Patients' Access to Telephone and E-mail Services Provided by IBD Nurses in Canada

 
CONTINUE READING
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, XX(XX), 1–8
                                                                           https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwab041
                                                                                                    Original Article

Original Article

Patients’ Access to Telephone and E-mail Services Provided by
IBD Nurses in Canada

                                                                                                                                             Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcag/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab041/6406971 by guest on 09 December 2021
Usha Chauhan, NP, MN, BScN, ACNP(D), CGN(C)1, , Larry Stitt, MSc2, Noelle Rohatinsky,
RN, MN, PhD, CMSN(C)3, Melanie Watson, RN (EC), MN, NP4, Barbara Currie, MN, RN-NP5,
Lisa Westin, MN, RN6, Wendy McCaw, RN7, Christine Norton, PhD MA RN8, Irina Nistor,
NP, PhD(C), MN9,
1
 Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 2Robarts Clinical Trials, London, Ontario, Canada; 3University
of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada; 4London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada; 5QEII
Health Sciences Centre, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada; 6Red Deer Regional Hospital, Red Deer, Alberta, Canada; 7Speciality
Rx, London, Ontario, Canada; 8King’s College London, London, UK; 9Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Correspondence: Usha Chauhan, NP, MN, BScN, ACNP(D), CGN(C), Nurse Practitioner- Adult Digestive Diseases, Hamilton
Health Sciences, 1280 Main St. W. Room 3N51, Hamilton, Ontario L8S 4K1, Canada, e-mail: chauhanu@hhsc.ca

ABSTRACT
Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) can impact the quality of life and increase health
care resource utilization. Nurses play an integral role in ensuring ease of access to care between sched-
uled office visits.
Aims: This study aimed to capture the utilization of Canadian IBD nursing telephone and e-mail
services.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study with an eight-item online survey was completed by
nurses to assess the use of nurse-led telephone and e-mail services for IBD patients.
Results: Twenty-one IBD nurses participated, and 572 patients nurse encounters were reported.
Patients with ulcerative (UC) contacted with disease flare when compared to Crohn’s disease (CD)
(40% versus 24%, P < 0.001). Nursing services were primarily utilized for queries regarding medi-
cation (39.3%), disease exacerbations (29.6%), investigations (26%), and scheduling appointments
(17.6%). Patients with CD had more telephone conversations (62.7%) and required more follow-up
telephone calls (72.2%) compared to patients with UC (33%) and 25%, respectively. Nurse-managed
interventions were provided independently for 61.4% of encounters, while 19% required a sched-
uled appointment in the IBD clinic. In the absence of telephone or e-mail assistance, older patients
were more likely to call their family doctor (r = 0.18, P < 0.001), visit the emergency room (r = 0.18,
P < 0.001), visit an urgent access clinic (r = 0.22, P < 0.001), or visit a walk-in clinic (r = 0.29,
P < 0.001) than younger patients.
Conclusions: Nurse-managed IBD advice lines are proactive services that can address most patient
disease-related concerns.
Keywords: E-mail; Inflammatory bowel disease IBD; Nursing; Patient support; Specialist nursing;
Telephone

Introduction
Canada is an ‘IBD epicentre’ (1) with one of the world’s highest         negative impact on patients’ quality of life and health care uti-
prevalence rates (2). The unpredictable disease course coupled           lization (2). Inflammatory bowel disease management involves
with intermittent flares and periods of remission has a substantial      regular patient–provider interactions and follow-ups, focusing
Received: March 28, 2021; Accepted: October 9, 2021.                                                                                    1
© Crown copyright 2021.
This Open Access article contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0
(https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3/).
2                                                       Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX

on disease activity and pharmaceutical treatment approaches            IBD care, while others are research nurses, case managers, and
(3,4). However, IBD patients’ care extends beyond regular              biologic support program coordinators (19). The majority of
clinic follow-up due to the disease’s unpredictable nature and         Canadian IBD nurses are advanced practice nurses or nurses
disease exacerbations, which do not coincide with scheduled            with extensive nursing experience. Their primary role includes
appointments (2). Consequently, efforts are being made to ex-          providing patient-related outpatient telephone advice, rapid
plore patient-centred ways to meet this population’s complex           access to care, and transition care. Despite the variations in
needs beyond the convenience and availability of health care           nursing roles, education levels, experience, and scope of prac-
providers and health services (5).                                     tice, IBD nurses widely provide telephone advice lines (19).

                                                                                                                                             Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcag/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab041/6406971 by guest on 09 December 2021
   Access to gastroenterology care varies throughout Canada               Telephone communication is an excellent tool in chronic dis-
(6). The management of Canadian patients living with IBD               ease management and is an invaluable resource for IBD patients.
occurs in acute care locations, ambulatory clinics, and family         Nurse-led telephone services provide IBD patients with a di-
practice settings (7). While clinical guidelines suggest that          rect link to clinical status reports, disease and treatment educa-
patients with active IBD symptoms should be seen by a spe-             tion, support, completion of health care forms, and insurance
cialist within 2 weeks (8), in practice, the wait time is typically    authorization (20). In addition, nurse advice lines represent a
much longer (27% 3 to 12 months, 6% over 12 months) (9).               safe and effective means of managing patients’ concerns while
Furthermore, in Canada, the number of gastroenterologists per          minimizing associated health care costs (21,22). However, such
thousand IBD patients varies geographically, ranging from 1.13         nurse-led initiatives have been understudied in the Canadian
to 10.65 (10). Consequently, the lack of access to specialized         population.
care places a significant strain on emergency departments’ re-
source utilization (6).                                                STUDY OBJECTIVES
   Nurse-led advice lines for IBD care are considered standard
                                                                       This study aimed to capture the utilization of Canadian IBD
practice in the United Kingdom (7). While there is a recognized
                                                                       nursing telephone and e-mail services for 14 days. Secondary
critical shortage of IBD nurses, 2.5 Full-Time Equivalent
                                                                       objectives were to (1) compare the reasons for the telephone
(FTE) clinical nurse specialists with competencies in IBD are
                                                                       and e-mail services encounters between patients with Crohn’s
recommended for a defined population of 250,000 (10,11).
                                                                       disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC); (2) evaluate the
Due to the increasing numbers of patients with IBD, the
                                                                       IBD nurse workload associated with a telephone and e-mail
increasing complexity of the IBD nurse role, and competing
                                                                       service; (3) determine the percentage of IBD patients requiring
demands on workload, the work setting can be particularly
                                                                       escalated care following their encounter with the IBD nurse
stressful for IBD nurses (12). Nevertheless, IBD patients ex-
                                                                       telephone and e-mail service (e.g., referral to the Emergency
press satisfaction with the care provided via advice lines and
                                                                       Department, booking an outpatient clinic appointment or tests,
recommend them for their ongoing care needs (13,14). Up to
                                                                       referral to allied health care providers or family doctors); and
100% of IBD nurses in the United Kingdom and 75% of IBD
                                                                       (4) determine patients’ views of their preferred health care utili-
nurses in Australia provide telephone access with up to 125 in-
                                                                       zation options based on age and in the absence of IBD nurse-led
coming and outgoing telephone calls per day in a high volume
                                                                       telephone and e-mail services.
IBD referral centre (15).
   The utilization of specialist nurses in IBD care has been as-
sociated with decreased outpatient assessments, emergency              STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
room visits, and hospitalizations, reduced hospital length of          This descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Canada
stay, improved mental health, and greater patient satisfaction         using the Canadian IBD (CANIBD) nurses’ group database.
with care (16–18). However, the role of IBD nursing is highly          A total of 84 IBD nurses invited who had previously consented
dependent on government or hospital funding. In addition,              to receive e-mails regarding CANIBD related initiatives were
IBD nurses are predominantly employed in academic centres,             invited by e-mail to participate. A unique identifier was assigned
where large patient volumes limit nurses’ abilities to compre-         to each nurse.
hensively address patients’ learning needs and concerns during           An eight-item online data collection tool was developed
appointments (9).                                                      (Supplementary Appendix 1) to capture the telephone and
   There are fewer than 90 IBD nurses across Canada (19), and          e-mail encounters in Google Docs in English and translated
more than 270,000 individuals have IBD (8). IBD nurses in              to French. Four nurses pretested this tool to ensure content
Canada have diverse roles and spend most of their time pro-            validity. To enhance study participation, IBD nurses were pro-
viding outpatient care, rapid access clinics, and advice line          vided with the option to complete data collection online or fax
services (14). Only 28.72% (79/275) of specialist GI nurses            the completed data collection form to the principal investigator.
practicing in gastroenterology have a primary role in providing        Each IBD nurse participant received the study information
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX                                                        3

and a copy of the data collection tool with instructions. The           ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
study framework was presented to a group of IBD nurses who
                                                                        Ethical approval was attained through the Hamilton Health
recommended that 2 weeks of data collection are feasible based
                                                                        Sciences Research Ethics Board (HiREB Project #: 2018-
on their clinical workload. Therefore, data were collected over
                                                                        2920). There was no financial incentive to participate in this
2 weeks between May 1, 2017 and June 30, 2017. The first con-
                                                                        study for either IBD nurses or patient participants. Implied con-
tact with the patient participants was defined as the initial en-
                                                                        sent was obtained from the nurses and verbal consent from the
counter. During the telephone encounter or via e-mail sent by
                                                                        patients during the telephone and e-mail encounters. The study
the IBD nurse, patients were asked about how likely they were
                                                                        was conducted following the Declaration of Helsinki.

                                                                                                                                            Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcag/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab041/6406971 by guest on 09 December 2021
to utilize alternative health care services in the absence of tele-
phone or e-mail service.
                                                                        RESULTS
                                                                        Utilization of Telephone and E-mail Services
STATISTICAL METHODS                                                     A total of 21 nurses from 16 centres across Canada participated.
Descriptive analyses were performed for the nursing role, pa-           Nurses worked with both adult and pediatric populations
tient gender, diagnosis, call length and purpose, and nursing           and had varying role designations, including research nurses,
action. For each alternative health care service option that            clinic nurses, Clinical Nurse Specialists (CNS), and Nurse
would have been used in the absence of the telephone or e-mail          Practitioners (NP) (Figure 1). Of 572 encounters reported,
service, the percentage of those likely or very likely to use the al-   there were 443 (77%) initial telephone encounters, 93
ternative was calculated by encounter type and plotted using bar        (16%) initial e-mail encounters, and 36 (6%) follow-up tele-
charts. Spearman rank correlations were used to examine the             phone encounters. The geographical location of the nursing
association between patient age categories and their likelihood         participants included Calgary and Edmonton (Alberta),
of using alternative health care services using the Likert scale.       Toronto, Hamilton, London, and Oshawa (Ontario), Sherbrook
Age was coded in increments of 5 years from 0 to >65 years old.         (Quebec) and Halifax (Nova Scotia). Most of the participating
Statistical analyses were conducted with SAS Version 9.4.               nurses were experienced, practicing in academic centers, while

Figure 1. Summary of nurse participants.
4                                                      Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX

a minority of nurses practiced in community centers, with less           In the absence of telephone or e-mail service, there were
than one year experience.                                             statistically significant associations between patient age and
  Reasons for the first encounter varied. Medication concerns         likelihood of choosing alternative health care. Older patients
were most frequent (n = 210, 39.3%), followed by disease              (>46 years) were more likely to call their family doctor (r = 0.18,
exacerbation (n = 158, 29.6%), investigation questions                P < 0.001), visit the emergency room (r = 0.18, P < 0.001), visit
(n = 139, 26.0%), scheduling appointments (n = 94, 17.6%),            an urgent access clinic (r = 0.22, P < 0.001), or visit a walk-in
and addressing other gastrointestinal symptoms (n = 86,               clinic (r = 0.29, P < 0.001) than younger patients (
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX                                                 5

Table 1. Summary of the telephone and e-mail encounters
                                               First encounter                                               Follow-up
                                                                                                             telephone calls after
                                               E-mail               Telephone           All
                                                                                                             e-mail (n = 36, 6%)
                                               (n = 93, 16%)        (n = 443, 77%)      (n = 536, 94%)
Nurse Type
  Adult                                        78 (83.9%)           327 (73.8%)         405 (75.6%)          26 (72.2%)
  Pediatric                                    15 (16.1%)           116 (26.2%)         131 (24.4%)          10 (27.8%)

                                                                                                                                     Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcag/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab041/6406971 by guest on 09 December 2021
Gender of patient participant
  Female                                       45 (52.9%)           244 (57.1%)         289 (56.5%)          21 (61.8%)
  Male                                         40 (47.1%)           183 (42.9%)         223 (43.6%)          13 (38.2%)
Age
  0–18                                         14 (15.4%)           122 (27.6%)         136 (25.5%)          11 (30.6%)
  19–45                                        54 (59.3%)           197 (44.6.%)        251 (47.1%)          16 (44.4%)
  46–55                                        20 (22.0%)            95 (21.5%)         115 (21.6%)           6 (16.7%)
  >65                                           3 (3.3%)             28 (6.3%)           31 (5.8%)            3 (8.3%)
Diagnosis
  Crohn’s disease                              49 (52.7%)           285 (64.8%)         334 (62.7%)          26 (72.2%)
  Ulcerative colitis                           36 (38.7%)           140 (31.8%)         176 (33.0%)           9 (25.0%)
  Undifferentiated IBD (IBDU)                   8 (8.6%)             15 (3.4%)           23 (4.3%)            1 (2.8%)
Length of Contact
  30 minutes                                   2 (3.4%)             15 (3.4%)           17 (3.4%)            2 (5.6%)
Reason for the encounter
  Disease Flare                                13 (14.1%)           145 (32.8%)         158 (29.6%)          17 (47.2%)
  Finances                                      0 (0.0%)              7 (1.6%)            7 (1.3%)            2 (5.6%)
  Insurance                                     5 (5.4%)             16 (3.6%)           21 (3.9%)            0 (0.0%)
  Investigations                               16 (17.4%)           123 (27.8%)         139 (26.0%)           7 (19.4%)
  Medication concerns                          40 (43.5%)           170 (38.5%)         210 (39.3%)          19 (52.8%)
  Other GI symptoms                            10 (10.9%)            76 (17.2%)          86 (16.1%)           9 (25.0%)
  Psycho-social concerns                        2 (2.2%)             26 (5.9%)           28 (5.2%)            4 (11.1%)
  Scheduling appointments                      27 (29.4%)            67 (15.2%)          94 (17.6%)          14 (38.9%)
  Non-GI symptoms                               3 (3.3%)             13 (2.9%)           16 (3.0%)            3 (8.3%)
  Other                                        10 (10.9%)            17 (3.9%)           27 (5.1%)            2 (5.6%)
Action
  Referral                                     18 (19.4%)            95 (21.6%)         113 (21.2%)          17 (48.6%)
  Contact patient support program               5 (5.4%)             37 (8.4%)           42 (7.9%)            4 (11.4%)
  ER/Hospital admission                         1 (1.1%)              8 (1.8%)            9 (1.7%)            3 (8.6%)
  Medication adjustment                         7 (7.5%)             38 (8.6%)           45 (8.4%)            3 (8.6%)
  Nurse managed intervention                   47 (50.5%)           280 (63.6%)         327 (61.4%)          24 (68.6%)
  Schedule appointment in IBD clinic           24 (25.8%)            77 (17.5%)         101 (19.0%)          11 (31.4%)
  Schedule call to reassess                     7 (7.5%)             50 (11.4%)          57 (10.7%)           7 (20.0%)
  Other                                         8 (8.6%)             32 (7.3%)           40 (7.5%)            2 (5.7%)

   Canada’s vast landscape can present challenges for patients       IBD-related complications (24). Advice lines provide an
living in rural areas as it can be challenging to access special-    opportunity to access expert IBD nursing care and, in turn,
ized, local health care due to limited access to IBD specialists     mitigate the disease burden for patients and the health care
(24). As a result, patients are more likely to utilize emer-         system, particularly for rural patients. Moreover, nurse-
gency rooms require hospital admissions, and experience              led IBD advice lines may decrease patients’ out-of-pocket
6                                                             Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX

Table 2. Reasons for the first encounters by diagnosis
                                                  CD                          UC                         Total                       P value
                                                  n (%)γ                      n (%)γ                     n (%)γ
Disease flare                                      80 (24.0)                  70 (40.0)                  150 (29.5)
Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX                                                               7

Table 3. Association between likely alternative health care utilization with age for the first encounter
                                                  Spearman’s r                    95% CI                               P value (testing r = 0)
Call gastroenterologist office                    −0.11                           (−0.20 to −0.02)                      0.019
Call family doctor                                 0.18                           (0.08–0.27)
8                                                                         Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology, 2021, Vol. XX, No. XX

research is warranted to explore the effects of IBD nurse-led                              3.    Castiglione F, Imperatore N, Testa A, et al. Efficacy of a “contact center-based com-
                                                                                                 munication” in optimizing the care of inflammatory bowel diseases. Dig Liver Dis
services for patient care across Canada, particularly in rural                                   2016;48(8):869–73.
areas, and their impacts on patient satisfaction, quality of life,                         4.    Regueiro M, Greer JB, Szigethy E. Etiology and treatment of pain and psycho-
                                                                                                 social issues in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases. Gastroenterology
IBD-related complications, and health care utilization.                                          2017;152(2):430–439.e4.
                                                                                           5.    Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SPL. Guidelines for the management of inflammatory
                                                                                                 bowel disease in adults. Gut 2004;53(Suppl V):1–16.
SUPPLEMENTARY DATA                                                                         6.    Nguyen GC, Bouchard S, Diong C; Promoting Access and Care through Centres
                                                                                                 of Excellence (PACE) Network. Access to specialists and emergency department
Supplementary data are available at Journal of the Canadian                                      visits in inflammatory bowel disease: A population-based study. J Crohns Colitis

                                                                                                                                                                                             Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/jcag/advance-article/doi/10.1093/jcag/gwab041/6406971 by guest on 09 December 2021
                                                                                                 2019;13(3):330–6.
Association of Gastroenterology online.
                                                                                           7.    Lamb CA, Kennedy NA, Raine T, et al.; IBD guidelines eDelphi consensus group.
                                                                                                 British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of in-
                                                                                                 flammatory bowel disease in adults. Gut 2019;68(Suppl 3):s1–s106.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT                                                                             8.    Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. Impact of inflammatory bowel disease. 2018; Available
                                                                                                 from: http://crohnsandcolitis.ca/Crohns_and_Colitis/documents/reports/2018-
The authors would like to thank CANIBD nurses for their participa-                               Impact-Report-LR.pdf (accessed August 2, 2020).
tion in this study.                                                                        9.    Bray J, Fernandes A, Nguyen GC, et al. The challenges of living with inflammatory
                                                                                                 bowel disease: Summary of a summit on patient and healthcare provider perspectives.
                                                                                                 Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;2016:9430942.
                                                                                           10.   Leary A, Mason I, Punshon G. Modelling the inflammatory bowel disease specialist
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS                                                                             nurse workforce standards by determination of optimum caseloads in the UK. J
                                                                                                 Crohns Colitis 2018;12(11):1295–301.
U.C.: Substantial contributions to the conception and design of the
                                                                                           11.   El-Matary W, Benchimol EI, Mack D, et al. Allied health professional support in pedi-
study; acquisition and analysis of study data; drafting the work; de-                            atric inflammatory bowel disease: A survey from the Canadian Children Inflammatory
velopment and final approval of the manuscript; agreement to be ac-                              Bowel Disease Network-A Joint Partnership of CIHR and the CH.I.L.D. Foundation.
                                                                                                 Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017;2017:3676474.
countable for all aspects of the work. L.S.: Substantial contributions
                                                                                           12.   Correal EN, Leiva OB, Galguera AD, et al. Nurse-led telephone advice line for patients
to acquisition of study design, development of the database, statistical                         with inflammatory bowel disease: A cross-sectional multicenter activity analysis.
analysis, and review of the manuscript. N.R.: Substantial contribu-                              Gastroenterol Nurs 2019;42(2):133–9.
                                                                                           13.   Bager P, Chauhan U, Greveson K, et al. Systematic review: Advice lines for patients
tion to the development and final approval of the manuscript. M.W.:
                                                                                                 with inflammatory bowel disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 2018;53(5):506–12.
Substantial contributions to the acquisition of study design and con-                      14.   Bernstein M, Chhibba T, Walker J, et al. Preferences for care for active symptoms of
tribution of writing the manuscript. B.C.: Substantial contributions                             IBD in a population based sample. Gastroenterology 2017;152(5):S365.
                                                                                           15.   Reid LW, Chivers S, Plummer V, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease manage-
to the acquisition of study design and review of the final manuscript.
                                                                                                 ment: A review of nurses’ roles in Australia and the United Kingdom. Aust J
W.M.: Substantial contributions to acquisition and analysis of study                             Adv Nurs 2009;27(2):19–26.et al. Inflammatory bowel disease management:
data; drafting the work; final approval of the manuscript; agree-                                A review of nurses’ roles in Australia and the United Kingdom. Aust J Adv Nurs
                                                                                                 2009;27(2):19–26.
ment to be accountable for all aspects of the work. C.N.: Substantial
                                                                                           16.   Leach P, De Silva M, Mountifield R, et al. The effect of an inflammatory bowel disease
contributions to the conception and design of the study; analysis of                             nurse position on service delivery. J Crohns Colitis 2014;8(5):370–4.
data; final approval of the manuscript; agreement to be accountable                        17.   Nightingale AJ, Middleton W, Middleton SJ, et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of
                                                                                                 a specialist nurse in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Eur J
for all aspects of the work. I.N.: Substantial contributions to the con-
                                                                                                 Gastroenterol Hepatol 2000;12(9):967–73.
ception and study design, acquisition and analysis of data, drafting the                   18.   Belling R, McLaren S, Woods L. Specialist nursing interventions for inflammatory
work, development and final approval of the manuscript, agreement to                             bowel disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;4:CD006597
                                                                                           19.   Stretton JG, Currie BK, Chauhan UK. Inflammatory bowel disease nurses in Canada:
be accountable for all aspects of the work.
                                                                                                 An examination of Canadian gastroenterology nurses and their role in inflammatory
                                                                                                 bowel disease care. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2014;28(2):89–93.
                                                                                           20.   Ramos-Rivers C, Regueiro M, Vargas EJ, et al. Association between telephone activity
Funding                                                                                          and features of patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol
                                                                                                 2014;12(6):986–94.e1.
The study did not receive any funding.                                                     21.   Kemp K, Dibley L, Chauhan U, et al. Second N-ECCO consensus statements on the
                                                                                                 European nursing roles in caring for patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.
                                                                                                 J Crohns Colitis 2018;12(7):760–76.
                                                                                           22.   O’Connor M, Bager P, Duncan J, et al. N-ECCO Consensus statements on the
CONFLICT OF INTEREST                                                                             European nursing roles in caring for patients with Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis.
U.C.: Advisory Board- AbbVie, Janssen, Takada, Pfizer, Ferring. B.C.:                            J Crohns Colitis 2013;7(9):744–64.
                                                                                           23.   Harris RJ, Downey L, McDonnell M, et al. Evolution of an inflammatory bowel dis-
Advisory Board/Consultant- AbbVie, Janssen, Takeda, Pfizer, Ferring.                             ease helpline and implications for service design and development. Gastrointest Nurs
The other authors declared no conflicts of interest.                                             2020;18(2):46–50.
                                                                                           24.   Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, Bitton A, et al. The impact of inflammatory bowel
                                                                                                 disease in Canada 2018: A scientific report from the Canadian Gastro-Intestinal
                                                                                                 Epidemiology Consortium to Crohn’s and Colitis Canada. J Can Assoc Gastroenterol
References                                                                                       2019;2(Suppl 1):1–5.
1.   Rocchi A, Benchimol EI, Bernstein CN, et al. Inflammatory bowel disease: A Canadian   25.   Squires SI, Boal AJ, Lamont S, et al. Implementing a self-management strategy in in-
     burden of illness review. Can J Gastroenterol 2012;26(11):811–7.                            flammatory bowel disease (IBD): Patient perceptions, clinical outcomes and the im-
2.   Cross RK, Jambaulikar G, Langenberg P, et al. TELEmedicine for Patients with                pact on service. Frontline Gastroenterol 2017;8(4):272–8.
     Inflammatory Bowel Disease (TELE-IBD): Design and implementation of                   26.   Younge L, Mason I, Kapasi R. Specialist inflammatory bowel disease nursing in the UK:
     randomized clinical trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2015;42:132–44.                              Current situation and future proofing. Frontline Gastroenterol 2021;12(3):169–74.
You can also read