People and jaguars: new insights into the role of social factors in an old conflict

Page created by Alice Henry
 
CONTINUE READING
People and jaguars: new insights into the role of social factors in an old conflict
People and jaguars: new insights into the role of
                social factors in an old conflict
                              FLAVIA CARUSO, PABLO G. PEROVIC, ANDRÉS TÁLAMO, CAROLINA B. TRIGO
                                       MARÍA S. ANDRADE-DÍAZ, GUSTAVO A. MARÁS, DIEGO SARAVIA
                                                  C L A U D I O S I L L E R O - Z U B I R I and M A R I A N A A L T R I C H T E R

                Abstract Throughout its range in Latin America, the jaguar                             Supplementary material for this article is available at
                Panthera onca is threatened by habitat loss and fragmenta-                             doi.org/./S
                tion, and by conflict as a result of coexistence with people.
                This Near Threatened species is a top predator, and is
                often illegally hunted. Understanding people’s attitudes and                           Introduction
                perceptions and the factors that could influence them is cru-
                cial for the conservation of this species. In this study we assess
                how knowledge, attitudes and perceptions among people in                               U       nderstanding people’s attitudes and perceptions and
                                                                                                               the factors that could influence them is crucial for the
                                                                                                       conservation of species whose coexistence with people leads
                northern Argentina regarding jaguars vary depending on
                their level of education, age and occupation. We interviewed                           to conflicts, such as in the case of large carnivores preying on
                 people living in and around  protected areas in nor-                             domestic animals (Ripple et al., ). Castaño-Uribe et al.
                thern Argentina. Positive perceptions and attitudes towards                            () highlight the extent and complexity of human–
                the jaguar were associated with economic benefits that people                          felid conflicts in Latin America, where the jaguar Panthera
                may receive from the species’ presence, such as income from                            onca, categorized as Near Threatened on the IUCN Red
                tourism. Unexpectedly, higher levels of formal education                               List (Quigley et al., ), provides a poignant example of
                were not associated with more positive attitudes and percep-                           this conservation challenge (Botero-Cruz et al., ; Caruso
                tions. Negative attitudes and perceptions towards the species                          et al., ; Marchini et al., ).
                were determined by fear; people see jaguars as a threat to their                           The largest reduction (%) of the species’ range has
                lives. This study shows that the socio-economic factors that                           occurred in Argentina, where remaining populations
                affect the level of tolerance towards jaguars are not related                          are confined to small and probably disconnected areas
                only to economic losses. Our findings provide information                              in the Yungas, the Chaco and the Atlantic Forest. For
                for the design, implementation and evaluation of jaguar                                these reasons, the species is categorized nationally as
                conservation projects in Argentina.                                                    Critically Endangered (Perovic & Herrán, ; Altrichter
                                                                                                       et al., ; Aprile et al., ; Di Bitetti et al., ).
                Keywords Argentina, conservation, human–wildlife conflict,                             The species’ current range in Argentina is c. , km,
                jaguar, Panthera onca, semi-arid Chaco, social perceptions,                            .–.% of its historical range in the country (Di
                Yungas                                                                                 Bitetti et al., ). This range contraction is a result of
                                                                                                       conversion of natural habitats to livestock pasture and
                                                                                                       farmland, habitat fragmentation, reduction of natural
                FLAVIA CARUSO*† (Corresponding author,     orcid.org/0000-0001-9703-081X),             prey and illegal hunting (De Ángelo, ; Perovic
                ANDRÉS TÁLAMO‡§, CAROLINA B. TRIGO‡§, MARÍA S. ANDRADE-DÍAZ‡§ and
                GUSTAVO A. MARÁS‡§ Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y
                                                                                                       et al., ; Di Bitetti et al., ). Hunting was formerly
                Tecnológicas, Leguizamón 366, Salta, Argentina. E-mail flavicl@hotmail.com             practiced for pelt commercialization, but the species con-
                PABLO G. PEROVIC† Administración de Parques Nacionales, Dirección Regional             tinues to be persecuted because of predation on livestock
                Noroeste-DRNOA, Salta, Argentina                                                       and because it is perceived as a threat to human life
                DIEGO SARAVIA Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta,           (Perovic, ; Altrichter, ; Altrichter et al., ;
                Salta, Argentina                                                                       Perovic et al., ).
                CLAUDIO SILLERO-ZUBIRI† Wildlife Conservation Research Unit, Department of                 Large carnivores such as the jaguar have cascading ef-
                Zoology, University of Oxford, The Recanati-Kaplan Centre, Tubney, UK,
                and Born Free Foundation, Horsham, UK
                                                                                                       fects on ecological communities and ecosystem func-
                                                                                                       tioning (Ripple et al., ). The jaguar’s requirement for
                MARIANA ALTRICHTER Prescott College, Prescott, USA
                                                                                                       extensive and continuous habitat and its dependence on
                *Also at: Administración de Parques Nacionales, Dirección Regional Noroeste,
                Salta, Argentina                                                                       large prey species often result in overlap with local farm-
                †Also at: Jaguares en el Límite, Salta, Argentina                                      ers and settlers, which increases the potential for conflicts
                ‡Also at: Instituto de Bio y Geo-ciencias del NOA-IBIGEO, Salta, Argentina             (Conforti & De Azevedo, ; De Azevedo, ) and
                §Also at: Facultad de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Salta, Salta,
                Argentina                                                                              the risk of persecution and eradication (Paviolo, ).
                Received  July . Revision requested  October .                              Jaguar conservation could be facilitated by taking into ac-
                Accepted  December . First published online  January .                     count its role in ecosystems and the need to generate a

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
People and jaguars              679

              change in people’s attitudes and actions (Ripple et al.,                               attitudes and perceptions of local people towards jaguars
              ).                                                                                 have not been studied in the northern region of Argentina,
                  Understanding how people perceive the jaguar and                                   hindering the promotion of coexistence between people
              which factors influence attitudes will help shape conserva-                            and jaguars.
              tion to protect the remaining populations. Perceptions are                                 In this context our objective was to identify which socio-
              understood as a hierarchy of knowledge that ranges from                                economic factors (level of education, age, and occupation)
              the basic knowledge of an individual about an object,                                  could explain the level of knowledge, perceptions and atti-
              in this case the jaguar, to cognitive properties as beliefs                            tudes regarding jaguars in northern Argentina. As attitudes
              (Dickman et al., ). An attitude is a person’s favourable                           towards wildlife may be influenced by past and present in-
              or unfavourable evaluation of an object (e.g. a species, a                             teractions (Kellert et al., ), we hypothesized that () nega-
              management action). Attitudes have both cognitive and                                  tive perceptions and attitudes towards jaguars would more
              evaluative elements; i.e. a combination of beliefs and nega-                           likely be found among older people and, based on previous
              tive and/or positive views about an object (Pierce et al.,                             studies, we also expected that () negative perceptions
              ).                                                                                 would be found among livestock farmers and those with
                  Perceptions of and attitudes towards large carnivores are                          lower educational levels.
              not solely determined by direct costs associated with living
              alongside them, such as a livestock predation (Treves &
              Bruskotter, ), but rather they are ‘the product of a dy-                           Study area
              namic and complex net of social factors such as age, educa-
              tional level, main economic occupation of the people, and                              The study was carried out in and around  Protected Areas
              cultural factors’ (Dickman et al., , p. ). For example,                         in the Yungas and Chaco ecoregions of Jujuy, Salta, Santiago
              perceptions and attitudes towards large carnivores tend to                             del Estero and Chaco provinces (Table ). Their selection
              be more positive among young people (Williams et al.,                                  was driven by the importance of these areas for the re-
              ) and those with higher levels of formal education                                 maining jaguars of northern Argentina (Perovic et al.,
              (Consorte-McCrea et al., ). Hostile attitudes, on the                              ; Palacios, ; Ramadori et al., ; Fig. ).
              other hand, are more frequently found among people                                         Lying along the eastern slopes of the Andes from
              whose primary occupation is livestock husbandry (Porfirio                              Venezuela to north-west Argentina (Cabrera & Willink, ),
              et al., ).                                                                         the Yungas is a fragile and threatened ecoregion com-
                  Socio-cultural factors, such as popular beliefs, also af-                          prising , km in Argentina, of which .% is protect-
              fect attitudes towards carnivores; thus social attitudes are                           ed (Brown et al., ). Annual rainfall is –, mm,
              closely connected to individual lifestyles and, once estab-                            concentrated in the summer rains during December–April.
              lished, become deep-rooted (Naughton-Treves et al., ).                             During the cold months, rainfall ceases and condensation
              Jaguars tend to generate multiple emotions, ranging from                               from the mists that characterize these cloud forests is
              admiration to irrational terror (Hoogesteijn et al., ).                            important for water uptake (Burkart et al., ). The mean
              For some people the presence of large carnivores may                                   seasonal temperature varies from  °C in winter to  °C in
              produce positive feelings such as joy, whereas for others                              summer (Ibisch et al., ). The main economic activities are
              it may evoke negative feelings such as fear (Altrichter et al.,                        extensive livestock farming, small-scale agriculture, extensive
              ; Johansson & Karlsson, ; Jacobs et al., ). Wild-                          tobacco and sugar farming, selective logging, and fossil fuel
              life knowledge can influence attitudes towards large fe-                               extraction. Nature-based tourism is an emerging activity
              lids, and reduce fear and conflict (Marchini & Macdonald,                              (Perovic et al., ). Illegal hunting of jaguars and their
              ; Porfirio et al., ; Engel et al., ). Previous                             prey is common throughout the region (Perovic, ;
              research has also shown that people with more formal                                   Chalukian et al., ). Until c. , the jaguar occurred
              education express greater appreciation of and/or concern                               throughout the Yungas ecoregion (Perovic et al., ), but
              for protection of species than those with less formal educa-                           its current distribution is restricted to an area of , km
              tion (Kellert et al., ; Luksenburg & Parsons, ).                               in Jujuy and Salta provinces, c. % of its original range.
                  In Argentina little is known about the socio-economic                              The species has a high probability of survival in % of this
              factors that influence people’s perceptions of and attitudes                           area as a result of the geo-environmental heterogeneity and
              towards jaguars. For example, in Misiones and Corrientes                               remoteness from human activities (Perovic et al., ).
              the species is culturally important and is valued positive-                                The semi-arid Chaco is located in the central Chaco eco-
              ly, even though it disappeared in Corrientes  years ago                              region, which extends over . million km, covering parts
              (Paviolo, ; Caruso & Jiménez Pérez, ), whereas in                              of Argentina, Paraguay and Bolivia, with c. , km
              the Chaco it is considered dangerous and is perceived in                               in Argentina (Dinerstein et al., ). The climate is mark-
              negative terms (Altrichter et al., ). Thus perceptions                             edly seasonal, with a mean annual temperature of  °C
              and attitudes are context-specific (Caruso et al., ). The                          and annual rainfall of – mm concentrated in

              Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
680         F. Caruso et al.

                TABLE 1 Protected areas included in this study, by Province, with ecoregion, area and category, whether the jaguar Panthera onca has been
                recorded and settlers are present, and the number of interviews that we conducted. Priority areas for the conservation of the jaguar in
                Argentina are indicated with *.

                                                                                                Area                                     Jaguar                           No. of
                Province                    Protected area          Ecoregion                   (ha)          Category                   presence            Settlers     interviews
                Salta                       Baritú*                 Yungas                         724        National Park              Frequent            Yes           31
                                            El Nogalar de           Yungas                         325        National Park              Frequent            Yes           96
                                            los Toldos*
                                            El Rey                  Yungas–Semi-arid               442        National Park              Extinct             No            14
                                                                    Chaco
                                            Pizarro                 Yungas–Semi-arid               784        National Reserve           Extinct             Yes           82
                                                                    Chaco
                                            Los Palmares            Semi-arid Chaco                 60        Provincial Reserve         Extinct             No            27
                                            Acambuco*               Yungas–Semi-arid               330        Provincial Reserve         Frequent            Yes           81
                                                                    Chaco
                Jujuy                       Calilegua*              Yungas                        763         National Park              Regular             No           139
                                            Las Lancitas            Yungas–Chaco                   95         Provincial Reserve         Occasional          Yes           39
                Santiago del Estero         Copo                    Semi-arid Chaco             1,181         National Park              Occasional          Yes          242
                Chaco                       El Impenetrable         Semi-arid Chaco             1,298         National Park              Likely              No            59
                Total                                                                                                                                                     810

                October–April (Caziani et al., ). Three rivers cross the                           the region, occupation and level of education. The pilot
                semi-arid Argentine Chaco from north-west to south-east,                               test also helped us to refine the type, format and wording
                but large parts of the region lack permanent water sources                             of the questions, to avoid ambiguity. We were also guided
                other than artificial ponds constructed for livestock (Caziani                         by our own experience in the region and our familiarity
                et al., ). The main economic activities are agriculture                            with the local culture, as well as the results of our previous
                and extensive cattle husbandry and logging (Fahrig, ),                             research projects.
                which have resulted in habitat fragmentation and other al-                                After the pilot test was completed, we interviewed 
                terations of the natural environment (Periago et al., ).                           women and  men who had lived in the area for at least
                Subsistence hunting is commonly practiced by rural settlers                             years, using a structured questionnaire, in Spanish, with
                (Altrichter, ). As a result of these anthropogenic im-                             open and closed questions in four sections: () profile of
                pacts, the jaguar population of the semi-arid Argentine                                the interviewee (age, place of residence, time living in the
                Chaco is the most threatened in the country (Quiroga,                                  region, occupation and level of education), () attitudes
                ); the species’ potential range in this area is c.  km                         towards jaguars, () perceptions of jaguars, and () know-
                (Quiroga, ).                                                                       ledge of the ecological role of jaguars.
                                                                                                          The independent variables were: () education, coded
                                                                                                       according to the highest level of formal education reached
                Methods                                                                                by the interviewees (no school; elementary, st–th grade;
                                                                                                       secondary, th–th grade; college; () age (young, –
                During – we interviewed % of the people living                               years; adult, –; older, – years); and () occupation,
                in and around (,  km) the  protected areas, using                                  coded according to how the interviewees passed most of
                convenience sampling, a non-random method used to                                      their time and/or their main source of income (farming
                create samples according to ease of access and people’s                                and cattle ranching; college or school student; tourism;
                availability to be part of the sample (Kothari, ). We                              other). The category other (% of the interviewees) in-
                conducted a pilot test to help design an effective and effi-                           cluded homekeepers, teachers and government employees.
                cient questionnaire, during which we interviewed  peo-                                 To determine attitudes towards jaguars we asked: Do you
                ple of different socio-economic and educational profiles,                              support jaguar conservation in the region? For perceptions
                to obtain a representative and balanced sample. We first                               towards jaguars, we asked two questions: How would you
                explained the project’s objectives to potential interviewees                           feel if the jaguar became extinct in the region, and what
                and only conducted an interview if the person consented                                would you feel if you came across a jaguar in the forest?
                verbally. We coded and analysed the responses to deter-                                To determine knowledge about jaguars, we asked: Could
                mine if the definition of the problem was adequate and                                 you describe the ecological role that the jaguar plays in the
                to limit the profile of the desired sample by defining key                             ecosystem? For this last question we evaluated each re-
                variables such as age, place of residence, time living in                              sponse of the interviewees and considered correct those

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
People and jaguars              681

                                                                                                                                               FIG. 1 Study area, protected
                                                                                                                                               areas (NP, National Park;
                                                                                                                                               NR, National Reserve; PR,
                                                                                                                                               Provincial Reserve; Table )
                                                                                                                                               and the current range of the
                                                                                                                                               jaguar Panthera onca in the
                                                                                                                                               Yungas (Perovic et al., )
                                                                                                                                               and Chaco (Quiroga et al.,
                                                                                                                                               ) in north-west Argentina.

              that mentioned concepts related to jaguars as top predators                            Support for jaguar conservation More (%) support for
              affecting the functioning of the ecosystem.                                            jaguar conservation was found among people with elementary
                                                                                                     education (Fig. a). The odds that interviewees would be in
                                                                                                     favour of conservation were higher among interviewees with
              Data analysis                                                                          elementary and secondary education in comparison with
                                                                                                     those with no education (odds_ratioelementary = ., P = .;
              The response variables were: () support for jaguar conserva-                          odds_ratiosecondary = ., P = .), but interviewees with a
              tion (support, no support, undecided); () identification of                           college degree did not have higher odds of supporting
              the ecological role that the jaguar plays in the ecosystem (cor-                       conservation (odds_ratio = ., P = .). Older interviewees
              rect identification, incorrect identification); () feelings about                     (%) tended to support the protection of jaguars (Fig. b),
              jaguar extinction (sad, happy, indifferent), and () feelings                          with the odds of being in favour of jaguar conservation
              about an encounter with a jaguar (fear, joy, indifference).                            higher for adults and older people than for younger
              To test our two hypotheses and identify factors (level of                              people (odds_ratioadult = ., P = .; odds_ratioolder = .,
              education, age classes, occupation) that could potentially                             P , .). Occupation also influenced the level of sup-
              explain the response variables, we built a series of multi-                            port, with people engaged in tourism (%) tending to sup-
              nomial logistic regression models for response variables                               port the protection of jaguars (Fig. c). If the person was a
              with more than two categories, and a logistic regression                               student or tourism worker the odds of being in favour of
              model for binary responses. The Akaike information criter-                             the protection of the species were higher compared to farm-
              ion (AIC; Akaike, ) was used to evaluate the best model.                           ers and cattle ranchers (odds_ratiofarmers and cattle ranchers = .,
              The R (R Core Team, ) package nnet was used for                                    P = .; odds_ratiotourism = ,,, P = .; Supplementary
              building multinomial logistic regression models, package                               Table ).
              MuMIn for model selection (Kuznetsova et al., ), and
              the glm function with a binominal family for logistic
              regression.                                                                            Identification of the jaguar’s ecological role A higher pro-
                                                                                                     portion of interviewees who recognized the ecological role of
                                                                                                     the species had elementary (%) and college education (%;
              Results                                                                                Fig. d). The odds that people with college education recog-
                                                                                                     nized the ecological role of the jaguar were higher than for
              We found that level of education, age and occupation were                              people without education (odds_ratio = ., P = .). The
              all predictors of the four response variables (Table ).                               odds that people with secondary education recognized the

              Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
682         F. Caruso et al.

                TABLE 2 Multinomial logistic regression models for responses to four questions regarding the jaguar. Models are ranked according to their
                ΔAIC and weighting.

                Model                                                       df               Log-likelihood                   AICc1                  ΔAICc2                   wAICc3
                Do you support jaguar conservation in the region? (Support, no support, undecided)
                Age class + Education + Occupation             18            −683,503                    1403.9                                        0                         0.9
                Age class + Occupation                         12            −692,230                    1408.9                                        4.9                       0
                Education + Occupation                         14            −707,117                    1442.8                                       38.8                       0
                Occupation                                      8            −713,601                    1443.4                                       39.5                       0
                Age class + Education                          12            −739,322                    1503.0                                       99.1                       0
                Age class                                       6            −750,471                    1513.0                                      109.1                       0
                Education                                       8            −754,038                    1524.3                                      120.3                       0
                Null                                            2            −766,247                    1536.5                                      132.6                       0
                How would you feel if the jaguar became extinct in the region? (Sad, happy, indifferent)
                Age class + Education + Occupation             18            −693,153                    1423.2                                        0                         0.9
                Education + Occupation                         14            −700,413                    1429.4                                        6.1                       0
                Age class + Occupation                         12            −710,515                    1445.4                                       22.2                       0
                Occupation                                      8            −719,365                    1454.9                                       31.7                       0
                Education                                       8            −739,758                    1495.7                                       72.5                       0
                Age class + Education                          12            −735,665                    1495.7                                       72.5                       0
                Age class                                       6            −768,931                    1550.0                                      126.8                       0
                Null                                            2            −777,973                    1560.0                                      136.7                       0
                What would you feel if you came across a jaguar in the forest? (Fear, joy, indifference)
                Age class + Education + Occupation             18            −523,033                    1082.9                                         0                        0.7
                Age class + Occupation                         12            −530,254                    1084.9                                         1.9                      0.2
                Age class + Education                          12            −544,105                    1112.6                                        29.6                      0
                Education + Occupation                         14            −543,324                    1115.2                                        32.2                      0
                Occupation                                      8            −552,024                    1120.2                                        37.3                      0
                Age class                                       6            −554,393                    1120.9                                        37.9                      0
                Education                                       8            −558,545                    1133.3                                        50.3                      0
                Null                                            2            −574,734                    1153.5                                        70.5                      0
                Could you describe the ecological role that the jaguar plays in the ecosystem? (Correct, incorrect)
                Age class + Education + Occupation              9            −382.6                       783.6                                        0                      985.0
                Education + Occupation                          7            −389.1                       792.4                                        8.7                     12.0
                Age class + Occupation                          6            −391.5                       795.2                                       11.6                      3.0
                Age class + Education                           6            −454.8                       921.8                                      138.2                      0
                
                 Akaike information criterion corrected for small sample sizes.
                
                  Difference in AICc between best model and each individual model.
                
                  Model Akaike weight.

                ecological role of the species tended to be lower compared                             (Fig. g). The odds that the person would feel sad if the jaguar
                to people without education (odds_ratio = ., P = .).                             were to go extinct were greater for those with elementary
                Most adults (%) and elders (%) did not recognize the                               (odds_ratio = ., P = .) or secondary education (odds_
                ecological role of the species, whereas the majority of                                ratio = ., P = .) compared to people without educa-
                young people (%) did recognize this (Fig. e). However,                              tion. Most young (%) interviewees felt sadness at the
                only the odds of the elders tended to be lower than                                    possible extinction of the jaguar (Fig. h), and for adults or
                the odds of the young (odds_ratioadult = −., P = .;                              elders the odds of feeling sad were lower compared to youn-
                odds_ratioelders = −., P = .). Knowledge also varied                             ger people (odds_ratioadult = ., P = .; odds_ratioolder =
                according to occupation. Most students (%) recognized                                ., P = .). Most people engaged in tourism (%) felt
                the ecological role of the species (Fig. f), with the odds of                         sadness at the possible extinction of the jaguar (Fig. i), with
                recognizing the ecological role of the jaguar higher for stu-                          the odds that an interviewee would feel sad about the possible
                dents compared to people engaged in farming and cattle                                 extinction of the jaguar considerably higher if the person was
                ranching (odds_ratio = ., P , .; Supplementary                                 a tourism worker (odds_ratio = ., P , .) compared
                Table ).                                                                              to farmers and cattle ranchers (Supplementary Table ).

                Feelings about jaguar extinction The majority of intervie-                             Feelings about an encounter with a jaguar Regardless of
                wees who completed secondary (%) and elementary school                               level of education, age and occupation, most interviewees
                (%) felt sadness at the possible extinction of the jaguar                            indicated they would feel fear in any potential encounter

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
People and jaguars              683

                                                                                                                                               FIG. 2 Relationships between
                                                                                                                                               the responses variables
                                                                                                                                               Support for jaguar
                                                                                                                                               conservation (a–c),
                                                                                                                                               Identification of the ecological
                                                                                                                                               role that the jaguar plays in the
                                                                                                                                               ecosystem (d–f), Feelings
                                                                                                                                               about jaguar extinction (g–i),
                                                                                                                                               and Feelings about an
                                                                                                                                               encounter with a jaguar (j–l),
                                                                                                                                               and the independent variables
                                                                                                                                               education, age class and
                                                                                                                                               occupation.

              with a jaguar (Fig. ); this was least amongst farmers and                             support, jaguar conservation initiatives could consider pro-
              cattle ranchers (%; Fig. l). Interviewees with a college                            motion of economic alternatives such as tourism for people
              education had the highest percentage (%) of indifference                             living within the species’ range. Charismatic large felids tend
              to a possible encounter with a jaguar (Fig. j), with this the                         to appeal to a wide audience and are therefore valuable to
              only education category that had a high proportion of in-                              nature-based tourism, although the chance of spotting an
              difference compared to the category no formal education                                individual in the wild is limited (Skibins et al., ). In nor-
              (odds_ratio = ., P = .). Most young (%), adult (%)                          thern Argentina nature-based tourism is a relatively recent
              and older people (%) expressed fear in relation to a                                 endeavour, taking place primarily on private land and in a
              possible encounter with the species (Fig. k). The odds                                few protected areas (Perovic et al., ). All interviewees en-
              that the person would feel joy in encountering a jaguar                                gaged in tourism-related activities supported jaguar conser-
              were lower for adults or elders compared to young people                               vation, which was similar in Corrientes, where the majority
              (odds_ratioadult = ., P , .; odds_ratioolder = .,                           of local people agreed to a reintroduction plan for jaguars,
              P = .). If the person was a student the odds of feeling                            identifying a potential income source (Caruso & Jiménez
              joy at an encounter were lower compared to farmers and cat-                            Pérez, ). However, we found that people engaged in
              tle ranchers (odds_ratio = ., P , .; Supplementary                             tourism did not understand the ecological role of the spe-
              Table ).                                                                              cies; i.e. they were interested in jaguars mainly as a generator
                                                                                                     of income. This indicates the need to foster greater aware-
                                                                                                     ness in the local emerging tourism industry, and a need
              Discussion                                                                             for education that emphasizes values associated with the
                                                                                                     existence of jaguars beyond their economic value.
              We sought to address the socio-economic factors that influ-                                Jaguars are considered the sole or principal cause of live-
              ence people’s perceptions of jaguars in the southernmost                               stock loss in the Argentine Yungas (Perovic, ), and thus
              area of its distribution. In general, we found that positive                           as long as the current land use and farming system con-
              perceptions and attitudes towards jaguars seem to be strongly                          tinues, negative attitudes towards jaguars are likely to persist.
              influenced by people’s occupation. This could be related to                            However, we found that support for jaguar conservation
              the economic benefits that people receive from the presence                            among cattle ranchers was relatively high (%), a finding
              of jaguars (in this case, tourism). Thus, to gain more social                          that could be explained by the ranchers’ repeated comments

              Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
684         F. Caruso et al.

                on compensation or other economic benefits of livestock                                highlighted the importance of information (i.e. the value
                losses. Given that ranchers pose a direct threat to jaguars                            of the species) in increasing acceptance of the American
                through retaliatory killings (Perovic et al., ), interventions                     black bear Ursus americanus (Slagle et al., ). Factors
                that seek to make them more interested in jaguar conserva-                             explaining attitudes and perceptions are context-specific
                tion could positively impact the status of this species in the                         (Paviolo, ; Caruso & Jiménez Pérez, ). Our study
                southern fringes of its distribution.                                                  showed that factors explaining attitudes and perceptions
                    Fear for personal safety and a lack of knowledge of a pre-                         vary mostly in relation to people’s occupation, and can
                dator’s ecological importance can generate negative social                             determine the level of tolerance towards jaguars. These
                perceptions and, hence, the persecution and death of jaguars                           findings corroborate earlier research (Caruso et al., ;
                (Soto-Shoender & Main, ). Our findings do not support                              Tortato et al., ), showing that the benefits of tourism
                our two hypotheses: we found that the majority of people                               greatly exceed the losses caused by predation, and increased
                with secondary education and young people were afraid of                               the acceptance of jaguars.
                encountering a jaguar in the forest, and were convinced they                              Considering attitudes and social factors is essential for
                could be attacked, whereas few ranchers expressed fear of                              understanding and elucidating ways to mitigate conflicts,
                an encounter. However, ranchers were also convinced that                               design educational programmes and implement conserva-
                jaguars could attack people. Fear is an emotion that can be                            tion projects. In Argentina, promoting tourism could be
                learned or is innate (i.e. a consequence of biological evolu-                          an economic alternative compatible with jaguar conserva-
                tion; Jacobs, ). Fear for personal safety amongst people                           tion and could increase the level of appreciation of the exis-
                with secondary education and amongst young people could                                tence of the species, thus fostering positive attitudes.
                be a result of lack of knowledge about the jaguar and of
                attitudes associated with familiar and popular beliefs; i.e.                           Acknowledgements We thank the Consejo Nacional de Investiga-
                                                                                                       ciones Científicas y Tecnológicas (CONICET) and Administración de
                without having had direct experience with the species                                  Parques Nacionales for providing institutional support, and Fondation
                (McGovern & Kretser, ). It is possible that the lower                              Segré, The Rufford Foundation, IdeaWild and WildCRU for financial
                proportion of ranchers expressing fear is based on their                               support. We are grateful to the volunteers who helped with fieldwork,
                experiences of encounters with jaguars (in most cases,                                 Mauricio Núñez Regueiro for advice on data analysis, Leonidas Lizar-
                when a rancher encounters a jaguar the animal is killed;                               raga for GIS support, María Schulze and Ximena Uriburu for transla-
                                                                                                       tion, and the anonymous reviewers whose critiques improved the text.
                Perovic, ). These findings accord with a study in the
                tropical lowlands of Guatemala, where % of interviewees                              Author contributions Planning and research design: FC, PP, MA;
                believed that jaguars were a threat to people (Soto-Shoender                           fieldwork: FC; data analysis: FC, AT, DS; writing: all authors.
                & Main, ). Hoogesteijn et al. () found that jaguars
                do not pose a danger to people’s physical integrity; of                             Conflict of interest None.
                jaguar sightings reviewed, only a single attack on humans
                                                                                                       Ethical standards This article derives from research carried out as
                was reported, which involved a mock attack by a male                                   part of FC’s doctoral thesis. The National University of Salta and the
                guarding a female in heat.                                                             thesis Committee reviewed the research proposal and provided ethical
                    Fear of jaguars varies depending on people’s knowledge                             approval. This research abided by the Oryx guidelines on ethical
                (Cavalcanti et al., ), with some correlation between for-                          standards.
                mal education and support for conservation (Williams et al.,
                ). Few of our interviewees, however, had an under-
                standing of the ecological importance of jaguars in main-                              References
                taining the integrity of natural ecosystems, and we found
                                                                                                       A K A I K E , H. () A new look at the statistical model identification.
                there was no clear relationship between people’s knowledge                                IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, , –.
                about the ecological role of the species and their level                               A LT R I C H T E R , M. () Wildlife in the life of local people of the semi-arid
                of formal education. This suggests that formal education                                  Argentine Chaco. Biodiversity and Conservation, , –.
                is insufficient on its own; education about conservation                               A LT R I C H T E R , M., B OA G L I O , G. & P E R O V I C , P. () The decline
                should be locally-based and planned, inside and outside of                                of jaguars Panthera onca in the Argentine Chaco. Oryx, ,
                                                                                                          –.
                schooling.
                                                                                                       A P R I L E , G., C U Y C K E N S , E., D E A N G E LO , C., D I B I T E T T I , M.,
                    Promoting greater tolerance towards wildlife and thus re-                             L U C H E R I N I , M. & M U Z Z A C H I O D I , N. () Familia: Felidae.
                ducing the killing of jaguars also depends on people’s will-                              In Libro Rojo de Mamíferos Amenazados de la Argentina (eds
                ingness to live with wildlife (Ripple et al., ). Improving                            R.A. Ojeda, V. Chillo & G.B. Díaz Isenrath), pp. –. Sociedad
                the level of understanding of jaguar biology and ecology                                  Argentina para el Estudio de los Mamíferos (SAREM), Argentina.
                                                                                                       B O T E R O -C R U Z , A.M., R O D R Í G U E Z -C A S T E L L A N O S , P., M A R T Í N E Z -
                among the people that share the space with the species
                                                                                                          C A L L E J A S , S., T R U J I L LO , F. & M O S Q U E R A -G U E R R A , F.
                will probably reduce fear, increase tolerance and reduce                                  () Percepción y patrones de conflicto entre felinos y
                hunting (Marchini & Macdonald, ; Porfirio et al.,                                     comunidades locales en la cuenca media y baja del río Guaviare,
                ). In further support of this idea, Slagle et al. ()                              Colombia. In II. Conflicto entre Felinos y Humanos en América

                                                                                           Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
People and jaguars               685

                 Latina (eds C. Castaño-Uribe, C.A. Lasso, R. Hoogesteijn &                                              Cultura Económica, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,
                 E. Payán-Garrido), pp. –. Serie Editorial Fauna Silvestre                                         Mexico City, Mexico.
                 Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos                                     D I C K M A N , A., M A R C H I N I , S. & M A N F R E D O , M. () The human
                 Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.                                                               dimension in addressing conflict with large carnivores. In Key
              B R O W N , A.D., G R A U , A., L O M Á S C O LO , T. & G A S P A R R I , N.I. ()                      Topics in Conservation Biology  (eds D. Macdonald & K.J. Willis),
                 Una estrategia de conservación para las selvas subtropicales de                                         pp. –. John Wiley & Sons, London, UK.
                 montaña (Yungas) de Argentina. Ecotrópicos, , –.                                           D I N E R S T E I N , E., O L S O N , D.M., G R A H A M , D.J., W E B S T E R , A.L., P I M M ,
              B U R K A R T , R., B Á R B A R O , N.O., S Á N C H E Z , R.O. & G Ó M E Z , D.A. ()                   S.A., B O O K B I N D E R , M.P. et al. (eds) () A Conservation
                 Eco-regiones de la Argentina. Presidencia de la Nación-Secretaría de                                    Assessment of the Terrestrial Ecoregions of Latin America and the
                 Recursos Naturales y Desarrollo Sustentable-Administración de                                           Caribbean. The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
                 Parques Nacionales, San Martin, Argentina.                                                         E N G E L , M.T., V A S K E , J.J., M A R C H I N I , S. & B AT H , A.J. ()
              C A B R E R A , A.L. & W I L L I N K , A. () Regiones biogeográficas                                   Knowledge about big cats matters: insights for conservationists and
                 en América Latina. In Biogeografía de América Latina                                                    managers. Wildlife Society Bulletin, , –.
                 (ed. E. Chesneau), pp. –. Secretaría de la Organización                                       F A H R I G , L. () Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity.
                 de los Estados Americanos, Programa de Desarrollo Científico                                            Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, ,
                 y Tecnológico. Washington, DC, USA.                                                                     –.
              C A R U S O , F. & J I M É N E Z P É R E Z , I. () Tourism, local pride, and                      H O O G E S T E I J N , R., H O O G E S T E I J N , A., T O R TA R O , F.R., R A M P I N , L.E.,
                 attitudes towards the reintroduction of a large predator, the jaguar                                    V I L A S B OA S -C O N C O N E , H., M AY -J U N I O R , J.A. et al. ()
                 Panthera onca in Corrientes, Argentina. Endangered Species                                              Conservación de jaguares (Panthera onca) fuera de áreas protegidas:
                 Research, , –.                                                                                  turismo de observación de jaguares en propiedades privadas del
              C A R U S O , F., P E R OV I C , P.G. & A LT R I C H T E R , M. () Actitudes y                         Pantanal, Brasil. In Conservación de Grandes Vertebrados en Áreas
                 percepciones sociales ante el jaguar (Panthera onca) en el noroeste                                     no Protegidas de Colombia, Venezuela y Brasil (eds E. Payán
                 argentino. In II. Conflicto entre Felinos y Humanos en América                                          Garrido, C.A. Lasso & C. Castaño-Uribe) pp. –. Instituto de
                 Latina (eds C. Castaño-Uribe, C.A. Lasso, R. Hoogesteijn &                                              Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt,
                 E. Payán-Garrido), pp. –. Serie Editorial Fauna Silvestre                                         Bogotá, Colombia.
                 Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos                                     I B I S C H , P.L., B E C K , S.G., G E R K M A N N , B. & C A R R E T E R O , A. ()
                 Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.                                                               Ecorregiones y ecosistemas. In Biodiversidad: la Riqueza de Bolivia.
              C A S T A Ñ O - U R I B E , C., L A S S O , C.A., H O O G E S T E I J N , R. &                             Estado de Conocimiento y Conservación (eds P.L. Ibisch &
                 P A Y Á N -G A R R I D O , E. (eds) () II. Conflicto entre Felinos y                                G. Mérida), pp. –. Ministerio de Desarrollo Sostenible y
                 Humanos en América Latina. Serie Editorial Fauna Silvestre                                              Planificación, Editorial FAN, Santa Cruz, Bolivia.
                 Neotropical, p. . Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos                             J AC O B S , M.H. () Why do we like or dislike animals? Human
                 Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.                                                               Dimensions of Wildlife, , –.
              C AVA L C A N T I , S.M.C., M A R C H I N I , S., Z I M M E R M A N N , A., G E S E , E.M. &          J AC O B S , M.H., V A S K E , J.J., D U B O I S , S. & FEHRES, P. () More
                 M AC D O N A L D , D.W. () Jaguars, livestock, and people in Brazil:                                than fear: role of emotions in acceptability of lethal control of
                 realities and perceptions behind the conflict. In Biology and                                           wolves. European Journal of Wildlife Research, , –.
                 Conservation of Wild Felids (eds D.W. Macdonald & A.J. Loveridge),                                 J O H A N S S O N , M. & K A R L S S O N , J. () Subjective experience of fear
                 pp. –. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.                                                       and the cognitive interpretation of large carnivores. Human
              CAZIANI, S., T R U C C O , C.E., P E R OV I C , P.G., T Á L A M O , A., D E R L I N D AT I ,               Dimensions of Wildlife, , –.
                 E.J. & A D Á M O L I , J. () Línea de Base y Programa de Monitoreo de                          K E L L E R T , S.R., B L AC K , M., R U S H , C.R. & B A T H , A.J. () Human
                 Biodiversidad del Parque Nacional Copo. Argentina: Administración                                       culture and large carnivore conservation in North America.
                 de Parques Nacionales. Proyecto de Conservación de la                                                   Conservation Biology, , –.
                 Biodiversidad-BIRF/GEF TF -AR, Argentina.                                                    K O T H A R I , C.R. () Research Methodology: Methods and
              C H A L U K I A N , S., D E B U S T O S , S., L I Z Á R R A G A , V A R E L A , D. P AV I O LO , A.        Techniques. New Age International, New Delhi, India.
                 & O U S E , V. () Plan de acción para la conservación del tapir                                K U Z N E T S O VA , A., B R O C K H O F F , P.B. & C H R I S T E N S E N , R.H.B. ()
                 (Tapirus terrestris) en Argentina. Tapir Specialist Group, IUCN,                                        Package ‘lmerTest’. R package version, (). cran.r-project.org/web/
                 Campo Grande, Brazil.                                                                                   packages/lmerTest/lmerTest.pdf [accessed  March ].
              C O N F O R T I , V.A. & D E A Z E V E D O , F.C.C. () Local perceptions of                       L U K S E N B U R G , J.A. & P A R S O N S , E.C.M. () Attitudes towards
                 jaguars (Panthera onca) and pumas (Puma concolor) in the Iguaçu                                         marine mammal conservation issues before the introduction of
                 National Park area, south Brazil. Biological Conservation, , –.                                whale‐watching: a case study in Aruba (southern Caribbean).
              C O N S O R T E -M C C R E A , A., N I G B U R , D. & B AT H , A. () Implications                      Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems,
                 of teenagers’ attitudes toward maned wolf conservation in Brazil.                                       , –.
                 Canid Biology & Conservation, , –.                                                           M A R C H I N I , S., E S T E R C I R A M A L H O , E., D E L T O R O -O R O Z C O , W. &
              D E Á N G E LO , C. () El paisaje del Bosque Atlántico del Alto Paraná                                 F E R R A Z , K.M.P.M.B. () Human–jaguar conflicts in Brazil: a
                 y sus efectos sobre la distribución y estructura poblacional del jaguar                                 human dimensions perspective. In II. Conflicto entre Felinos y
                 (Panthera onca) y el puma (Puma concolor). Mastozoología                                                Humanos en América Latina (eds C. Castaño-Uribe, C.A. Lasso,
                 Neotropical, , –.                                                                               R. Hoogesteijn & E. Payán-Garrido), pp. –. Serie Editorial
              D E A Z E V E D O , F.C.C. () Food habits and livestock depredation of                                 Fauna Silvestre Neotropical. Instituto de Investigación de Recursos
                 sympatric jaguars and pumas in the Iguacu National Park area,                                           Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt, Bogotá, Colombia.
                 south Brazil. Biotropica, , –.                                                             M A R C H I N I , S. & M AC D O N A L D , D.W. () Predicting ranchers’
              D I B I T E T T I , M.S., D E Á N G E LO , C., Q U I R O G A , V., A LT R I C H T E R , M.,                intention to kill jaguars: case studies in Amazonia and Pantanal.
                 P AV I O LO , A., C U Y C K E N S , G.A.E. et al. () Estado de                                      Biological Conservation, , –.
                 conservación del jaguar en Argentina. In El Jaguar en el Siglo XXI:                                M C G O V E R N , E. B. & K R E T S E R , H.E. () Predicting support for
                 la Perspectiva Continental (eds R.A. Medellín, J.A. De La Torre,                                        recolonization of mountain lions (Puma concolor) in the
                 H. Zerda, C. Chávez & G. Ceballos), pp. –. Fondo de la                                            Adirondack Park. Wildlife Society Bulletin, , –.

              Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
686         F. Caruso et al.

                N A U G H T O N -T R E V E S , L., G R O S S B E R G , R. & T R E V E S , A. () Paying     Q U I R O G A , V.A. () Ecología y conservación del yaguareté
                    for tolerance: rural citizens’ attitudes toward wolf depredation and                           (Panthera onca) y el puma (Puma concolor) en el Chaco semiárido
                    compensation. Conservation Biology, , –.                                             argentino: su relación con la disponibilidad de presas y la presencia
                P A L AC I O S , R. () Plan de Emergencia para la Conservación del                             humana en la región. Mastozoología Neotropical, , –.
                    Yaguareté en el Gran Chaco Argentino. Administración de Parques                            Q U I R O G A , V.A., B OA G L I O , G.I., N O S S , A. J. & D I B I T E T T I , M.S. ()
                    Nacionales Delegación Regional NEA, Corrientes, Argentina.                                     Critical population status of the jaguar Panthera onca in the
                P AV I O LO , A.J. () Densidad de Yaguareté (Panthera onca) en la                              Argentine Chaco: camera-trap surveys suggest recent collapse and
                    selva paranaense: su relación con la disponibilidad de presas,                                 imminent regional extinction. Oryx, , –.
                    presión de caza y coexistencia con el puma (Puma concolor).                                R C O R E T E A M () R: a Language and Environment for Statistical
                    Mastozoología Neotropical, , –.                                                        Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna,
                P E R I A G O , M.E., C H I L LO , V. & O J E D A , R.A. () Loss of mammalian                  Austria.
                    species from the South American Gran Chaco: empty savanna                                  R A M A D O R I , D., D’ A N G E LO , R., A U E D , B. & G I AC C A R D I , M. ()
                    syndrome? Mammal review, , –.                                                            Plan Nacional de Conservación del Monumento Natural
                P E R OV I C , P.G. () Conservación del jaguar en Argentina. In                                Yaguareté (Panthera onca). Ministerio de Ambiente y Desarrollo
                    Jaguars in the New Milennium (eds R. Medellin, A. Rabinowitz,                                  Sustentable Administración de Parques Nacionales, Buenos Aires,
                    A. Taber, & K. Redford), pp. –. Universidad Autónoma de                                  Argentina.
                    México and Wildlife Conservation Society, Mexico City, Mexico.                             R I P P L E , W.J., E S T E S , J.A., B E S C H T A , R.L., W I L M E R S , C.C., R I T C H I E ,
                P E R OV I C , P.G., D E B U S T O S , S., R I V E R A , L., A R G U E D A S M O R A , S. &        E.G., H E B B L E W H I T E , M. et al. () Status and ecological effects
                    L I Z Á R R A G A , L. () Plan Estratégico Para la Conservación del                        of the world’s largest carnivores. Science, , .
                    Yaguareté (Panthera onca) en Las Yungas Argentinas.                                        S K I B I N S , J.C., P OW E L L , R.B. & H A L LO , J.C. () Charisma and
                    Administración de Parques Nacionales, Secretaría de Ambiente                                   conservation: charismatic megafauna’s influence on safari and zoo
                    de Salta, Secretaría de Gestión Ambiental de Jujuy y Escuela                                   tourists’ pro-conservation behaviors. Biodiversity and Conservation,
                    Latinoamericana de Áreas Protegidas, Salta, Argentina.                                         , –.
                P E R OV I C , P.G. & H E R R Á N , M. () Distribución del jaguar                          S L A G L E , K., Z A J AC , R., B R U S KO T T E R , J., W I L S O N , R. & P R A N G E , S.
                    (Panthera onca) en las provincias de Jujuy y Salta, noroeste de                                () Building tolerance for bears: a communications experiment.
                    Argentina. Mastozoología Neotropical, , –.                                                Journal of Wildlife Management, , –.
                P I E R C E , C.L., M A N F R E D O , M.J. & V A S K E , J.J. () Social science            S OT O -S H O E N D E R , J.R. & M A I N , M.B. () Differences in stakeholder
                    theories in wildlife management. In Human Dimensions of Wildlife                               perceptions of the jaguar Panthera onca and puma Puma concolor in
                    Management in North America (eds D.J. Daniel, T.L. Brown &                                     the tropical lowlands of Guatemala. Oryx, , –.
                    W.F. Siemer), pp. –. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, USA.                              T O R T AT O , F.R., I Z Z O , T.J., H O O G E S T E I J N , R. & P E R E S , C.A. () The
                P O R F I R I O , G., S A R M E N T O , P., L E A L , S. & F O N S E C A , C. () How is        numbers of the beast: valuation of jaguar (Panthera onca) tourism
                    the jaguar Panthera onca perceived by local communities along the                              and cattle depredation in the Brazilian Pantanal. Global Ecology and
                    Paraguay River in the Brazilian Pantanal? Oryx, , –.                                   Conservation, , –.
                Q U I G L E Y , H., F O S T E R , R., P E T R AC C A , L., P A Y A N , E., S A LO M , R. &     T R E V E S , A. & B R U S KO T T E R , J. () Tolerance for predatory wildlife.
                    H A R M S E N , B. () Panthera onca (errata version published in                           Science, , –.
                    ). In The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. dx.doi.org/.                          W I L L I A M S , C.K., E R I C S S O N , G. & H E B E R L E I N , T.A. ()
                    /IUCN.UK.-.RLTS.TA.en [accessed                                        A quantitative summary of attitudes toward wolves and their
                    October ].                                                                                 reintroduction (–). Wildlife Society Bulletin, , –.

                                                                                                    Oryx, 2020, 54(5), 678–686 © 2020 Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001552
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 46.4.80.155, on 06 Nov 2021 at 21:56:22, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001552
You can also read