REPRESENTING THE UNDOCUMENTED WORKER IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE - Part 1. If Donald Trump becomes president
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
8/31/2015 REPRESENTING THE UNDOCUMENTED WORKER IN A PERSONAL INJURY CASE Charles J. Schleifer, Esq. Haggerty, Goldberg, Schleifer & Kupersmith Part 1. If Donald Trump becomes president: 1
8/31/2015 Part 2. PRESENT STRATEGIES Incidence of Undocumented Worker Injury and factual scenario that often occurs Statistics: a. There are between 6.4 million and 8 million undocumented workers in the U.S. labor Force (The Migration Policy Institute) b. Type of Work. Often the most dangerous jobs 1. Construction: 920,000 2. Agriculture: 540,000 3. Manufacturing: 520,000 • c. 6 % of U.S. civilian work force and 10% of work injuries • Why higher rate of injuries than general work force? • 1. Poor training • 2. Unsafe conditions • 3. Communication/Language barrier • 4. Cultural barriers • 5. Employers often view undocumented workers as expendable and bypass Occupational Safety & Health Administration (OSHA) regulations 2
8/31/2015 d. Myth about whether undocumented workers pay taxes: 1. Social Security Administration estimated that in 2010, undocumented workers and their employers paid $13 billion in payroll taxes. DDA paid back only $1 billion in benefits. 2. Institute for Taxation and Economic Policy, undocumented workers paid $10.6 billion in state and local taxes in 2010, including $1.2 billion in personal income taxes, $1.2 billion in property taxes and more than $8 billion in sales and excise taxes 3. Harvard University study, undocumented workers’ payroll contributions to Medicare more than $3 billion each year. e. Reality that employers are often aware of is that most undocumented workers live in fear to be identified and deported. As a result, they often do not report crime to police, do not speak up when abused by employers and do not avail themselves of the courts. 3
8/31/2015 • WHO ARE THESE PEOPLE AND WHY ARE THEY HERE? • 1. Mostly from Mexico but also from countries of South America and islands in the Caribbean. • They come here, not to free load, but for a better life. They generally work hard with little training at jobs others don’t want, are dependable, pay taxes, go home and take care of their families. Considerations in Representing them in a personal injury case involving employment 1. Do you want to represent undocumented workers?—can you communicate with them? 4
8/31/2015 2. Common scenario in case of undocumented worker injury a. Status of the worker as employee, sub‐contractor or someone else’s employee. Difficulty in getting accurate facts surrounding employment b. Coverage issues involving workers compensation insurance and/or liability insurance with employee/sub‐contractor employee exclusions c. How it works in reality (Salazar example) 3. Where status of worker in question, Proceeding with a claim in workers compensation: Discussion of Advantages vs. Disadvantages. 5
8/31/2015 Advantages a. Where factors of employment would establish an employment relationship with general contractor/owner: (control, payment, hours, etc) 1.If employer has workers compensation coverage: a. Filing for compensation precludes tort action (exclusive remedy Provisions of the Act) b. If shown that an injury to employee occurred, regardless of previous physical condition, arising the course of his employment and related thereto: 1. All reasonable and necessary medical bills 2. Specific loss benefits (eye, arm, etc.) 3. Death benefits 4. Earnings lost benefit for either partial or total disability. 6
8/31/2015 b. Where factors of employment would establish that injured party was actually an employee of a sub‐contractor, performing work for general contractor 1. If sub‐contractor maintains workers compensation coverage, which he usually is contract and statute‐bound to maintain, same benefits as above. 2. If sub‐contractor fails to maintain workers compensation coverage, general contractor, as statutory employer, would be responsible for all benefits described above so long as elements of statutory employer are met, including injury on the premises of the general and sub‐ contract relationship with employer of the injured worker. c. Where neither general contractor nor sub‐contractor maintains workers compensation coverage, benefits available under the Uninsured Employer Guaranty Fund, which would give the fund the right to seek subrogation from the uninsured entities. 7
8/31/2015 d. In all above scenarios, the greatest benefit is that the employee will not have to demonstrate negligence on the part of others and employees own comparative negligence would not be a bar to recovery, nor limit recovery. • Disadvantages • 1. No recovery for pain and suffering • 2. Excluded from filing tort action • 3. Wage loss recovery is on 2/3 of actual loss subject to statutory limit and employer would have a right to reduce compensation by returning injured worker to a modified job or, as soon as injured worker is released to return to work in any capacity, the employer would be entitled to potential suspension of lost wage benefits as the employer, unlike cases involving documented workers, is not required to show job availability when the employee is an undocumented worker. Reinforced Earth Company v. WCAB (Astudillo), 810 A. 2nd 99 (Pa. 2002) 8
8/31/2015 • WHERE EMPLOYER DENIES THAT WORKER IS AN EMPLOYEE OR WHERE EMPLOYER DOES NOT HAVE WORKERS COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR INJURED WORKER, ABSOLUTE RIGHT TO PROCEED IN TORT VS. THIS ENTITY. Liberty v. Adventure Shops, 641 A.2nd 615 (1994) • Issues involved in suing an employer in tort on behalf of an undocumented worker • 1. Injured undocumented individual allowed access to the court for personal injury claims Hagl v. Jacob Stern & Sons, Inc., 396 F. Supp. 779 (E.D. Pa. 1975) • 2. Will the undocumented workers status be known to the trier of fact? (Jury) • a. Where claim is only for pain and suffering and past loss of earnings to present, you should be able to file motion in limine to preclude this as unfairly prejudicial and not relevant, but watch out for jury figuring it out anyway and subtleties of questions (such as filing taxes under different tax ID #s that are phony) 9
8/31/2015 • 3. Can Undocumented worker pursue a claim for past and future wage loss? • a. Yes. Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. NLRB 535 U.S. 137, 122 S.Ct. 1275, 152 L.Ed. 271 (2002). (fired employee not entitled to back‐ pay In NLRB action) However, in The Reinforced Earth Company v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board, 570 Pa. 464, 810 A. 2d 99 (2002) the Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an undocumented worker (Illegal alien) was entitled to pursue disability benefits under the workers compensation act. Subsequently, in Berdejo V. Exclusive Builders, Inc., 865 F. Supp. 2nd 617, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93510 (2011), the Federal Court predicted that , since Reinforced Earth, the high court of Pennsylvania would also permit an illegal alien (undocumented worker) to recover economic losses in a personal injury law suit. • b. Realities of claiming future wage loss • 1. Speculative nature of future loss based on illegal earning to begin with • 2. Vocational expert: must he consider what loss would be, such as Mexican earning scale, should injured worker be returned to his native land, the only place where he can legally seek employment • 3. Illegal status of worker would then likely be fair game and fair subject of credibility in calculating future loss. 10
8/31/2015 • BIG QUESTION: IS IT WORTH THE RISK? • Coverage issues under employers liability policy where suit is in tort: • 1. Effect of preclusions. (most policies exclude injuries to employees (question of fact) or for injuries to employees of individuals under control of sub‐contractor • 2. Subsequent litigation on coverage. • CONCLUSIONS: • 1. Most Undocumented workers, thought illegally here, are people who simply wanted a better life and came here to work hard, dependably with hopes of providing a better life for their families. They work, pay taxes, go home and most stay out of trouble. • 2. Under Trump plan, issues are moot.. (Those who remain will be too frightened to file a claim • 3. Workers Comp claim would be safest way to go if injuries will not prevent worker from future employment. If permanent injuries, look for other alternatives, as reality suggests that injured worker will be off comp. as soon as he is deemed able to do any suitable employment, whether or not there are jobs available. • 4. Tort action can be viable and only opportunity for fair compensation but the slope is very slippery and decisions on how to proceed must be made with total disclosure of risks to your client and extreme caution. 11
You can also read