ESPEN Congress Leipzig 2013 - A life inside: probiotics in practice Functional bowel disorders: less drugs, more bugs? P. Ducrotte (FR)
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
ESPEN Congress Leipzig 2013 A life inside: probiotics in practice Functional bowel disorders: less drugs, more bugs? P. Ducrotte (FR)
UMR 1073 Functional bowel disorders : Functional bowel less drugs, disorders more bugs : less drugs, more bugs Philippe DUCROTTE Philippe DUCROTTE Rouen University Hospital Rouen University Hospital (France) (France) ESPENESPEN Leipzig 30/08/2013 Leipzig 31/08/2013p
Disclosures • Almirall • Bayer Santé • Cephalon • Given Imaging • Mayoly-Spindler • Rosell-Lallemand
Functional bowel disorders Functional Functional Constipation Bloating Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) Functional Functional Diarrhoea Abdominal Pain Drossman DA et al Gastroenterology 2006;130:1377-90
Irritable bowel syndrome Recurrent abdominal pain (or discomfort) • > 3 days per month during the last 3 months • improved by defaecation Alteration in bowel habits • Diarrhoea and/or constipation • Change in stool frequency and/or stool form during pain exacerbation Duration of symptoms > 6 months Drossman DA et al Gastroenterology 2006;130:1377-90
Irritable Bowel Syndrome Common disabling disorder (prevalence : 8-10%) Major impact on patient’s quality of life Unmet needs with standard therapeutic options (antispasmodics, bulking agents, antidepressants...).
Questions • What is the rationale to discuss the use of probiotics for the relief of symptoms in IBS ? • What are the demonstrated effects of probiotics ? • What is the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in IBS ?
Pathophysiology of IBS : a multifactorial disease Central Mechanisms Peripheral Mechanisms Dysmotility Altered permeability Abnormal metabolism of bile acids Hypersensivity Low grade with sensitization of inflammation sensory endings
Pathophysiology of IBS : a multifactorial disease Peripheral Mechanisms Dysmotility Altered permeability MICROBIOTA Abnormal metabolism of bile acids Hypersensivity Low grade with sensitization of inflammation sensory endings
IBS can be a post-infectious IBS 15 - 20 % PI-IBS Non PI-IBS OR : 5.86 (IC 95 % : 3.6-9.4) • Mainly IBS-D • Higher risk when infection documented Thabane M et al. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 26 : 535-44
Risk factors of post-infectious IBS after acute gastroenteritis Spiller R et al Gastroenterology 2009;136:1979-88
Hypersensitivity can be transferred through fecal microbiota « germ-free» rats Microbiota Normosensitive from normosensitive rats healthy controls « germ-free» rats Crouzet L et al Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;25:272-82
Hypersensitivity can be transferred through fecal microbiota « germ-free» rats Microbiota Normosensitive from normosensitive rats healthy controls « germ-free» rats Microbiota from hypersensitive Hypersensitive IBS patients rats Colonic compliance, permeability, mast cells : NS Crouzet L et al Neurogastroenterol Motil 2013;25:272-82
Qualitative differences in faecal microbiota between IBS patients and controls Jeffery IB et al Gut 2012;61:997-1006 Simren M et al Gut 2012;62:159-176
Qualitative differences in faecal microbiota between IBS patients and controls Less diversity Less lactobacilli Jeffery IB et al Gut 2012;61:997-1006 Less bifidobacteriae Simren M et al Gut 2012;62:159-176
Cross-talk Microbiota-Enteric nervous system SCFAs 1 2,3 1.Soret R et al Gastroenterology 2010 2.Jimenez M Neurogastroenterol 2010 3.Krueger D et al Neurogastroenterol 2010
Main end-products of in vitro starch fermentation by faecal microbiota in C-IBS patients and healthy controls HC C-IBS p Sulfides (µg/mL) 498 + 160 1150 + 120 < 0.0001 Hydrogen (µmol/mL) 0.3 + 0.3 1.4 + 0.6 0.008 Methane (µmol/mL) 5.5 0.8 + 0.8 NS (n=2) (n=3) Total SCFA (mM) 71.4 + 12.1 60.7 + 12.8 NS Acetate (mM) 46.1 + 6.5 41.4 + 9.8 NS Propionate (mM) 13.1 + 4.4 9.7 + 2.1 NS Butyrate (mM) 12.3 + 1.7 9.6 + 1.9 0.03 Lactate (mM) 1.1 + 0.5 1.2 + 0.7 NS Chassard C et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2012;1-11
Actual working hypothesis Dysbiosis Activation of Dysregulation of Activation of immune enteric nervous nociceptive response system sensory pathways Increased intestinal Visceral Hypersenstivity permeability
Questions • What is the rationale to discuss the use of probiotics for the relief of symptoms in IBS ? • What are the demonstrated effects of probiotics ? • What is the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in IBS ?
Probiotics : mechanisms of action 1. Pathogens Probiotics Antimicrobial factors
Probiotics : mechanisms of action 2.
Probiotics : mechanisms of action 3 3. . From Gareau MG et al Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010;9:503-14
Questions • What is the rationale to discuss the use of probiotics for the relief of symptoms in IBS ? • What are the demonstrated effects of probiotics ? • What is the evidence for the efficacy of probiotics in IBS ?
Placebo controlled clinical trials of single or mixed probiotic preparations in IBS More than 3000 patients
Probiotics in IBS : Limitations of the published trials 1. Unpowered trials Studies (n) 1 – 40 50 – 99 100 – 199 200 – 299 300 - 399 Randomized patients (n) 2. Suboptimal Design : Inadequate blind, short duration, inappropriate end-points, lack of ITT analysis 3. For most strains : no reproducible evidence of efficacy
Probiotics in IBS : Results of meta-analyses Trials In favor of Global result probiotics Selected Analyzed Mc Farland 38 20 YES Persistence of symptoms : 2008 OR : 0.77 (IC 95% = 0.62-0.99) UK NICE 13 13 YES Improvement 2008 OR : 1.57 (IC 95% = 1.31-1,87) Hoveyda 22 14 YES Improvement : 2009 OR : 1.6 (IC 95% = 1.2-2.2) Brennan 16 16 YES Only one effective strain : 2009 B.infantis 35624 Moayyedi 26 18 YES Persistence of symptoms : 2010 OR : 0.71 (IC 95%= 0.57-0.88) NNT = 4 Ortiz-Lucas 24 10 YES Reduction of abdominal pain 2013 and distension
Evidence for a strain dependant effect Example O’Mahony L et al Gastroenterology 2005;128:541-51
Efficacy in any IBS sub-type ? • Probiotics have been mainly tested in IBS-D • No actual evidence of a greater efficacy in a particular IBS sub-type
Probiotics and bloating in IBS Before After Control DN -173010 Plethysmographic belt Agrawal A et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2009;29:104-14
Pathophysiology of IBS Central mechanisms Abnormal pain processing related Maladaptive to mood disorders coping Somatization
Limbic area Exposure to a stressor alters intestinal microbiota 1 Vagus nerve Dysbiosis can promote anxiety and alter cognitive functions 2 Production of mediators (GABA, serotonin…) 1. Bailey MT et al Brain Behav Immun 2011;25:397-407 2. Cryan JF et al Neurogastroenterol Motil 2011,23:187-92
Lactobacilli and HPA axis Lactobacillus acidophilus / Lactobacillus helveticus CRH * # ng/ml Gareau M et al Gut 2007;56:1522-8
Probiotics can modify stress-related symptoms Mixture of probiotics (L.acidophilus R-52 + B.Longum R-175) for 3 weeks Anorexia Bloating Abdominal Pain Diarrhoea Nausea Epigastric pain Constipation Reduction of intensity p=0.009 p=0.004 Diop L et al Nutrition Res 2008;28:1-5
Methane and slow transit Stool frequency Constipation severity Pimentel M et al Dig Dis Sci 2003;48:86-92 Kunkel D et al Dig Dis Sci 2011;56:1612-8 Furnari M et al J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2012;2:157-63
Meta-analysis of the effects of probiotics on colonic transit time • 11 trials • 464 patients and healthy volunteers • Jadad scale for RCTs : 3 (2-5) • B.Lactis HN019 • B.Lactis DN-173010 • More effective – In constipated patients – in older patients Miller JE et al World J Gastroenterol 2013;19:4718-25
Some probiotics can relieve constipation Exemple : Lactobacillus DN-173010 Guyonnet D et al Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007;26:465-76
Safety issues Trials analyzed Serious AE reported Mc Farland 20 NONE 2008 UK NICE 13 NONE 2008 Hoveyda 14 NONE 2009 Brennan 16 NONE 2009 Moayyedi 18 NONE 2010 Ortiz-Lucas 20 NONE 2013
Conclusions IBS • Probiotics, as a therapeutic category, seem a possible promising therapeutic option. • Studies of specific strains indicate that although some probiotics may improve individual symptoms, few have a global benefit
Currently available strategies for modifying gut microbiota Less effective More effective More invasive And/or less safe Gut-directed antibiotics Probiotics Prebiotics Exclusion diets FODMAP diet Stopping PPIs Less invasive And/or safer
Role of probiotics in the graduated treatment approach for IBS patients Multidisciplinary approach Reference to a pain center Severe + Pharmacotherapy Moderate Psychological treatments PROBIOTICS ? + Education Mild Reassurance Dietary modifications
Several questions to answer Which strain(s) ? One strain or a mixture ? Who are the patients candidates ? Which dose ? Which duration of treatment ?
You can also read