Digital Assets in A Post-Cycle World - 2022 Outlook - Sean FarrellAC - FSInsight
←
→
Page content transcription
If your browser does not render page correctly, please read the page content below
2022 Outlook Digital Assets in A Post-Cycle World Sean FarrellAC Head of Digital Asset Strategy Twitter: @Seanmfarrell 1
Things to Keep in Mind • Bitcoin is still King • Ethereum is different than Bitcoin • The rest is venture capital (or call options) • Demand matters now • Flows > Fundamentals • You will not time the market correctly • Info Asymmetry = Advantage • Every dip looks like a buying opportunity in hindsight 3
2021 Performance Recap Chart 2021 Performance 7.0 Asset/Index % Return 6.0 Global Crypto Market Cap 188% Ethereum 398% Bitcoin 59% 5.0 Nasdaq 100 27% S&P 500 29% 4.0 3.0 2.0 1.0 0.0 Dec '20 Jan '21 Feb '21 Mar '21 Apr '21 May '21 Jun '21 Jul '21 Aug '21 Sep '21 Oct '21 Nov '21 Dec '21 Global Crypto Market Cap Ethereum Bitcoin Nasdaq 100 S&P 500 Source: TradingView 4
Survey Results Show Importance of Demographics What is your primary reason for investing in Bitcoin? Are you happy with the crypto investment options at your current (Of respondents with >0% allocation to crypto) brokerage account? A hedge against inflation 11% 16% A lack of correlation to other asset 23% 10% classes No 8% Distrust in the current financial system Not Applicable 55% Yes 55% High-growth technology investment 21% Still a Risk Asset for most Price seems to go up a lot Out of the Following Entities, which do you trust the most? Average of “How likely are you to increase your allocation to crypto over the next 12 months?” (Segmented by Age Group) 53% (0 = Very Unlikely, 10 = Very Likely) Demographics 6.5 are destiny 41% 5.9 6.1 39% 5.7 35% 5.4 31% 4.8 29% 24% 3.9 21% 20% 2% 4% 2% Bitcoin Facebook (Meta) Goldman Sachs US Government > 44 45-54 55+ 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75 or older Overall Source: FSI Digital Assets Quarterly Survey 5
2022 is much different than 2018 • Correlation to macro factors is much more pronounced. Bitcoin and broader crypto market now correlate strongly with tech stocks due to legacy market capital entering the fold. • In 2017, traditional hedge funds, banks, and wealth managers did not have capital tied up in crypto. Therefore, the drawdown was mainly due to decreased sentiment among crypto-natives and, quite frankly, a general lack of good projects to trust with your capital. Source: FS Insight, TradingView 6
2022 is much different than 2018 • BTC is demonstrating a strong inverse correlation to the US 10Y • Despite the slew of reasons to be constructive on the industry, the fear & greed index is in “extreme fear” territory. Source: FS Insight, TradingView, Alternative.me 7
2022 is much different than 2018 • Crypto mining was banned from Mainland China in June, only to recover and reach an ATH less than 7 months later. • This eliminated a major perceived risk to the network, put the United States at the forefront of the mining industry, and augmented the geopolitical relevance of Bitcoin. • Plurality of hash rate in an environmentally greener state with comparatively open capital markets China bans BTC mining Hash Rate ATH
2022 is much different than 2018 • A deluge of long-term oriented capital entered the market in 2021, as VCs rushed to fund projects across DeFi, Web3, NFTs, Infrastructure, and centralized finance (the onramps) Crypto VC Funding ($billions) 2021 VC Deal Breakdown $30.2 6% 19% 52% 23% $2.9 $3.1 2019 2020 2021 DeFi Web3/NFTs Infrastructure CeFi Source: FS Insight, Google, Dove Metrics, The Block 9
2022 is much different than 2018 • As previously noted, the industry has experienced massive growth. The emergence of an application layer generating economic activity for token holders is one of the starkest differences between now and the end of the prior halvening cycle. Worldwide Google Trends Top dApps by Revenue ($billions) 100 $1.80 90 $1.60 80 $1.40 70 $1.20 60 $1.00 50 $0.80 40 $0.60 30 $0.40 20 $0.20 10 $0.00 0 Jan '21 Apr '21 Jul '21 Oct '21 Web3 Bitcoin NFT Ethereum Source: TokenTerminal, Google, dApp Revenue is for the 365 days through 1/31/2022 10
The Playing Field Looks Much Different Now • Corporates, traders, funds, and countries embraced Digital Gold on a global scale • El Salvador was the first – what happens if more join? Genesis Q4 2021 Quarterly Report $140 2020 2021 $120 $100 $80 $60 $40 $20 $0 Loan Originations Total Active Loans Spot Volume Derivatives Notional Traded Value Traded Source: Glassnode, Cambridge University 11
In Summary: N’T Coming 12
Table of 1 Introduction 2 Bitcoin Contents 3 Ethereum 4 Crypto Thesis Update 5 Crypto Equities 13
What happened to $100k? • Institutional adoption is a double-edged sword. Despite bullish underlying supply trends, BTC became heavily correlated with equities toward the end of Q4 2021, and consequently sold-off in the face of Fed tightening. • Using realized cap as a proxy for inflows, we can see that demand vanished in late November. Source: Glassnode, TradingView 14
Cycle Comparison • While price rebounded in 2021, we never achieved what many would consider an overly frothy valuation. • Price relative to security spend (P/B) peaked well short of the high reached in the prior two cycles • Interestingly, thus far the median P/B is much higher than the prior two halvening cycles – a sign of maturation? Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 15
Cycle Comparison • BTC valuation multiples were much “flatter” compared to prior halvening cycles, pointing toward more efficient price discovery and perhaps signaling the transition from payment network to store-of-value. • Are we are moving to a post-cycle world? We think so. 2012 vs 2020 Halvening - Market Cap / Realized Value 7.0x 5.9x 6.4x 6.0x 3.7x 2012 5.0x 2020 4.0x 2.7x 3.0x 2.0x 1.0x 0.0x 1 101 201 301 401 501 601 701 Days Post Halvening Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 16
Incredibly Bullish Supply-Side Dynamics • An often-overlooked element of investing in BTC is the variable liquidity of the market as some wallets are less likely to liquidate holdings compared to others. • Illiquid entities(1) briefly sold-off in early 2021 but have since accumulated steadily – now comprise >75% of circulating supply. • The current supply dynamics can best be described as a powder keg. The question remains who lights the match. Illiquid entities BTC to non- accumulating custodial wallets Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 17
Demand Matters (“the match”) • The supply shocks of a halvening event used to be the major driver of inflows. Given widespread adoption of crypto - macro, geopolitical, and industry-specific factors must be considered. Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 18
Bull Markets Determined by Inflows Not Cycles • Viewing bull and bear markets through the lens of cycles is limiting. • We think a better way to delineate between bull and bear markets in a post-cycle world is inflows, best estimated by realized cap. Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 19
Regardless of Path Forward, BTC on Sale • Market-value-to-realized-value (MVRV) measures the profitability of coins presently held across the entire network. Naturally, the higher that this metric rises, the “frothier” the market price for bitcoin is, and the more selling pressure there will be from holders. • Notably, this metric is now at a level last witnessed in April 2020, when the price was still well below $10,000. This speaks to the amount of capital invested into the network since that time as the cost-basis has increased significantly. Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 20
Our Forecast = Choppy 1H, BTC to $200k in 2H • If inflows move us higher, what historical data can we observe to estimate what the next wave of demand will bring? • We observe a strong relationship between “days between ATH’s” and the relative increase in realized cap between said ATH’s. • Starting with the assumption that BTC benefits from macro tailwinds in 2H, we can use this relationship to estimate what increased demand in 2H 22 would bring to the asset and measure the reasonableness of this calculation against the comparable TAMs highlighted on slide 36. Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 21
Our Forecast = Choppy 1H, BTC to $200k in 2H • We applied an MVRV ratio of 3.2x, which is the historical median for Bitcoin when an ATH is reached, to the projected realized cap. • We sensitized the model to reach range of $138k to $222k. Metric 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Price ($) 5 14 730 321 430 969 13,921 3,687 7,167 29,023 46,355 199,924 % Growth NA 187% 5286% -56% 34% 126% 1337% -74% 94% 305% 60% 331% Supply (Millions) 8 11 12 14 15 16 17 17 18 19 19 19 Market Cap ($Millions) 38 144 8,901 4,384 6,458 15,577 233,524 64,362 129,970 539,438 876,857 3,846,412 % Growth NA 281% 6091% -51% 47% 141% 1399% -72% 102% 315% 63% 339% Realized Cap ($Millions) 39 80 3,279 4,380 4,529 6,940 83,783 79,251 101,001 171,741 463,116 1,198,092 % Growth NA 103% 4015% 34% 3% 53% 1107% -5% 27% 70% 170% 159% Incremental Value Stored ($Millions) NA 40 3,200 1,101 149 2,411 76,842 (4,532) 21,750 70,740 291,374 734,977 % Growth NA NA 7813% -66% -86% 1520% 3087% -106% -580% 225% 312% 152% Market Cap/Realized Cap 1.0x 1.8x 2.7x 1.0x 1.4x 2.2x 2.8x 0.8x 1.3x 3.1x 1.9x 3.2x Market Cap to Realized Cap / Proj. Realized Cap Increase (%) 199,924 3.0x 3.1x 3.2x 3.3x 3.4x 90% 138,064 142,666 147,749 151,870 156,472 110% 152,597 157,683 163,301 167,856 172,943 157% 186,819 193,046 199,924 205,501 211,728 150% 181,663 187,718 194,406 199,829 205,884 170% 196,196 202,735 209,958 215,815 222,355 Source: FS Insight, Coin Metrics 22
How does this play out? 1. Market continues experience volatility through the first rate increase 2. The liquidity of bitcoin’s supply will continue to decrease as coins shift to LTH 3. Fed liftoff after “extreme fear” already priced in (TINA?) 4. Several potential catalysts on the horizon 23
What Are Potential Catalysts? 1. TINA-driven investment (most probable “match”) 2. Top-down emerging market adoption (see: Central America) 3. Bottoms-up emerging market adoption (see: Turkey) We think that there is a strong case to be made 4. Spot ETF Approval that outsized inflation and geopolitical instability might push developing countries with volatile currencies to follow in El Salvador’s footsteps. While unlikely, this catalyst is the most underpriced. 24
Following the “Smart Money” On Chain • Throughout our research we have highlighted the signal derived from longer-term oriented wallets that are accustomed to accumulating during consolidation periods and selling into bull markets • Despite price >$35,000, LTH supply is at an all-time high and these wallets appear to be accumulating more BTC 30-Day Long-term Holder BTC Net Position Change LTH Sell into frothier markets LTH recently started accumulating Jun '20 Sep '20 Dec '20 Mar '21 Jun '21 Sep '21 Dec '21 Increase Decrease Price (USD) Source: FS Insight, Glassnode 25
….But Never to 0% Allocation • Sitting on the sidelines can be costly. If you missed the 10 best trading days of the past 10 years, your annualized returns would have shrunk from 147.1% to 90.9%. • The results are even more pronounced when applying the “best trading days” exercise to last year. Missing the best 4 trading days would leave you with negative returns. Bitcoin Returns - 2021 Bitcoin Returns 147.1% 2013 Through 2021 59.7% 90.9% 61.3% -1.8% -10.9% 39.1% -19.0% -26.3% 21.5% -33.0% -39.0% -44.3% 7.0% Total Top 4 Top 5 Top 6 Top 7 Top 8 Top 9 Top 10 Total Return Top 10 Top 20 Top 30 Top 40 Top 50 Return Returns without X trading days Returns without X trading days Source: FS Insight, TradingView 26
Global Crypto Market Cap = $9.6 Trillion • Our best estimate for the global crypto market cap under such a scenario for BTC would be $9.6 trillion, • This estimate is based on the Bitcoin dominance support at approximately 40% throughout 2021 BTC Dominance vs. Crypto Market Cap Bitcoin dominance has found support at approximately 40% three times in 2021 Forecast Bitcoin Market Cap (billions) $3,846 Bitcoin Dominance 40% Global Crypto Market Cap (billions) $9,616 Source: FS Insight, TradingView 27
Summary Source: FS Insight, Google 28
Table of 1 Introduction 2 Bitcoin Contents 3 Ethereum 4 Crypto Thesis Update 5 Crypto Equities 29
Ethereum Generated nearly $10 billion in fees • DeFi, Stablecoins, NFTs, and other Web3 applications drove incredible growth of the network. • Some of the top gas-consuming smart contracts OpenSea (NFTs), Uniswap (DeFi), Tether (Stablecoins), and MetaMask (DeFi) Annual Fees ($millions) ETH Fees ($millions) $12,000 $2,000 $1,800 9,920 $10,000 $1,600 $1,400 $8,000 $1,200 $6,000 $1,000 $800 $4,000 1,564% Annual $600 Growth $400 $2,000 596 $200 47 160 35 $0 $0 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Jan '21 Apr '21 Jul '21 Oct '21 Source: FS Insight, Coin Metrics 30
…Despite Competition • The L1 wars began in earnest 2021, as venture-backed chains offered new options for developers and users, most often competing on scalability. Layer 1 Multiple Comparison Project P/S ratio Terra 13,117.4x Polkadot 12,932.3x Cosmos 6,760.6x Cardano 2,613.1x Tough to comp against other speculative Layer 1’s Avalanche Solana Polkadot Tezos 1,723.3x (AVAX) (SOL) (DOT) NEAR Protocol 912.5x Solana 801.5x Elrond 460.8x Avalanche 357.8x Polygon 214.0x Fantom 81.3x Terra Algorand Cardano Ethereum 17.7x (LUNA) (ALGO) (ADA) Source: FS Insight, Token Terminal 31
ETH Supply Dynamics • EIP 1559 enacted a burning mechanism that results in disinflationary pressure on supply when fees are paid to miners. While we do not necessarily believe this to make ETH “sound” money, it is certainly beneficial for price. • There are now over 9 million ETH locked until the merge, as the year progresses, we think this should continue to increase as we achieve more clarity around timing. This could result in additional disinflationary pressure on the network. ETH Net Issuance Since EIP 1559 (ETH) 20,000 15,000 10,000 > 9 million ETH locked 5,000 - (5,000) (10,000) (15,000) (20,000) (25,000) 8/5/2021 9/5/2021 10/5/2021 11/5/2021 12/5/2021 1/5/2022 Total Issuance (ETH) Total Base Fees Burnt (ETH) Net Issuance (ETH) Source: FS Insight, Coin Metrics, Glassnode 32
Ethereum Undervalued Relative to Cloud Platforms • If we were to apply a grow-adjusted multiple to the Ethereum network based on emerging cloud companies, we would conclude on a fair value for 1 ETH in the $38k - $46k range. • We do not think that there is sufficient evidence that market participants measure ETH against Web2 cloud companies, and therefore do not project ETH to reach this value range. However, this exercise demonstrates how one could conclude that ETH is fundamentally undervalued. 160.0x $6,000 Growth The BVP Nasdaq Emerging Cloud EV / Annualized Revenue Growth Adjusted Comp Index Constituents Revenue Rate EV/Revenue 140.0x $5,000 MEAN 12.9x 37.6% 34.4x 120.0x MEDIAN 9.8x 33.5% 29.3x $4,000 100.0x Implied Value 80.0x $3,000 Low High 60.0x ETH Fees Annual Growth Rate 1564% 1564% 17x $2,000 40.0x Growth-Adjusted EV/Revenue Multiple 458.1x 538.6x $1,000 ETH Annualized Fees ($billions) $9,920 $9,920 20.0x Implied Ethereum EV ($billions) $4,543,947 $5,343,295 0.0x $0 Jul '20 Oct '20 Jan '21 Apr '21 Jul '21 Oct '21 ETH Circulating Supply (millions) 118 118 ETH Market Cap/Annualized Fees (Rolling 30-Day Total) Price (USD) Implied Price Per Token $38,617 $45,410 Source: FS Insight, BVP Cloud Index, Glassnode 33
We Think ETH Reaches $12k in 2022 • Despite a comp set of layer 1’s to comp to, we don’t think the market is necessarily pricing these assets based on fundamentals just yet. However, qualitatively, we feel that Ethereum is remarkably undervalued. • Instead, we applied a similar analysis to ETH (based on inflows and estimated MVRV) to arrive at a price target of $12,000 Metric 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022E Price ($) 1 8 742 131 129 739 3,687 11,892 % Growth NA 756% 9034% -82% -2% 475% 399% 223% Supply (Millions) 76 87 97 104 109 114 118 121 % Growth NA 15% 11% 8% 5% 5% 3% 3% Market Cap ($Millions) 72 711 71,770 13,618 14,020 84,297 433,787 1,443,197 % Growth NA 884% 9998% -81% 3% 501% 415% 233% Realized Cap ($Millions) 32 736 34,453 28,819 23,469 49,297 261,448 681,423 % Growth NA 2166% 4583% -16% -19% 110% 430% 161% Incremental Inflows ($Millions) NA 703 33,717 (5,634) (5,350) 25,828 212,151 419,975 % Growth NA NA 4694% -117% -5% -583% 721% 98% Market Cap/Realized Cap 2.2x 1.0x 2.1x 0.5x 0.6x 1.7x 1.7x 2.1x Market Cap to Realized Cap / Proj. Realized Cap Increase (%) 11,892 2.2x 2.3x 2.1x 2.5x 2.6x 140% 11,532 12,056 11,101 13,104 13,628 150% 12,012 12,558 11,564 13,650 14,196 157% 12,353 12,915 11,892 14,038 14,599 170% 12,973 13,563 12,489 14,742 15,332 180% 13,454 14,065 12,952 15,288 15,900 Source: FS Insight, Coin Metrics 34
Potential Catalysts It has been expressed within the Ethereum community that there is optimism surrounding the transition to PoS in 2022, which if it were to transpire, would likely 1. The merge result in capital inflows irrespective of BTC performance. 2. BTC demand increase (rotations!) 3. Layer 2 development 4. ETF launch (futures or spot) 35
Table of 1 Introduction 2 Bitcoin Contents 3 Ethereum 4 Crypto Thesis Update 5 Crypto Equities 36
Bitcoin Provides a Global Value Settlement Layer • A trustless, P2P electronic payment system • Bitcoin’s transparent and immutable architecture coupled with its finite and fungible supply allows it to serve as a superior store of value for investors. For this reason, many have dubbed Bitcoin as digital gold. • We think that other short- and long-term stores of value such as real estate and bond markets present equally compelling market-sizing comparisons for Bitcoin. Bitcoin:
Smart Contract Platforms Provide Decentralized Computing • People saw what BTC could do and wanted to do more things in a trustless manner. Ethereum was launched in 2015 with smart contract functionality, thus providing a distributed computing platform. • In the years following Ethereum’s gain in popularity, several additional layer 1 platforms were launched to compete with and against Ethereum. These platforms include the likes of Solana, Cardano, Avalanche, and Polkadot. • Many refer to these open protocols as decentralized cloud services, since they allow for computation and storage without the closed and siloed architecture of AWS or Microsoft Azure. Cloud Infrasructure Market Revenues (Bn) Rank Company Market Cap ($Bn) $300 14% 1 Ethereum $321 2 Adobe 236 $250 12% 3 Salesforce 208 10% 4 PayPal 184 $200 5 Shopify 109 8% 6 ServiceNow 96 $150 6% 7 Snowflake 78 $100 8 Atlassian 74 4% 9 Workday 56 $50 2% 10 Square 52 11 Zoom 42 $0 0% Q3 2020 Q4 2020 Q1 2021 Q2 2021 Q3 2021 Q4 2021 Q1 2022 Q2 2022 Q3 2022 Q4 2022 Ethereum is Quarterly Trailing Twelve Months Annualized Quarterly Growth larger than all • Cloud Infrastructure revenues continue to grow at a rapid clip, surpassing $182 billion in annualized quarterly revenue in Q3 2021 companies in the • Assuming a quarterly growth rate of 7%, annualized revenues will surpass $250 billion next BVP Cloud Index year Source: FS Insight, Bessemer Venture Partners, Synergy Research Group 38
Smart Contract Platforms Provide Decentralized Computing • L1 platforms are the new rails on which value is stored and exchanged. For the first time software is eating trust-based services. • the goal of these platforms is to house native apps in their respective digital ecosystems, comparing these platforms to centralized cloud companies may be limiting. Instead, we think it might be more reasonable to compare them to digital “economies” with proprietary sets of rules governing value creation, storage, and transfer. Total Stock (Crypto) Total Stock (Crypto) Rank Country Market Cap Rank Country Market Cap 1 United States 40,720 16 South Africa 1,052 2 China 12,214 17 Brazil 988 All Smart Contract 3 Japan 6,718 18 Spain 759 platforms 4 Hong Kong SAR, China 6,130 19 Russian Federation 695 combined would be 5 United Kingdom 3,571 20 Singapore 653 equal to the 23rd 6 Canada 2,641 21 Italy 587 Largest Economy 7 India 2,595 22 Thailand 543 8 Saudi Arabia 2,429 23 All L1's 520 9 France 2,366 24 Indonesia 496 10 Germany 2,284 25 Malaysia 437 11 Korea, Rep. 2,176 26 Mexico 400 Ethereum would 12 Switzerland 2,002 27 Ethereum 321 be the 27th largest 13 Australia 1,721 28 Belgium 321 economy 14 Iran, Islamic Rep. 1,218 29 Norway 296 15 Netherlands 1,100 30 United Arab Emirates 295 Slide 39 Source: FS Insight, World Bank, Messari, CoinMarketCap
Decentralized Apps (dApp) Bring Economic Productivity • The GDP of decentralized digital ecosystems will be powered by dApps. Current dApps fall into several major categories including Decentralized Finance (DeFi), NFTs/Metaverse/Gaming, Web3, and DAOs. • The first “killer” dApps in crypto were DeFi applications that entered the mainstream in 2020 and continue to be widely used today. DeFi consists of financial applications built on blockchains that are designed with composability, interoperability, and tokenized incentives. A Complete Financial Services Suite Growth in Assets Invested Current DeFi Market Cap: $65 billion(1) Every day, there are new applications Total Value Locked (TVL), the amount being built and brought online that of capital dedicated to DeFi protocols, service the entire spectrum of financial has increased to $245B, and it isn’t products such as lending, exchanges, slowing down payments, asset management, etc. Market Cap of Global Financial Services Sector: TVL is equivalent to 1.4% of all $9,160 billion(1) (140x DeFi) 669 deposits in US Commercial Banks Protocols to Choose From Over the past year, the number of DeFi Lending Payments users has grown 4.5x Global DeFi TVL (2021) A 10% market capture would result in 14x $245B returns from today Exchanges Assets +600% % Market Theorized Capture Market Cap Return 5% 458 7.0x Insurance Derivatives 10% 916 14.1x $35B 15% 1,374 21.1x 20% 1,832 28.2x Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Source: FS Insight, University of Cambridge, Statista, Bloomberg, Fidelity, Market Data as of November 2021 40
Web3 • “Web3” has evolved to take on a variety of meanings. We view web3 as crypto networks that unbundle internet infrastructure and disrupt gatekeepers. • The concept behind Web3 aims to unbundle the legacy internet infrastructure by providing decentralized alternatives to highly centralized incumbent companies. • Decentralized Web3 protocols earn revenues by charging fees for usage – paid in the native token. Web2 Web3 Summary • Protocols like Livepeer and Akash consolidate excess Computation computational resources – creating a censorship-resistant decentralized network to host apps and content. • Protocols like Filecoin and Arweave provide decentralized trustless Storage storage for web2 files and web3 assets like NFTs. • The Graph indexes blockchain and protocol data like Google Indexing indexes web2 data – making it easily accessible and searchable. • Web3 provides content creators several benefits over Web2 Content including instant streaming payments, cheaper project funding & distribution, and closer relationships with fans. • Web3 networking protocols allow for zero-capex network growth Networking by decentralizing cellular infrastructure. Participants are incentivized to run nodes providing a wireless mesh network. Source: FS Insight 41
Web3 Networking Example of Web3 Networking: Helium • Rethinking traditional communications infrastructure, Helium deployed and operates the world’s largest Long Range Wide Area Network (LoRaWAN) of over 300k hotspots – without physical infrastructure costs (CAPEX) or bandwidth costs (OPEX). • Participants are incentivized to grow the network by deploying hotspots that facilitate data transfers. Customers utilizing the Helium Network pay a fee – in the native HNT token – to hotspot owners for each successful transfer. IoT TAM Network Coverage Today Total Annual Market Revenue: $200B Smart Personal Safety Trackers Tracking $0.5B $3B Micromobility Pet & Livestock Tracking Tracking $1B $5.5B Agricultural IoT Fleet Tracking $11B $18B Smart Buildings Smart City $66B Infrastructure $100B Current Customers Hotspot Development Today Disruption Targets Exp. 2022 LoRaWAN 5G Source: FS Insight, Fortune Business Insights, Helium 42
Web3 Content Audius: Removing Middlemen in Music • The music industry generates $42 billion in annual revenue, artists only capture 12%. Audius allows artists to capture 90%. • Artists get paid in real-time compared to the legacy multi-month payout system. Current Streaming Platforms Streaming Platform Fee 88% Record Label Cut 12% Artist Share Admin/Ops Costs Audius 10% 90% Launched Tracks Artists MAU Node Artist Share Operators 2019 450k 100k 5M vs competition Adoption In the news Artists Deadmau5 Skrillex Lido RAC 3lau Alina Baraz Zeds Dead REZZ Source: FS Insight, Audius, CNBC 43
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) • Change how entities coordinate and work through aligned incentives • DAOs are communities that align around a mission, typically through a community treasury and a shared set of rules enforced on a blockchain. While DAOs offer a novel way of coordinating, they need to overcome some hurdles before getting adopted by the mainstream. Majority of tooling for DAOs still rely on Web 2.0 and sustainable incentive structures for core / full-time contributors have yet to surface. Traditional DAOs Summary • Traditional corporations typically operate in teams, with tight organizational structures centered around a key figure. • DAO members mostly function as sole contributors to the DAO mission, working together Rigid Flexible with one another as needed. • Corporations are governed from the top-down and typically have a singular leader who leads corporations to achieve goals. • DAO members submit proposals on which other members can vote. Most DAOs adopt a ‘1- Hierarchical Grassroots token-1-vote’ model. • Corporations typically provide audited financial statements, a historical view of the company at a point in time. • Since activity is recorded on the blockchain, DAOs provide transparency in the form of real- Not usually transparent Transparent time transactions, recipients, and timestamps. • Corporations typically are “invite-only”, hiring individuals with desired values and skills to help further the entity’s vision. • DAOs are open for anyone to join, but typically require minimum token holdings to align Invite-only Open interests before allowing participation. • Some corporations are global-first, but most start local and expand across geographies as business lines grow. • DAOs are global by default, and due to their global nature, still require Web 2.0 tooling to Not always global Fully global coordinate and work across geographies. Source: FS Insight, Forefront, Snapshot, Deepdao.io 44
Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) • Change how entities coordinate and work through aligned incentives • Today, there are more than 2,000 DAOs managing over $100B in assets, attracting an estimated 2M DAO members and token holders. Ideated in 2017, DAOs are still in the early innings of changing the way we coordinate. Protocol DAOs – Uniswap Investment DAOs – The LAO • Protocol DAOs govern and vote on proposals put forth by its • Investment DAOs focus on investments through pooled funds with members to allocate funds in protocol treasuries. The modus the explicit purpose of wealth creation. operandi of different DAOs vary widely to serve different purposes. • The LAO is the first limited-liability for-profit DAO launched by • Uniswap’s ($UNI) treasury directs native token emissions to OpenLaw, enabling members to invest ETH to generate profits. contributor grants, community initiatives, and liquidity mining. • The treasury holds $37M of dry powder in its treasury and has • UNI tokens can be used to vote on governance proposals or invested $70m in over 120 investments at writing. delegated to protocol delegates to vote on their behalf. • Investment DAOs are generally perceived as competitors to • Through the flows described above, Uniswap currently holds over traditional venture capital, with some protocols preferring DAO $4B in its treasury, with approximately half of that in liquid assets. funding because of their shared grassroots nature. Grant-giving DAOs – BitDAO Social DAOs – Friends with Benefits • Grant-giving DAOs support the decentralized economy by supplying • Social DAOs are often described as ‘modern-day country clubs’, with funding to proposals across subsectors, including economic token values backed by an individual, brand or community. alignment, treasury management, and governance. • One such example is Friends with Benefits ($FWB), a cultural • BitDAO is a DAO launched by Singapore-based Bybit exchange, membership powered by a community of creators. having raised 112,000 ETH on Sushiswap’s MISO launchpad. • It leverages a tiered membership model where members hold $FWB • It is the largest grant-giving DAO (treasury over $3.5B), and counts tokens to get access to online and in-person events, editorials, its Peter Thiel, Pantera Capital and Dragonfly as investors. proprietary auction platform and local meet-ups. • Potential proposals include project partnerships, ecosystem funds, • Boasting over 2,000 members and $18M in its treasury, FWB has artist guilds, farming cooperatives, and R&D labs. grown from a token-gated group chat to a full-featured online space. These DAO subcategories are not mutually exclusive – many combine one or more subcategories to differentiate from one another Source: FS Insight, Etherscan.io, 45
The Non-fungible World is Much Larger Than the Fungible • DLT can be used to verify ownership and transfer of unique assets • NFTs burst into the mainstream in 2021 with increasingly popular profile picture (pfp) NFTs such as CryptoPunks and Bored Ape Yacht Club. Digital art also gained traction as a whole new cohort of crypto investors entered the fold, realizing the ability to monetize and financialize art and cultural assets. • Ultimately, any non-fungible asset (collectibles, art, real estate, auto, etc) will be secured and traded on digital rails. NFT Volume $3 $14 $12 $2 Proven NFT use-cases point to a $10 current addressable market of $1 $2 trillion in annual sales $8 $6 $1 $4 Market 2020 Sales (Bn) $1 Art Market $50 $2 Collectibles 175 Luxury Goods 254 $0 $0 Gaming 179 Oct '20 Jan '21 Apr '21 Jul '21 Oct '21 Gambling 403 Weekly Volume (LHS, Mn) Cumulative Volume (RHS, Bn) Current NFT Addressable Market $1,061 Source: Loup Funds, Art Basel, DappRadar 46
The Layers of the Metaverse Technology Stack • Metaverse is a virtual world and interconnected ecosystem where users and businesses can create, interact, and monetize by proving services and creating content. The seven layers of the Metaverse help create, maintain, monetize, and develop the virtual worlds. Front Ends & Interfaces Issuance & Marketplaces Lending Liquidity Goods & IaaS Hardware Management Compute Content, Assets, ID Services Metaverse Networking NFT Financialization Payment Gaming & Virtual Worlds Sports Utility Music & Gov. Services Interchange Virtual Tools & Platforms Verticals & Applications Standards Layer-2 & Sidechains Layer-1 Infrastructure Source: FS Insight 47
Table of 1 Introduction 2 Bitcoin Contents 3 Ethereum 4 Crypto Thesis Update 5 Crypto Equities 48
Crypto Equities Might Offer Crypto Beta Type Company Ticker ($Million) Type Company Ticker ($Million) Miners Marathon Digital Holdings MARA 2,117 Exchanges Coinbase COIN 37,090 Riot Blockchain RIOT 1,626 Bakkt Holdings BKKT 2,369 Hut 8 Mining HUT 884 Voyager Digital VYGVF 1,206 Terawulf Inc WULF 1,017 Mogo MOGO 152 Cipher Mining Inc CIFR 679 Hive Blockchain HIVE 684 Banks/ Other Signature Bank SBNY 18,453 Galaxy Digital GLXY CN 5,027 Iris Energy IREN 589 Silvergate Bank SI 2,807 Bitfarms Ltd. BITF 617 Metropolitan Bank MCB 1,061 Canaan Inc CAN 650 Bitwise Crypto Industry ETF BITQ 88 Greenidge Generation GREE 428 Argo Blockchaim ARBK 327 Crypto SPACs Power&Digital Infra. SPAC I XPDI 365 Stronghold Digital Mining SDIG 371 Blockchain Coinvestors SPAC BCSAU 407 Bit Mining Ltd BTCM 211 Power&Digital Infra. SPAC II XPDBU 358 CleanSpark Inc CLSK 251 Adit EdTech Acquisition Corp ADEX 341 Bit Digital Inc BTBT 252 Crypto 1 Acquisition Corp DAOOU 290 Ebang International EBON 162 Abri SPAC I ASPAU 77 The9 Ltd NCTY 82 Bitcoin/Crypto Grayscale Bitcoin Trust GBTC 17,550 DMG Blockchain Solutions DMGI CN 105 Balance Sheet MicroStrategy MSTR 3,500 Taal Distributed Information TAAL CN 108 Plays ProShares Bitcoin ETF BITO 33 Cryptostar Corp CSTR CN 40 Bitwise 10 Index Fund BITW 621 Sysorex Inc SYSX 14 VanEck Bitcoin Strategy ETF XBTF 18 Source: FS Insight, Bloomberg 49
Bitcoin Miners Behave as Leveraged Plays on BTC Source: FS Insight, TradingView 50
Sean Farrell Twitter: @SeanMFarrell Will McEvoy Twitter: @will__mcevoy The Digital Assets Team Walter Teng Jack Runge 51
Disclosures This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. For important disclosures and rating histories regarding sectors or companies that are the subject of this report, please contact your sales representative or FS Insight at 150 East 52nd Street, New York, NY, 10022 USA. Analyst Certification (Reg AC) Sean Farrell, the research analyst denoted by an “AC” on the cover of this report, hereby certifies that all of the views expressed in this report accurately reflect my personal views, which have not been influenced by considerations of the firm’s business or client relationships. Neither I (Sean Farrell), nor a member of my household is an officer, director, or advisory board member of the issuer(s) or has another significant affiliation with the issuer(s) that is/are the subject of this research report. There is a possibility that we will from time to time have long or short positions in, and buy or sell, the securities or derivatives, if any, referred to in this research Conflicts of Interest This research contains the views, opinions and recommendations of FS Insight. This report is intended for research and educational purposes. Analyst Industry/Sector Views Positive (+): The analyst expects the performance of his industry/sector coverage universe over the next 6-18 months to be attractive vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, being the S&P 500 for North America. Neutral (N): The analyst expects the performance of his or her industry/sector coverage universe over the next 6-18 months to be in line with the relevant broad market benchmark, being the S&P 500 for North America. Negative (-): The analyst expects his or her industry coverage universe over the next 6-18 months to underperform vs. the relevant broad market benchmark, being the S&P 500 for North America. General Disclosures FS Insight is an independent research company and is not a registered investment advisor and is not acting as a broker dealer under any federal or state securities laws. FS Insight is a member of IRC Securities’ Research Prime Services Platform. IRC Securities is a FINRA registered broker-dealer that is focused on supporting the independent research industry. Certain personnel of FS Insight (i.e. Research Analysts) are registered representatives of IRC Securities, a FINRA member firm registered as a broker-dealer with the Securities and Exchange Commission and certain state securities regulators. As registered representatives and independent contractors of IRC Securities, such personnel June receive commissions paid to or shared with IRC Securities for transactions placed by FS Insight clients directly with IRC Securities or with securities firms that June share commissions with IRC Securities in accordance with applicable SEC and FINRA requirements. IRC Securities does not distribute the research of FS Insight, which is available to select institutional clients that have engaged FS Insight. As registered representatives of IRC Securities our analysts must follow IRC Securities’ Written Supervisory Procedures. Notable compliance policies include (1) prohibition of insider trading or the facilitation thereof, (2) maintaining client confidentiality, (3) archival of electronic communications, and (4) appropriate use of electronic communications, amongst other compliance related policies. FS Insight does not have the same conflicts that traditional sell-side research organizations have because FS Insight (1) does not conduct any investment banking activities and (2) does not manage any investment funds. This research is for the clients of FS Insight only. Additional information is available upon request. Information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable but FS Insight does not warrant its completeness or accuracy except with respect to any disclosures relative to FS Insight and the analyst's involvement (if any) with any of the subject companies of the research. All pricing is as of the market close for the securities discussed, unless otherwise stated. Opinions and estimates constitute our judgment as of the date of this material and are subject to change without notice. Past performance is not indicative of future results. This material is not intended as an offer or solicitation for the purchase or sale of any financial instrument. The opinions and recommendations herein do not take into account individual client circumstances, risk tolerance, objectives, or needs and are not intended as recommendations of particular securities, financial instruments or strategies. The recipient of this report must make its own independent decision regarding any securities or financial instruments mentioned herein. Except in circumstances where FS Insight expressly agrees otherwise in writing, FS Insight is not acting as a municipal advisor and the opinions or views contained herein are not intended to be, and do not constitute, advice, including within the meaning of Section 15B of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. All research reports are disseminated and available to all clients simultaneously through electronic publication to our internal client website, FS Insight.com. Not all research content is redistributed to our clients or made available to third-party aggregators or the media. Please contact your sales representative if you would like to receive any of our research publications. Copyright 2021 FS Insight LLC. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reprinted, sold or redistributed without the prior written consent of FS Insight LLC. Slide 52
You can also read