Pride in Prevention A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities Marina Carman, Jackson Fairchild, Matthew ...
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Pride in Prevention A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities Marina Carman, Jackson Fairchild, Matthew Parsons, Claire Farrugia, Jennifer Power and Adam Bourne
A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities Contents Introduction and aims....................................2 Where we stand................................................3 Existing frameworks..................................................................................................3 Existing policy initiatives .........................................................................................3 Pride in Prevention: A guide to primary Existing research and limitations..........................................................................4 prevention of family violence experienced Existing approaches to drivers.............................................................................. 7 by LGBTIQ communities Marina Carman, Jackson Fairchild, Key insights....................................................... 9 Matthew Parsons, Claire Farrugia, Inequality and power................................................................................................9 Jennifer Power and Adam Bourne. Gender dynamics......................................................................................................9 Cisnormativity and heteronormativity................................................................9 Produced by Rainbow Health Victoria for the Intersectionality........................................................................................................10 LGBTIQ Family Violence Prevention Project Perpetration of violence........................................................................................ 12 2019–2021 This project is funded by the Office for Building on existing work............................ 13 Women in the Victorian Department of Societal level.............................................................................................................. 14 Premier and Cabinet System and institutional level ............................................................................. 14 Organisational and community level ............................................................... 14 Disclaimer: Every effort has been made to Individual and relationship level ......................................................................... 15 ensure the information contained in this publication is accurate and current at the Implications for primary prevention........16 date of printing. Responding to drivers at societal level ...........................................................18 ISBN: 978-0-6487166-6-2 Responding to drivers at system and institutional level.............................20 Responding to drivers at organisational and community level...............22 Layout and editing: tinderspark Responding to drivers at individual and relationship level........................24 Illustration: Thirst Creative Next steps........................................................ 26 Icons by Smashicons and Freepik References.......................................................27 © La Trobe University 2020 A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
Existing frameworks of violence for women and children, and This guide has been produced to inform primary prevention LGBTIQ communities.2 This guide is informed by Change the story, initiatives aimed at family violence experienced by lesbian, Gender and gender inequality are a national framework for primary prevention gay, bisexual, trans and gender diverse, intersex and queer of violence against women and children in built on the assumption that ‘real’ (LGBTIQ) communities. Australia1. Change the story defines primary men and ‘real’ women are necessarily prevention as follows: heterosexual. But the existence of LGB It is an output of the LGBTIQ Family Violence This guide has been developed as a people raises the possibility that men Prevention Project 2019–2021 which is funded resource for those engaged in the primary Primary prevention requires changing and women may or may not behave in by the Office for Women in the Victorian prevention of family violence experienced the social conditions, such as gender stereotypically masculine and feminine Department of Premier and Cabinet. The by LGBTIQ communities, and will underpin inequality, that excuse, justify or even ways, and can be attracted to people project is being undertaken by Rainbow Health pilot interventions undertaken as part of this promote violence against women and of more than one sex or gender. Here, Victoria, a program that supports LGBTIQ project. The guide: their children. Individual behaviour like trans and gender diverse people, health and wellbeing through research and change may be the intended result of LGB people challenge the assumptions X builds on existing frameworks and prevention activity, but such change knowledge translation, training, resources, that underpin a binary, heterogendered initiatives cannot be achieved prior to, or in policy advice and service accreditation model of the relationship between sex, X summarises the existing research isolation from, a broader change in the through the Rainbow Tick. Rainbow Health gender and sexuality. In doing so, they base and knowledge gaps underlying drivers of such violence Victoria sits within the Australian Research threaten to expose the patriarchal and X puts forward a proposed model for across communities, organisations and Centre in Sex, Health and Society at La Trobe heterosexist underpinnings of family understanding the drivers of family society as a whole. A primary prevention University. violence that link violence against women violence experienced by LGBTIQ approach works across the whole and their children, and violence against The overall aims of the project are to: communities population to address the attitudes, LGBTI people. (p. 8) X makes recommendations for the practices and power differentials that X address critical evidence gaps in design and delivery of future primary The report highlighted the need to address LGBTIQ family violence primary drive violence against women and their prevention activities the structural drivers of violence experienced prevention children. (p. 13) by LGBTIQ people through work at both ‘the X strengthen understanding of the Note: Variations of the acronym LGBTIQ Primary prevention is targeted at the deep socio-structural level (such as through policy, drivers of family violence experienced will be used throughout this document underlying social drivers of violence through legislation and institutional practices), and at by LGBTIQ communities depending on which communities are initiatives aimed at stopping violence before the community or individual level (such as X develop shared understandings of the included in particular studies or discussions. it starts. This should be distinguished from through direct participation or community drivers of LGBTIQ family violence and There is a notable lack of research including early intervention, which aims to support mobilisation approaches)’. (p 11) prevention approaches across LGBTIQ people with an intersex variation, but they will individuals and families by identifying and organisations, family violence services be included in the discussion below where stopping violence in the early stages. This guide aims to develop these ideas further. and government research and insights are relevant to their Larger-scale consultation and reviews of experiences and needs. Change the story identifies gender inequality evidence and interventions will be needed in X build the expertise and capacity of as the key social factor driving violence order to develop a shared national primary LGBTIQ organisations and mainstream . against women. This is associated with rigid family violence services in the design prevention framework that is inclusive of gender roles and stereotyped constructions LGBTIQ experiences of family and intimate and delivery of primary prevention of masculinity and femininity. It does not, partner violence. This guide seeks to activities for LGBTIQ communities however, include an examination contribute to a process that can be continued X test and deliver community-based of family violence experienced by into the future. primary prevention activities with and LGBTIQ communities. for LGBTIQ communities and explore opportunities for replication Subsequent work by Our Watch and GLHV Existing policy initiatives (now called Rainbow Health Victoria) identified commonalities in the drivers As part of the whole-of-government approach to tackling family violence in Pride in Prevention A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
Victoria, LGBTIQ communities have been Existing research There are very few studies that include though the gender of the perpetrator was recognised and included in a comprehensive perpetrators of family violence experienced not always included.12,13 There is limited policy response. and limitations by LGBTIQ communities. Many studies research looking at trans and gender diverse Overall, there is a lack of population-wide investigating the prevalence of LGBTIQ experiences of intimate partner violence, The Everybody Matters: Inclusion and data on the prevalence of family violence experiences of family violence have not but it is reported at higher rates than their Equity Statement 3 strengthens the policy experienced by LGBTIQ communities, as included questions about the identity cisgender peers, and there are indications commitment to focusing on diverse adequate questions about sex characteristics, of perpetrators. This significantly limits that trans women report higher rates than communities and working towards an gender identity and sexuality have not been understanding of the dynamics of violence. trans men.14,15 inclusive, safe, responsive and accountable included in national data sets and studies. Major gaps here include research that There is a growing body of Some have suggested that this lack of a Prevalence includes an examination of the gender and research focus is related to a culture of literature that has investigated silence around this violence.5 However, sexual identity of perpetrators, that separates Intimate partner violence out the experiences of trans and gender the prevalence, nature and forms there is a growing body of literature that diverse people assigned male or female A number of studies have found that intimate of violence that are specific to has investigated the prevalence, nature partner violence is reported at similar rates at birth, and that investigates the specific and forms of violence that are specific to LGBTIQ communities. LGBTIQ communities. in same-gender relationships to heterosexual experiences of non-binary people. relationships, while some studies have Due to limited research, very little is currently In reviewing the literature, it is worth found higher rates.5,7,9-11 Research looking known about the experiences of people with family violence system for all Victorians. acknowledging important limitations at the experiences of bisexual people has an intersex variation.16 Rainbow Health Victoria is contributing to and challenges. mostly investigated the experiences of the strategic priorities in this policy by bisexual women, finding higher rates X The few studies that do address family leading a series of interlinked projects compared to lesbian-identified violence experienced by LGBTIQ providing training, support for service or heterosexual women. communities tend to have small accreditation through the Rainbow Tick, This appears to most sample sizes and vary in terms of and family violence sector development often be violence methodology, making generalisations to improve LGBTIQ inclusion. perpetrated and comparisons difficult. Free from Violence: Victoria’s strategy to by a male X Definitions of violence and abuse prevent family violence and all forms of partner, vary between studies, and are applied violence against women4 also includes inconsistently across violence a focus on driving innovative prevention experienced in families and intimate practices, including with LGBTIQ communities. relationships. Activities focussed on primary prevention X Definitions of sex, gender and of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ sexuality are used differently across communities have tended to be small-scale studies, failing at times to capture and uncoordinated. Several projects funded diversity in identity and experience by the Office for Women in the Victorian within LGBTIQ communities.6–8 Department of Premier and Cabinet are An important issue in the literature on family being undertaken, including mapping existing violence more generally is the dominance initiatives with a range of partners and testing of studies of victim-survivors, despite the new ones. The LGBTIQ Family Violence Primary difficulties involved in securing participation Prevention Project aims to bring together and while minimising re-traumatisation. This build on this existing work. focus is valid and necessary, but it can obscure the importance of investigating what influences and motivates people who choose violence, and what can be done for and with perpetrators to prevent family violence. Pride in Prevention
Most studies looking at prevalence are In ‘coming out’ within families, LGBTQ people therefore may not be subjected to abuse X Withholding of finances for medical located in the United States and Canada, can be subject to rejection, abuse and and violence motivated by homophobia, services or items for expressing but a small number of Australian studies violence. 24–28 Experiences of rejection are biphobia or transphobia. However, people gender identity have investigated experiences of LGBTIQ linked to high rates of homelessness, with with an intersex variation may experience X Focusing on features associated with intimate partner violence. 17–19 young people describing verbal and physical unnecessary medical and other ‘normalising’ an individual’s birth-assigned sex and abuse, and family attempts to ‘normalise’ interventions, as well as negative attitudes saying that a transgender person isn’t The types and impact of intimate their gender and sexuality. Despite little 29 towards their bodies and identity. 33 a ‘real’ woman or man partner violence have been found published evidence, people with an intersex While violence is perpetrated against X Targeting of gendered body features variation report family rejection and abuse, during violence41–43 to be similar for same gender especially when their affirmed gender identity LGBTIQ people, it is important to note that violence is also perpetrated by and within While these studies have focussed on relationships and heterosexual differs from their birth-assigned sex.16 LGBTIQ communities — and can potentially intimate partner violence, there are relationships. However, some Violence in the ‘chosen family’ of LGBTIQ be motivated by homophobia, biphobia, similarities with the homophobic, biphobic differences have been identified in people has not been investigated. In addition, transphobia and intersexphobia, as well as and transphobic violence reported by LGBTQ up to a third of LGBTIQ people experiencing sexism and misogyny. Much less is known people within their families of origin. terms of how perpetrators exploit intimate partner violence have reported about this violence, and a research focus has knowledge of sexual and gender having children living with them at the perhaps been avoided due to fear of further There are also reports that psychological abuse of people with an intersex variation identity within social networks or time of the abuse,30 but little is known stigmatising LGBTIQ communities. within their families can include shaming wider community in order to control about the experiences of children in and ostracising, treating the child LGBTIQ-parented families. and harm. Nature of violence less favourably and insistence on ‘sex-appropriate’ behaviour.16 Broader experiences of violence Family violence experienced by LGBTIQ people can include a range of verbal, Family violence A number of Australian studies have found emotional, psychological, financial, physical, Existing approaches that LGBTQ people report high levels of Definitions of family for LGBTIQ people verbal and physical abuse, harassment and sexual abuse, intimidation and threats. to drivers The types and impact of intimate partner often distinguish between ‘family of origin’ and sexual assault, including within their violence have been found to be similar for The literature on drivers of family and intimate (biological or adoptive family) and other family homes.23,31,32 A recent international review same-gender relationships and heterosexual partner violence for LGBTIQ communities is forms or ‘chosen family’ that LGBTIQ people found an elevated risk for these experiences relationships.9,34–36 not well-developed. However, existing work create, sometimes in response to rejection. for LGBTQ people that persists through on the drivers of violence against women, childhood, adolescence and adulthood.23 However, some differences have been particularly theoretical approaches, is relevant The literature on violence and abuse of identified in terms of how perpetrators of and useful in this context. LGBTIQ people by members of their family Within this, trans and gender diverse people intimate partner violence against LGBTQ of origin is limited, and often does not define report higher levels of violence and abuse, people exploit knowledge of identity within Approaches to understanding the drivers of this as ‘family violence’. There is a small body and sexual violence and coercion. In a recent social networks or wider community, in violence against women have focussed on of research mostly focussed on the impact of Australian study of trans and gender diverse order to control and harm. the role of gender inequality. negative relationships between parents and sexual health, sexual violence and coercion LGB adolescents, with even less focussed on This can include: According to Change the Story, the national was reported most often by trans and trans and gender diverse adolescents.20 framework for the primary prevention of non-binary participants who were X Using homophobia, biphobia and Experiences of family rejection have assigned female at birth.32 transphobia as a means to assert been found to have significant negative Experiences of family violence are power and control The literature on drivers of family consequences on the mental health and X Revealing or threatening to reveal wellbeing of LGBT young people and, by compounded by experiences of abuse and intimate partner violence for and violence in public spaces, educational the sexual or gender identity or contrast, family acceptance has both a positive settings and workplaces, impacting birth-assigned sex of a partner LGBTIQ communities is not well impact and protective effect against negative LGBTQ people in all areas and at all X Revealing or threatening to reveal the developed. However, existing work outcomes.20–22 A small number of studies stages of their lives.2 HIV status of a partner19,35,37–40 on the drivers of violence against have found that LGB young people are more likely than heterosexual siblings to experience People with intersex variations may not have For trans and gender diverse people this can women, particularly theoretical also include: childhood verbal, physical and sexual abuse.23 diverse sexual and gender identities, and approaches, is relevant and useful. Pride in Prevention
violence against women and their children So a major focus in family violence prevention in Australia, the gendered drivers of — particularly in working with men who use violence are: violence — is how gender inequality is reinforced through social norms.50 X Condoning of violence against Gender norms are not biological, but Inequality and power LGBTIQ people also exist within a broader women context of masculinised social norms that socially constructed, learnt, and subject A small number of studies have found that X Men’s control of decision making and endorse and legitimise violence. It is not to cultural and historical variation.51 Norms power imbalances influence the dynamics limits to women’s independence uncommon for men to inflict violence upon are unwritten rules of acceptable and ideal of violence within same-gender intimate X Stereotyped constructions of other men in a range of circumstances, and conduct and behaviour. These are articulated relationships, such as inequalities related to masculinity and femininity for this to be excused and condoned. Women in institutions and systems, and influence income, education, ethnicity, access to social X Disrespect towards women and may also enact violence against other attitudes and behaviours for individuals within networks, being ‘out’ or other factors. 53–56 male peer relations that emphasise women, including female partners, family and intimate relationships. The socio- Inequality can also be based on gender aggression1 in the context of a cultural environment that ecological model developed to understand identity in intimate relationships for trans endorses anger as one of the few emotions This approach is underpinned by a the drivers of men’s violence against women and gender diverse people, particularly 41 deemed acceptable during periods of significant body of feminist literature from is a way of describing this complex interplay those in partnerships with cisgender people. distress60 and assigns greater social value to the 1970s onwards, which has focussed on of individual, relationship, community and Inequality in power is also a key factor in traits of aggression and dominance typically power imbalances that are rooted in social macro-social levels.1,52 violence perpetrated in families by adults seen as masculine.51 In these ways, violence is structures, specifically gender inequality.44–46 Important insights can be gained by bringing against LGBTIQ children and adolescents. condoned as a means of control, regardless An important predictor of men’s violence an analysis of this literature together with of the gender of the perpetrator.61 against women has been found to be existing research that has investigated Gender dynamics adherence to sexist, dominating and experiences and understandings of LGBTIQ A number of studies have found that sexually hostile attitudes.47-49 LGBTIQ communities are not immune to family and intimate partner violence. gender norms, but how these operate in the the dominance of heteronormative The following section includes some key context of same-gender and gender diverse (and cis-normative) models of family insights from this analysis. relationships is a gap in knowledge. violence make it harder for LGBTQ The application of feminist approaches people to recognise and label to men’s violence against women can intimate partner violence as such, inadvertently reproduce stereotypes that link violence perpetration to ‘masculine’ creating silence around this violence. bodies or gender presentation. This can lead to assumptions that LGBTIQ people Cisnormativity and recycle these norms in their intimate heteronormativity relationships,57 for example, along the lines of ‘butch/femme’ or ‘top/bottom’. Some Rigid gender norms are reinforced by the existing approaches to intimate partner idea that the only ‘normal’ and ‘natural’ bodies violence have inadvertently contributed to and gender identities are ‘male’ and ‘female’. societal myths that either violence does not The binary gender norms that drive violence occur in lesbian relationships or is ‘mutual against women are therefore inherently linked violence’, and that violence between gay men to the cisnormativity that drives violence should be tolerated and excused because against trans and gender diverse people, and of perceptions about comparable physical motivates medical interventions aimed at strength and power.39,58,59 ‘normalising’ intersex bodies. Additional research is needed to investigate In addition to rigid gender norms and gendered dynamics within the diversity of cisnormativity, heteronormativity is a key LGBTIQ relationships, and how these interact factor in the inequality and discrimination with experiences of violence. experienced by LGBTIQ communities. A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
Heteronormativity includes a suite of cultural, and help-seeking by victim-survivors37,54,63 in legal and institutional practices that work some cases also because of self-blame for to explicitly privilege relationships between victimisation.68 This can be worse for bisexual ‘men’ and ‘women’ as the only ‘normal’ and people who feel doubly excluded from ‘natural’ form of relationship. 62 mainstream and LGBTIQ communities.5 A number of studies have found that the Because of the dominance of cisnormativity dominance of heteronormative (and cis- and heteronormativity, LGBTIQ people normative) models of family violence make may also be less able to recognise and it harder for LGBTQ people to recognise identify abuse and violence in their ‘family and label intimate partner violence as such, of origin’ as ‘family violence’. This violence creating silence around this violence. This 63 may be excused or condoned on cultural or silencing has been found to impact on LGBTQ faith-based grounds. It is also possible that people staying in abusive relationships, LGBTIQ people may label their experiences and also to delay recognition of violence as homophobic, biphobic, transphobic by victim-survivors, their families and or intersexphobic violence, and therefore One communities.64 There are indications that not see the relevance of messaging and study LGBTIQ community awareness of intimate programs aimed preventing or responding on family partner violence is low.65 to family violence. acceptance of LGBT young LGBTQ people may delay reporting due to Rigid gender norms, cisnormativity and people found that it fears that police and service providers will heteronormativity are key factors in the abuse was lower amongst those minimise or fail to understand or take their and violence experienced by LGBTIQ people from migrant, religious and lower concerns seriously.17,61 Other studies have within their families of origin, and in society socio-economic backgrounds.26 Others found and community support or rejection is closely suggested that silencing occurs because more generally. A recent Australian review has specific experiences within LGBTIQ culturally related to health outcomes.76 More needs of fear that reporting intimate partner reinforced the significant connection between and linguistically diverse communities, to be done to understand the compounded violence will lead to further stigmatisation gendered and homophobic violence.69 This including faith- or religious-motivated verbal impact of colonialism and the historical of LGBTQ identities and relationships.57 This connection reinforces the need for gender- and physical abuse and family exile.70,71 imposition of rigid gender norms and fear of further stigmatisation appears to be transformative approaches that challenge rigid A small number of Australian studies have heteronormative family structures, as well as compounded for people from culturally and gender norms by simultaneously addressing looked at experiences of LGBT people in how these operate in a current-day context. linguistically diverse communities.66,67 cisnormativity and heteronormativity. migrant and refugee communities, finding Meanwhile, there is evidence of high levels of Experiences of stigma and discrimination erasure and shame, and concern about the violence and sexual violence (including within have also been shown to impact on disclosure Intersectionality reactions of immediate and extended family family settings) experienced by LGBT people and communities.72–75 with a disability.77,78 Little has been published Overlapping systems of inequality and Overlapping systems of inequality discrimination can influence LGBTIQ peoples’ More research is needed to look at intra- on the drivers of violence in this context. and discrimination can influence experiences of intimate partner and family group differences in these communities It is worth noting that LGBTQ people report that might interact with experiences of LGBTIQ peoples’ experiences of violence. This includes inequality and that relationships with peers and community discrimination based on culture, Aboriginality, intimate partner and family violence, such as connections are important protective factors intimate partner and family ethnicity, socio-economic status, ability, migration status, experiences of pre-arrival or in terms of health and wellbeing.31 Having violence. This includes inequality geography, age, migration status and migration trauma, patterns of help-seeking, other community, organisational, religious, and varying understandings of relevant and discrimination based on religion. These can all influence individual, cultural and extended family connections family and community understandings of issues such as family responsibility and can also be important sources of support for culture, Aboriginality, ethnicity, sex, gender and sexuality. Through this, the confidentiality. LGBTIQ people.70 However, protective factors socio-economic status, ability, impact of rigid gender norms, cisnormativity There is an absence of research on the for wellbeing, such as religious affiliation, geography, age, migration status and heteronormativity will be felt differently experiences of family violence for LGBTIQ can be disrupted depending on the level of by LGBTIQ people depending on these and religion. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islanders. community acceptance.20 intersecting social characteristics, and can However, there are indications that family be made worse. Pride in Prevention A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
on both perpetrators and victim-survivors.81–84 The literature focusses on how negative self-worth is expressed through Despite the limitations of existing research, the insights outlined violence against partners, above provide a basis to begin to develop a conceptual model or in accepting violence by for the drivers of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ partners.85 However, while communities. A preliminary model presented below is intended there is some evidence of to guide prevention approaches and future research that will an association, a causal link is not clear.5,38,86 allow it to be tested and adapted over time. In addition, the relationship between For LGBTIQ people the drivers of violence the drivers of family violence experienced family of origin violence and perpetration are likely to be similar and different to by LGBTIQ communities is presented here. of intimate partner violence is unclear. those experienced by heterosexual and The model includes an examination of Various studies have linked harsh parenting cisgender women, in that they include rigid the drivers that operate at different levels, to later intimate partner violence in intimate gender norms, but also cisnormativity and including societal, systems and institutional, relationships, 87–89 but more work needs to be heteronormativity. A conceptual model for organisational and community, and individual done in the context of LGBTIQ experiences. understanding the drivers of family violence and relationship. experienced by LGBTIQ communities must More broadly, LGBTQ people face high levels This model suggests that the drivers of family Perpetration of violence of homophobic, biphobic and transphobic consider the resulting inequality attached to violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities LGBTIQ bodies, identities and relationships, A problem noted in the literature on men’s abuse and violence within a range of social are likely to be better understood in the and how this plays out within the different violence against women is the tendency to contexts outside of the family, 77,90 and have broader social context of marginalisation and contexts of family and intimate relationships. focus on adversity as a cause of individual been found to experience poorer mental discrimination faced by LGBTIQ communities. perpetration.1 This can be misinterpreted as health.91–95 This creates a challenging social Drawing on foundational work in Change the These conditions create attitudes that making excuses for violence, a pattern that context within which to build individual self- Story, a proposed socio-ecological model for potentially drive family violence experienced can be echoed by perpetrators in justifying worth and healthy relationships. their behaviour.79,80 Overall, existing research on family violence A number of studies have focussed on experienced by LGBTIQ communities Societal System & Organisational Individual & the relationship between experiences of does not currently address a wide range institutional & community relationship stigma, discrimination, ‘minority stress’ and of research questions that are key to X Rigid gender X Inequality in X Devaluation of X Homophobic, ‘internalised homophobia’, and experiences of understanding the predictors, drivers or norms recognition of bodies, identities biphobic, correlates of this violence. There is also a Drivers intimate partner violence for LGBTQ people, bodies, identities and relationships transphobic and X Cisnormativity though most studies look at the influence very small body of literature on interventions, and relationships X Reproduction of intersexphobic X Hetero- involving counselling, couple and group norms and behaviour normativity Relationships with peers and therapy, and perpetrator interventions.96 stereotypes X Normalisation The literature on primary prevention of of violence contact with LGBTIQ communities and abuse family violence experienced by LGBTIQ are important protective factors communities is not developed. What do these X Homophobia, X Invalidation of X Stigma and X Negative in terms of health and wellbeing. Nevertheless, existing research on family and biphobia, identities and discrimination self-worth Having other community, intimate partner violence experienced by transphobia and intersexphobia relationships X Loss of bodily X Normalisation of inequality X Perpetration of violence lead to? organisational, religious, cultural LGBTIQ communities has established these as X Gendered autonomy X Failure to and abuse issues requiring further investigation, service and extended family connections responses and policy focus. Additional insights cultures of violence X Discrimination X Failure of recognise violence X Poorer health outcomes can also be important sources of can be gained by connecting this with the responses to support for LGBTIQ people. strong body of existing research on the drivers violence of violence against women. Pride in Prevention
by LGBTIQ communities, including views that of origin. Gendered patterns of inequality and those who do not have diverse sexual LGBTIQ people regularly experience LGBTIQ bodies, people and relationships are cultures of violence also contribute to the and gender identities, may not always be less valid, healthy or worthy. perpetration and experience of violence within impacted. However, distinct organisational institutional failures to recognise It is proposed that these violence-supporting families and LGBTIQ intimate relationships. failures to acknowledge and validate people their identities and relationships, as attitudes operate at each level of the model with intersex variations can occur. well as systemic and institutional to increase the perpetration of violence System and institutional More broadly, silencing and negative obstructions to individual bodily experienced by LGBTIQ communities, and level stereotypes in community and family autonomy. LGBTIQ people continue the likelihood that this violence is condoned discussions about LGBTIQ bodies, identities or accepted. Each level of the proposed In Australia, legal recognition and protections and relationships mean that these are denied to face socially-sanctioned for LGBTIQ people have changed significantly socio-ecological model for the drivers of family and invalidated. This perpetuates a situation discrimination in areas including violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities in the last decade, although important gaps where stigma endures, and violence can be remain for trans and gender diverse, and work, religion, schooling, healthcare will be examined below. excused and condoned. people with an intersex variation. Regardless, and social service provision. LGBTIQ people who experience family This model suggests that the drivers LGBTIQ people regularly experience violence may be less able to recognise or experienced by LGBTIQ people is influenced institutional failures to recognise their identities of family violence for LGBTIQ people and relationships, as well as systemic and name their experiences as family violence. by inequalities and cultures of violence are likely to be better understood institutional obstructions to individual bodily This is likely to be compounded by an created by gender norms, cisnormativity absence of positive models and portrayals and heteronormativity, along with other in the broader social context of autonomy. LGBTIQ people continue to face inequalities in power and resources. socially-sanctioned discrimination in areas of healthy family and intimate relationships. marginalisation and discrimination including work, religion, schooling, healthcare Some LGBTIQ people have limited support Repeated experiences of stigma and faced by LGBTIQ communities. and social service provision. from their families and communities, and discrimination can lower the expectations this may increase social isolation. LGBTIQ Inequality in recognition of LGBTIQ bodies, of LGBTIQ people that they deserve to be communities may not know about or be Societal level identities and relationships is devaluing able to access inclusive family violence treated equally and with respect. Coupled and reproduces stigma and discrimination. with broader experiences of violence, this Rigid gender norms produce attitudes that services, as this has only more recently been Media portrayals of, and commentaries can serve to normalise violence experienced the only acceptable and ‘normal’ forms recognised as a community need in Victoria. about, LGBTIQ people can be negative and by LGBTIQ people within a family or intimate of human expression of sex, gender and Within LGBTIQ communities, there may be partner context. reproduce stereotypes, thereby further sexuality are cisgendered and heterosexual. less willingness to recognise and respond reinforcing marginalisation and justifying The perpetration of family violence Homophobia, biphobia and transphobia are to experiences of intimate partner or other the perpetration of violence. in all forms is a choice. Perpetrators expressions of discrimination against people family violence — either due to reliance who sit outside of dominant gender norms Inequality in recognition at this level also of violence need to be held accountable on maintaining community cohesion, or and heteronormative assumptions about creates silence around LGBTIQ families and for using violence. Better understanding investment in the appearance of LGBTIQ relationships. Similarly, people with intersex intimate relationships. This perpetuates the association between stigma, self-worth, people having relationships appearing variations can be seen as sitting outside of an environment where family violence experiencing family of origin violence, worthy of equal recognition and value. medical and social norms relating to sex and experienced by LGBTIQ people can remain and perpetration within the diversity of gender, and therefore be subjected to stigma unrecognised and unaddressed in policy LGBTIQ relationships would help to identify and shame. and service responses. Individual and relationship strategies for prevention. Negative beliefs Experiences of violence and abuse for level about self-worth may influence people to deny, condone or accept violence LGBTIQ people within society and within Organisational and The compound impact of rigid gender and abuse. This is associated with negative families result from, or are condoned because community level norms, cisnormativity and heteronormativity health, particularly mental health, outcomes. of, the belief that LGBTIQ people are ‘less can create a sense of negative self-worth than’, or that they require correction to LGBTQ people are regularly denied equal for LGBTIQ individuals. Homophobia, bring them back to the norm. recognition in organisational policies biphobia, transphobia and intersexphobia and processes. In addition, norms that can motivate violence experienced by Homophobia, biphobia, transphobia and exclude LGBTQ people are reproduced in LGBTIQ people within their family of origin intersexphobia drive violence and abuse organisational cultures unless challenged. and be used by partners in relationships with towards LGBTIQ people within their families People with intersex variations, especially LGBTIQ people. Intimate partner violence Pride in Prevention A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
On the other hand, existing primary Repeated experiences of stigma prevention organisations and programs have significant expertise in understanding and discrimination can lower the and acting to challenge the drivers of expectations of LGBTIQ people that gender-based violence. However, programs they deserve to be treated equally addressing or including LGBTIQ communities Understanding the drivers of family violence experienced have not yet been consistently implemented. and with respect. Coupled with by LGBTIQ communities is essential in targeting primary broader societal violence, this can An integrated and mutually reinforcing prevention efforts. #E QU LG BT IQ approach needs to be developed. This serve to normalise experiences of violence for LGBTIQ people within a AL I approach needs to both counter the drivers RI TS TY GH An integrated and mutually around approaches, settings and techniques. Change the story argues for a sustained of violence and increase the ability of family or intimate partner context. reinforcing approach needs to be and intensive effort at all levels of the people and communities to recognise and respond. This is important in leading whole- developed. This approach needs to socio-ecological model in order to shift the These principles should be considered in of-community initiatives to prevent violence, both counter the drivers of violence entrenched gender-based norms driving and supporting LGBTIQ people the design and implementation of all primary violence. For LGBTIQ communities, this must and increase the ability of people include effort to shift rigid gender norms, as and communities. prevention activities aimed at family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities. and communities to recognise well as cisnormativity and heteronormativity. The earlier literature review ho e ic Our Watch and by C In doing so, activities must ensure: and respond. There is significant expertise in LGBTIQ GLHV (now RainbowM y Health Victoria) outlined a number of important principles to guide X LGBTIQ-community-led messaging community organisations in addressing dy primaryBoprevention work for family violence (‘Nothing about us without us’) these issues, and a progressive investment M y Again, Change the story provides important experienced by LGBTIQ communities. X Leadership on the integration of in LGBTIQ inclusion programs and policy groundwork in identifying essential actions LGBTIQ inclusion into mainstream initiatives, particularly in Victoria. However, X Engage and include LGBTI to reduce the drivers of violence against primary prevention activities. within this, the dynamics around the drivers people in the planning, design women and children, as well as suggestions The conceptual model outlined above of family and intimate partner violence and implementation of all experienced by LGBTIQ people prevention efforts can be used to inform the development have not been consistently X Address the structural drivers of of essential high-level strategic actions as understood or violence against LGBTI people well as achievable short-term interventions. addressed. X Uphold and promote human rights Proposed approaches to guide future primary X Be inclusive of the diversity of LGBTI prevention activities will be outlined below for #E LG ge people and communities in all each level of the model. QUBTIQ an RI AL c h x GH ITY ow f se universal prevention efforts TS n o an rd X Adopt an intersectional approach u c co .au Yo r re v u go that acknowledges and responds to yo vic. . bd m the diversity and diverse needs within LGBTI communities LO X Be specific about who prevention L O efforts are tailored for LO X Ensure planning allows time, space L and resources for ongoing critical O #E QU AL LG RIG BT HT IQ S IT Y reflection, and reflective practice BTIQ I TY #E LG QUBTIQ X Be open to synergies with other AL RIGAL LG fields of prevention work QU Y ITY S HT IT IQ #E BT AL IG R LG HT S QU HT S #E RIG B TIQ I TY X Identification and balancing of LG AL QU risks and benefits S HT #E IGR X Be evidence-based and evidence-building2 #E LG QUBTIQ RI AL GH TS ITY A guide to primary prevention of family violence experienced by LGBTIQ communities
Responding to drivers at societal level Workforce development My Ch oic e A successful primary prevention strategy requires a workforce trained in delivering dy Bo My Initial priorities and testing interventions based on the available evidence. There is already for intervention a robust workforce engaged in the Drivers at this level LO O primary prevention of violence against women in Victoria, with an established L L LO O X Rigid gender norms reach, practice base and coordinated X Cisnormativity #E LG QUBTIQ RIGAL HT IT Y A gender-transformative leadership. Meanwhile, LGBTIQ approach S X Heteronormativity community organisations are experienced in challenging cisnormativity and an ch x ow f se ge A gender-transformative approach is one a u c co nndo r heteronormativity and shifting community which addresses rigid gender norms and u Yo r re ov.a u g yo vic. attitudes through health promotion, m. bd recognises their inherent connection to community development, human rights cisnormativity and heteronormativity. This What do these approach recognises the need to address advocacy and targeted campaigns that counter myths and stigma. The resources lead to? homophobia, biphobia, transphobia and skillsets of these workforces could and intersexphobia as an integral part of X Homophobia, biphobia, broader approaches to achieve gender be combined and readily applied to the transphobia and equity. prevention of family violence experienced intersexphobia by LGBTIQ communities. X Gendered cultures It is recommended that leading Workforce development strategies are of violence organisations in the sectors engaged in #E e cost-effective and scalable, and should be primary prevention of violence against oic LG QUBTIQ Ch RIGAL My HT ITY prioritised. Initial investment could include S dy women, and in LGBTIQ health and Bo My the development of complementary wellbeing, explore building coalitions training packages to support mainstream to further understanding and action to prevention workers to understand the Essential actions LO prevent family violence experienced drivers of family violence experienced by LO by LGBTIQ communities. This could X Challenging rigid gender LGBTIQ communities, and the principles include developing shared messaging, norms, cisnormativity and for partnering in this context, and to train collaborative projects and activities, heteronormativity LGBTIQ organisations in how to apply and further development of gender- X Challenging homophobia, their existing community engagement transformative primary prevention models biphobia, transphobia and and advocacy skills to preventing family and interventions. intersexphobia violence. An ongoing professional Coalition-building will also be important network and community of practice in minimising resistance to social change, could also be established to support and responding to backlash. ongoing learning.
Responding to #E LG QUBTIQ RI AL drivers at system GH TS ITY and institutional level Initial priorities for intervention ic e o Ch LO My LO Civil society advocacy Drivers at this level As in mainstream primary prevention, ody y B political, sector-specific and civil society M X Inequality in recognition leadership is critical to promoting of bodies, identities and equal recognition and celebration relationships of LGBTIQ people. Initial investment at this level could focus on testing existing civil society primary prevention advocacy techniques shown What do these to be effective in working towards gender lead to? equity, to support coalition-building Media around campaigns for equality for LGBTIQ people. Existing advisory guidelines produced X Invalidation of identities #E LG QUBTIQ g e an by the Australian Press Council cover and relationships RI AL ITY ch ex ow f s Programs could also be provided to GH TS nndo the reporting of family violence, as X Loss of bodily autonomy a r LGBTIQ human rights advocates and u c co u well as reporting on people with X Discrimination Yo r re ov.a u g community leaders to assist them in yo vic. LGBTIQ identities. In future discussion X Failure of responses to m . understanding the role of their work in bd around guidelines and the quality of violence the primary prevention of family violence, ce Australian media reporting, advocates Ch oi LOand how this complements the work of My should continue to raise the harm dy the sector L engaged in primary prevention created by negative O LO and stereotypical Bo My of violence against women. representation ofLGBTIQ people and LOrepresentation. seek to promote positive Essential actions Key messages could also be integrated Legislative reform Y GB TIQ IT L AL QU into existing media engagement S HT #E IG R X Promoting equal #E LG QU programs focussed on violence Y BT IT IQ BT IQ AL RI AL LG recognition and QU Y ITY Current government and sector-led S #E HT GB TIQ IT GH AL RIG L TS against women. QUHTS #E RIG celebration of LGBTIQ strategies tend to conceptualise LGBTIQ Y IT IQ BT equality and gender equality as separate AL Further investment could be made in LG bodies, identities and QU S HT #E RIG relationships areas of focus. Consideration should state-based guidance around positive X Integration of family be given to building on strategies, such media representation of LGBTIQ bodies, #E LGB as Safe and Strong: A Victorian gender QU TIQand identities, families and relationships, violence experienced RI AL equality strategy, to acknowledge the G ITY by LGBTIQ communities to support the responsible reportingHTSof in primary prevention importance of addressing equality for issues impacting LGBTIQ communities, responses LGBTIQ people as key to achieving gender including family violence, hate crimes equality for all. and suicide.
Responding to drivers Community at organisational and mobilisation Initial priorities community level for intervention Attention should be given to strategies that improve awareness in families with LGBTIQ family members and encourage access to support. Other interventions could draw on the successful mobilisation of the broader LGBTIQ-community-led community around LGBTIQ-specific issues prevention campaigns (e.g. marriage equality), with the aim of including family violence prevention. LGBTIQ community organisations should be supported to develop primary Existing primary prevention interventions prevention messaging and resources. targeting violence against women Drivers at this level These can target LGBTIQ communities that have been effective in improving where relevant, but also be designed to be community sensitivity and responsiveness X Devaluation of bodies, distributed throughout the broader sectors should be tested in LGBTIQ communities. identities and relationships engaged in primary prevention of violence Interventions should aim to improve X Reproduction of norms against women. LGBTIQ community awareness and and stereotypes encourage early help-seeking. Primary prevention messaging guidance should be developed to support media and marketing campaigns that focus on Bystander programs responsible and positive representation of What do these LGBTIQ people, myth-busting to assist in Priority should be given to engaging and lead to? recognition of violence, and messages on mobilising bystanders throughout the how to be a good ally. Guidance should be community to challenge homophobic, X Stigma and discrimination developed around effective and ongoing biphobic, transphobic and intersexphobic X Normalisation of inequality consultation with LGBTIQ communities in behaviour and attitudes that support X Failure to recognise violence the development of primary prevention violence against LGBTIQ communities, messaging. where it is safe to do so. Existing bystander programs designed to support participants to take safe and Organisational Essential actions appropriate action to challenge gender- development based violence and violence-supporting X Supporting positive, equal attitudes and behavior could be readily and respectful LGBTIQ Guidance could be developed on adapted to include responding to relationships including measures and questions homophobia, biphobia, transphobia and and communities around gender diversity within whole-of- intersexphobia. X Promoting pride in LGBTIQ organisation gender equality strategies and workplace or community attitude LGBTIQ-community-specific bystander bodies, identities, families surveys. Other measures for LGBTIQ programs should be developed and tested and relationships inclusion are established as part of the to focus on challenging existing cultures of X Raising awareness and Rainbow Tick accreditation program, violence and the normalisation of violence community capability with associated resources and training experienced by LGBTIQ communities and to respond to violence available to organisations nationally. within LGBTIQ intimate relationships.
Responding to drivers at individual and relationship level Pride Programs There are a range of existing pride programs that focus on remedying damage caused to individuals by homophobia, biphobia and transphobia, and promoting pride in identity and Drivers at this level relationships. Opportunities should be explored to expand the capacity of X Homophobic, biphobic, existing pride programs to prevent and transphobic and respond to family violence experienced intersexphobic behaviour by LGBTIQ communities. X Normalisation of violence and abuse Initial priorities Supporting positive for intervention intimate relationships Peer programs and online resources What do these could also be funded that assist LGBTIQ lead to? Supporting families individuals to develop the skills and attitudes that support equal, respectful X Negative self-worth Existing programs for new parents and and non-violent relationships. An X Perpetration of violence other family support programs could important focus in these programs and abuse be expanded to incorporate positive should be connecting LGBTIQ people X Poorer health outcomes messaging around having a child that is with community programs and spaces LGBTIQ. There could also be an expansion that celebrate and support positive of peer programs for the parents and intimate relationships. siblings of LGBTIQ children. These programs should be recognised for Programs should also be developed to Essential actions their role in primary prevention of family support the partners of LGBTIQ people violence, in that they: to build positive and healthy intimate X Supporting families to fully relationships. This could include programs embrace LGBTIQ children X Address homophobia, biphobia, aimed at the heterosexual and cisgender and family members transphobia and intersexphobia partners of bisexual or trans and gender X Supporting positive X Promote celebration of diverse diverse people. Messages could target intimate relationships bodies, sexualities and genders shaming and silencing, with a focus X Enabling positive X Provide connections to a on building pride, respect and positive community connections supportive community community connections.
You can also read