABO VERDE - Ações chave
Legislação
Melhoramento e divulgação da legislação nacional (MDR,
MaambienteHabitaçaoOrdenamentodoTerritorio, ONG, FAO 2016/2017
Articulação entre as convenções MDesenvolvimentoRural, MAHOT, FAO, GEF,
ONG e parceiros internacionais Contínuo
Promover a redução do estoque dos POP’s utilizados como agrotóxico MDR,
MAHOT, Alfandegas, FAO, Sector Privado, Associações Agrícolas, ONG
2016/2017
Melhoramento da fiscalização na entrada dos produtos (Alfandegas, MDR,
DNA, MAI 2016/2017)
Recolha de dados e Sensibilização
Recolha de dados e mapeamento sobre o impacto dos pesticidas ao nivel
social, ambiental e de saúde (INEstatistica, MSaude, DNAmbiente, FAO,
Associação agrícolas)2016/2017
Atividades de sensibilização dos produtores rurais (MDR, ONG, FAO,
Associação dos agrícolas) Contínuo
Promoção de mais alternativas ao uso de pesticidas (MDR, MAHOT, FAO, ONG,
Associações agrícolas, Sector privado) Contínuo
Cooperação
Cooperação entre os sectores a nível nacional e internacional M
Desenvolvimento Rural, MAHabitacao Ordinamento Territorial, Sector
Privado, ONG, Associações Agrícolas Contínuo
Reforco
Reforco das capacidades nacionais FAO, MDR, MAHOT, Alfandegas, MAI
Contínuo
Parcerias
Incentivar o desenvolvimento de mecanismos financeiros e afirmar parcerias
técnicas e financeiras como instituições nacionais e internacionais para auxiliar
na execução (FAO, MDR, MAHOT,Parceiros nacionais e internacionais)
2016/2018
Experiência
Troca de experiência entre os usuários de pesticidas (Associação Agrícola,
MDR, MAHOT, ONG, FAO) Contínuo
15 | P a g eIntegração
Promover a integração do sector público e privado (MDR, MAHOT, sector
privado, FAO, Associações Agrícolas) Contínuo
Recursos
Mobilização de mais recursos para as ONG’s realizarem as atividades levando
em conta a insularidade do país (FAO, ONG, MDR, MAHOT) Contínuo
Seguimento
Acompanhamento do plano de acção (MDR, MAHOT, FAO, ONG, Associações
Agrícolas) Contínuo
Seguimento e assistência permanente do secretariado
GUINÉ-BISSAU - Ações chave
O processo de assinatura e ratificação da Convenção de Roterdão sobre Procedimento
de Consentimento Prévio Informado Aplicado a Certos Agrotóxicos e Substancias
Químicas Perigosos objecto de Comercio Internacional, foi pilotado pelo Ministério
do Ambiente, a semelhança das convenções de Basileia e Estocolmo. Portanto a
implementação técnica e prática da Convenção de Roterdão está a ser executada pelo
Ministério de Agricultura através do seu Serviço de Protecção Vegetal que é o Ponto
Focal Nacional e também faz o papel de AND.
A Guiné-Bissau assinou a Convenção de Roterdão no dia 10 de Setembro de 1999 e
no dia 02 de Março de 2005 foi ratificado pela Assembleia Nacional Popular através
da resolução nº 20/2005, depositado ao secretariado aos 12/06/ 2018 e
promulgado depois pelo Presidente da Republica aos 22 dias do mês de abril de
2009, através do decreto presidencial nº 19/2009.
A Guiné-Bissau assinou a Convenção de Roterdão no dia 10 de Setembro de 1999, no
dia 02 de Março de 2005 foi ratificado pela Assembleia Nacional Popular através da
resolução nº 20/2005, depositada ao Secretariado aos 12/06/ 2018 e promulgado
depois pelo Presidente da Republica aos 22 dias do mês de abril de 2009, através do
decreto presidencial nº 19/2009.
A Legislação nacional no domínio de pesticidas e em vigor no país data de 28 de
Agosto de 2000, publicado no Boletim Oficial n°35, através do Decreto-Lei n° 7/2000.
Esta legislação nacional permite:
Estabelecer um sistema de homologação no conjunto dos países do
Comité Inter-estados da luta contra a Seca no Sahel (CILSS).
Restringir em princípio a utilização dos produtos menos tóxicos,
através da classificação FAO/OMS.
16 | P a g eEstabelecer orientações com base nas diretivas da FAO, sobre segurança no armazém,
no transporte, na venda, na aplicação, etc.
Contudo carece de mecanismos de implementação.
Atividades – Periodos de Atuaçao – Estrutura responsavel e associadas
Elaboração da legislação nacional sobre produtos químicos estabelecidos no
anexo III da Convenção de Roterdão 2016-2017
Legislação específica
Transposição para o direito interno da Convenção de Roterdão
Estrutura responsavel: MADR, SEA/FAO
Estruturas associadas:FAO, ONGs, Ministérios concernentes, associações
agrícolas e sector privado
Elaboração de estratégia para implementação da CR 2016-2019
Resumo de convenção
Divulgação
Dinamização de Comité Nacional de Gestão de Pesticida
Coordenação entre as estruturas focais
Gestão de estoques de pesticidas
Propostas de acções alternativas aos pesticidas
Reforço de sinergias entre as convenções BRS, Minamata e Bamaco
Inventario dos produtos químicos
Estrutura responsavel: MADR, MSP e SEA
Estruturas associadas :Ministério das finanças, FAO
Reforço das capacidades nacionais sobre formulação e registos ao nível das
alfândegas, de inspetores e outras estruturas 2016-2017
Treinamento de pessoal das alfândegas e inspetores sobre controlo de
importação dos pesticidas
Reforço de Alfandega verde
Estrutura responsavel: MADR, MSP e SEA
Estruturas associadas: Ministério das finanças, FAO
Estabelecimento de mecanismos rápidos de identificação e seguimento de
casos de intoxicação resultante dos pesticidas 2017-2019
Aquisição e manipulação dos kits
Reforço de capacidade de pessoal de saúde
Criação de estrutura nacional de seguimento
Estrutura responsavel MADR, MSP e SEA
Estruturas associadas Ministérios concernentes e FAO
17 | P a g eDesenvolvimento de um quadro estratégico de treinamento de sensibilização
de todos os actores concernentes sobre gestão de pesticidas 2016-2020
Plano de formação e sensibilização
Proposta de programas para curricula escolares
Elaboração de conteúdo de programa de formação e sensibilização
Estrutura responsavel MADR, MSP e SEA
Estruturas associadas Ministérios concernentes e FAO
MOÇAMBIQUE - Ações chave
Indentificacao de problemas de importacao
1. Importação ilegal de Methamidophos nas fronteiras
2. Alguns financiadores de projetos tais como a malaria tem feito pressão no uso
de DDT, sendo que o uso deste é mais econômico e, no entanto os resultados
são mais eficientes no controlo de pragas, só que não viável para o meio
Ambiente,
3. A falta de responsabilidade dos comerciantes de pesticidas
4. O baixo índice de escolaridade pela população no que consiste o uso por parte
dos menores de idades.
5. Transito de produtos químicos e pesticidas do anexo 3, para os países vizinhos.
6. Dificuldades no preenchimento dos formulários sobre importação de
químicos;
Ações chave
Encontros entre os países Vizinhos para o desenho de estratégias do
movimento de pesticidas na região (Moçambique é o único pais que já
publicou a lista dos pesticidas proibidos, na mesma ele serve de corredor de
entrada de muitos produtos dos quais fazem parte da lista dos proibidos).
Desenho de estratégias de remoção do DDT do mercado Informal.
Fortalecimento das entidades de controle de movimento dos produtos
químicos do anexo 3,(Formação continua dos agentes fronteiriços, e o
aumento dos mesmos, deficiência de infraestruturas de trabalho mesmo em
grandes pontos de entradas).
Sensibilização dos vendedores e consumidores (agricultores), sobre os
perigos da venda ilegal e uso descuidado dos produtos químicos.
Treinamento sobre o preenchimento dos formulários para importação e
notificações
Alternativas ao uso de pesticidas: Maneio Integrado de Pragas (EMC – Escola na
Machamba do Camponês)
18 | P a g e Inventário nacional sobre produtos naturais usados no controlo de pragas
agrícolas (informação das instituições de investigação e ensino, Ministério da
Agricultura, agricultores);
Encontros/reuniões com a comunidade para divulgação dos métodos
alternativos aos químicos (Dias de campo);
Montar campos de demonstração dos efeitos do uso de produtos naturais no
controlo de pragas em algumas culturas
S. TOMÉ E PRÍNCIPE - Ações chave
1. Panorama Nacional
Dificuldades na obtenção de informação;
Inexistência de dados sistematizados no serviço Nacional de Saúde sobre os
acidentes causados por pesticidas.
Dificuldades na obtenção dos dados sobre a formulação de pesticidas
responsáveis por casos de intoxicação;
Falta de políticas / estratégias na gestão de produtos químicos;
Falta de uma Lei que regulamenta os produtos químicos;
Falta de uma entidade que regista e homologa os produtos químicos bem como
a falta de uma lista de pesticidas autorizados no país.
As questões relacionadas com os produtos químicos não são incluídos nos
programas nacionais como uma prioridade nacional;
Fraca capacidade nacional em matéria de gestão de produtos químicos;
Falta de uma base de dados sobre os produtos químicos;
Recursos financeiros insuficientes ao nível dos Ministérios e serviços.
Falta de mecanismo de planificação, de seguimento e de avaliação;
Falta entidade nacional que trabalhe especificamente nas de gestão integrada
de produtos químicos;
Falta de um mecanismo para a segurança e a emergência química.
2. Acções Chaves
1. Assistência técnica e elaboração da lei e normas técnicas sobre a gestão dos
produtos químicos e que possam regulamentar a importação e exportação dos
pesticidas no país. (2016-2017)
Entidades: . (MOPRNA/MADR/MAI M. Saúde, M. Emprego, etc ) FAO
19 | P a g e2. Criação de um centro nacional para a gestão integrada dos pesticidas. 2017-
2019
Entidades: Gov. (MOPRNA/MADR/MAI M. Saúde, M. Emprego, etc )
3. Criação de uma base de dados integrada para a gestão de pesticidas 2017-
2019
Entidades :Centro nacional, FAO
4. Capacitação dos quadros técnicos nacionais em matéria de gestão dos
pesticidas 2017-2019
Entidades :Governo RDSTP, ONGs, FAO
5. Reforço de capacidades analíticas dos laboratórios nacionais 2017-2019
Entidades : Governo RDSTP, CIAT/CATAP/CEN, FAO
6. Criação de uma rede trabalho nacional 2017-2019
Entidades: CIAT/CATAP/Centros, Saúde/Alfandegas, ONGs,
FAO/Secretariado RC
7. Assistência à autoridade nacional designada para o correcto preenchimento
dos formulários 2017-2019
Entidades: MOPRNA/DGA, FAO/Secretariado RC
8. Estabelecer cooperação técnica com institutos/centros internacionais de
referência. 2017-2019
Entidades: CIAT/CATAP/ Min. Saúde/ Alfandegas, FAO, parceiros Int.
9. Elaboração de um plano nacional direccionado para o aperfeiçoamento do
processo de prevenção preparação e resposta rápida à emergências
ambientais no país. Deve abranger actividades que potencialmente possam
causar acidentes com produtos químicos perigosos. 2017-2019
Entidades: Governo RDSTP, FAO, Parceiros Int.
Alternativas ao uso de pesticidas (Biopesticida etc) gestão integrada de
pragas
Reforço das capacidades analíticas do CIAT (Centro de Investigação
Agronómico e tecnológico) e do CATAP (Centro de aperfeiçoamento
agronómico pecuário)
Desenvolvimento de programas de capacitação em termos de
alternativas ecológicas
20 | P a g eRecomendações
Adopção de medidas que promovam a implementação das acções prioritárias acima
descritas de forma que possa contribuir para uma efectiva implementação da
Convenção de Roterdão no país.
21 | P a g eAnnex II - Agenda
Consultation for Portuguese-speaking African Parties (Angola, Cape Verde, Guinea- Bissau, Mozambique, São
Tomé and Principe) under the Rotterdam Convention.
Lisbon, Portugal 1-4 December, 2015
Date Time Activity Session Chair/Presenter
November 30th All day Arrival of the participants in Lisbon, Portugal
Pre-meeting for FAO staff and Resource persons
December 1st Day 1 OPENING
08.30-09.00 Registration All
Opening
RC Introduction - Opening remarks Elisabetta Tagliati/ RC
Secretariat
09.00-10.00
Getting to know each other: Introduction of participants All
Group Photo All
Session 1: FRAMING OUR WORK Session Chair: Cape Verde
10.00-10.15 Introducing workshop objectives, approach and expected outcomes Nadia Correale/ RC Secretariat
10.15-10.30 Tea & Coffee Break
SDGs, Basel, Rotterdam and Stockholm Conventions: Reducing risk from Elisabetta Tagliati/ RC
hazardous chemicals in synergy Secretariat
Video from Planet De-Tox All
(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_AXY2N4ZwY)
10.30- 12.30
Food Security, Rotterdam Convention and Agriculture production Elisabetta Tagliati/ RC
Secretariat
Regional Strategy for Food and Nutrition Security (ESAN-CPLP) and the Manuel Lapão CPLP
linkage with sustainable agriculture and the social and environmental impact of
pesticide use
Questions & Answers
12.30 – 14.00 Lunch
Session 2: NATIONAL STATUS OF IMPLEMENTATION Session Chair: São Tomé and
Principe
14.00-15.10 Angola: pesticide management regulatory framework; status of implementation DNA/Focal Person
of Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide use and
experience in non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM etc)
22 | P a g eCape Verde: pesticide management regulatory framework; status of DNA/Focal Person
implementation of Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide
use and experience in non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM
etc)
Guinea Bissau: pesticide management regulatory framework; status of DNA/Focal Person
implementation of Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide
use and experience in non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM
etc)
15.10- 15.40 Tea & Coffee Break
Mozambique: pesticide management regulatory framework; status of DNA/Focal Person
implementation of Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide
15.40-16.20 use and experience in non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM
etc)
São Tomé and Principe: pesticide management regulatory framework; status of DNA/Focal Person
implementation of Rotterdam Convention; data collection related to pesticide
use and experience in non-chemical alternatives to pesticides use (FFS, IPM
etc)
16.20-16.50 Overview on the status of implementation of Rotterdam Convention in Brazil Mirian de Oliveira - Ministry of
Environment Brazil
Questions & Answers
16.50-17.00 Wrap-up Elisabetta Tagliati/RC
Secretariat
December 2nd Day 2 Session 3: ROTTERDAM CONVENTION IMPLEMENTATION Session Chair: Guinea Bissau
09.00 – 10.45 Rotterdam Convention – Overview, benefits for ratification and main Elisabetta Tagliati/ RC
provisions: Secretariat
a) Ratifications steps
b) PIC procedure and Information exchange
c) Article 5: Notifications of Final Regulatory Actions
d) Article 10: Import responses
e) Article 12: Export Notifications
Questions & Answers
10.45 – 11.00 Tea & Coffee Break
National breakout groups work on RC main provisions and presentation in All
plenary of results of the discussions
11.00-12.30
Social and Environmental sustainability and data collection: Elisabetta Tagliati/Nadia
- Article 6 on Severely Hazardous Pesticide Formulations – Environmental Correale/RC Secretariat
and Human Health Incident Report –Decision Making process
12.30 – 14.00 Lunch
Session 4: SOCIAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF Chair: Mozambique
PESTICIDES USE AND DECISION MAKING PROCESS
23 | P a g e14.00-14.30 PAN – Pesticide poisonings and experience on data collection and pesticide Sheila Willis/PAN-UK
exposure of vulnerable groups
14.30-15.10 Brazil: Social and Environmental Analysis of pesticides use – national Mirian de Oliveira/Ministry of
experiences Environment Brazil
15.10- 15.25 Tea & Coffee Break
Decision Making process: Southern African Pesticide Regulators' Forum Ivy Saunyama/FAO SFS
15.25-16.00 (SAPReF), experience in implementing Rotterdam Convention
National breakout groups work on Article 6 on Severely Hazardous Pesticide All
16.00- 16.30
Formulations SHPF proposal and presentation in plenary of results
Questions & Answers All
16.50- 17.00 Wrap-up Elisabetta Tagliati/RC Secretariat
December 3rd Day 3 Session 5: FIELD VISIT – ALTERNATIVES to PESTICIDES
08.00-15.30 Field visit to Quinta do Arneiro:
- Presentation by AGRO-BIO and discussion for Partnership in the Organic Farming Association
framework of pesticides reduction strategy and food security (AGROBIO)
- Presentation by Quinta do Arneiro Quinta do Arneiro
Lunch at the “Quinta do Arneiro”
Projection of video of Growing coffee without endosulfan Sheila Willis
15.30–16.00
PAN UK
16.00 -16.40 Alternatives to the use of Pesticides: Elisabetta Tagliati/RC
- Farmer Field Schools – IPM Secretariat
Ivy Saunyama/FAO SFS
Questions & Answers All
16.50- 17.00 Wrap-up Elisabetta Tagliati/RC Secretariat
December 4th Day 4 Session 6: DEFINITION OF A NATIONAL WORKPLAN Session Chair: Angola
09.00-12.00 Work planning – Key actions to be identified: priorities at national level and Elisabetta Tagliati/Nadia
as an African lusophone countries Correale/RC Secretariat
National Breakout groups
10.30-10.45 Tea & Coffee Break
12.00-13.00 Report back in plenary All
13.00 – 14.00 Lunch
Technical assistance activities: A way forward for the future Elisabetta Tagliati/RC
14.00-16.30 Secretariat
Recommendations and Report All
24 | P a g eFAO Portugal Closing Remarks Helder Muteia/ FAO Rep
Portugal/ RC
Secretariat
Tea & Coffee Break
25 | P a g eAnnex III – List of Participants
ANGOLA
Sra. Mariad e Fátima Ikumba Kaupandawavali
Ponto Focal
Cabinet das Relações Internacionais
Ministério do Ambiente
Rua dos Enganos Nº 5, Torre Zimbo, Quinto Andar
Luanda
Email: m.ikumba@hotmail.com
Sra. Paula Cachacha
Técnica
Ministério da Agricultura-
Direcção Nacional da Agricultura e Pecuária-
Largo António Jacinto- Av. C/te Gika
Luanda
Email: paulacachacha@yahoo.com.br
CAPE VERDE
Sra. Anélide Leinice Querido Fernandes
Técnica
ADAD (Associação para Defesa do Ambiente e Desenvolvimento)
São Lourenço dos Órgãos
Email: lenice8querido@hotmail.com
GUINÉ-BISSAU
Sr. Pedro Correia Landim
DNA Convénio Rotterdam
Direção dos Serviços da Proteção Vegetal
Direção Geral de Agricultura
Ministério da Agricultura e Desenvolvimento rural
Av. Combatentes da Liberdade de Pátria
Palácio de Governo
Bissau
Tel.: +245 955 996830
Email: pedrocorreialandim@yahoo.com.br
Sr. Laurentino Rufino da Cunha
Diretor
Centro de Resíduos e produtos químicos
Ponto focal da Convenção de Estocolmo
Secretaria de Estado do Ambiente
Av. Combatentes da Liberdade de Pátria
Palácio de Governo
26 | P a g eBissau
Tel.: +245 955 804393
Email: laurentinorufino@gmail.com
Sra. Mireille da Rosa Fernandes Pereira
Coordenador de Prevenção e Controlo das Infecções
Instituto Nacional de Saúde ( INASA)
Av. Cidade de Lisboa
Bissau
Tel.: +245 955 145700
Email: miritapereira@hotmail.com
Sra. Zinha Adriano da Costa Correia
Responsável da Secção Entomologia
Direção dos Serviços da Proteção Vegetal
Ministério da Agricultura e Desenvolvimento rural
Av. Combatentes da Liberdade de Pátria
Palácio de Governo
Bissau
Tel.: +245 955 950893
Email: zcorreia@yahoo.fr
Sr. Baldé Mamadi
Especialista em Desenvolvimento Local
ONG DIVUTEC
Bairro Aguda 1 fase
CP 408 Bissau
Tel.: +245 955 929966
Email: mamadibalde@gmail.com
MOZAMBIQUE
Sra. Angelina Marissol Woderychda Silva Manhiça
Educador e Gestor ambiental
Ministério da Saúde
Av. Eduardo Mondlane/Salvador Allende
Maputo
Tel.: +258 21326264
Email: angelina.marissol@hotmail.com
Sr. Anastácio Luís
Registador de Pesticidas
Direção Nacional de Agricultura e Silvicultura
Recinto do IIAM, Edificio Novo, 1º Andar- Direito, Av, FPLM
C.P . 3658 Maputo
Tel.: +258 21415103
Email: anastacioluis@gmail.com
27 | P a g eSr. Hélio de Jesus Pedro Cuamba
Diretor
Departamento de Extensão
Escola de Desenvolvimento Rural
Bairro 7 de Setembro
Vilankulo
Tel.: +258 29382193
Email: heliocuamba82@gmail.com
Sra. Marla Abgail Namburete Chamusse
Livaningo (ONG)
Bairro de Malhangalene, Rua da Guarda nr 17
Cidade de Maputo
Tel.: +258 847671030/823816040
Email: marlaabigailc@gmail.com
SÃO TOMÉ E PRINCIPE
Sr. Darnel Hélio de Sousa Baía
Direção Geral do Ambiente
Av. Kwamne Nkrumah
1023 Ponte Mina
São Tomé
Tel.: +239 222 5323
Email: darnelbaia@sapo.pt
Sr. Herodes Rompão
Responsável da Unidade de Estudo e Pesquisa Operativa
Consultor Nacional de Inventário de POPs e Pesticidas
Ministério de Saúde/Centro Nacional de endemias
Quinta de San António
São Tomé
Tel.: +239 224 1650
Email: herodesrompao@gmail.com
Sra. Milary Disney Lopes Mandinga
Ministério de Agricultura
Av. Marginal 12 de julho
Caixa Postal 47
São Tomé
Tel.: +239 222 2682
Email: Milary19@hotmail.com
Sr. Gilberto de Ceita Diogo do Rosário
ONG Marapa
Largo Bom Despacho
Caixa Postal 292
28 | P a g eSão Tomé
Tel.: +239 222 2792
Email: g.rosario@marapa.org
Peritos convidados
Brasil
Sra. Mirian de Oliveira
Ministério do Ambiente
SEPN 505, Bloco B, Lote 2
Ed. Marie Prendi Cruz, T-18
70730-542 Brasília
Tel.: +55 61 2028 2033
Email: mirian.oliveira@mma.gov.br
FAO Subregional Office
Ms Ivy Saunyama
Consultant on Pesticide Risk Reduction
FAOSFS
Harare
Zimbabwe
Email: Ivy.Saunyama@fao.org
Pesticide Action Network (PAN)
Ms Sheila Willis
Head of International Programmes
Pesticide Action Network UK (PAN UK)
14 Palace Road,
Ripon
North Yorkshire HG4 1ET
United Kingdom
Tel.: +44(0)1765 601586
Email: sheilawillis@pan-uk.org
Secretariado da Convenção de Roterdão
Ms Elisabetta Tagliati
Programme Officer
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
Rome
Italy
Email: elisabetta.tagliati@fao.org
Ms Nadia Correale
Consultant
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
29 | P a g eViale delle Terme di Caracalla
Rome
Italy
Email: nadia.correale@fao.org
Ms Inma Roda Martin
Programme Assistant
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO)
Viale delle Terme di Caracalla
Rome
Email: inma.rodamartin@fao.org
30 | P a g eYou can also read
