Ohio DOT's Ohio/Indiana UAS Center - Enabling UAS Operations - Fred Judson, GISP UAS Program Director - Aviation Council
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
UAS Initiative Ohio DOT’s Ohio/Indiana UAS Center – Enabling UAS Operations Fred Judson, GISP UAS Program Director Fred.Judson@dot.state.oh.us For Documents http://bit.ly/1QJCZcs
UAS Initiative OH/IN UAS Center & Test Complex Mission • Promote UAS in Ohio and Indiana Enabling Flight • 18 Active COAs • 23 Approved COAs • 20 In Various Review Stages • 10 Aerostat Waivers • Section 333 Activities • DOT Training Mapping/Structure • Vibrant Response • Assisted Penn State Police • Guardian Shield • Performed over 150 flights last year • Participating in FAA COE with OSU • FAA/AFRL Ground Based Sense and Avoid
UAS Initiative OH/IN UAS Center & Test Complex - Services • Operations Experience • Business Requirement Study • Operations Analysis • Airspace Analysis • Crew Qualifications • COA/333 Preparation/Submission • UAS Research • Independent Safety Review Board • Flight Readiness Review • Flight Operations • FAA Reporting • Data Processing
UAS Initiative Structure Investigation What We Want • Remove Some Risk • Perform Our Tasks Efficiently • Provide Added Value Current Issues • Regulations – Non-participants – 91.119 – BLOVS • Platform Limitations – Sensors • Avoidance and GPS • Power and Quality – Weather • Human Piloting What We Can Get • High Resolution Imagery Typically Difficult to Acquire • 3D Modeling • Thermal Loading – Concrete Delamination
UAS Initiative UAS for Mapping “One of drones’ many boons is to democratize the process of mapmaking. They are far cheaper than the mapmaking technologies they replace.” – Enables end users – Disrupts Traditional Services Name Platform Software Sensor AGL Accuracy Findings Date Baseline Surveys Ltd. C-Astral Bramor Agisoft Photoscan Sony Nex-7 300' Accuracy 95% , 1.6" horizontal, 2.7" vertical Sept. 2013 Olympus PEN E- 100'- Institute for Sustainable Agriculture MD-4 1000 Agisoft Photoscan PM1 200' Mean accuracy between 77%-90% Horizontal Mar-14 PIX4D and Helimap Systems Swinglet Cam Socet GXP and Pix4D Canon Ixus 120IS 500' 0.4"-0.59" Horizontal, 0.39" vertical and RMSE 0.04 to 0.07 Sep-11 Canon Digital TU Berlin HiSystems MK Okto Bundler, PMVS2, Photoscan Ixus 100 IS 165' Absolute point cloud deviation= 0.78" 2011 Canon 550D digital 100- Univ. Tasmania TerraLuma UAV Opensource and Custom/MVS (Multiview stereopsis) SLR camera 165' ±0.67" (but never more than 1.02" horizontal, 1.57" vertical) May-12
UAS Initiative Mapping/Flight Operations Tips • Slow Shutter Speed ICE: Image Composite (HexagonGeospatial) ERDAS IMAGINE Pro APS 3D Mapping Suite (Hexagon Geospatial) Postflight Terra 3D Pix4D Mapper Pro Agisoft Photoscan Editor (Microsoft) Inpho UASMaster (Sensefly +Pix4D) Ability/ Feature • Unstable Platform (Sensefly+Menci) 2D3 (Catalina) Correlator 3D EnsoMOSAIC GeoApp.UAS GeoApp.UAS DroneMaper • (Trimble) Camera Resolution Pro • Things in Motion Orthomosaic X X X X X X X X X X X – Trees (Wind), Water etc. Point Cloud X X X X X X X X X X Generation • Little or no Texture Mesh Modeling X X X X – Sand, Snow Texture Generation X X X X X • Repeating Texture Terrestrial Data X X X X X X X X X X X X Aerial Data X X X X X X X X X X X X – Forest, Farm Fields DD D D D D D D C C C C Desktop/Cloud • Lighting Changes – Clouds or Time of Day • Not Enough Overlap • Different Software Processing Packages • Aerial Imagery – Low altitude causes greater perspective change causing more post processing to “make it look right” for things that protrude from the ground.
UAS Initiative Questions Fred Judson, GISP Updates: UAS Program Director • 11250 Airframes Fred.Judson@dot.state. Approved for New 333’s oh.us • 9 Day Approval Times for 333’s • On-line Registrations for Commercial UAS • Blanket COA Raised to 400 • On Target for New Regulations 06/17/16
You can also read