Dramatic Arts Integration Practices for Learning and Growth Across PK-12 Development
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
The Journal of the Arts and Special Education 1(1), 64-104 @2019 The Division of Visual and Performing Arts Education of the Council of Exceptional Children Dramatic Arts Integration Practices for Learning and Growth Across PK-12 Development Alida Anderson, American University, Washington, DC Kathleen M. Farrand, Arizona State University Christine Dobson, University of Kansas Wendy P. Oakes, Arizona State University Megan T. Deeg, Arizona State University Liora Valero, The Lab School of Washington, DC Abstract. This paper features three demonstrations of practice using dramatic and visual arts approaches (DIPSI, Academic Club, and Hope Project) with preschool through secondary school age students with exceptionalities. The first section provides a unifying theoretical background for the use of these practices. The next section presents each of the three projects, including their methods and main findings. The last section highlights the depth and breadth of these approaches, and includes implications for research and practice to address improved access to arts and special education for students with disabilities. The purpose of this paper is to summarize preschool teacher and researchers, Farrand, and synthesize three dramatic arts Oakes, and Deeg (Oakes, Farrand, & Troxel, integration practices implemented across PK- 2017). The team examined the degree to 12 education settings that included students which the teacher was able to implement with exceptionalities. These practices go dramatic inquiry with limited outside beyond approaches found in conventional supports and focused on a professional classroom settings and feature the use of learning partnership between the teacher integrated dramatic and visual arts activities and researchers and the social validity of the to promote learning and growth among dramatic inquiry intervention for the teacher students. Using Dramatic Inquiry to Increase and students. Student Engagement and Positive Social Interactions (DIPSI), the first featured The second demonstration of practice demonstration of practice, summarizes a presented in this article utilized Academic special education teacher’s experience using Club (Smith, 2005), a visual- and performing- dramatic inquiry with her preschool students arts integrated approach that researcher- in a special education preschool classroom. practitioners Anderson and Valero (2019) The collaborative team included the adapted to support middle-school students 64
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN with language-based learning disabilities to understanding learner growth, highlighting learn social studies content and social- strengths-based approaches to addressing emotional skills. In the Academic Club, learners’ individual needs. students learned social studies content related to the Italian Renaissance period Drama-based pedagogies and through in-role characterization and visual- theories of Vygotsky and Bakhtin. One arts activities supporting academic drama-based pedagogy that is especially vocabulary and reading comprehension. well suited for early childhood and Students’ language and social-emotional elementary age populations is dramatic skills were assessed using a mixed methods inquiry, an instructional approach in which approach that included vocabulary, self- students and their teachers co-create real report, and language sampling measures. and fictional worlds in the classroom through the social imagination of play. In the third practice snapshot, the Hope Participants use dramatization to explore Project, practitioner-researcher Dobson used real-world types of problems and to develop an arts-based intervention model to possible solutions (Edmiston, 2014). measure changes in adolescents’ (Grades 6- Participants create these fictional worlds by 10) self-reported levels of hope. This incorporating students’ interests, building demonstration of practice utilized multi- upon their background knowledge, and media visual arts and theatre to promote engaging inquiry processes that are like what connection and belonging among students in happens in the lives of people outside of the a community setting and to highlight classroom. Similar to dramatic inquiry, in- sociocultural dimensions of students’ role characterization and drama techniques learning. such as ‘Mantle-Of-The-Expert,’ have been used throughout elementary and adolescent Theoretical Background and Supporting age students with learning and behavioral Literature challenges to promote engagement and The three featured demonstrations of access to content learning (Anderson, 2012; practice are diverse in the populations they Bosch & Anderson, 2015). For example, the serve and approaches they use, as well as in DIPSI project utilized Mantle-Of-The-Expert their research methodologies; yet they to create fictional contexts for learning intersect in their theoretical underpinnings. (Farrand, Oakes, & Deeg, in press); students A robust literature base on dramatic arts took on roles as experts--a new, more integration in educational settings supports powerful role than their traditional role as these practices, as well as research on the students--to collaboratively solve a problem use of dramatic arts approaches to reach (Heathcote & Bolton, 1995). The Academic and teach individuals with exceptionalities Club used a similar approach, with middle (see Anderson & Berry, 2018 for a review). school age students who had learning and Findings from supporting literature bases attentional challenges taking roles from the emphasize a developmental approach to Italian Renaissance and embracing their 65
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 individual expertise while playing historical Drama-based pedagogies and figures such as Galileo and Michelangelo. cognitive-linguistic engagement. The three demonstrations of practice described in this The theories of Mikhail Bakhtin and Lev paper are informed by research that has Vygotsky broadly ground dramatic arts highlighted the value of dramatic arts practices in social interactionism. In integration practices for increasing particular, Bakhtin’s (1981) concept of educational opportunities, showing reliable dialogism relates to how students build upon causal relationships between dramatic arts the ideas of others through constant activities and verbal skills (Baum, Owen, & dialogue and negotiation and is similar to Oreck, 1997; Catterall, 2002, 2009; Hetland the Vygotskian theory of linguistic & Winner, 2000; Podlozny, 2000), especially interaction as the cornerstone of language-, for students with exceptionalities, as well as cognitive-, and social-development. These those from low socioeconomic and English projects feature the use of dialogism, in language learning backgrounds (Anderson & which students collaborate and brainstorm Loughlin, 2014; Ingram & Seashore, 2003; possible solutions to problems through their Robinson, 2013). In particular, the Academic new and unique perspectives (i.e., as self- Club approach draws on research supporting selected experts or characters in role). They the relationship between dramatic arts work “as one consciousness, voice, or activities and specific literacy skills, such as perspective answers another, searching for students’ reading comprehension, oral and meaning while connecting to prior written language production, and understanding in the real world and/or in a perspective taking (Anderson, 2012; Hoyt, real-and-imagined world” (Edmiston, 2014, 1992; Mason & Steedly, 2006; Podlozny, p. 8). Vygotskian theory also suggests that 2000; Rose, Parks, Androes, & McMahon, while working to solve problems together, 2001) for students with and without students are engaged in activities within exceptionalities (for a review, see Anderson, their zone of proximal development (i.e., Lee, & Brown, 2017). Dramatic arts optimally challenging activities where integrated learning contexts that utilize students can do more with the support of specific drama conventions have been linked others than they can do alone) and draw to improvements in students’ critical and upon multiple tools (e.g., language, music, creative thinking skills (e.g., ‘studio thinking,’ visual support, movement, gestures) to Hetland, Winner, Veenema, & Sheridan, make meaning and solve problems 2007), which is another dimension of the (Vygotsky, 1978). Thus, dramatic arts three featured practices. For example, with practices provide a method for teachers to dramatic role play, students may select an expand the tools for meaning making, while historical figure and assume its identity using providing students with increasingly diverse body, voice, and mind to express and ways to demonstrate their knowledge participate in episodes, vignettes, or points (Edmiston, 2014). in time (Heathcote & Bolton, 1995). In this approach, students take on roles as experts 66
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN who share knowledge, use contextual clues, engagement in arts-integrated learning and both high frequency and content area contexts to address the comorbid needs of vocabulary to create scenes (Clyde, 2003; students with exceptionalities (see Anderson Paul, 2002). Students use gestures and body et al., 2017 for a review). language to reinforce their understanding of historical figures’ intentions, thoughts, and Above and beyond a desire to use dramatic actions. These experiences enable students arts in classrooms and community settings to communicate concretely their mental to promote and sustain individualized representations of dramatic elements (e.g., learning outcomes, the three featured text, character, character’s feelings; demonstrations of practice align pedagogies Brouillette, 2010). that create opportunities for shared social and emotional engagement (Lincoln, Social-emotional engagement and González, & González, 2008). For example, drama-based pedagogies. The the third featured demonstration of practice, demonstrations of practice featured in this The Hope Project, incorporated the lived paper address students’ social-emotional experiences of students as material relevant engagement and are supported by research for study and exploration in order to foster that shows how language and literacy fully inclusive spaces for students (Kozleski & learning are mediated through cognitive and Waitoller, 2010). Hope Project practitioner- emotional-behavioral engagement researcher Dobson and her students (Anderson, 2015b; Anderson & Berry, 2014; collaborated to discover stories of societal Burnaford, 2007; Catterall, 2009; Eisner, inequity and marginalization, while building 1998). These practices are supported by a narratives of empowerment, thereby model of interrelated linguistic-cognitive and responding to and transforming students’ emotional-behavioral engagement learning landscape. (Anderson, 2015b), in which students’ learning experiences are transformed by The Hope Project, as well as Academic Club providing an alternative to conventional and DIPSI, reflect the idea that change is learning contexts that tend to exacerbate possible if research is informed their environmental and learning difficulties collaboratively through practice that is and pose motivational challenges (Anderson, grounded in naturalistic inquiry about 2015; Anderson & Berry, 2015). Although experiences of the participants themselves previous research (Anderson, 2012; Cornett, (Lincoln & Guba, 1985). For example, the 2007; Gillam, Gillam, & Reece, 2012; see Academic Club approach positioned Deasy, 2002 for a review) has shown that teachers, students, and researchers as co- dramatic arts integration practices support creators of the dramatic arts environment, in students’ linguistic and behavioral which they learned collaboratively and engagement differentially, few studies to shared expertise through in-role date have examined the interrelationships characterization and creation. In the DIPSI between cognitive-linguistic and behavioral project, dramatic inquiry was grounded in 67
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 the real contexts and interests of the 2. What do teachers and students think students. In the Hope Project, the about the use of dramatic inquiry in the collaboration between the researcher and classroom? student participants emphasized student participation and an approach of Participants and setting. In her “researching-with” rather than “researching- fourth year as an early childhood special for” that shaped the project’s participatory educator, the participating teacher, Marie, action methodology (Fine & Ruglis, 2009; taught 17 students in an inclusive preschool Freire, 1970). classroom. Marie reached out to the researchers because she was interested in Demonstration of Practice Snapshots learning about the research process and This section provides a detailed summary of learning how she could best support each demonstration of practice’s methods students’ engagement in class. She was and findings. First, the DIPSI early childhood interested in trying dramatic inquiry as a class practice using dramatic inquiry is presented. wide approach for circle time instruction. The Next, the Academic Club approach using university’s Institutional Review Board, school dramatic arts with elementary age students district, and principal approved the research is presented. Last, the Hope Project involving project prior to researchers obtaining consent theatre with adolescents is presented. from educators and parents. Seven of the students were girls, and students ranged in DIPSI: Dramatic Inquiry in the Early age from 3.3 to 5.7 years old (median = 4.6 Childhood Special Education Classroom years). The inclusive classroom included three The purpose of this demonstration of African American students, seven Caucasian practice was to examine the use of dramatic students, and seven Hispanic students. inquiry by a special education preschool Fourteen students were identified by the teacher in collaboration with a research district preschool multidisciplinary team as team. The project examined implementation having communication delays such as apraxia, fidelity and social validity of dramatic inquiry articulation delays, or specific language for supporting young children’s engagement impairments. To select focus students for this in learning and increasing social interactions study, Marie reviewed classroom data and opportunities to respond to instruction. including students’ Individualized Education Farrand, Oakes, and Deeg asked the Programs (IEPs) for related social and following research questions: emotional goals and Teaching Strategies Gold (Heroman, Tabors, & Teaching Strategies, 1. To what degree can the preschool 2010). After reviewing the data, Marie special education teacher implement identified four boys and one girl who she dramatic inquiry practices given limited thought would benefit from additional outside support? support to increase engagement in circle time, because these five students all demonstrated difficulty consistently 68
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN participating and sustaining attention in engaged in process drama strategies that whole group activities. allow students and their teachers to imagine themselves in different roles as they This study was implemented in an inclusive, construct knowledge together in real and afternoon-session, preschool classroom for fictional contexts created in the classroom. students identified with communication delays and their peers without disabilities. For this study, the research team The school utilized a morning and afternoon incorporated the process drama strategy preschool model in which students attended referred to as the Mantle-Of-The-Expert classes four half-days a week. There was no (Heathcote & Bolton, 1995) to frame school on Wednesdays to accommodate IEP students as experts (e.g., entomologists; meetings, student screenings, and teacher authors) who were commissioned to solve a planning and professional learning. The specific real-world problem (e.g., local classroom was located in a rural public farmers needed help to figure out how to school district in the Southwestern United stop insects from eating their crops; a local States. The study took place in the afternoon publishing company needed help creating a class during circle time (~30 mins). Typical book on ocean life) ( See Table 1.) Then, business-as-usual instruction followed a using specific active and dramatic inquiry predictable routine and lessons often strategies, teachers and their students focused around a color and letter of the collaborated in and out of role to explore week. The routine included selecting jobs, solutions to the problem (See Table 2). saying the Pledge of Allegiance, naming days of the week and weather, counting friends, Dramatic inquiry strategies, such as Mantle- reviewing the question of the day, taking a of-the-Expert, have been shown to benefit ‘wiggle’ break, sound practice, singing the students with disabilities because they can articulation song, and having story time. collaborate with peers and engage in a variety of learning modes (e.g. spoken Intervention. The intervention to language, objects, movement, and music) to promote active student engagement was an support meaning-making (Edmiston, 2007). instructional approach called dramatic Thus, dramatic inquiry practices offer a way inquiry. Dramatic inquiry encourages for teachers to expand the use and variety of students and their teachers to co-create real tools used for meaning-making, providing and fictional contexts in which to explore students with diverse ways to engage in real-world type problems and develop learning and demonstrate knowledge possible solutions through dramatic play (Edmiston, 2014). (Edmiston, 2014). This approach stems from Dorothy Heathcote’s work with process Procedures. Marie taught two drama (i.e., drama focused on the learning dramatic inquiry units with lessons during process rather than on developing a regular circle time using the Mantle-Of-The- theatrical production). Students are Expert approach (Heathcote & Bolton, 1995) 69
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Table 1. Mantle of the Expert Approach Mantle of the Entomologist Unit Authors Unit Expert Elements Fictional context Teacher and students agree to Teacher and students agree to pretend that their classroom is an pretend their classroom is an Entomology Lab. Teacher uses Authors’ Workshop. Teacher uses classroom materials to set up the classroom materials such as varied fictional lab such as magnifying writing materials, topical reference glasses, insects in various settings books, and student-written books for examination, and testing ideas. to set up the fictional workshop. Team Entomologists Authors Frame/expertise Teacher and students have Teacher and students have expertise as entomologists. expertise as authors. Commission Farmers need help with learning A publishing company needs about the insects eating their authors to create a book for young crops in order to identify how to children on ocean life. safely get rid of the insects. Client Local farmers Publishing company Source. Adapted from Aitken (2013). and dramatic strategies. Researcher Farrand each lesson, Marie put on a lab coat and designed the dramatic inquiry activities and children ‘stepped into the lab.’ This action content using student interests identified by cued students that they were transforming Marie. The researcher and Marie met before from students to expert entomologists. To and after each unit to discuss and model begin the unit, the teacher presented the strategies, lessons, activities, and materials, commission to students. She shared a letter but Marie did not receive additional outside from a fictitious local farmer who was asking support (i.e., daily coaching or feedback) for help with insects who were eating his during the implementation of the dramatic crops. Students engaged in the entomology inquiry units. Marie used outlines for each unit with daily activities in which they day of the approximately 8-day units that learned about insects to help the farmer included suggested activities aligned with (Farrand, 2017). As examples, students preschool standards and students’ IEP goals. participated in learning through movement (e.g., How do you think a cricket hops During the first unit, circle time became an through the farmer’s fields?). The student entomology laboratory where students took entomologists sang songs with motions to on the expert role of entomologists. To start explore how insects moved and what they 70
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN ate. At the end of the first unit, parents laboratories as they collaborated alongside entered the entomology lab and stepped in- their peers to make meaning and to solve role as farmers to engage actively in learning problems for a fictional client. The dramatic alongside their children about the ways they inquiry units also provided families with an could solve their insect problem. opportunity to step-in-role as farmers and publishers to participate in dramatic play Throughout the second unit, students alongside their child. became authors commissioned by a publishing company to create a book about Design. In this initial study of marine life for young children and their dramatic inquiry in inclusive preschool families. Then, students-in-role as authors classrooms, the research team was along with their teacher-in-role as an author interested in exploring the degree to which worked together to learn about ocean the teacher was able to implement the animals and plants while they brainstormed dramatic inquiry strategies and the ways to create an engaging book for perception of the teacher and students students and families. Marie invited parents about dramatic inquiry. To address research to step-in-role at the end of this unit as question one, Marie and a research team publishers to listen to students-in-role as member completed a treatment integrity authors read the ocean book that they measure for each lesson. The team used created. descriptive statistics to compute the daily and unit mean for the teacher and each Taking on these expert roles, students participating student. The measure was a stepped outside of their student roles and component checklist of the major elements engaged in perspective taking. They of dramatic inquiry scores for presence or experienced learning through inquiry to absence of each element (discussed below). solve a problem that was specific to their To address research question two, Marie and interests (insects and ocean animals) and the target students in her classroom contextually authentic. They explored completed social validity surveys before the learning and conveyed their knowledge and entomologist unit and upon completion of ideas through movement, spoken language, the authors’ unit. singing, drawing, moving manipulatives, pointing, and hand motions-–all ways of Measures. A treatment fidelity showing what they knew was valued. Two checklist was used to assess fidelity of specific dramatic inquiry strategies that Marie’s dramatic inquiry implementation promoted the use of multiple modes of (Barton, Meaden-Kaplansky, & Ledford, response are stepping-in-role and move like 2018). It included major components of the a character (See Table 2). Dramatic inquiry dramatic inquiry intervention (adapted from transformed the learning space through the Oakes, Lane, Jenkins, & Booker, 2013). Marie children’s imagination in their fictional recorded her observations of 16 teacher 71
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Table 2. Dramatic Inquiry Strategies and Examples from Authors’ Unit Drama Strategy/ Example Providing Differentiation Description Stepping-in-Role: The teacher begins by placing Students who may have difficulty Teachers and/or a lanyard around her neck saying the word author are invited students signal with a with a pen and tells students to make the visual cue of putting sound effect, that when she puts on her on their lanyards and making the movement, or specific lanyard she is stepping-n-role ‘a’ sound for author. The visual action that they are as an author. Next, the cue lets all students and adults about to step-in-role teacher invites students to know that the individual is and take on a fictional put on their lanyards and say entering the fictional space role as an expert that is “author” to signal that they created in the classroom to taking designed based on the are stepping-in-role to on an expert role for inquiry context for the inquiry. become expert authors. learning. Move like a character: Teachers and students step in All participants are invited to use Students and teachers role as fish to swim in the multiple modes, such as take on a role to fictional ocean space created movement, sound, and sight to experience and identify in their classroom. They move understand and explore the how the character, their hands like a fish as they perspective of the character they animal, or object swim around the classroom. are becoming for this strategy. moves. Students are able to use different parts of their body and select the mode or modes that they want to use to experience and participate. Source. Adapted from Oakes, Farrand, and Troxel (2017). items and 14 student items. Some examples purposefully omitted (7). Researchers are Teacher positioned students with calculated scores by dropping omitted items, authority by labeling them as an expert using summing all expected items, dividing by total the dramatic context of the lesson; Teacher number of expected items, and multiplying joined in and pretended with students. by 100 for a percentage of expected, not Teacher adapted the physical space purposefully omitted items. (removed chairs or furniture, moved furniture to create small groups or A research team member observed and structures, used existing space to create a independently scored 100% (n = 15) of fictional space of text; (See Table 3). Items lessons using the same treatment integrity were marked as expected and not completed protocol as Marie. Researchers calculated (0), expected and completed (1), or interobserver agreement (IOA) using a point- 72
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Table 3. Example Fidelity Checklist Items and Sample Coding By Score Item to be Observed Completed Item (1) Not Completed Item (0) Teacher positioned Teacher referred to each Teacher referred to everyone students with authority by student as ‘author’ preceding collectively as authors when labeling them as an expert their name (e.g., Author they first stepped in-role, but using the dramatic context Rosie) throughout the entire then used only their first names of the lesson. in-role experience to position throughout the lesson. students as expert authors. Teacher joined in and Teachers and students, in-role Students, in-role as fish, swam pretended with students. as fish, swam around the around the classroom, while classroom. Teacher modeled the teacher watched students the movement. from the circle time rug. Teacher adapted the Teacher told the class to swim Teacher told students to swim physical space (removed around the ocean as fish. She like fish in their spots on the chairs or furniture, moved encouraged students to go carpet. Although she allowed furniture to create small beyond the circle-time carpet them to imagine they are fish, groups or structures, used to imagine they are freely they were restricted to the existing space to create a swimming in the ocean. typical classroom space for fictional space of text). circle time. Source. Fidelity checklist adapted from Oakes et al. (2012). See Oakes et al. (2012) for the example form. by-point method. The research team Menzies, Ennis, & Oakes, 2015). To minimize computed the number of agreements concerns with the accuracy of self-report divided by the sum of agreements and measures by young children with disabilities, disagreements multiplied by 100. IOA was Marie administered the survey to each 82.14% (SD = 12.24) and 59.82% (SD = 12.24) participating student individually by reading for units 1 and 2, respectively, with an each of the seven questions aloud and overall average of 70.98% (SD = 18.08). Due asking students to color in a smiley face to to the low agreement, both teacher- and show their level of agreement on a 6-point researcher-reported fidelity scores are scale (1 = sad face to 6 = happy face). The reported in the results section to follow. research team interpreted student surveys in conjunction with students’ comments about Target students completed social validity the lessons for a better understanding of surveys after the introduction of the their feelings about the dramatic inquiry entomology unit (pre) and after the end of intervention. Items included I think I will like the author unit (post; adapted from Lane, learning through drama. Some items were 73
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 negatively phrased and so were reverse First, the intervention strategy choices may coded. Scores ranged from 7 to 42 with have been too great, adding additional higher scores indicating greater acceptability. complexity to the intervention (Baker, Marie completed an adapted Intervention Kupersmidt, Voegler-Lee, Arnold, & Rating Profile – 15 (Lane et al., 2015; Witt & Willoughby, 2010). The complexity of the Elliott, 1985) pre (after consenting) and post intervention may have led to Marie feeling a (after conclusion of the second unit). The 15 lack of confidence in her use of the overall items are rated on a Likert-type scale from 1 intervention and its specific elements. (strongly disagree) to 6 (strongly disagree). Future studies could explore intervention Total scores ranged from 15 to 90 with fidelity with fewer dramatic strategy choices higher score indicating greater acceptability or with the introduction of one strategy at a of the intervention goals, procedures and time to build the teacher’s fluency. outcome. Second, teacher and student interest in Findings and discussion. The first content could influence treatment fidelity research question was, to what degree can between the two units. The topic or related the preschool special education teacher activities for the authors’ unit may not have implement dramatic inquiry practices with been as interesting to Marie or the students limited outside support (i.e., initial training as the insect unit. In this practice and materials but without ongoing demonstration, the research team measured coaching)? The teacher-completed fidelity pre- and post-intervention social validity scores ranged from 62.50 to 87.50% (M = across both units; however, future studies 77.50; SD = 9.38) for the insect dramatic could measure social validity for each unit to inquiry unit (7 lessons) and 18.75 to 68.75% explore the influence of interest on (M = 46.88; SD = 25.22) for the oceans implementation (Lane et al., 2009). author unit (8 lessons). Researcher- completed fidelity data also showed the Third, Marie expressed difficulty with insect unit was implemented with higher shifting regular routines in order to fidelity (M = 92.86; SD = 4.31; range = 87.5 to implement dramatic inquiry. For example, 100%) than the oceans author unit (M = Marie began by inviting students to step-in- 81.25; SD = 14.56; range = 50.00 to 93.75%). role and become experts with her to begin This data showed Marie’s difficulty in fully circle time, and she and completed one or implementing all elements of the dramatic two activities connected to the theme, such inquiry activities, with all teacher-reported as walk like a character where students were scores below the ideal 90% implementation invited to swim like a fish. However, Marie level to have confidence in any measured retained circle time routines unrelated to the student outcomes (thus, student outcomes inquiry, such as calendar or choosing jobs. are not reported for this study). There are While preschool circle time routines may be several potential reasons for lower than theme-based, an important mechanism for ideal fidelity. engagement is the connection to the inquiry 74
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN (Aitken, 2013). For example, students sharing their opinions with more experience discussed the size of different ocean in the learning activities. Marie shared that animals; connection to the inquiry would “students came to class excited every day.” extend this activity to relate animal size She also shared that parents commented, directly to the inquiry question for the unit. “My child wants to be an entomologist and Future research could address how an author when he gets older” and “My additional coaching supports, such as daily child showed me how to step into her role.” email or co-teaching, might increase Readers should interpret students’ social implementation fidelity and support validity scores with caution, as young teachers in rethinking and reteaching children’s self-report scores may not be an conventional early childhood classroom accurate reflection of their true feelings. routines to enhance connections to the Consistent with research on self-report inquiry process. measures broadly, self-report of social validity may also be influenced by social The second research question was, what do desirability; that is, the participant wanting teachers and students think about the use of to report a favorable feeling (e.g., teacher to dramatic inquiry in the classroom? Marie researchers, students to teacher). Future rated the dramatic inquiry intervention as research should consider utilizing multiple acceptable (i.e., mean score of 5, agree, or measures to examine social validity of the greater) with a score of 87 (96.67%; item M intervention from multiple stakeholders’ = 5.80; SD = 0.40). Although the post- perspectives, including parents’. intervention score was slightly lower (83; 92.22%; item M = 5.53; SD = 0.50); the score Issues of treatment integrity and social indicates an overall favorable perception of validity are central to the work of promoting the intervention (Wolf, 1978). As stated new practices within classroom settings. This previously, future research could examine study highlights the need for considering social validity from the teacher after each implementation data prior to making unit to see if views vary based on the topic decisions about the effect of the of interest for both teachers and students. intervention on student learning and This may also inform issues of fidelity, as engagement outcomes. Findings also social validity is a predictor for fidelity (Lane indicate that traditional professional learning et al., 2009). (e.g., workshops or presentations, access to materials) may be insufficient to promote Students expressed hesitancy about the change in practices, even with highly intervention initially, as indicated by pre- motivated teachers. Coaching and other intervention social validity scores (M = ongoing supports may be needed for 26.80; SD = 7.60). Post-intervention social teachers to feel confident in their knowledge validity scores suggested the intervention about and use of new practices. exceeded students’ expectations (M = 33.40; SD = 3.65) or that they felt more confident in 75
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Academic Club Approach and Students’ school in the mid-Atlantic region of the U.S. Linguistic and Social-Emotional Engagement The research team explored two dimensions Similar to the collaborative research- of engagement: (a) cognitive-linguistic practitioner team in the DIPSI practice, engagement, in which students understand Anderson and Valero (2019) examined the and use complex vocabulary; and (b) influence of a visual and performing arts emotional-behavioral engagement, in which integrated social studies intervention on students show self-efficacy, interest, and on- students’ linguistic engagement. In this task behavior during academic tasks. practice, the influence of the intervention Students with language-based LD have been was measured by academic language skills considered among those at highest risk for (i.e., expressive language productivity and school failure due to struggles in acquiring receptive vocabulary). Students’ social- language and literacy (Bridgeland, Dilulio, & emotional engagement and arts skills were Morison, 2006; Scott, 2004) and academic also assessed. Participants were middle- language (Westby, 1994). school aged students with language-based learning disabilities (LD). Language-based LD The teacher, Ms. Valero, had 10 years of refers to primary difficulties with teaching experience as a classroom teacher understanding and/or using verbal or written and as a visual and performing teaching language (Swanson, Harris, & Graham, artist. She collaborated with the research 2013). Researcher Anderson and practitioner team to develop all intervention procedures Valero investigated whether Academic Club and measures over 25 weeks. The research participation supported students with LD to team included the researcher, Ms. Valero (a) learn grade-level social studies academic and a master’s level graduate research vocabulary, (b) improve their expressive assistant, who conducted interviews, language skills, and (c) improve their transcribed, coded, and analyzed all data learning attitudes toward arts and social collected in the study. Student participants studies content learning. This project’s included 25 fifth graders (12 boys, 13 girls) primary research question was whether between ages 11 and 12 (M = 11.2, SD = 0.5) participation in Academic Club over an 8- who (a) were identified as having a specific week period influenced the academic language-based LD; (b) had specific language (receptive and expressive) of fifth- academic language and/or vocabulary goals grade students with language-based LD. in their IEPs; (c) had IQ scores of 85 or above; and (d) exhibited frequent off-task Participants and setting. The project behaviors such as calling out, interrupting, focused on the integrated use of visual getting out of seat, and not following (perspective drawing) and dramatic arts directions. Table 4 summarizes the cognitive (Mantle-Of-The-Expert, Reader’s Theatre, and linguistic descriptive characteristics of and Tableau) strategies across four self- participating students. contained classrooms taught by Ms. Valero at an urban, self-contained, nonpublic day 76
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Table 4. Means and Standard Deviations of full-scale IQ, Verbal Comprehension, Perceptual Reasoning, Working Memory, Processing Speed, and Visual-Motor Integration Scores of Participating Students with Language-Based Learning Disabilities. Female Male (N=15) (N=10) Mean SD Range Mean SD Range Age (in years) 12.13 .51 11.1-12.1 12.23 .66 11.1-12.3 WISC-IV Full Scale IQ 104.54 10.48 89-119 99.44 11.48 86-118 Verbal Comprehension 108.6 9.99 95-121 106.4 17.61 89-128 Perceptual Reasoning 104.27 11.78 84-119 100.7 11.98 82-121 Working Memory 96.8 10.73 74-110 91.6 12.46 74-116 Processing Speed 101.3 12.85 78-126 87.6 10.32 73-103 Visual-Motor Integration 88.5 8.6 66-102 84.22 6.11 75-94 Note: All scores are standard scores with a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15. Intervention. The Academic Club The Academic Club classroom was approach is a cornerstone of the curriculum transformed into a themed space by club at the elementary school where the study members, in which students participated in took place. Academic Clubs (Smith, 2005) are project-based and simulated explorations of known to embed highly structured, multi- history, literature, geography, science, sensory (visual, auditory, tactile, and archaeology, and sociology, through visual kinesthetic) learning activities within a and performing arts activities. The simulated historical time and place to teach instructional text of Dante’s Inferno was the targeted social studies content (e.g., Italian focus of the drama practice demonstration. Renaissance, Middle Ages, American This unit comprised an 8-week intervention Revolution). Students enact roles of major period that featured the use of drama historical figures and learn about the history strategies (Mantle-Of-The-Expert, previously and events of the period through the described; and Tableau, or pictures frozen in perspective of their characters/figures. The time and space using bodies, see Figure 1) to Club cultivates collaboration through understand and enact concepts from social participant membership and ownership, as studies text of Dante’s Inferno and visual students and teachers take on significant arts. historical and cultural roles within time periods such as the Italian Renaissance (e.g., For example, students created perspective Galileo Galilei, Leonardo da Vinci). paintings (see Figure 2) and visual guides (see Figure 3) corresponding with Dante’s Inferno to understand and recall key 77
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Figure 1. Students Creating Tableau to Show Understanding of Vocabulary through Enactment Figure 2. Progression of Student-Created Perspective Paintings from Photographs to Watercolor Paintings. 78
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Figure 3. Student-Created Visual Guide of Key Concepts and Vocabulary from Dante’s Inferno. refine their visual guides corresponding with targeted concepts from the reading and vocabulary, with teacher feedback. In Weeks 7-8, students created props, scenery, costumes, and scripts for their character- based dramatic enactments, completed their visual guides, and participated in interviews with the research team. Design and data analytic procedures. This mixed-methods design involved language sampling, vocabulary, and self- report measures across the intervention period to understand the relationship between the arts learning context, cognitive- linguistic engagement, and emotional- academic concepts (e.g., technological behavioral engagement for students with innovations, key themes from Dante’s comorbid learning and behavioral Inferno). challenges. The following chart (Table 5) shows the Measures. The research team intervention sequence using the dramatic interviewed students while in role on social approaches. studies content as well as on their experience and feelings about dramatic arts During Weeks 1-2, Ms. Valero introduced and social studies at the beginning and end students to Mantle-Of-The-Expert and of the 8-week intervention period. The tableau to target expressive language interviews lasted between 3-5 minutes (M = through highly contextualized activities using 4.5, SD = .24) in length in week 1; and bodies, gestures, expressions, and props to between 4-6 minutes (M = 5.8, SD = .33) in convey ideas. In Weeks 3-4, students week 8. Students completed a 20-item developed two-dimensional visual guides to vocabulary assessment at the beginning and accompany their reading and enacting of end of the intervention period (see Appendix Dante’s Inferno, along with enacting scenes A). The assessment included grade-level and in-role from the Renaissance using key social studies vocabulary that corresponded vocabulary terms. In Weeks 5-6, students with visual guides and dramatic enactments. developed and performed tableau to depict Students completed self-reports of their story and action sequences from the social learning attitudes towards social studies and studies text. They continued to develop and arts at the beginning and end of the 79
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Table 5. Sequence of Academic Club Intervention Lessons Integrating Visual and Dramatic Arts Weeks Arts Activities Contextualized Language Activities Outcomes 1-2 • Mantle-of-the- • Use of bodies, gestures, • Receptive language Expert expressions, and props to (vocabulary, concepts) • Tableau convey concepts and ideas. 3-4 • Visual Guide • Reading/enacting Dante’s • Expressive language (use Inferno of key vocabulary) • In-role characterization 5-6 • Tableau • Developing/performing tableau • Depiction of story and using peer editing and feedback action sequences from text • Visual Guide • Developing/revising visual • Revision of visual guides guide with targeted concepts for accuracy and and vocabulary from teacher understanding of feedback. concepts 7-8 • Creating props, • Creating script for character- • Interview scenery, costumes based dramatic enactments. • Completion of visual guide • Script for character- based enactment intervention period (see Appendix B). Ms. intervals, the research team used a video Valero assessed students’ visual and digital recorder to capture students’ dramatic arts skills using a criterion-based interviews, examining students’ oral rubric, based on the neighborhood public- language by transcribing and analyzing school district’s Common Core Arts samples for the presence of academic Standards for Grade 5 in visual and language features. To better understand the performing arts, which was co-developed by potential influence of the intervention Ms. Valero and the research team. context on each student’s unique language functioning, language data were evaluated Data collection. Language and within each student across time, as well as behavioral data were collected at beginning pooled by students and time (pre-post). and end of the 8-week intervention period. All Academic Club lessons were conducted in Procedurally, the research team directed the participating students’ fixed length 40- students individually to a quiet area directly minute small group sessions, which included outside the classroom to administer the in- six classes of 5-9 students). At pre-post role interviews (see Appendix C for interview 80
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN protocol). If students did not mention any students, defined as the number of total characters or events in their initial words produced by each student per oral responses, the researchers provided initial interview and expressed as a rate of use over prompts. If students stopped talking and duration of total time of interview. Students’ made eye contact with the researcher, the language specificity was measured through researcher provided a follow-up prompt, “Is semantic diversity, or number of different there anything else you want to tell me words as a proportion of the total number of about [name of event/character]?” When words (Greenhalgh & Strong, 2001). the student stopped talking and made eye Receptive academic vocabulary was contact again, the researcher stopped the measured by pre-post assessment score digital recorder and the session concluded. changes. Self-efficacy was measured pre- Students completed pre-post vocabulary post self-report changes on a 4-point Likert measures and self-report measures in small scale rating of social validity (1 for “strongly groups, in which items were read aloud, disagree”, 4 was “strongly agree”). including practice items. Findings. Table 6 shows students’ Students’ language samples were mean language changes from pre- to post- transcribed and coded for linguistic interview sampling context along with productivity and specificity. At the end of changes to students’ self-report ratings and data collection, two secondary data coders mean vocabulary scores from beginning to (two master’s-level graduate students) were end of the Academic Club intervention trained on scoring procedures for the period. language variables under consideration and maintained an overall inter-rater agreement When comparing students’ expressive oral of at least 90% during each fidelity scoring language from pre- to post-interview session. Two trained research assistants and samples, students’ mean linguistic authors completed transcriptions to 95% productivity (total words per utterance, Pre reliability. The analysis set contained = 5.57 vs. Post = 6.34), total words used (Pre complete and intelligible utterances, = 214 vs. Post = 452), as well as total time in excluding dysfluencies. If reliability had minutes (Pre = 4.5 vs. Post = 5.8) increased dropped below 90%, the two secondary data significantly (p = .00). Academic Club coders would have met to review their participation appeared to influence discrepancies before scoring additional students’ academic vocabulary acquisition, language samples (Kennedy, 2005). as indicated by significant increases on mean number of academic vocabulary words Students’ oral language skills were assessed known (Pre = 13.7 vs. Post = 16.9, p = .00). for linguistic productivity and specificity from Students’ self-reported attitudes toward beginning to end of the Academic Club social studies learning and self-efficacy intervention period. Students’ linguistic increased significantly from beginning to end productivity was measured within and across of the intervention period (Pre = 2.9 vs. Post 81
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 Table 6. Students’ Mean Language, Learning Attitudes, and Arts Skills from Pre-to Post- Intervention Outcome Measures Pre-Mean (SD) Post-Mean (SD) p-value Receptive language: Academic Vocabulary 13.96 (.22) 17.64 (.13) .000*** (raw score) Expressive language: Linguistic Productivity 5.57 (.54) 6.34 (.63) .024* Total words per utterance Number of total words 214 452 .000*** Learning Attitudes: Social Studies Learning 2.96 (.47) 3.5 (.33) .000*** Learning attitudes: Learning Efficacy 2.9 (.44) 3.4 (.37) .001** Arts Skills Visual Arts 1.2 (.5) 3.2 (.7) .014* Performing Arts 1.1 (.7) 2.9 (.5) .003** ***p=.000 ** p
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN marginalized by socio-political issues such as social change is relatively underexplored ethnicity/race, socioeconomic status, ability, (Perry, 2011). Researcher-practitioner and gender identity (Fine & Ruglis, 2009). Dobson used Devised Theatre and Practitioner-based evidence from this photography collection debriefing based on demonstration supports the significance of Photovoice (Wang & Burris, 1997) to elicit opportunities for adolescent student collaborative groupwork among participating expression in efforts to promote students in a one-week intervention period. socioemotional skills such as resilience, engagement, and empathy (Debnam, The Hope Project drew on Freire’s Johnson, Waasdorp, & Bradshaw, 2014). educational philosophy, which emphasizes the gap between audience and actor, in the Hope construct. Snyder and same way that researcher Dobson scaffolded colleagues (1991) define hope as “a positive students toward their own empowerment, motivational state that is based on an suggesting that “Knowledge emerges only interactively derived sense of successful through invention and re-invention, through agency (goal-directed energy) and pathways the restless, impatient, continuing, hopeful (planning to meet goals)” (p. 8). Hope theory inquiry human beings pursue in the world, is subdivided into four thought categories: with the world and with each other” (1970, (1) Goal thoughts, which provide direction p. 72). Theatre has been identified as a and an endpoint for hopeful thinking; (2) culturally responsive tool drawing on Freire’s Pathway thoughts, or the routes to achieve critical, hopeful, and liberating educational goals and perceived ability to produce these pedagogy, which has been adapted to routes; (3) Agency thoughts, or the theatre-based pedagogy by Boal (Boal, 1979; motivation to undertake the pathways Freire, 1970). Examining education for towards goals; and (4) Barrier thoughts, critical consciousness, Freire’s ideas which block goal attainment and can result emphasize students as partners in their own in giving up or the use of pathway thoughts empowerment. Devised Theatre, in which to create new routes. students are working without a script and creating knowledge together, was an Hope and theatre. This important element of this pilot project. demonstration of practice assessed adolescent students’ reported levels of Participants and setting. The Hope feelings of hope following participation in an Project included students with and without arts-based intervention model using theatre disabilities who attended a middle school or and photography. Theatre practitioners have high school in a midwestern university town, recognized the value of creative processes to during summer. Reported challenges shared facilitate healing, growth, empathy, and by parents, caregivers, and participants hope, among other inter- and intra-personal included ADHD, depression, and anxiety benefits; however, theatre work in the disorder. The group consisted of 11 context of educational pedagogy aimed at students: 9 girls and 2 boys in grades ranging 83
ARTS AND SPECIAL EDUCATION FALL 2019 from 6th to 10th grades. Two identified as public performance or project. Acting games, African American or mixed-race, one writing prompts, drawing and collaging, writing identified as LGBTQ, and two students scenes, creating sculptures, devised theatre, and disclosed mental health concerns. Dobson music were all used with the goal to build a recruited participants in an all-inclusive culminating project to be shared with families manner, welcoming all individuals regardless and public. Dobson took notes daily on what of race/ethnicity, social class, gender, or transpired and how students reacted to prompts ability. This participant group was not and games. For instance, Dobson used story- representative of the surrounding building in various exercises by starting with a midwestern population. Inclusion and prompt and sending the story around the circle, diversity were cornerstones of this project, each participant adding a sentence or two. The as students came from different students employed independent writing, backgrounds, with different levels of responding to Dobson’s requests to share a time experience in creative process work, and “I cried and cried” or “hope is….” The group with varying levels of comfort in working worked in small teams to create scenes, crafting within groups. vignettes about themes such as “saving the world” or “the best day ever.” The group Procedures. Dobson used Devised worked together to build on several theatre Theatre and Photovoice to explore with activities over the week, culminating in a students their expressions, feelings, and final performance. The students identified experiences of hope. She investigated elements they deemed important and whether students’ perceived feelings of created a variety of activities, such as hope could change as the result of including musical accompaniment during the participation in the project. final performance. Devised theatre. Devising a piece of Photovoice. Dobson employed theatre incorporates the individual talents photography in the project, adapting and builds upon the collective inspiration of Photovoice (Wang & Burris, 1997), in which a group of participants in developing a students captured and shared pictures taken performance or play (Oddey, 2013). The in their community to create stories based culminating project is created not in a linear on themes that they identified as most line but one in which we encounter “well- important to them. Students took pictures trodden paths, blind alleys and sudden of “hope” using mobile phones and personal surprises” (Graham & Hoggett, 2014). The cameras in the surrounding neighborhood first step to devising together is playing vicinity. They were instructed to photograph together, so Dobson invited students to play natural and physical objects and spaces, games and engage in trust building exercises rather than people. They debriefed the daily to build trust and group cohesion. Over group on their photographs and developed the week, students created scenes, monologues from these debriefing sessions. monologues, and vignettes, culminating in a 84
COUNCIL FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN Figure 4. Sample of Student (Evie) Photograph and Corresponding Monologue about Hope “The cracks in the sidewalk represent the loss of hope and resilience. It first represents how a person may seem tough and unbreakable but may be more fragile than they appear. The cracks in the sidewalk could have been caused by a random event, such as a car crash, or something as simple as a brick falling and hitting the ground too hard. This relates to how a wide array of events can cause a person to give up hope and crack. However, the grass growing through the cracks represents how if you are resilient, you can fix your problems, and push through and continue to thrive”. (Evie). Figure 5. Sample of Student (Lara) Photograph and Corresponding Monologue about Hope “This picture is hopeful because it shows the future that I’m fighting for. OBVIOUSLY. (points to the rainbows she drew on her arms) In the picture, there’s an American flag alongside a gay pride flag, and I took it because it shows that these 2 groups go hand in hand. There are queer Americans and there are Americans that support queer rights, and whichever category the owner of the pride flag falls into doesn’t matter. We don’t know if the two flag owners were trying to contradict each other, maybe the American flag belongs to somebody who is against queer rights, but in putting both the flags up it gives me hope that people will realize that these groups aren’t as different as people think.” (Lara) 85
You can also read