Guidelines for the management of primary biliary cirrhosis
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
bs_bs_banner Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 doi: 10.1111/hepr.12270 Special Report Guidelines for the management of primary biliary cirrhosis The Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan Working Subgroup (English version) for Clinical Practice Guidelines for Primary Biliary Cirrhosis*,** *Working Subgroup (English version) for Clinical Practice Guidelines for Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (in alphabetical order): Atsumasa 1. INTRODUCTION T Komori, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital HE JAPANESE VERSION of the clinical practice Organization Nagasaki Medical Center; Atsushi Tanaka, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University School of Medicine; guidelines for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) was Hajime Takikawa, Department of Medicine, Teikyo University developed in 2012 by the Intractable Hepatobiliary School of Medicine; §Hirohito Tsubouchi, Digestive Disease and Disease Study Group, with the support of the Ministry Life-style Related Disease, Kagoshima University Graduate of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan, for the use of School of Medical and Dental Sciences and Kagoshima City general physicians, gastroenterologists and hepatolo- Hospital; †Hiromi Ishibashi, International University of Health and Welfare/Fukuoka Sanno Hospital and Clinical Research gists who treat patients with PBC. Center, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical In preparation for developing the guidelines, the Center; Hiroto Egawa, Department of Surgery, Institute of study group reviewed recent studies that provided Gastroenterology, Tokyo Women’s Medical University; Junko important evidence or that were published in leading Hirohara, Third Department of Internal Medicine, Kansai journals with a high impact factor, in addition to con- Medical University; Ken Shirabe, Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University; Kenichi Harada, Department of sidering the formal consensus of experts on PBC or Human Pathology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of related subjects. Using the core keywords “primary Medicine; Makoto Nakamuta, Department of Gastroenterology, biliary cirrhosis,” a PubMed search was conducted for National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center; Mikio English-language clinical trials, randomized clinical Zeniya, Department of Gastroenterology, Jikei University trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses that were published Graduate School of Medicine; Minoru Nakamura, Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki from January 1998 to December 2009 and that Medical Center and Department of Hepatology, Nagasaki addressed treatment of PBC and its complications, University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences; Nobuyoshi follow-up, indication of and time of consultation for Fukushima, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital liver transplantation, or time of consultation with Organization Kyushu Medical Center; Shinji Shimoda, Medicine specialists. Medical systems and other culture-specific and Biosystemic Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University; Shotaro Sakisaka, Department of factors in Japan were also taken into account. Members Gastroenterology and Medicine, Fukuoka University Faculty of of the task force exchanged ideas frequently during the Medicine; Toshio Morizane, Japan Council for Quality Health drafting process to try and establish a consensus. The Care; Yasuaki Takeyama, Department of Gastroenterology and final draft was made after collecting comments from Medicine, Fukuoka University Faculty of Medicine; ‡Yasuni the public and all the committee members. The level of Nakanuma, Department of Human Pathology, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine; Yoshiyuki Ueno, evidence (LE; Table 1) and the grade of recommenda- Department of Gastroenterology, Yamagata University Faculty of tion (GR; Table 2) were based on the Medical Informa- Medicine (†Chairperson of the Working Group, ‡Chairperson of tion Network Distribution Service in Japan (MINDS). the PBC Subcommittee, §Chairperson of the Intractable After being modified by recent literatures published Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group). since 2010, the present English version of the guidelines **Correspondence: Hiromi Ishibashi, Fukuoka Sanno Hospital, International University of Health and Welfare, 3-6-45 was developed in order to spread our ideas and Momochihama, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0001, Japan. exchange opinions with physicians who are involved in Email: hiishibashi-gi@umin.ac.jp the management of PBC patients overseas. © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology 71
72 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Table 1 Level of evidence (LE) tion techniques, and have specificity of 98% for the 1a Systematic review/meta-analysis of RCTs disease (Supporting information Memo 1). Approxi- 1b Based on one or more RCTs mately 20–30% of PBC patients are positive for 2a Based on non-randomized control study (prospective anti-nuclear pore proteins, e.g., anti-gp210, and/or anti- study) centromere antibodies. Most patients with PBC have an 2b Based on non-randomized control study (historical elevated serum IgM concentration, although high serum cohort study and retrospective cohort study) IgM is not highly specific or sensitive for diagnosis of 3 Case control study PBC. The total gamma globulin concentration remains 4 Analytical epidemiological study (cross-sectional study) normal until late in the disease when cirrhosis develops. 5 Descriptive study (case report or case series) Histologically, chronic non-suppurative destructive 6 Opinion of expert committee, or an expert, not based on cholangitis (CNSDC) is seen in the intrahepatic small patient data bile ducts at the level of the interlobular and septal bile ducts. Disease progression in PBC results in bile duct loss and liver fibrosis, which develop into biliary cirrho- These clinical practice guidelines should be revised at sis and, in some cases, hepatocellular carcinoma. appropriate intervals to incorporate advances in meth- The differential diagnosis includes autoimmune odology and treatment. hepatitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, drug-induced chronic cholestasis, and paucity of intrahepatic bile ducts, after excluding obstructive jaundice and 2. DIAGNOSIS OF PBC cholestatic diseases of known etiologies. 2.1 Diagnosis of PBC: general principles Recommendations: P BC IS AN autoimmune-mediated, chronic cholestatic liver disease that predominantly affects middle-aged women. The initial symptom is most often 1 Patients with one of the following criteria should be diagnosed with PBC: (1) histologically confirmed CNSDC with laboratory findings compatible with pruritus, though the disease generally progresses insidi- PBC; (2) positivity for AMAs with histological find- ously without symptoms for many years. Jaundice pro- ings compatible with PBC but in the absence of char- gresses without improvement once it becomes overt, acteristic histological findings of CNSDC; and (3) no and portal hypertension occurs at a high rate. histological findings available, but positivity for Clinically, increased levels of serum biliary enzymes AMAs as well as clinical findings and a course indica- [alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and γ-glutamyl transferase tive of typical cholestatic PBC. (GR A) (GGT)] and detection of antimitochondrial antibodies 2 Diagnosis of PBC should be performed using the (AMAs) are characteristic. AMAs are found in 95% of criteria endorsed by the Intractable Hepatobiliary patients with PBC when using the most sensitive detec- Disease Study Group with the support of the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare (2010 version, Table 3). (GR A) Table 2 Grade of recommendation (GR) 3 Differential diagnosis should be performed for a spec- A Strong recommendation, with high level of evidence trum of diseases that manifest chronic cholestatic B Moderate recommendation, with certain level of liver dysfunction or immunological disorder with evidence autoantibodies (Table 4). (GR A) *Supported by an intermediate level of evidence and considered to be clinically useful Table 3 Diagnosis of PBC endorsed by the Intractable *Supported by a high level of evidence but not considered to Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group in Japan (2010 version) be clinically very useful *Evidence level is low, but usefulness has already been With histological findings established in clinical practice 1) Biochemical evidence of cholestasis accompanied by C1 Recommendation to be done, without a high level of histological evidence of CNSDC evidence 2) Presence of AMA accompanied by histologically C2 Recommendation not to be done, without a high level compatible features of PBC, even without CNSDC of evidence Without histological findings D Recommendation not to be done, as evidence indicates 3) Presence of AMA accompanied by clinical features and ineffectiveness or harm course of classical and cholestatic PBC © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 73 Table 4 Differential diagnosis of PBC cells in these patients react with mitochondrial antigen, 1) Cholestatic liver diseases despite being negative for AMA. Special consideration Intrahepatic cholestasis: chronic drug-induced cholestasis for their treatment is not warranted. Primary sclerosing cholangitis IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis PBC–AIH overlap syndrome Adult-onset bile duct paucity Patients with PBC who manifest clinicopathological fea- Obstructive jaundice tures of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) in conjunction 2) Diseases with immunological abnormalities Autoimmune hepatitis with elevated levels of aminotransferases could be Drug-induced liver injury recognized. These cases have also been referred to as 3) Elevation of serum ALP and/or GGT PBC with features of AIH. Prednisolone may effectively Space occupying lesions of the liver reduce aminotransferase levels in such cases. Bone lesions Hyperthyroidism 2.3 Diagnosis of PBC: symptoms, signs, Fatty liver diseases and complications Approximately 70–80% of PBC cases are diagnosed in the early and asymptomatic phase. Although this phase 4 Non-invasive imaging of the liver and biliary trees is likely to persist for years, the clinical and histological should be considered mandatory to exclude diseases progression precipitates several symptoms (symptom- manifesting as obstructive jaundice. (GR A) atic PBC). The symptoms and complications of PBC include cholestasis, liver injury, and comorbid autoim- 2.2 Diagnosis of atypical PBC mune disease(s) (Table 5). Pruritus accompanied by cholestasis is characteristic Pathognomonically-related but atypical PBC cases that of PBC. It may occur initially before overt jaundice. do not fulfill the diagnostic criteria should be handled distinctively and appropriately; treatment strategies for these cases are different from those for typical PBC. Table 5 Symptoms and complications of PBC Early PBC Symptoms AMA may be detectable in the serum of individuals 1) None of the following without symptoms of PBC and with normal liver tests. 2) General fatigue Histopathological changes of PBC with no or mild pro- 3) Cholestasis-associated gression are apparent and this condition is designated • Pruritus (scratching) early PBC. Follow-up without medication is appropriate. • Jaundice 4) Liver injury and cirrhosis-associated • Hematemesis and melena Autoimmune cholangitis, autoimmune • Abdominal fullness cholangiopathy • Consciousness disturbance Patients whose clinical features are compatible with 5) Comorbid autoimmune diseases -associated PBC may be negative for AMA but have a high titer of • Sicca syndrome, etc. antinuclear antibody (ANA) in their serum. In 1987, Complications Brunner and Klinge first described this condition as 1) Cholestasis-associated immunocholangitis, while others have used different • Osteoporosis • Hyperlipidemia terminology, such as autoimmune cholangiopathy, 2) Liver injury and cirrhosis-associated primary autoimmune cholangitis, or autoimmune chol- • Portal hypertension angitis. The current understanding is that this condition • Hepatocellular carcinoma is atypical PBC. • Ascites • Hepatic encephalopathy AMA-negative PBC 3) Comorbid autoimmune diseases -associated Approximately 10% of patients who have biochemical • Sjögren’s syndrome • Rheumatoid arthritis evidence of cholestasis, accompanied by histological • Hashimoto thyroiditis, etc. features of PBC, are negative for AMA. Autoreactive T © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
74 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Prolonged cholestasis results in jaundice, xanthoma Table 6 Histological staging of PBC coupled with lipid abnormalities, and osteoporosis- Stage 1 no progression related bone lesions/fractures. Stage 2 mild progression Persistent fatigue is another common symptom, Stage 3 moderate progression occurring in 20–70% of Caucasian patients, although Stage 4 advanced progression less frequently in Japanese patients. No correlation has been found between fatigue and age, sex, jaundice, liver Parenchymal change function parameters, or histological stage of the disease. PBC patients can experience profound distress associ- In the early stage of PBC, non-specific necroin- ated with fatigue. flammatory changes are found in the parenchyma. Cirrhosis-associated symptoms include esophagoga- Interface hepatitis and chronic cholestatic changes are stric varices. Portal hypertension is more likely to occur also found. During the progression of irreversible bile in PBC than in liver diseases with other etiologies, and duct damage and loss, there are several characteristic can develop even in the non-cirrhotic stage of PBC; findings that reflect cholestasis, including ductular reac- some patients are diagnosed by the presence of tion (proliferating bile ductules), copper deposition esophagogastric variceal bleeding as an initial symptom. (orcein-positive granules), bile plaques, hepatocellular Prevalent comorbid autoimmune diseases include ballooning (cholate stasis), Mallory–Denk bodies, and Sjögren’s syndrome, Hashimoto thyroiditis, and rheu- feathery degeneration. These features are associated with matoid arthritis. aPBC may be masked by the symptoms the progression of biliary fibrosis and biliary cirrhosis. of comorbid autoimmune diseases. Appropriate diagno- Changes similar to small cell dysplasia are also often sis of comorbid autoimmune diseases is important found in zone 1 (periportal area), which is useful for because they may influence the outcome of PBC. the diagnosis of PBC. In addition to these cholestatic changes reflecting bile duct loss, chronic hepatitic changes resembling autoimmune hepatitis, such as 2.4 Diagnosis of PBC: pathological interface and lobular hepatitis, are also found in most examinations PBC cases, and are involved in the progression of PBC is histologically characterized by autoimmune- hepatic fibrosis and cirrhosis. mediated progressive destruction of the intrahepatic small bile ducts, as well as by chronic intrahepatic Histological staging cholestasis, hepatocellular damage, fibrosis, and septal The characteristic histological findings of PBC are het- formation. erogeneously distributed throughout the liver. Thus, in small specimens such as those taken from needle liver Bile duct damage biopsy, sampling errors are likely to be recognized when using the classification systems of Scheuer and Ludwig, PBC is histologically characterized by CNSDC and pro- because these two systems define each stage by a sole gressive bile duct loss, which preferably affects the intra- histological feature (Supporting information Memo 2). hepatic small bile ducts, especially the interlobular bile Therefore the novel staging system of Nakanuma (2009) ducts. Non-caseating epithelioid granuloma formation (Tables 6–8) is recommended for histological staging of is often seen in the portal tracts. Granulomatous chol- PBC, as this system could avoid the sampling errors angitis consisting of CNSDC and periductal granuloma caused by the heterogeneous distribution of histological formation is valuable for pathological diagnosis. features. CNSDC is characterized by marked lymphoplasmacytic accumulation around the damaged bile ducts, and lym- Recommendations: phoid cell infiltration is found in the biliary epithelial 1 The novel system for histological grading and staging layer of CNSDC. Some biliary epithelial cells in CNSDC of PBC proposed by Nakanuma et al. is recom- show eosinophilic apoptotic changes and swelling. mended (LE6, GRC1). Moreover, chronic cholangitis, which does not fulfill the 2.4 Diagnosis of PBC: clinical staging and criteria of CNSDC, is also found. Bile duct loss is seen disease severity during the progression of PBC, and the interlobular bile ducts are mostly lost in the terminal cirrhotic stage. The Clinical staging presence of arteries in the absence of bile ducts is useful PBC is classified into two groups depending on the for identification of bile duct loss or ductopenia. absence or presence of symptoms caused by liver © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 75 Table 7 Histological staging system of PBC (Nakanuma et al.) I. Histological findings and scoring for the determination of stage of PBC A. Scoring of fibrosis Score 0 No portal fibrosis, or fibrosis limited to portal tracts Score 1 Portal fibrosis with periportal fibrosis or incomplete septal fibrosis Score 2 Bridging fibrosis with variable lobular disarray Score 3 Liver cirrhosis with regenerative nodules and extensive fibrosis B. Scoring of bile duct loss Score 0 No bile duct loss Score 1 Bile duct loss in < 1/3 of portal tracts Score 2 Bile duct loss in 1/3 to 2/3 of portal tracts Score 3 Bile duct loss in > 2/3 of portal tracts C. Scoring of deposition of orcein-positive granules Score 0 No deposition of granules Score 1 Deposition of granules in a few periportal hepatocytes in < 1/3 of portal tracts Score 2 Deposition of granules in several periportal hepatocytes in 1/3 to 2/3 of portal tracts Score 3 Deposition of granules in many hepatocytes in > 2/3 of portal tracts II. Staging by sum total of two (A and B) or three (A, B, and C) criteria Stage Sum of scores Two criteria† Three criteria‡ Stage 1 (no progression) 0 0 Stage 2 (mild progression) 1–2 1–3 Stage 3 (moderate progression) 3–4 4–6 Stage 4 (advanced progression) 5–6 7–9 †Two criteria: fibrosis and bile duct loss. ‡Three criteria: fibrosis, bile duct loss and deposition of orcein-positive granules. damage: aPBC and sPBC. aPBC is considered the s2PBC, with serum level 32.0 mg/dL (Table 9). s1PBC non-advanced stage (stage I), while sPBC is considered is considered a non-icteric advanced stage (stage II), the advanced stage. sPBC is further classified as and s2PBC is considered an icteric advanced stage s1PBC, with serum bilirubin level 10 continuous hepatocytes in 1 portal tract or fibrous septa, and mild to moderate lobular hepatitis HA2 (moderate activity) Interface hepatitis affecting > 10 continuous hepatocytes in 32 portal tracts or fibrous septa, and mild to moderate lobular hepatitis HA3 (marked activity) Interface hepatitis affecting > 20 continuous hepatocytes in 3 1/2 of portal tracts, and moderate lobular hepatitis or bridging or zonal necrosis © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
76 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Table 9 Clinical staging of PBC Table 10 Modified Child-Pugh score for evaluating the sever- ity of PBC 1) Asymptomatic PBC (aPBC): Condition absent from symptoms caused by liver damage† Score 1 2 3 2) Symptomatic PBC (sPBC): Condition with symptoms T.Bilirubin (mg/dL) 1–4 4–10 >10 caused by liver damage†. Albumin (g/dL) 3.5< 2.8–3.5
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 77 In the logistic model developed by the Japanese Liver gitis, liver inflammation and liver fibrosis; and (iii) Transplantation Study Group (Ref.VII-1) (Supporting delay in the disease progression until end-stage liver information Memo 5), serum total bilirubin and aspar- disease, death, or liver transplantation. The following tate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase Paris and Barcelona criteria are useful for evaluating the (ALT) ratio are necessary. The probability of death after clinical outcome of UDCA treatment. (i) Paris criteria: 6 months is calculated by means of a logistic regression total bilirubin 21.0 mg/dL, ALP 23 × the upper normal formula, and transplantation is recommended if the limit (UNL), and AST 2 2 × UNL at 1 year after introduc- value exceeds 50%. tion of UDCA. (ii) Barcelona criteria: decrease of ALP Finally, for the MELD (Model for End-Stage Liver 340% at 1 year after introduction of UDCA. Disease) score, the serum creatinine level, total biliru- Liver transplantation is the only therapeutic approach bin, and prothrombin time (PT) are the key factors. The for patients in the advanced stage when medical treat- MELD score is used for the evaluation of end-stage liver ment shows little improvement. Prevention and treat- failure. The score is high if hepatorenal syndrome is ment strategies for comorbid autoimmune diseases, present, and the pre-transplantation value correlates cholestasis, and cirrhosis-related symptoms and compli- well with the likelihood and magnitude of complication cations are required. after liver transplantation. Therefore, it is recommended Although the term cirrhosis is included in the name that transplantation should be performed before com- PBC, most patients (70–80%) with PBC have little clini- plication by hepatorenal syndrome (Supporting infor- cal and histological evidence of liver cirrhosis. Patients mation Memo 6). should be informed accordingly to prevent misunder- The common factor among these different schemes is standing of their prognoses. Currently, patients are serum total bilirubin. A life expectancy of 10 years is likely to be diagnosed at earlier stages and disease pro- predicted for patients with a serum bilirubin level gression is likely to be delayed by UDCA. Therefore, the 6.0 mg/dL. asymptomatic, is equivalent to that in the general popu- Recommendations: lation. No restrictions are necessary in daily life for 1 Total bilirubin, prothrombin (INR), albumin, and patients with aPBC. By contrast, some restrictions in the serum creatinine level, which are essential to cal- daily life and nutritional education are required for culate the MELD score, should be measured when patients with sPBC, depending on symptoms, expected considering liver transplantation. (LE 2b (2a in part), future complications, and disease severity. GR A) 2 Patients with PBC should be referred to transplant 3.2 Prescription hepatologists when serum total bilirubin level is Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) >5 mg/dL. To encourage the patients to prepare for liver transplantation, an earlier and appropriate Extensive clinical trials including randomized clinical explanation of liver transplantation is desirable. (LE trials (RCT) and meta-analyses were carried out for 4, GR B) UDCA after the first report by Poupon et al. After lively debates, it was concluded that UDCA not only improves 3. TREATMENT AND MANAGEMENT OF PBC the serum biochemical values of PBC patients but also prolongs the period to death or liver transplantation. 3.1 Treatment and management of PBC: The clinical guidelines for PBC by the European Asso- general principles ciation for the Study of the Liver (EASL) and the Ameri- A LTHOUGH THERE IS no completely curative treat- ment for PBC, ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is cur- rently considered the first-line treatment for the disease. can Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASD) recommend that UDCA be given at a dose of 13–15 mg/ kg/day, whereas in Japan, it is usually given at 600 mg/ UDCA delays the progression of PBC, although it does day. In clinical trials performed with Japanese PBC not have a significant benefit for PBC at the advanced patients, 600 mg/day UDCA was given to PBC patients stage. for 48–132 weeks and then the results of liver tests were The clinical usefulness of UDCA is evaluated accord- analyzed. Improvement was demonstrated in 81.8% ing to the following factors: (i) improvement of serum (27/33) of cases. Therefore, 600 mg/day is considered biochemical markers, such as ALP, GGT, AST, ALT and as a standard dose, irrespective of body weight. The total bilirubin; (ii) histological improvement of cholan- dose can be increased up to 900 mg/day or decreased © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
78 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 depending on weight and adverse events. Co- Recommendations: administration with bezafibrate is then considered if 1 Administration of bezafibrate (Bezatol®, 400 mg/ 900 mg/day UDCA has little effect. UDCA results in day) may be considered in patients who exhibit a biochemical improvement, but is not likely to act suboptimal response to UDCA. (LE 2a, GR B) against the “core” pathogenesis of PBC; administration is usually maintained throughout life. Prednisolone (PSL) Recommendations: PSL has been considered to be contraindicated for PBC, 1 UDCA should be used to improve liver biochemical because it brings about little improvement of PBC and tests and histological findings, and to prolong the may even cause deterioration of osteoporosis in post- time until death or liver transplantation, though it menopausal women. Co-administration of PSL with does not provide significant benefit for those at the UDCA is indicated for patients with PBC–AIH overlap advanced stage. (LE 1a, GR A) syndrome, especially those whose symptoms of hepati- 2 In general, UDCA should be administered at 600 mg/ tis are clinically and histologically relevant. The recom- day, and increased to 900 mg/day if the response is mended initial corticosteroid dose is
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 79 Table 11 Diagnostic criteria for corticosteroid use in PBC–AIH overlap syndrome (Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group in Japan, 2011) PSL is recommended in addition to UDCA for cases that are considered to be PBC–AIH overlap syndrome and meet the two following criteria simultaneously: (1) diagnosed with PBC using the criteria of the Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group in Japan (2010) (2) diagnosed as probable/definite AIH using International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (IAIHG) simplified criteria (2008). (Supporting information Memo 7) As for liver histology, HA scores in the PBC grading/staging systems in Table 8 should be used as follows: 0 for HA score 0 or 1, 1 point for HA score 2, and 2 points for HA score 3. are followed up every 1–2 years. Development of overt and markedly reduced quality of life (QOL) due to PBC may be preventable in these patients if etiology- severe pruritus. On the other hand, liver transplantation oriented medical treatment becomes available in the is generally contraindicated for patients with severe future. complications, such as lung and kidney disease, other organ disease, infection, and malignancy. Autoimmune cholangitis It should be borne in mind, however, that not every When the response to UDCA is not optimal, PSL admin- patient for whom liver transplantation is indicated suc- istration should be considered. It is advisable to switch ceeds in finding a donated liver. Living donor liver trans- to UDCA monotherapy after hepatitis subsides, as in plantation (LDLT) is more common in Japan because cases of PBC–AIH overlap syndrome. deceased donor livers are scarcely offered for transplan- tation. In order to plan for LDLT, a 1-month period is AMA-negative PBC desirable for the living donor. This period is required for medical examination, preparation for early rehabilita- The diagnosis of PBC should be confirmed by liver his- tion and approval by the appropriate ethical committee. tology. The treatment strategy is identical to that for Earlier registration for deceased donor liver transplanta- AMA-positive PBC. tion (DDLT) is recommended. Given this situation, there is no difference in timing between cases in which PBC–AIH overlap syndrome LDLT is indicated and those in which DDLT is indicated. PSL is recommended in addition to UDCA for cases that Moreover, there is no difference in the outcome of PBC are considered to be PBC–AIH overlap syndrome, patients who undergo LDLT and DDLT. because superimposed AIH could deteriorate the clinical Recommendations: course of PBC toward cirrhosis. 1 When PBC progresses to cholestatic cirrhosis, medical Recommendations: treatment has little effect on further disease progres- 1 When patients with PBC are diagnosed with PBC– sion and liver transplantation is the only therapeutic AIH overlap syndrome due to clinical and histologi- approach for survival. (LE 1, GR B) Appropriate cal features of AIH, and meet the criteria for timing of liver transplantation is the most important corticosteroid use for PBC–AIH overlap syndrome consideration. (LE 2b, GR B) (Table 11), PSL administration is strongly recom- 2 The following criteria (Table 12) should be consulted mended. (LE 2b, GR B) to determine whether liver transplantation is indi- 2 It is advised that treatment should be switched to cated. (LE 6, GR A) UDCA monotherapy when hepatitis features subside. (LE 3, GR C1) Indication for liver transplantation 3.4 Liver transplantation As described in the Prognosis portion of section 2.5, three scoring systems have been widely implemented for General principles predicting prognosis in PBC. The most popular system is Liver transplantation is considered in cases with con- the updated Natural History Model for PBC from the tinuous elevation of total bilirubin, intractable pleural Mayo Clinic. Once the Mayo risk score is >7.8, the effusion and/or ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, outcome after liver transplantation is poor. Further- repeated rupture of esophageal and/or gastric varices, more, this score was a significant predictor for liver- © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
80 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Table 12 Criterion for the indication of liver transplantation Table 14 Recommendation for consultation to specialists 1) Both of the following items (I) and (II) should be met. 1) Decision of initial treatment approach, in particular, I. Sum of Child–Pugh score 38. diagnosis and evaluation of atypical cases II. Serum levels of total bilirubin 35.0 mg/dL, with at 2) Decision of treatment strategy least one complication depicted below (a–g). 3) Suboptimal response of UDCA a) Hepatic coma 4) Apparent progression to symptomatic PBC b) Gastrointestinal bleeding with portal hypertension 5) 35 mg/dL of total bilirubin (consult to liver transplant c) Refractory ascites and/or pleural effusion surgeons; earlier explanation is necessary for patients) d) Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, hepatorenal syndrome, hepatopulmonary syndrome e) Hepatocellular carcinoma f) Itch sensation, causing insomnia g) Severe general malaise, and deterioration of QOL, undergone liver transplantation, and thus the timing of by severe osteomalacia consultation may be adequate when the MELD score reaches 12. Recommendations: 1 The use of scores for the evaluation of liver failure is related death before liver transplantation, but not for mandatory. post-transplantation prognosis. Thus, liver transplanta- a Updated Natural History Model for PBC from the tion should be performed before the Mayo risk score Mayo Clinic: risk score >7.8 (LE 2b, GR B) reaches 7.8. b Mortality rate after 6 months: 3 50%, as estimated Secondly, the indication model of the Japanese Liver by the Japan liver transplantation indication Transplantation Indication Study Group recommends society model (LE 2b, GR, B) liver transplantation when the mortality rate after 6 c MELD score 315 (LE 2b, GR, B) months is >50%, as estimated by a logistic model. In this model, the severity of disease is estimated as a score of 1, 3, 6, 8 or 10 points. At present, patients with scores Management of patients after liver transplantation >6 points, which means the expected mortality rate after Liver-transplanted patients should be administered 6 months is >70%, are candidates for DDLT. In contrast, immunosuppressive agents and closely monitored. patients in whom the expected mortality rate after 6 Postoperative complications, acute/chronic rejection, months is >50% are candidates for LDLT. recurrence of PBC, and infections should all be carefully Finally, the cumulative survival rate at 1 year after monitored. Postoperative recurrence of PBC is an liver transplantation is about 50% in patients whose important cause of graft dysfunction. The five-year recur- MELD score is >20. The higher the MELD score, the rence rate after liver transplantation is reported as poorer is the outcome after liver transplantation. In a 0–33% in representative facilities in Japan. The ten-year previous report from a single center in Japan, the survival rate of patients with PBC after liver transplan- outcome became poorer when the MELD score was >25. tation is equal to the survival in those with other The average MELD score is −15 in patients who have diseases. Table 13 Clinical tests for follow-up of patients with PBC 1) Assessment of activity and progression of PBC 1 Liver tests (albumin, total bilirubin, AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, PT) every 3–6 months† 2) Assessment of complications 2 Thyroid function (TSH, free T4) Every 1 year† 3 Bone mineral density testing Every 2–4 years† 4 Upper GI endoscopy Every 1–2 years† 5 Abdominal ultrasound and serum AFP Every 1 year† (every 3–6 months in liver cirrhosis)† †Intervals of tests vary depending on the stage of the patient. © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 81 3.5 Management of symptoms cise are recommended, and medical treatment should be and complications given if necessary. Bisphosphonates, bioactive vitamin D3 agents, and vitamin K2 are prescribed. Dermal pruritus Among bisphosphonates, alendronate improves bone Pruritus is the most specific symptom in PBC, and may density more than etidronate. Nevertheless, there is no appear even before development of jaundice. Although evidence that alendronate suppresses bone fracture. it has been debated whether increased concentrations Administration once weekly is preferable to daily of bile salts, histamine, progesterone metabolites or administration. Alendronate is contraindicated for endogenous opioids are potential pruritogens in cases with esophageal stenosis due to sclerotherapy for cholestasis, recent experimental evidence has impli- esophageal varices. cated the lysophospholipase, autotaxin (ATX), and its Vitamin D3 and vitamin K2 formulations have fre- product, lysophosphatidic acid (LPA), as potential quently been prescribed for PBC in Japan. Both drugs mediators of cholestatic pruritis. Pruritus is more often have been proven to be effective for osteoporosis itself, exacerbated at night more than in the daytime, and may and are regarded as Grade B in guidelines for the pre- decrease along with progression of liver damage. vention and treatment of osteoporosis. Cholestyramine is a non-absorbable basic anion- Recommendations: exchange resin, and is a drug of first choice for pruritus 1 It is desirable to start treatment for the prevention of in PBC. It improves pruritus by inducing adsorption of fractures in cases with a T score below −1.5. (LE 4, GR bile acids in the intestinal tract. In patients treated with C1) UDCA, an interval of a few hours is necessary in order to 2 Alendronate improves bone density in PBC patients. avoid the attenuating effect caused by binding of cho- (LE 1b, GR A) lestyramine and UDCA. Cholestimide, which is also a 3 Although there is scarce evidence in PBC patients, basic anion-exchange resin, is used empirically in Japan. vitamin D3 and vitamin K2 formulations can be Antihistamines are also frequently prescribed in Japan effective for osteoporosis. (LE 1b, GR C1) due to their ease of use. They can be effective for insom- nia due to their sedative action. Dyslipidemia The efficacy of rifampicin, which is an anti- Hypercholesterolemia is likely to develop in PBC due to tuberculosis agent, for pruritus has been validated in cholestasis. Xanthoma is seen around the eyelids. No two meta-analyses. As there is a possibility of various specific treatment for hypercholesterolemia in PBC is side effects, including liver damage, close and regular required in most cases, while bezafibrate is expected to follow-up are necessary. A dose of 150–300 mg twice be effective for both PBC and hypercholesterolemia. daily is used for pruritis. Recommendations: Sicca syndrome 1 Cholestyramine is effective against dermal pruritus in Sicca syndrome, a major symptom of Sjögren’s syn- PBC patients, and should be considered the first drome, is frequently complicated with PBC. The choice agent. (LE 2a, A) diagnosis of Sjögren’s syndrome should be made by 2 Antihistamines might be effective against severe detection of serum anti-SS-A/SS-B antibodies, presence dermal pruritus which may cause insomnia. (LE 5, of corneal erosion, and lip biopsy if necessary. Artificial GR C1) lachrymal fluids are indicated for eye symptoms. If the 3 Rifampicin is effective against dermal pruritus in PBC response is not favorable, pilocarpine hydrochloride patients. (LE 1a, GR B) and cevimeline hydrochloride hydrate are used under the guidance of ophthalmologists. As for oral symp- Osteoporosis toms, artificial saliva should be used first, and pilocar- Osteoporosis is frequently observed in patients with PBC pine hydrochloride and cevimeline hydrochloride because intestinal absorption of fat-soluble vitamins hydrate can also be prescribed. is disturbed due to reduced secretion of bile acids, and Recommendations: PBC is common in middle-aged and postmenopausal 1 Cevimeline hydrochloride and pilocarpine hydro- women. For prevention of osteoporosis, abundant oral chloride may be effective for xerostomia in PBC, intake of calcium (1 to 1.2 g/day) and vitamin D (plen- although there are no studies evaluating their tiful in fish and mushrooms) and weight-bearing exer- potential to alleviate the symptoms occurring in PBC © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
82 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 patients with concurrent Sjögren’s syndrome. (LE 6, to shorten the second trimester of pregnancy, if GR B) possible. 2 Patients with PBC frequently experience cholestasis, Recommendations: comorbid autoimmune diseases, and symptoms asso- 1 The blood and other clinical tests should be under- ciated with liver injury and cirrhosis. Prevention and taken regularly to investigate complicating comorbi- management of these symptoms are required. (GR A) dities, prevent complications, and detect portal hypertension and liver cancer as early as possible. 3.6 Follow-up (Table 13) (LE 3, GR B) Prognosis of asymptomatic PBC is excellent with little 2 It is advisable to consult with hepatologists when the progression, but 25% of patients with aPBC develop diagnosis of PBC is made, or when patients with PBC some symptoms within 10 years. Serum total bilirubin become symptomatic. In patients with atypical forms and cholestatic enzymes (ALP, GGT) are important for of PBC such as PBC–AIH overlapping syndrome, assessing the activity and progression of PBC. Liver earlier referral is recommended. (Table 14) (LE 6, GR biochemical tests should be done every 3–6 months. A-B) In addition, thyroid hormone (every year) and bone 3 For patients in the symptomatic stage, there is a like- mineral density (every 2–4 years) tests are recom- lihood of worsening of pruritus or icterus in the preg- mended because PBC is likely to be complicated with nancy, as well as an increased possibility of variceal other autoimmune diseases, such as Sjögren’s syn- rupture. It is advisable that these patients undergo drome, chronic thyroiditis, and rheumatoid arthritis. upper gastrointestinal endoscopy by the second tri- Regular upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, depending mester of pregnancy. (LE 5, GR C1) on stage (1 or 2 times per year), is required because 4 Administration of UDCA or bezafibrate should be esophageal/gastric varices may develop even in patients withheld, if the patient with PBC is possibly pregnant without jaundice. Abdominal ultrasound (US) and or in the early stage of pregnancy. In the third trimes- serum AFP testing every 6–12 months are necessary in ter of pregnancy, administration of UDCA is possible patients with definite or suspected liver cirrhosis. Liver for cholestasis if necessary. (LE 5, GR C1) cirrhosis, older age, and male sex are high risk factors for developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, ACKNOWLEDGMENTS testing for tumor markers and imaging studies [US and computed tomography (CT)] are required for early detection of HCC in patients with advanced PBC. Man- agement for other complicating autoimmune diseases T HIS STUDY WAS supported by Grants-in-Aid from the Research Program of lntractable Disease pro- vided by the Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare of should be done depending on each symptom. Japan. Finally, special attention should be paid to pregnancy in PBC and patients who have a desire to bear children. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST The chance for pregnancy could be the same in the early stage of aPBC as in the normal population; there is no evidence to recommend avoidance of pregnancy in S HOTARO SAKISAKA IS given research funds from MSD K.K., Mikio Zeniya is given research funds from Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd. and Chugai Pharmaceutical patients with aPBC. In sPBC, however, if worsening of icterus or varices is reported, then avoidance of preg- Co., Ltd., Hirohito Tsubouchi is given research funds nancy could be justified. from Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., MSD K.K. and The impact of pregnancy on PBC is unclear because KAN Research Institute, Inc. All other authors have no both exacerbation and improvement of cholestasis conflicts of interest to declare. have been reported. Estrogen could potentially worsen cholestasis; pruritus may become severe in pregnancy REFERENCES and could be prolonged even after delivery. Conversely, I General guidelines for PBC it should be noted that cholestasis could be symptom- atic after pregnancy. After a patient has become preg- 1 Publications from the Study Group supported nant, monitoring for varices is necessary as in other by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare cirrhotic patients, especially after the second trimester, of Japan due to increase in circulating blood volume. The use of 1 Toda G, Onishi S. Diagnostic criteria of primary biliary β blockers is considered to be safe. It is also advisable cirrhosis (2004). Kanzo 2005; 46: 233. © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 83 2 The Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group sup- phosphatase: is this primary biliary cirrhosis? Hepatology ported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare 1986; 6: 1279–84. of Japan. Clinical guideline of primary biliary cirrhosis 14 Metcalf JV, Mitchison HC, Palmer JM et al. Natural history (PBC), 2012. Kanzo 2012; 53: 633–86. of early primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet 1996; 348: 1399– Homepage of Japan Intractable Diseases Information 402. Center. Available at: http://www.nanbyou.or.jp/. Accessed November 19, 2013. 3 Autoimmune cholangitis, autoimmune Homepage of Medical Information Network Distribution cholangiopathy: AIC Service (Minds), financially supported by Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan as a consignment 15 Brunner G, Klinge O. A chronic destructive non- project. Available at: http://minds.jcqhc.or.jp/n/topics suppurative cholangitis-like disease picture with anti- .php. Accessed November 19, 2013. nuclear antibodies (immunocholangitis). Dtsch Med 3 The Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease Study Group sup- Wochenschr 1987; 112: 1454–8. ported by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of 16 Ben-Ari Z, Dhillon AP, Sherlock S. Autoimmune Japan. Clinical Guide of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis (PBC). cholangiopathy: part of the spectrum of autoimmune Tokyo: Bunkodo, 2010. chronic active hepatitis. Hepatology 1993; 18: 10–5. 4 Nakanuma Y, Ishibashi H, Takikawa H et al. Proposal 17 Taylor SL, Dean PJ, Riely CA. Primary autoimmune chol- of novel staging and grading system of primary biliary angitis. An alternative to antimitochondrial antibody- cirrhosis. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi 2011; 108: negative primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J Surg Pathol 1994; 1817–22. 18: 91–9. 5 Annual reports of the Intractable Hepatobiliary Disease 18 Michieletti P, Wanless IR, Katz A et al. Antimitochondrial Study Group supported by the Ministry of Health, Labour antibody negative primary biliary cirrhosis: a distinct and Welfare of Japan. syndrome of autoimmune cholangitis. Gut 1994; 35: 260–5. 2 Overseas guidelines 6 Heathcote EJ. Management of primary biliary cirrhosis. 4 Overlap syndrome The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases 19 Klöppel G, Seifert G, Lindner H et al. Histopathological practice guidelines. Hepatology 2000; 31: 1005–13. features in mixed types of chronic aggressive hepatitis and 7 Lindor KD, Gershwin ME, Poupon R et al. American Asso- primary biliary cirrhosis. Correlations of liver histology ciation for Study of Liver Diseases. Primary biliary cirrho- with mitochondrial antibodies of different specificity. sis. Hepatology 2009; 50: 291–308. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol 1977; 373: 143–60. 8 European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL 20 Chazouillères O, Wendum D, Serfaty L et al. Primary Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic biliary cirrhosis–autoimmune hepatitis overlap syn- liver diseases. J Hepatol 2009; 51: 237–67. drome: clinical features and response to therapy. Hepatology 1998; 28: 296–301. 3 Representative reviews 21 Czaja AJ. Frequency and nature of the variant syndromes of autoimmune liver disease. Hepatology 1998; 28: 360–5. 9 Kaplan MM, Gershwin ME. Primary biliary cirrhosis. N 22 Lohse AW, zum Buschenfelde KH, Franz B et al. Charac- Engl J Med 2005; 353: 1261–73. Erratum in: N Engl J Med terization of the overlap syndrome of primary biliary cir- 2006; 354: 313. rhosis (PBC) and autoimmune hepatitis: evidence for it 10 Poupon R. Primary biliary cirrhosis: a 2010 update. being a hepatitic form of PBC in genetically susceptible J Hepatol 2010; 52: 745–58. individuals. Hepatology 1999; 29: 1078–84. 23 Hennes EM, Zeniya M, Czaja AJ et al. International Auto- II Disease concept immune Hepatitis Group. Simplified criteria for the diag- 1 PBC nosis of autoimmune hepatitis. Hepatology 2008; 48: 169–76. 11 Ahrens EH Jr, Payne MA, Kunkel HG et al. Primary biliary 24 Neuhauser M, Bjornsson E, Treeprasertsuk S et al. Auto- cirrhosis. Medicine (Baltimore) 1950; 29: 299–364. immune hepatitis-PBC overlap syndrome: a simplified 12 Rubin E, Schaffner F, Popper H. Primary biliary cirrhosis. scoring system may assist in the diagnosis. Am J Chronic non-suppurative destructive cholangitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 345–53. Pathol 1965; 46: 387–407. 25 Tanaka A, Harada K, Ebinuma H et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis – autoimmune hepatitis overlap syndrome: a 2 Early PBC rationale for corticosteroids use based on a nation-wide 13 Mitchison HC, Bassendine MF, Hendrick A et al. Posi- retrospective study in Japan, submitted. Hepatol Res 2011; tive antimitochondrial antibody but normal alkaline 41: 877–86. © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
84 H. Ishibashi et al. Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 III Pathophysiology primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2003; 124: 1915–25. 1 Mechanism of onset and tissue damage 38 Kikuchi K, Lian ZX, Yang GX et al. Bacterial CpG induces 26 Van de Water J, Turchany J, Leung PS et al. Molecular hyper-IgM production in CD27(+) memory B cells in mimicry in primary biliary cirrhosis. Evidence for biliary primary biliary cirrhosis. Gastroenterology 2005; 128: 304– epithelial expression of a molecule cross-reactive with 12. pyruvate dehydrogenase complex-E2. J Clin Invest 1993; 39 Mao TK, Lian ZX, Selmi C et al. Altered monocyte 91: 2653–64. responses to defined TLR ligands in patients with primary 27 Tsuneyama K, Van De Water J, Van Thiel D et al. Abnor- biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2005; 42: 802–8. mal expression of PDC-E2 on the apical surface of biliary 40 Takii Y, Nakamura M, Ito M et al. Enhanced expression of epithelial cells in patients with antimitochondrial type I interferon and toll-like receptor-3 in primary biliary antibody-negative primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology cirrhosis. Lab Invest 2005; 85: 908–20. 1995; 22: 1440–6. 41 Sasaki M, Ikeda H, Yamaguchi J et al. Telomere shortening 28 Shimoda S, Nakamura M, Ishibashi H et al. HLA DRB4 in the damaged small bile ducts in primary biliary cirrho- 0101-restricted immunodominant T cell autoepitope sis reflects ongoing cellular senescence. Hepatology 2008; of pyruvate dehydrogenase complex in primary biliary 48: 186–95. cirrhosis: evidence of molecular mimicry in human 42 Shimoda S, Miyakawa H, Nakamura M et al. CD4 T-cell autoimmune diseases. J Exp Med 1995; 181: 1835– autoreactivity to the mitochondrial autoantigen PDC-E2 45. in AMA-negative primary biliary cirrhosis. J Autoimmun 29 Koga H, Sakisaka S, Ohishi M et al. Nuclear DNA frag- 2008; 31: 110–5. mentation and expression of Bcl-2 in primary biliary 43 Lleo A, Selmi C, Invernizzi P et al. The consequences of cirrhosis. Hepatology 1997; 25: 1077–84. apoptosis in autoimmunity. J Autoimmun 2008; 31: 257– 30 Harada K, Ozaki S, Gershwin ME et al. Enhanced apop- 62. tosis relates to bile duct loss in primary biliary cirrhosis. 44 Lleo A, Selmi C, Invernizzi P et al. Apotopes and the Hepatology 1997; 26: 1399–405. biliary specificity of primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 31 Shigematsu H, Shimoda S, Nakamura M et al. Fine 2009; 49: 871–9. specificity of T cells reactive to human PDC-E2 163-176 45 Shimoda S, Harada K, Niiro H et al. CX3CL1 (fractalkine): peptide, the immunodominant autoantigen in primary a signpost for biliary inflammation in primary biliary biliary cirrhosis: implications for molecular mimicry and cirrhosis. Hepatology 2010; 51: 567–75. cross-recognition among mitochondrial autoantigens. Hepatology 2000; 32: 901–9. 2 Genetic and environmental factors 32 Harada K, Tsuneyama K, Sudo Y et al. Molecular identifi- cation of bacterial 16S ribosomal RNA gene in liver tissue 46 Tsuji K, Watanabe Y, Van De Water J et al. Familial of primary biliary cirrhosis: is Propionibacterium acnes primary biliary cirrhosis in Hiroshima. J Autoimmun involved in granuloma formation? Hepatology 2001; 33: 1999; 13: 171–8. 530–6. 47 Tanaka A, Borchers AT, Ishibashi H et al. Genetic and 33 Sakisaka S, Kawaguchi T, Taniguchi E et al. Alterations in familial considerations of primary biliary cirrhosis. Am J tight junctions differ between primary biliary cirrhosis Gastroenterol 2001; 96: 8–15. and primary sclerosing cholangitis. Hepatology 2001; 33: 48 Leung PS, Quan C, Park O et al. Immunization with a 1460–8. xenobiotic 6-bromohexanoate bovine serum albumin 34 Kita H, Lian Z-X, Van de Water J et al. Identification of conjugate induces antimitochondrial antibodies. J HLA-A2–restricted CD8+ Cytotoxic T Cell Responses in Immunol 2003; 170: 5326–32. Primary Biliary Cirrhosis. T cell activation is augmented 49 Selmi C, Balkwill DL, Invernizzi P et al. Patients with by immune complexes cross-presented by dendritic cells. primary biliary cirrhosis react against a ubiquitous J Exp Med 2002; 195: 113–23. xenobiotic-metabolizing bacterium. Hepatology 2003; 38: 35 Matsumura S, Kita H, He XS et al. Comprehensive 1250–7. mapping of HLA-A0201-restricted CD8 T-cell epitopes on 50 Abdulkarim AS, Petrovic LM, Kim WR et al. Primary PDC-E2 in primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatology 2002; 36: biliary cirrhosis: an infectious disease caused by Chla- 1125–34. mydia pneumoniae? J Hepatol 2004; 40: 380–4. 36 Selmi C, Balkwill DL, Invernizzi P et al. Patients with 51 Sood S, Gow PJ, Christie JM et al. Epidemiology of primary biliary cirrhosis react against a ubiquitous primary biliary cirrhosis in Victoria, Australia: high preva- xenobiotic-metabolizing bacterium. Hepatology 2003; 38: lence in migrant populations. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: 1250–7. 470–5. 37 Shimoda S, Nakamura M, Ishibashi H et al. Molecular 52 Selmi C, Mayo MJ, Bach N et al. Primary biliary mimicry of mitochondrial and nuclear autoantigens in cirrhosis in monozygotic and dizygotic twins: genetics, © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
Hepatology Research 2014; 44 (Suppl. 1): 71–90 Guidelines for PBC 85 epigenetics, and environment. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: and pathogenetically models human primary biliary cir- 485–92. rhosis. J Exp Med 2006; 203: 1209–19. 53 Invernizzi P, Miozzo M, Battezzati PM et al. Frequency of 69 Oertelt S, Lian ZX, Cheng CM et al. Anti-mitochondrial monosomy X in women with primary biliary cirrhosis. antibodies and primary biliary cirrhosis in TGF-beta Lancet 2004; 363: 533–5. receptor II dominant-negative mice. J Immunol 2006; 177: 54 Selmi C, Invernizzi P, Zuin M et al. Genetics and 1655–60. geoepidemiology of primary biliary cirrhosis: following the footprints to disease etiology. Semin Liver Dis 2005; 4 Anti-mitochondrial antibody, anti-gp210antibody 25: 265–80. 70 Gershwin ME, Rowley M, Davis PA et al. Molecular 55 Gershwin ME, Selmi C, Worman HJ et al. Risk factors and biology of the 2-oxo-acid dehydrogenase complexes and comorbidities in primary biliary cirrhosis: a controlled anti-mitochondrial antibodies. Prog Liver Dis 1992; 10: interview-based study of 1032 patients. Hepatology 2005; 47–61. 42: 1194–202. 71 Nishio A, Coppel R, Ishibashi H et al. The pyruvate dehy- 56 Ala A, Stanca CM, Bu-Ghanim M et al. Increased preva- drogenase complex as a target autoantigen in primary lence of primary biliary cirrhosis near superfund toxic biliary cirrhosis. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol waste sites. Hepatology 2006; 43: 525–31. 2000; 14: 535–47. 57 Zein CO, Beatty K, Post AB et al. Smoking and increased 72 Worman HJ. Nuclear envelope protein autoantigens in severity of hepatic fibrosis in primary biliary cirrhosis: a primary biliary cirrhosis. Hepatol Res 2007; 37 (Suppl 3): cross validated retrospective assessment. Hepatology 2006; S406–11. 44: 1564–71. 58 Leung PS, Park O, Tsuneyama K et al. Induction of primary biliary cirrhosis in guinea pigs following chemical IV Clinical course and prediction xenobiotic immunization. J Immunol 2007; 179: 2651–7. of prognosis 59 Poupon R, Ping C, Chretien Y et al. Genetic factors of 1 Clinical course susceptibility and of severity in primary biliary cirrhosis. 73 Mitchison HC, Bassendine MF, Hendrick A et al. Positive J Hepatol 2008; 49: 1038–45. antimitochondrial antibody but normal alkaline phos- 60 McNally RJ, Ducker S, James OF. Are transient environ- phatase: is this primary biliary cirrhosis? Hepatology 1986; mental agents involved in the cause of primary biliary 6: 1279–84. cirrhosis? Evidence from space-time clustering analysis. 74 Mahl TC, Shockcor W, Boyer JL. Primary biliary cirrhosis: Hepatology 2009; 50: 1169–74. survival of a large cohort of symptomatic and asymptom- 61 Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Xu C et al. Primary biliary cirrhosis atic patients followed for 24 years. J Hepatol 1994; 20: associated with HLA, IL12A, and IL12RB2 variants. N Engl 707–13. J Med 2009; 360: 2544–55. 75 Metcalf JV, Mitchison HC, Palmer JM et al. Natural history 62 Hirschfield GM, Liu X, Han Y et al. Variants at IRF5- of early primary biliary cirrhosis. Lancet 1996; 348: 1399– TNPO3, 17q12-21 and MMEL1 are associated with 402. primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 655–7. 76 Mattalia A, Quaranta S, Leung PS et al. Characterization 63 Liu X, Invernizzi P, Lu Y et al. Genome-wide meta- of antimitochondrial antibodies in health adults. analyses identify three loci associated with primary biliary Hepatology 1998; 27: 656–61. cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2010; 42: 658–60. 77 Springer J, Cauch-Dudek K, O’Rourke K et al. Asymptom- 64 Juran BD, Lazaridis KN. Update on the genetics and atic primary biliary cirrhosis: a study of its natural history genomics of PBC. J Autoimmun 2010; 35: 181–7. and prognosis. Am J Gastroenterol 1999; 94: 47–53. 65 Mells GF, Floyd JAB, Morley KI et al. Genome-wide 78 Nakano T, Inoue K, Hirohara J et al. Long-term prognosis association study identifies 12 new susceptibility loci of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) in Japan and analysis of for primary biliary cirrhosis. Nat Genet 2011; 43: 329– the factors of stage progression in asymptomatic PBC 32. (a-PBC). Hepatol Res 2002; 22: 250–60. 66 Selmi C, Torok NJ, Affronti A et al. Genomic variants 79 Prince M, Chetwynd A, Newman W et al. Survival and associated with primary biliary cirrhosis. Genome Med symptom progression in a geographically based cohort of 2010; 2: 5. patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: follow-up for up to 28 years. Gastroenterology 2002; 123: 1044–51. 3 Animal models 80 Takeshita E, Kumagi T, Matsui H et al. Esophagogastric 67 Wakabayashi K, Lian ZX, Moritoki Y et al. IL-2 receptor varices as a prognostic factor for the determination of alpha(-/-) mice and the development of primary biliary clinical stage in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis. cirrhosis. Hepatology 2006; 44: 1240–9. J Gastroenterol 2003; 38: 1060–5. 68 Irie J, Wu Y, Wicker LS et al. NOD.c3c4 congenic mice 81 Lee YM, Kaplan MM. The natural history of PBC: has it develop autoimmune biliary disease that serologically changed? Semin Liver Dis 2005; 25: 321–6. © 2014 The Japan Society of Hepatology
You can also read