Lista de publicaciones del Think Tank del PE
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
Lista de publicaciones del Think Tank del PE
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank
Criterios de búsqueda a partir de los cuales se ha generado la lista :
Ordenar Ordenar por fecha
Palabra clave "ciudadano de la UE"
44 Resultado(s) encontrado(s)
Fecha de creación : 30-12-2021Rapid steps towards a digital green certificate
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 22-04-2021
Autor Niestadt Maria
Ámbito político Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia | Salud pública | Transporte | Turismo
Palabra clave certificado sanitario | ciudadano de la UE | control fronterizo | control sanitario | enfermedad por coronavirus | epidemia
| frontera interior de la UE | libre circulación de personas | propuesta (UE) | vacunación
Resumen In March 2021, the European Commission put forward a legislative proposal on a 'digital green certificate' that aims to
facilitate free movement within the EU. The certificate would be available for Union citizens and their family members
to indicate that they have either received a Covid-19 vaccine, had a recent negative test result, or have recovered from
Covid-19. The proposal is complemented by another legislative proposal, which ensures that same rules apply to third-
country nationals in the EU. With a view to the introduction of the certificate by summer 2021, the European Parliament
decided to discuss the proposal under the urgent procedure. The Council has already agreed a mandate for
negotiations. Parliament is expected to adopt its position during its April 2021 session so that interinstitutional
negotiations can start as soon as possible thereafter in order to have the framework in place by summer 2021.
De un vistazo EN
Citizens, Equality, Rights and Values programme
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 21-04-2021
Autor SHREEVES Rosamund
Ámbito político Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | democracia participativa | derecho del individuo | derechos humanos | fondo (UE) | igualdad de
trato | marco financiero plurianual | programa de la UE | propuesta (UE) | sociedad civil (movimientos de opinión)
Resumen Given the extent of inequality and discrimination, challenges to fundamental rights and citizens' lack of awareness of
the rights they enjoy, the EU institutions have recognised the importance of funding to protect core EU values and
fundamental rights, support civil society organisations and sustain open, democratic and inclusive societies. In May
2018, the European Commission adopted a proposal for a regulation establishing a new Rights and Values
programme as part of the new 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF). An early second-reading
agreement was reached with the Council in trilogue negotiations, which is now expected to be voted by Parliament
during the April 2021 session.
De un vistazo EN
Digital green certificate
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 26-03-2021
Autor Niestadt Maria
Ámbito político Coronavirus | Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia | Salud pública | Transporte
Palabra clave certificado sanitario | ciudadano de la UE | control fronterizo | control sanitario | enfermedad por coronavirus | epidemia
| frontera interior de la UE | libre circulación de personas | propuesta (UE) | vacunación
Resumen On 17 March 2021, the European Commission put forward a proposal for a regulation on a 'digital green certificate'
allowing for safe and free movement of EU citizens during the pandemic, and an accompanying proposal covering
third-country nationals legally staying or residing in the EU. The certificate would provide proof that the person has
been vaccinated, give results of Covid-19 tests and/or information on the acquisition of antibodies. The aim is to help
restore free movement of people in the EU. On 25 March 2021, the European Parliament decided to accelerate work
on the Commission proposals, using the urgent procedure.
De un vistazo EN
Schengen Borders Code
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 26-03-2021
Autor AHAMAD MADATALI HANNAH NAFIZE
Ámbito político Evaluación de la legislación y las políticas en la práctica
Palabra clave Acuerdo de Schengen | ciudadano de la UE | control fronterizo | cooperación transfronteriza | enfermedad por
coronavirus | epidemia | extranjero | frontera exterior de la UE | frontera interior de la UE | reglamento (UE)
Resumen Presently, the Schengen Area is confronted with a different reality than in 2016, when the European Parliament and
Council approved Regulation (EU) 2016/399 (as codification of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 and its subsequent
amendments), establishing a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen
Borders Code). As stated in the Commission Work Programme of 2021, the current health crisis and pandemic, and
recent developments - related to security concerns and the arrival of refugees -, have exposed the EU’s need to
strengthen its crisis preparedness and management of cross-border pressures, as well as keeping the Schengen
legislation updated, making it suitable to endure the test of time.
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 1The role of Points of Single Contact (PSCs) and other information services in the Single Market (At A
Glance - Study In Focus)
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 09-11-2020
Autor externo Pau SALSAS-FORN et al.
Ámbito político Mercado interior y unión aduanera | Protección de los consumidores
Palabra clave acceso a la información de la UE | acción de la UE | campaña de sensibilización | ciudadano de la UE | cooperación
administrativa | difusión de la información de la UE | formalidad administrativa | informe de investigación | libre
prestación de servicios | mercado único | procedimiento administrativo | reglamento (UE)
Resumen This At A Glance summarises the key findings of the original study, which analysed the role and development of Points
of Single Contact and other information services. The study reviewed recent policy documents, and identified a range
of weaknesses for the provision of contact points. The main recommendations were to improve monitoring (using the
indicators and the Single Market Scoreboard) and make use of infringement proceedings in case of non-compliance.
The actions could be built on the instruments available under the recent Single Digital Gateway Regulation.
This document was provided by the Policy Department for Economic, Scientific and Quality of Life Policies at the
request of the committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection (IMCO).
De un vistazo EN
EU and UK citizens' rights after Brexit: An overview
Tipo de publicación Análisis en profundidad
Fecha 18-06-2020
Autor CIRLIG Carmen-Cristina
Ámbito político Asuntos exteriores | Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave acuerdo (UE) | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | derecho del individuo | elecciones europeas | extranjero |
libre circulación de personas | periodo transitorio (UE) | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE
Resumen This EPRS paper analyses the implications of Brexit for the rights of both European Union and United Kingdom
citizens and provides an overview of the rights protected by the Withdrawal Agreement, which entered into force on 1
February 2020, as well as of the national measures envisaged by the UK and the EU Member States to give effect to
the relevant provisions thereof. As a result of the UK leaving the EU and becoming a third country, UK citizens are no
longer EU citizens and they will therefore lose a series of rights based on EU citizenship once the transition period
provided for in the agreement expires. Currently, UK and EU citizens may still move to the EU and the UK respectively,
under the applicable EU rules. Beyond the end of the transition period, the agreement guarantees the rights of EU and
UK citizens who had made use of their freedom of movement rights by the end of 2020.
Análisis en profundidad DE, EN, FR
Repatriation of EU citizens during the COVID-19 crisis: The role of the EU Civil Protection Mechanism
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 01-04-2020
Autor PRPIC Martina
Ámbito político Coronavirus | Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | enfermedad por coronavirus | epidemia | Estado miembro UE | migración de retorno | protección
civil
Resumen According to official estimates, the COVID-19 crisis has left more than 200 000 EU citizens stranded outside the
borders of the EU. EU Member States have been making great efforts to retrieve them, often with the help of the EU.
The priority has been to return EU citizens by using commercial flights, but as the conditions continue to worsen, other
resources have had to be utilised. EU Member States can activate the EU Civil Protection Mechanism to facilitate the
repatriation of their and other EU citizens, if the Emergency Crisis Response Centre assesses that there is no better
way. So far, at least 15 countries are reported to have requested the help of the Civil Protection Mechanism, using it to
organise flights co-funded with EU funds, and so far repatriating 4 382 EU citizens (and 550 others), first from China,
and then from a wide range of countries, including Cape Verde, the Dominican Republic, Egypt, Georgia, Japan,
Morocco, the Philippines, Tunisia, the USA and Vietnam. More flights are scheduled to bring people back from other
locations. The EU Civil Protection Mechanism has been used more than 300 times to respond to disasters since its
establishment in 2001. All the EU Member States, together with Iceland, Montenegro, Norway, North Macedonia,
Serbia and Turkey, participate in the Mechanism, but it can also be activated by any country in the world and by certain
international organisations. Once the Mechanism is activated, a number of steps follow. The Emergency Crisis
Response Centre, as part of the Mechanism, decides on the best response and coordinates it. The EU funds up to 75
% of the costs of the deployment of resources. The 2019 upgrade of the Mechanism boosted the joint capacity for
responding to disasters, including medical emergencies. It created rescEU, a reserve of capacities, which has now
been augmented to include a stockpile of medical equipment for the COVID-19 response, 90 % of which is funded by
the EU. On 27 March 2020, the Commission proposed to further boost the budget for repatriation and for the rescEU
stockpile.
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 2EU policies – Delivering for citizens: Youth empowerment
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 28-06-2019
Autor CHIRCOP Denise
Ámbito político Cultura
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | difusión de la información de la UE | estrategia de la UE | identidad
europea | joven | paro juvenil | política de la juventud | resumen | sondeo de opinión | trabajo de jóvenes
Resumen The proportion of young people (15-29 years old) in the general EU population is declining. On the whole, young
people have a higher level of education than older adults, and youth unemployment rates have begun to decrease.
Nevertheless, young people are still more exposed to poverty and social exclusion than other sections of the
population. They are less prone to put their health at risk than previous generations. For instance, fewer young people
smoke, get drunk, or become involved in a road accident than previously, but young people are still over-represented
among those who are injured in road accidents. Obesity due to bad eating habits and lack of physical exercise is still
an issue. Young people are also less likely to vote, or stand for election than older adults, but in recent years there has
been a slight increase in interest in politics, political action and volunteering. Almost 80 % of young Europeans identify
themselves as European citizens. In a Eurobarometer survey published in 2018 they placed education, skills and the
environment at the top of a list of priorities for the EU. The European Union is engaged in helping Member States
address young people's needs and aspirations through a youth strategy which covers areas such as employment,
entrepreneurship, social inclusion, participation, education, training, health, wellbeing, voluntary activities, the global
dimension, creativity and culture. The strategy is backed by a number of funding programmes that are specifically
focused on young people, most notably the Youth Employment Initiative, Erasmus+ and the European Solidarity
Corps. It also draws from funds directed at other specific policy areas. EU action in the area of youth empowerment is
best known for the mobility opportunities it has created, in particular through Erasmus. Future challenges include
reaching a wider spectrum of young people, especially those from disadvantaged and hard-to-reach groups, making
the results of the consultative process, known as youth dialogue, more tangible, and improving synergies between
policy areas for greater effectiveness. This is an update of an earlier briefing issued in advance of the 2019 European
elections.
Briefing DE, EN, FR
Multimedia Youth empowerment
Is transparency the key to citizens’ trust?
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 11-04-2019
Autor BAUER Elisabeth | THIEL Marie
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave campaña electoral | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | cooperación interinstitucional (UE) | democracia
participativa | democracia representativa | elecciones europeas | Estado de Derecho | grupo de interés | sondeo de
opinión | transparencia del proceso decisorio
Resumen Trust in political institutions is a key element of representative democracies. Trust in the rule of law is also the basis for
democratic participation of citizens. According to the spring 2018 Eurobarometer survey of public awareness of the EU
institutions, 50 % of respondents indicated they trust the European Parliament, which represents a 34 % increase
since the beginning of the 2014-2019 legislative term. A transparent political decision-making processes has become a
common objective to help strengthen citizens’ trust in policy-makers and enhance the accountability of public
administrations. In this regard, regulation of lobbying (the exchange between policy makers and stakeholders), and
bolstering the integrity of this process, is often considered a vital ingredient. Public expectations for increased
transparency of the exchange between policy-makers and interest representatives varies from one political system to
the next, but it has increasingly become a topic of debate for parliaments across Europe, and a regular demand during
election campaigns.
De un vistazo EN
Mejora de la seguridad de los documentos de identidad de los ciudadanos de la Unión
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 02-04-2019
Autor SGUEO Gianluca
Ámbito político Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | control fronterizo | crimen organizado | documento de identidad | extranjero | falsedad
documental | frontera exterior de la UE | lucha contra el crimen | propuesta (UE) | terrorismo
Resumen Está previsto que el Parlamento Europeo vote en abril una propuesta legislativa destinada a mejorar la seguridad de
los documentos de identidad de los ciudadanos de la Unión, así como de los documentos de residencia expedidos a
ciudadanos de la Unión y a sus familiares. La propuesta pretende poner coto al uso de documentos fraudulentos, que
terroristas y delincuentes pueden utilizar para entrar en la Unión desde un tercer país.
De un vistazo ES, DE, EN, FR, IT, PL
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 3Technology and social polarisation
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 07-03-2019
Autor BOUCHER Philip Nicholas
Ámbito político Democracia | Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario | Planificación prospectiva | Politica social |
Política de investigación | Protección de los consumidores
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | comunicación de masas | democracia | desinformación | impacto de la
tecnología de la información | medios sociales | pluralismo de los medios de comunicación | populismo | profesión de
la comunicación | propaganda electoral | propaganda política
Resumen With the Cambridge Analytica scandal, it became clear how technologies such as social media and techniques such as
psychological profiling can be combined in election campaigns with worrying effects. Personalised political messaging
is highly automated. It starts and ends with social media, which provides both the data for categorising users and the
medium for targeting them with personalised messages. Messages might be designed to favour a particular candidate
or to encourage widespread discord and mistrust. In either case, it could lead to more polarised societies in which
citizens share less common ground and are less understanding of those with different political ideologies, attitudes to
populism, or perspectives on specific topics such as immigration. These same technologies and techniques also shape
trends in news production and consumption. As newspaper sales dwindle, outlets increasingly rely upon ad-revenue
generated by clicks, making extensive use of social media platforms and user profiling. Public debate increasingly
occurs via these social media platforms in which citizens, politicians, companies and bots communicate directly to
each other without the traditional filters of journalistic standards and editorial oversight. It has been suggested that,
where citizens increasingly rely on such platforms for news, they risk entering so-called ‘filter bubbles’ in which they
are exposed to a narrow range of perspectives oriented around their own profiles, shielded from contrasting views, in a
broad trend that could also lead to more polarised societies. In this context, STOA launched two studies to explore the
mechanisms by which these technologies and techniques may foster polarisation in Europe. One study approached
the question with reference to trends in the production and consumption of news media, while the other focussed on
trends in political campaigning and communication strategies.
Briefing EN
Revisión de la Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 06-03-2019
Autor TILINDYTE-HUMBURG Laura
Ámbito político Adopción de legislación por el PE y el Consejo | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | cooperación interinstitucional (UE) | democracia participativa | Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea |
petición | poder de iniciativa | propuesta (UE)
Resumen La Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea (ICE) existe desde hace casi siete años y ahora las normas que rigen su
funcionamiento son objeto de revisión. Tras las negociaciones interinstitucionales, el Parlamento y el Consejo
alcanzaron un acuerdo provisional sobre la propuesta de la Comisión de revisión de la ICE. Ese acuerdo requiere
ahora la aprobación formal de los colegisladores, y se prevé que el Parlamento Europeo someta a votación la
propuesta en su período parcial de sesiones de marzo I.
De un vistazo ES, DE, EN, FR, IT, PL
Citizenship by investment (CBI) and residency by investment (RBI) schemes in the EU
Tipo de publicación Estudio
Fecha 17-10-2018
Autor SCHERRER Amandine Marie Anne | THIRION Elodie
Ámbito político Asuntos económicos y monetarios | Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | competencias de los Estados miembros | derecho de residencia | Estado
miembro UE | extranjero | familia | inversión directa | inversión extranjera | libertad de circulación | política de visados
de la UE | seguridad europea
Resumen This study analyses the state of play and issues surrounding citizenship and residency by investment schemes (so-
called ‘golden passports’ and ‘golden visas’) in the EU. It looks at the economic social and political impacts of such
schemes and examines the risks they carry in respect of corruption, money laundering and tax evasion.
Estudio EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 4Security of ID cards and of residence documents issued to EU citizens and their families
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 13-07-2018
Autor EISELE Katharina
Ámbito político Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia | Mercado interior y unión aduanera | Seguridad y defensa | Transporte |
Turismo
Palabra clave Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | datos
personales | derecho de residencia | documento de identidad | estudio de impacto | extranjero | frontera exterior de la
UE | libertad de circulación | libre circulación de personas | propuesta (UE)
Resumen Currently, there are at least 86 different versions of ID cards, and 181 types of residence documents in circulation in
the EU. The format and minimum standards for ID cards and residence documents is not regulated on EU level. In
order to strengthen the security features of ID cards and residence documents of EU citizens and their non-EU family
members, the European Commission published a legislative proposal. The impact assessment accompanying this
proposal clearly explains the problems currently encountered, and proposes adequate solutions. The Commission
used different sources to substantiate the impact assessment and also undertook several stakeholder consultation
activities. However, it is not systematically indicated which stakeholder group prefers which specific option. At times
the impact assessment displays a lack of quantification, about which the Commission is open. More detailed
information on the safeguards regarding the fundamental rights impact would have been desirable.
Briefing EN
Brexit Literature Update 02/2018
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 21-02-2018
Autor HULME BENJAMIN | PAPAGEORGIOU IOANNIS
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | derecho del individuo | extranjero | Irlanda | mercado financiero | negociación de acuerdo (UE) |
país tercero | política de medio ambiente | Reino Unido | relación bilateral | retirada de la UE
Resumen Following a relevant request by the Committee on Constitutional Affairs, the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and
Constitutional Affairs has been compiling, on a regular basis, academic and scholarly material related to the process
of, and the negotiations on, the withdrawal of the UK from the EU. Since the June 2016 referendum in the UK, Brexit-
related literature has grown significantly and it is probably going to expand further in the future. Thus, this compilation
is far from exhaustive; rather, it identifies some of the more useful articles, taking into account, in particular, the
following elements:
•Scholarly rather than a journalistic character of the publication
•Originality and interest
•Recent publication
•Be of interest for the EU
•Constitutional or institutional relevance.
De un vistazo EN
Single Digital Gateway: how EU could meet expectations of citizens and businesses?
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 15-02-2018
Autor externo Dr. Charlotte Duke
Ámbito político Adopción de legislación por el PE y el Consejo | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos | Evaluación de
la legislación y las políticas en la práctica | Mercado interior y unión aduanera | Planificación prospectiva | Protección
de los consumidores
Palabra clave acceso a la información | ciudadano de la UE | cooperación administrativa | digitalización | empresa | flujo
transfronterizo de datos | formalidad administrativa | intercambio de información | mercado único digital | protección del
consumidor | servicio | sistema de información
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 5The Brexit process: Moving to the second phase of negotiations
Tipo de publicaciónBriefing
Fecha 20-12-2017
AutorCIRLIG Carmen-Cristina | POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova
Ámbito políticoDemocracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra claveciudadano de la UE | Estado miembro UE | extranjero | frontera exterior de la UE | Irlanda | Irlanda del Norte |
migración familiar | negociación de acuerdo (UE) | país tercero | pérdida financiera | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE |
seguridad social
Resumen The first phase of Brexit talks between the EU and UK negotiating teams needed six rounds of discussion over seven
months. Finally, on Friday 8 December, an agreement in principle on the three priority issues – citizens’ rights, a
financial settlement and Northern Ireland – was reached. The European Commission President, Jean-Claude Juncker,
and the UK Prime Minister, Theresa May, endorsed a joint report setting out a common understanding on the future
withdrawal agreement. Whilst a number of specific aspects are still under discussion, the European Council decided on
15 December that 'sufficient progress' had been achieved on the first-phase priority issues, and that negotiations could
move on to the second phase – on transitional arrangements and the future EU-UK relationship – provided the
commitments from the joint report are fully translated into the draft withdrawal agreement. For the transitional period,
the European Parliament and the European Council have made clear that all existing Union regulatory, budgetary,
supervisory, judiciary and enforcement instruments and structures must apply, including the competence of the Court
of Justice of the European Union, but with no UK participation in decision-making, since it would no longer be a
member of the EU. Exploratory discussions on the framework for the future relationship will begin only after the
adoption by the European Council of additional guidelines in March 2018. The UK has still to clarify its position on the
type of trade deal it seeks with the EU.
Briefing EN
Sufficient progress in first-phase Brexit talks
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 08-12-2017
Autor CIRLIG Carmen-Cristina | POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | Estado miembro UE | extranjero | frontera exterior de la UE | Irlanda | Irlanda del Norte |
migración familiar | negociación de acuerdo (UE) | país tercero | pérdida financiera | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE |
seguridad social
Resumen After seven months of talks, the EU and the UK reached agreement in principle on the key withdrawal issues, on 8
December 2017. The European Council (EU-27) of 15 December will decide whether sufficient progress has been
achieved in order to proceed to the second phase of negotiations.
De un vistazo EN
The political crisis in Venezuela
Tipo de publicaciónBriefing
Fecha 07-12-2017
AutorGOMEZ RAMIREZ Enrique
Ámbito políticoAsuntos exteriores
Palabra claveciudadano de la UE | crisis política | escasez de alimentos | libertad de opinión | oposición política | papel internacional
de la UE | Parlamento nacional | situación económica | situación política | situación social | sociedad civil (movimientos
de opinión) | tipo de cambio | Venezuela
Resumen In December 2015, the results of elections to the Venezuelan National Assembly saw the Democratic Unity
Roundtable coalition (MUD) prevail by a wide majority over the ruling Socialist Unified Party of Venezuela (PSUV) of
President Nicolás Maduro. Since then, Venezuela has faced increasing political crisis. Initiatives by the duly elected
Parliament have been systematically blocked, first by the Supreme Court of Justice (TSJ) and the National Electoral
Council, and since August 2017 by the new National Constituent Assembly, which has taken over most of the
Parliament's legislative powers. Two attempts at dialogue between the Venezuelan government and the opposition,
promoted by international mediators, have so far failed to break the deadlock. The economic and social situation in the
country is far from improving, and the number of Venezuelan asylum-seekers abroad has risen exponentially.
Nevertheless, regional elections were finally held on 15 October 2017 – with a PSUV victory in 17 of the 23
Venezuelan states, amid accusations of fraud from the opposition – and the government has promised to go ahead
with the presidential elections due in 2018. This is an update of a briefing published in October 2017.
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 6UK Withdrawal (‘Brexit’) and the Good Friday Agreement
Tipo de publicación Estudio
Fecha 22-11-2017
Autor externo Dr. David PHINNEMORE
Dr. Katy HAYWARD
Ámbito político Comercio internacional | Cultura | Empleo | Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia | Protección de los consumidores |
Transporte
Palabra clave Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea | ciudadano de la UE | coexistencia pacífica | control
fronterizo | cooperación económica | dimensión transfronteriza | extranjero | frontera exterior de la UE | Irlanda | Irlanda
del Norte | negociación de acuerdo (UE) | país tercero | política de visados de la UE | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE
Resumen Upon request by the AFCO Committee, the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs
commissioned this study on UK withdrawal and the Good Friday Agreement (the ‘Agreement’). It provides an overview
of the Agreement and an assessment of the potential challenges posed to its implementation by ‘Brexit’. In particular, it
examines ways in which – through differentiation and ‘flexible and imaginative solutions’ – the Agreement can be
upheld and the context for its effective implementation maintained.
Estudio EN
Single digital gateway
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 10-10-2017
Autor EISELE Katharina
Ámbito político Mercado interior y unión aduanera
Palabra clave acceso a la información | ciudadano de la UE | cooperación administrativa | empresa | estudio de impacto | flujo
transfronterizo de datos | formalidad administrativa | intercambio de información | mercado único | propuesta (UE) |
servicio | sistema de información
Resumen This note seeks to provide an initial analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the European Commission's Impact
Assessment (IA) accompanying the above proposal, submitted on 2 May 2017 and referred to Parliament's Committee
on Internal Market and Consumer Protection. The initiative seeks to reduce as much as possible the additional
administrative burden that EU citizens and businesses face when they expand their activities to other Member States.
To achieve this, the IA explains that the single digital gateway should provide access to the national rules,
requirements and procedures that citizens and businesses from other Member States need to know about and comply
with. To assist the user with this journey, the gateway should cover three layers, namely information, procedures and
assistance services. The REFIT Platform Government Group confirmed the significance of a 'user journey approach'
(IA, p. 5). The proposal on the single digital gateway is one of the initiatives falling under the Commission's 2015 single
market strategy. The proposal also forms part of the 'compliance package', which, alongside the single digital gateway,
sets out a single market information tool and the SOLVIT action plan. In addition, the REFIT Platform (consisting of
business stakeholders and Member State representatives) published an opinion in June 2016 recommending the
establishment of a single entry point with clear information and coordinated services for businesses in each Member
State to assist companies operating in the single market, and the definition of minimum common quality criteria for
content.
Briefing EN
Celebrating the European Day of Languages
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 20-09-2017
Autor KATSAROVA Ivana
Ámbito político Cultura
Palabra clave campaña de sensibilización | capacidades lingüísticas | ciudadano de la UE | lenguaje | Parlamento Europeo |
pluralismo cultural | plurilingüismo | uso de las lenguas
Resumen Following the success of the European Year of Languages (2001), the Council of Europe designated 26 September as
the European Day of Languages. Since then, annual celebrations of this day have been held to promote the rich
linguistic and cultural diversity of Europe. The European Parliament has consistently acted to support endangered
languages and linguistic diversity in the EU, calling on the EU and the Member States to commit resources to their
protection and promotion.
De un vistazo EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 7Brexit negotiations - Progress to date
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 15-09-2017
Autor CIRLIG Carmen-Cristina
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave acuerdo comercial | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | frontera exterior de la UE | Irlanda | negociación de
acuerdo (UE) | país tercero | pertenencia a la Unión Europea | reglamentación aduanera | Reino Unido | retirada de la
UE | tratados europeos | Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea
Resumen Since their official launch in June 2017, three rounds of negotiations on the United Kingdom's (UK) withdrawal from the
European Union (EU) have been held. So far, the EU and UK have discussed the priority issues of citizens' rights, the
financial settlement and the Irish border, but disagreements and ambiguities persist. After the third round, 'no decisive
progress' was reached, according to Michel Barnier, the EU chief negotiator, which is likely to impede any advance to
the second phase of talks in October, on transitional arrangements and the future EU-UK partnership, including trade
relations.
De un vistazo EN
Brexit negotiations [What Think Tanks are thinking]
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 08-09-2017
Autor CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | competencia institucional (UE) | Estado miembro UE | grupo de reflexión | institución comunitaria
| integración europea | Irlanda | mandamiento de detención europeo | mercado único | negociación de acuerdo (UE) |
política europea de defensa | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE | Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea | unión
aduanera
Resumen The first three rounds of negotiations on the terms of the United Kingdom's withdrawal from the European Union have
generated only modest progress, with the two sides divided on the first-phase issues, namely the size of the UK's
financial obligations on leaving the EU, the rights of EU citizens within the UK and of UK citizens within the EU after
Brexit, and the specific problem of how to deal with the border between Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland.
This note offers links to recent commentaries and reports published by major international think tanks and other
organisations on EU-UK negotiations and on the implications of Brexit more widely.
Briefing EN
The Brexit negotiations: Issues for the first phase
Tipo de publicación Análisis en profundidad
Fecha 22-06-2017
Autor D'ALFONSO Alessandro | MCELDOWNEY James | POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova | TILINDYTE-HUMBURG
Laura
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos |
Presupuesto
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | demanda de empleo | Derecho de la seguridad social | derecho de
residencia | extranjero | frontera exterior de la UE | Irlanda | Irlanda del Norte | libre circulación de personas | Reino
Unido | residencia de estudiantes | retirada de la UE | sistema sanitario | transferencia de derechos de pensión
Resumen Negotiations on the arrangements for the UK's withdrawal from the EU started on 19 June 2017. The European
Commission is negotiating on behalf of the EU, on the basis of the European Council guidelines and the mandate
given to it by the Council. The European Parliament, for its part, has laid down key principles and conditions for its
approval of a UK withdrawal agreement. Three key priorities are set to dominate the first phase of the negotiations
(with the future relationship between the EU and the UK being left to a second phase). These are: citizens' rights for
EU-27 citizens in the UK and UK citizens in the EU-27; the settlement of the UK's financial obligations; and ensuring
the Northern Ireland peace process is not compromised. This paper looks at the EU negotiating position and the major
issues raised under those three priorities to date.
Análisis en profundidad DE, EN, FR
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 8The consequences of Brexit on Services and Establishment. Different Scenarios for Exit and Future
Cooperation
Tipo de publicación Análisis en profundidad
Fecha 15-06-2017
Autor externo Prof. Dr Friedemann Kainer
Ámbito político Adopción de legislación por el PE y el Consejo | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos | Evaluación de
la legislación y las políticas en la práctica | Mercado interior y unión aduanera | Planificación prospectiva | Protección
de los consumidores
Palabra clave acuerdo comercial (UE) | Acuerdo de Asociación (UE) | acuerdo de libre comercio | ciudadano de la UE | derecho de
residencia | Espacio Económico Europeo | industria de servicios | intercambios intra-UE | mercado único | negociación
internacional | país tercero | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE
Resumen This paper addresses the challenges Brexit will pose to the future of trade in services between the EU and the UK. It
discusses the specific barriers to cross-border establishment and trade in services and possible solutions for a future
EU-UK trade agreement. Hereby, it takes existing EU Free Trade Agreements with other states into consideration.
This research paper has been commissioned by Policy Department at the request of the Internal Market and
Consumer Protection Committee.
Análisis en profundidad EN
The impact of Brexit in relation to the right to petition and on the competences, responsibilities and
activities of the Committee on Petitions
Tipo de publicación Estudio
Fecha 14-06-2017
Autor externo Professor Eleanor SPAVENTA, Durham Law School, Durham University, UK
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario | Peticiones al Parlamento Europeo
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | Comisión PE | Defensor del Pueblo Europeo | Derecho de la UE | estudio de impacto | extranjero
| frontera exterior de la UE | Iniciativa Ciudadana Europea | Irlanda | país tercero | petición | Reino Unido |
representación diplomática | residencia | retirada de la UE
Resumen Upon request by the PETI Committee, this study considers issues raised in petitions to the European Parliament by
citizens concerned about the way Brexit will impact on their rights. In particular, it first looks at the changes that Brexit
will determine in relation to voting rights, the right to petition, the right to apply to the European Ombudsman and the
European Citizens’ Initiative. It then focuses at length on the way Brexit will affect UK citizens in the EU-27, and EU
citizens living in the UK. In this respect, it considers challenges and risks for both citizens who have resided in the EU-
27 or the UK for less than 5 years, and for those who have already acquired the right to permanent residence at the
time of Brexit.
Estudio EN
La libre circulación de personas
Tipo de publicaciónFichas temáticas sobre la EU
Fecha 01-06-2017
AutorMARZOCCHI Ottavio
Ámbito políticoEspacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra claveAcuerdo de Schengen | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | control fronterizo | espacio de libertad, seguridad y
justicia | migración familiar | política de visados de la UE | política migratoria de la UE
Resumen El derecho de las personas a circular y residir libremente dentro de la Unión Europea constituye la piedra angular de
la ciudadanía de la Unión que creó el Tratado de Maastricht de 1992. Tras la supresión gradual de las fronteras
interiores conforme a los Acuerdos de Schengen, se adoptó la Directiva 2004/38/CE relativa al derecho de los
ciudadanos de la Unión y de los miembros de sus familias a circular y residir libremente en el territorio de los Estados
miembros. A pesar de la importancia que reviste este derecho, diez años después de la expiración del plazo fijado
para ello, subsisten importantes obstáculos a la aplicación de las disposiciones de la Directiva.
Fichas temáticas sobre BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV
la EU
The citizens of the Union and their rights
Tipo de publicaciónFichas temáticas sobre la EU
Fecha 01-04-2017
AutorBUX Udo
Ámbito políticoEspacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra claveaplicación de la ley | Carta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía
europea | Convención Europea de Derechos Humanos | elecciones europeas | protección de las libertades | Tratado
de Funcionamiento de la UE | Tratado de la Unión Europea | Tratado de Lisboa
Resumen European citizenship is enshrined in the Treaties (Article 20 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union
(TFEU) and Article 9 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU)). It is an essential factor in the formation of a European
identity. European citizenship exists as a complement to citizenship of a Member State. The main difference between
the two is that the rights that citizens enjoy as a result of European citizenship are not matched with duties.
Fichas temáticas sobre EL, EN, NL, PL
la EU
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 9The Brexit Negotiations: An Assessment of the Legal, Political and Institutional Situation in the UK
Tipo de publicación Análisis en profundidad
Fecha 16-03-2017
Autor externo Charles GRANT
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario | Derecho de la UE: sistema jurídico y actos legislativos
Palabra clave acuerdo de libre comercio | análisis económico | ciudadano de la UE | economía nacional | Escocia | Estados Unidos |
Gobierno | mercado financiero | migración comunitaria | Parlamento nacional | periodo transitorio (UE) | pertenencia a
la Unión Europea | profundización de la Unión Europea | Reino Unido | retirada de la UE | seguridad europea | Tratado
de Lisboa | Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea
Resumen Upon request by the AFCO Committee, the Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional Affairs
commissioned an in-depth analysis on the political and institutional situation in the United Kingdom following the
referendum on the UK’s withdrawal from the EU. The research analyses the post-Brexit political developments in the
UK, the various parameters that should be taken into account, by both the UK government and the 27, in view of the
Article 50 negotiations and the possible shape of the final deal and the future economic relationship, taking into
account the EU obligations and the constraints of Theresa May’s government.
Análisis en profundidad EN
Major changes in European public opinion towards the EU since1973 - 2015 Edition
Tipo de publicaciónEstudio
Fecha 05-02-2016
AutorNANCY Jacques
Ámbito políticoDemocracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra claveciudadano de la UE | estadística de la UE | Europa de los ciudadanos | funcionamiento institucional | historia de
Europa | identidad europea | institución comunitaria | opinión pública | pertenencia a la Unión Europea | política de la
UE | recesión económica | reseña histórica | situación de la Unión Europea | situación económica
Resumen This desk research focusses on the major shifts in European public opinion towards the European Union since 1973,
when Eurobarometer was created by Jacques-René Rabier. The results are presented in a timeline and illustrate the
evolution of citizens' opinion in the key phases of the Union's institutional, political, economic and social development.
This is the second edition of the 2014 Desk Research, updated with results of the 2015 Parlemeter. The main findings
on the evolution of public opinion in the last 40 years from 1973 to 2014 show that it has gone up and down, notably
in response to financial, economic and social crises. The major institutional and political staging-posts in the EU's
development have generally improved the perception of the EU. This is particularly true of enlargements and elections
to the European Parliament. This analysis shows the overriding influence of the economic and social context on public
opinion. This is very well illustrated by the financial and economic crisis which began in 2008, prompting a sharp
decline in indicators of support for the EU. However, even in this context of crisis, results show that Europeans remain
committed to Europe when it comes to basic EU values. FR Please click here for the full publication in PDF format
Estudio EN, FR
Disenfranchisement of EU citizens resident abroad: Situation in national and European elections in EU
Member States
Tipo de publicación
Análisis en profundidad
Fecha30-06-2015
Autor
POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova
Ámbito político
Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave
Alemania | Chipre | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | Derecho de la UE - Derecho nacional | derecho de voto
| Derecho electoral | Dinamarca | elecciones europeas | elecciones nacionales | interpretación del Derecho | Irlanda |
libertad de circulación | Malta | privación de derechos | Reino Unido
Resumen The right to vote is a fundamental one and of utmost importance for the democratic legitimacy of any public power. Six
EU Member States deprive their nationals permanently resident abroad of the right to vote in national parliamentary
elections. They also deprive such citizens residing in a third country of the vote in European elections, and two of them
even when their nationals live in another EU Member State.
Citizens disenfranchised in their country of origin often face exclusion from political life at national level in both their
country of origin and of residence. In the case of citizens living in another EU Member State, the disenfranchisement
rules could even amount to an infringement of their freedom of movement and residence under EU law.
Solutions discussed include a Treaty change to allow EU citizens to vote in national parliamentary elections in their
host Member State or to be able to choose between voting there or in their Member State of nationality. A more
realistic solution envisages the abolition of disenfranchisement rules in those six Member States concerned, although
such calls from EU institutions have found very limited favour in the six concerned.
This in-depth-analysis updates an earlier one of December 2014.
Análisis en profundidad DE, EN, FR
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 10The US Legal System on Data Protection in the Field of Law Enforcement. Safeguards, Rights and
Remedies for EU Citizens
Tipo de publicación
Estudio
Fecha15-05-2015
Autor externo
Francesca Bignami (George Washington University Law School, Washington, USA)
Ámbito político
Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave
atentado contra la seguridad del Estado | ciudadano de la UE | comunicación de datos | espionaje | Estados Unidos |
fuentes del Derecho | investigación judicial | protección de datos | protección de la vida privada | recogida de datos |
sistema judicial
Resumen Upon request by the LIBE Committee, this study surveys the US legal system of data protection in the field of federal
law enforcement. It reviews two principal sources of US data protection law, the Fourth Amendment to the US
Constitution and the Privacy Act of 1974. It also considers the legally prescribed methods of data collection, together
with their associated data protection guarantees, in ordinary criminal investigations and national security investigations.
Throughout, the study pays special attention to the rights afforded to EU citizens.
Estudio EN
'Foreign fighters' - Member States' responses and EU action in an international context
Tipo de publicaciónBriefing
Fecha 05-02-2015
AutorBAKOWSKI Piotr | PUCCIO Laura
Ámbito políticoAsuntos exteriores | Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra claveCarta de los Derechos Fundamentales de la Unión Europea | ciudadano de la UE | competencia extraterritorial |
cooperación policial | cooperación policial (UE) | Derecho penal | Estado miembro UE | Estados Unidos | nacionalidad |
recogida de datos | sanción penal | seguridad europea | servicio secreto | terrorismo | viajero
Resumen As the hostilities in Syria and Iraq continue and terrorism activities worldwide seem to be on the rise, EU Member
States are increasingly confronted with the problem of aspiring and returning 'foreign fighters'. Whereas the
phenomenon is not new, its scale certainly is, which explains the wide perception of these individuals as a serious
threat to the security of both individual Member States and the EU as a whole. The problem has been addressed within
international fora including the United Nations, which in 2014 adopted a binding resolution specifically addressing the
issue of foreign fighters. The EU is actively engaged in relevant international initiatives. Within the EU, security in
general and counter-terrorism in particular have traditionally remained in the Member States' remit. The EU has
however coordinated Member States' activities regarding the prevention of radicalisation, the detection of suspicious
travel, criminal justice response and cooperation with third countries. The EU is seeking to strengthen its role given the
widely shared feeling of insecurity in the wake of recent terrorist attacks. Existing and new paths for EU action are
being explored, including the revived EU passenger name records (PNR) proposal. Individual Member States have
stepped up their efforts to address the problem using various kinds of tools including criminal law, administrative
measures and 'soft tools', such as counter-radicalisation campaigns. The Member States most affected have also
cooperated with each other outside the EU framework. The United States has a particularly developed counter-
terrorism framework now being used to deal with foreign fighters. Since 9/11, the EU and the US have cooperated on
counter-terrorism despite different philosophies on issues such as data protection.
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 11Disenfranchisement of EU citizens resident abroad - Situation in national and European elections in EU
Member States
Tipo de publicación Análisis en profundidad
Fecha 10-12-2014
Autor POPTCHEVA Eva-Maria Alexandrova
Ámbito político Democracia en la UE, Derecho institucional y parlamentario
Palabra clave Alemania | Chipre | ciudadano de la UE | ciudadanía europea | Convención Europea de Derechos Humanos | Derecho
de la UE - Derecho nacional | derecho de voto | Derecho electoral | Dinamarca | elecciones europeas | elecciones
generales | elecciones nacionales | Irlanda | libre circulación de personas | Malta | privación de derechos | Reino Unido
Resumen The right to vote in elections is a fundamental right common to the constitutional traditions of the Member States, and
recognised in the EU Treaties as intrinsically related to the right of political participation which, for its part, provides
democratic legitimacy to those exercising public power. This right is not absolute though and is subject to restrictions.
The decision of who is conferred the right to vote in national and also in European elections lies with states.
Six EU Member States deprive their nationals, under varying conditions, of the right to vote in national parliamentary
elections due to residence abroad, both in other Member States and in third countries. These same six Member States
also disenfranchise their nationals in European elections, if they live permanently in a third country, and two of them
even do so in respect of nationals resident within the EU.
'Disenfranchisement' due to residence abroad can be a result of minimum residence requirements in the country in
which elections take place as well as of losing electoral rights due to time spent abroad. The lack of facilities to vote
from abroad, while rendering the exercise of voting rights difficult, does not amount to their loss as
such.Disenfranchisement is based on the assumption that expatriates are not affected by the political decisions taken
in their country of nationality and that they are not able to cast a meaningful vote due to lack of knowledge of the
political reality there. Globalisation and improved communication means have however induced a tendency towards
enfranchising expatriates.
Citizens deprived of their right to vote in national elections in their country of nationality often face exclusion from
political life at national level in both their state of residence and their state of origin since EU Member States (and more
so third countries) do not generally provide any right to vote in national elections to non-nationals. Whilst the European
Court of Human Rights saw no infringement of Convention rights from disenfranchisement rules, the loss of electoral
rights for citizens who move to another EU Member State could be seen as an infringement upon the freedom of
movement under EU law, since it could potentially stop EU citizens from exercising their free movement rights.
Different solutions have been discussed. Actions at EU level include a possible infringement procedure against those
Member States who disenfranchise their nationals resident elsewhere in the EU, as well as a Treaty change to include
a voting right for EU citizens in their host Member State or the right to choose to vote in national elections either in their
Member State of nationality or in the host Member State. Another proposal, which is more realistic in the short term, is
to convince Member States to enfranchise nationals living in another EU Member State or at least to enhance the
conditions for them to preserve their right to vote.
Análisis en profundidad EN, FR
European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps
Tipo de publicación De un vistazo
Fecha 20-02-2014
Autor LECARTE Jacques
Ámbito político Desarrollo y ayuda humanitaria
Palabra clave ayuda a los siniestrados | ciudadano de la UE | cooperante | ECHO | evaluación de la ayuda | financiación de la UE |
organización benéfica | organización no gubernamental | voluntariado social | voluntario internacional
Resumen The European Commission's proposal for the setting up of a European Voluntary Humanitarian Aid Corps (EVHAC) is
aimed at encouraging young Europeans to contribute to EU humanitarian aid operations and make them more visible.
With pilot volunteers already on the ground, adoption of the proposed regulation will ensure the initiative maximises its
contribution to EU aid objectives.
De un vistazo EN
Switzerland Votes ‘Against Mass Immigration’: How Can the EU Respond?
Tipo de publicación Briefing
Fecha 13-02-2014
Autor DE MICCO Pasquale
Ámbito político Espacio de libertad, seguridad y justicia
Palabra clave ciudadano de la UE | cláusula de salvaguardia | denuncia de un acuerdo | derecho de residencia | libre circulación de
personas | negociación de acuerdo (UE) | política migratoria | referéndum | Suiza | trabajador migrante
Resumen The EU-Switzerland Agreement on the Free Movement of Persons, signed in 1999, is linked to six other agreements.
As the EU incorporated new Member States, the bilateral agreements with Switzerland were extended to new EU
countries. The Swiss government has already applied a ‘safeguard clause’ to limit the longterm residence permits for
EU citizens. The Swiss authorities must implement the referendum within three years. The EU may choose among
different courses of action, which would involve the European Parliament to different degrees. The seven linked
agreements could be terminated… or suspended. Negotiations on the wider institutional framework for bilateral
relations may also be frozen. The referendum confirms the need for a new framework.
Briefing EN
30-12-2021 Fuente : © Unión Europea, 2021 - PE 12You can also read
