Identifying habitat and understanding movement resistance for the Endangered Bornean banteng Bos javanicus lowi in Sabah, Malaysia-ORCA

Page created by Neil Grant
 
CONTINUE READING
Identifying habitat and understanding movement resistance for the Endangered Bornean banteng Bos javanicus lowi in Sabah, Malaysia-ORCA
Identifying habitat and understanding movement
              resistance for the Endangered Bornean banteng
              Bos javanicus lowi in Sabah, Malaysia
                                                                            HONG YE LIM, PENNY C. GARDNER, NICOLA K. ABRAM
                                                                                       K A L S U M M . Y U S A H and B E N O I T G O O S S E N S

              Abstract Habitat prioritization and corridor restoration are                                   Keywords Bornean banteng, Borneo, Bos javanicus lowi,
              important steps for reconnecting fragmented habitats and                                       conservation, habitat suitability, maximum entropy,
              species populations, and spatial modelling approaches are use-                                 movement resistance, Sabah
              ful in identifying suitable habitat for elusive tropical rainforest
                                                                                                             Supplementary material for this article is available at
              mammals. The Endangered Bornean banteng Bos javanicus
                                                                                                             https://doi.org/./S
              lowi, a wild bovid endemic to Borneo, occurs in habitat that
              is highly fragmented as a result of extensive agricultural ex-
              pansion. Based on the species’ historical distribution in
              Sabah (Malaysia), we conducted camera-trap surveys in 
                                                                                                             Introduction
              forest reserves during –. To assess suitable habitat
              for the banteng we used a presence-only maximum entropy
              (MaxEnt) approach with  spatial predictors, including cli-
              mate, infrastructure, land cover and land use, and topography
                                                                                                             H      uman-induced destruction of natural ecosystems
                                                                                                                    is one of the major threats to global biodiversity
                                                                                                             (Cincotta et al., ), with c. % of all known species
              variables. We performed a least-cost path analysis using                                       threatened by destructive human activities (IUCN, ).
              Linkage Mapper, to understand the resistance to movement                                       Endemic species of Borneo are among the most vulnerable
              through the landscape. The surveys comprised a total of                                        to timber extraction, deforestation for oil palm, habitat
              , nights of camera trapping. We recorded banteng pres-                                    fragmentation and poaching (Gaveau et al., ; Hoffmann
              ence in  forest reserves. Key spatial predictors deemed to be                                et al., ). Effective protection of these species requires
              important in predicting suitable habitat included soil associa-                                a strategic conservation approach, involving in particular
              tions (.%), distance to intact and logged forests (.%),                                  habitat protection and connectivity restoration (Koh &
              precipitation in the driest quarter (.%), distance to agro-                                 Sodhi, ).
              forest and regenerating forest (.%), and distance to oil                                        In this study our focal species was the Bornean banteng
              palm plantations (.%). Circa % of Sabah had suitable habi-                                 Bos javanicus lowi, a wild bovid subspecies endemic to
              tat (, km), of which .% was in protected forests, .%                                Borneo (Gardner et al., ; Ishige et al., ). There are
              was in production forests and .% was in other areas. The                                    two other subspecies, the mainland banteng B. javanicus
              least-cost path model predicted  linkages and a relatively                                   birmanicus (Indochina) and the Javan banteng B. javanicus
              high movement resistance between core habitats. Our models                                     javanicus (Java and Bali); all three are categorized as
              provide information about key habitat and movement resist-                                     Endangered on the IUCN Red List (Gardner et al., ).
              ance for bantengs through the landscape, which is crucial for                                  Bornean bantengs inhabit primary and secondary diptero-
              constructive conservation strategies and land-use planning.                                    carp and swamp forests and are best described as mixed-
                                                                                                             feeders (Gardner et al., ). They endure secondary forest
                                                                                                             conditions and benefit from the temporary increases
              HONG YE LIM* (Corresponding author,     orcid.org/0000-0003-0699-5187) and
              KALSUM M. YUSAH Institute for Tropical Biology and Conservation, Universiti
                                                                                                             in regenerating vegetation in early stages of a logged
              Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia                                                 forest but only when human disturbances are infrequent
              E-mail limhongye90@gmail.com                                                                   (Gardner, ; Prosser et al., ; Journeaux et al., ).
              PENNY C. GARDNER† and BENOIT GOOSSENS†‡ Danau Girang Field Centre, Sabah                       When the ambient temperature is high they rest in the
              Wildlife Department, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
                                                                                                             shade of closed canopy forest to reduce heat stress and
              NICOLA K. ABRAM§ Living Landscape Alliance, Berkshire, UK                                      avoid dehydration (Gardner, ). They favour foraging
              *Also at: Danau Girang Field Centre, Sabah Wildlife Department, Wisma Muis,                    ground close to permanent water sources, where they
              Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia
              †Also at: Organisms and Environment Division, Cardiff School of Biosciences,                   also socialize (Davies & Payne, ). Deforestation and
              Cardiff University, UK                                                                         the establishment of extensive monoculture plantations,
              ‡Also at: Sustainable Places Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK               especially of oil palm, have resulted in a highly frag-
              §Also at: ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, The
              University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia                                                  mented population (Gardner, ).
              Received  February . Revision requested  April .                                       Banteng occurrence records in Sarawak (Malaysian
              Accepted  August . First published online  May .                                   Borneo), Brunei and Kalimantan (Indonesian Borneo) are

              This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use,
Downloaded from    https://www.cambridge.org/core.
             distribution,                            IP address:
                           and reproduction in any medium,        82.16.166.249,
                                                           provided               on 03
                                                                    the original work is Feb 2021cited.
                                                                                         properly at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
                          Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Identifying habitat and understanding movement resistance for the Endangered Bornean banteng Bos javanicus lowi in Sabah, Malaysia-ORCA
Bornean banteng in Sabah, Malaysia       123

           scarce and our understanding of the banteng’s distribution                              the Species Action Plan for the Bornean banteng, and other
           across its range in Borneo is limited (Gardner et al., ).                           conservation efforts in Sabah.
           For Sabah, Davies & Payne () published the first state-
           wide banteng distribution map, and estimated a population
           size of c. – individuals. However, the community                                  Study area
           interviews and sign surveys they used were dependent on
                                                                                                   Our study covered the Malaysian state of Sabah, in the
           accessibility. Boonratana () used line transects to iden-
                                                                                                   north of Borneo. Based on the historical distribution of the
           tify banteng presence in several forest reserves in Sabah,
                                                                                                   Bornean banteng (Davies & Payne, ), we conducted
           and estimated the population to be ,  individuals.
                                                                                                   camera-trap surveys in  forest reserves (Fig. ). Forests in
           Indirect density estimation based on dung was impossible
                                                                                                   these reserves consisted of primary and secondary tropical
           because of low encounter rates along the line transects,
                                                                                                   lowland and mixed hill dipterocarp forest, montane forest
           which covered a total distance of  km. Gardner ()
                                                                                                   and seasonal swamp forest. A history of various management
           estimated the population size in Tabin Wildlife Reserve
                                                                                                   approaches and timber harvesting regimes has resulted in an
           ( individuals) and Malua Forest Reserve ( individuals)
                                                                                                   extensive network of logging roads, trails and openings. In
           using photographic evidence captured by camera traps.
                                                                                                   Sabah forests are categorized as Protection Forest Reserves,
           Localized extinctions have occurred in the Dent Peninsula
                                                                                                   Production Forest Reserves and Protected Areas. Both
           of Sabah (Gardner, ).
                                                                                                   Protection and Production Forest Reserves are under
               The increasing availability of spatial modelling ap-
                                                                                                   the authority of Sabah Forestry Department, whereas
           proaches, and higher-quality and relevant environmental
                                                                                                   Protected Areas are governed by Sabah Parks and Sabah
           data facilitate habitat prioritization and connectivity restor-
                                                                                                   Wildlife Department (Supplementary Material ; Sabah
           ation (Beier et al., ; Elith & Leathwick, ). However,
                                                                                                   Forestry Department, ).
           spatial modelling has not been used previously to examine
           distribution patterns of the Bornean banteng. Among the
           available modelling methods, maximum entropy (MaxEnt)                                   Methods
           is popular because it can model presence-only data and
           multidimensional interactions between variables (Elith                                  Camera trapping
           et al., ). Trisurat et al. () used MaxEnt to model
           current and future distribution patterns of the mainland                                We deployed Reconyx HC and PC camera traps
           banteng in northern Thailand under scenarios of changes                                 (Reconyx Inc., Holmen, USA) in the  forest reserves dur-
           in land use and climate, and highlighted areas in need of                               ing – to detect the occurrence of Bornean bantengs,
           protection. MaxEnt has also been used for distribution                                  using grid (Gardner, ) and opportunistic sampling de-
           modelling for other Bornean and Malayan taxa; e.g. the                                  signs (Supplementary Table ). Four grids were established
           flat-headed cat Prionailurus planiceps, Malayan sun                                     in Tabin Wildlife Reserve and three in Malua Forest Reserve
           bear Helarctos malayanus and Bornean ferret badger                                      (Gardner, ). To avoid resampling the same banteng
           Melogale everetti (Wilting et al., , ; Nazeri et al.,                           herds, the grids were spaced at least  km apart, as bantengs
           ).                                                                                  have been observed to travel at least  km (Gardner et al.,
               Identifying potential connectivity for reconnecting forest                          ). The distance between camera-trap stations in each
           fragments is crucial for the banteng, as habitat fragmen-                               grid was c.  m, to increase the chances of detection
           tation has disrupted movement and, potentially, gene                                    (Gardner, ). The total number of camera-trap stations
           flow (Hu et al., ; Gardner, ). Linkage Mapper                                   used in the grid surveys was . We employed an opportun-
           (McRae & Kavanagh, ) can be used to simulate potential                              istic sampling design in the remaining  forest reserves, to
           wildlife corridors and movement resistance. Brodie et al.                               locate remnants of the banteng population. A total of 
           () predicted and compared efficiency between multi-                                 camera-trap stations were established in these reserves,
           species and single-species corridors in Borneo but excluded                             based on the presence of banteng signs such as footprints
           the Bornean banteng from the analysis because of its                                    and dung, on wildlife trails, riverbanks, ridges, active and
           restricted distribution.                                                                abandoned logging roads, stumping sites and in both open
               A better understanding of current banteng distribution                              and closed-canopy conditions. Each camera-trap station
           and identification of suitable habitats and movement resis-                             comprised two opposing camera traps and captured three
           tance across Sabah are necessary for planning and drafting                              images per trigger (one image per second), each stamped
           policy to protect the species. The aim of this study was there-                         with the time, date and ambient temperature. We recorded
           fore to enhance our knowledge of the distribution of the                                the location of each station using a GPS. All stations
           Bornean banteng in Sabah, Malaysia, by identifying suitable                             operated  h per day for at least  days. Every  days
           habitat and then estimating the resistance of movement of                               we performed maintenance checks to ensure functionality
           banteng between habitat patches. This research will inform                              of camera traps and retrieve data.

           Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
124         H. Y. Lim et al.

                                                                                                                                                 FIG. 1 Areas surveyed for the
                                                                                                                                                 Bornean banteng Bos javanicus
                                                                                                                                                 lowi in Sabah, Malaysia.

             Preparation of banteng occurrence data for MaxEnt                                       We assessed various combinations of the number of back-
                                                                                                     ground points, regularization multiplier and features,
             MaxEnt uses presence-only data against background points.                               selected the parameters with area under the receiver
             We used the coordinates of the stations at which bantengs                               operating curve (AUC) . . and less overfitting, and pre-
             were positively identified for our presence-only dataset. To                            dicted all areas where bantengs were present. The final
             minimize the effect of spatial autocorrelation, presence data                           model specifications were , background points, a
             were filtered by creating a -km circular buffer around each                            regularization multiplier of ., linear, quadratic and pro-
             camera station (in ArcGIS .; ESRI, Redlands, USA) and                                duct features,  iterations, true response curves, true
             removing points within the buffer.                                                      jackknife test to measure variable importance, and logistic
                                                                                                     output. We chose a threshold of . based on the preva-
                                                                                                     lence of banteng occurrence in our presence–absence data-
             Preparation of spatial predictors                                                       set. To account for sampling bias we included a bias grid
             We used  spatial predictors, covering climate, infrastruc-                            raster layer in the modelling process (Syfert et al., ).
             ture, land cover and land use, soil, and topographical                                  Point density in ArcGIS was used to generate the bias grid
             variables, to describe the environmental conditions of                                  raster; the neighbourhood was set to a default. To avoid
             the landscape (Supplementary Tables ,). These facilitate                              MaxEnt dropping the bias grid raster during the modelling,
             multidimensional exploration of the impact of precipita-                                all zero values of the bias grid raster were converted to
             tion and temperature variation, geographical features and                               .. A nested -fold cross-validation was applied
             human-induced modification of natural landscapes.                                       to evaluate the predictive performance of the model using
             These predictors were extracted at a -m resolution                                    the AUC score, which indicates the model’s ability to
             (,, cells) covering the state of Sabah, excluding                                discriminate between presence and absence: , ., poor;
             several small islands.                                                                  .–., low, but better than chance; .–., intermediate;
                                                                                                     . ., high (Manel et al., ). To build a binary map of
                                                                                                     suitable and unsuitable habitats, four commonly used
             Habitat suitability modelling                                                           thresholds were assessed visually, namely minimum train-
                                                                                                     ing presence, ten percentile training presence, equal training
             We used MaxEnt v...k (Phillips et al., ; Phillips &                              sensitivity and specificity, and maximum training sensitivity
             Dudík, ) to associate the spatial predictors with the                               and specificity (Liu et al., , ). To take into account
             presence data. The MaxEnt approach is suitable for model-                               all banteng habitat for protection, we selected the threshold
             ling a rare and low-density mobile species that occurs in a                             that predicted the widest coverage of suitable areas. The
             tropical rainforest where absence data can be highly unreli-                            suitable areas were restricted to forested areas, using a
             able and data collection is often difficult (Elith et al., ).                       generic forest layer digitized from SPOT  and  satellite

                         Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
Bornean banteng in Sabah, Malaysia             125

           images from  and . This is because we assume the                                TABLE 1 Per cent contribution of  spatial variables to the habitat
           Bornean banteng to be largely a forest-dependent species,                               suitability model for the Bornean banteng Bos javanicus lowi.
           and therefore we considered areas of oil palm, smallholdings                            Environmental predictors                                        % contribution
           and settlements to be unsuitable. Areas ,  km were
                                                                                                   Soil association                                                52.6
           removed, as bantengs travel at least  km (Gardner et al.,                             Distance to intact & logged forest                              11.8
           ). Areas $  km were assigned as core areas.                                     Precipitation of driest quarter                                 10.8
                                                                                                   Distance to agro- & regenerating forest                          5.7
                                                                                                   Distance to oil palm                                             5.1
           Least-cost path analysis                                                                Distance to major river                                          3.5
                                                                                                   Seasonality of precipitation                                     3.2
           We performed a least-cost path analysis using Linkage                                   Distance to asphalt & gravel road                                2.3
           Mapper v... (McRae & Kavanagh, ), to examine the                                 Distance to severely degraded forest                             2.2
           movement resistance for the Bornean banteng across the                                  Elevation                                                        1.8
           Sabah landscape. The core suitable area was extracted and                               Annual temperature range                                         1.2
           exported as a polygon shapefile (WHCWG, ). To create
           a resistance layer, the continuous habitat suitability raster                           within or close to intact or logged forests (Fig. b), and
           layer was inverted and rescaled to – (Stevenson-Holt                                in areas with relatively higher precipitation in the driest
           et al., ). As Linkage Mapper does not simulate cells                                quarter of the year (Fig. c). The relationship between
           with no value, they were converted to . Given the lack of                            habitat suitability and distance to oil palm and agro- and
           knowledge in determining the optimal corridor width for                                 regenerating forests increased with distance up to  km
           bantengs, the effect of various corridor cut-off widths (, ,                         (Fig. d,e; Supplementary Fig. ).
           ,  and  km cost-weighted distance) on the movement                                  We selected the minimum training presence threshold
           resistance output were evaluated (Dutta et al., ).                                  (Supplementary Fig. ) to define categories of suitable and
                                                                                                   unsuitable areas on the habitat suitability model, as it had
                                                                                                   zero omission rate and predicted the widest distribution of
           Results
                                                                                                   habitat for bantengs compared to other thresholds. Circa
                                                                                                   % (, km) of Sabah was predicted to have suitable
           Camera trapping
                                                                                                   habitat, c. % ( km) of which was within Protected
           Because of electronic failure and malfunction, and unwar-                               Areas and Protection Forest Reserves, % (, km) was
           ranted human activities, the total number of camera-trap                                within Production Forest Reserves, and % (, km)
           nights was ,, and we obtained  presence and                                  was outside these areas (Table ; Fig. ).
           absence data points. Bantengs were present in  of the
            sites, namely Tabin Wildlife Reserve, Maliau Basin                                   Least-cost path and movement resistance
           Conservation Area (buffer zone), and Malua, Deramakot,
           Tangkulap, Segaliud–Lokan, Kuamut, Sipitang, Sapulut,                                   We identified  core habitat areas (–, km) for
           Sugut and Paitan Forest Reserves. After filtering was applied,                          bantengs, with a majority concentrated within the central
            presence data points remained and were used for the                                  forest (Supplementary Table ; Fig. ). The least-cost path
           analysis. Our camera traps also detected two snare injuries:                            model estimated  corridors. The least-cost path distance
           a cow with a swollen hoof in Sugut and a bull with a missing                            was .–. km, with a mean of  ± SD . km. The
           hoof in Segaliud–Lokan.                                                                 cost-weighted distance was .–, km, with a mean of
                                                                                                   ,. ± SD ,. km. The mean ratio of cost-weighted
                                                                                                   distance to least-cost path was . ± SD ., indicating a
           Habitat suitability                                                                     relatively high movement resistance for travelling between
           The habitat suitability model had a high AUC score                                      the core areas. The path connecting core areas  and 
           for model fitting (.) and -fold cross-validation                                  (both within Deramakot) was the least costly for bantengs
           (mean = . ± SD .). The five most influential spatial                              (.). The path between core areas  and  (Segaliud and
           predictors were soil association (i.e. .% of the model                               Kulamba) was the most costly (.). The  km cut-off
           contributed by soil association compared with the other                                 width was selected because . % of the cost-weighted cor-
            predictors), distance to intact and logged forests (.%),                          ridors contained . % forest and , % oil palm (Fig. ).
           precipitation in the driest quarter (.%), distance to
           agro- and regenerating forest (.%), and distance to oil                               Discussion
           palm (.%; Table ). Suitable habitat was highly associated
           with specific soil types, especially Kalabakan, Labau and                               Continuous habitat loss, fragmentation and poaching are
           Lokan (numbers ,  and , respectively, in Fig. a),                                the major threats to the Bornean banteng in Sabah. The

           Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
126         H. Y. Lim et al.

                                                                                                                                                 FIG. 2 Top five most
                                                                                                                                                 influential spatial predictors in
                                                                                                                                                 the MaxEnt model of habitat
                                                                                                                                                 suitability for the Bornean
                                                                                                                                                 banteng: (a) soil association
                                                                                                                                                 (.%); (b) distance to intact
                                                                                                                                                 and logged forest (.%);
                                                                                                                                                 (c) precipitation of driest
                                                                                                                                                 quarter (.%); (d) distance to
                                                                                                                                                 agroforest and regenerating
                                                                                                                                                 forest (.%); and (e) distance
                                                                                                                                                 to oil palm plantations (.%).

             dearth of up-to-date knowledge of distribution and popula-                              between soil types and habitat suitability, especially in
             tion size impedes conservation of this threatened species.                              Kalabakan, Lokan and Labau. Although the relationship
             Our goal was to describe the current distribution of suitable                           between mammals and soil variability in Borneo is under-
             habitat, and movement resistance for bantengs.                                          studied, soil types may have indirect impacts on wildlife
                                                                                                     habitats as a result of floristic patterns (Woinarski et al.,
                                                                                                     ). Variation in soil nutrient content determines tropical
             Habitat suitability
                                                                                                     floristic composition, density and distribution (Paoli et al.,
             Across Sabah we predicted that c. % of the land area has                              ). Sedimentary soils (in Kalabakan and Labau) are
             suitable habitat for bantengs. We found a strong association                            common in both lowland and highland areas, whereas

                         Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
Bornean banteng in Sabah, Malaysia       127

           TABLE 2 Areas suitable and unsuitable for the Bornean banteng in                        plants such as herbs (Poulsen, ), and this may limit for-
           Sabah (Fig. ), and areas protected and unprotected.                                    aging resources for bantengs. Areas that receive occasional
                                                                    Area (km2)         %
                                                                                                   rainfall during the dry season and drought are probably
                                                                                                   more suitable for this species.
           Suitability
           Suitable area                                             7,719              10.6
           Unsuitable area                                          64,994              89.4
           Total                                                    72,713             100.0       Management of banteng habitat
           Protection status
           Protection Forest Reserves &                                 940             12.2
                                                                                                   Only c. % ( km) of the area suitable for bantengs was
             Protected Areas                                                                       within Sabah’s protected forests (i.e. Protected Areas and
           Production Forest Reserves                                 4,665             60.4       Protection Forest Reserves). In these areas forest harvesting
           Outside Forest Reserve & Protected Areas                   2,114             27.4       and crop plantations are prohibited. Logged forest is present
           Total                                                      7,719            100.0       in most of them because they were under various logging re-
                                                                                                   gimes before protection. Circa % (, km) of banteng
                                                                                                   habitat fell within Production Forest Reserves, where harvest-
                                                                                                   ing of natural forest, tree plantations (acacia, eucalyptus or
           alluvium (in Lokan) prevails in the coastal zones, flood-
                                                                                                   native species), mosaic forests and oil palm are permissible
           plains and major rivers, and both sedimentary and alluvium
                                                                                                   (although no new planting of oil palm can occur). Although
           are dominated by dipterocarp species (Paoli et al., ).
                                                                                                   Production Forest Reserves are under the authority of Sabah
           Both sedimentary and alluvial soils are widespread across
                                                                                                   Forestry Department, the forests within the banteng’s habitat
           Sabah, indicating that intact dipterocarp forest might have
                                                                                                   are largely managed by Yayasan Sabah or other concession
           been common historically throughout the landscape before
                                                                                                   holders. Understanding where banteng habitat is located is
           intensive logging and forest clearance for oil palm and other
                                                                                                   critical for conservation decision making, especially as more
           land use. Bantengs could therefore have inhabited diptero-
                                                                                                   tree plantations and mosaic areas will be established in the re-
           carp forest before extensive land-use change.
                                                                                                   gion. The remaining % of habitat (, km) outside pro-
               The Bornean banteng is a forest-dependent species and
                                                                                                   tected or production forests (Fig. ) is mainly around Sipitang,
           our model also highlighted the importance of logged forests.
                                                                                                   Paitan and Sapulut and is susceptible to timber harvesting or
           Logged forest is common in Production Forest Reserves
                                                                                                   clearance for other land uses.
           and some Protected Areas and Protection Forest Reserves
                                                                                                       The size of the banteng population in Sabah is unknown
           (e.g. Tabin Wildlife Reserve). Pioneer vegetation (i.e. vines,
                                                                                                   but there are outdated estimates of – individuals
           herbs and grasses) prevails in logged forests as a result of in-
                                                                                                   (Davies & Payne, ). Our modelling of suitable habitat
           creased light levels on the forest floor, and this is favourable
                                                                                                   suggests these are spread across four populations. In 
           for the banteng (Gardner et al., ; Prosser et al., ).
                                                                                                   there were four known cases of banteng poaching (New
           Forage preferences, however, may not be the only reason
                                                                                                   Sabah Times, ), which is probably an underestimate as
           the model identified suitable habitat in logged forests, as in-
                                                                                                   many cases of poaching remain unreported. The extensive
           tact forest in Sabah is scarce as a result of expansive histor-
                                                                                                   network of active and abandoned logging roads and the ex-
           ical and current logging regimes. The available intact forest
                                                                                                   pansion of new public roads (e.g. the Pan Borneo Highway)
           is largely confined to Maliau basin, categorized by very steep
                                                                                                   will exacerbate the risk of poaching, as poachers can access re-
           slopes that are impassable to bantengs, and Danum Valley
                                                                                                   mote forest areas by car, motorcycle or foot. Decreasing acces-
           Conservation Area, which was reportedly occupied by ban-
                                                                                                   sibility for poachers is one of Sabah Forestry Department’s
           tengs in  (Gardner et al., ) but was not surveyed in
                                                                                                   aims (Daily Express, ), and should be taken into consid-
           this study. The extent of protected intact forest in  was
                                                                                                   eration in development plans for road construction. Davies &
           only % (Bryan et al., ), which may explain the common
                                                                                                   Payne () and Boonratana () noted that hunting was
           sighting of bantengs in degraded forests.
                                                                                                   one of the main causes of the decline of banteng populations
               Our model indicated that higher precipitation rates
                                                                                                   in Sabah, and our camera-trap stations detected two snare in-
           during the driest months improved habitat suitability, sug-
                                                                                                   juries. Given the banteng’s cryptic nature, capture of indivi-
           gesting bantengs are potentially drought sensitive. Little is
                                                                                                   duals and removal of snares from trapped individuals is
           known about the effect of drought on wildlife in Borneo
                                                                                                   almost impossible, and therefore snare injuries are likely to
           but Hoogerwerf () noted that dry seasons shaped the
                                                                                                   cause fatal infections or physical impairment.
           distribution of the Javan banteng because the foraging
           areas, quality of foraging resources and availability of fresh-
           water diminished, resulting in intensified competition with                             Movement resistance
           other ungulates for these scarce resources. During periods of
           drought these conditions would be exacerbated. The water                                Although the predicted least-cost path linkages are specific
           content in the topsoil governs the survival of regenerating                             to the Bornean banteng and may not be suitable for other

           Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
128         H. Y. Lim et al.

                                                                                                                                                 FIG. 3 Locations of the
                                                                                                                                                 least-cost paths,  km
                                                                                                                                                 cost-weighted corridors (from
                                                                                                                                                 low to high cost-weighted
                                                                                                                                                 distances in km) and the 
                                                                                                                                                 suitable habitats for the
                                                                                                                                                 Bornean banteng, and forest,
                                                                                                                                                 in Sabah. Details of the
                                                                                                                                                 least-cost paths are in
                                                                                                                                                 Supplementary Table .

             species, they reflect movement difficulty for bantengs across                              The combination of camera trapping and spatial model-
             the Sabah landscape (Driezen et al., ). These predicted                             ling provides the most robust method of estimating banteng
             locations are potentially areas with the lowest cost for ban-                           distribution across Sabah, and increased survey coverage, es-
             teng dispersal, and the significance of this could be explored                          pecially in areas where previous surveys failed to detect ban-
             by decision makers.                                                                     tengs. Previous large-scale surveys used community-based
                 The model predicted  linkages between  core habitats.                           surveys, line-transect and sign surveys to estimate banteng
             The relatively high ratio of cost-weighted distance to least-cost                       distribution (Davies & Payne, ; Boonratana, ). As
             path indicates a high level of difficulty for bantengs traversing                       the species generally occurs at low density and avoids
             the terrain. The key factors are severe habitat fragmentation                           human presence, these survey methods are less efficient
             and clearance for oil palm. This was evident in the  km                              than camera trapping (Gardner, ).
             cost-weighted corridors, which contained c. % oil palm.                                  The least-cost path analysis is limited in determining the
             The linkage between core areas  and  (Kulamba and                                    appropriate corridor width (Brodie et al., ), and there-
             Segaliud) is the most difficult for banteng dispersal. Despite                          fore we tested several cost-weighted distance cut-off widths
             the presence of small forest patches along the Kinabatangan                             to evaluate their suitability in the least-cost path model
             River, the area between these two core habitats is dominated                            (Dutta et al., ). As the Bornean banteng is a forest-
             by oil palm and separated by a highway.                                                 dependent species, the  km cost-weighted cut-off width
                 The banteng population in Sabah can be grouped into                                 was selected, because at least % of the corridors were forest.
             south-western, north-eastern, western and central subpopu-
             lations that are geographically isolated. Our analysis sug-
             gests that banteng dispersal among these subpopulations                                 Recommendations
             is probably impossible because of high movement resistance.
                                                                                                     The habitat suitability model suggests that precipitation
                                                                                                     during the driest quarter is an influential predictor of habitat
             Method limitations and strengths                                                        suitability for the banteng, but further information about
                                                                                                     the impact of drought on Bornean mammals is needed, es-
             Because of the generality of the spatial predictors, they                               pecially in light of climate change, to understand the factors
             serve as proxies to describe environmental characteristics                              determining species’ ranges. Maintenance of connectivity in
             that may determine the banteng’s habitat preferences. High-                             the central forest should be a long-term conservation goal,
             resolution and comprehensive spatial data across the Sabah                              as this is the largest patch of suitable banteng habitat in
             landscape are necessary to improve the robustness and                                   Sabah and may contain the largest population of bantengs.
             accuracy of modelling output but the spatial data we used                               This forest patch consists of various forest management
             were the best available.                                                                units, and plans for these will need to consider local banteng

                         Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
Bornean banteng in Sabah, Malaysia                             129

           distribution patterns, forest conditions and hunting                                               E L I T H , J., P H I L L I P S , S.J., H A S T I E , T., D U D Í K , M., C H E E , Y.E. & Y AT E S ,
           pressure. This information could also be incorporated in                                               C.J. () A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists.
                                                                                                                  Diversity and Distributions, , –.
           Sabah’s Bornean Banteng Action Plan. Our surveys indicate
                                                                                                              G A R D N E R , P.C. () The natural history, non-invasive sampling,
           that many forest reserves in Sabah are subject to poaching;                                            activity patterns and population genetic structure of the Bornean
           strict enforcement and regulation should be in place to                                                banteng (Bos javanicus lowi) in Sabah, Malaysia. PhD thesis. Cardiff
           monitor and restrict unauthorized access to these areas.                                               University, Cardiff, UK.
                                                                                                              G A R D N E R , C.P., P U DY AT M O KO , S., B H U M P A K P H A N , N., Y I N D E E , M.,
           Acknowledgements We thank the Sabah Wildlife Department,                                               A M B U , D.L.N. & G O O S S E N S , B. () Banteng (Bos javanicus). In
           Datuk Sam Mannan and the Sabah Forestry Department, and the                                            Ecology, Evolution, and Behaviour of Wild Cattle: Implication for
           Sabah Biodiversity Centre for permission to conduct this research,                                     Conservation (eds M. Melletti & J. Burton), pp. –. Cambridge
           and New Forests Pty Ltd and Malua BioBank for supporting our                                           University Press, Cambridge, UK.
           work. This study was funded by Yayasan Sime Darby, Houston Zoo                                     G A R D N E R , P., H E D G E S , S., P U DY AT M O KO , S., G R AY , T.N.E. &
           (P. Riger), the Mohammed bin Zayed Species Conservation Fund,                                          T I M M I N S , R.J. () Bos javanicus. In The IUCN Red List of
           the Malaysian Palm Oil Council, and Woodland Park Zoo. We also                                         Threatened Species : e.TA. Http://dx.doi.org/.
           thank the U.S. Embassy (Kuala Lumpur) for supporting HYL in his                                        /IUCN.UK.-.RLTS.TA.en [accessed 
           research, and the students, volunteers and local communities who                                       December ].
           assisted in the survey.                                                                            G AV E A U , D.L.A., S LOA N , S., M O L I D E N A , E., Y A E N , H., S H E I L , D.,
                                                                                                                  A B R A M , N.K. et al. () Four decades of forest persistence,
           Author contributions Survey planning: HYL, PCG, BG; fieldwork:                                         clearance and logging on Borneo. PLOS ONE, , e.
           HYL, PCG; development of spatial layers: NKA; data analysis: HYL,                                  H O F F M A N N , M., H I LT O N -T AY LO R , C., A N G U LO , A., B Ö H M , M.,
           NKA; writing: all authors.                                                                             B R O O K S , T.M., B U T C H A R T , S.H.M. et al. () The impact of
                                                                                                                  conservation on the status of the world’s vertebrates. Science,
           Conflicts of interest None.                                                                            , –.
                                                                                                              H O O G E R W E R F , A. () Ugjung Kulon: the Land of the Last Javan
           Ethical standards All authors have abided by the Oryx Code of                                          Rhinoceros, with Local and General Data on the Most Important
           Conduct. Permission for the state-wide survey was obtained from                                        Faunal Species and their Preservation in Indonesia. E.J. Brill, Leiden,
           Sabah Wildlife Department, Sabah Forestry Department and Sabah                                         The Netherlands.
           Biodiversity Centre.                                                                               H U , Y., Z H A N , X., Q I , D. & W E I , F. () Spatial genetic structure and
                                                                                                                  dispersal of giant pandas on a mountain-range scale. Conservation
           References                                                                                             Genetics, , –.
                                                                                                              I S H I G E , T., G A K U H A R I , T., H A N Z AWA , K., K O N O , T., S U N J O T O , I.,
           B E I E R , P., M A J K A , D.R. & S P E N C E R , W.D. () Forks in the road:                      S U KO R , J.R.A. et al. () Complete mitochondrial genomes
               choices in procedures for designing wildland linkages. Conservation                                of the tooth of a poached Bornean banteng (Bos javanicus lowi;
               Biology, , –.                                                                              Cetartiodactyla, Bovidae). Mitochondrial DNA Part A, , –.
           B O O N R AT A N A , R. () A statewide survey to estimate the distribution                     IUCN () The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species.
               and density of the Sumatran rhinoceros, Asian elephant and banteng                                 Http://www.iucnredlist.org [accessed  March ].
               in Sabah, Malaysia. PhD thesis. Mahidol University, Bangkok,                                   J O U R N E A U X , K.L., G A R D N E R , P.C., L I M , H.Y., W E R N , J.G.E. &
               Thailand.                                                                                          G O O S S E N S , B. () Herd demography, sexual segregation and the
           B R O D I E , J.F., G I O R D A N O , A.J., D I C K S O N , B., H E B B L E W H I T E , M.,            effects of forest management on Bornean banteng Bos javanicus lowi
               B E R N A R D , H., M O H D -A Z L A N et al. () Evaluating multispecies                       in Sabah, Malaysian Borneo. Endangered Species Research, , –.
               landscape connectivity in a threatened tropical mammal                                         K O H , L.P. & S O D H I , N.S. () Conserving Southeast Asia’s imperiled
               community. Conservation Biology, , –.                                                      biodiversity: scientific, management, and policy challenges.
           B R Y A N , J.E., S H E A R M A N , P.L., A S N E R , G.P., K N A P P , D.E., A O R O , G. &           Biodiversity and Conservation, , –.
               L O K E S , B. () Extreme differences in forest degradation in                             L I U , C., B E R R Y , P.M., D AW S O N , T.P. & P E A R S O N , R.G. () Selecting
               Borneo: comparing practices in Sarawak, Sabah, and Brunei.                                         thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions.
               PLOS ONE, , e.                                                                               Ecography, , –.
           C I N C O T T A , R.P., W I S N E W S K I , J. & E N G E L M A N , R () Human                  L I U , C., W H I T E , M. & N E W E L L , G. () Selecting thresholds for the
               population in the biodiversity hotspots. Nature, , –.                                     prediction of species occurrence with presence-only data. Journal of
           D A I LY E X P R E S S () Tighter access to forest reserves. Http://www.                           Biogeography, , –.
               dailyexpress.com.my/news.cfm?NewsID= [accessed                                          M A N E L , S., W I L L I A M S , H.C. & O R M E R O D , S.J. () Evaluating
               November ].                                                                                    presence–absence models in ecology: the need to account for
           D AV I E S , G. & P AY N E , J. () A Faunal Survey in Sabah. WWF                                   prevalence. Journal of Applied Ecology, , –.
               Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.                                                              M C R A E , B.H. & K AVA N A G H , D.M. () Linkage Mapper
           D R I E Z E N , K., A D R I A E N S E N , F., R O N D I N I N I , C., D O N C A S T E R , C.P. &       Connectivity Analysis Software. The Nature Conservancy, Seattle,
               M AT T H Y S E N , E. () Evaluating least-cost model predictions with                          USA.
               empirical dispersal data: a case-study using radiotracking data of                             N A Z E R I , M., J U S O F F , K., M A D A N I , N., M A H M U D , A.R., B A H M A N , A.R.
               hedgehogs (Erinaceus europaeus). Ecological Modelling, , –.                               & K U M A R , L. () Predictive modeling and mapping of Malayan
           D U T T A , T., S H A R M A , S., M C R A E , B.H., R O Y , P.S. & D E F R I E S , R. ()           sun bear (Helarctos malayanus) distribution using Maximum
               Connecting the dots: mapping habitat connectivity for tigers in                                    Entropy. PLOS ONE, , e.
               central India. Regional Environmental Change, , –.                                       N E W S A B A H T I M E S () Plantation manager behind one of banteng
           E L I T H , J. & L E AT H W I C K , J. () Species distribution models:                             shootings, says Sabah Forestry Department. Https://www.nst.com.
               ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual                                my/news/nation////plantation-manager-behind-one-
               Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, , –.                                        banteng-shootings-says-sabah-forestry [accessed  November ].

           Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
130         H. Y. Lim et al.

             P AO L I , G.D., C U R R A N , L.M. & Z A K , D.R. () Soil nutrients and                S Y F E R T , M.M., S M I T H , M.J. & C O O M E S , D.A. () The effects of
                 beta diversity in the Bornean Dipterocarpacea: evidence for niche                           sampling bias and model complexity on the predictive performance
                 partitioning by tropical rain forest trees. Journal of Ecology, , –.                of MaxEnt species distribution models. PLOS ONE, , e.
             P H I L L I P S , S.J. & D U D Í K , M. () Modeling of species distributions            T R I S U R AT , Y., K A N C H A N A S A K A , B. & K R E F T , H. () Assessing
                 with MaxEnt: new extensions and a comprehensive evaluation.                                 potential effects of land use and climate change on mammal
                 Ecography, , –.                                                                     distributions in northern Thailand. Wildlife Research, , –.
             P H I L L I P S , S.J., A N D E R S O N , R.P. & S C H A P I R E , R.E. () Maximum      WHCWG (W A S H I N G T O N W I L D L I F E H A B I T AT C O N N E C T I V I T Y
                 entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological                            W O R K I N G G R O U P ) () Washington Connected Landscapes
                 Modelling, , –.                                                                    Project: Statewide Analysis. Washington Departments of Fish and
             P O U L S E N , A.D. () Species richness and density of ground herbs                        Wildlife, and Transportation, Olympia, Washington, USA.
                 within a plot of lowland rainforest in north-west Borneo. Journal of                    W I LT I N G , A., C O R D , A., H E A R N , A.J., H E S S E , D., M O H A M E D , A.,
                 Tropical Ecology, , –.                                                              T R A E H O L D T , C. et al. () Modelling the species distribution of
             P R O S S E R , N.S., G A R D N E R , P.C., S M I T H , J.A., W E R N , J.G.E., A M B U ,       flat-headed cats (Prionailurus planiceps), an Endangered South-East
                 L.N. & G O O S S E N S , B. () Body condition scoring of Bornean                        Asian small felid. PLOS ONE, , e.
                 banteng in logged forests. BMC Zoology, , .                                           W I LT I N G , A., H E A R N , A.J., E AT O N , J., B E L A N T , J.L. & K R A M E R -
             S A B A H F O R E S T R Y D E P A R T M E N T () Fact Sheets of Forest Reserves in          S C H A D T , S. () Predicted distribution of the Bornean ferret
                 Sabah (). Sabah Forestry Department, Sandakan, Malaysia.                                badger Melogale everetti (Mammalia: Carnivora: Mustelidae) on
             S T E V E N S O N -H O LT , C.D., W AT T S , K., B E L L A M Y , C.C., N E V I N , O.T. &       Borneo. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, , –.
                 R A M S E Y , A.D. () Defining landscape resistance values in                       W O I N A R S K I , J.C.Z., F I S H E R , A. & M I L N E , D. () Distribution
                 least-cost connectivity models for the invasive grey squirrel:                              patterns of vertebrates in relation to an extensive rainfall gradient
                 a comparison of approaches using expert-opinion and habitat                                 and variation in soil texture in the tropical savannas of the Northern
                 suitability modelling. PLOS ONE, , e.                                                Territory, Australia. Journal of Tropical Ecology, , –.

                         Oryx, 2021, 55(1), 122–130 © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Fauna & Flora International doi:10.1017/S0030605318001126
Downloaded from https://www.cambridge.org/core. IP address: 82.16.166.249, on 03 Feb 2021 at 14:35:02, subject to the Cambridge Core terms of use, available at
https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605318001126
You can also read